Although the issue of sustainability has been recognised explicitly since the 1970s,
some developing countries have begun to achieve sustained economic growth and
industrialisation on the standard ‘fossil fuel and automobile based consumer
economy’, first the ‘Asian Tigers’, then China and India. China and India offers a
unique opportunity to assess its limitations. China’s success, for example, is
bringing massive increases in consumption (grain, meat, steel oil, timber). China’s
revolutionary economic growth demonstrates the flaws with the conventional
growth model. It shows the need for systemic change in the way development is
understood and brought about globally: in the west as much as elsewhere. The
earth is at a tipping point: business as usual is no longer an option. The present
global dilemma offers huge risks, but also outstanding opportunities. The need to
create a ‘sustainable post fossil-fuel society and economy’ has never been more
widely recognised. Climate change has immediate implications for other
phenomena such as sea level and extreme events. The occurrence of disasters in
2005 and 2006 (numerous hurricanes and tropical storms, earthquakes, flooding,
famine) is major examples. The coastal location of the world’s largest cities exposes
huge numbers of people to potential future risk and is therefore a prime aim of
sustainability in the 21st century. Furthermore, we are unsure of the unforeseen
social, environmental, economic or health consequences of new technology and
there is a pressing need to reinstate biodiversity and ecosystems that we have
removed.
1|Page
Joe Blakey 13L
The Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) was a composite index published from
1999 to 2005 that tracked 21 elements of environmental sustainability covering
natural resource endowments (Funds or property donated to an institution,
individual, or group as a source of income), past and present pollution levels,
environmental management efforts, contributions to protection of the global
commons (any of the earth's ubiquitous and unowned natural resources, such as
the oceans, the atmosphere, and space), and a society's capacity to improve its
environmental performance over time. It was superseded by the Environmental
Performance Index in 2006. The Environmental Performance Index (EPI) is a method
of quantifying and numerically benchmarking the environmental performance of a
country's policies.
The world average of the ESI is 49.9, and Finland has the highest score with 75.1,
while the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has the lowest with 11.7. The five
highest ranking countries are Finland, Norway, Uruguay, Sweden, and Iceland, while
the five lowest countries are the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Iraq,
Taiwan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
2|Page
Joe Blakey 13L
3|Page
Joe Blakey 13L
4|Page
Joe Blakey 13L
c) Comment on the link between environmental sustainability and GDP
For the year 2005, Finland, an MEDC, attained the highest ESI score at 75.1, Haiti however, an LEDC,
attained the sixth worst at 34.8. They have a difference of 40.3 ESI points, which is in fact greater than Haiti’s
overall score. There is some fundamental “noise” associated with ESI rankings as of the judgement and
compilation of the 21 individual indicators. However, due to the sizeable difference in ESI, I can say with near
certain confidence that Finland is vastly outperforming Haiti. The picture may be different however if I were
to compare Finland with Norway at 73.4, where the outperformance is greatly uncertain.
In 1925, Haiti was lush, with 60% of its original forest covering the lands and mountainous regions. Since
then, the population has cut down an estimated 98% of its original forest cover for use as fuel for cookstoves,
and in the process has destroyed fertile farmland soils, contributing to desertification. Finland on the other
hand is very stringent with its forestry protection, especially under EU legislation; whereas Haiti has no such
governing pressures. Forest covers 86% of the country's area and it is the largest forested area in Europe.
Other factors are similarly polarised, Finland has reduced pollution and improved its environmental quality
through pioneering approaches like green taxes. Haiti however, as an undeveloped country has not reached the
turning point on the Kuznets curve, if we are to apply it. Furthermore, a lot of MEDC pollution ends up in
Haiti, for instance, there is a significant issue with plastic pollution, contributing to the anthropogenic
degradation of land which is used as an indicator of ESI. But yet on the other hand, Haiti is so poor that the
prevalence of vehicles is so low that it “is simply too poor to have air pollution.”
Water strain is also one of the indicators taken in to account for the ESI ranking. As a developed wealthy
nation, Finland would be able to bring in its water if it didn’t have its temperate climate and 55,000 lakes that
are 200 or more meters wide providing water access for all. Haiti on the other hand is at low latitude so
5|Page
Joe Blakey 13L
rainfall is significantly less, so water strain is greater. Whilst on the topic of physical influences, it is also
important to mention it has a high prevalence for natural disasters, such as the 2010 earthquake, which
impeded development and available funds to contribute to environmental improvement and also means
persistent rebuilding of infrastructure and property and the associated environmental impacts of doing so
cheaply. Energy efficiency is also likely to be poor, if an LEDC has natural resources it is likely to exploit
them in an attempt to spur on industrialisation, or have them exploited by other MEDCs, such as is looking
likely with the new found oil in Haiti. Developed nations such as Finland are unlikely to do this under
restraints of trading groups, or simply do not have it. Furthermore, due to the cheaper labour costs in LEDCs
and the environmental restraints in MEDCs, TNCs are likely to locate production plants in countries such as
this. The environmental pollution attributed to this can be seen if we look back to the UK in the 80s, the same
situation has simply moved abroad.
6|Page