11 tayangan

Diunggah oleh MoloyBanerjee

- 2006, A Constrained Particle Dynamics for Continuum-particle Hybrid Method in Micro- And Nano-fluidics, 2006
- Pressure Drop Evaluation Along Pipelines
- 22418_21080115120037_Aulia Riswalida_Tugas 4
- 007_Seetharaman
- Numerical Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations for the Entranc
- Wsf-4 2624 Manuscript
- Food Technology
- Waste Lube Synopsis
- Fluid Mech Module
- Determination of the Arrhenius Parameters of Mahogany Seed Oil Using Viscosity Flow Data
- Microsoft Power Point - Fluids -Senatorlibya [Compatibility Mode]
- Fluid
- LessonPlanDiffusion_122115sm
- Andritos & Hanratty
- ME 305 Part 1 Fundamental Fluid and Flow Properties
- zhang et al.pdf
- Hose Surge Report
- 305.3.pptx
- WL22SDL_400-P-160121-E-01
- 2445803 Fluent Tutorial 01

Anda di halaman 1dari 17

, 72 (1997) 55 – 71

Herschel–Bulkley fluids

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis *

Department of Chemical Engineering, Uni6ersity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada

Received 1 November 1996; received in revised form 7 March 1997

Abstract

Previous numerical simulations for the flow of Bingham plastics past a sphere contained in cylindrical tubes of

different diameter ratios are extended to Herschel – Bulkley fluids with the purpose of comparing them with

experiments. The emphasis is on determining the extent and shape of yielded/unyielded regions along with the drag

coefficient as a function of the pertinent dimensionless groups. Good overall agreement is obtained between the

numerical results and the experimental studies. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.

1. Introduction

A recent study [1] on Bingham plastics in flows around a sphere falling in tubes of different

diameter ratios showed the extent and shape of yielded/unyielded regions and the calculation of

the Stokes drag coefficient as a function of the Bingham number. The constitutive equation used

was the continuous viscoplastic equation proposed by Papanastasiou [2], which reduces the

difficulty of solving for the location of the unyielded surface, and which holds for all

deformation rates. The numerical simulations showed that all previous postulates [3,4] and

numerical solutions [5] about the shape of the yielded/unyielded regions are correct under the

right physical conditions, i.e., a combination of geometry and Bingham number.

The experimental work by Atapattu et al. [6,7] deals extensively with creeping sphere motion

in Herschel – Bulkley fluids and provides new information on wall effects, drag behaviour and

the size of the yielded/unyielded regions. Here, the drag coefficient is also represented as a

function of a dynamic parameter, which includes the Bingham and Reynolds numbers. The

PII S 0 3 7 7 - 0 2 5 7 ( 9 7 ) 0 0 0 2 4 - 4

56 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

yielded/unyielded regions for different diameter ratios postulated by Atapattu et al. [6] are

shown in Fig. 1.

It is the purpose of the present work to reexamine through numerical simulation these flows

and to compare the present numerical results with the experimental studies of Atapattu et al. [6].

The numerical simulations are extended over a wide range of Bingham and Reynolds numbers,

similarly focusing on wall effects, drag behaviour, and the extent and shape of the yielded/un-

yielded regions.

2. Mathematical modeling

The problem at hand, i.e. a sphere of radius R falling with a terminal velocity V in a tube of

radius Rc filled with a viscoplastic fluid, has been described in [1] and shown here in Fig. 2. The

flow phenomena postulated by previous workers for viscoplastic flows around spheres include

polar caps appearing on the top and bottom of the sphere due to the stagnation points in the

flow as predicted by Beris et al. [5]. Solid regions, or islands, similar to those proposed by Ansley

and Smith [3], may also appear on both sides of the sphere as will be shown by the present

numerical simulations.

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the shape of the yielded/unyielded regions surrounding a sphere in creeping

motion through a Herschel–Bulkley fluid as given by Atapattu et al. [6]: (a) RC/R = 3.021, Bn*= 2.526; (b)

RC/R5 7.604, Bn*=2.526; (c) RC/R=9.635, Bn*=3.140.

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 57

Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the system of a sphere falling in a tube filled with a viscoplastic medium. The

shaded regions are unyielded and so are the small black regions forming polar caps around the stagnation points on

the sphere and the two islands on each side of the sphere.

The flow is governed by the usual conservation equations of mass and momentum for an

incompressible fluid under isothermal conditions. The constitutive equation that relates the

stress to the deformation is the Herschel–Bulkley equation. In simple shear flow, the Herschel–

Bulkley equation takes the form (see Fig. 3)

t =ty + Kg; n for t \ ty (1a)

g; = 0 for t5 ty (1b)

where t is the shear stress, g; is the shear rate, ty is the yield stress, K is the consistency index

and n is the power-law index. Note that when the shear stress t falls below ty, a solid structure

is formed (unyielded). Also when the power-law index is unity and the consistency index is

equivalent to the plastic viscosity, the Herschel–Bulkley model reduces to the Bingham model.

Applying Papanastasiou’s [2] modification to the Herschel–Bulkley model gives

58 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

where m is the stress growth exponent with units of time (s). Fig. 3 shows that for values of

m \ 1000 s, this modified equation mimics the ideal Herschel–Bulkley model. In addition, Eq.

(2) approximates well the ideal Herschel-Bulkley fluid in the limiting cases of g; and of g; 0

when the apparent viscosity h= t/g; Kg; n − 1 when h Kg; n − 1 +mty. The exponential modifica-

tion was previously applied to Herschel–Bulkley fluids and used by Mitsoulis et al. [8] to study

the non-isothermal flow through extrusion dies and to determine the shape and extent of

yielded/unyielded regions, extrudate swell, and the development of the temperature field. The

full tensorial form of Eq. (2) is given in [8] and follows readily from the Bingham modification

(see [1]).

3. Dimensionless parameters

The relative importance of inertia forces is assessed by the generalized Reynolds number Re*,

defined for power-law fluids as [9]

V 2 − nd nr

Re*= (3)

K

where d is the diameter of the sphere, r is the density of the fluid, and V is the terminal velocity

of the sphere. For the numerical simulations performed in the present work, Re* 1 for most

cases, and the creeping flow approximation is valid.

For materials with a yield stress obeying the Herschel–Bulkley model, a generalized Bingham

number Bn* is defined as

Fig. 3. Shear stress vs. shear rate according to the modified Herschel – Bulkley constitutive Eqs. (1a) and (1b) for

several values of the stress growth exponent m for fluid S-10 (a Carbopol solution with K = 23.89 Pa×sn, ty = 46.47

Pa, n= 0.5).

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 59

ty

Bn* = , (4)

K(V/d)n

where an apparent shear rate can be defined as g; =V/d.

A corresponding equation for the Stokes drag coefficient can be written for Herschel–Bulkley

fluids following equivalent definitions for Re* for power-law fluids [9]:

F

C*s = . (5)

6pKV nR 2 − n21 − nX(n)

Here, F is the external force acting on the sphere due to gravity, and X(n) is the drag correction

factor which is a function of the power-law index, n. In the present work, the values for X(n)

were taken from experimental measurements done by Gu and Tanner [9]. Ansley and Smith [3]

also incorporate a general definition of the drag coefficient which does not neglect inertial effects

and is given as

4 (rS − r) gd 24C*SX(n)

CD = = (6)

3 rV 2 Re

where rS is the sphere density and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

A dimensionless yield stress is then defined in terms of the modified Bingham number and

drag coefficient as

Bn*

t*y = (7)

6C*S X(n)

Chhabra and Uhlherr [10] also define the gravity-yield number given by

ty Bn* t*y

YG = = = (8)

2gR(rs − r) 18C*S X(n) 3

In all cases, the Newtonian fluid corresponds to Bn*=0, t *=0,

y and YG =0.

Ansley and Smith [3] reduced the number of dimensionless groups for Bingham plastics by

defining a dynamic parameter, Q, which is a function of the Reynolds and Bingham numbers.

The equivalent generalized dynamic parameter Q* for Herschel–Bulkley fluids is given by

Atapattu et al. [6] as

Re*

Q = (9)

1 + kBn*

where k is postulated to be equal to 7p/24 (=0.9163) for Bingham plastics. Ansley and Smith

[3] showed that the drag coefficient from Eq. (6) was a function of the dynamic parameter.

4. Method of solution

together with the conservation equations of mass and momentum, and appropriate boundary

conditions by the Finite Element Method (FEM) as explained in the previous papers [1,8]. All

lengths are scaled with R, all velocities with V, and all pressures and stresses with KV n/R n.

60 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

Table 1

Properties of the S-10, S-11 and S-12 test fluids (Carbopol solutions) used in the experimental studies by Atapattu

et al. [6] and in the numerical simulations

S-11 43.15 38.15 0.59 1000 1.39

S-12 9.14 5.32 0.48 1000 1.43

Simulations are carried out for a wide range of Bingham numbers (0 5Bn*B) by

decreasing the value of the velocity V, while the radius R, consistency index K, the yield stress

ty, and the power-law index n are held constant, representing the material properties of each

viscoplastic fluid. Three of the twelve fluids considered by Atapattu et al. [6] are simulated in this

study, namely the fluids designated as S-10, S-11, and S-12 (aqueous solutions of different grades

of Carbopol 940 and 941 resins supplied by Goodrich, USA). The values of the parameters in

the Herschel – Bulkley model for these fluids are given in Table 1, together with the drag

correction factor X(n) determined by Gu and Tanner [9] for power-law fluids.

It was found during the numerical simulations that the results were very dependent on the

values of the stress growth exponent, m, at large Bingham numbers, but were less affected for

very high values of m. The values of the stress growth exponent m used in this study vary for

each fluid and Bingham number so as to maintain the ratio of viscosities at low and high shear

rates sufficiently large. The method for calculating the correct value of m to use for a

corresponding Bingham number is by implementing the criterion that the ratio of viscosities at

g; 0 and g; , given by the expression mg; (Bn*), be equal to 1000. By maintaining the value

of m sufficiently large (103 B mB 106), the results become independent of m, and better results

for the drag coefficient and the extent of the yielded/unyielded regions are achieved. The

criterion of keeping the ratio of viscosities large is equivalent to that used by Tsamopoulos et al.

[11] and similar to that used by O’Donovan and Tanner [12], and Beverly and Tanner [13] in

their biviscosity model for viscoplastic materials.

The values of the diameter ratios, RC/R, used in the simulations are those ratios used in the

experimental work undertaken by Atapattu et al. [6] (i.e., RC/R=3.021, 4.531, 5.469, 7.604 and

9.635). The flow length L/R ratio was taken to be about the same as the RC/R ratio for all cases,

except for the 3.021:1 and 4.531:1 ratios, where L/R was set equal to 6. The corresponding L/R

values for the other cases are 6,8 and 10 for the 5.469:1, 7.604:1 and 9.635:1 diameter ratios,

respectively. The finite element meshes are similar in grid density to the ones used in the

previous work by Blackery and Mitsoulis [1], ranging from 470–637 quadrilateral Lagrangian

elements, 2000 –2700 nodes, and 4200–5800 degrees of freedom for the velocities–pressures.

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 61

We first applied our numerical scheme to the calculation of the creeping flow of a Newtonian

fluid past a sphere to evaluate the meshes constructed for the given diameter ratios. Bohlin’s

approximation [1] was used to compare the values of the drag coefficient for a Newtonian fluid,

and the results for the different RC/R ratios are given in Table 2. The differences between the

calculated values and those predicted by Bohlin’s approximation are always below 0.2%.

Numerical results on the extent and shape of the yielded/unyielded (shaded) regions with the

Herschel – Bulkley model have been produced for all three fluids and five diameter ratios (9.635,

7.604:1, 5.469:1, 4.531:1, 3.021:1). In the interest of brevity, we present here only the results for

fluid S-10 and for the lowest and highest diameter ratios, in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. All of

the figures show the progressive growth of the unyielded region as Bn* and t *y increase, up to

the point where the region becomes completely plastic. It can also be seen that as Bn* increases,

the solid regions on each side of the sphere (islands) increase in size as do the solid regions

located around the front and rear stagnation points (polar caps).

For the 3.021:1 case (Fig. 4), the fluid region extends to the wall of the tube for low Bingham

numbers. The similarity of the results for Bn*=0.108 with the schematic representation of Fig.

1(a) is remarkable. Solid regions around the front and rear stagnation points (caps) as well as

on each side of the sphere (islands) first appear in these figures around Bn*=27.36. At an

intermediate Bingham number (i.e., Bn*=197.5), the fluid zone disappears near the wall and

develops around the sphere. As the Bingham number continues to increase, the fluid zone

diminishes, while the solid island regions on each side of the sphere grow and at Bn*=368.4

they have already reached the outer plastic boundary. The diminishing of the fluid region

continues as the Bingham number increases, and the solid polar caps grow and reach the plastic

boundary around Bn* = 1360. Also note the isolated fluid regions at the front and the rear of

the sphere for Bn*= 1360. For the higher Bingham numbers (i.e., Bn*=1768) all that remains

are crescent-shaped fluid regions on each side of the sphere until they too disappear, and a

completely plastic medium is present around the sphere.

Table 2

Comparison of drag coefficient results with Bohlin’s approximation [1] for Newtonian fluids

7.604 1.3758 1.3737 0.15

5.469 1.5955 1.5930 0.16

4.531 1.7937 1.7942 0.03

3.021 2.6718 2.6733 0.05

62 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

Fig. 4. Progressive growth of the unyielded zone (shaded) for the flow of Herschel – Bulkley fluid S-10 (see Table 1)

around a sphere contained in a tube with a 3.021:1 diameter ratio.

For the 9.635:1 case (Fig. 5, note the change of window size (4×4) in the right-hand side

column showing more details for the higher Bn* values), the fluid region does not extend to the

wall of the tube for any Bingham number shown. The similarity of the results for Bn* =3.140

with the schematic representation of Fig. 1(c) is remarkable. The solid polar caps and solid

islands first appear around Bn*= 59.59. The solid islands on each side of the sphere grow and

meet the outer plastic regions around Bn*=723.1. The solid polar caps grow as the Bingham

number increases and join with the plastic region around Bn*= 2990. Crescent-shaped fluid

regions form for Bn*= 3128, and as the Bingham number increases, the medium around the

sphere is completely plastic.

The results for the intermediate diameter ratios follow similar patterns as described above and

are not repeated here. The same is true for the other two fluids S-11 and S-12.

A comparison between the present simulation results and the experimental results by Atapattu

et al. [6] for the shape and extent of the yielded/unyielded regions is now in order. In their effort

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 63

to provide comparisons with simulations for a Bingham plastic falling in an infinite medium,

Atapattu et al. [6] have used not a generalized Bn*, but a Bingham number (their Bi ) based on

an equivalent plastic viscosity m evaluated at an apparent shear rate of V/d. With the proper

modifications to correspond to Bn*, Fig. 6 shows a comparison between our numerical results

and the experiments by Atapattu et al. [6] for the corresponding fluids (fluid S-11 for the highest

Fig. 5. Progressive growth of the unyielded zone (shaded) for the flow of Herschel – Bulkley fluid S-10 (see Table 1)

around a sphere contained in a tube with a 9.635:1 diameter ratio.

64 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

Fig. 6.

diameter ratio of 9.635 and fluid S-10 for the other ratios). As can be seen, the results in the

outer yield surface agree well for the higher diameter ratios, especially along the axial symmetry

line (z/R). However, the agreement of results for RC/R=3.021 is poor. It is interesting to note

that the yielded/unyielded region for RC/R =3.021 postulated by Atapattu et al. [6] at a

Bingham number of 2.526 is very similar to that of the present results at a Bingham number of

0.108 (see Fig. 4). The disagreement between results is rather puzzling for the lowest RC/R ratio.

To that effect, the present results for Bn* =0.108 are shown vs. the result by Atapattu et al. [6]

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 65

for Bn* =2.526, where the agreement is good. This suggests that perhaps a clerical error in the

literature may be attributed to the discrepancy of results for this particular geometry.

The use of a continuous viscoplastic model, such as the one used here, to determine the exact

shape of yielded/unyielded regions can be criticized, since the model predicts deformation (albeit

extremely small) for all values of the exponent m. A careful examination of the velocities and

velocity gradients in disputed regions, such as the islands and the polar caps, showed that there

the velocity gradients are extremely small (but not identically zero), and these regions are really

apparently unyielded regions (AUR), as opposed to truly yielded regions that do exist whenever

a plug velocity profile occurs. However, in the present simulations we do not differentiate

between the two, and the separating line has been drawn as the contour of the magnitude of the

extra stress tensor having a value equal to the yield stress, as in our previous publications [1,8].

Fig. 6. Comparison of the present results (left) with the results by Atapattu et al. [6] (right), regarding the extent and

shape of the yielded/unyielded regions for flow of a Herschel – Bulkley fluid around a sphere. All results are for fluid

S-10 except the first (RC/R=9.635), which is for fluid S-11.

66 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

Fig. 7. Comparison of the present results (solid lines) with the results by Atapattu et al. [6] (symbols), regarding the

axial velocities, 6z, along the equatorial line for different diameter ratios (i.e., RC/R = 3.021, 4.531, 5.469 and 7.604).

All results are for fluid S-10 and correspond to the conditions of Fig. 6.

The results for the dimensionless axial velocities, 6z /V, along the equatorial line for different

diameter ratios are shown in Fig. 7 for fluid S-10 and for the same conditions given in Fig. 6.

Included in this figure are the experimental results of the velocity profiles by Atapattu et al. [6]

for the same fluid. The present results, represented by the solid lines, agree well with those by

Atapattu et al. [6] for the larger diameter ratios. However, the agreement of results for the

3.021:1 diameter ratio is poor regarding the location of the maximum velocity (i.e., r/RC =1.7

and r/RC = 2.1 for the present results and the Atapattu et al. [6] results, respectively). Note that

the same was true for the yielded/unyielded regions for this case as discussed above (see Fig. 6).

For each diameter ratio, the rise in the dimensionless axial velocities with radial distance

precedes those of Atapattu et al. [6], however, the maxima of the dimensionless axial velocities

agree well with the experimental results. Points to notice are the changing slope of the velocity

profile before and after the maxima, suggesting the absence of islands for these conditions,

which was also borne out by the numerical simulations. However, the leveling-off of the velocity

profile after some distance suggests no velocity changes (plug profile) corresponding to practi-

cally unyielded regions, which was also found in the numerical simulations (see Fig. 6).

The dependence of the drag coefficient (Eq. (6)) with respect to the generalized dynamic

parameter is shown in Fig. 8, where the solid line represents the expression CD =24X(n)/Q*.

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 67

Also included in this figure are the experimental results by Atapattu et al. [6] shown as hollow

circular symbols, and the present results shown as solid square symbols. The present results

incorporate the values of X(n) given experimentally by Gu and Tanner [9] (see Eq. (16)),

whereas the results for the drag coefficient extend over 15 orders of magnitude in the dynamic

parameter (10 − 16 5 Q*5 0.89), which is roughly twice the range of the results from Atapattu et

al. [6], which extend over seven orders of magnitude (10 − 8 5Q*50.3).

A non-linear regression analysis was performed on the data with respect to the drag

coefficient as a function of the dynamic parameter in the form of

(1+ kBn*)

CD = 24X(n) . (10)

Re*

This form is used to evaluate the value of k, for which Ansley and Smith [3] postulated a value

of 7p/24 ( =0.9163). The physical significance of k relates to the ratio of the drag term involving

yield stresses to the drag term involving viscous stresses [3]. The values of k found for each

diameter ratio for the S-10 Herschel–Bulkley fluid are given in Table 3 in the following ranges

of conditions: 1.43 × 10 − 12 5 Re*5 0.00175; 0.7475Bn*5952.4. It can be seen from Table 3

that the values of k for each diameter ratio are close to the one postulated by Ansley and Smith

[3].

The numerical values of the Stokes drag coefficient (Eq. (5)) with corresponding values of the

generalized Bingham and Reynolds numbers are shown in Table 4 for the case of 3.021:1

Fig. 8. Drag coefficient (defined by Eq. (6)) vs. the dynamic parameter for Herschel – Bulkley fluids flowing around

a sphere contained in a tube for different diameter ratios. The solid line represents CD = 24X(n)/Q* (symbols:

,

present results; , results by Atapattu [6]).

68 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

Table 3

Values of k in the expression of the dynamic parameter defined by Eq. (9) obtained from the regression analysis for

the S-10 Herschel–Bulkley fluid Eq. (10)

3.021 0.892

4.531 0.884

5.469 0.857

7.604 0.821

9.635 0.877

diameter ratio and the S-10 Herschel–Bulkley fluid. It is to be noted that Bn* and C *S are of the

same order of magnitude, while Re* decreases very rapidly from the value of about 1 for the

lowest Bn* to many orders of magnitude, thus justifying the creeping flow approximation.

The dependence of the Stokes drag coefficient (Eq. (7)) on the dimensionless yield stress (t *)y

is shown in Fig. 9 for different diameter ratios for the S-10 fluid simulations. Similar results are

obtained for the other two fluids. It is noted that at low yield stress values, the curve for the

3.021:1 diameter ratio is higher than the other curves, owing to the fact that the drag coefficient

for this geometry even for the Newtonian case is much higher than that of the other diameter

ratios. The results of Beris et al. [5] for the infinite case showed that the curve asymptotically

approaches a line of constant dimensionless yield stress value equal to 0.143, where the sphere

Table 4

Values of the Stokes drag coefficient (C *),

S generalized Bingham number (Bn*), and generalized Reynolds number

(Re*) for the 3.021:1 diameter ratio for the S-10 Herschel – Bulkley fluid

Bn* Re* C *S

0.747 2.956×10−3 2.101

2.299 1.014×10−4 3.600

3.140 3.980×10−5 4.383

5.530 7.287×10−6 7.547

8.047 2.365×10−6 8.783

14.91 3.718×10−7 14.77

27.36 6.017×10−8 25.40

59.59 5.824×10−9 52.52

197.5 1.600×10−10 167.0

340.7 3.116×10−11 282.6

544.6 7.629×10−12 434.4

748.5 2.939×10−12 568.7

952.4 1.426×10−12 690.2

1156 7.971×10−13 801.2

1360 4.897×10−13 904.2

1564 3.220×10−13 1001

1768 2.230×10−13 1091

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 69

Fig. 9. Stokes drag coefficient vs. dimensionless yield stress t *y for the S-10 Herschel – Bulkley fluid flowing around a

sphere contained in a tube for different diameter ratios.

becomes motionless. Atapattu et al. [6] also discovered a critical dimensionless yield stress value

where the sphere becomes motionless at t *:0.183.y In reality, the latter number is an

experimental estimate of ‘no motion’, i.e. motion too slow to observe in a reasonable time of a

few minutes or hours.

It can be argued that the present results up to t *=0.14

y conform with the previous numerical

results by Beris et al. [5] and Blackery and Mitsoulis [1], where the curves appear to be

asymptotic about t *=y 0.143. However, once the curves reach the asymptote line, they bend

dramatically in favour of the yield stress, and they tend to level off towards the value proposed

by Atapattu et al. [6], near 0.183. This corresponds to a tendency towards total encapsulation

of the sphere by the unyielded region and cessation of motion. It appears that the sudden bend

in the curves is due to the two-viscosity model inherent even in the Papanastasiou modification

as the Bn* becomes very large. The regime t *B0.143

y represents ‘flow’ governed by the lower

viscosity, while the regime t *\

y 0.143 represents ‘creep’ governed by the higher viscosity. This

creep should continue indefinitely, and an accurate value of the critical dimensionless yield stress

where the sphere becomes absolutely motionless is difficult to determine, since there is no

criterion for the motion of the sphere based on the shape of the yielded/unyielded regions.

The present results differ from those by Beris et al. [5] and Blackery and Mitsoulis [1], since

there is a difference in how the simulations were carried out. In the previous simulations, the

Bingham number was increased by increasing the yield stress value but maintaining the velocity

constant. In the present simulations, the yield stress of the test fluid was used, and the Bingham

number was increased by decreasing the velocity. This also gives an insight into why Beris et al.

[5] and Blackery and Mitsoulis [1] were not able to attain the limit of cessation of sphere motion,

since the boundary condition of having a constant velocity did not allow the sphere to become

70 M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71

motionless, within the context of the simulations. Physically, Beris et al. [5] and Blackery and

Mitsoulis [1] have solved for pulling a sphere through viscoplastic materials, whereas in the

present work, the sphere speed is reduced so that at the limit, it ceases to move, and it is totally

surrounded by unyielded material. This may be closer to the experimental situation encountered

with real fluids, such as the Carbopol solutions, where the existence of a true yield stress below

which there is absolutely no deformation, may be disputed.

6. Conclusions

Finite element simulations have been undertaken for creeping flows of Herschel–Bulkley

fluids past a sphere falling in cylindrical tubes. The ideal Herschel–Bulkley equation has been

modified as proposed by Papanastasiou [2] with an exponential growth term to make it valid in

both yielded and unyielded regions, thus eliminating the need for tracking the location of the

yield surfaces. The present results conform with the previous study by Atapattu et al. [6]

regarding the dependence of the drag coefficient on the dynamic parameter proposed by Ansley

and Smith [3]. The extent and shape of the yielded/unyielded regions has been determined using

the criterion of the magnitude of the extra stress tensor exceeding the yield stress.

New results include the determination of the drag coefficient, extending over a 15 orders-of-

magnitude variation in the dynamic parameter and a four orders-of-magnitude variation in the

Bingham number. The Stokes drag coefficient was also determined as a function of a dimension-

less yield stress t *,

y up to the limit where the sphere appears to become motionless. The

transitional shapes of the yielded/unyielded regions from a fluid state to a completely plastic state

have also been demonstrated. Furthermore, the inconsistency of results relating to the extent

and shape of the yielded/unyielded regions postulated by different researchers can now be

explained, i.e., all postulates are correct under the right physical conditions, i.e., a combination

of geometry and Bingham number.

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

(NSERC) and the Ontario Center for Materials Research (OCMR) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1] J. Blackery and E. Mitsoulis, Creeping Motion of a Sphere in Tubes Filled with a Bingham Plastic Material, J.

Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., (1997) in press.

[2] T.C. Papanastasiou, Flow of Materials with Yield, J. Rheol. 31 (1987) 385 – 404.

[3] R.W. Ansley, T.N. Smith, Motion of Spherical Particles in a Bingham Plastic, AIChE J. 13 (1967) 1193 – 1196.

[4] N. Yoshioka, K. Adachi, H. Ishimura, On Creeping Flow of a Visco-plastic Fluid past a Sphere, Kagaku

Kogaku, 10 (1971) 1144–1152 (in Japanese). See also K. Adachi and N. Yoshioka, On Creeping Flow of a

Visco-plastic Fluid past a Cylinder, Chem. Eng. Sci. 28 (1973) 215 – 226.

M. Beaulne, E. Mitsoulis / J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 72 (1997) 55–71 71

[5] A.N. Beris, J.A. Tsamopoulos, R.C. Armstrong, R.A. Brown, Creeping Motion of a Sphere through a Bingham

Plastic, J. Fluid Mech. 158 (1985) 219–244.

[6] D.D. Atapattu, R.P. Chhabra, P.H.T. Uhlherr, Creeping Sphere Motion in Herschel – Bulkley Fluids: Flow Field

and Drag, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 59 (1995) 245 – 265.

[7] D.D. Atapattu, R.P. Chhabra, P.H.T. Uhlherr, Wall Effect for Spheres Falling at Small Reynolds Number in a

Viscoplastic Medium, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 38 (1990) 31 – 42.

[8] E. Mitsoulis, S.S. Abdali, N.C. Markatos, Flow Simulation of Herschel – Bulkley Fluids through Extrusion Dies,

Can. J. Chem. Eng. 71 (1993) 147–160.

[9] D. Gu, R.I. Tanner, The Drag on a Sphere in a Power-Law Fluid, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 17 (1985)

1–12.

[10] R.P. Chhabra and P.H.T. Uhlherr, Static Equilibrium and Motion of Spheres in Viscoplastic Liquids, in: N.P.

Cheremisinoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 7, Chapter 21, Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX, 1988,

pp. 611–633.

[11] J.A. Tsamopoulos, M.F. Chen, A.V. Borkar, On the Spin Coating of Viscoplastic Fluids, Rheol. Acta 35 (1996)

597–615.

[12] E.J. O’Donovan, R.I. Tanner, Numerical Study of the Bingham Squeeze Film Problem, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid

Mech. 15 (1984) 75–83.

[13] C.R. Beverly, R.I. Tanner, Numerical Analysis of Three-Dimensional Bingham Plastic Flow, J. Non-Newtonian

Fluid Mech. 42 (1992) 85–115.

- 2006, A Constrained Particle Dynamics for Continuum-particle Hybrid Method in Micro- And Nano-fluidics, 2006Diunggah olehAnatoli Krasilnikov
- Pressure Drop Evaluation Along PipelinesDiunggah olehpeweaje
- 22418_21080115120037_Aulia Riswalida_Tugas 4Diunggah olehNosa Ajulva L.
- 007_SeetharamanDiunggah olehYesica Castillo Sanchez
- Numerical Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations for the EntrancDiunggah olehJoel David Gonzalez Valverde
- Wsf-4 2624 ManuscriptDiunggah olehBlue Dark
- Food TechnologyDiunggah olehdynav
- Waste Lube SynopsisDiunggah olehFarah Saad
- Fluid Mech ModuleDiunggah olehcmahendr
- Determination of the Arrhenius Parameters of Mahogany Seed Oil Using Viscosity Flow DataDiunggah olehInternational Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
- Microsoft Power Point - Fluids -Senatorlibya [Compatibility Mode]Diunggah olehsenator.libya
- FluidDiunggah olehneerajtrip123
- LessonPlanDiffusion_122115smDiunggah olehAmar Alansi
- Andritos & HanrattyDiunggah olehMohit Kulkarni
- ME 305 Part 1 Fundamental Fluid and Flow PropertiesDiunggah olehJackie Henderson
- zhang et al.pdfDiunggah olehharman2026
- Hose Surge ReportDiunggah olehtoyuedoxx
- 305.3.pptxDiunggah olehStephen Au
- WL22SDL_400-P-160121-E-01Diunggah olehEng-Mohammed Salem
- 2445803 Fluent Tutorial 01Diunggah olehrajamannar322
- Deformation of Non Crystal LinesDiunggah olehKaushik Sreenivas
- Fedele - (2011) - Viscosity Water Based SWCNH and TiO2Diunggah olehpratikmitra30
- GRE-Prep (1)Diunggah olehkabbirhossain
- CHEN 311 Syllabus Fall 2015Diunggah olehAmy Miller
- Chap01(Part2) Properties of FluidDiunggah olehFaris Syahmi
- 982666-High Quality Base Oils for Next Generation Automatic Transmission FluidsDiunggah olehPiao
- D1084.11179Diunggah olehJEISON ESTEBAN YUCUMA MARTINEZ
- Lab_Mixing_Compaction_Temps.pdfDiunggah olehGeomanjeri
- syllabusDiunggah olehYasaswi Parupudi
- Test Plan - Immersed HX Tank_May2012-1Diunggah olehAnkit Lonare

- Grade4-41036-11-9688.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-38-2653Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-4103-9-3480Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- 4. Buoyancy ObjectiveDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-32-9741Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- ASEJ-D-13-00069.pdfDiunggah olehmkb
- Modelling of Drug Relase...Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Registration Form_4th Yr.xlsDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-11-9688.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-13-1258.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- 1st Year B.tech Syllabus Revised 18.08.10Diunggah olehSoumya Sinha
- Engineering OutcomesDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Accreditation as Revised July 2011Diunggah oleharun_mohan_t1068
- Alternating CurrentDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-25-7276Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-19-9786Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-91156-1-3384Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-16-1535Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-91156-3-9670Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-29-3742Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-91156-4-9677Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-6-8424.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-11-9688.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-13-1258.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-13-1258.pdfDiunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-14-9875Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-20-7974Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-33-8512Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-40-3400Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee
- Grade4-41036-25-7276Diunggah olehMoloyBanerjee

- Types of Computer SystemsDiunggah olehVinoth Raj
- Computer GraphicsDiunggah olehsadhanamca1
- Annealing-Test-1 (1)Diunggah olehAndy Tan WX
- Cover LetterDiunggah olehEmad Elsaid
- Definiciones básicas de controlDiunggah olehGustavo Meza
- 85001-0269 -- Intelligent PS Multi Sensor DetectorDiunggah olehhoramm31
- Alarm_description_LTE.xlsxDiunggah olehDoni Ariyanto
- Excel - Get the Most (1)Diunggah olehVarun Rastogi
- LRFD-BASED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BEARINGS IN BRIDGES 9-24-2010 compressed.pdfDiunggah olehFrancis Domingo
- e18546Diunggah olehthangbom8008
- OSCILLATORSDiunggah olehapi-26100966
- 37163893-1c1d-44b9-ac25-3c467ed44cbfDiunggah olehziaddd
- Prediccion RnaDiunggah olehGerardo Vera Pacco
- A Flexible Software for Tracking of Markers Used in HumanDiunggah olehJuan Diego Pulgarín-Giraldo
- Alpha Chiang - Elements of Dynamic ionDiunggah olehBodescu Daniel
- Hypothesis Testing Betsy FarberDiunggah olehMichael Mcneil
- X2_Text recognition.pdfDiunggah olehMohammed A Isa
- Rr211001 Electrical TechnologyDiunggah olehSrinivasa Rao G
- tm_11-5855-214-23&p - (N04596).pdfDiunggah olehtyra24
- IPP60R385CP_rev2.2Diunggah olehd613961
- Matrices inverses RevisionDiunggah olehMenaka
- 4. Pressure Build-Up AnalysisDiunggah olehMohamed Aoudi
- Delta KVol50No2Diunggah olehOscar Reynaga Alarcón
- Thanuja Pubudini_Peiris_Thesis.pdfDiunggah olehNguyễn Nhân
- Implications of variable waste placement conditions for MSW landfillsDiunggah olehderland
- Design Procedures SAP 2000Diunggah olehAshish ɐʇoʞdɐs
- Canned motoer pumpDiunggah olehSteve Wan
- D7 and D9Diunggah olehPranjal Saikia
- K63&65REBUILDDiunggah olehpepin1971
- EMV v4.3 Book 1 ICC to Terminal Interface 2012060705394541Diunggah olehSunil Shenava