Dosen Pengampu :
2. Penulis :
K. Suresh Babu , S. Savitha
4. Metode :
Studi observasi ini dilakukan pada 100 pasien yang didiagnosis apendisitis akut di rumah sakit
perawatan tersier selama tahun 2001 hingga 2002. Profil klinis seperti usia, jenis kelamin,
gejala pasien dan komplikasi pasca operasi dicatat. Semua pasien menjalani operasi usus buntu
dan diikuti pasca operasi.
6. Kesimpulan Jurnal :
Apendisitis akut yang sangat umum pada kelompok usia yang lebih muda menunjukkan bahwa
setiap kali pasien muda datang dengan nyeri perut akut dapat dianggap apendisitis akut.
Komplikasi apendektomi sangat minimal dan memberikan prognosis yang baik.
7. Kesimpulan Kelompok :
Studi ini menemukan bahwa sebagian besar pasien didiagnosis apendisitis akut penderitanya
berada pada kelompok usia 15 hingga 30 tahun. Nyeri perut berada pada 100%, demam 81%
dan muntah pada 75% .Studi ini menemukan bahwa 3% dari pasien mengalami komplikasi
pasca operasi dan juga sebagian besar disebabkan oleh infeksi luka, luka menganga, obstruksi
mangkuk kecil perekat yang sedikit lebih rendah hingga 11% dalam studi yang dilakukan oleh
Jess P 7,19% dari pasien telah berkembang demam pasca operasi dan mungkin karena berbagai
alasan seperti infeksi saluran kemih atau juga infeksi saluran pernapasan.
2. Penulis :
Ida Lofman, Karolina Szummer, Ulf Dahlström, Tomas Jernberg, dan Lars H. Lund.
5. Diskusi :
Ini adalah perbandingan CKD yang besar, dapat digeneralisasikan, jangka panjang, dan
komprehensif pertama di HFpEF, HFmrEF, dan HfrEF. menurut jenis HF baru dalam pedoman
ESC HF terbaru. 5 Ada beberapa temuan penting. Hubungan antara CKD dan karakteristik
seperti usia yang lebih tua, jenis kelamin perempuan, dan keparahan gagal jantung yang lebih
besar adalah serupa pada ketiga kelompok. Namun, HFpEF menonjol sebagai perbedaan
dibandingkan dengan HFmrEF dan HFrEF, yang lebih mirip. Pada HFpEF, CKD lebih umum
tetapi kurang penting, dengan hubungan yang lebih lemah dengan kematian, sedikit modifikasi
risiko oleh penanda risiko gagal jantung konvensional, dan dengan kekuatan yang kurang
diskriminatif untuk kematian. Dalam penelitian ini, lebih dari 50% menderita HFrEF. Proporsi
HFpEF dan HFmrEF sama-sama umum, dengan proporsi HFpEF sedikit lebih rendah
dibandingkan penelitian sebelumnya. Studi ini berbeda dari laporan sebelumnya, di mana
HFmrEF telah dikeluarkan atau dikelompokkan dengan populasi HFpEF atau HFrEF. penelitian
ini memberikan deskripsi baru dan rinci tentang kelompok HFmrEF, di mana banyak
karakteristik klinis seperti usia, proporsi wanita, dan hipertensi berada pada kontinum antara
HFpEF dan HFrEF tetapi karakteristik tertentu, seperti penyakit jantung iskemik dan katup
jantung, jelas lebih mirip dengan HFrEF daripada HfpEF.
6. Kesimpulan
CKD dikaitkan dengan kovariat serupa terlepas dari EF. Meskipun CKD lebih sering terjadi
pada HFpEF daripada di HFmrEF dan HFrEF, CKD mungkin memiliki lebih banyak peran
'pengamat' dalam HFpEF, kurang terkait dengan kematian dan dengan diskriminasi prognostik
yang lebih rendah.
2. Penulis :
Bárbara M. Schultz , Carolina A. Paduro , Geraldyne A. Salazar , Francisco J. Salazar-
Echegarai , Valentina P. Sebastián , Claudia A. Riedel , Alexis M. Kalergis , Manuel Alvarez-
Lobos * dan Susan M. Bueno , Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Genética
Molec
4. Metode :
Metode deskriptif
MDP menginduksi autophagy dalam sel dendritik, sebuah proses yang membutuhkan
pensinyalan NOD2 yang benar, yang pada gilirannya membutuhkan fungsi ATG16L1 yang
tepat. Protein ini diperlukan untuk fungsi NOD2 dan presentasi antigen yang benar ( 125 ).
Mutasi pada gen ini menghasilkan kerusakan dalam proses autophagy dalam sel dendritik, yang
menunjukkan perdagangan bakteri yang menyimpang dan kegagalan untuk menghasilkan
presentasi antigen pada molekul MHC-II, yang pada gilirannya mendorong pembentukan sel
CD4 + T efektor khusus antigen ( 125 ). Semua cacat ini memungkinkan bakteri bertahan lebih
lama di dalam sel dendritik, menghindari degradasi lisosom untuk waktu yang lama ( 126 ,
127 ) dan untuk menyediakan mekanisme persistensi patogen dan akibatnya inflamasi persisten.
Selain itu, telah dilaporkan bahwa S. Typhimurium menggunakan sel dendritik yang
mengekspresikan CCR7 sebagai jalur untuk bermigrasi dari usus ke MLN
6. Kesimpulan Jurnal :
Infeksi Typhimurium dapat memicu peradangan kronis pada individu yang membawa satu atau
lebih cacat yang terkait dengan IBD, mengingat ketidakmampuan pasien ini untuk
membersihkan bakteri di usus dengan benar. Bahkan, S. Typhimurium memiliki gudang faktor
virulensi yang penting untuk menyerang sel inang di epitel usus dan lamina propria yang tidak
dapat dijangkau oleh mikrobiota normal. Selain itu, diketahui bahwa bakteri ini dapat
menyebabkan infeksi persisten pada manusia dan tikus, menunjukkan bahwa pada pasien yang
menunjukkan satu atau lebih cacat genetik yang mempengaruhi perkembangan IBD; mungkin
saja mereka jauh lebih rentan tertular S. Typhimurium dan menyebabkan infeksi yang terus-
menerus. Infeksi permanen sel dengan S. Typhimurium dapat meningkatkan sekresi sitokin pro-
inflamasi oleh sel yang terinfeksi, menghasilkan lingkungan inflamasi di lapisan usus,
mendorong perubahan mikrobiota dan mempromosikan penyakit kronis. Akan relevan untuk
mengevaluasi apakah pasien IBD adalah karier kronis S. Typhimurium di usus.
7. Kesimpulan Kelompok :
komunitas mikroba dapat berubah karena usia, nutrisi, proses inflamasi, dan penyakit
gastrointestinal. keberadaan mikrobiota komensal menginduksi ekspresi basal TLR tertentu
(seperti TLR2 dan TLR5), dibandingkan dengan tingkat ekspresi basal yang diamati pada tikus
bebas patogen spesifik dan tikus bebas kuman. Penyakit radang usus ditandai dengan
peningkatan kepadatan bakteri di tingkat mukosa ( 62 , 63 ), serta berkurangnya jumlah bakteri
komensal anti-inflamasi, seperti Gram-positif Firmicutes dan Actinobacteria ( 56 , 64 ). Sebagai
konsekuensi dari disbiosis ini (disregulasi mikrobiota komensal), peningkatan jumlah bakteri
yang berpotensi membahayakan (seperti Enterobacteriaceae) dapat terjadi, menghasilkan
peradangan.
1. Judul Jurnal :
Clinical outcomes in chuldren and adolescents initiating antiretroviral therapy in decentralized
healthcare settings in Zimbabwe
2. Penulis :
Grace McHugh , Victoria Simms , Ethel Dauya , Tsitsi Bandason , Prosper Chonzi , Dafni
Metaxa , Shungu Munyati , Kusum Nathoo , Hilda Mujuru , Katharina Kranzer 1,5 dan Rashida
A. Ferrand *
4. Metode :
Peserta direkrut antara Januari 2013 dan Desember 2014 dan diikuti selama 18 bulan. Tingkat
dan alasan kematian, rawat inap dan kehadiran Puskesmas yang tidak terjadwal dipastikan.
Pemodelan proporsional Cox digunakan untuk menentukan bahaya kematian, kehadiran tidak
terjadwal dan rawat inap.
6. Kesimpulan Jurnal :
Meskipun hanya 64% dari peserta yang mencapai penekanan virologi, hasil klinisnya baik dan
tingkat retensi yang tinggi dalam perawatan diamati. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa di era yang
bergerak menuju perawatan yang dibedakan selain penerapan pengobatan universal, perawatan
HIV yang terdesentralisasi untuk anak dapat dicapai. Intervensi untuk meningkatkan kepatuhan
pada kelompok usia ini sangat dibutuhkan.
7. Kesimpulan Kelompok :
Penelitian kami menunjukkan bahwa perawatan HIV yang dipimpin perawat terdesentralisasi
untuk anak adalah mungkin dan menghasilkan hasil klinis yang sebanding dengan yang
dilaporkan pada anak-anak di tempat lain di Afrika bagian selatan [ 20 ]. Penerapan pedoman
WHO 2015 yang merekomendasikan pengobatan universal untuk semua orang yang terinfeksi
HIV, kemungkinan besar menghasilkan peningkatan yang bermakna pada anak yang memenuhi
syarat untuk pengobatan, terutama mengingat cakupan ART yang rendah saat ini. Investasi
yang cukup besar untuk HIV yang sesuai dengan usia. strategi pengujian, pelatihan dan
dukungan untuk penyedia layanan kesehatan primer dan intervensi untuk mendukung
kepatuhan perlu diperkuat untuk mencapai akses universal dan hasil pengobatan yang optimal
di antara anak-anak dan remaja.
International Surgery Journal
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170530
Original Research Article
Department of Surgery, Government Royapettah Hospital, Kilpauk Medical College, Tamilnadu, India
*Correspondence:
E-mail: sures8598@gmail.com
Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Background: Acute appendicitis is a common problem in children and early adult life. Appendicectomy is immediate
or emergency procedure to reduce morbidity and mortality. The present study was conducted to find out clinical
profile of acute appendicitis and complications of appendicectomy.
Methods: This observational study was conducted among 100 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis in tertiary care
hospital during the year from 2001 to 2002. The clinical profile like age, sex, symptoms of the patients and post-
operative complications were recorded. All patients underwent appendicectomy and followed post operatively.
Results: Out of hundred patients, 55% were male and 45% were female. Nearly 71% of the patients belonged to the
age group of 15-30 years.100% had pain abdomen, 81% had fever and 75% had vomiting. The post-operative
complication was 3%.
Conclusions: Acute appendicitis is very common in younger age groups shows that whenever young patients present
with acute abdominal pain may be considered acute appendicitis. The complication of appendicectomy is very
minimum and gives good prognosis.
Keywords: Appendicitis, Post-operative, Retrocaecal
INTRODUCTION
The lifetime prevalence of acute appendicitis is
approximately 7%.2 Acute appendicitis is the most
common cause of acute abdomen requiring surgical
The vermiform appendix is considered to be a vestigial intervention during childhood, accounting for 1-8% of
organ, its importance in surgery due only to its propensity children who present to the paediatric emergency room
for inflammation which results in clinical syndrome with acute abdominal pain.3
known as acute appendicitis. Acute appendicitis is a
common problem among older children and young adults.
This problem occurs sudden in onset and warrants the
patients to seek immediate health care. The present study was conducted to find out the common
symptoms, certain demographic profile and post-operative
complication of acute appendicitis which may help in
diagnosing and management of acute appendicitis.
Occasionally the perforation of appendix may produce
life threatening situations. Several studies reported male
predominance than female. Many patients have typical
METHODS
clinical symptoms like abdominal pain, fever and
vomiting. Most of the times Appendicectomy reduces
morbidity and mortality. In United States, 250,000 cases
of appendicitis are reported annually.1 Descriptive study was done at government Royapettah
Hospital, Kilpauk Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India.
100 Patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis were The position of the appendix during the surgery nearly
taken for the study. Study duration was 2001 to 2002. 82% of the position of appendix was retrocaecal (Table
2). 94% of appendixes were inflamed and 4% were
perforated and 2% were gangrenous. About 19% of the
patients developed fever after the surgery and 3% were
The study was conducted among randomly selected 100
developed post-operative complications. Among 3
patients with acute appendicitis diagnosed with the help patients one patient had wound infection, one patient had
of clinical examination and other investigation like wound infection and wound gaping and another patient
ultrasonogram. The clinical symptoms were recorded, had wound infection, wound gaping and small bowl
certain demographic profile like age and sex were obstruction. All these patients were treated appropriately
collected. All the 100 patients were underwent and discharged in good condition. No delayed
appendicectomy and followed in the hospital for complications were observed in follow up of the patients.
immediate complication and also followed for remote The mortality was not observed in this study. The
complications. All patients have received 3 to 7 days proteus organisms, pseudomonas organisms were found
antibiotics, and regular treatment. Appropriate treatment in wound infections.
was given wherever complication was noted.
RESULTS
population (N = 100).
0-14 06 06 12 12
15-30 41 30 71 71
31-46 07 08 15 15
46-61 01 00 01 01
Above 62 00 01 01 01
Pelvic 11 11
Postileal 03 03
Preileal 02 02
Paracolic 01 01
Sub caecal 01 01
The limitations of the study was size of the sample which
is little low and if larger sample may show minimal
variations.
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The present study was conducted among 100 patients
diagnosed as acute appendicitis and observed that male
were more in number (55%) than female shows that male The authors would like to thank Dr. P. K. Govindarajan,
predominance in acute appendicitis is one of the notable Professor and Head, Community Medicine RMMC for
factor which is similar to 60% in male in a study his guidelines in publication of the paper
conducted by Chaudhar YP et al in Maharastra, India.4
Methods
and results
1 Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Institution of Medicine (H7), Huddinge; Karolinska Institutet, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden; 2
Department of Cardiology
and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; 3Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm,
Sweden; and 4Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Received 24 November 2016; revised 4 February 2017; accepted 21 February 2017 ; online publish-ahead-of-print 29 March 2017
Aims As the role of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in different types of heart failure (HF) is poorly understood,
our aim was to compare CKD in HF with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced
ejection fraction (HFrEF) with regard to prevalence, associations and prognostic role.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
Patients in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry were divided into three groups based on EF (≥50%, 40–49%
2
and <40%). CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min.1.73 m . Associations
between covariates and CKD and between CKD and mortality were assessed with multivariable regressions.
Of 40 230 patients, 8875 (22%) had HFpEF, 8374 (21%) had HFmrEF, and 22 981 (57%) had HFrEF, with a
CKD prevalence of 56%, 48%, and 45%, respectively. Associations between covariates and CKD were
similar in all EF groups. One-year mortality with vs. without CKD was 23% vs. 13% in HFpEF, 22% vs. 8% in
HFmrEF, and 23% vs. 8% in HFrEF (P < 0.001 for all). After adjustment, CKD was more strongly associated
with death in HFrEF and HFmrEF than in HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.49
(1.42–1.56) and 1.51 (1.40–1.63) vs. 1.32 (1.24–1.42); P for interaction <0.001]. In receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) analyses, CKD was also a stronger predictor of death in HFrEF and HFmrEF than in
HFpEF [area under the curve (AUC) 0.699 (0.689–0.709) and 0.700 (0.683–0.716) vs. 0.629 (0.613 –0.645)].
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
Conclusion CKD was associated with similar covariates regardless of EF. Although CKD was more common in
HFpEF than in HFmrEF and HFrEF, it may have more of a ‘bystander’ role in HFpEF, being less
associated with mortality and with lower prognostic discrimination.
........................................................................................................
..
Keywords Heart failure • Preserved ejection fraction • Mid-range ejection fraction • Chronic kidney
disease • Mortality • Prognosis
Introduction
in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). 4 Similarly,
...................
... ...
The registry includes variables concerning baseline description of
heterogeneous syndrome that remains poorly understood and
.. ..
patients, including risk factors, history of heart disease, cardiac diag-
5,6
nostics and interventions, medication, and laboratory tests.
.
Serum creatinine was obtained at discharge for hospitalized patients
ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is increasingly viewed as a separate
...
and at the closest date preceding an outpatient visit. Glomerular
category7,8 and was defined as a distinct EF 40–49% phenotype
... ...
filtration rate was estimated (eGFR) with the Chronic Kidney Disease
in particular need of further study in the recent European Society 16
5
of Cardiology (ESC) HF guidelines. HFmrEF may be more similar
... ...
Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. CKD was defined
.
to HFpEF or to HFrEF, it may be a transition between the two, 2
as an eGFR ≤60 mL/min.1.73 m , in line with earlier studies of HF
...
or it may be a distinct syndrome. HFpEF may be a separate syn- 4
... ...
drome dominated by diastolic dysfunction, similar to HFmrEF and measurement and method according to local practice (in Sweden
HFrEF or merely a manifestation primarily of age and age-related
generally echocardiography with the Simpson method).
...
9 10
co-morbidities, obesity, and deconditioning.
... ... ...
, We defined HFpEF as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%,
... ..
The link between CKD and HFmrEF and HFpEF is poorly HFmrEF as LVEF 40– 49%, and HFrEF as LVEF <40%, according to
... ...
HFmrEF and HFrEF with regard to CKD. Earlier reports did not
...
..
...
. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .
examined only as part of a general co-morbidity burden. 14 Dependent variables and outcome
... ... ... ... ...
Thus, the aim was to perform the first large, generalizable In assessing the association between baseline variables and baseline
comprehensive comparison of CKD in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and CKD, the dependent variable was CKD. In assessing the association
between CKD and prognosis, the dependent outcome was death from
HFrEF with regard to prevalence, clinical correlates and long-term
...
any cause. Mortality data were obtained by running the registry against
prognostic role.
... ..... ..........
Methods
European Journal of Heart Failure © 2017 European Society of
Cardiology
Patients and baseline characteristics
15
The Swedish HF registry (SwedeHF) has been described previously. It
... .
not required but patients are informed of entry into national quality
...
Statistics
1608 I. Löfman et al.
Variable HFpEF (n = 8875, 22.1%) HFmrEF (n = 8374, 20.8%) HFrEF (n = 22 981, 57.1%)
.............................. ................................ ...............................
% Missing eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60 eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60 eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60
...........................................................................................................................................
Demographics
† * * *
Age 0 75 (65–82) 82 (77–86) 71 (62–79) 81 (75–85) 67 (59–76) 79 (72–84)
† * * *
Female 0 49.0% 59.0% 34.2% 45.5% 25.0% 33.6%
† * * *
Single 5, 4/4, 3/4, 5 46.2% 55.1% 37.4% 47.5% 37.0% 42.8%
* * *
Independent living 41, 7/39, 3/40, 0 94.4% 91.2% 96.8% 92.7% 96.5% 93.8%
† *** * *
Cardiac care 0/0, 1/ 51.5% 50.1% 55.7% 52.2% 59.7% 55.8%
† * * *
Specialist f-u 7/5, 2/4, 9 57.0% 42.8% 71.7% 52.5% 80.1% 61.4%
† * * *
HF unit f-u 6, 7/5, 1/5, 1 29.4% 22.8% 42.5% 30.2% 54.3% 40.1%
Risk factors
† * * *
Hypertension 2, 4/2, 4/3, 4 54.9% 62.7% 45.2% 57.7% 39.3% 50.8%
† * * *
Diabetes mellitus 1, 0/0, 7/0, 8 22.9% 28.7% 20.5% 29.3% 20.5% 28.5%
† * * *
Smoking 27, 8/22, 2/20, 1 14.2% 6.7% 15.2% 8.1% 20.0% 9.9%
* * *
Alcohol 54, 4/45, 5/41, 0 4.5% 2.5% 4.5% 2.0% 6.6% 2.6%
over-consumption
Heart disease
* * *
Previous MI 60, 8/62, 4/62, 4 23.4% 30.2% 30.5% 40.1% 30.3% 45.4%
† * * *
IHD 3, 9/3, 6/4, 9 33.9% 42.9% 45.7% 55.2% 43.2% 60.4%
† * * *
AF 0, 8/0, 8/0, 7 54.7% 62.8% 47.9% 60.0% 42.0% 51.5%
† * * *
VHD 2, 6/2, 6/2, 6 27.4% 30.0% 18.1% 25.6% 17.2% 24.5%
Comorbidity
* * *
Previous stroke 60, 3/61, 8/61, 6 12.1% 16.8% 10.7% 15.7% 9.2% 14.8%
† *** * ***
Pulmonary disease 2, 6/2, 5/2, 7 22.0% 22.5% 16.4% 19.2% 15.7% 16.4%
Previous procedures
† *** *** *
Revascularization 2, 2/1, 8/ 1, 7 18.8% 19.6% 28.9% 29.4% 25.9% 31.7%
*** ** **
Valve intervention 1, 5/1, 1/1, 2 7.5% 7.6% 6.2% 7.4% 4.8% 5.5%
*** *** *
CRT 1, 1/0, 9 /0, 9 0.5% 0.4% 1.0% 1.2% 3.1% 4.4%
Characterization of HF
* * *
Hospitalization at 0 70.2% 78.9% 51.4% 67.9% 50.9% 64.1%
†
inclusion
† * * *
HF > 6 months 0, 9/0, 5/0, 7 40.3% 54.9% 38.5% 55.8% 36.4% 57.9%
†
NYHA class
* * *
I 37, 1/28, 1/24, 1 21.6% 11.1% 20.8% 9.2% 11.7% 5.4%
* * *
II 45.5% 43.2% 54.1% 49.3% 51.0% 37.6%
* * *
III 30.4% 41.4% 23.6% 38.4% 34.4% 50.4%
* * *
IV 2.4% 4.2% 1.5% 3.1% 2.9% 6.6%
*
LVEF 30–39% 0 47.3% 49.1%
*
LVEF <30% 52.7% 50.9%
CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; f-u, follow-up; HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction;
HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction;
MI, myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; VHD, valvular heart disease.
2 * ** ***
P-values comparing eGFR ≥60 vs. <60 mL/min.1.73 m within each ejection fraction group: P < 0.01, P < 0.05, not significant (P > 0.05).
Table 2 Physical signs, laboratory results and medical treatment in absence and presence of chronic kidney disease
Variable HFpEF (n = 8875, 22.1%) HFmrEF (n = 8374, 20.8%) HFrEF (n = 22 981, 57.1%)
% Missing eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60 eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60 eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60
...............................................................................................................................................................
Physical status
† *** * ***
Heart rate 7, 1/6, 8/6, 0 72 (63– 82) 71 (63– 82) 70 ( 61–80) 72 (64– 84) 72 (64– 84) 72 (64– 82)
* * *
Diastolic BP 1, 4/1, 0/1, 1 73 (65– 80) 70 (60– 80) 75 (65– 80) 70 (60– 80) 75 (65– 80) 70 (60– 80)
*** * *
BMI 53, 8/51, 9/51, 7 27 (23– 31) 27(23– 31) 27(24– 30) 26(23– 30) 26 (23– 30) 25 (23– 29 )
ECG
* * *
Non-sinus rhythm 1, 3/1, 3/1, 0 47.2 % 57.2 % 42.3 % 55.3 % 38.0 % 49.4 %
* * *
Left branch block 17, 5/17, 9/16, 6 6.5% 8.9% 13.0% 14.6% 22.7% 26.8%
*** * *
QRS width, ms 30, 5/30, 7/30, 3 94 (86–106) 96 (86–112) 98 (88–114) 100 (88–122) 106 (94–130) 112 (96–140)
Laboratory tests
† * * *
Hb, g/L 0 131 (120–143) 123 (112–135) 136 (124–147) 127 (115–139) 139 (127–150) 130 (118–142)
* * *
Creatinine 0 75 (65– 86) 119 (101–147) 78 (68– 90) 122 (105–149) 81 (70– 92) 125 (109–153)
* * *
Potassium 42, 1/39, 3/39, 4 4.0 (3.8–4.3) 4.1 (3.8–4.4) 4.1 (3.8–4.4) 4.2 (3.9–4.5) 4.2 (3.9– 4.4) 4.2 (3.9– 4.5)
* * *
NT-proBNP 69, 5/70, 4/68, 4 1644 (738– 3160) 3014 (1413– 5903) 1574 (606– 3465) 3747 (1760– 7840) 2346 (1044– 4936) 5040 (2288–10890)
Medication
* * *
ACE-inhibitor 0, 8/0, 6/0, 5 57.3% 46.5% 71.7% 55.0% 78.7% 63.7%
* * *
>50% Target dose 49, 3/36, 7/28, 6 73.3% 68.1% 77.6% 71.1% 80.3% 72.3%
* ** *
ARB 2, 0/1, 7/1, 9 19.2% 22.3% 19.8% 22.9% 19.4% 23.8%
* * *
>50% Target dose 79, 3/79, 0/79, 0 55.6% 45.5% 60.2% 45.2% 59.4% 43.8%
† * * *
RAASB 1, 1/0, 7/0, 5 75.3% 67.4% 90.1% 76.5% 95.4% 85.1%
† * *** *
Beta-blockers 0, 7/0, 5/0, 4 78.1% 81.3% 85.9% 86.8% 91.8% 89.9%
*** *** *
>50% Target dose 21, 4/14, 5/9, 8 64.4% 63.6% 63.6% 64.7% 65.7% 62.7%
*** * ***
Aldosterone 0, 9/0, 7/0, 7 26.0% 27.6% 21.0% 26.1% 33.3% 32.4%
†
antagonists
† * *** *
Digitalis 0, 7/0, 6/0, 6 19.6% 16.6% 15.6% 15.8% 18.8% 15.6%
† *** *** *
Statins 0, 7/0, 4/0, 5 38.2% 38.6% 47.6% 46.4% 46.9% 48.7%
† * * *
Nitrates 0, 9/0, 8/0, 7 13.8% 23.0% 10.9% 23.3% 9.6% 22.4%
† *** *** ***
Anticoagulant 0, 8/0, 6/0, 6 38.8% 39.6% 37.7% 39.5% 40.0% 38.8%
† * *** *
Antiplatelet 0, 7/0, 6/0, 6 44.1% 48.5% 51.2% 52.9% 48.9% 55.1%
HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BP, blood
pressure; BMI, body mass index; ECG, electrocardiogram; Hb, haemoglobin; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin
II receptor blockers; RAASB, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blockers.
2 * ** ***
P-values comparing eGFR ≥60 vs. <60 mL/min.1.73 m within each ejection fraction group: P < 0.01, P < 0.05, not significant (P > 0.05).
†
The 28 variables in the multiple imputation and multivariable analyses.
.. ..
but younger and less often female than HFpEF (Table 1
Analysis of interaction between CKD and HFpEF/HFmrEF/HFrEF was and the Supplementary material online, Table S1).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .
Results more often had HF with longer duration and were in a more severe
NYHA class regardless of EF.
Patients and baselines characteristics
In HFpEF and HFmrEF patients had higher systolic blood pres-
From May 11, 2000 until October 3, 2013, a total of 88 317 reg-
sures and in HFpEF slightly higher body mass index, with no major
istrations occurred in SwedeHF. After excluding repeat registra- differences in the presence vs. absence of CKD (Table 2 and the
Supplementary material online, Table S2). It was found that HFpEF
tions and applying the exclusion criteria above, a total of 40 230
had lower haemoglobin level than HFmrEF and HFrEF and in all
unique patients were included. Of these, 8875 (22%) were classi- groups the haemoglobin level decreased with lower kidney
function. N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
fied as HFpEF, 8374 (21%) as HFmrEF, and 22 981 (57%) as HFrEF
... ... ... ... ...
level was lowest in HFpEF and HFmrEF and highest in HFrEF, and
(Figure 1). approximately the double in CKD vs. non-CKD, regardless
and HFrEF (56% vs. 48% and 45%, respectively, P < 0.001). Patients
with HFmrEF were older and more often female than HFrEF,
5
according to the new HF types in the recent ESC HF guidelines.
There were several important findings. The associations between
CKD and characteristics such as greater age, female sex, and
greater severity of HF were similar in the three groups. However,
HFpEF stood out as different compared with HFmrEF and HFrEF,
which were more similar. In HFpEF, CKD was more common but
less important, with a weaker association with mortality, less
modification of risk by conventional HF risk markers, and with a
less discriminatory power for mortality.
In the present study, more than 50% had HFrEF. The proportions of
HFpEF and HFmrEF were equally common, with the proportion of
HFpEF being slightly lower than that in earlier studies. 18,19 We found a
proportion of CKD in HFpEF of 56%, which was higher than
Table 3 Mortality in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction
eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60 eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60 eGFR ≥60 eGFR <60
...........................................................................................................................................
* * *
1-year mortality 13.4% 22.6% 7.8% 22.4% 8.0% 23.0%
* 2
P < 0.001, comparing eGFR ≥60 vs. <60 mL/min.1.73 m within each ejection fraction group.
Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier curves for long-term mortality in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced
ejection fraction (HFrEF). eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
in HFrEF and HFmrEF and higher than that seen previously, 14,20 and
..
diabetes, an important contributor to CKD, which has been
consistent with the unselective nature of SwedeHF compared with
Table 4 Association between chronic kidney disease and mortality according to ejection fraction category
...........................................................................................................................................
Adjusted age and gender 1.41 1.32–1.56 1.73 1.61–1.87 1.82 1.74–1.90
*
Adjusted all baseline variables 1.32 1.24–1.42 1.51 1.40–1.63 1.49 1.42–1.56
CI, confidence interval; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with
reduced ejection fraction; HR, hazard ratio.
* Age, gender, civil status, cardiology ward, specialist follow-up, heart failure team follow-up, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation,
valvular heart disease, pulmonary disease, revascularization, hospitalization at diagnosis, heart failure duration >6 months, New York Heart Association class, haemoglobin, systolic
blood pressure, heart rate, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blockers, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, digoxin, statins, nitrates, oral anticoagulants, and antiplatelet
treatment.
Figure 4 Estimated glomerular filtration rate as predictor of 1-year mortality: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area
under the curve. HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF,
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
......................................................
predictor of death in patients with HFpEF than in HFrEF in the
4 when adjusting for multiple covariates. Together, these findings
extensive meta-analysis of Damman et al. with over 80 000
suggest that while CKD is common in HFpEF, it represents one
patients and was thought to be caused by underlying disease such
of many co-morbidities and may have more of a bystander role
as hypertension and diabetes, associated with impaired GFR and
worse outcome. This was however contradicted by the Meta- than it does in HFmrEF or HFrEF, where it may be more
Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) meta- intricately tied to the HF syndrome itself and its severity.
analysis showing a lower mortality rate and lower association
between CKD and death in patients with HFpEF than in HFrEF, Although the present study improves the understanding of
4 24 25
which is in line with our results. , , CKD in different types of HF, we can only speculate about
underlying mechanisms. In HFrEF the cardiorenal syndrome
has been well described. The presence of CKD may capture
In the present study, CKD was strongly associated with mortality
patients with a more advanced HF stage. Chronic kidney
4
in all EF groups, in keeping with earlier studies. In the crude disease seems to be secondary to both backward and forward
analyses of patients with CKD, there were no differences in short- failure, sympathetic and neurohormonal activation, and
and long-term mortality between the three EF groups. In the 1
contributes to further cardiac deterioration.
absence of CKD, HFpEF was associated with considerably greater
mortality than HFmrEF or HFrEF. This implies similarities between
HFrEF and HFmrEF and a distinction vs. HFpEF. In HFpEF, the link appears less clear. Both CKD and HFpEF
may be unrelated reflections of the greater age and co-morbidity
burden or they may evolve independently of one another or
... ....
secondary to the same risk factors. Earlier studies have shown As a descriptive real-life study the present study was not designed
..
HFpEF where co-morbidity induces an inflammatory state with causality. We defined CKD as eGFR ≤60 mL/min.1.73 m
.
though the current actual definition of kidney disease also involves
...
microvascular dysfunction potentially leading to both cardiac and
–28 This may have led to some misclas-
..
32
renal fibrosis.26
...
measurement of albuminuria.
.. .
Increased central venous pressure has been found to be associ-
... ...
4
sification, but is in line with earlier studies of HF and CKD. All
ated with impaired renal function both in patients with reduced
... ... .
eGFR data were at baseline only and we did not have access to
and preserved EF.29 It has been proposed that HFpEF patients
... ...
to be strong risk factors for new-onset HFpEF30 and albuminuria
... ...
...
trophy and cardiac remodelling.26
... ... ...
ommend the use of RAAS inhibitors in patients with eGFR © 2017 The Authors
25
European Journal of Heart Failure © 2017 European Society of
previous observational data suggest RAAS
<30 mL/min.1.73 m ,
Cardiology
.. ... .
31
in severe renal failure, a question that is particularly relevant
... ... ... .... .
Limitations
3. Ronco C, Haapio M, House AA, Anavekar N, Bellomo R. Cardiorenal
syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1527–1539.
in HFmrEF and HFrEF, it was less strongly associated with mortality and
4. Damman K, Valente MA, Voors AA, O’Connor CM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Hillege
had less prognostic discrimination in this subset of patients. HL. Renal impairment, worsening renal function, and outcome in patients with
heart failure: an updated meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2014;35:455– 469.
5. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Falk V,
González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoy-
Supplementary Information annopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GM, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka
F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treat-ment
of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of
acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Car-diology (ESC).
Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:891– 975.
version of this article:
6. Hillege HL, Nitsch D, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S,
Granger CB, Michelson EL, Östergren J, Cornel JH, de Zeeuw D, Pocock S,
Figure S1. Association between renal function and mortality in van Veldhuisen D. Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad
spectrum of patients with heart failure. Circulation 2006;113:671– 678.
different EF groups.
7. Lam CS, Solomon SD. The middle child in heart failure: heart failure with
Table S1. Baseline characteristics in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and mid-range ejection fraction (40– 50%). Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:1049–1055.
HFrEF and different eGFR strata.
Acknowledgements
Funding
References
1. Metra M, Cotter G, Gheorghiade M, Dei Cas L, Voors AA. The role of the
kidney in heart failure. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2135– 2142.
8. Lund LH. Heart Failure With ‘mid-range’ ejection fraction – new opportunities. J Card Fail 2016;22:769– 771.
9. Mentz RJ, Kelly JP, von Lueder TG, Voors AA, Lam CS, Cowie MR, Kjeldsen K, Jankowska EA, Atar D, Butler J, Fiuzat M, Zannad F, Pitt B, O’Connor CM.
Noncardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:2281– 2293.
10. Lund LH, Donal E, Oger E, Hage C, Persson H, Haugen-Lofman I, Ennezat PV, Sportouch-Dukhan C, Drouet E, Daubert JC, Linde C. Association between cardiovascular vs. non-
cardiovascular co-morbidities and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:992–1001.
11. Cleland JG, Swedberg K, Follath F, Komajda M, Cohen-Solal A, Aguilar JC, Dietz R, Gavazzi A, Hobbs R, Korewicki J, Madeira HC, Moiseyev VS, Preda I,
van Gilst WH, Widimsky J, Freemantle N, Eastaugh J, Mason J. The EuroHeart failure survey programme—a survey on the quality of care among patients
with heart failure in Europe Part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis. Eur Heart J 2003;24:442– 463.
12. Komajda M, Carson PE, Hetzel S, McKelvie R, McMurray J, Ptaszynska A, Zile MR, DeMets D, Massie BM. Factors associated with outcome in heart failure
with preserved ejection fraction: findings from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-PRESERVE). Circ Heart Fail 2011;4:
27– 35.
13. Quiroz R, Doros G, Shaw P, Liang CS, Gauthier DF, Sam F. Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction versus
reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in an urban cohort. Am
JCardiol 2014;113:691–696.
14. Ather S, Chan W, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Ramasubbu K, Zachariah AA, Wehrens XH, Deswal A. Impact of noncardiac comorbidities on morbidity and mortality in a
predominantly male population with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:998–1005.
15. Jonsson A, Edner M, Alehagen U, Dahlstrom U. Heart failure registry: a valuable tool for improving the management of patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart
Fail 2010;12:25– 31.
16. Valente MA, Hillege HL, Navis G, Voors AA, Dunselman PH, van Veldhuisen DJ, Damman K. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
equation outperforms the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate in chronic systolic heart failure. Eur J Heart
Fail 2014;16:86– 94.
17. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE, Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbély A, Édes I, Handoko ML,
Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG, Brutsart DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left
ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2539– 2550.
18. Solomon SD, Anavekar N, Skali H, McMurray JJ, Swedberg K, Yusuf S, Granger CB, Michelson EL, Wang D, Pocock S, Pfeffer MA. Influence of ejection
fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients. Circulation 2005;112:3738– 3744.
19. Borlaug BA, Redfield MM. Diastolic and systolic heart failure are dis-tinct phenotypes within the heart failure spectrum. Circulation 2011;123: 2006– 2014.
...................................................................................................................
20. Yancy CW, Lopatin M, Stevenson LW, De Marco T, Fonarow GC. Clinical presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with acute decompensated heart
failure with preserved systolic function: a report from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE)
Database. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:76– 84.
21. Smith DH, Thorp ML, Gurwitz JH, McManus DD, Goldberg RJ, Allen LA, Hsu G, Hee Song S, Magid DJ, Go AS. Chronic kidney disease and outcomes in heart fail-ure with preserved
versus reduced ejection fraction: the Cardiovascular Research Network PRESERVE Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013;6:333– 342.
22. McNallan SM, Singh M, Chamberlain AM, Kane RL, Dunlay SM, Redfield MM, Weston SA, Roger VL. Frailty and healthcare utilization among patients with heart failure in
the community. JACC Heart Fail 2013;1:135–141.
23. Hogg K, Swedberg K, McMurray J. Heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function; epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. J Am
Coll Cardiol 2004;43:317– 327.
24. Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure. The survival of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: an individual
patient data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1750–1757.
25. McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Tarantini L, Squire I, Komajda M, Bayes-Genis A, Gotsman I, Whalley G, Earle N, Poppe KK, Doughty RN. Renal dysfunction in patients with
heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: impact of the new Chronic Kidney Disease– Epidemiology Collaboration Group formula. Circ Heart Fail
2012;5:309– 314.
26. Gori M, Senni M, Gupta DK, Charytan DM, Kraigher-Krainer E, Pieske B, Claggett B, Shah AM, Santos AB, Zile MR, Voors AA, McMurray JJ, Packer M,
Bransford T, Lefkowitz M, Solomon SD. Association between renal function and cardiovascular structure and function in heart failure with preserved ejection
fraction. Eur Heart J 2014;35:3442– 3451.
27. Paulus WJ, Tschope C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling
through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:263– 271.
28. Ter Maaten JM, Damman K, Verhaar MC, Paulus WJ, Duncker DJ, Cheng C, van Heerebeek L, Hillege HL, Lam CS, Navis G, Voors AA. Connecting heart failure with
preserved ejection fraction and renal dysfunction: the role of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:588– 598.
29. Damman K, van Deursen VM, Navis G, Voors AA, van Veldhuisen DJ, Hillege HL. Increased central venous pressure is associated with impaired renal
function and mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:582– 588.
30. Brouwers FP, de Boer RA, van der Harst P, Voors AA, Gansevoort RT, Bakker SJ, Hillege HL, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH. Incidence and epidemiol-
ogy of new onset heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a community-based cohort: 11-year follow-up of PREVEND. Eur Heart J
2013;34:1424–1431.
31. Edner M, Benson L, Dahlstrom U, Lund LH. Association between renin–angiotensin system antagonist use and mortality in heart failure with severe renal
insufficiency: a prospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Eur Heart J 2015;36:2318 – 2326.
32. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:1–150.
Review
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00191
A Potential Role of Salmonella
Infection in the Onset of
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Schultz BM, Paduro CA, Salazar GA, Salazar-Echegarai FJ, Sebastián VP, Riedel CA, Kalergis AM, Alvarez-Lobos M
and Bueno SM (2017) A Potential Role of Salmonella Infection in the Onset of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front.
Immunol. 8:191.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00191
Edited by:
Eric Cox,
Susan M. Bueno
sbueno@bio.puc.cl;
Manuel Alvarez-Lobos
manalvarez@gmail.co
m
Citation:
influence or contribute to the onset or development of the disease in susceptible
individuals. The infection with pathogenic bacteria is a key factor that can influence the
Inflammatory bowel development and severity of this disease. Here, we present a comprehensive review of
disease (IBD) includes a studies performed in human and mice susceptible to IBD, which supports the notion that
set of pathologies that infection with bacterial pathogens, such as Salmonella, could promote the onset of IBD
result from a deregu-lated due to permanent changes in the intestinal microbiota, disruption of the epithelial barrier
immune response that and alterations of the intestinal immune response after infection.
may affect any portion of
the gastrointestinal tract. Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, gut microbiota, Salmonella enterica
The most prevalent and serovar Typhimurium, innate immune response, virulence factors
Figure 1 | Normal intestinal epithelium versus altered intestinal epithelium observed in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). (A) The normal intestine presents a high
secretion of bactericidal molecules (defensins, REGIIIγ, and IgA) as mechanisms of defense against pathogenic bacteria. The commensal microbiota inhibits the access of
pathogens to the epithelial barrier by competing for nutrients, maintaining homeostasis of the epithelial barrier, and supporting the host immune response. The commensal
microbiota is composed of mainly Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and a lower percentage of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. They promote the secretion of mucus and
antimicrobial peptides [short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), H2S] and the activation of some pathway of immune system such as the activation of macrophages and dendritic cells
in lamina propria, and the production of cytokines such as IL-6, IL-23, and IL-12, which activates Th1 or Th17 cells to produce cytokines acting on intestinal epithelium. (B)
The intestine of IBD patient has a deregulated response to commensal microbiota by a decrease in the secretion of antimicrobial peptides such as α-defensins and
increase in REGIIIγ as compensatory effect; these effects have relation with defect in Paneth and goblet cells. IBD patients showed lower Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes but
have increased amounts of Proteobacterias resulting in a decrease production of SCFA, mucus, and increased inflammation. The epithelium produces an abnormal
amount of IgG against commensal microbiota instead IgA. Macrophages produce higher amounts of cytokines that overstimulate Th1 or Th17 cells, which secrete pro-
inflammatory cytokines to epithelium.
different routes (83, 84). The main route is through the activation
of virulence factors encoded in SPI-1. A second route of inva-sion
requires the rupture of tight junctions of the epithelial cells, which
changes the basal permeability of the intestinal barrier (85).
wound infection, is still conflicting because it decreases the
number of intestinal bacteria and alters the normal composition Finally, there is another entry through CX3CR1+ DCs (86)
of the microbiota (68). Moreover, treatment with antibiotics
increases the susceptibility of the patient to acquire an infection
by Clostridium difficile (68, 69).
Along the same line, some studies have shown that antibiotic
therapy is functional in UC and in CD, and the therapy works
better if given orally. Two meta-analysis supports the role of the
antibiotics in induction of the remission of IBD (70), specifi-cally
UC (71). This observation agrees with a study performed in some
pediatric patients with severe refractory UC, where the children
receive a triple therapy for 2–3 weeks with amoxicillin,
metronidazole, and doxycycline in children over 7 years of age.
This study shows that the treatment induced remission in 47% of
the patients and the effects observed depend on the physiological
characteristics of the patients and the current treatment used to
ameliorate the symptoms (69). A systematic review shows that the
induction of remission can occur in both CD and UC patients, but
that is still not sufficient information to recommend a type or a
cocktail of antibiotic to treat effectively the disease (72). In
summary, most of the processes described above, which can pro-
mote the onset and severity of IBD, are related to proper bacterial
location and clearance in the intestine. In the next section, we will
discuss how pathogenic bacterial infection could trigger IBD in
susceptible individuals.
Figure 2 | Effect of Salmonella infection in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. In genetically susceptible to IBD patients, many parameters are
disrupted. (A) Paneth cells have an impaired secretion of antimicrobial peptides showing a decrease in the amounts of α-defensins, as well as increased
amounts of REGIIIγ, which is associated with impaired protection against pathogens. (B) Plasma cells have a polarized antibodies’ secretion to the production
of IgG antibodies targeting the individual’s own microbiota. Beside this, the proportions of commensal microorganisms present are unbalanced related to a
healthy host. Due to this imbalance, there is a decrease production of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), which generates an increase in inflammation. Taken
together, these effects generate an environment more vulnerable to further infection. Furthermore, (C) S. Typhimurium recruits neutrophils to the lumen, which
generates ROS, producing tetrathionate in the intestinal lumen; this compound is used by Salmonella as electron acceptor, which gives advantage to S.
Typhimurium over the microbiota. (D) Salmonella infection is produced by the entry through DCs interspersed in the epithelial barrier or M cells that recognize it
through glycoprotein-2, accessing to the Peyer’s patches. (E) Salmonella can also get into the epithelial cells forming membrane ruffling or through disruptions
of tight junctions caused by itself and in this case especially in inflamed epithelium of IBD patients. (F) In the basolateral side, Salmonella can be recognized by
TLR5 stimulating an increased production of NF-κβ, which correlates with an enhanced recruitment of neutrophils, finally once within the epithelial cells,
Salmonella blocks the autophagosome pathway avoiding its own degradation.
All these effects produce an increase in inflammation after Commensal microbiota is mostly fermentative and produces at
bacterial infection because of the structure loss of the intestinal least three SCFAs, which are mainly acetate, propionate, and
mucosa, producing diarrhea with concomitant loss of liquid and butyrate (101). The concentration and distribution of these
electrolytes (97). This response against foreign microorgan- compounds vary along the gut and exert different effects on
isms must be controlled to reduce tissue damage or to prevent a colonization of pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella. In the
systemic infection, as it could be the case of S. Typhimurium ileum, there are higher concentrations of acetate, which induce
the expression of genes within SPI-1, allowing the invasion of
the ileum (101). Moreover, propionate and butyrate are present
S. Typhimurium INFECTION:
PREVIOUS OR AFTER IBD ONSET?
These proteins are required for the correct function of NOD2 and
antigen presentation (125). Mutation in this gene generates
* Typhimurium (122).
REFERENCES
129). Even more, it is possible that through this mechanism, S. 11. Anderson CA, Boucher G, Lees CW, Franke A, D’Amato M, Taylor
Typhimurium can accelerate the development of the disease in KD, et al. Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci,
people with genetic susceptibility. Due to the factors mentioned increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47. Nat Genet (2011)
above, it is possible that in IBD patients will be more 43:246–52. doi:10.1038/ng.764
susceptible to suffer a more aggressive infection by S.
Typhimurium or even to develop a persistent infection, due to 12. Franke A, McGovern DP, Barrett JC, Wang K, Radford-Smith GL,
Ahmad T, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of
the baseline inflamma-tion and impaired intestinal
confirmed Crohn’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet (2010) 42:1118–
environment. Therefore, the devel-opment of new methods that 25. doi:10.1038/ ng.717
could prevent early colonization with this pathogen in this type
of patients is a challenge for future research. 13. Ishihara S, Aziz MM, Yuki T, Kazumori H, Kinoshita Y.
Inflammatory bowel disease: review from the aspect of genetics.
J Gastroenterol (2009) 44:1097–108. doi:10.1007/s00535-009-0141-8
14. Duerr RH, Taylor KD, Brant SR, Rioux JD, Silverberg MS, Daly MJ, et
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS al. A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel
disease gene. Science (2006) 314:1461–3. doi:10.1126/science.1135245
15. Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, Cho JH, Duerr RH, Rioux JD, et
All authors listed have made substantial, direct, and intellectual al. Genome-wide association defines more than thirty distinct susceptibility
contribution to the work and approved it for publication. The loci for Crohn’s disease. Nat Genet (2009) 40:955–62.
doi:10.1038/NG.175. Genome-wide
authors are grateful to Pamela A. Nieto, Ph.D., who edited this
manuscript.
16. Hampe J, Franke A, Rosenstiel P, Till A, Teuber M, Huse K, et al. A
genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a
suscep-tibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nat Genet (2007)
39:207–11. doi:10.1038/ng1954
FUNDING
17. Massey DCO, Parkes M. Genome-wide association scanning highlights
two autophagy genes, ATG16L1 and IRGM, as being significantly associated
This study was supported by grant numbers 1140010, 1150862, with Crohn’s disease. Autophagy (2007) 3:649–51. doi:10.4161/auto.5075
1161525, and 1131012 from the National Fund for Scientific and 18. Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H, Lesage S, Cézard JP, Belaiche
Technological Development (FONDECYT) program of the J, et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with
Ministry of Education of Chile and grant Millennium Institute in susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature (2001) 411:599–603.
doi:10.1038/35079107
Immunology and Immunotherapy P09/016-F, from the Iniciativa
Científica Milenio of the Ministry of Economy of Chile. 19. Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, Nimmo ER, Satsangi J. Beyond gene
dis-covery in inflammatory bowel disease: the emerging role of
epigenetics. Gastroenterology (2013) 145:293–308.
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.050
21. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Hao L, Medzhitov R. Role of toll-like receptors 32. Turner JR. Molecular basis of epithelial barrier regulation: from
in spontaneous commensal-dependent colitis. Immunity (2006) 25:319–29. basic mech-anisms to clinical application. Am J Pathol (2006) 169:1901–9.
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.06.010 doi:10.2353/ ajpath.2006.060681
22. Fournier BM, Parkos CA. The role of neutrophils during intestinal 33. Secondulfo M, de Magistris L, Fiandra R, Caserta L, Belletta M, Tartaglione
inflammation. Mucosal Immunol (2012) 5:354–66. doi:10.1038/ mi.2012.24
MT, et al. Intestinal and their permeability first degree in Crohn’s rel-atives
23. Spalinger MR, Rogler G, Scharl M. Crohn’s disease: loss of disease patients. Dig Liver Dis (2001) 33(8):680–5. doi:10.1016/ S1590-
tolerance or a disorder of autophagy? Dig Dis (2014) 32:370–7. 8658(01)80045-1
doi:10.1159/000358140
24. Van der Sluis M, De Koning BA, De Bruijn AC, Velcich A, 34. Brandtzaeg P. Mucosal immunity: induction, dissemination, and
Meijerink JP, Van Goudoever JB, et al. Muc2-deficient mice spontaneously effector functions. Scand J Immunol (2009) 70:505–15. doi:10.1111/
develop colitis, indicating that MUC2 is critical for colonic protection. j.1365-3083.2009.02319.x
Gastroenterology (2006) 131:117–29. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.020 35. Nagalingam NA, Lynch SV. Role of the microbiota in
inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2012) 18:968–84.
25. Wenzel UA, Magnusson MK, Rydström A, Jonstrand C, Hengst J, doi:10.1002/ibd.21866
Johansson ME, et al. Spontaneous colitis in Muc2-deficient mice reflects 36. Frehn L, Jansen A, Bennek E, Mandic AD, Temizel I, Tischendorf S, et al.
clinical and cellular features of active ulcerative colitis. PLoS One (2014)
9:e100217. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100217 Distinct patterns of IgG and IgA against food and microbial antigens in
serum and feces of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. PLoS One
26. Petersson J, Schreiber O, Hansson GC, Gendler SJ, Velcich A, (2014) 9:e106750. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106750
Lundberg JO, et al. Importance and regulation of the colonic mucus barrier
in a mouse model of colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2011) 37. Homsak E, Micetić-Turk D, Bozic B. Autoantibodies pANCA,
300:G327–33. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00422.2010 GAB and PAB in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence, characteristics
and diagnostic value. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2010) 122:19–25.
27. Babyatsky MW, Rossiter G, Podolsky DK. Expression of doi:10.1007/ s00508-010-1344-y
transforming growth factors alpha and beta in colonic mucosa in
inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology (1996) 110:975–84. 38. Israeli E, Grotto I, Gilburd B, Balicer RD, Goldin E, Wiik A, et al.
doi:10.1053/gast.1996.v110. pm8613031 Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
as pre-dictors of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut (2005) 54:1232–6.
28. Coccia M, Harrison OJ, Schiering C, Asquith MJ, Becher B, Powrie doi:10.1136/ gut.2004.060228
F, et al. IL-1b mediates chronic intestinal inflammation by promoting the
accumulation of IL-17A secreting innate lymphoid cells and CD4+ Th17 39. Bertin D, Grimaud JC, Lesavre N, Benelmouloud C, Desjeux A,
cells. J Exp Med (2012) 209:1595–609. doi:10.1084/jem.20111453 Garcia S, et al. Targeting tissular immune response improves diagnostic
performance of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) in
29. Yamamoto M, Yoshizaki K, Kishimoto T, Ito H. IL-6 is required for Crohn’s disease. PLoS One (2013) 8(11):e80433.
the devel-opment of Th1 cell-mediated murine colitis. J Immunol (2000) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080433
164:4878–82. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4878
30. Kuhn KA, Manieri NA, Liu TC, Stappenbeck TS. IL-6 stimulates
40. Damaskos D, Kolios G. Probiotics and prebiotics in inflammatory
bowel disease: microflora “on the scope”. Br J Clin Pharmacol (2008)
intestinal epithelial proliferation and repair after injury. PLoS One (2014)
9:e114195. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114195 65:453–67. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03096.x
47. Marcus SL, Brumell JH, Pfeifer CG, Finlay BB. Salmonella
pathogenicity islands: big virulence in small packages. Microbes Infect
(2000) 2:145–56. doi:10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00273-2
48. Galan JE. Salmonella interactions with host cells: type III secretion at
31. Fite A, Macfarlane S, Furrie E, Bahrami B, Cummings JH, Steinke work. Biology (Basel) (2001) 17:53–86. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.53
DT, et al. Longitudinal analyses of gut mucosal microbiotas in ulcerative
colitis in relation to patient age and disease severity and duration. J Clin 49. Kyrova K, Stepanova H, Rychlik I, Faldyna M, Volf J. SPI-1 encoded
Microbiol (2013) 51:849–56. doi:10.1128/JCM.02574-12
genes of Salmonella Typhimurium influence differential polarization of
32. Latella G, Fiocchi C, Caprili R. News from the “5th international porcine alveolar macrophages in vitro. BMC Vet Res (2012) 8:115.
meeting on inflammatory bowel diseases” CAPRI 2010. J Crohns Colitis doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-115
(2010) 4:690–702. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2010.08.002
33. Hansen R, Cameron FL, Hold GL, El-Omar EM, Russell RK. 33. Hensel M. Evolution of pathogenicity islands of Salmonella
Inflammatory bowel disease. Paediatr Child Health (Oxford) (2010) enterica. Int J Med Microbiol (2004) 294:95–102.
20:473–8. doi:10.1016/j. paed.2010.04.005 doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2004.06.025
34. Rajilić-Stojanović M, Shanahan F, Guarner F, de Vos WM. 34. Broz P, Ohlson MB, Monack DM. Innate immune response to
Phylogenetic analysis of dysbiosis in ulcerative colitis during remission. Salmonella typhimurium, a model enteric pathogen. Gut Microbes (2012)
Inflamm Bowel Dis (2013) 19:481–8. doi:10.1097/MIB.0b013e31827fec6d 3:62–70. doi:10.4161/gmic.19141
35. Nemoto H, Kataoka K, Ishikawa H, Ikata K, Arimochi H, Iwasaki T, et 35. Khan CM. The dynamic interactions between Salmonella and the
al. Reduced diversity and imbalance of fecal microbiota in patients with ulcer-
microbiota, within the challenging niche of the gastrointestinal tract. Int
ative colitis. Dig Dis Sci (2012) 57:2955–64. doi:10.1007/s10620-012-2236-y
Sch Res Notices (2014) 2014:846049. doi:10.1155/2014/846049
36. Nitzan O, Elias M, Peretz A, Saliba W. Role of antibiotics for
treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol (2016)
22:1078–87. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1078
37. Turner D, Levine A, Kolho KL, Shaoul R, Ledder O. Combination of oral
antibiotics may be effective in severe pediatric ulcerative colitis: a prelim-inary
report. J Crohns Colitis (2014) 8:1464–70. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.
05.010
41. McPhee JB, Small CL, Reid-Yu SA, Brannon JR, Le Moual H, Coombes
BK. Host defense peptide resistance contributes to colonization and max-
imal intestinal pathology by Crohn’s disease-associated adherent-invasive
85. Köhler H, Sakaguchi T, Hurley BP, Kase BA, Reinecker HC, 96. Yu Y, Zeng H, Lyons S, Carlson A, Merlin D, Neish AS, et al.
McCormick BA. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium regulates TLR5-mediated activation of p38 MAPK regulates epithelial IL-8
intercellular junction proteins and facilitates transepithelial neutrophil and expression via posttran-scriptional mechanism. Am J Physiol Gastrointest
bacterial passage. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2007) Liver Physiol (2003) 285:G282–90. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00503.2002
293(1):G178–87. doi:10.1152/ ajpgi.00535.2006
97. Bueno SM, Riquelme S, Riedel CA, Kalergis AM. Mechanisms used
86. Niess JH, Brand S, Gu X, Landsman L, Jung S, McCormick BA, et al. by virulent Salmonella to impair dendritic cell function and evade adaptive
CX3CR1-mediated dendritic cell access to the intestinal lumen and bacterial immunity. Immunology (2012) 137:28–36. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2012.
clearance. Science (2005) 307:254–8. doi:10.1126/science.1102901 03614.x
91. Ye Z, Petrof EO, Boone D, Claud EC, Sun J. Salmonella effector AvrA regula-
101. Lawhon SD, Maurer R, Suyemoto M, Altier C. Intestinal short-chain
tion of colonic epithelial cell inflammation by deubiquitination. Am J Pathol fatty acids alter Salmonella Typhimurium invasion gene expression and
virulence through BarA/SirA. Mol Microbiol (2002) 46(5):1451–64.
(2007) 171:882–92. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2007.070220 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03268.x
105. Winter SE, Thiennimitr P, Winter MG, Butler BP, Huseby DL,
Crawford RW, et al. Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron 120. Gersemann M, Stange EF, Wehkamp J. From intestinal stem cells to
acceptor for Salmonella. Nature (2010) 467:426–9. inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol (2011) 17:3198–203.
doi:10.1038/nature09415 doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i27.3198
121. Conway KL, Kuballa P, Song JH, Patel KK, Castoreno AB, Yilmaz
106. Thiennimitr P, Winter SE, Bäumler AJ. Salmonella, the host and its OH, et al. Atg16l1 is required for autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells
microbiota. Curr Opin Microbiol (2012) 15:108–14. doi:10.1016/j. and protection of mice from Salmonella infection. Gastroenterology (2013)
mib.2011.10.002 145:1347–57. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.035
107. Gill N, Ferreira RB, Antunes LC, Willing BP, Sekirov I, Al-Zahrani
F, et al. Neutrophil elastase alters the murine gut microbiota resulting in 122. Gomes LC, Dikic I. Autophagy in antimicrobial immunity. Mol Cell
enhanced Salmonella colonization. PLoS One (2012) 7:e49646. (2014) 54:224–33. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.009
doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0049646 123. Kuballa P, Huett A, Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Xavier RJ. Impaired
autophagy of an intracellular pathogen induced by a Crohn’s disease
108. Sartor RB. Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases. associated ATG16L1 variant. PLoS One (2008) 3(10):e3391.
Gastroenterology (2008) 134:577–94. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.059 doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0003391
109. Qiu H, Sun X, Sun M, He C, Li Z, Liu Z. Serum bacterial toxins are
related to the progression of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand 124. Homer CR, Richmond AL, Rebert NA, Achkar JP, McDonald C.
J Gastroenterol (2014) 49:826–33. doi:10.3109/00365521.2014.919018 ATG16L1 and NOD2 interact in an autophagy-dependent antibacterial
pathway impli-cated in Crohn’s disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology
110. Jess T, Simonsen J, Nielsen NM, Jørgensen KT, Bager P, Ethelberg S, et
(2010) 139:1630–41. e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.006
al. Enteric Salmonella or Campylobacter infections and the risk of inflammatory
bowel disease. Gut (2011) 60:318–24. doi:10.1136/gut.2010.223396
125. Cooney R, Baker J, Brain O, Danis B, Pichulik T, Allan P, et al.
111. Alvarez-Lobos M, Pizarro DP, Palavecino CE, Espinoza A, NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing
Sebastián VP, Alvarado JC, et al. Role of Salmonella enterica exposure in bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat Med (2010) 16:90–7.
Chilean Crohn’s disease patients. World J Gastroenterol (2013) 19:5855– doi:10.1038/ nm.2069
62. doi:10.3748/wjg. v19.i35.5855
126. Bueno SM, González PA, Carreño LJ, Tobar JA, Mora GC, Pereda
112. Stecher B, Chaffron S, Käppeli R, Hapfelmeier S, Freedrich S, Weber CJ, et al. The capacity of Salmonella to survive inside dendritic cells and
TC, et al. Like will to like: abundances of closely related species can predict prevent anti-gen presentation to T cells is host specific. Immunology (2008)
suscepti-bility to intestinal colonization by pathogenic and commensal bacteria. 124:522–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02805.x
PLoS Pathog (2010) 6(1):e1000711. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000711
113. Honko AN, Mizel SB. Effects of flagellin on innate and adaptive 127. Voedisch S, Koenecke C, David S, Herbrand H, Förster R, Rhen M,
immunity. Immunol Res (2005) 33:83–101. doi:10.1385/IR:33:1:083 et al. Mesenteric lymph nodes confine dendritic cell-mediated
114. Roggenbuck D, Hausdorf G, Martinez-Gamboa L, Reinhold D, dissemination of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and limit
systemic disease in mice. Infect Immun (2009) 77:3170–80.
Büttner T, Jungblut PR, et al. Identification of GP2, the major zymogen
doi:10.1128/IAI.00272-09
granule mem-brane glycoprotein, as the autoantigen of pancreatic
antibodies in Crohn’s disease. Gut (2009) 58:1620–8.
doi:10.1136/gut.2008.162495 128. Godinez I, Raffatellu M, Chu H, Paixão TA, Haneda T, Santos RL,
et al. Interleukin-23 orchestrates mucosal responses to Salmonella enterica
serotype Typhimurium in the intestine. Infect Immun (2009) 77:387–98.
115. Vaishnava S, Behrendt CL, Ismail AS, Eckmann L, Hooper LV.
doi:10.1128/IAI.00933-08
Paneth cells directly sense gut commensals and maintain homeostasis at the
intestinal host-microbial interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008)
105:20858–63. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808723105 129. Coburn B, Grassl GA, Finlay BB. Salmonella, the host and disease:
a brief review. Immunol Cell Biol (2007) 85:112–8.
116. Wehkamp J. Reduced Paneth cell alphadefensins in ileal Crohn’s disease. doi:10.1038/sj.icb.7100007
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005) 102:18129–34. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505256102
117. Salzman NH, Chou MM, de Jong H, Liu L, Porter EM, Paterson Y. Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was con-
Enteric Salmonella infection inhibits Paneth cell antimicrobial peptide ducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be
expression. Infect Immun (2003) 71(3):1109–15. construed as a potential conflict of interest.
doi:10.1128/IAI.71.3.1109
118. Begun J, Lassen KG, Jijon HB, Baxt LA, Goel G, Heath RJ, et al.
Integrated genomics of Crohn’s disease risk variant identifies a role for Copyright © 2017 Schultz, Paduro, Salazar, Salazar-Echegarai, Sebastián, Riedel,
CLEC12A in antibacterial autophagy. Cell Rep (2015) 11:1905–18. Kalergis, Alvarez-Lobos and Bueno. This is an open-access article distributed under
doi:10.1016/ j.celrep.2015.05.045 the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribu-
tion or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or
119. Martinez Rodriguez NR, Eloi MD, Huynh A, Dominguez T, Lam AH, licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in
Carcamo-Molina D, et al. Expansion of Paneth cell population in response accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Grace McHugh§*1, Victoria Simms*2, Ethel Dauya1, Tsitsi Bandason1, Prosper Chonzi3, Dafni Metaxa2, Shungu
Munyati1, Kusum Nathoo4, Hilda Mujuru4, Katharina Kranzer1,5 and Rashida A. Ferrand*1,2
§
Corresponding author: G. McHugh, Biomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Rd, Harare, Zimbabwe. (graceandandre@gmail.com)
*All authors contributed equally
Abstract
Introduction: Decentralized HIV care for adults does not appear to compromise clinical outcomes. HIV care for children poses
additional clinical and social complexities. We conducted a prospective cohort study to investigate clinical outcomes in children aged
6–15 years who registered for HIV care at seven primary healthcare clinics (PHCs) in Harare, Zimbabwe.
Methods: Participants were recruited between January 2013 and December 2014 and followed for 18 months. Rates of and
reasons for mortality, hospitalization and unscheduled PHC attendances were ascertained. Cox proportional modelling was
used to determine the hazard of death, unscheduled attendances and hospitalization.
Results: We recruited 385 participants, median age 11 years (IQR: 9–13) and 52% were female. The median CD4 count was
3
375 cells/mm (IQR: 215–599) and 77% commenced ART over the study period, with 64% of those who had viral load measured
achieving an HIV viral load <400 copies/ml. At 18 months, 4% of those who started ART vs. 24% of those who remained ART-naïve
were lost-to-follow-up (p < 0.001). Hospitalization and mortality rates were low (8.14/100 person-years (pyrs) and 2.86/100 pyrs,
respectively). There was a high rate of unscheduled PHC attendances (34.94/100 pyrs), but only 7% resulted in hospitalization.
3
Respiratory disease was the major cause of hospitalization, unscheduled attendances and death. CD4 count <350cells/mm was a
risk factor for hospitalization (aHR 3.6 (95%CI 1.6–8.2)).
Conclusions: Despite only 64% of participants achieving virological suppression, clinical outcomes were good and high rates
of retention in care were observed. This demonstrates that in an era moving towards differentiated care in addition to
implementation of universal treatment, decentralized HIV care for children is achievable. Interventions to improve adherence
in this age-group are urgently needed.
Copyright: © 2017 McHugh G et al; licensee International AIDS Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
Participants
Methods
Study setting
counselling were enrolled into the cohort study (of Until February 2014, participants were ART eligible if
whom a proportion were simultaneously enrolled into 3
CD4 was below 350 cells/mm or they had evidence of
a rando-mized controlled trial to assess impact of WHO Stage 3 or 4 infections. ART regimens consisted of
household sup-port to children living with HIV[trial stavu-dine/lamivudine and nevirapine for children under 12
registry number PACTR201212000442288]), if they years or tenofovir/lamivudine and nevirapine if over 12
chose to access HIV care at the clinic where they years of age. Efavirenz was substituted for nevirapine in
were diagnosed and gave consent [23]. case of concomitant TB treatment or nevirapine allergy.
From March 2014, Zimbabwe adopted the WHO 2013
consoli-dated guidelines with the threshold for ART
3
Study procedures initiation revised to 500 cells/mm and ART regimes were
standar-dized to zidovudine/lamivudine and nevirapine for
those under 12 years and not requiring TB treatment, and
At the initial assessment visit within a week of HIV diag- teno-fovir/lamivudine and efavirenz for those over 12 years
nosis, socio-demographic data, past clinical history and of age [26]. CD4 count was performed 6 monthly for all
current symptoms were assessed, and a standardized participants. HIV viral load testing was performed at 48
examination performed. Participants underwent WHO weeks post ART commencement using COBAS
Staging and a CD4 count, using Alere Pima™ CD4 Ampliprep/Taqman 48 Version 2.0.
machine, was measured [24]. All participants underwent
counselling and were started on cotrimoxazole.
Unscheduled visits were defined as visits occurring out-side
Participants who screened positive on the WHO TB
the scheduled visits for either a medical or non-med-ical
screen had sputum examined onsite by Ziehl–Neelsen
reason (e.g. counselling). Side effects were graded according
smear microscopy and Xpert TB™ [25]. Participants were
to the DAIDS grading system [27].Hospitalization was defined
seen within 2 weeks of the initial visit to assess
as a participant spending one night or more in a hospital. If a
adherence and determine side effects of cotrimoxazole,
participant had more than one hospitaliza-tion, they were
and to commence ART if eligible. The schedule for follow
counted separately even if related to the same clinical issue.
up was based on national guide-lines, with visits at 2 and
Transfer out was defined as a caregiver informing the clinic of
6 weeks post ART commencement and then on a 3-
the participant changing care to another clinic and a transfer
monthly basis. Participants not eligible for ART at
letter being provided. Participants who failed to attend more
baseline underwent a 3-monthly symptom-based review
than two scheduled
and examination to reassess ART eligibility. At each visit,
a standard proforma was used to collect information on
current symptoms, side effects of ART, history of contact
2
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
Ethical considerations
Results
(IQR)
Characteristic N
start ART were significantly more likely to be LTFU than
those who started ART (p < 0.001). CD4 counts for those
Age (years), median (IQR) 11 (9,10,11,12,13) who commenced ART increased over the follow-up period,
Female 199 (52%) with those who did not start ART (n = 89) maintaining their
CD4 counts (Figure 1). Of those who commenced ART
3 within 24 weeks of enrolment into the study (n = 273), 200
Median (IQR), CD4 cells/mm 375 (215–599)
had a viral load sample collected between 40 and 72
3
CD4< 350 cells/mm 177 (46%) weeks post ART, with 195 results obtained. 124 (64%) of
those whose viral load result was obtained had a viral load
3
CD4 350–500 cells/mm 74 (19%) <400 copies/ml.
3
CD4> 500 cells/mm 131 (34%)
Mother-to-child 369 (96%) There were 146 unscheduled visits made by 99 participants
over the follow-up period, equivalent to a rate of 34.94/100
Horizontal 13 (3%) person years (95% CI 29.70–41.09). Ten unscheduled visits
Unknown 3 (1%) resulted in hospitalization, all of whom were receiving ART.
The most common reason for an unscheduled attendance to
Orphanhood 157 (41%) the clinic was illness (n = 133, 91%). Other reasons included
medication collection (n = 5, 3%) and additional adherence
Both parents alive 77 (20%)
counselling (n = 8, 6%). The major cause of illness leading to
Maternal Orphan/Father Alive 71 (18%) an unscheduled visit was respiratory tract infection
(responsible for 45% of unscheduled visits due to illness),
Paternal Orphan/Mother Alive 58 (15%) followed by skin infections which accounted for 22% of
Double Orphan 22 (6%) unscheduled visits due to illness (Table 3).
3
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
Total Initiated ART over follow Did not initiate ART over P-
In care to end of study follow up 286 (74.3%) 243 (82.1%) 43 (48.3%) <0.01
a
ascertained through phone calls and home visits.
800
700
600
)
3
/MM
500
(CELLS
400
COUNT
300
CD4
200
100
0
BASELINE 24 WKS 48 WKS 72 WKS
TIME FROM ENROLMENT
Hospitalizations
Deaths
There were 34 hospitalizations in 27 participants, 9 of which
resulted in death. The rate of the hospitalization was 8.14/100
person years (95% CI 5.81–11.39). Lower respiratory tract The mortality rate was 2.86/100 pyrs (95% CI 1.65–4.95). Of
disease was commonest reason for admis-sion (Table 4). TB the 13 deaths in the cohort, 12 occurred in hospital and
was the cause of hospitalization in 8 respiratory disease was the most common cause (Table 5).
4
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
Pulmonary TB 11
2.1) and wasting (HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3–2.7)) were associated
Otitis Media 2
with having unscheduled visits due to illness. On multi-
Tonsillitis 4 variate analysis, association with being in an older age
group (aHR 1.9 (95%CI 1.3–3.1)) and wasting (aHR 1.8
Skin infections 29 (22%) (95%C.I 1.0–2.3)) remained significant.
Oro-labial Herpes Simplex 5
Herpes Zoster 5
Chicken Pox 1
Gastroenteritis 9
Chronic diarrhoea 2
Hepatitis A 1
Oral candidiasis 3
Oesophageal candidiasis 1
Anaemia 1
Miscellaneous 8 (6%)
Minor trauma 1
Gingivitis 2
Conjunctivitis 2
Mumps 1
TB lymphadenitis 2
Lower respiratory tract infection 4 (31)
Anaemia/Thrombocytopenia 1 (7)
Cause of hospitalization N (%)
Pulmonary TB 7
Discussion
Disseminated TB 1
Our study demonstrated that nurse-led HIV care for children
Lower respiratory tract infection 9
and adolescents is possible in primary care settings. The rate
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia 1 of retention in care was comparable to that reported in facility-
based settings and higher than a recent retrospective cohort
Neurological Illness n= 5 (15%) review of children attending decentralized care in Swaziland
[20,29]. Provision of HIV care in primary care facilities reduces
Bacterial meningitis 1 the distance that patients need to travel to access treatment,
and this may help improve retention in care [3,20]. Notably,
Cryptococcal meningitis 2
the rate of retention in care was sig-nificantly lower in those
who did not start ART, with half of those who did not initiate
CNS lymphoma 1
ART being LTFU. This finding has been reported previously
Seizure (cause unknown) 1 and may be because patients per-ceive no benefit in attending
for care if they are not
Miscellaneous n = 11 (32%)
Hyperglycaemia 1
a
Anaemia 3
Gastroenteritis 1
b
Malaria 2
cotrimoxazole
Pulmonary TB 4 (31)
5
Table 6. Cox proportional hazard ratio for hospitalization, unscheduled visit due to illness and death
N = 34 N = 118
a
Total N Rate (95% CI) ratio AHR N Rate (95% CI) ratio
Age 11–15 200 17 7.7 (4.8–12.5) 0.9 (0.5–1.8) - 82 37.3 (30.1–46.4) 2.1 (1.4–3.1)
Sex Female 199 15 6.9 (4.2–11.5) 0.7 (0.4–1.4) - 68 31.4 (24.7–39.8) 1.3 (0.9–1.8)
CD4 at <350 177 26 13.1 (8.9–19.3) 4.1 (1.8–9.4) 3.6 (1.6–8.3) 65 32.8 (25.7–41.8) 1.4 (0.9–1.9)
b
enrolment >350 205 7 3.2 (1.5–6.8) 1 53 24.5 (18.7–32.0) 1
WHO stage 3–4 155 25 14.8 (10.0–21.9) 4.0 (1.9–8.6) 2.6 (1.1–6.2) 59 34.9 (27.1–45.1) 1.5 (1.0–2.1)
ART within Y 206 22 9.2 (6.1–14.0) 1.4 (0.7–2.9) - 69 28.9 (22.8–36.5) 1.1 (0.75–1.6)
Wasting Y 105 19 17.3 (11.1–27.2) 3.5 (1.8–6.8) 2.1 (1.0–4.5) 47 42.9 (32.2–57.1) 1.8 (1.3–2.7)
a
Adjusted for factors significantly associated with the outcome in univariate analysis; AHR: adjusted hazard
b
ratio; data missing for n = 3
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
7
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
1
Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe;
2 5. Vermund SH, Blevins M, Moon TD, José E, Moiane L, Tique
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene
3 JA, et al. Poor clinical outcomes for HIV infected children on antiretroviral
and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Directorate of Health Services, Harare
4 therapy in rural Mozambique: need for program quality improvement and
City Health, Harare, Zimbabwe; Department of Paediatrics, University of community engagement. Dowdy DW, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. Public
5
Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe; National and Supranational Reference Library of Science;2014 Jan [cited 2014 Oct 23];9(10):e110116.
Laboratory, Research Centre Borstel, Germany
doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0110116
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors have
no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
Funding
References
1 Arrivé E, Dicko F, Amghar H, Aka AE, Dior H, Bouah B, et al. HIV status
disclosure and retention in care in HIV-infected adolescents on antiretroviral
care nurses in South Africa (STRETCH): a pragmatic, parallel, cluster-rando- therapy (ART) in West Africa. PLoS One [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2014 Jun
mised trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2012 Sep 8 [cited 2014 Oct 27];380(9845):889– 12];7(3):e33690. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articler
ender.fcgi?artid=3310064&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
98. Available from: 1 Kidia KK, Mupambireyi Z, Cluver L, Ndhlovu CE, Borok M, Ferrand RA.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?
HIV status disclosure to perinatally-infected adolescents in Zimbabwe: a
artid=3442223&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
qualita-tive study of adolescent and healthcare worker perspectives. PLoS
One [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2015 Jun 23];9(1):e87322. Available from:
1 Bemelmans M, van den Akker T, Ford N, Philips M, Zachariah R, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3903632&tool=
Harries A, et al. Providing universal access to antiretroviral therapy in pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
Thyolo, Malawi through task shifting and decentralization of HIV/AIDS
care. Trop Med Int Health [Internet]. 2010 Dec [cited 2014 Oct
21];15(12):1413–20. Available from:
1 Menson EN, Walker AS, Sharland M, Wells C, Tudor-Williams G, Riordan FAI,
(4):414–22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583614 1 Salou M, Dagnra AY, Butel C, Vidal N, Serrano L, Takassi E, et al.
High rates of virological failure and drug resistance in perinatally HIV-1-
infected children and adolescents receiving lifelong antiretroviral
therapy in routine clinics in Togo. J Int AIDS Soc [Internet]. The
1 Grimsrud A, Bygrave H, Doherty M, Ehrenkranz P, Ellman T, International AIDS Society;2016 [cited 2016 Jul 27];19(1):20683.
Ferris R, et al. Reimagining HIV service delivery: the role of Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/27125320
differentiated care from prevention to suppression. J Int AIDS Soc
[Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Jul 6];19 (1):21484. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 27914186 1 Abuogi LL, Smith C, McFarland EJ. Retention of HIV-infected
children in the first 12 months of anti-retroviral therapy and predictors
of attrition in resource limited settings: a systematic review. PLoS One
1 Ministry of Health and Child Care Z. Operational and service delivery [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 25];11(6):e0156506. Available from:
manual for the prevention, care and treatment of HIV in Zimbabwe http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/27280404
[Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.differentiated
care.org/Portals/0/adam/Content/JAOEkYYIREyKQ6R637vBmA/File/
Zimbabwe_OSDM_webrevised_2017.pdf 1 Agwu AL, Fairlie L. Antiretroviral treatment, management challenges and
outcomes in perinatally HIV-infected adolescents. J Int AIDS Soc [Internet].
2013 Jan [cited 2014 May 19];16:18579. Available from: http://www.pub
1 Kredo T, Ford N, Adeniyi FB, Garner P. Decentralising HIV medcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3687074&tool=pmcentrez&ren
treatment in lower- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database dertype=abstract
Syst Rev [Internet]. 2013 Jun 27 [cited 2016 Nov 18];(6):CD009987.
Available from: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807693
1 Auld AF, Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha H, Azih C, Kamiru H, Baughman
AL, Agolory S, et al. Decentralizing access to antiretroviral therapy for
1 Kredo T, Adeniyi FB, Bateganya M, Pienaar ED. Task shifting from children living with HIV in Swaziland. Pediatr Infect Dis J [Internet].
doctors to non-doctors for initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral 2016 Aug [cited 2017 Jul 6];35(8):886–93. Available from:
therapy. In: Kredo T, editor. Cochrane database of systematic reviews http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/26849157
8
McHugh G et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20:21843
http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21843 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21843
† Integrated management of childhood illness for high HIV settings KKMakadzange AT, Higgins-Biddle M, Chimukangara B, Birri R,
[Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008 [cited 2015 Sep 24]. Gordon M, Mahlanza T. et al. Clinical, Virologic, Immunologic
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23805440 outcomes and emerging HIV Drug resistance patterns in children and
adolescents in public ART Care in Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2015;10:12.
† PACTR registry [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jun 8]. Available from: http://www.
pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo= LL Ferrand RA, Briggs D, Ferguson J, Penazzato M, Armstrong A,
PACTR201212000442288 MacPherson P, et al. Viral suppression in adolescents on antiretroviral
treatment: review of the literature and critical appraisal of
methodological challenges. Trop Med Int Health [Internet]. Wiley-
† Interim WHO clinical staging of HIV/AIDS and HIV/AIDS case definitions for
Blackwell; 2016 Mar [cited 2016 Jul 25];21(3):325–33. Available from:
surveillance [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005 [cited 2015 Jun
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/26681359
12]. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/clinicalstaging.pdf
Page 931
LAMPIRAN