Do you know sir, that until you came along I believe that she loved me
almost as girls love their lovers. I know I loved her so. Don’t you
wonder that I can stand the sight of you.
Mary Hallock to Richard, December 13, 1873
1874 Foote’s Cabin at Leadville
Whitman and Peter Doyle Whitman and Harry Stafford Whitman with Warren Fritzinger
Inverts/Fairies/Queers/Passing Women
gender nonconforming: masculine women, feminine men
sex with others of same sex is consequence of gender nonconformity
butches, passing women, mannish women, fairies, queers
Heterosexuals
and
Homosexuals
circa 1950
“The Heterosexual Counterrevolution”
William lee Howard, “Effeminate Men and Masculine Women” New York
Medical Journal 1900
Note: Already in 1900 there was an effort to move the independent woman,
perhaps politically active fighting for the right to vote, into the same class
with the invert, pervert, and degenerate.
Remember the
Episcopal clergy from
Newport ?
There too there was an
effort to move gender-
conforming single men
(clergy) with close
attachments to other
men (sailors) from the
“normal” category to
that of the deviate.
Charles Tomlinson Griffes M. Carey Thomas Mary Elizabeth Garrett
Alfred Kinsey 1894-1956
New York Daily News Arriving in back in the United States after
December 1, 1952 sex change in Denmark.
Normal Men and Women Queers / Inverts
Femme Butch
Romantic Friends
The most committed cross-gender identifications find a place in the new category of the
transsexual.
1943
Women’s Army Corps
South Post Office Gang
Blue Discharge, 1943
1951 or 1952
Left to right: Dale Jennings, Harry Hay, Rudy
Gernreich, Stan Witt, Bob Hull, Chuck
Rowland, and Paul Bernard.
One Magazine 1953-69
Daughters of Bilitis, founded in San Francisco, 1955
Christine Jorgensen
Unlike other women I had to become super-female. I couldn’t have one single
masculine trait.
I as much good publicity as possible for the sake of all those to whom I am a
representation of themselves.
1965
Homophile
organizations
march in front of
the White House
to protest federal
government’s
treatment of
homosexuals.
Harry Benjamin
Reed Erickson Publications of the Erickson The Transsexual
1917-1992 Educational Foundation Phenomenon 1966
What was Different about Mid Century?
But there are actually two faces to the invisibility of homosexuality / transsexuality
1. the government tries to expose the homosexual
2. the homo- or transsexual can disclose their deviance: coming out
Christine Jorgensen, the organizers of Mattachine and Daughters of Bilitis
San Francisco Los Angeles New York
August 1966 Winter 1967 June 1969
Note the lesbian and gay male couples. Each comprises two people of the same sex
who look more or less the same. They are not butch-femme. They are not fairies
and decoys. They are not young and old. The are homo (“the same”) to a degree
never before seen. This becomes the public face of the lesbian/gay movement for
several decades: gender conforming men and women loving others of the same sex
and “coming out”--declaring their minority identity even though they might
otherwise not have attracted notice.
As for the gender conformity: don’t be deceived by the short-haired women and the
long-haired men. The women were affected not only by the gay liberation movement
but also by the women’s movement: their short hair is much more likely a sign that
they have thrown off traditional, oppressive notions of femininity than that they
want to present themselves as masculine. The men’s long hair is simply the standard
for politically active, anti-authoritarian young white men in the 1960s and 70s.
The gender non-conformers are gradually pushed to the sidelines, both in the
popular imagination and in the emerging lesbian/gay civil rights movement.
Crawford Barton Two Men Kissing, San Francisco, 1970s
1970 Woman Identified 1976 DYKE Magazine
Woman Manifesto
1972 1976
Please note: this is a tremendous political achievement. It does not represent the
revelation of some truth about homosexuality. It represents the self-fashioning by a
group of people faced with certain historical pressures and certain historical
opportunities in a way that enabled them to enjoy middle class privilege.
The emergence of queer and especially transgender activism in the 1990s bring
gender non-conformity back into the picture to an extent not seen for 50 years.
Queer activists challenged the “homonormativity” of middle class lesbian and
gay assimilationists and their dominance of national organizations. Transgender
activists fought on many fronts--to organize a movement of their own, to
counter violence against trans people, to gain access to medical technologies they
needed, and also to force established lesbian and gay organizations to accept
trans issues as their own.