The manuscript was received on 25 December 2009 and was accepted after revision for publication on 29 June 2010.
DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1472
ignition, which uses small diesel sprays as the ignition control of the combustion process, other LTC con-
sources, offers the advantages of multiple ignition cepts utilize early or late direct fuel injection.
centres and higher energy densities compared with Although early- and late-injection LTC concepts
conventional spark ignition. Gebert et al. [9] showed have their own advantages and drawbacks, the key
that the energy associated with a pilot diesel spray idea in both approaches is to ensure that the end of
volume of 1 mm3 is approximately two orders of fuel injection (EOI) is separated from the start of
magnitude greater than the energy provided by a spark. combustion (SOC) by ‘sufficiently long’ ignition de-
Therefore, the quality of ignition is better with diesel lay periods [17]. By comparison, both fuel injection
pilot ignition, and spatially dispersed, multiple-ignition and combustion events occur simultaneously in
centres lead to faster burn rates compared to single- conventional diesel engines, resulting in high NOx
point ignition sources. and PM emissions. Consequently, this separation
In pilot-ignited natural-gas engines, the natural- between the EOI and the SOC is necessary to reap
gas–air mixture is inducted during the intake stroke the NOx and PM benefits of LTC.
and ignited towards the end of compression by small Kalghatgi and co-workers [14–16] achieved con-
diesel sprays. These dual-fuel engines yield low trolled LTC at relatively high loads (indicated mean
oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and particulate matter effective pressure (IMEP), approximately 15 bar)
(PM) emissions and fuel conversion efficiencies by resorting to partially premixed combustion with
comparable with conventional diesel engines. How- gasoline. They demonstrated that late injection of
ever, high unburned hydrocarbon (HC) emissions, gasoline yielded low NOx and PM emissions by in-
cycle-to-cycle variations at low loads, and tendency creasing ignition delays substantially compared with
to knock at high loads are known problems in dual- diesel fuels. Since diesel is easier to autoignite than
fuel engines [6]. One approach for retaining the NOx gasoline, the maximum allowable engine loads in
benefits of dual-fuel engines is maximization of diesel-fuelled LTC HCCI are lower than for gasoline.
natural-gas substitution or minimization of diesel These results indicate that low-cetane fuels that are
usage [8]. To reduce NOx emissions further without highly resistant to autoignition (e.g. gasoline and
natural gas) can yield controlled LTC over a wide
compromising HC emissions or fuel conversion
range of engine operating conditions.
efficiency, more sophisticated diesel injection sys-
tems (than conventional mechanical injection sys-
tems) that can consistently and reliably meter very
2 ADVANCED-INJECTION LOW-PILOT-IGNITED
small diesel quantities are required [7]. Better pilot NATURAL-GAS COMBUSTION
injection systems will also enable dual-fuel low-
temperature combustion (LTC) strategies to be Dual–fuel experiments [18–20] performed with a
adopted. common-rail low-pilot-injection system established
For conventional spark ignition (SI) and compres- that engine-out NOx emissions can be reduced to
sion ignition engine combustion, Flynn et al. [10] about 0.2 g/kW h over a wide range of engine loads
concluded that engine-out NOx emissions are in- when very small diesel sprays (providing 2–3 per
evitable and may not be decreased below a limit cent of total fuel energy) are injected early in
because the local in-cylinder temperatures are usu- the compression stroke (about 60u before top dead
ally higher than 2000 K. Therefore, to meet future centre (before TDC)) to ignite premixed natural-gas–
emissions standards and to increase fuel conversion air mixtures. The penalty on fuel conversion effi-
efficiencies simultaneously, LTC concepts that can ciencies was minimal despite the remarkable reduc-
provide controlled engine operation at high engine tion in NOx emissions; however, HC and carbon
loads (brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), greater monoxide (CO) emissions increased substantially at
than 10 bar) are desirable. Different approaches have advanced injection timings. This partially premixed
been investigated to realize LTC operation with LTC concept has been termed advanced-injection
gasoline and diesel fuels. These include, among low-pilot-ignited natural-gas (ALPING) combustion
others, homogeneous charge compression ignition [20]. By combining a low-cetane main fuel (natural
(HCCI) [11], early-injection LTC (e.g. the UNIBUS gas) and early injection of a high-cetane pilot fuel
concept [12]), late-injection LTC with aggressive (diesel), the EOI and the SOC were separated to
exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and swirl ratios [13], achieve controlled LTC for a BMEP of up to 12 bar.
and partially premixed LTC [14–16] with low-cetane It is hypothesized that the ALPING combustion
fuels. Combustion control issues with HCCI limit process combines some aspects of both conven-
the maximum attainable BMEPs. To provide better tional diesel and SI engine combustion. Early in-
jection (the beginning of (pilot) injection (BOI)) of 3 bar. Also, the earliest possible BOI was extended
pilot diesel leads to a very long ignition delay period from 60u before TDC without EGR to 70u before TDC
because the local in-cylinder temperatures at BOI with hot EGR.
are not conducive to ignition. Over the long ignition
delay period, the pilot sprays disperse and mix with
the surrounding natural-gas–air mixture. When the
3 OBJECTIVES
piston approaches top dead centre (TDC) and the
local temperatures become high enough to initiate
A phenomenological simulation that provides a
and sustain rapid pre-ignition reactions, the diesel
framework for predicting dual-fuel, partially pre-
autoignites (simultaneously or in rapid succession)
mixed LTC can be employed to gain deeper insights
at different locations inside the cylinder. These
into ALPING combustion, especially at early BOIs,
spatially distributed ignition centres foster the
which yielded very low NOx emissions. Phenomen-
creation of several ‘flamelets’ that result in localized
ological combustion models are routinely used to
flame propagation through the lean mixture of
simulate performance and emissions in diesel
natural gas (mostly methane) and air. These dis-
engines [24–26]. For simulating dual-fuel engine
tributed flamelets ensure large enflamed areas, thus
combustion, several models have been developed.
resulting in faster energy release rates and good fuel
They range from relatively simple two-zone models
conversion efficiencies.
[27] to increasingly complex multi-zone models [28]
The range of equivalence ratio (w) values (based on
(some of which include detailed chemical kinetics
both diesel and natural gas) encountered in ALPING
[29–31]), and multi-dimensional models [32]. These
combustion lies between 0.2 (for low loads) and 0.6
models predict conventional dual-fuel engine per-
(for high loads). Whereas it was previously thought
formance and emissions satisfactorily. However, as
that flame propagation in methane–air mixtures was
discussed above, ALPING combustion differs sig-
limited to a lean flammability limit of w < 0.5 for
nificantly from conventional dual-fuel engine com-
atmospheric flames, recent numerical simulations
bustion. A review of the literature revealed that no
[21] suggested that, once ignition is achieved, flame
existing models have been developed to simulate
propagation may occur even at much leaner equiva-
dual-fuel, partially premixed LTC explicitly at very
lence ratios (w < 0.2) under engine-like conditions of
early BOIs. Consequently, the specific objectives of
temperature and pressure. This evidence supports the
the present work are as follows:
hypothesis that flame propagation may occur from
multiple ignition centres in ALPING combustion. (a) to develop a multi-zone phenomenological
The research of Kalghatgi and co-workers [14–16] simulation of ALPING combustion and to
emphasizes the performance and emissions benefits predict the cylinder pressure and heat release
of partially premixed LTC strategies. The ALPING histories over a range of BOIs, with specific
combustion process is a partially premixed LTC con- emphasis on understanding combustion at
cept realized with a specific combination of two early BOIs (50–60u before TDC);
fuels: an easily ignitable fuel (e.g. diesel) is used to (b) to use the ALPING combustion simulation to
initiate lean premixed combustion of a relatively investigate the effects of the intake manifold
difficult-to-ignite fuel (e.g. natural gas). Since diesel temperature, pilot fuel quantity, and natural-gas
is just sufficiently (but not completely) premixed equivalence ratios for the early BOI of 60u before
with the natural-gas–air mixture, ALPING combus- TDC.
tion occurs at locally lean equivalence ratios for early
BOIs, thereby leading to lower local temperatures 4 MODEL DEVELOPMENT
and very low NOx emissions. Further, with lean
premixed ALPING combustion, PM emissions are A multi-zone phenomenological combustion model
also expected to be insignificant compared with that simulates closed-cycle engine processes has
conventional diesel combustion. High HC and CO been developed. The primary objective of the model
emissions and poor low-load engine stability with is to simulate early-BOI ALPING combustion, which
ALPING combustion were addressed in hot EGR is significantly more difficult to predict than re-
experiments [22, 23], which yielded 70 per cent HC tarded-BOI combustion. In ALPING combustion, the
emissions reduction, efficiency improvement by 5 initial pilot combustion phase is somewhat similar
percentage points, and more stable engine operation to diesel spray combustion while the subsequent
with virtually no NOx penalty at BMEPs of 6 bar and natural-gas combustion phase involves premixed
turbulent combustion by flame propagation (simi- and energy added owing to combustion in the
lar to an SI engine). Therefore, the present model packets or the flame zone. The second and third
incorporates phenomenological aspects of both terms represent the boundary work output and
diesel spray combustion and premixed turbulent the net enthalpy input due to any mass transfer
flame propagation. respectively. Of these energy interactions, heat trans-
The simulation starts from intake valve closure fer and boundary work are experienced by all zones.
(IVC) and proceeds until exhaust valve opening. Specific details of energy and mass interactions,
Depending on the stage of the simulation, the together with the submodels used in different zones,
cylinder contents are divided into one or more of are discussed later.
the following zones: an unburned zone, pilot fuel
zones (packets), a flame zone, and a burned zone, as
shown schematically in Fig. 1. While the different 4.1 Model assumptions
zones are illustrated as continuous and contiguous
The important assumptions of the phenomenologi-
for ease of visualization, it should not be construed
cal ALPING combustion simulation are listed below.
that they are necessarily so; in fact, at advanced
BOIs, packets can be dispersed throughout the 1. Each zone is treated as an open thermodynamic
cylinder, forming distributed ignition centres. Since system consisting of a mixture of ideal gases.
the simulation is only quasi-dimensional and is 2. Heat transfer occurs only between each zone and
not capable of providing spatial resolution of the the cylinder walls. Although mass transfer is
cylinder contents, it does not require any of these allowed between zones, interzonal heat transfer
zones to be continuous or contiguous. is neglected.
The generic form of the energy equation for a 3. Since the natural gas used in ALPING combustion
given zone i (an open thermodynamic system) is experiments was largely composed of methane
(98 vol %), methane is assumed to represent
dðmi cvi Ti Þ X dQi P dVi X dmi
~ { z hi ð1Þ natural gas in the simulation and n-dodecane is
dh net in
dh dh net in
dh assumed to represent diesel fuel.
4. When diesel and natural gas burn in any zone,
where mi is the mass, cvi is the specific heat at they are converted into products of complete
constant volume, Ti is the temperature, and all combustion (carbon dioxide (CO2) and water
derivatives are with respect to the crank angle (CA) h. (H2O)).
The first term on the right-hand side of equation (1) 5. The end of combustion (EOC) is attained when
is the net heat input into the zone, which includes the unburned zone mass becomes very small (less
heat transfer from and to the cylinder walls and, if than 0.001 per cent of its initial value) or more
applicable, energy lost owing to diesel evaporation than 99.9 per cent of the total entrained mass in
the flame zone has been burned.
tion of the burned zone). A user-specified number of taken (in degrees CA) for the spray to penetrate a
packets is sequentially injected throughout the characteristic entrainment distance equal to the
injection duration and an axisymmetric diesel spray cylinder bore radius. From a physical perspective,
is assumed. As shown in Fig. 2, packets are classified hch can be interpreted as the time taken to entrain
on the basis of their time of entry into the cylinder (I) the surrounding fluid completely into the diesel
and the anticipated radial stratification in unburned spray or the time taken for the diesel spray to engulf
mixture entrainment across the spray (J). In other the entire combustion chamber volume. To calculate
words, J packets of equal diesel mass are injected hch, spray penetration is determined using the
every time step over the duration of injection, correlation recommended by Dent [33]. While other
leading to a constant rate of fuel injection. A higher more sophisticated spray penetration models (e.g.
value of I indicates that the packet is injected the Siebers [34] model) are certainly available, the
relatively later in the injection process, while a Dent model has been adopted in the present work
higher value of J indicates that the packet’s location because it is more straightforward to implement in a
is closer to the spray axis and less capable of phenomenological context. In any case, the spray
entraining unburned mixture. Although spatial pac- penetration model used in the current entrainment
ket locations are not determined in this model, this model only affects overall entrainment indirectly (via
method of packet identification allows appropriate hch) compared with the entrainment constant K,
stratification of mixture entrainment across the spray, which is an important model parameter, as dis-
and, in this sense, the entrainment model is quasi- cussed below.
dimensional. In the following paragraphs, various From the aforementioned scaling arguments, the
submodels relevant to the packets including mixture total rate dmtot-ent/dh of unburned mass entrained
entrainment, diesel evaporation, ignition, and diesel into the spray must be directly proportional to the
and natural-gas combustion are discussed. unburned-zone mass and inversely proportional to
the characteristic entrainment time and can be
written as
4.3.1 Mixture entrainment model
dmtot-ent mu
The phenomenological basis of the entrainment ! ð2Þ
dh hch
model is the recognition that the mixture entrain-
ment into the spray is simultaneously governed by Since the total unburned entrained mass is distrib-
several factors. Since the spray can entrain unburned uted among a total number of Itot 6 Jtot packets,
mixture only if it is available, the entrainment rate dmtot-ent/dh is divided by Itot 6 Jtot. Also, proper
is proportional to the unburned-zone mass mu. stratification in mixture entrainment must be en-
Further, all the available unburned mixture can be sured in the direction normal to the spray axis and
entrained into the spray in a characteristic entrain- for packets injected later in the injection process.
ment time hch, which is assumed to be the time Finally, the decay of spray entrainment as the spray
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of packets classification showing spray entrainment and radial
stratification
disintegrates and loses its initial momentum must be BOIs in ALPING combustion [37, 38]. Therefore, the
captured. Based on these considerations and follow- Shell autoignition model [39] was used to model
ing Bell [35], the mass ment of mixture entrained into ignition in each packet. The Shell model employs
any packet (I, J) in one calculation step Dh is generic species in a global eight-step chain-branch-
expressed as ing reaction mechanism of hydrocarbon ignition and
includes the reactions for chain initiation, propaga-
mu Dh I J tion, branching, and termination. The original model
ment ðI, J Þ~K exp { ð3Þ
Itot Jtot ð1zY Þ hch Itot Jtot coefficients for fuel with a research octane number
(RON) of 90 (assuming n-dodecane stoichiometry)
where K is the entrainment constant, which is an were used with the exception of the pre-exponential
important model parameter that influences the net factor Ap3 controlling fuel consumption in the
spray momentum, Y is the ratio of time elapsed since propagation cycle, which was modified from the
the BOI to the total injection duration, and Itot and original value of 161013 to 861011 to provide better
Jtot are the maximum values of I and J respectively. ignition delay predictions [37].
The exponential term in equation (3) accounts for Pre-ignition energy release, which is predicted in
stratification of entrainment across the spray and the ignition model, raises the packet temperatures,
progressively lower entrainment in packets that are and ignition of a packet is assumed to occur when
injected later in the injection process (higher I either the packet temperature exceeds 1100 K or the
values). The term 1 + Y ensures that the overall rate rate of increase in the packet temperature exceeds
of mixture entrainment in the spray decreases with 107 K/s. These two conditions have been used by
increasing elapsed time since the BOI. This mimics several researchers, including Halstead et al. [39]. In
reality because, as the spray penetrates into the addition to these ignition criteria, it is reasonable to
surroundings, its velocity decreases and eventually expect ignition to occur only if the equivalence ratio
mixture entrainment into the spray decreases. in each packet is within ignition limits. As observed by
Sazhina et al. [40], artificial enforcement of ignition
limits is necessary since the Shell model does not
4.3.2 Diesel evaporation model explicitly account for such limits. Therefore, in the
The total amount of pilot diesel fuel is initially present work, a packet is assumed to ignite if it
divided equally between all the packets, which are satisfies either of the aforementioned temperature
tracked separately thereafter. However, only evapo- criteria and its equivalence ratio is within the
rated diesel is allowed to enter the packets. All fuel assumed rich ignition and lean ignition limits of
droplets are initialized with the same initial user- w 5 3 and w 5 0.2 respectively. Upon ignition, the Shell
specified Sauter mean diameter (SMD). Following ignition model is deactivated for the packet and the
Kanury [36], the droplet evaporation rates are cal- packet combustion model is triggered.
culated using a quasi-steady isolated droplet eva-
poration model in which the evaporation rates
adjust instantly to the temperature and species con- 4.3.4 Packet combustion model
centration changes. At the end of each time step, the After a packet ignites, diesel is allowed to burn ac-
droplet diameters in each packet are updated on the cording to the single-step global reaction mechan-
basis of the remaining liquid volumes. ism adapted from Westbrook and Dryer [41], which
is given by
The turbulent mass burn rate m_ b is proportional to ‘dumping’) is expected to capture hot regions of
the total unburned mass (total entrained mass – total burned products in packets, which lead to most of
burned mass) in the flame zone and is determined the NOx formed during combustion. When all
from the equation packets are dumped, the flame area becomes zero,
the flame zone ceases to exist, and combustion is
metot {mbtot terminated.
_ b~
m zru Af SL ð14Þ
tb
where metot is the cumulative mass entrained into 4.6 Heat transfer model
the flame zone, mbtot is the cumulative mass burned
The overall heat transfer rate dQtot/dh from cylinder
in the flame zone, and tb is the characteristic burn
gases to cylinder walls is determined using the
time, which is determined as
Woschni [53] heat transfer correlation and the
C3 l average cylinder temperature Tavg. Following refer-
tb ~ ð15Þ ence [35], the heat transfer rate dQi/dh from each
SL
zone i is obtained by weighting dQtot/dh with the
The burn time represents the characteristic time area (computed as volume raised to the two-thirds
taken for laminar burning to occur in a length scale power) and temperature Ti of that zone according to
corresponding to the Taylor scale l. The constant C3 2=3
was assigned a value of 2.5 following reference [48]. dQi dQtot Vi ðTi {Twall Þ
~ P 2=3 ð17Þ
Assuming isotropic turbulence, l is calculated from dh dh V ðTi {Twall Þ
i i
the expression [51]
1=2 {1=2 where Vi is the zone volume and Twall is the cylinder
l 15 u’L wall temperature (set equal to 480 K).
~ ð16Þ
L A n
where the constant A is set equal to 1, n (5 m/rf) is the 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
kinematic viscosity, and the dynamic viscosity m is
determined from the expression m 5 3.361027 Tf0:7 In this section, predictions from the phenomenolo-
given in reference [52]. gical simulation are compared with experimental
results at different BOIs for ALPING combustion.
The flame zone heat release rate is evaluated as
The engine details and operating conditions (used as
the product of the mass burn rate and the lower
model inputs) are given in Table 1. A 2.4 l single-
heating value of methane. The mass burned in the
cylinder research engine equipped with a dedicated
flame zone in one time step is transferred to the
pilot injection system was used for the ALPING
burned zone in the subsequent time step.
experiments. The diesel injected quantity was fixed
at 3.3 g/min (the minimum value possible with the
injection system) for all BOIs to ensure minimal NOx
4.5 Burned zone
The burned zone is formed one time step after the Table 1 Engine details and operating conditions
SOC and contains burned products transferred every Parameter Specification
time step from the flame zone. The burned products Engine type Single cylinder, four stroke
in a packet are not transferred to the burned zone Bore (mm) 137
until the following conditions are satisfied: first, the Stroke (mm) 165
Compression ratio 14.5
packet temperature is lower than a critical tempera- Combustion system Direct injection, Mexican hat
ture (1900 K), below which NOx formation rates will Diesel injection system Electronic, common rail
Diesel injector Pencil type, four holes
become negligible, and, second, either more than 90 BOI Variable (20–60u before TDC)
per cent of diesel and natural gas in a packet have Diesel injection pressure (bar) 359.5
burned or their reaction rates have become less than Diesel injected quantity (g/min) 3.3
Diesel injection duration (deg CA) 5
1 per cent of their maximum values. Natural-gas fuelling rate (g/min) 77.3–94.0 (variable with BOI)
When both the first condition and the second Engine speed (r/min) 1700
Experimental BMEP associated 6
condition are satisfied, all packet contents are with fuelling rates (bar)
allowed to mix instantaneously and adiabatically Intake manifold pressure (kPa) 181
Intake manifold temperature (K) 348
with the burned zone. This mixing process (termed
emissions. However, natural-gas fuelling was varied mentally derived heat release rates are ‘differen-
to maintain a BMEP of 6 bar for all BOIs at a constant tiated’ quantities that are dependent either on local
speed of 1700 r/min. The intake manifold pressure packet conditions or on the pressure derivative,
and the temperature were fixed at 181 kPa and 348 K while cylinder pressures are ‘integrated global’
respectively. All the model parameters were cali- quantities. Therefore, while comparing the experi-
brated (see reference [38] for details) for a baseline mental and predicted heat release rates throughout
test case (the 40u before TDC BOI) and systematic this paper, it is important to remember that,
model sensitivity studies were performed to obtain although the cylinder pressures may be predicted
optimal values (Table 2). Subsequently, all model satisfactorily, a perfect match between the heat
parameters (except Jtot as discussed below) were held release rates may not exist. In fact, some differences
constant for all other experimental conditions (dif- may be expected in the heat release histories
ferent BOIs) discussed in this paper. The simulation because of the fundamental differences between
was first validated with experimental pressure and the combustion models used in the simulation and
heat release histories over the entire range of BOIs the experimental heat release analysis and their
from 20u before TDC to 60u before TDC. Then, model associated assumptions and limitations. The diffi-
predictions at the early BOI of 60u before TDC were culties in matching the experimental and simulated
examined closely. Finally, parametric studies were heat release and the accuracy to which the heat
performed at the early BOI of 60u before TDC with release histories can be predicted were also dis-
different intake charge temperatures, pilot fuel cussed by Hountalas et al. [54] for diesel engines.
quantities, and natural-gas equivalence ratios.
Fig. 4 Comparison of the experimental and predicted heat release rates (HRRs) and cylinder
pressures P for different BOIs
Fig. 11 Detailed results for the 60u before TDC BOI illustrating (a) the packet mass fractions, (b)
the flame-zone mass fractions, flame temperature, and total number of dumped
packets, and (c) the peak packet temperatures
Fig. 12 Effects of the intake charge temperature Tin on (a) the predicted cylinder pressure, (b)
the predicted heat release rate, and (c) the predicted peak packet temperature ranges for
the 60u before TDC BOI
from 75 uC to 105 uC, the onset of ignition is also advanced as Tin was increased. A direct outcome
progressively advanced, the peak cylinder pressures of faster combustion heat release was shorter com-
increase from about 90 bar to more than 120 bar, and bustion durations. The combustion duration de-
the location of the peak pressures also moves closer to creased by about 10u CA with increasing Tin: from
the TDC. The reasons for these trends can be found in more than 40u CA for 75 uC to 30u CA for 105 uC. The
the heat release rate profiles shown in Fig. 12(b). overall improvement in the combustion heat release
Clearly, the higher Tin led to faster pre-ignition rate, the shorter combustion duration, and the earlier
reactions and advanced the SOC by more than 10u combustion phasing at higher Tin are reflected in the
CA. In addition, the peak heat release rates increased fact that a greater fraction of packets reach higher
from about 225 J/deg for 75 uC to about 275 J/deg for peak temperatures (see Fig. 12(c)). For instance,
105 uC and the location of the peak heat release was while no packets attained the peak temperatures in
the 2800–2900 K range for 75 uC, about 7 per cent of 5.2.2 Pilot fuel quantity effects
the peak packet temperatures fell in this range for
105 uC. On the other hand, as Tin was increased from The effects of Qinj on the predicted cylinder pressure,
75 uC to 105 uC, the fraction of packets with peak heat release rate, and peak packet temperature are
temperatures lower than 1900 K decreased from 80 shown in Fig. 13. As Qinj is increased from 3.3 g/min
per cent to less than 30 per cent. Also, the average to 5.4 g/min, ignition occurs earlier, the peak
peak packet temperatures TpPEAK_AVG increased from cylinder pressures increase, and the location of the
1720 K at 75 uC to 2150 K at 105 uC, which is greater peak pressures occurs closer to the TDC. The heat
than the Tcritical NOx value of 2000 K. These trends in release rate profiles (see Fig. 13(b)) show that higher
the local (packet) temperatures indicate the potential Qinj led to a slight advancement of the SOC by about
for higher NOx formation at higher Tin. 2u CA, substantially higher peak heat release rates
Fig. 13 Effects of the pilot fuel quantity Qinj on (a) the predicted cylinder pressure, (b) the
predicted heat release rate, and (c) the predicted peak packet temperature ranges for the
60u before TDC BOI
(from about 225 J/deg for 3.3 g/min to about 375 J/ ranges is relatively unaffected by wNG with the
deg for 5.4 g/min), and earlier peak heat release exceptions of the temperature ranges below 1900 K
phasing. Higher Qinj resulted in hotter packets that and 2700–2800 K. As wNG was increased from 0.37 to
expanded rapidly, increasing the effective flame area 0.56, the fraction of low-peak-temperature (less than
and overall combustion rates. Compared with the 1900 K) packets decreased from 80 per cent to less
effects of Tin, the SOC advancement was weaker but than 70 per cent while the fraction of high-peak-
the peak heat release rates were much higher at temperature packets increased from 2 per cent to 10
higher Qinj. The higher heat release rates resulted in per cent in the 2700–2800 K range. On the other hand,
shorter combustion durations (from 40u CA for 3.3 g/ there was only a small increase in TpPEAK_AVG from
min to 25u CA for 5.4 g/min). All these combustion 1720 K at wNG 5 0.37 to 1850 K at wNG 5 0.56. While the
effects at higher Qinj combined to cause more higher TpPEAK_AVG may lead to slightly higher NOx
packets to reach higher peak temperatures, as emissions at higher wNG, this increase will probably be
evident from Fig. 13(c). As Qinj was increased from modest compared with the influences of Tin and Qinj
3.3 g/min to 5.4 g/min, the fraction of low-tempera- on NOx. This is largely because, as wNG was increased
ture packets (with peak temperatures lower than to 0.56, the TpPEAK_AVG value attained was still lower
1900 K) decreased from 80 per cent to only 10 per than the critical NOx formation temperature of
cent while high-temperature packets in the 2800– 2000 K. Consequently, engine-out NOx emissions
2900 K range increased from 0 per cent to 14 per with ALPING combustion remained very low even
cent. With increasing Qinj, TpPEAK_AVG increased from when the engine load was increased by increasing
1720 K at 3.3 g/min to 2270 K at 5.4 g/min. These wNG, a fact that was demonstrated experimentally in
trends confirm conventional wisdom in dual-fuel previous studies [18, 20].
combustion, which dictates that a higher Qinj will
probably lead to higher NOx emissions owing to
higher local temperatures. Further, when Figs 12 and 6 CONCLUSIONS
13 are compared, the impact of increasing Qinj on
the local temperatures (and the NOx emissions) is
A multi-zone phenomenological simulation has been
clearly more significant than increasing Tin.
developed to simulate partially premixed ALPING
LTC. This simulation combined, in a novel way,
5.2.3 Natural-gas equivalence ratio effects several modelling aspects of diesel spray combustion
and premixed turbulent flame propagation. The
Figure 14 demonstrates the combustion behaviour cylinder contents were divided into an unburned
for the 60u before TDC BOI at different wNG but fixed zone, pilot fuel zones (or ‘packets’) that account for
Qinj (5 3.3 g/min) and Tin (5 75 uC). Since all the other diesel combustion, a flame zone for natural-gas
parameters were fixed, increasing wNG from 0.37 to combustion, and a burned zone. Predictions from
0.56 led to an overall increase (approximately 40 per the simulation were validated against experimental
cent) in the engine load (IMEP). The cylinder pressure results and parametric studies were performed,
results shown in Fig. 14(a) followed expectations in leading to the following significant conclusions.
that the peak pressures increased as the natural-gas
equivalence ratio was increased from 0.37 to 0.56. 1. The simulation predicted ALPING LTC satisfacto-
Figures 14(b) and (c) show the heat release profiles rily over a wide range of pilot injection timings
and peak packet temperatures respectively at differ- (BOI) from 20u before TDC to 60u before TDC.
ent wNG. First, with increasing wNG, there is a slight 2. The onset of ignition (predicted with the Shell
(although noticeable) delay in the SOC. Second, the autoignition model) and heat release profiles
peak heat release rates are significantly higher and the (especially combustion durations) were predicted
combustion durations are slightly shorter at higher accurately for the entire BOI range but the peak
wNG. Third, the initial heat release rates (within the pressures were slightly overpredicted for the 30u,
first 10u CA after the SOC) are not affected much by 40u, and 50u before TDC BOIs. Both the combus-
increasing wNG since the initial combustion rates in tion pressure and the heat release profiles were
the packets were probably similar as Tin and Qinj were predicted better at early BOIs, which yielded very
fixed at 75 uC and 3.3 g/min respectively. The influ- low NOx emissions in ALPING combustion ex-
ence of wNG is noticeable only later (after TDC) during periments.
flame-zone combustion. Finally, the distribution of 3. Strong coupling was observed between pilot spray
the peak packet temperatures in most temperature combustion in the packets and premixed turbu-
Fig. 14 Effects of the natural-gas equivalence ratio wNG on (a) the predicted cylinder pressure,
(b) the predicted heat release rate, and (c) the predicted peak packet temperature ranges
for the 60u before TDC BOI
lent combustion in the flame zone because pilot measured engine-out NOx emissions were extre-
diesel combustion in the packets directly affected mely low at the 60u before TDC BOI, probably
the flame area and, consequently, flame-zone because of relatively low-temperature packets that
combustion. Further, it was shown that the persisted longer in the combustion process;
number of ignition centres (packets) had a further, the average peak packet temperature
profound influence on the overall heat release TpPEAK_AVG was only 1720 K, much lower than the
rates and flame-zone combustion. critical NOx formation temperature Tcritical NOx of
4. The highest in-cylinder temperatures were ob- 2000 K. By comparison, at 20u before TDC and 40u
tained in packets, indicating that pilot diesel before TDC, the peak temperatures of long-
spray combustion is probably the dominant source residence-time packets were much higher (the
of NOx emissions in ALPING combustion. The TpPEAK_AVG values for 20u before TDC and 40u
emissions from spark ignited and diesel engines. gas engine. Int. J. Engine Res., 2007, 8(3), 289–303.
Proc. Combust. Inst., 2000, 28, 1211–1218. DOI: 10.1243/14680874JER02306.
11 Zhao, F., Asmus, T., Assanis, D., Dec, J. E., Eng, J. 24 Jung, D. and Assanis, D. N. Multi-zone DI diesel
A., and Najt, P. M. Homogeneous charge compres- spray combustion model for cycle simulation
sion ignition (HCCI) engines, 2003 (SAE Interna- studies of engine performance and emissions.
tional, Warrendale, Pennsylvania). SAE paper 2001-01-1246, 2001.
12 Hasegawa, R. and Yanagihara, H. HCCI combus- 25 Yoshizaki, T., Nishida, K., and Hiroyasu, H.
tion in DI diesel engine. SAE paper 2003-01-0745, Approach to low NOx and smoke emission engines
2003. by using phenomenological simulation. SAE paper
13 Kimura, S., Aoki, O., Kitahara, Y., and Aiyoshi- 930612, 1993.
zawa, E. Ultra-clean combustion technology com- 26 Patriotis, E. G. and Hountalas, D. T. Validation of a
bining a low-temperature and premixed combus- newly-developed quasi-dimensional combustion
tion concept for meeting future emission stan- model – application on a heavy-duty DI diesel
dards. SAE paper 2001-01-0200, 2001. engine. SAE paper 2004-01-0923, 2004.
14 Kalghatgi, G., Risberg, P., and Angstrom, H.-E. 27 Hountalas, D. T. and Papagiannakis, R. G. A
Advantages of fuels with high resistance to auto- simulation model for the combustion process of
ignition in late-injection, low-temperature, com- natural gas engines with pilot diesel fuel as an
pression ignition combustion. SAE paper 2006-01- ignition source. SAE paper 2001-01-1245, 2001.
3385, 2006. 28 Pirouzpanah, V. and Kashani, B. O. Prediction of
15 Kalghatgi, G. Auto-ignition quality of practical major pollutants emission in direct-injection, dual-
fuels and implications for fuel requirements of fuel diesel and natural gas engines. SAE paper
future SI and HCCI engines. SAE paper 2005-01- 1999-01-0841, 1999.
0239, 2005. 29 Liu, Z. and Karim, G. A. A predictive model for the
16 Risberg, P., Kalghatgi, G., Angstrom, H.-E., and combustion process in dual fuel engines. SAE
Wahlin, F. Auto-ignition quality of diesel-like fuels paper 952435, 1995.
in HCCI engines. SAE paper 2005-01-2127, 2005. 30 Liu, Z. and Karim, G. A. Simulation of combustion
17 Musculus, M. P. B. Multiple simultaneous optical processes in gas-fuelled diesel engines. Proc. IM-
diagnostic imaging of early-injection low-tempera- echE, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 1997, 211(2),
ture combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE 159–169. DOI: 10.1243/0957650971537079.
paper 2006-01-0079, 2006. 31 Khalil, E. B. and Karim, G. A. A kinetic investiga-
18 Krishnan, S. R., Srinivasan, K. K., Singh, S., Bell, tion of the role of changes in the composition of
S. R., Midkiff, K. C., Gong, W., Fiveland, S. B., and natural gas in engine applications. Trans. ASME, J.
Willi, M. Strategies for reduced NOx emissions in Engng Gas Turbines, 1997, 124, 404–411.
pilot ignited natural gas engines. Trans. ASME, J. 32 Kusaka, J., Tsuzuki, K., Daisho, Y., and Saito, T. A
Engng Gas Turbines Power, 2004, 126, 665–671. numerical study on combustion and exhaust gas
19 Singh, S., Krishnan, S. R., Srinivasan, K. K., emissions characteristics of a dual-fuel natural gas
Midkiff, K. C., and Bell, S. R. Effect of pilot engine using a multi-dimensional model combined
injection timing, pilot quantity, and intake charge with detailed kinetics. SAE paper 2002-01-1750,
conditions on performance and NOx emissions for 2002.
an advanced low-pilot-ignited natural gas engine. 33 Dent, J. C. Basis for the comparison of various
Int. J. Engine Res., 2004, 5(4), 329–348. DOI: 10.1243/ experimental methods for studying spray penetra-
146808704323224231. tion. SAE paper 710571, 1971.
20 Srinivasan, K. K., Krishnan, S. R., Singh, S., 34 Siebers, D. L. Scaling liquid-phase fuel penetration
Midkiff, K. C., Bell, S. R., Gong, W., Fiveland, S. in diesel sprays based on mixing-limited vaporiza-
B., and Willi, M. The advanced low pilot ignited tion. SAE paper 1999-01-0528, 1999.
natural gas engine – a combustion analysis. Trans. 35 Bell, S. R. Development of a cycle simulation for a
ASME, J. Engng Gas Turbines Power, 2006, 128, coal-fueled direct-injected, internal combustion en-
213–218. gine. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University,
21 Egolfopoulos, F. N., Holley, A. T., and Law, C. K. College Station, Texas, USA, 1986.
An assessment of the lean flammability of CH4/air 36 Kanury, A. Introduction to combustion phenom-
and C3H8/air mixtures at engine-like conditions. ena, 1975 (Gordon and Breach, New York).
Proc. Combust. Inst., 2007, 31, 3015–3022. 37 Krishnan, S. R., Srinivasan, K. K., and Midkiff, K. C.
22 Srinivasan, K. K., Krishnan, S. R., Qi, Y., Yang, H., Ignition in pilot-ignited natural gas low temperature
and Midkiff, K. C. Analysis of diesel pilot-ignited combustion: multi-zone modeling and experimen-
natural gas low-temperature combustion with hot tal results. In Proceedings of the ASME Internal
exhaust gas recirculation. Combust. Sci. Technol., Combustion Engine Division 2009 Spring Technical
2007, 179(9), 1737–1776. Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 3–6 May
23 Qi, Y., Srinivasan, K. K., Krishnan, S. R., Yang, H., 2009, paper ICES 2009-76145 (ASME International,
and Midkiff, K. C. Effect of hot exhaust gas New York).
recirculation on the performance and emissions 38 Krishnan, S. R. Experimental investigations and
of an advanced injection low pilot-ignited natural phenomenological simulation of combustion in a
low pilot-ignited natural gas engine with a focus on 54 Hountalas, D. T., Kouremenos, D. A., and Five-
advanced injection timings. Doctoral dissertation, land, S. B. Some considerations on the estimation
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA, of the heat release of DI diesel engines using
2005. modeling techniques. SAE paper 2004-01-1405,
39 Halstead, M. P., Kirsch, L. J., and Quinn, C. P. The 2004.
autoignition of hydrocarbon fuels at high tempera-
tures and pressures – fitting of a mathematical
model. Combust. Flame, 1977, 30, 45–60. APPENDIX
40 Sazhina, E. M., Sazhin, S. S., Heikal, M. R., and
Marooney, C. J. The Shell autoignition model: Notation
applications to gasoline and diesel fuels. Fuel, 1999,
78(4), 389–401. ALPING advanced (injection) low-pilot-
41 Westbrook, C. K. and Dryer, F. L. Simplified ignited natural gas
reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydro- after TDC after top dead centre
carbon fuels in flames. Combust. Sci. Technol.,
Af flame area
1981, 27, 31–43.
42 Heywood, J. B. Combustion and its modeling in Ap3 pre-exponential factor controlling
spark-ignition engines. In Proceedings of the Third fuel consumption in the propagation
International Symposium on Diagnostics and mod- cycle of the Shell model
eling of combustion in internal combustion en- BMEP brake mean effective pressure
ngines (COMODIA 1994), Yokohama, Japan, 11–14 BOI beginning of (pilot) injection
July 1994, pp. 1–15 (Engine Systems Division, Japan before TDC before top dead centre
Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo).
CA crank angle
43 Tabaczynski, R. J., Ferguson, C. R., and Radhak-
rishnan, K. A turbulent entrainment model for cb burned mass fraction exponent in the
spark-ignition engine combustion. Trans. SAE, flame area equation
1977, 86, 2414–2433; also SAE paper 770647, 1977. cfdrop model constant in the exponential
44 Tennekes, H. Simple model for the small-scale term for flame entrainment
structure of turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 1968, 11(3), cv specific heat at constant volume
669–671. Cw lean packet equivalence ratio
45 Tabaczynski, R. J., Trinker, F. H., and Shannon, B. exponent
A. S. Further refinement and validation of a tur-
bulent flame propagation model for spark-ignition EGR exhaust gas recirculation
engines. Combust. Flame, 1980, 39(2), 111–121. EOC end of combustion
46 Krishnan, S. R. Heat release analysis of dual fuel EOI end of injection
combustion in a direct injection compression-igni- EPA (US) Environmental Protection
tion engine. MS Thesis, University of Alabama, Agency
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA, 2001. EA activation energy
47 Turns, S. R. An introduction to combustion:
HC (unburned) hydrocarbon
concepts and applications, 2nd edition, 2001
(McGraw-Hill, New York). HCCI homogeneous charge compression
48 Brehob, D. D. and Newman, C. E. Monte Carlo ignition
simulation of cycle by cycle variability. SAE paper h specific enthalpy
922165, 1992. IMEP indicated mean effective pressure
49 Shen, H., Hinze, P. C., and Heywood, J. B. A study IVC intake valve closure
of cycle-to-cycle variations in SI engines using a I packet classification based on their
modified quasi-dimensional model. SAE paper
time of entry into the cylinder
961187, 1996.
50 Hill, P. G. Cyclic variations and turbulence struc-
J packet classification accounting for
ture in spark-ignition engines. Combust. Flame, radial stratification in the spray
1988, 72, 73–89. K entrainment constant
51 Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J. L. A first course in KAf flame area proportionality constant
turbulence, 1972 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massa- LTC low-temperature combustion
chusetts). L integral length scale
52 Heywood, J. B. Internal combustion engine funda- m mass of different zones
mentals, 1988, p. 143 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
ṁ reaction rate or rate of change in the
53 Woschni, G. A universally applicable equation for
the instantaneous heat transfer coefficient in the mass
internal combustion engine. Trans. SAE, 1967, 76, MW molecular weight
3065–3083; also SAE paper 670931, 1967. NOx oxides of nitrogen