CONSPIRING TO CAUSE THE ATROPHY AND DEATH OF AN OLD WOMAN

IS ONE OF THE MOST BRUTAL AND SADDENING ACTS OF MURDER THAT

ANY GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA COULD COMMIT. & YOU KNOW THAT
NO MURDERER HAS ETERNAL LIFE ABIDING WITHIN HIM. 1st John 3:15.

To confirm to you (the world) that Harper's Government has in mind

knowledge of the following Paramount report -I have written of a letter that
I received from Harper's Federal MP Laurie Hawn who wrote me the two
page letter that I received on February 16th 2011. In the letter Mr. Hawn
wrote that he is honoured to be my MP and that he is open to speak with me
regarding any Federal issue. Harper's MP wrote to appear as if through
Elections Canada that he found I had moved into his riding in the last year.

The thing is, that I have been living in my apartment for four years and not
any of the other residents in my building received such a letter from him. I
was able to gather 7 signatures from residents living on all 4 floors of my
building confirming the matter. MP Hawn wrote first that he is involved in
taking care of seniors. A dash mark was put in front of that sentence and
coma's after each other area that he wrote of. He wrote that he looks
forward to getting to know me and that if he can be of assistance in any way
that I am not to hesitate in contacting him.

I know that Prime Minister Harper's Government had him contact me using
the letter and I will never believe otherwise even if Prime Minister Harper
and Hawn were to deny it to the ends of the earth.

He wrote that he is honoured and privileged to be my MP, and indeed he is

since his Government as the other parties are fully aware that I am the
author of the revolutionary Great Final Report, which is my (other)
paramount report. I will contact him since my Mother's life is in peril yet if
his Government becomes the cause of further harm to my Mother and I then
for certain his letter is evidence of a monstrous conspiracy.

The forming of letters or documents to commit conspiracies is a real issue

as we have seen in the case of Harper's MP Bev Oda. The word “not” was
hand-written in a document that would have otherwise provided $7-million
worth of financial aid………………………………………………………………………………………….

Harper’s MP Oda said in December that she did not alter the page and now
she IS found saying that she did. The Leaders of the NDP and Bloc declared
that it is forgery. That is an indictable offence. In MP Oda first denying that
she wrote it is evidence of a guilty mind. Bev Oda claims there was
confusion and that the word "not" was suppose to be put in the document.
The liberals appear as accessories since foreign affairs critic Bob Rae said
that responsibility for her behaviour rests with the prime minister.
I see that as one way of saying that if the Conservatives commit crimes then
liberals will not ensure there is justice……………………………………………………………

It is the known duty of the Federal Government’s high offices to keep the
handling of written documents in a secure and stable fashion.

The 7 million dollar document was a matter of “yes” or “no”.

“Yes” or “no” answers are the simplest form of communicating in all

languages. - Not all answers are simple, “yes” or “no” answers.

In suggesting that the highest offices of order have become confused in

that rudiment of language is contrary to reason.

In high offices giving the message that they may give the excuse of
confusion when a critical contradiction is found in that simple of a
communication is to suggest that they may use confusion as an excuse
towards any and all critical and damning evidence.

That is why people may say Oda and the Conservatives must face a Jury.
The suggestion is to open wide the ability to commit fraud since it is to
deny the worth that critical & damning evidence has. In that the Federal
Government have put their administration of justice in disrepute.

Those that are unjust in what is little are unjust in what is much.
(Luke 16:10) - According to that principle given from God there is reason
to believe they may be into committing any crimes. In that there is reason
to believe that they may be into what they say they are against. In that
their use of the term “law abiding” is seen as a disguise and diversion.

It appears that Canada’s Justice Minister Nicholson and those that follow
him are going to burn in hell since I have proven he is unjust and that he
uses the term "law-abiding" while in what appears to be Satan stubborn
arrogance denying all I have proven in my Great Final Report.

Any that deny all I have proven need to be placed under arrest for national
mischief and fraud.

There is also the matter of Harper paying Canada’s integrity commissioner

half a million dollars to resign and to not give an account for dismissing
228 whistle-blower complaints. - Canadian’s ought to see that as horrifying.

According to Isaiah 54:17 it is written; -"No weapon that is formed against

me shall prosper; and every tongue that accuses me in judgment I shall
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD,"

This was not the case with respect to the Conservative Government and the
integrity commissioner. - Ouimet had a year to prepare a worthy account
while the Auditor General Sheila Fraser had her under investigation for a
year and yet Harper paid Ouimet half a million dollars to resign and to obey
a gag order.
Fraser's audit of the office was completed Oct. 8, 2010. The day after that
Ouimet signed her departure agreement! - When Sheila Fraser released her
report in December 2010 the report revealed that Ouimet showed bias
in evaluating the whistleblowers claims that were made to her office.
Harper's Government let the integrity commissioner continue dismissing
whistleblowers complaints to where - ALL 228 cases were dismissed.

In Harper, his Government and the integrity commissioner not giving an

account confirms they are a part of a culture set on burying and concealing
Government and system crimes and scandal.

http://www.canada.com/Fired+after+scathing+report+integrity+commissioner+expected+Parliament
+Hill/4411906/story.html#ixzz1GAx43dv6

That confirms the matter of the Government

denying my revolutionary Great Final Report

and in Paramount criminal neglect

denying the report you are reading now.

Now you see serious evidence confirming that I have been facing
a Federal Government and system that alters & falsifies documents,
and that I have been facing a Government and system that conspires
to bury & conceal crimes and scandals.

In knowing this -any other in power that rest on any claim that the
conservatives have a right to excuse themselves from all that I have to warn
of will in that be acting as accessories.

Weighing in on that is evidence serious enough that the RCMP are

considering an official criminal investigation against one of Harper’s former
staffer’s Sebastian Togneri for Blocking the publics right to Government
records through Access to information.

Before you witness all I have to tell Canadians and the World the following
are a some facts to share;

On August 24th 2010 Canada's CMA President Anne Doig spoke of the
Government not touching matters of Health care in fear of committing political
suicide! Conspiring to sacrifice the life of seniors and life of an old woman to save
political reputations is conspiracy to commit murder.

Journalist George Orwell said that Politics is schizophrenia and that it is

designed to make lies sound truthful and murder sound respectable.

On Alberta ER horror stories in an Oct 26th 2010 Edm. Journal Editorial G.

Thomson wrote; "If a (potential catastrophic collapse of our health-care
system) can't convince MLAs to hold an emergency debate in the Alberta
legislature you have to wonder what would. A volcanic eruption in Calgary? An
asteroid hitting Edmonton? Perhaps an invasion by Martians?"
"Liberals and their Leader Swann did not appear to ensure a debate and
Stelmach and his MLA's voted against it.". My Mother's life is lost in mortal peril
within the black heart of a murderous cover-up. Stelmach and Swann may act
as if there is not any reason for alarm yet there was a great Emergency and
years after it continues. Stelmach and others thought I would fail to put the
heavy evidence in order most of which is very hard to put into words.

On Alberta ER horror stories the Sun's Roy Clancy under "Emergency diagnosis
needed" wrote;"Where the life or death of our loved ones often rides on
immediate action its (startling) that Stelmach and his Government MLAs who
voted down the opposition's call for an emergency debate don't share the same
sense of urgency. It makes it look as though they care more for saving their
political skins than they do about the health of their constituents."

The Edmonton Journal wrote; "Alberta's parliamentary assistant for health

Sherman has launched a direct assault on his own Government over the ailing
medical system, saying in a leaked e-mail; -his trust in Premier Stelmach and
cabinet "is severely tarnished"- due to broken promises to fix the crisis in ER's.
You know, those places that handle matters of life and death.

Premier Stelmach's own Conservative MLA Sherman wrote in the e-mail; "Three
weeks ago, I offered the current minister (Stelmach) my resignation as the
parliamentary assistant as I can no longer support the health care decisions
made by Alberta's Health Authorities and as well as.. those made by our
government,"

Stelmach's Health Minister Gene Zwozdesky then suggested Sherman was lying
when Zwozdesky said there was no paper trail showing any resignation
request. In that is now the concern that as an accessory Sherman is (afraid) of
Stelmach, his Cabinet and Alberta Health. Denying that there was a request has
Sherman appear a part of a matter of extortion that Sherman is on the
receiving end of. The fact that Stelmach's Health Minister would think he
could talk to Stelmach's MLA Sherman in the way he did is shocking and
bizarre.

Liberal Leader Swann suggested Sherman has been (muzzled) (for months) in
stating; "He's been pushed to the wall, Sherman's (frustrations) serve as a
(condemnation) of the management of AHS." The term "frustration" is evidence
confirming fears of criminal neglect, and in denying that there was a
resignation request as the H.M. did confirms a Government conspiracy.

HORRIFIC TESTIMONY

Raj Sherman now in March 2011 has proclaimed that 250 cancer patients died
because of the system being designed in a way that equates into neglect and
that Doctors were paid to not talk about it.

Canada this is Stelmach's former parliamentary assistant accusing

Stelmach's Government and Health Authorities of a mult-million dollar
bribery scheme to cover up 250 patient deaths.
Raj stated; "I have very credible sources willing to talk. They just need to talk in
an open public investigation where they are assured they will not be punished by
government and their medical licence put at risk." None have testified since that
assurance was never given.

Stelmach's former parliamentary assistant Raj stated that Stellmachs former health
minister Iris Evans is also someone that has suppressed critical knowledge.

What people need to understand is that Raj may not have proof yet MLA
Doctor Raj Sherman has spoken of his sense from some in the system that
corruption has equated into lives becoming lost and Raj was in the position to
sense things too hard for him to put into evidentiary testimony.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2011/03/07/edmonton-raj-sherman-cancer-deaths.html

The Head of thoracic surgery Doctor Cairan McNamee alleged in a law suit
against Alberta's Regional Health Authorities that when he spoke out to Alberta's
Conservative Government on the matter of surgery wait times that the
Government and Alberta's Regional Health Authorities told him that his advocacy
would no longer be tolerated and that he needed emergency psychiatric
treatment. McNamee now works in a Boston Hospital and teaches in Harvard.

Capital Health denied the allegations and yet we know that when Stelmach's
MLA Dr. Raj Sherman spoke out on that matter that Stelmach's Government and
Health Authorites sought to have MLA Raj Sherman appear as if he was in need
of psychiatric treatment.

The world ought to see it as extremely disturbing that there is evidence that
Stelmach's Government and Alberta's Health authorities have conspired to have
a parliamentary assistant and Head of surgery appear mental.

Stelmach's Health President Ducket has shown the arrogant and careless way
Stelmach's Government really is within the walls of the Legislature when he used
the excuse that he was eating a cookie to deny the media's call for answers!

On the matter of cancer patients now you see serious evidence that
Alberta's Government & Health system have conspired to bury and
conceal neglect causing deep suffering & death and that Alberta's
Government and Alberta's Health Authorities conspire to have any
that give evidence of such neglect appear mental.

With that in mind I have proven in the following report that we have a
system that thinks it is able to escape criminal charges while it works
to abduct seniors and in murderous fraud experiments on them.
http://elderadvocates.ca/senior-arrested-and-detained-without-cause/

On the internet Senator Nancy Schaefer has written of children in America

taken to other Countries through the Government and placed in foster care.
Senator Schaefer who has advocated for hundreds of cases has written of
parents having to jump through every hoop known to man in order to have their
loved-one returned to them!".
In one case the Senator stated; -"The Mother was so traumatized with shock
(-from being separated from her loved one-) that she has not recovered!".

The Government as a source of help not existing is seen in the case of

renowned pathologist Dr. Charles Smith. The corrupt Doctor testified that
Mullins-Johnson had sodomized and killed a four-year-old. Experts concluded
the evidence points to natural causes. Experts concluded Smith had made
(major) errors in 13 trials of which resulted in criminal convictions, wherein
Smith had determined the cause of death was murder or criminally suspicious.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons labelled Doctor Smith as disgraceful and
dishonourable. Smith pleading no contest to their charges. Mullins stated;
"His actions were no less than perjury and obstruction, and for the Justice
Minister and his Office to step aside now and not take action against this
man is.. unconstitutional and illegal."

The Senator wrote that she has witnessed -ruthless behaviour from (((- social
workers-))) (((-investigators-))), (((-lawyers, judges-))), (((-therapists-))) and
others working for the Government that "pick-up" the loved-ones..

The Senator wrote that; "Child Protective Services is -a "protected Empire"-

built on taking and separating families!"

The Senator wrote that the "natural guardian" lose their loved one -because
they do not have the money for a lawyer and do not know how to fight the
system- -The Senator wrote that the cases are heart-wrenching and that within
families the Father and/or Mother does not know where their own daughter or
son is and that the daughter or son have horrifically not seen their Father
and/or Mother in years!.

Senator Nancy Schaefer wrote that; "No longer is judgment based on what
the loved-one needs or child needs or who they want to be with") but based on
some adult or bureaucrat who makes the decisions ((-"based often on hearsay"-
)) or ((-"insufficient evidence"-)) of ((-"so-called abuse"-)) ((-"that the system
uses"-)) to take the loved-one or child. ("abduct")

Senator Nancy Schaefer wrote; ((-"The system cannot be trusted."-))

((-"It does not serve the people."-)) ((-"It obliterates families"-)) and children
((-"simply because it has the power to do so!"-))

All of those very serious words that the Senator Nancy Schaefer wrote serve
as a fitting introduction to my following Paramount report.

I spoke to a Dr.Judith G. Janzen on the phone for 3 hours and 5 minutes on Dec
7th 2010. Dr. Janzen told me that she believes the Government and system MK
ULTRA MC & MONARCH experiments are still being done on children in Canada
for sex-slavery. Janzen told me that Doctors and others work with people in
power within our Government so that there are not too many deaths against
children while they are turning children into sex slaves.

Dr. Janzen told me that in doing that to children that they also of course do
not care that they experiment with and destroy the lives of seniors.
THE FOLLOWING IS MY REPORT OF GOVERNMENT AND SYSTEM
CRIMES THAT ARE ALL A PART OF A MURDEROUS CONSPIRACY
AGAINST MY ELDERLY MOTHER'S LIFE. THE REPORT IS
PARAMOUNT AND WILL ALSO PROVE A COVER-UP OF CRIMES
AGAINST OTHER SENIORS.

Opposition leaders office bonjour -

I speak; "Hi there.. Yes! I'm just calling to confirm that Michael Ignatieff
received the new (evidence) disc that I sent?"

Iggy's Office; "Yes you sent quite a package there, we got all of that!..thank you"

THAT CONFIRMS TO CANADA AND THE WORLD THAT THEY DID RECEIVE
ALL THAT YOU WILL WITNESS IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT.

The following is a part of one the transcribed phone-calls with Ignatieff's

advisor's Office..

I speak; ""You know we are dealing with murderous scandals here""

-(Sebastian assistant for Ignatieff's advisor Ujjal Dosanjh) speaks; "Thanks

we'll continue going through this as we can and try to confirm other material
that gets sent our way and try to see what we can do with this."

WHAT YOU HAVE READ IS REAL! IT IS NOT A LIE, NOT A DELUSION, NOT ANY
FORM OF DEFAMATION, BUT REAL!!!

CANADA'S PPSC CONSPIRING TO BURY GOV'T CRIMES

The following is part of a phone conversation that I (Shawn G. Cullen) had with
Louis D. of The Federal Ombudsmans Office for victims of crime; This phone
transcription confirms that the PPSC Canada's Federal Agency in place to
investigate our nation's MP's is corrupt.
PARAMOUNT 2010 PHONE CALL

I speak; "A Personal Directive is a legal document that gives one the Right to
govern over the welfare of another and so there is an assignment in it, and they
committed criminal fraud in subverting that Directive, and then they used
everything in their power to cover it up and bury it and so a person was taken
against their will and institutionalized, and an illegal guardianship application
was set into motion, and so the Court system was also used fraudulently..and
so the person is in danger and there is also an eggshell matter, and so the
persons life is in great danger"

Louis D. speaks; "So your concern is if I understand correctly, that..the

Provincial government has colluded with agencies within the provincial
government to put an elderly woman in some kind of facility against her will
and seems to have made some kind of application where they have taken over
wardship for this particular person?"

I speak; "That's for sure, Yah!..They did an unjustified diagnosis and testing,
and failed to heed warnings, and they caused psychiatric injury, and now they
are trying to dissolve themselves of blame by acting like it ,"

Louis D. speaks; "Ok, and you feel you have evidence that the Federal
government is aiding and abetting this through some kind of a cover-up?"I
speak; "Sure they are, sure they are, because they have all the evidence files,
and the..files prove it all, and they are afraid because they were slow in the
investigation and so because there is evidence of criminal neglect and that
they didn't respond correctly, now they're afraid that they look.,"

Louis D. speaks; "Right,..and you have evidence you say that the woman was
put in an institution.. that It was done illegally, and you are talking you know
of an illegal cover-up. You're talking criminal activities here..That would be
under the Public Prosecution Service of Canada"

I speak; "I called them and they said that they don't investigate government
crimes. -Don't you find that strange?"

Louis D. speaks; "The Public Prosecution Service of Canada, these are the
individuals who are mandated to deal with information in wrong doings
involving the Federal government under Federal Acts."

I speak; "I called them..and tried to find out who I get to investigate and they
said they'd call me back and they didn't AND SO SOMEBODY IS IN BED WITH
THEM. They (The Fed Govt) have serious evidence and they are hiding it from
the public, so we can actually say that it is a matter of National Security!"

Louis D. speaks; "Their mandate is to prosecute criminal offenses under

Federal jurisdiction, that is the role of their agency"
I speak; "Well someone obviously has to investigate the Federal Government
when they are hiding critical and life saving evidence and damning evidence
against Stelmachs Government!"

Louis D Directed me to the Crown Prosecutors Office in Edmonton yet in light of

the huge National scandal that I believe this turned into I have not been able to
trust any. I concluded that finishing a report is all I have in order to be able to
have any secure way of sharing evidence. Perhaps Harper fired his Ombudsman
because he was afraid that I would consider talking with that office and that
someone would hear what I had to say. - What you have just read is real ! ! !

Paramount Public Statement & Phone Recording.

December 2009 Canada's Medical Association President Anne Doig gave a

speech on national television warning that the Government denies any
spoken word against the health-care system while wrapping itself in the
Canadian flag.

On that day CMA President Anne Doig warned that if the Government is too
frightened to act for patients in danger then people must hold the Government
accountable..

CMA President Anne Doig knows I am working on that to save my Mother. I

wrote warning Doig and her legal firm that I have paramount health crimes to
prove against the Government. CMA President Anne Doig's legal Director Jean
Nelson said to me over the phone; "I do appreciate Shawn the evidence in
your voice and in your writings that you are a person of strong convictions
and so its frustrating for you." -

CMA President Anne Doig's legal Director Jean Nelson also said the scandal
"sounds like a hydra full of tentacles"

The murderous crimes happening to my Mom Gale and the other scandal that you
will read of against a number of seniors that I have evidence of is a conspiracy
wherein many are working as organized crime in the system to hide.

A reflection of the national reality of people in the system covering for each
other was seen in the Air India matter.

On June 20th 2010 towards the 1985 bombing of Canadians Mark Freiman the
lead Counsel for the Commission of Inquiry spoke of "the Government
pretending everything was fine when it was not"

Commissioner John Major stated; "We know various government agencies and
institutions did not fulfill their (critical and vital) responsibilities." "What we
found (in our inquiry) was...surprising and disturbing" Major stated that after
the bombing; "The Government spoke with one voice and painted (a false)
picture" A. Kapoor testified of the Government holding to false claims of a so-
called right to secrecy and he said that the claims were done in secret "through
a judge" with none to challenge the claims.
Before you read of what murderous crimes are happening against Gale the
following will tell you a little of (the other) Health scandal that I have written
of that is being done to seniors; That scandal is a matter of turning seniors into
Alzheimer's and Dementia victims. The truth is that the Health systems may
cause pseudo-dementia to become degenerative !!!!!!!!!!!!!.

Depression slows the brains functions and heavy depression causes level 3
subcortical damage in the brain. Heavy depression increases plaques and
tangles in the brain (#4-kind) Chronic stress increases deadly cortisol hormone
which accelerates death in the frontal lobe and in the cerebellum, basil
ganglia. Chronic stress increases deadly cortisol hormone that especially
accelerates death in the hippocampus where memory is stored!

Isolation, Institutionalizing, abuse, neglect and experimenting using drugs

may set the minds of seniors on a course of brain aging degeneration. For
certain (any) of these crimes may induce dementia.

Contrary to what people know of Alzheimer's it is one of the most horrifying

ways of dying because it is to become lost again and again in new ways with
the fear that it is a black curse separating them from love and hope. The
isolating and drugs they give is to them like fear of Psychotic Doctors and
nurses hiding them deeper and deeper within running drain-pipes. It is one of
the most terrifying ways of dying since it causes the aging senior to believe (&
feel) that their (spirit) is dying.

Dr. James Whitehouse a world leader in the Alzheimer's field who was seen on
the Oprah Show warned that the Alzheimer's label is being used to (dissolve)
Governments, health systems and Doctors of blame for malpractice causing
harm and the degeneration & deterioration to the minds of seniors.

Dr. James Whitehouse warned that the Alzheimer's field has distorted the truth
of Alzheimer's & Dementia to use the terms as labels to build & feed what is a
multi-billion-dollar clinical empire.

On the money side of it Kevin Trudeau who has been seen on National
Television saying that Governments conspire to deny natural ways of healing
plaque illnesses so that it will continue gaining billions from drugs that only
work to feign help and that kill.

Internationally renowned Dr. Grace E. Jackson also wrote of Drug-Induced

Dementia: under the title "A Perfect Crime" that presents scientific and
epidemiological evidence which again confirms the matter.

On May 9th 2010 Scott Laurie of CTV News aired the matter of there being
24,000 cases of (healthcare system) tragedies that have been (buried and not
investigated.) Why are reputations being put before lives in mortal peril? In
that the Government appears to be guilty of widespread criminal neglect and
of conspiring to hide that there may be many possible negligent homicides.
The following story of my Mother Gale may appear hard to read yet the
matter is simple.

In the case of my elderly Mother the matter is that of causing murderous

psychiatric injury through illegal institutionalizing.

It is the matter of denying an uncommon eggshell fear warning that my Mother

is not to have strangers nursing and of Personal Directive Rights.
The uncommon fear of facility care is based on health system abuse and death
of her own Mother. : Lord Parker C.J. –Smith vs. Leech Brian & Co.(1962)2 QB
405---Kennedy J ,in Dulieu vs. White & sons.-

After having been caught not hitting the brake when rights were proclaimed
the facility without my knowledge and consent went on to do a secret test
and wrote a false diagnosis to forge a false account for damage they did and
for heavy harm they were causing, and so in a conspiracy of fraud & torture
went on in a murderous plan to open pseudo-dementia to risk of degeneration.

The system sure as hell know that it cannot replace sole or unique care nor
replace a family bond. Quod medicina aliis, aliis est acre venenum; = What is
medicine to some is bitter poison to others -! ! !

LOST

The Government have done much to cause great confusion so the Media and
Public would never see what they did and are doing.

If you keep in mind the Paramount telephone recording that you read then
you will not lose sight.

In the 2010 article on abuses to rights by Brent McGiillis entitled; "Alberta's

Rampant Government Corruption and the Death of Democracy" McGiillis wrote;
"The corruption runs so high and so deep that who do the whistle blowers go
to? (The cops?)..(The Media?) (HAH !!!) (Who would tell their story?")
They isolated my ill elderly Mother

and shut me out

in a brutal conspiracy to re-write reality

And so in a murderous conspiracy they did indeed commit fraud, criminal

isolation, illegal banning and set course to prevail in subverting my Mother's life
and will using an illegal guardianship request and corrupt court judge to abduct
and traffic my Mother into the care of an institution and strangers. The
Stelmach government spent 7 months (a murderous & brutal amount of time)
feigning an investigation against its own health system. His Government did
that to disguise that it was acting as an accessory to the illegal plan and then
Stelmach's MLAs & PPC Agency wrote me an illogical & scrambled report to
whitewash their investigation.

A (Provincial Conservative funded) legal aid lawyer that legal aid hired to do a
legal opinion said that evidence does not matter! - I asked how he could say
that when he didn't see my evidence and I reminded him that a good lawyer
searches for a point of law to defend a case.

When I said I was going to the Federal Government the legal aid lawyer said
“the Federal Politicians do not know anything and are corrupt,” When he
said that it was as if it was to excuse himself of shared guilt that he had while
hiding that he was hiding that the Government and system were using him to
feign that I was receiving legal aid.

As the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth before God I am telling
you the Media and Public that the legal aid lawyer for certain said those things
to me !!!

The lawyer wrote that my having contact with my Mother would appear to
benefit her (directly) and in his opinion to legal aid he strongly recommended
that I get a lawyer to have contact with my Mother, yet he did not write
recommending that I receive a lawyer for my appeal.

The lawyer then on the matter of the facility holding my Mother wrote
that I ought to have sought to catch more flies with honey, as if It was my duty
to act sweet in order to save my Mother and so in madness suggested
that I did not have the right to show that I was defending rights.

In his legal opinion to legal aid the lawyer wrote (of flies & honey)
contrary to my telling him that the facility was neglecting my warnings
of my Mother having uncommon nursing care fears,

Why did the legal aid lawyer write that if he was not being used by the
Government to commit fraud? In his legal opinion for the provincially
funded legal aid he was writing fiction against all I was telling him.
The lawyer also oddly made the suggestion that I did not have the right to show
I was defending rights contrary to my warning him that the facility's Agency
admitted in writing that I caught their facility staff in abusive and neglectful
practices. - I suspect they admitted in fear that I had recordings proving it.

Why did the legal aid lawyer write that if he was not being used by the
Government to commit fraud? In his legal opinion for the provincially
funded legal aid he was writing fiction against all I was telling him.

The lawyer also oddly made the suggestion that I did not have the right to show
I was defending rights contrary to my warning him that I had a video confirming
that the facility staff had conspired to lie in saying that I was troubling them.

Why did the legal aid lawyer write that if he was not being used by the
Government to commit fraud? In his legal opinion for the provincially
funded legal aid he was writing fiction against all I was telling him.

What is also damning is that the lawyer wrote;

(That an inquiry into the system would divert attention away

from my need to reach my Mother for the serving of
her comfort & possible recovery.)

Legal aid did not give me a lawyer to ensure that I was able
to provide that critical comfort & possible saving of my
Mother from irreversible harm and death!

The lawyer wrote that my critical warnings were given little notice or worse
insultingly dismissed by the Government and/or agency & its facility because
my care of my Mother being open to interpretation, YET the lawyer had to
know that my care was not open to any lawful interpretation, since I spoke to
him of powerful recordings that had proven none had any right laying any onus
on me.

Keep in mind that I was serving my Mothers care needs in the facility free of
any security or nursing supervision each day.

I told the lawyer I had recordings and documents proving that freedom I was given.

What also weighs in is that my mother was not held under any act or warrant.

Another key record that the Government, system and lawyer have buried and
concealed is that one of the facilities registered nurses named Chris said to me
that he did not have any bad experience with me. I have the December 20th
2006 recording and transcription proving that.

The first time that they unlawfully isolated my Mother a recording revealed
my Mother later saying to me in heart wrenching tears and fear; "I haven't
seen you for so long" –
 My Mother was suffering injury from the facility' acting as if she would assume
to have love for the staff while it was denying and subverting that I am her son.

Sick !

In righteous anger and as a righteous mock to the facility she spoke out saying
to me; "I want you, I love (you)"

To proclaim her complete rejection of the system and her full belief
in my knowledge of her she cried out in profoundly saddening tears saying;
"I'm not gonna go to nothing for you to love me and help me and I know
that's what it is!"

When I asked her if she felt she was being institutionalized she then said in
traumatizing fear; "Yah that's what it is!"

It is wicked criminal fraud and propaganda to act as if any

need greater evidence than all these messages seen in
my elderly Mother's own words!
What the Politicians and system have done and are doing is nothing short of life
swallowing physical, emotional and mental torture. November 27th 2009
Professors Itai Sneh & Melissa Ptacek proclaimed that indeed torture can be to
the mind and emotions. It is sad that I feel I must record that Professors have
said that to have people understand the matter.

There was and is also a June 6th 2007 fax that is truly key since it proves that
in 2005 my Mother did communicate her full trust in my acting as her power of
attorney and Agent for all her health needs.

The key fax also confirms my Mothers eggshell fear of institutions & facility care!

eggshell
matter
The facility recordings from the facility 1 year later in 2006 prove that MY
Mother was [[[-only-]]] communicating with me in the facility and prove my
unique ability to understand my Mother and to reach her,

The facility recordings from the facility 1 year later in 2006 prove also that my
Mother was in shock and voiceless when the staff and others were nursing her
and that they were rupturing her eggshell vulnerability, Also, Cum tacent
clamant; = when they remain silent they cry out.

The evidence reveals

that the Government and system

is guilty of murderous fraud.

The Government would be using mind control on the public and media to act as
if all of this that I am telling of is not sky-high damning evidence against it.

Why did the provincially funded legal aid lawyer not put these facts together
that show the system committing conspiracy to commit murder? I have had to
prove all things and even have had to pick bottles and cans out of the garbage
bins to have money to prepare evidence. I also spent hundreds of dollars on
storage and safety deposit boxes in fear that the Government would try to
somehow subvert & steal the evidence I have and have been preparing.

The lawyer wrote that my critical warnings were given little notice or worse
insultingly dismissed by the agency and/or its facility and so he had to have
known that such bias would equate into criminal neglect.

The lawyer wrote that my critical warnings were given little notice or worse
insultingly dismissed by the agency and/or its facility and so he had to have
seen the system's guardianship challenge against my Mother's Personal Directive
as illegal since the system did not have the right saying my Mother was a
dependent adult in criminal neglect nor while knowing from day one I was
warning that they were causing shocking fear and psychiatric injury.

The lawyer James Culkin also had to have seen it as suspect that Caritas did
not apply to the courts until after holding my mother for 10 months.

The matter of the Directive was simple. The system was violating page 2 of the
Personal Directive since there was evidence of my Mother communicating and
so I was to be given all authority to act as her agent, and I was to have all
authority to act as her agent or legal steward if at any time she was not able to
communicate after the health system did any harm to her.
The strange reasoning failures of the lawyer that I have written of must be seen
as critical & damning evidence that the opinion was written for my adversaries,
(Stelmach's Gov't & health system.) I wrote to that lawyer James Culkin -telling
him that it does appear that he wrote it for my adversaries.

On March 26th 2008 I mailed a 1 page fax to tell legal aid

that in denying my right to a lawyer they were acting
as accessories to whitewashing a health scandal.

On April 7th 2008 I filed a motion at Edmonton's Courthouse to order legal

aid to give me a lawyer. The panel of 3 judges were justice jean Cote,
justice jack Watson, and justice Frans Slatter.

THE PANEL WROTE

In a pending Civil appeal the appellant seeks a lawyer from legal aid and
funding for 1/3rd of the bill to release the appeal books from transcript
management. After reading what he wrote for this motion he gave oral
testimony in person.

He also handed in a letter from a Doctor and (another document). The focus of
his argument was largely on the merits of his appeal. We asked Mr.Cullen
whether he knew of any legal authority which would give us such power to
make such an order, a statute, regulation or previous court decision. He said he
did not and simply invoked justice on his position. We know of no legal
authority to grant him the funds and a lawyer. The motion is denied which we
heard on May 15th 2008".

Willful Blindness
 The ruling was and is murderous fraud.
Before I give host to the murderous matter
the following are a few records worth having in mind;

Oct 2009 Edmonton lawyer Beresh proclaimed his fear that Stelmach commits
political interference using Edmonton's court system. CBC

On march 29th 2010 before a commons committee on crime in Edmonton MP

Joe Comartin asked if Alberta Judges, Prosecutors and Police are into
organized crime and Police Chief Hanson stated; "The answer to that is yes"

On 2010 Brent McGiillis wrote an article entitled; "Alberta's Rampant

Government Corruption and the Death of Democracy" McGiillis wrote; "Even the
justice system..is a complete disgrace to a free and open democracy."

McGiillis wrote; "You have to ask yourself exactly why there's never been any
investigations of MLA's here in Alberta as long as anyone can remember".

THE DELUDING COURT PANEL

The Court Panel were deluding in writing that I was invoking Justice on a
position since they had to know that the (video evidence) and (Doctors letter)
called them to serve a lawyer and funds for the appeal to save my Mother and
to serve a lawyer to order a trial against the system.

The Court Panel also deluded in writing that I was in need of a statute or
regulation since I gave them a copy of my Mother's Personal Directive
containing why I was to have full legal authority to act as the sentry and
steward of my Mother's will and wishes.

The recordings prove that my Mother and I share a strong family bond as seen
in my Mother's words and emotions and the recordings reveal that my Mother
was confiding ONLY in me, and that my Mother cried out ONLY for me, and that
my Mother was communicating ONLY with me.

That was and is critical since that reveals that my Mother gave the message
that my care of her is [-unquestionably the best-], [-incomparable-] or [-the
sole choice!-] - Of course I know that the latter is the truth.

WILL & WISHES

Page 2 of the Personal Directive stated that if my Mother is in a persistent vegetative state
and Health Practitioners did commit any form of abuse or critical neglect to her then I
was to have the right to choose for my Mother above all others. Weighing in on that is the
matter that my Mother was not in a persistent vegetative state (as the video recordings
prove). (-In light of these records the 3 judges had to know that I did not need any 'statute
to cite' since the legal P.D. gave the legal instruction-) The 3 judges named the P.D. in
their written ruling "another document". They did that to bury and conceal from the
Media and Public that the P.D. was and is key to proving the Government and system is
guilty of murderous fraud.
THE FOLLOWING IS THE DOCTORS LETTER

Doctors Letter;

"I can confirm that especially on the audio tapes that it is evident that your
Mother was clearly expressing her desire to be taken from the nursing facility
and to be returned home to your care",

"and I also note that on direct questioning by yourself that she confirmed that
she had given you Power of Attorney, and that it was her desire to have you act
on behalf of all matters, including nursing care"" Her vocal expressions during
the audio-taped telephone calls in 2005 while discussing the issue of your
having Power of Attorney also reflected a coherent pattern of speech"

"Normal tracking of the content of conversation and her voice intonation was
congruent with topics of discussion, suggesting adequate reality contact and
lucid mental functioning at the moments of those recordings"

"What I can say is that there was nothing evident on any of the audio nor video
clips to suggest any lack of understanding or reality contact sufficient to
render her incompetent to give her consent or authorization for you to act
as her Power of Attorney"

"It is my understanding that the onus is on those (Stelmach's Government and

Alberta's Health System) who wish to challenge the legally executed
authorization of Power of Attorney to demonstrate that she was not mentally
competent at the time of assignment and there is clearly nothing that I can
detect in any of these recordings to provide any support for that position"

"On both the audio tape segments as well as on the subsequent video tape
segments it is also my Professional observation that the interactions between
yourself and your Mother were 'consistently' very positive and there is
("obvious") love and affection expressed in both directions"

"She also very clearly stated on multiple occasions she loved you, that she
wished for you to take her home, and the verbal and non-verbal communication
cues were very consistent and indicative of a very strong level of emotional
bonding and overall positive relationship"

"Based upon the audio and video recordings and the collateral information you
have related to me in the past...and in view of the strong affection and
bonding I would strongly suspect that regular contact with your Mother may
have a significant beneficial impact on her emotional status"

"It is also well recognized in the field of psycho-geriatrics that depression may
continue harming brain functions and that provision of positive supportive
family contact is an "extremely" important factor in reducing the severity of
the functional deficits arising from depression and brain disfunction"
My Mother and I were convalescing from an illness before the scandal began
and the last thing she was in need of was to become a victim of system
abduction, experimentation and a conspiracy to illegally institutionalizing her.

The following is the last part of the Forensic Psychologist's letter.

"To the extent that there was a strong emotional bond between yourself and
your Mother barring contact between you may well have been a trigger (
That the system pulled) for grief & feelings of loss that added to her
depression & emotional distress causing additional compromising of her
mental functioning"

This adds a rain-cloud to the thunder-shower of damning evidence confirming

the horror health scandal the Government & system have been committing
against my Mother and I. The Doctor in fear of testifying against the entire
system turned yellow and sought to twist his way out of it. I had the College of
Psychologists investigate him. Their Director wrote a whitewashing report. I
Judged her report and proved it was fraud and accused her of fraud, I gave my
report to their appeal Board and they spent 40 days trying to excuse what I
proved against their Director. They wrote a report to me that utterly failed to
account for what I proved against their Director, then I faxed telling them that
they also were guilty of fraud. I have a file proving it all!

I believe that white-washing the sudden case of yellow was to act as an

accomplice to the system's crimes. The College of Psychologist's is another
principality of the Government. Within my PDF file on the matter you will be
eye-witnesses that I have proven that Alberta's College of Psychologists of
Alberta is guilty of conspiracy and of many crimes. The Government is hiding
much Canada. - Its now (2011) and I am sharing Paramount things with you all!

The Court panel made up of justice jean Cote, justice jack Watson, and justice
Frans Slatter wrote that I gave them a Doctors letter and [[AANNOOTTHHEERR DDOOCCUUM NTT]].
MEEN
That "other document" that the 3 fraudulent judges did not name was
[The Personal Directive.] The panel of judges did not name it the P.D.
bbeeccaauussee tthheeyy w
waanntteedd ttoo m
miisslleeaadd tthhee ppuubblliicc aaw
waayy ffrroom
m sseeeeiinngg tthhee ffaaccttss.. Writing
("Another Document") was to suppress the evidence of the Personal Directive

The 3 deluding judges also acted as if I did not cite a thing in order to receive
funding and yet I did cite Norman Lavoie vs. Penelope Tew 2003 ABCA 204 a
ruling of a Justice R Berger ordering legal aid to provide financial assistance.

A lawyer that I spoke to C.Q. Riddoch wrote to me in June of 2007 saying that
such a case is not in her legal expertise. In the letter she did write as a note to
legal aid; "Mr.Cullen left a voice mail message for me on or about May 31st
2007 stating that his Mother has been isolated from him for many months. He
also played an audio recording of himself & his Mother. Due to the audio
recording I could only hear a few words from Mr. Cullen and that his Mother
was crying. It appeared from the few words that I could discern from Mr. Cullen
and the tone of his Mother's voice that she missed him a great deal."
 The 3 judges that set course to commit fraud against the Legal will
denied reality to turn a blind-eye against the Lawyer's comment.

Premier Stelmach & Shiela Weatherill and his criminal government put their
health superboard in place in May of 2008 to replace its 9 regional health
authorities. They did that to control things in fear of crimes they know have
proven against them, the Caritas Health Group, the Alberta Hospital and
Misericordia Hospital.

In December 2009 Wendy McDonald the President of the Association for Community
Living stated; that Premier Ed Stelmach's Government "is going after the most
vulnerable people in Alberta and their families" Wendy also stated; "We should be
celebrating (the holidays) and enjoying family rather than living in fear!"

The SUN media reported the matter of former Auditor General Fred Dunn
slamming Stelmach's Government for 18 million dollars, in pay, severance
packages and bonuses being given to senior executives working for Alberta's
Health authorities. Sheila Weatherill the Chair received 1.5 million.As far as I
see it this is blood money to hide what they did and are doing to my Mother.
Dunn also marked the fact that they even used the wrong contracts for
severance packages and failed to provide him with documentation to support
their severance pay calculations.
Stelmach sought to muzzle Former Auditor General Fred Dunn (after he spoke
out for seniors.) Doctors also voiced concern over allegations that Stelmach and
his new health board gagged Onocologists from speaking out for cancer
patients. (Calgary Herald) On March 23rd 2010 Alta Primetime John Church
suggested that Stelmach's new health superboard is designed to gag Doctors
and healthcare workers in fear that they may speak out for patients in
possible danger. Manipulation was also seen when David Harrigan from the
United Nurses of Alberta said that Stelmach's health board had 3 days of closed
door meetings and that AHS *then pretended that the meetings were just
beginning. Alta P.T.

In fear of my evidence of experimentation on dementia patients at the Alberta

Hospital and aafftteerr w
whhaatt tthheeyy ddiidd ttoo m
myy M
Mootthheerr Stelmachs Government sought
to have it appear as if they do not institutionalize people against their will …

Three weeks after the news of the plan to close beds at the Alberta Hospital
the Regional Director of Mental Health Services Patrick White quit his position.

NDP leader Brian Mason stated; "The government has been deceptive"
Stelmach's Seniors Minister M. Jablonski stated; "We are looking at building far
more beds in the community and that's because people want to stay in their
homes" - (Those words are a complete contradiction to the murderous crimes
of institutionalizing that they did and are doing to my Mother.)

On September 25th 2009 the President of the Alberta Medical Association Noel
Grisdale warned physicians to be vigilant towards the way Stelmach
was using the AMA since it was being used to do a review of healthcare in only
75 short days -and so did appear to be a part of a plot to confuse corrupt
healthcare decisions Stelmach made.

Grisdale also gave the warning of secrecy in Stelmach's Government and

health system !!!

From April's 2010 survey only 18% of physicians and only 41% of nurses and
other health servants at Stelmach's & Shiela Weatherill's Alberta Health
superboard say they are proud to work for Alta health services. The survey was
sent to 100, 000 staff and volunteers.

A full 68% of Doctors reported distrust and lack of confidence in the upper
management of Alberta Health’s Superboard that Stelmach and Shiela
Weatherill put together.

56% of Doctors reported that Alberta Health’s Superboard managers didn't

act consistently nor do as they said they would

One wrote under the April 7 2010 Ed. Journal report; "I worked for Alta health
services..A few of my colleagues were scared to fill out the survey because they
feared retribution should they be linked to the comments. (I don't feel I can trust
my immediate supervisors nor those at the top)."
TWO YEARS AFTER THE SCANDAL BEGAN AGAINST MY MOTHER THE FOLLOWING
WAS BEING SAID;

Sound-off comments on Stelmach firing Boutilier 07 18 2009 by Don Braid ;

July 19th 2009 11:47 - Jaded wrote; - "How in the world did a comment on the
(inadequacies of seniors facilities) (a true fact) set off the expulsion of an MLA?
Talk about using dynamite to kill a fly ...Even Jesus had a trial!".

Stelmach and his system used dynamite to quiet Boutilier since the last
thing Stelmach wanted was any saying a thing against seniors facilities.
Stelmach had criminal fear that the MLA was giving volume to my voice that
his Government was working to bury and conceal.

July 20 2009 12:08 - Did not vote PC wrote; - ".What are they brewing? Why do
they want everyone who knows anything silenced?"

What they have done and are doing to my Mother (is what this is all about)

As I said I have evidence of another scandal

that the Government and system have been hiding.

The criminal matter is fraud, experimentation, abuse and neglect to seniors at

Alberta's Hospital. This is another reason why the system have been burying and
concealing the murderous fraud being done to my Mother. Being very sensitive
to any loss to my Mother's well-being in 2005 I called Health Services to have
them give her a physical in order to see that there was not any lack of wellness
to my Mother's health that was weakening her memory. I thought it was strange
that they said they only had room in the vehicle for my Mother. They said they
were taking her to the Glenrose and yet they lied and took her to Alberta
Hospital. It was not a physical, it was an abduction. I had to fight to free her
from the clinical grip of the facility. In that time seniors were telling me they
were in peril there. They testified and let me record their testimony.
 I was not able to record very much

Yet the following is part of the recording transcriptions.

I SPEAK -"There can't be any risk taking and experimentation."

ELDERLY PATIENT LEEMAN SPEAKS; "Exactly but that's not the way the games
played. Notice when we're all sitting around the table there's no happy faces
around there?"

I SPEAK; "Gale said that this is the last place she wants to be!"

LEEMAN SPEAKS; "And it's one hundred percent true..St Albert is not that far,
but i'm scared, I don't dare, I feel that if I made a run for it that they'd catch
me!"

I SPEAK; "Cause you feel this place is a prison, is that why?"

LEEMAN SPEAKS; "Oh you betcha, i've said that more than once, this is not a
hospital, it's a prison."

I SPEAK -"My God, yeah well something's got to be done, the way this Hospital
is run is a wolf in sheep clothing."

I SPEAK; "So you feel they sent you here to..make money, I can't believe you
are saying that to me that's wild"

ELDERLY TED SPEAKS; "We're hooked in here, we're set up in here and we cant
get out..its not anything that is good, is bad, its corrupt..there's something
thats screwed up that's not right"

I SPEAK; "What do you mean its screwed up?"

TED SPEAKS; "Well by whatever they are trying to do, I don't know something is
phoney and the (so-called) Doctor here doesn’t seem to want to respond
either".

In the case of the Canada New Brunswick citing, according to

the Estate of Sterling- Marquis vs. Westin 134 NBR(2), the
Judge refused to admit the will of an 81 year old woman to
probate. The New Brunswick Court of Appeal did admit the
will to probate.

After two heart attacks four days apart, the old woman
summoned her lawyer and best friend to prepare a will.
Medical witnesses who did not see her but who testified from
the medical records, felt she could not have been competent.
Mr. Westin, the closest living blood relative to the old
women, named on her will, questioned the old woman’s
testamentary capacity.
Following a hearing, the lower court Judge concluded that
she did not have testamentary capacity and refused to admit
the will. There was also the medical report that the old
woman Mrs. Sterling had deteriorated in her condition before
she voiced her instruction.

Lay witnesses who saw the 81 year old woman testified that
the old woman was competent.

It was based on that lower court ruling that 5 Beneficiaries

appealed.

The New Brunswick Court of Appeal reversed the lower Courts

ruling and admitted the old woman's will and wishes based on
the virtue of the lay witnesses observations who testified
that she comprehended sufficiently.

The appeal Court Judge ruled that a Judgment may be formed

by a layman of good sense with as much authority as of a
Doctor, the weight given touching the question of capacity
depending upon the extent of the observations made by the
lay witness.

Other Transcriptions;

ELDERLY LEEMAN SPEAKS; "..they get mad at that too?"

I SPEAK; "Mad at what, when you have to go to the washroom?"

LEEMAN SPEAKS; "Well because they have to clean you..when you got to go
you got to go!"

I SPEAK; "Right but not around here!"

GALE SPEAKS; "they treat you badly!"

I SPEAK; "They do, ok!"I SPEAK; "This is not a hospital, this is a prison!"

ELDERLY LEEMAN SPEAKS; "I found it very interesting talking to you because
I used those same words when I found what was going on in here..Its
comforting to know someone has the same view!..I appreciate that more
than you'll ever know!"

I SPEAK; "You said they force you to eat your food..whether you are full or
not?"

GALE SPEAKS; "That's right, and that's how people get sick.."

COMMUNICATION FROM ANOTHER DAY

GALE SPEAKS; "They want me to be crazy"

I SPEAK; "You put the tray on the floor to make yourself look crazy so they
won't hurt you?" GALE SPEAKS; "Yeah, yeah that's right!"
 The murderous psychotic system may claim that many of the patients at Alberta's
Hospital are in a vegetative state and have no hope of regaining consciousness.
That is an excuse to experiment, abuse and neglect the seniors.

People that do not understand that Alzheimer’s patients live in unimaginable fear
do not understand the illness.

We know there are those in the system that do not treasure nor respect reports
as that of Mary Fraas who was diagnosed with Alzheimers in 2004 and yet 4
years later through the Goodman program in May of 2008 for the first time was
shown a group of family photos and recognized them all. It is a miracle Fraas
proclaimed. Other such marked improvements have been reported through the
ScienceDaily (Jan 9th 2008), The Mayo Clinic.'

Weighing in on that is the New England Journal of Medicine functional magnetic

resonance imaging report! The report confirms that scientists have been able to
reach into the mind of brain-damaged patients.

Awareness was detected in patients previously diagnosed as being in a

vegetative state. Scientists have shown that scans can detect signs of awareness
in patients thought to be closed off from the world.

Since this is with respect to patients diagnosed as being in a vegetative state

it condemns the Government and system that have denied the will and wishes of
patients that have not been diagnosed as being in a vegetative state.

THE MURDEROUS MATTER OF A SYSTEM OR HOSPITAL FACILITY COMMITTING A

COVER-UP HAS BEEN SEEN BEFORE. - (3 CASES) -

Manitoba's former Premier Gary Doer who wrote thanking me twice for one of
my preliminary GFR reports is accused along with his Health Minister of
conspiring with the system to cover-up the death of Brian Sinclair. He died on
Sept. 21st 2008 after 36 hours of neglect in an Emergency room. He was not
given any medical attention, no food nor any water to drink. The family filed a
law suit against the Government, Regional Health Authorities and facility staff.

On March 31st 2010 criminal lawyer Clayton Ruby gave his legal opinion on
Winnipeg's Police failing to investigate when there is reasonable grounds to.

The lawyer stated that the police's failure to investigate is "both inexplicable
and shocking".Two prominent Human Rights Professors agreed and stated that
to not investigate places the integrity of Canada's Justice system in question.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29281739/Sinclair-Press-Release

This is the sort of so-called justice that I am faced with, and the evidence of
the crimes against my Mother's life is more manifest than anything on the internet.
According to a June 2009 report a New York hospital falsified records and lied to
authorities to cover-up the death of patient Esmin Green who died on the
Emergency waiting room floor. She was in full view of Doctors, nurses and
security for one full hour before nudged and found dead. A senior nurse Aida
Gonzalo made 3 false medical record entries to have it appear as if there was no
neglect. A nurses aid also falsified records. Doctors failed to examine the woman,
wrote contradictions in their records and medical staff wrote false health
problems and treatment records according to DOI Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn.

In the Terri Schiavo case

they diagnosed her as being in a persistent vegetative state.

Terri Schiavo the parents fought for a decade to save her life against the
government's hold on her.

The parents were not able to save her from the system's hold even with
(50) neurologists seeing the diagnosis as a possible murderous lie.

R.N. Savor Iyer testified that Terri Schiavo’s ability to communicate

was systematically misrepresented.

Iyer testified that all the other nurses worked together to regularly delete from the
chart records communications that Iyre recorded and RN Iyer testified
that the nurses put their reputations before Schiavo's life.

There you have it,

Now people see that an entire Hospital facility may be guilty

with the Facility Management, Doctors, Head nurses, aids
and even the hospital’s security guards in on the cover-up.

All you have read proves the Government is guilty of the blackest crimes
and that Gale's life is in mortal peril.

The following will prove the matter in deeper ways;

The 3rd season of 2006 my Mother and I were convalescing from an infirmity
that a Doctor diagnosed as unknown. It was from months of ingesting colloidal
silver water. The health store assured us that it was a completely harmless
internal germ destroyer. I later found that too much colloidal silver may harm
the nerves, excite emotions, harden arteries, and eventually may compromise
the immune system and cause gastric problems. Drinking it as a water
substitute in time became the cause of internal infections and a heavy
somnolence in my Mother when still and while she would ambulate. My Mother
had moments of dullness and would often lose her balance. Providing
knowledge of health services, a wheel chair and helping in the healing of an
infection is a good thing yet not abducting a Mother from the care of her son
while denying legal Personal Directive Rights.
Jealous and malicious relatives that estrange themselves are often the cause of
misguiding. A Manchester England couple lost their 2 year-old daughter after a
misguided suspicion had authorities thinking that the couple harmed their
daughter. The child was found having a broken leg.

While the false accusation had the lives of the couple in ruin the House of Lords
rejected the Parents call to have the system reconcile the matter in 2005.

In that the couple was abused further by the justice system's pig-headed
unwillingness to listen to what they had to say.

http://www.falselyaccuseddad.com/the-negative-consequences-of-being-
falsely-accused/

http://hubpages.com/hub/CHILD-PROTECTION-SERVICES-HAVE-YOU-BECOME-THEIR-NEXT-
VICTIM-IT-DOESNT-TAKE-MUCH

After the accusation had their lives carved up into little pieces it was later
found that the cause was brittle bone disease.

In an appeal the Parents testified that their child was taken in a way that
denied them the right to host a full account and later in a way that denied the
need to give legal redress.

The European Appeal Court ruled unanimously that the lower courts judgment
was false and that although the authorities first had a duty towards the child,
that the system also had a duty to serve the Parents with legal redress.

The couple’s lawyer Emma Holt testified that the system had failed them in not
giving legal redress after taking the child.

The lawyer said that in these cases people often say -where there is smoke
there is fire! The lawyer marked that as a fallacy.

In the case of my Mother who entered in under Caritas and their Misericordia
Hospital their nurses in criminal neglect were closed against communicating in
spite of the legal fact that I was named on my Mother’s Personal Directive, and
in spite of my warning that their handling of my Mother was contrary to her
care needs.

I did not have to sign in to see my Mother, I was given the freedom to enter in
each day for many hours to nurse my Mothers needs and I was not under
the watch of any security nor nurses. I was even trusted to give my Mother
penicillin pills and Tylenol pills that they left on her food tray.

Also keep in mind that the need to communicate and welcome would also be
for the effect that I had towards my Mother while I was in each day for hours to
give comfort and care !!! - I was also in fear that if I did not leave that they
would re-channel their gruff onto my Mother before or after visiting hours.
After turning a blind-eye and a deaf ear to my warnings that my ill elderly
Mother was knotted into shock & fear from being plucked from my care, and
suffering harm from their care being contrary to her needs and further harm
from intimidating & violent ways that I caught them handling her -Caritas and
their facility then in secret put my Mother through a obedience and functional
effectiveness test.

That was a conspiracy to commit fraud through forging a diagnosis to cover-up

trauma and psychiatric injury.

It was not logical to test my Mother apart from seeking any critical knowledge
that I knew of her.

My warnings gave them reason to believe that any tests done apart from my
knowledge would be in alarming ignorance of her.

They did not communicate when there was a critical need to be given redress
and in the face of there being a Personal Directive.

The criminal neglect was extortion. Caritas and members of their Misericordia
Hospital administration have violated the criminal code according to section
219.(1) that reads: everyone is criminally negligent who(a) is doing anything or
(b) omitting to do anything that is his duty to do, shows wanton or reckless
disregard for the lives or safety of others. Criminal neglect does not require
proof of willfulness or intention -indifference is sufficient.

Caritas and members of their Administration are also in violation of section

216. Under,‘ Duty of persons under taking acts dangerous to life’, according to
section 216 of the criminal code; ‘everyone who undertakes to administer
surgical or medical treatment to another person, or to do any other lawful act
that may endanger the life of another, is under a legal duty to have and to use
reasonable knowledge and care in doing so, except in cases of necessity.

Caritas were also in violation of the Principle of Law, Quad ab initio non valet,
in tractu temporis non convalescit, that is; ‘What is not valid in the beginning
does not become valid in time.

Section # 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is violated, since

‘Freedom of Thought’ is being violated..
Section # 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is violated, (the Right to
security) through subverting the psychological integrity of my Mother’s mind, We see
that is a real matter in the case of the Caritas nurses sexual assault on the terminally ill
senior at Caritas’s Edmonton General. http://elderadvocates.ca/sexual-assault-at-
the-edmonton-general-care-center/

Section 7 is also violated in violating the ‘ Right to Life’ in destroying longevity.

I warned again in a Nov 6th faxed letter of there being peril in their nursing.
While hiding my fear of the extortion in their neglect I faxed the letter to the
Minister of Health Iris Evans and to Caritas through one of their Vice Presidents
of Operations.

I did not know whether or not the Minister was in bed with Alberta's Caritas agency
and so I limited my letter to telling of there being heavy handed nursing.

The Minister of Health Iris Evans wrote me a Nov 28th 2006 letter (shockingly
22 days later) after what I believe were secret talks with Caritas.

In the letter Iris Evans stated that she was sorry to hear that there was a
question of possible lacking care and dignity in the way the Caritas Agency's
Misericordia attendants were nursing and she instructed me in her letter to
have “Caritas” look into the matter.

That was too strange reading that in the letter from Iris Evans since Alberta
Health's Caritas agency had to know of my Nov 6th/06 fax, and yet within the
22 days I received no letter nor word from Caritas in return.

Remember on the matter of the cancer patient deaths Stelmach's former

parliamentary assistant Raj Sherman stated that Stelmachs former health minister
IIrriiss E
Evvaannss is also someone that has suppressed critical knowledge.

On Nov 8th/06 the PRC was passing me in the hall. I stopped her and asked her
what was happening. She said she would look into what Caritas had to say to
me and she continued walking! She did not speak with me with respect to any
letter. I received no word from Caritas ! The next day (Nov 9th) I witnessed
further unbefitting nursing practices that I had to report.
On Nov 11th/06 I received word ‘that a notice’ was placed on the wall where
the nurses desk was that instructed the nurses to deny me access to my Mom.

The notice was like shutting out the media. After I voiced that I would seek for
an inquest into the death of my Rights minutes later I received word that the
notice was "a mistake".

The notice was to see if I’d leave through the extortion of false authority
and was to trigger anger as a form of entrapment. (Burying and concealing
Casus belli)

The criminal conspiracy of placing the notice on the wall was also a violation of
section 3 1(b) of the Human Rights Act since it planted in others the thought of
being divided against me and hateful.

On Nov 16th/06 Alberta Health's Caritas Agency used their security Head to tell
me over the phone that I was banned for 3 months and they refused to account
for the ban. It was the 29th day that my Mother had been there and no one
ever spoke to me of my warnings that my Mother was being held against her
will nor of my fears towards their care of her and not one time did any speak to
me of my Nov 6th fax.

There was not any Just reason for the ban and if the story were other than the
story was and any did exist the ban nonetheless would be in violation of the
principle of law, Bonum ex integra causa, malum ex quocunque defectu, That
is,= An action is good only if each element is good, it is bad if any one of those
elements is bad.

Before you read of the ban

first have in mind that Alberta’s Provincial Seniors Advocate Ruth Adria wrote
of Caritas banning her and that it was an unprovoked banning. The Advocate
wrote of a restraining order against her through the Misericordia Security
office. The Provincial Patients Advocate wrote; "I have never been served any
documents, (nor was I aware of what the facility was claiming. I had been
removed from the Misericordia Hospital on February 19, 2004 -
http://elderadvocates.ca/unprovoked-banning-of-visitor-at-caritas-hospitals/
Now with that in mind; The day before the ban I told Caritas through their so-
called Public Relations Coordinator Ms. C.Z. that. L.S who I met (for the first
time) (the patient care manager) in heavy thorny neglect he would not
communicate with me and was using blank accusing & extortion.

When I saw Ms.C.Z and told her of the blank accusing (Extortion) she agreed
that we would all get together the next day to talk of it, yet it was a lie as the
next day security Head Mr. D.D told me over the phone that I was banned for 3
months because I did not agree with Mr. L.S. I then told him that L.S. did not
name any offense and that it is fraud to want me to agree to not commit an
offense that L.S. was not willing to name. Security Head Mr.D.D then said that
I’d have to go through Caritas to have the matter investigated.

In Alberta Health's Caritas agency not meeting the next day ‘as Ms.C.Z said
they would’ to communicate the matter of my report of L.S. they were acting
as partners in crime with L.S. to subvert my authority and to conspire a
fraudulent ban.

It was manifest that having Caritas investigate L.S. and the ban was as having
suspects investigating a suspect. After I was told of the ban my phone-calls to
Caritas were stonewalled for 4 days until Nov 20th.

After I was told of the ban I faxed a report to Alberta Health's Caritas agency to
document my verbal report to them of L.S. the day before the ban.

I knew I was in need of a paper trail since I was watching the Alberta's Health
system commit a scandal.

The day before that ban began L.S. began accusing me of a past offense against
the nurses. When I asked If he would name what it was he was speechless. The
so-called patient care manager L.S. did not name a single offense and then said
that if I did not stop that something bad would happen, yet he did not name
what that would be.

My being in fear for the Rights of my Mother is what they were wanting rid of,
not any offense!

It was on the Nov 20th/06 day that I warned Caritas’s PRC(Ms. C.Z) over the
phone, that I would report the Agency to the PRESS if they did not stop
isolating my Mother from seeing me which was criminal fraud, a hostage taking
and murderous injury and atrophy to her life.

The Agencies deceiving PRC said to me over the phone that there was nothing
she could do about the ban, and said that she had no account to give from
Caritas for the ban. I asked her if I could have it in writing, and four hours later
I received their Nov 20th/06 couriered letter.

They hastened to write and courier it and in that left marks and signs of
their guiltiness in the way they wrote it
 The Smoking Gun Evidence
against the Government
and Health System
is Sky High.

Alberta Health's Caritas Agency wickedly thanked me in their letter

for ("waiting for the 4 days") for the Agency to review matters. -Acting as if I
was waiting for them to review was a horror of a lie since after security told
me over the phone on the 16th of the ban my phone-calls were then
stonewalled until the 20th and the only time I heard from Caritas towards the
ban was 4 hours before the couriered letter when I was told he ban was final.

Caritas wrote their letter the way they did to have it appear as if the ban was
a decision and as if that was with the understanding that they were open to an
appeal. Alberta Health's Caritas agency wrote to disguise that the ban was a
conspiracy to abort communications that began on the 15th and to fire
heavy ammunition on the 16th in the form of the ban. What the Public and
Media also need to know is that acting as if I was waiting the 4 days for them to
review is contrary to them telling me that the ban would be for 3 months.

The fraudulent ban was final and when I asked for that in writing they wrote a
letter to act as if it was not final. (It is as the time of the November 11th notice.)

The couriered Nov 20th letter stated that the Agency would meet with me near
the end of the month to reconsider the ban if I made no phone-calls to them.
The truth of why they were willing to meet is that they ddiidd nnoott w waanntt m
mee
ttaallkkiinngg ttoo tthhee PPRREESSSS. The Agency also would not meet with me until the end
of the month since the ban was a lie and their plan was to use the time to
think of a way to confuse and to use extortion.
 Alberta Health's Caritas agency
did not care that each minute
of the fraudulent isolation
would place Gale's life
in deeper peril.

The letter began with weasel words. The origin of the term ‘weasel words’ is
from the egg that a weasel has sucked that looks in tact, yet is empty. The
wording of the letter gave the appearance of authority, an illusion of authority
to a casual reader, yet in no way was it an account.

The letter marked the 33rd day of the Agency board and attendants
continuing in criminal neglect against the simple duty to welcome and
communicate to know of the umbilical nature of my care of my Mother (who
named me as her Agent on a Personal Directive.)

The letter also marked the 33rd day of the Alberta Health Agency continuing
in criminal neglect against the duty to communicate for redress.

Respecting the warning of there being sole care or a family bond is seen in the
latin principle; A posse ad esse non valet consequential: that is; (From a things
possibility one cannot be certain of the reality.) That Principle of law is seen in
films such as, " I am Sam", "Nell", "John Q" and "curly sue" to name a few.

Sole care and bond realities are why you do not ever deny redress when
there is a charge that false authority was taken.

The Nov 20th/06 letter in fraud ((feigned ‘a reminder)) in stating that ("as you
know") your nursing concerns before the ban were forwarded to the patient
care manager.(L.S.) -.

The Agency wrote that in their letter to have it ‘appear’ to any on the
'outside' of the conspiracy as if the agency had given me assurance (before
the ban) that there were no unstable nursing matters.

That was never said to me and you know it did not happen since (you cannot)
give assurance when there is the denying of a Personal Directive and when
there is the denying of the need for redress. My report that you are reading
proves that Caritas were denying those two needs.
The matter of feigning a reminder of assurance proves that The Caritas
Health Groups Nov 20th06 letter is a false document in violation of section
366(1)(a) of the Criminal Code.

The letter gave the account that I was banned to stop past offenses. The
Caritas Agency's account that there had been past offenses reflected a
shapeless mass of clay, and was verily contrary to reason, since as you have
read only five days before the ban I received the apology for the Nov 11th
notice. (A video recording proves this.)

Reason stands that if I committed any past offenses as Caritas veiled in their
Nov 20th06 letter, then on Nov 11th06 I would not have received the apology.

The letter also stated that the ban was to end stumbling blocks to the way that
the nurses were working. Denying the Personal Directive and Redress proves
they did not have a right to that claim.

As you may remember I have also proven that claim is fraud in the part of
this report where I wrote of the nurse named Chris. In that is the principle of
law, Ab assuetis non fit inuria,= that is ; No injury is done by things long
acquiesced in.

Their account for the ban also failed reason since the letter contained Caritas
admitting that I identified that the nurses placed on the ward were not suited
to be nursing on that ward. The letter also contained Caritas admitting that I
identified that the nursing instructor was teaching the student nurses in a way
that was not befitting or sensitive.

The admissions were to appear as ruling well under the sight of the Minister of
Health who received my Nov 6th letter, yet in speeding to write their Nov
20th couriered letter Caritas failed to see that their admissions also
confirmed that they were committing fraud since Caritas had to know that in
light of there being unstable nursing if I did appear to be in the way that my
stepping in was reasonable & justifiable under section 11 of the Human Rights
Act. This for certain proves that the account for the ban is fraud.

I was not in the way, they spent very little time in my Mother’s room and it was
not often when they did.

As well is the case citing of Wagner vs. International Railway 232N.Y.176. In the
citing a Justice Cardozo stated that "danger invites rescue". In that is
established what is known as the ‘Rescue Doctrine’. In that a wrong doer is
accountable if he seen the deliverer coming. Caritas knew that I had warned
them for weeks that their nursing was unstable and unbefitting and blind.

The ban was fraud and all I am testifying of proves that the Caritas Health
Groups Nov 20th06 letter is a false document in violation of section 366(1)(a) of
the Criminal Code.
Under section 366(1) of the Criminal Code: Everyone..who makes a false
document knowing it to be false, with intent (a) that it should in any way be
used or acted on as genuine to the prejudice of another is in violation of the
Criminal Code.

Towards the matter of how my Mother was placed into their facility, the
Agency wrote in their Nov 20th letter that they reviewed a statement I had
faxed to them even though I was not asked to account for a thing. Indeed there
was not any redress and my care of my Mother in the facility each day was full
and not under any watch.

In that we have the latin Principle; EXCUSATIO NON PETITA ACCUSATIO

MANIFESTA -AN EXCUSE THAT HAS NOT BEEN SOUGHT IS AN OBVIOUS
ACCUSATION.

In Alberta Health's Caritas agency manifesting in their Nov 20th letter (‘33 days
after’ (day 1)) that they had ample authority or allotment to review, and yet
not acting open to communicate for redress proves that they knew redress was
a matter and so proves that in a conspiracy they were denying the critical and
vital need for redress.

The letter also shows Caritas acting as if my Mother was ill and yet not taken to
the Doctor when the very estranged relative had authorities violate the law in
taking her through mischief.

That was false as I told Caritas before that my Mother was #1 ingesting a Doctor
prescribed anti-infection medication, #2 had an appointment scheduled to see
a eye-specialist for the Iritis in her eye, #3 received a physical examination
that year and that #4 my Mother was taken against her will.

The letter also contains Caritas saying that they reviewed my Mothers medical
records. And in that I have great reason to believe that they hid that they
had knowledge of a hospital discharge summary from my Mothers past that
confirms my report of my Mothers uncommon fear of facilities and of
strangers handling her.

The system knew not to risk subverting sole care nor a family bond.

Under section 262 (b) of the Criminal Code reads; Everyone who without
reasonable cause impedes or attempts to impede any person who is attempting
to save the life of another person, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years. R.S.,c.C-34,s.241.
THE NOVEMBER 30TH 2006 MEETING.

Ten days after the couriered letter I then met with the Agency members.

Remember through those 10 murderous days I was continuing to suffer the fear
of knowing my Mother's life was in peril. According to what Caritas wrote in the
couriered Nov 20th letter I was not allowed to call for that 10 days to know
what was happening to my Mother. Of course the Patient Care Manager (L.S.)
did not attend the meeting.

I new it was a matter of life and death to gain a recording of the meeting with
the health board.

The meeting was of course not to give redress. It was to use Extortion to serve
a deal. That was manifest in the meeting beginning in telling me of what the
boundaries of the meeting would be and of the narrow time I would be given to
see my Mother.

In the meeting Caritas then said that they all recognize that I was my Mother’s
caregiver for a long time, and said that they were all sure that it left quite a
void in me that she was separated from my home and through the ban.

In Alberta Health's Caritas agency saying that -was to act as if there were
not warnings and evidence that my Mother was in critical and vital need of
my care. It was also to act as if there was not a Personal Directive and as if
there was not a need -to communicate that and for redress against false or
mistaken authority taken.

The Agency stated in the meeting, that they were all sure that I needed to
keep in touch with my Mother. Caritas then said that the ban was to stop me
from threatening the nurses so their work of nursing would serve the fullest
care. In that Caritas were accusing me of offenses that they did not ever name.
In that Alberta Health's Caritas agency were committing Extortion.

Caritas then warned that I would have the narrow time of (15 minutes a day) to
see my Mother and said that I would have that -if I did not try reaching the
Minister of Health again.
This proves again my Mother’s life was held through Extortion.

Extortion under section 346 (1) of the criminal code READS; Every one commits
Extortion WHO not having a Justified reason with the intent to obtain anything,
threatens or accuses to induce or even attempt to induce any person to do
anything or cause anything to be done.

Under section 346(1.1)-(b) Every one who commits Extortion is guilty of an

indictable offense, and liable to imprisonment for life.

Where there is an act of Extortion and forcible Confinement, the matter then is
that of a Hostage Taking.

In that Alberta Health's Caritas agency & members of their Administration

have committed an act of Hostage Taking.

Under section 279.1(1), of the Criminal Code, Every one takes a person
hostage who; forcibly seizes and confines another. AND in any manner utters
or conveys, or causes any person to receive (a threat) that the confinement of
the hostage will continue unless the person commits or causes any other to
commit any act or omission of an act.(2) Every person who takes a person
hostage is guilty of an indictable offense and according to part (b) liable to
imprisonment for life.

In the meeting I then again gave the warning that the matter of my Mother
being taken and held under their care was not lawful and gave the warning that
I had two weeks of recordings of my Mother and I proving the harm it was
causing.

The V.P. of Operations for Caritas Ms.S.M then said in the meeting that they did
not wish to diminish my intention but that the meeting was for me to hear of
their plan to see my Mother again. In that was to deny what I said and was
further stirring of Extortion.

In the meeting I then spoke to remind the Alberta Health board that the day
after my Mother was taken one of their agents that they deal with said that it
was "absurd" of the hospital in not it not letting me see my Mother.

It was lower than absurd, it would be criminal, and the board had to have
seen that my warning of the recordings may have proven key and deeper
reasons why it would be absurd. In the board denying that through burdening
me into obeying the meeting proves again Alberta’s Caritas board were
committing life destroying fraud and Extortion.

I then began to remind Caritas of critical facts that happened before the ban.
I did that in order to gather evidence of their fraud while I was recording the
Alberta heath board meeting.
Ms.C.Z. for Caritas admitted that there were times that I had a reason to be
upset and that one of those times was when I received word on Nov 11th of a
false notice.

When I began to say that there was not any reason for the ban, Ms.S.M the VP
of Operations for Alberta Health's Caritas agency then cut in and contrary to
there being the undeniable matter of the notice and contrary to Ms.C.Z’s
admissions =(Ms.S.M began ‘acting’ as if the ban was because of the way I was
when I first heard of the Nov 11th false notice.)

Ms.S.M began saying that Caritas and their Administration knew there were
things that should not have happened against me but that their nurses cannot
ever feel threatened.

Saying that was contrary to reason, since it denied that the Nov 11th Notice
was either a criminal matter or legal issue that they had a duty to reconcile.
In that is damning evidence of Extortion.

Saying that their nurses cannot ever feel threatened was also contrary to
reason since Ms.S.M did not name any offense and did not mark Nov 11th as
the account for the ban in their Nov 20th letter. In that confirms Extortion.

She was acting as if I was in strife on the Nov 11th day when I heard of the
notice (yet after admitting) the matter of the notice was reason to presume
that I was defending my Mother from a notice set to illegally isolate her.

When I asked in the meeting what sort of an offense we were speaking of the
Agency then suggested that I would be banned indefinitely if I asked further for
them to account for the ban. I voiced that I was concerned with their weighing
of the matter being one-sided in their. Caritas did not have any account and
when I sought to fish for one, they then again used Extortion.

("INDEFINATELY" they said;) From the Latin: Dosis facit venenom; that is,= It is
the dose that makes the poison. The word indefinitely also serves as evidence
that the plan was to subvert my Mother’s Personal Directive.

That also proves that Alberta Health's Caritas Agency and members of their
Misericordia Administration committed further Extortion in violation of section
346 (1) of the criminal code.

In the meeting Ms.S.M for Caritas then appeared to be asking me a question,

and then quickly looked to another member for an answer as if looking to
confirm that my Mother would be placed in a long term care facility, and that’s
when the other member nodded. I felt shock & fear shoot into me when she
said that. I then spoke in the form of a righteous mock in saying, "I understand
everything your saying very well".

Domitius Ulpianus the professor of law, Jurist, and Imperial Official of Tyrian
Ancestry wrote; Nihil consensui tam contrarium est, quam vis atque metus:
quem comprobare contra bonos mores est-
In the meeting I then gave a reminder of my report that when I met with the
Patient Care Manager before the ban (for the first time ever) that he was
unwilling to communicate, blank accusing & threatening in Extortion.

Ms.C.Z Patent Relations Coordinator for Caritas who is also a MN & RN, then
said to me; "I investigated that, ok!"- That was not logical since in Caritas
naming it an investigation (serving an account was a matter of course.) From
the Principle Suppressio veri suggestio est falsi,, = Withholding the truth is
evidence of falsehood. And in using the word "ok" I felt I was being told to not
speak further of it.

Hiding the matter of the Patient Care Manager being unwilling to communicate
confirms again the criminal neglect against my Mother’s Personal Directive and
against the need for redress, and the word "ok" confirms evidence of further
stirring of Extortion.

In the meeting I then reminded Caritas of my faxes that recorded the unstable
and unbefitting nursing practices that I witnessed, and I then said that none of
that should have been happening to begin with.

Mr.G.S VP of Ethics for Caritas then said; "Let’s agree that this is a turning
point". Members of the public that have read those words of Mr.G.S have in
shock asked me the question; "What was that suppose to mean?" In saying
what he did after what I said was in sleight a deal of Extortion. Also from the
Latin Dum excusare credis, accusas that is = He who excuses himself, "accuses
himself ".

In not agreeing that it was a turning point I then said the meeting to Alberta
Health's Caritas board; "Because that’s a conspiracy then right! And then if
you guys are pushing me away then it’s the cover-up of a conspiracy, is the way
I’ve felt that’s all!"

The Public, Media and all in any position of power ought to see it is Paramount
that I said that to Alberta Health's clinical Empire Caritas.

In ending what I said using the words "that's all" also shows that I had fear of
saying more.

In the meeting Ms.CZ for Caritas then to Justify the ban said that the nurses did
feel threatened. The feign of fear and pity, was a false witness, and was to
commit the fallacy known as Argumentum ad misericordiam, that is; ‘ appeal
to pity to get a conclusion accepted’ and the formless accusing in the words of
Ms.CZ was further Extortion.

I had proven that the ban was not Justified, and in Ms. C,Z saying that proves
that Caritas were saddling themselves onto all that I did prove in the
meeting that they knew was a climb for me to put into words. Imagine a
Justice system that is so evil that it acts as if all that was proven did not begin
to be. That is the game. It is also known as a vicious circle.
I then warned Alberta Health's Caritas agency again in the meeting that they
did appear to be committing a criminal conspiracy in having me banned after
I reported their body's harmful and unstable nursing. (One of many reasons why
the ban was fraud). Not having a sound answer and confirming again Extortion.
.S.M for Caritas then said; "And Shawn we’re not going to discuss that today,
what we’re discussing today is how you are coming back into the system so that
you can see your Mother."

The way that I was spoken to reflects a potent form of the Petitio principii
fallacy, also known as a vicious circle or ‘begging the question’, or circulus in
probando, where a conclusion returns again and again spoken of as if it were a
part of the evidence to justify a lack of evidence or not any. This assumes the
conclusion is true yet does not show it to be and has the communication talking
in circles, and enables the speaker to have the hearer in shock and forgetting.

In the meeting I then voiced that I was very troubled that Ms CZ wrote (in the
Nov 20th letter) that while I was being banned Caritas had a meeting to set
straight nursing since it was to deny my knowledge of my Mother and legal right
to communicate the Personal Directive and redress.

I then warned Caritas that in them neglecting pseudo dementia thresholds that
there is a real danger in the Health Care System. I then asked if they were
hopping to close the meeting to bury what I had to say on that. Rather than
serve the need to communicate further in order to attend my thoughts, Caritas
denied my warning and chose to close the meeting. (close=suture) It is as the
Oct 2006 report of the 4 prominent Senior Physicians in israel who were
arrested for experimenting on the elderly. At least 12 seniors died. The
Hospitals Administration did nothing despite signs of the experimenting.

In the meeting I then said in the form of a subtle righteous mock; "My Mother
has suffered wondering where I was all this time too, it’s a kind of concern of
mine." Ms.S.M for Caritas then said, "She’ll be very happy then to see you back
again." That again proves they were denying my Mother’s critical and vital
Rights. Think of the 'temperature' in what the board said.

Remember,
Remember before that in the meeting I gave them the warning
that I had two weeks worth of recording’s confirming that we
were both being abused from others fallaciously or
fraudulently defining our tribulation.

I then warned Caritas that I had recordings of my Mother confirming that she
felt she was being institutionalized and I warned that my Mother was crying
voicing that she missed me.

In denying all of those warnings proves Caritas and members of their

Administration were denying critical & life-saving recordings that prove my
Mother was being held against her will and that her life was in peril.
I then warned that I was in fear that in all of their sensitivities would be at the
cost of unknown sensitivities. When I said that they did not show any evidence
of caring to communicate. I then said that I knew they had their own high
education and In a subtle way I then gave the warning that my own abilities
would be working to have them pay if anything irreversible or fatal were to
happen to her.

I then said to Caritas, "I just hope we understand each other" / Ms.S.M for
Caritas then said, "I believe we do!" In that was another appearance of a Mens
Rea, or "Guilty mind."

In fear for my Mother that Caritas would have me barred I had no choice but to
follow their subverting and illegal designs .There are many examples of
Extortion I have given host to and of them denying critical warnings.

The recorded and transcribed board meeting is now marked as Exhibit B,

against Alberta's Government and Health Authorities since the matter entered
into Court. I will tell of the court cover-up of that further down in this report.
In that I remind you of the following;

Oct 2009 Edmonton lawyer Beresh proclaimed his fear that Stelmach commits
political interference using Edmonton's court system. CBC

On march 29th 2010 before a commons committee on crime in Edmonton MP

Joe Comartin asked if Alberta Judges, Prosecutors and Police are into
organized crime and Police Chief Hanson stated; "The answer to that is yes"

On 2010 Brent McGiillis wrote an article entitled; "Alberta's Rampant

Government Corruption and the Death of Democracy" McGiillis wrote; "Even the
justice system..is a complete disgrace to a free and open democracy."

McGiillis wrote; "You have to ask yourself exactly why there's never been
any investigations of MLA's here in Alberta as long as anyone can
remember".

A part of the Extortion of the Nov 30th/06 meeting was to have the (15)
minutes a day with my Mother under security accompaniment.

Caritas were forming an artificial appearance that my Mom was in need of

them while hiding brutal & murderous harm they were causing

After that Nov 30th /06 meeting I walked from the boardroom to the seventh
floor where they held my Mother. When my Mother saw me, in an appearance
of heavy helplessness and mourning she said ; "Shawn I haven’t seen you for so
long"! I witnessed that she was in trauma and fear from the breach of care and
from being isolated from me. - I am my Mom’s agent, own flesh and blood and
greatest friend so in my Mother’s mind & heart there was not any sense in not
hearing from me for the two weeks.
I did record the Nov 11th/06 day when the so-called "mistake" of the notice was
put up against me, In that I was able to prove to Caritas after the meeting that
I did not threaten the nurses. I did not let Caritas know that in the meeting
because I needed to see what lying would appear.

I let Caritas also see a video of the harm that the ban did to my Mother.

The recordings also reveal my Mother giving me the authority to act as her
agent and that I did not have to ask.

They admitted in the meeting that they knew I was on call as my Mother’s
steward for 10 months and they knew I was named on my Mother’s Personal
Directive and they knew that I had Power of Attorney and yet in fear from
their own neglect and so in fear for their reputation as a clinical empire
under Alberta’s Capital Health they were committing fraud in conspiring to
dismember a strong family bond.

Caritas and Misericordia Administration members had a duty to account for the
ban and yet they spoke to confuse and mislead using fallacies and blank
accusing to justify the fraudulent ban, and 14 days after the ban began in the
Nov 30th meeting they even sought to kick accusing up into the air using talk of
the Nov 11th day. They buried and concealed that they did not have an account
for the ban. "Bury" speaks of what they did to my Mom and "conceal" speaks of
what they did to me.

It is manifest that Alberta Health's Caritas agency and Misericordia

administration members have committed criminal fraud in violation of sec.341
of the Criminal code.

After seeing the video of the Nov 11th time of the notice and recordings of my
Mother they lifted the short-lived security and turned the 15 minutes into 45
minutes when they had a legal duty to return my Mother to my care.

Caritas had no definable objective and there was not in any way a minimal
impairment of rights.

Remember, they also hid past medical records confirming my warnings of

my Mother having an uncommon fear of facilities and of strangers nursing
her. (Eggshell). Caritas also knew the recordings proved I was the ONLY one
my Mother was communicating with and confiding in. From the Latin;
Altissima quaeque fluminia minimo sono labi; that is; = The deepest rivers
flow with the least sound. and; Hores non numero nisi serenas, = I do not
count the hours unless they are sunny.

In one recording my Mother confided (in me) that the nurses and others,
were not seeing who she is and that their empathy was a blind way of
nursing her.
My Mother warned that their hold on her and handling of her was placing
her stableness in peril. Gale warned that the way they were handling her
was causing shocking fear and that she felt she was being institutionalized.

While I was being banned the Caritas agencies hid a report that my Elderly
Mother had moments when she was resisting their care. The video
recordings confirm that I have the power to reach my Mother and that they
do not. The video recordings confirm my Mother was communicating with
me after Caritas, their Doctors, social worker, & nursing attendants, gave
the report that my Mother was not able to.

The video recordings proved that unlawfully confining my Mother was to

impede my attempt to save my Mother’s life and in having it continue
conspiring to commit murder.

Under section 445(1)(a) =Every one who conspires with any to commit
murder or to cause another person to be murdered…is guilty of an
indictable offense liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life.

Homicide is defined in the Criminal Code. Under section 222(1) : A person

commits homicide when directly or indirectly by any means causes the death of
a human being.

A person commits culpable homicide when he does cause the death of a

human being by means of an unlawful act that may be in the form of
criminal neglect and may in sophistry and quiet fallaciously mimic as if it is
non-criminal deception.

Within this time of the November ban the Agencies and its social worker JBM
were secretly planting in the mind of an estranged relative to apply for
guardianship against my Mothers Personal Directive. The secret
communications were in violation of Division 2, part 8(1)(b) under persons
eligible, of the Dependent Adults Act since in the act of seeking to have
guardianship against my Mothers Personal Directive was contrary to my
Mother’s interests.
Page 2 part B of my Mother’s Personal Directive also proves the matter is
murderous since my Mother was communicating and so was to be returned to
care and they were doing great harm to my Mother's and so even if my Mother
was not able to communicate further I was to be given all authority to choose
for her.

To have an application set into motion, Caritas had to declare my Mother a

Dependant Adult, and they did not have lawful authority to after victimizing
her. Per, Dir,Act,sec,15d

In that Caritas violated section 430(1.1) of the Criminal Code in (a) altering the
records that they had of my Mother ; in #1 burying their knowledge of the
recordings of my Mother, #2 burying their knowledge that the recordings of my
Mother had proven false their diagnoses report, in #3 neglecting to be open to
my knowledge of my Mother, in #3 burying and concealing the trust and
consent appearing confirmation in the recordings and in #4 burying the truth of
the horror of harm they were causing as seen in the recordings and evident in
their own records.

A health system know it is criminal to declare a senior a dependent adult and

to apply to have guardianship based on these facts and all of this that they
knew of is the least that there is to say on the matter.

On December 13th 2006 I heard that my Mother untied the straps to the
wheeled chair that they had her in and then fell only feet from the nurses desk
onto the floor of their palliative unit. That proved that they had no right
condemning me for my report that my Mother had fallen when she was with me
in my home. I spoke to the Social worker Ms J.B.M who used the whole time
defending the hospitals reputation. She spoke in a cold way in front of my
Mother and said; "We cannot sit and watch your Mother 24hours a day, 7days
a week to ensure that she does not fall!"

(The recording that I have of this conversation proves these were the words of
the worker.)

Since the social workers true colors were showing, I used that time to test if
she would return my Mother to me under the Personal Directive. I knew that if I
received a message from Ms JBM that was contrary to the one that I was
receiving from Caritas that I would have further evidence of fraud. In no way
were Caritas to sound as if they had engines of authority on against me
contrary to their own social worker on the 56th day. I gathered the recording
of the worker manifesting contrary messages!
I was not certain if the worker had inside knowledge of the fraud happening
and so I spoke as if there was not any fraud and as if I was weighing the
benefits of long-term care. I knew the worker would not admit to a thing if she
thought I was after her for a matter of neglect and fraud.

It is a hell of a thing that there are children that act as if they know a parent
better than they do. The University of Alberta Hospital diagnosed a woman as
having dementia and forced into a nursing home based on a competency test
done in a language she didn't understand.

Officials with the Elder Advocates of Alberta Society stated that some members
of the woman's family told doctors that their mother wasn't eating properly and
couldn't care for herself.

The Society stated that the old woman is competent and that the family
members have acted against the will and wishes of the senior in seeking to
have guardianship and in seeking to place her in a long-term care facility.

That fits with the New Brunswick Court of Appeal citing where I wrote the
transcriptions of senior's testimony.

http://www.680news.com/news/national/article/51040--judge-orders-new-
assessment-for-edmonton-senior-at-centre-of-competency-
case?ref=topic&name=Radio680News&title=

The Elder Advocates Of Alberta Society have also

marked Edmonton's Office of the Public Guardian and
Office of the Public Trustee as corrupt since the
Alberta Society stated that by the Offices actions
or inaction they caused harm to a senior.

The Society stated that the Government did harm the

senior with respect to a matter of sterilization
and that in that the Offices in serving as her
guardian and trustee have been acting in a conflict
of interest.

The Alberta Society also stated that the sworn

affidavits of those Offices seriously appear to
have been designed to mislead Edmonton's law
Courts.http://elderadvocates.ca/emma-frank-abuse-of-a-dependent-adult/
One of the key letters I faxed to Caritas was on Dec 18th/06. This fax proves
how much Caritas knew.

The Dec 18th 2006 5 page fax to Caritas is one of the key records that for
certain proves the scandal.

In that letter I wrote to remind Caritas of the past. I was not banned when I
gave them this.

In the letter I warned that;

(1)
I knew that the ban was not Justified, and that the Patient Care Manager verily
appeared to be committing blank accusing and criminal Extortion the day
before the ban.

(2)
In the letter I then remind Caritas that the video of the Nov 11th time of the
notice that we seen after the Nov 30th 2006 meeting had proven that the ban
was set into motion from formless testimony.

(3)
In the letter I then warned Caritas that before the ban that they and their
Administration were in violation of section 3(1)b of the Human Rights Act in
having the hate and evil eye spreading Notice put up. That is key with respect
to the blank accusing and ban.

(4)
In the letter I then asked Caritas to stop writing fiction. In the letter I then
reminded and warned Caritas that I know my Mother’s inward language and
that the hospital does not and that nor did any of my siblings and that I
needed to be there to communicate with my Mother. In that they had to have
known I was speaking of sole care. - I then reminded and warned Caritas that
my being able to be there with my Mother was vital to her mental health. In
the letter I then reminded and warned that my Mother was abducted from my
care. I then reminded and warned that the narrow time restrictions were very
perilous to her well being. In the letter I then warned that if my Mother’s
ability to communicate were to collapse that I would hold Caritas and their
Misericordia Hospital responsible.
 The next part in this web of wickedness happened on Christmas Day. 2007
(THE 2ND BAN)

Before you read of that perhaps you remember I wrote - that in December 2009
Wendy McDonald the President of the Association for Community Living stated;
that Premier Stelmach's Government "is going after the most vulnerable people
in Alberta and their families" Wendy also stated; "We should be celebrating
(the Christmas holidays) and enjoying family rather than living in fear!"

Caritas had given me 4 hours to be with my Mother from 10am to 2 pm. -Before
the time ended the estranged sibling appeared who triggered the Charter
breach that led to my Mother being taken against her will. The jealous half
sibling was seen only a few times a year and was a liar yet not as a phony but
more as a story teller and faker. When she entered in on the ward she began
causing trouble for the Charge Nurse and was upsetting my Mother. The Nurse
then reminded me of the time that I had remaining and asked me to leave to
quiet the sibling. I then said that the sibling was trespassing on the time given
to me to be with my Mother. My Mother has hidden fear of the sibling and
Caritas are without excuse since we have films such as Misery, The Hand That
Rocks the Cradle and Fatal Attraction. Rather than call security on the sibling
to guard the time that I had remaining, the Charge Nurse threatened to call
security (on me) if I did not leave. My Mother heard the way the Nurse and the
sibling were speaking to me since her room was only feet from the nurse’s
desk. When I went in her room my Mother asked me if everything was all right
in a way that was bearing all fear and compassion for me. I instructed her to
not worry, and I told her that I would see her tomorrow.

The Extortion and fraud of the nurse is as what Senator Nancy Schaefer wrote
of when she stated; "No longer is judgment based on what the loved-one needs
or want to be with") but is based on some adult or bureaucrat who makes the
decisions ((-"based often on hearsay"-)) or "so-called abuse". Call me crazy but
when the Mother of a son is saying to the son; "I love you and trust you, I don't
trust them, please protect me and save me from them" then people having
sound minds would see that as proving the son is not the enemy or problem.

To my horror I did not see her the next day, since the next morning on Dec
26th06 when I entered in to see her Caritas's security told me that I was banned
and said that it was for threatening security the day before when I spoke to
them of the Charge Nurse violating the time given to me on. I then warned
security that I recorded that time and so asked them to name any so-called
offense. Security had no offense to name. In not giving an account for why they
were saying to my face that they were banning me, security were committing
Extortion. I then warned them that they were placing my Mother’s life in peril
in isolating her from me again. I tried phoning Caritas to ask why their security
banned me and I received no telephone answer in return.

Security did not mail me a single letter to account for the ban.

The last words that I said to my Mother were, "I’ll see you tomorrow." - I did
not see her, and the ban that began the day after Christmas continued for
10 days.

Imagine those being the last words that you said to your Mother.

This should not have happened since Caritas seen my recordings confirming
that the first ban caused heavy fear and damage to my Mom, and had her in
heart-wrenching tears wondering where I was.

I reached Caritas on Jan 3rd/07 who said that they would meet with me on
the fourth of January 2007. Ms.C.Z for the Caritas Health Group told me over
the phone that the reason why I was not able to reach them was because they
were away for the holiday.

On Jan 4th I had one quick meeting with Ms.C.Z at 11am, and another
meeting with Caritas at 12pm. (-I recorded the 11am and 12pm meetings.)

In the quick 11am meeting that I had with Ms.C.Z of Caritas I began in
confirming the time. NOTE; Ms.C.Z had reason to believe that I was recording
our conversation.

I then began to speak of the restrictions to gather evidence. I began in

warning Ms.C.Z that if the restrictions did not stop that I would have to seek
someone in power. The Extortion that Caritas were committing was failing to
matter since the loss of my Mother’s life did appear to be the next thing to
happen if I did not fight against their unwillingness to stop using my Mother’s
life as glue to hold their stained reputation together.

I was able to sense from Ms. C.Z. that she knew they let a bias be fed to their
security against me, and I sensed that she knew that their security banning me
was tragic, a heavy blow to my Mother’s life and a maul to my rights. I sensed
that Ms.C.Z was in fear that Caritas and her were in deep waters.
In the 11am meeting I named the restrictions nonsensical in order to record
that Ms. C.Z. knew. Ms.C.Z then said, "And I do apologize that thing’s were
done in my absence Shawn." After I marked the restrictions nonsensical I
confirmed that I was also speaking of both bans in saying; "No, I mean the
restrictions overall, all of the restrictions!" Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; " I
know you’ve made that clear !"

The Caritas Health Group knew that isolating my Mother from me was not a
light matter. - It is not like uninstalling software on a computer.

Ms.C.Z had reason to think I was recording. To deny the word nonsensical
Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; " but I do think that we need to meet today with
all parties so you can say why you feel like particularly Christmas that your
behaviour escalated as a result of your sister"

In that Ms.C.Z was seeking to have me appear uncertain towards or in

agreement with her use of the word behaviour and to have me appear
needing to account as if there was a further matter.

I then said; "Well my behaviour didn’t escalate, I was defending my rights

against a bias nurse that was siding with her" (did not honour the time
reserved) -Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said, "In the last five minutes !"

I then said; " Um, ya in the last five minutes after the nurse (already said) that
I had five minutes remaining"

I then said; "that didn’t make a grain of sense at all, there’s some strange bias
that is active against me and that is not right!" "

I then said; "And as for all these restrictions, I don’t see how the
administration could possibly be looking at all the information, you know the
information that I’ve given them, and still conclude that there should be
restrictions held against me, that doesn’t make any sense."

Ms.C.Z for Caritas who had reason to believe that I was recording our 11am
conversation then said, "That’s why we wanted to meet today shawn, ok! and
unfortunately that provoked you and you admitted that much to me on the
phone."

I then said; " Well I was not provoked, I was defending my rights and that was
for the protection of my Mother as well"

Of course Ms.C.Z knew all that. She was playing for the recorder. It is the
vicious circle game that I wrote of, also known as circulus in probando, where a
conclusion returns again and again spoken of as if it were a part of the
evidence to justify a lack of evidence or not any. This assumes the conclusion is
true yet does not show it to be and has the communication talking in circles,
and enables the twisting speaker to have the one in shock and forgetting.
Ms.C.Z then said; " You told me that you became angry with your (estranged)
sister"

Caritas reserved the time. Once the sibling was given the reminder that the
time was reserved she ought to have departed. The sibling did not yield to the
nurse and yet the nurse asked (me) to leave. Ms.C.Z for Caritas knowing that,
the question ought not to have been whether or not I was angry, the question
ought to have been why Caritas would let their security think that they had
the right to ban me when Caritas knew of the video recording’s proving the
first ban caused brutal harm to my Mother’s well being. The second question
ought to have been why Caritas’s security banned me the next morning
knowing that the nurse was in violation of my rights the day before on the
afternoon of Christmas day. The third question ought to have been why
Caritas’s security banned me when they had a report confirming that I shared 4
hours in peace with my Mother and served her well for all intensive purposes.

I then said; "No, I became upset",

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then for whatever unstable reason then said, "upset" as if
the concept was not an obvious one.

I then said; "The word upset is the word I want to use, and the hospital needs
to become familiar with that word ‘upset’, they think because someone is
upset that that means they are belligerent",

There remains approximately one minute of the recorded conversation before

Ms.C.Z sat up and gestured for us to leave. I did not transcribe the last minute
since I need an expert to make out the words that Ms.C.Z said in that last
minute, since we were talking at the same time.

After the quick 11am meeting I then walked down the two long halls passed the
cafeteria, and then went up the elevator to the seventh floor to see my Mother
who had not seen me in 10 days.

I saw a security guard appear to be hanging around my Mother’s room, and I

said to the guard that there should be no security watching me. The guard said
he would stay, I told him that he was causing further violations. Within seconds
the guard wandered off. While I uttered the few words to the guard I saw
peripherally some nurse who appeared to be sneaking a food tray out of my
Mother’s room while I was distracted talking to the guard.
When I walked in the room to see my Mother I witnessed that my Mother
appeared to be like one that waves of a tide washed up onto a shore. There
was a little container of yogurt that was half full while my Mother’s, clothes,
hands, and hair were covered in the other half. My Mother also was not able to
communicate. I was in horror knowing that the ban did trodden her spirit
under foot causing unseen damage to my Mother’s mind & body. I felt like I
needed to cry and get angry at the same time. I also witnessed a possible sign
of a struggle that happened some time after they isolated my Mother from me
since my Mother was favouring having her head to the right.

I walked to the food tray cart where the nurse escaped to when I was speaking
to the guard. I seen my Mother's tray with her name written on a little menu. It
was then that I witnessed that my Mother had not been fed nor given a thing
to drink.

I was witnessing this 78 days after my Mother had been under the care of
Caritas, and after two bans.

To not feed my Mother was gross neglect, and to not give my Mother a drink
was Criminal neglect since in not ensuring that my Mother was given a drink
was reckless disregard for her life and safety. I recorded the conversation that I
had with the nurse, and in that I am able to prove the matter.

thenonconformer.wordpress.com

Such murderous neglect has been seen in Alberta before;

http://elderadvocates.ca/pdf/deathbystarvationdehydration.pdf
I found that there were 4 beverages on the tray & not a single drink had been
touched, and not a single part of her food. I retrieved the tray and began to
give my Mother a drink, and while my Mother continued to sip from the cup she
drank in a way that truly did appear to be full of thirst. In that my Mother
drank both glasses of milk, and the apple juice, and she also ate all of the food
on her tray that I fed her. I did not remember a time that my Mother appeared
that thirsty. =

I knew that the matter was criminal neglect since in the least the hospital
had a duty to give my Mother her liquids even if they needed to use an I.V.

When the nurse entered the room I asked her of the matter while I recorded
our conversation and the account she gave me proved the criminal neglect.

The next thing that happened was that one of the

Head Guards walked in and said that I was to go to
the 12 pm meeting (early). The guard walked me to
the cafeteria, and then said we’ll sit and wait. I
then said to him that the ban was not right. He
then said; "well you have to be right about
everything."

I thought to myself; Is he saying that he is

willing to ban another to escape appearing ignorant
or as an escape for the facility if it does?

I say as Holy God as my witness that the one Head

Guard who works for Caritas said that.

In that the Guard for Caritas gave the message that he was willing to place reputations
before human life and rights. What the guard said gave a message of Extortion.
 T
Thhee n
neex
xtt p
paarrtt o
off tth
hiiss ttrru
ueeh hoorrrro
orr sstto
orryy
iiss tth
he Jan 4th07 12pm meeting with Carriitta
e Ja n 4 th 0 7 1 2p m m e eti n g w ith C a ass..

Alberta Health's Caritas board who had reason to believe that I was recording
our conversation began speaking of how I did not want security
accompaniment.

It was criminal deceit in them saying that, since if I said "no" I did not want
security accompaniment then it would appear in the recording as if security
accompaniment had been in place between the end of the first ban and the
start of the second ban.

I caught the deceiving and then said; "Well for the last few weeks they have
not assisted so it would be illogical for them to begin now, that would show
something unstable within the integrity of how thing’s are being designed, and
how thing’s are governed over, Even the Head security left not attending me"

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; "You know shawn what happened on the nurses
unit today have the nurses in concern because you became very angry."

I then began to remind forgetful Caritas that in entering the hospital after the
second fraudulent ban and then witnessing that my Mother was not given
liquids, not fed, while little life appeared to be holding her together that I had
good reason to be angry.

To act as if I did not have a reason to be angry was wicked, psychotic and
was the vicious circle game again.

The madness of that accusing is another example of Alberta Health's Caritas

agency committing Extortion.

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said that they were looking to the possibility that my
Mother was not hungry. Caritas failed reason in saying that since it did not
account for not giving my Mother a thing to drink. To prove further the fraud I
then said that since their hospital were reporting that they were not hearing
my Mother communicate with them that it was then not logical to simply think
that my Mother was not hungry. I then said that as I fed the food to my Mother
that she ate all of the food.

I then said; "My Mother needs her strength you know!" Ms.C.Z for Caritas then
said, "We all agree with that"
That was easy to agree with yet returning my Mother under the authority of
the Personal Directive and turning themselves in to Federal authorities to
face a trial for murderous fraud was not!

I then said that being banned (the day after Christmas) and 10 days later
witnessing all that I did was grieving grave.

On behalf of Alberta Health's Caritas board Ms.C.Z then said; "And I do

apologize for that shawn"

Alberta Health's Caritas agency were not sorry enough to confess that they
were committing a scandal and needed to turn themselves into Federal
authorities. They wanted my pity while they were murdering my elderly
Mother. That is like them saying; "please let us eat your loved-one, we are
hungry"

I then asked the question of why I had to ask security to leave when I went to
see my Mother 45 minutes before the 12pm meeting began.

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; "Shawn I talked to you on the phone and on the
nursing unit, and I did apologize. There was some confusion this morning. We
had requested a security visit today because it’s the first time you’ve been
back and people were a little uneasy because,"

I then said weary of their twisting; "uneasy, ya"

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; "The last time you were on the nursing unit your
voice was quite loud." (The last time was when the nurse was violating my
rights) I then said; "I have a very large vocal cavity.."

The talk of a loud voice was to deny that people may voice alarm. It was a
great provocation since it was manifest I had many reasons to be in alarm.
Talk of a loud voice was Extortion and the vicious circle game. Having a light
voice does not prove that one is gentle, a drop of poison does not weigh much,
and the wickedest lies fit into a whisper. Even a thief knows to keep his crimes
from being seen and heard.

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then began to speak of when the Charge Nurse did not
honor the time given to me the day before the ban . Ms.C.Z for Caritas said;
"The nurse at the desk did ask you to leave your visit 5 minutes early, she said
it would probably be better if you just go" -(They were not afraid of provoking
me but afraid of the sibling), and saying it would probably be better was
nevertheless to dishonor the time reserved.)

I then spoke of the Nov 11th video of the time of the notice that I let Caritas
see after the Nov 30th meeting. I spoke of that to remind forgetful Caritas
that the recording proves the nurses were false witnessing and that Caritas
were gathering insanely vague and baseless accusing from them. Ms.C.Z for
Caritas said; "That’s when Gordon and I met with you!"
Alberta Health's Caritas board had reason to believe that I was recording our
conversation and in the meeting Ms.C.Z then said; "I want to be clear Shawn
that we do (strongly apologize) for the delay in the response to your calls
because of the season, because of the way thing’s didn’t get moving."

That was said to act as if there was in any way any existing understanding that
we were sharing and is critical and damning evidence that Caritas had (Guilt
from) -being obviously caught not leaving my Mother and I in capable hands.

Ms C.Z for Caritas then said that the matter of my Mother’s diagnosis, and of
me was very complicated, - I was in shock when she spoke of my Mother’s
diagnosis and I did not know what she was talking about when she said 'my
Mother’s diagnosis'.

What they had secret was the diagnosis that my Mother was not able to
communicate and they also had secret that after November 30th they knew my
alarming and profound video recordings had proven that was false.

The Alberta Health agency knew they had a critical and vital legal duty to
return my Mother to my care under the authority of the Personal Directive. To
speak of a diagnosis in the meeting was to deny the Personal Directive, was to
deny the recordings that were critical and condemning, was to deny all I said
in the Nov 30th meeting and was to deny all that I wrote of in my Dec 18th
faxed letter.

I wrote of Dr. Grace E. Jackson and "The Perfect Murder" on the matter of
inducing dementia and I wrote of James Whitehouse writing of Governments,
systems & Doctors using brain-aging labels to dissolve malpractice crimes.

With that in mind, according to the March 12 Edition of the Journal of

Neuroscience -heavy stress, even short-term stress lasting days or weeks can
impair cell communications in the brains ability to learn and remember. Stress
activates molecules called corticotropin releasing hormones. That disrupts,
learning and memory. Learning and memory happen in synapses. The synapses
happen on branchlike protrusions on neurons called dendritic spines. Barams
Group did studies on animals proving that the release of C.R.H into the
hippocampus (The learning and memory center of the brain) led to the rapid
disintegration of these dendritic spines. This confirms that stress affects
memory, learning, and one’s ability to communicate. According to the Barams
Group report, in removing the C.R.H the spines seemed to grow back.

Alberta Health's Caritas agency that is guilty of conspiring to commit

"The Perfect Murder" were causing 'far more' than heavy stress to my Mother.

In the Jan 4th 12pm meeting Caritas then asked me if i would accept listening
to their securities account for why they banned me the morning after Christmas
day. (Have in mind the 11am meeting.)

Mr.D.D the security Head for Caritas is the one who began feigning to have an
account for their security. When Mr.D.D began to talk it was manifest that he
did not have a Justified nor sound account for the Christmas ban.

Mr.D.D for Caritas began to say that their security said that i was loud and
threatening to them.

In that Caritas were using accusing that was impossible to discern from. The
estranged sibling was told to return when the reserved time was done. She left
and then returned in a loud entrance to subvert the time. It was like a break-in
and to let the reserved time face trouble was to open my Mother’s care to
trouble. In the nurse letting it happen and threatening to to call security if I
did not leave she was committing Extortion and Fraud against the Personal
Directive and criminal neglect.

In defending my Mother it is logical to presume that I would have to ‘lift’ my

voice.

Mr.D.D for Caritas then said that Caritas won’t let anyone be disrupted within
the hospital. I then said; " Ok I need to address that once and for all, When a
person is protecting their Mother, and they have a Personal Directive over
their Mother, and their rights are being been violated, their Mother is upset,
they are being banned & it is upsetting the delicate balance of their
Mother’s care and things like that, when a person raises their voice it not
always because it is a form of noise pollution. When I raised my voice it was not
above the audible levels that came from both the nurse and.."

Using accusing such as to say I had a loud voice is another example of the
agency committing Extortion. - It is also a form of mind control since it was
to have all murderous and fraudulent crimes forgotten.

Mr.D.D for Caritas then said, "It won’t be tolerated" - I then said; "Well then it
won’t be tolerated towards the nursing staff that raised their voice on that
day!"

Though I appear to have spoken well, in the meeting I felt I had little to no
freedom of will. I felt numb and weakness when I spoke.
All that Caritas were saying in the meeting was and is a crime scene.
This was no "meeting of the minds".

(Mr.D.D for Caritas motioned to interrupt)I then said; "…you know that concerns
me, how is someone suppose to be upset…when a person is upset naturally it
should be expected that their voice should raise somewhat,…and if you
continue to pursue this line of argument then you’ll be contravening a very
basic human nature reality."

Mr.D.D for Caritas then said; " And when they get upset, and their audible level
raises within the hospital they will be escorted and asked to leave."

I then said; "…that’s not even a healthy way of thinking!" "What if someone’s
Mother died in the hospital, -would you say, ‘ I’m going to ban you from the
hospital because you raised your voice’?"

In the meeting Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; "Shawn we have agreed that your
sisters behaviour on Dec25th needs some addressing, and Dan and I will
formulate a letter that will go to her to tell her that that was not acceptable
behaviour and is not to be repeated , ok?"

First of all, It is a fallacy to act as if a relative is known when you only see the
relative a handful of times in a decade and in Caritas saying that they planned
before the meeting to address that person's behaviour only confirms further
that the nurse ought to have called security on the estranged sibling.

I then said; " That was a stumbling block set into motion from both your staff
(the nurse) and that estranged relative…"

Ms. C.Z for Caritas then said; " That was an unexpected event which we are
now reflecting on…we don’t want this repeated.

I then said in the meeting; "It has not been established that I’ve done anything
in error, and my words have all been sound…when this hospital actually has
something that’s definable and clear that I’ve done, please, we’ll place that on
the table, but that day has not happened!"

Caritas then manifested that they had been busy that day (the day of the great
tragedy that I seen after the murderous and fraudulent Christmas ban) seeking
for an auxiliary way to stain witness.

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; "We have documentation today from the
Edmonton City service that their investigation is ongoing, and they suggest
security assisted visits until their investigation is over"

In Caritas saying that it was Extortion in the form of Mischief.

My Mother was not held in their facility under any Warrant or Certificate.
They that took my Mother also did not have any search warrant after waiting
more than a week before knocking on my door.
 You do not hold people to hidden suspicions and nor do you take a loved-one
based on a hidden suspicion. You ask questions and the reason is that there is
what is known as "resemblance factors".

In many ways 'if' a call for redress is denied then any authority taken is illegal !!!

Adding to that is the Sillman test. They knew my Mother and I were
convalescing from being ill. Any word spoken against the (face) of that was in
violation of 24(2) of the Charter according to the Stillman test. The test speaks
to a report put together from the admission of testimony or anything gathered
in an unstable way. It may also be thought of as such admitting through a
violation to privacy, dignity or through causing fear of force.

Any Officer who knowingly sets into motion a false investigation in the least
violates section 140 of the Criminal Code.

I then said to Ms.C.Z; "Did you call the police or did they call you?"
-(A key Question-)

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said, "I called them for an update today because we
have not heard from them."

I then said; "So you called them and they said that, Now that’s very disturbing
to me that they did not say that until you called them Colleen, and that’s very
upsetting." "I’m going to consider that as being a contravention and a part of a
scandal that you called them !"

Ms.C.Z for Caritas then said; "Security actually called them"

Think of the contradiction!!! In Ms.C.Z for Alberta Health's Caritas Agency

(lying about who called), It proves they were conspiring a scandal against my
Mother and I and had been busy that day seeking for an auxiliary way to stain
my witness. These are principalities of Alberta Health that I caught lying !!!

If there was a true investigation and true belief in needing security to

accompany me then EPS would have called to instruct Caritas that day, not
Caritas calling to receive instruction. (Think of that logic!!!) It was 78 days
after my Mother was placed in their facility. It is impossible to believe that
on the (tragic) day that Caritas chose to call them that EPS also had it in
mind to call Caritas that day.

Ms. C.Z for Caritas then said that they explained to me before in the Nov
30th/06 meeting that there was an investigation into the estranged siblings
complaint. I then said to Ms. C.Z and the board that her words were not true
and I let them know that I had a recording of that meeting to prove it.

As you see I have caught Alberta Health's Caritas board lying when they
spoke of a phone-call and when they spoke of the time of the November
30th meeting. They were 'wishing' that any appearance of an investigation
would become Official while they were denying my Personal Directive and
Redress. The fraud is seen deeper in that they were doing this after they
became eye-witnesses of the recordings of my Mother that had the power to
extinguish any investigation if there had been one.

Although I have proven their crimes are much greater it is good to have in mind
that according to section 140 ; Every one commits public mischief who with the
intent to mislead causes a peace officer to enter into, or continue
an investigation - using a false statement that accuses or in doing anything or
omitting to do anything intended to cause some other person to be suspected
of having committed an offense.

In the meeting Ms.A.M the director of Medicine for Caritas then stated that
they warned me once not to record.

I then said; " Yes but I also explained about not jeopardizing her health,…I
know that I would be vulnerable to be victimized and my Mother as well in
some way if I had not, And all I know is that you asked me to not record and
I’ve asked you to not place my Mother in danger and it’s continued!"

Alberta Health's Caritas board spoke in a way that was like some form of
conversational hypnosis. I almost felt drunk talking to them and offended at
the same time.

Another lie condemning the board became manifest when Alberta Health's Ms.
C.Z. said that I was tied to their security since day one, when in truth
recordings and records prove I did not have to check in, did not have a single
guard check in on me and I was not under security accompaniment for the 78
days.

It was then that I said to Alberta Health's Ms.C.Z, " I think your words are
incriminating you and you don’t realize it at this point!"

Mr. G.S for Caritas then said; "I’m afraid, I have an appointment at the
Edmonton General, so I need to go."

Behold how Mr.G.S for Caritas began to exit stage left after I warned Ms.C.Z
that she was incriminating the board.

The way they were talking was cosmetic and the last few minutes of the
meeting began to sound like a bowl of nuts in a citadel of mad squirrels. I felt
half brainwashed while I tried to warn of the need for them to stop violating
the Rights of my Mother and I.

Before the meeting was stopped Ms. C.Z for the Caritas in madness began
saying again that the second ban happened because I was angry.

In saying that the agency were again committing Extortion in violation of the
Criminal Code.

I then said; " I was very controlled considering the circumstances !"
Ms. C.Z then said; "And I do understand that it was extremely unfortunate, but
your behaviour with the clinched fist and the loud voices, we asked you to
remove yourself from the nursing unit"

I then said; "clinched fist ?"

Mr. D.D for Caritas then said; "the security report does indicate that"

Behold that Alberta Health's Caritas board who did not witness a thing chose to
presume there was a clinched fist before telling me it was alleged and before
asking me what I had to day towards that. In that is another count of
Extortion and Criminal Conspiracy.

I then said; "That’s, that’s absolute nonsense, I was holding a candy wrapper in
my hand at the time."

They did not say I shook a fist, nor did they say that I raised a fist, and a closed
hand may be a covering for fear, or may be a simple transitory body
movement. Caritas and their security conspired with their security to use that
as a way to justify the ban since I told them that I recorded the time when I
spoke with their security and so they were afraid that if they falsely accused in
any other way that the recording would prove it false.

Mr.D.D & Ms.A.M for Caritas then suggested that we forget the past and that I
return to the one hour a day to be with my Mother.

Forgetting the past would be to forget my Rights and to forget the brutal harm
they were causing to my Mother, Their suggestion Is another count of
Extortion.

And that was the Jan 4th 2007 12pm Alberta Health Caritas board meeting.

After the meeting I went up to see my Mother where I noticed her grimace in
pain while her neck was gimped to one side. I then spoke to the desk clerk who
said that the nurse who had watched her did not report any neck injury. No
doubt since it was the same nurse that did not give my Mother a thing to drink
and who did not feed her.

The desk clerk denied my warning of the pain grimace while she was able to
see that my Mother’s neck was not straight. It was critical that I began
recording. I showed the attendant that my Mother did not want her neck
moved. The attendant then fired an insult in suggesting that my Mother was
resisting me because she wanted to take a nap.

To smite my warning while as the struck primer of a bullet concluding that I

was not sensitive was to commit Extortion since it was to take authority while
attacking my character. It was also criminal neglect.

The nurse then said that she saw a recorder in my pocket. Recording when
there are no marks & signs of neglect & abuse is not the same as recording
when there are.
I then went down to the first floor to tell Ms.C.Z for Caritas to ensure that my
Mother’s neck was looked at.

By the time I reached Ms.C.Z, Mr.D.D and Ms.A.M, the 3 of them had already
heard from the desk clerk and heard that I had recorded it.

I told the three Alberta Health hostage takers of the desk clerks words of abuse
& neglect that were spoken in front of my Mother, and I said that the desk
clerk was even laughing in a mock. Mr. D.D then said that he and Caritas would
deal with it. (I recorded those last few moments.)

The next day (Jan 5th) I received a couriered letter that barred me from
entering into the hospital. Caritas knew I had a mountain of evidence to put
together for the Public to examine and in that causing greater harm and
confusion was their great escape.

The plan was to document and communicate great nonsense

and so many partial truths that it would be impossible for me to
address it all and too much for the Public to swallow. In that I
would appear as a fool if I tried. I was left with letting them
continue murdering my Mother or appear as a fool trying to put
into words all that they were and are doing.

In the letter Caritas wrote accusing me of raising my voice to the desk clerk. Of
course, that was their way of justifying everything. If they threw my Mother in
with sharks their excuse would be that I raised my voice.

Saying that I had a loud voice was a great provocation since it was to deny that
people may voice alarm and it was manifest that I had many reasons to.
Writing of a loud voice was a Red Herring and is another count of Extortion.

In the letter they wrote as if they heard of the matter of the desk clerk ("after" I
left) when in truth we spoke of it on Jan 4th before I left.. The letter also
contained a Red Herring about video recording = A Red Herring is an irrelevant
matter used to divert.
The recording proves Caritas heard of the matter of the desk clerk and heard
from the desk clerk before I left on Jan 4th and yet the next morning in a
couriered letter Caritas barred me and acted as if they heard of and from the
desk clerk after I left.

I see the matter as much deeper than a crime of hostage taking. On the matter
of the letter Caritas again have committed fraudulent concealment in violation
of section 341 of the Criminal Code, unlawful confinement of my Mother in
violation of section 279(2)(a) of the Criminal Code, and have committed
Extortion according to the definition under sec 341(1) of the Criminal Code,
liable to imprisonment for life according to sec 341.1 (a) What name do I give
to their crimes?

Using accusing from the desk clerk that I had criminal evidence against Caritas
then wrote in the letter that my body stature was offensive. It was a bloody
lie, and is another count of Extortion. I am tall and did not use any offensive
body language. I have the recording of my conversation with the desk clerk and
nurse proving that I did not threaten either of them.

There was a clear pattern of Caritas using accusing that begins and ends in
closing the door to any other interpretation.

That Jan 5th07 couriered letter barring me also stated that there would be a
complaint to the Nurses union. Writing of the nurses union was to furnish
positions of accusing that were impossible to Justify and was to use the
Argumentum ad numerum fallacy. (Ref to Nov 11 Rec.) I also believe that the
nurses were sacrificing my Mother and I to escape cognitive dissonance.

Writing of the nurses union is another count of Extortion in what became

that day a hostage taking.

In that Alberta Health's Caritas agency have committed Criminal Conspiracy

in violation of sec. 465(1)(c) of the Criminal Code.

Every one who conspires with anyone to commit an

indictable offence is guilty of an indictable offence and
liable to the same punishment as the one that commits it

In light of all I have written against Caritas - in all

boldness I am adding section 465 (1)a that reads: every
one who conspires with any one to commit murder or
every one who conspires with any one to cause another
person to be murdered is guilty of an indictable offence,
and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life.
What I did not write of is that 8 days before the Jan 5th07 barring (within the
2nd ban) I found a Government Agency known as Protection for Persons in Care,
who I had begin an investigation against Caritas.

The one who has a Duty to watch that the Protection for Persons in Care
Agency does their duty under the Protection for Persons in Care Act is the
Minister of Seniors.

After reading all I have proven it is not hard to see that the Government
Offices and PPC whitewashed the investigation.

Before I tell of that part of the criminal scandal the following tells of a little
history against the so-called independent agency.

According to the Ombudsmans 41st Annual Report for April 1, 2007 to March 31,
2008 an alleged abuser in a protection for persons in Care (PPIC) investigation
complained the PPIC investigator failed to interview individuals who were
identified as being present during the reported incidents of abuse. The
Ombudsman ruled that the failure of the PPIC investigator to interview key
witnesses was administratively unfair since it raised concerns the resulting
decision was based on inadequate information. In another case the son of a
resident in an extended care facility complained about the results of an
investigation conducted by the protection for persons in Care (PPIC) program.
The son complained he did not receive information about the PPIC investigation
though he did receive a final written decision report. The Ombudsman found it
was administratively unfair. According to the Ombudsmans 39th Annual Report
for April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006 two investigations involving the Protection
for Persons in Care (PPIC) program were conducted where the Ombudsman
found administrative unfairness in the way PPIC issued decisions. In both
investigations, the Deputy Minister sent letters to all parties enclosing the
results of the PPIC investigation but there was no indication how he made the
decision. In one of the cases the Ombudsman recommended PPIC re-
investigate. In another investigation the Ombudsman found the complainant
had only a brief telephone conversation with the PPIC investigator during the
course of their investigation. The Ombudsman found that failed to give the
person a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

Now that you see that the Government's so-called independent protection
for persons in care agency is highly unstable, continue on.
The next part of this true story that I have to report will prove that the Caritas
Scandal has become a Provincial Mental Health Scandal that condemns the
Alberta Government.

When Protection for Persons in Care began the investigation against Caritas I
received a letter that had two dates on it. (Dec 29th06 on the first page and
Dec 30th 06 on the second page.) The first page contained the investigation file
# 5240, and contained a definition of the things that I sought to have PPC
investigate against Caritas with the Directors name E. Baraniecki’s signature on
the bottom of the page.

On the first page the PPC Director wrote that they were investigating the
charge that Caritas committed the lawless act of causing emotional harm to my
Mother from isolating her from me and causing her to cry.

The PPC investigation agency was given my December 18th fax to Caritas.

In that the evil PPC agency had to have known that they were investigating a
matter of unlawful confinement that is an indictable violation of the Criminal Code.

The Government's PPC agency had to have known that the banning was
Criminal Extortion and that the barring on Jan 5th was a hostage taking.

There is no other interpretation, and since I was named on my Mother’s

Personal Directive the Government's and it's agency had to have known that I
was having them investigate fraud against that Directive.

On that first page the Director then wrote that they were investigating the
matter of the nursing attendants intentionally committing neglect in not
changing my Mother and investigating to see if there were any reports of rashes
confirming my report.

On the second page was the confirmation that PPC received from me a tape
labeled the Caritas Scandal, and a second labeled tape, and a video labeled;
‘evidence of my Mother and I ‘.

I had given a report warning that a nurse spoke in a harmful way to me in front
of my Mom before Christmas day. I warned that the way the nurse had spoken
to me had my Mother in fear of that nurse and had my Mother in fear for me. I
also warned that on Christmas day a second nurse cut off part of the time that
Caritas had booked for me to be with my Mother.

In the Dec 29th/06 PPC letter E. Baraniecki the Director for Protection for
Persons in Care did not record those two matters.

I asked the Government's PPC Director Edith Baraniecki why she did not record
those things in the Dec 29th/2006 letter for the investigation and she said that
it did not need to be written for it to be investigated. I then said to her that in
not writing of it that she was having it appear as if I asked PPC to investigate
less than I did. Edith Baraniecki then told me not to worry that it would all be
investigated.
The first week of January I told the Government's PPC's Director Edith
Baraniecki of the 2nd ban and of the Jan 4th 2007 day and of the Jan 5th
barring the day after that. I also gave PPC the report that on Jan 4th after
brushing my Mother's teeth I witnessed her choking on the phlegm in her mouth
from the nurses not brushing her teeth.

I then asked Edith Baraniecki again why she was not recording what I was
telling her.

On Jan 12th 2007 I received a letter from Edith Baraniecki wherein she wrote
of what I was asking her and the Government to investigate yet written in
strange ways that had me questioning if they were documenting all that I was
telling them.

Through PPC I found out that Caritas were conjuring a guardianship application
against my Personal Directive.

PPC began there investigation acting as accomplices since I gave the agency
all they were in need of to see the story yet PPC were not following all that
my evidence was saying.

Another thing hidden from me is that two weeks after the barring began.
Caritas used hearsay from another estranged sibling to stain my witness while I
was having them under investigation.

There was one other sibling who was named on my Mother’s Directive, and that
sibling admitted to Caritas that I was the one who was caring for my Mother in
the year of 2006. The sibling chose to abort her right to act as a second agent
for my Mother. Indeed there is a profound difference between a son that shares
time with his elderly Mother each day and siblings that visit the Mother a few
days a year.

Caritas alleged that the sibling stated to Caritas on Jan 21st/07 that I said that
I was going to kill the nurses. Caritas used that (while I was having them under
investigation for murderous fraud.

The Alberta Health agency's fear was not for others, after all, they were
committing life-swallowing fear. The agency's fear was of being caught
stirring its recipe for murder against my Mother’s life.

Each day that passed the deceitful Caritas had the choice to either free my
Mom or to abuse and destroy her!

It failed reason for Caritas to believe I was going to kill the nurses after I had
an investigation begin against them. Also, how often do people become angry
with others, and say "I could just kill them?" Caritas being educated also had to
know that expressions of anger are often used like an emetic is used to induce
vomiting after one has been poisoned.
Many Canadian's and human's on the earth may also agree that if the system
were murdering their Parents that they would then be Justified in killing the
agency members and Doctors with the innocent blood on their hands.

Since the story is of an egg-shell matter and of brutal fraudulent

institutionalizing working to induce dementia what the Government and
Caritas agency were doing is not any less murderous and brutal than the
NAZI-BORN MK ULTRA experiments done on people.

Caritas also contained in their records that they had asked the sibling on Jan
21st/2007 when it was that I allegedly said that I was going to kill the nurses.
Caritas contained in their records that the sibling said that it was
approximately one month before. That then would have been approximately
December 21st 2006. In that Caritas had to have known that the words of the
sibling appeared false since it was not stable serving such a warning to Caritas
30 days late.

Caritas also had a telephone message recording of the sibling changing her
story saying that I did not say that I was going to kill the nurses, but that on or
around Dec 21st/06 that I said that I was going to kill her(the sibling) for
abandoning my Mother. In that Caritas had to have known that it appeared
the sibling was making up stories.

Also the brutal offenses that Caritas were continuing to commit against my
Mother and I would have triggered people who are (the least) combustible so it
was obvious that I am the kind of man that fights his battles using words.

Caritas also had in their records that they asked the sibling when the last time
was that the sibling had spoken to me, and the sibling said to them that she
was communicating with me only days before JAN 21st/07. Caritas then had to
have known that was another contrary thing the sibling said since the sibling
would not have given me a phone-call 30 days later if her words were credible.

In all of this is critical and damning evidence that Caritas did not believe that I
would go on a rampage, and yet used contradictory hearsay to stain my witness
while I was having them under investigation.

My report proving the agency conspiring to murder my Mother is real, it is

nothing short of paramount and not hearsay.

In spite of these facts that Caritas had hidden while I was having them under
investigation they assembled measures on Jan 24th/07, Jan 26th, Feb 12th, Feb
14th, & Feb 20th/07 to act as if there was a need to shield their facility!

This was massive defamation that I continue to suffer hurt from each time that
I think of it. Alberta’s Health's Caritas Agency also sought to sic Edmonton's
Police Service on me, (and the EPS Police refused.)

In that the Caritas Health Group and members of their Administration have
committed another count of Public Mischief in violation of sec. 140 of the
Criminal Code. (Remember the transcriptions from the recording of the last
part of the Jan 4th 12pm meeting.)
To ensure the Alberta Government were investigating ‘(with)’ ITS PPC -on JAN
11TH/ 2007 I journeyed to Alberta’s legislature building where I gave a
video of my Mother’s communications, an audio tape of the Nov 30th/06 board
meeting that I had with Caritas, and other recordings on that tape, and letters
to and from Caritas. The Health Minister’s name was Dave Hancock, and his
Administrative assistants name was Darla Cowdell. I had Ms. Cowdell give me
a receipt to prove I gave Hancock the recordings and records of the scandal.

On Jan 15th/07 I journeyed to Alberta’s legislature building again where I

gave the Minister of Senior’s Executive assistant all that I gave to the Minister
of Health. The Minister of Seniors name was Greg Melchin, and his executive
assistants name was Glenn Shepard. I had Mr. Shepard give me a receipt to
prove that I gave his office the recordings and records too.

On Feb 13th/07 I journeyed to Alberta’s legislature building again to give

the Minister of Seniors the (transcription) of the Nov 30th/06 meeting that I
had with Caritas. I had the legislature security give me a stamped copy of the
transcription to have a way of proving that the Minister of Seniors received it
for the PPC investigation. -The next day I faxed an overview of the
transcription to the Minister of Health.

On March 7th/07 I received a letter (dated March 2nd/07 ) from the MINISTER
OF HEALTH, who wrote acting as if he did not receive a video, audiotape and
other critical records, since he named the evidence that I gave him
(information), and thanked me for that.

Mr. Hancock then had it appear in his letter as if he did not have any
knowledge of the evidence that I gave his Office that his Office was in
possession of for 50 days to the time of his March letter.

Hancock then admitted in his letter that he understood that a PPC investigation
had begun and that his assistant Wendy Striver knew and that he knew that I
called Capital Health to investigate after I called PPC to.

It was on that March 7th day that I found the number to Edmonton's Mental
Health Patients Advocate Carol Robertson Baker who did an investigation
and found that Alberta Health's Caritas agency had not been holding my Mother
under a certificate, not held under the health act nor the police act. - Baker
told me that it was not her jurisdiction to help unless my Mother was held
under a certificate of authority. In that the so-called advocate gave the insane
message that if my Mother was being held in a way that was not authorized
that she was not able to help. What other reason failing and bizarre rules do
so-called advocates follow?
Before I tell more of what he wrote I need to tell of Capital Health who
were acting as if hearing that Caritas were committing a scandal was not
their business. Remember the great corruption I wrote of near the beginning
of this report towards the Premier & Alberta's Health Authorities.

Capital Health's High Offices said to me over the phone that Caritas has their
own board and that if Caritas members are guilty of an unlawful act that I
needed to report that to the Caritas board.

After that, Offices all the way up to Sheila Weatherall’s were closing their
doors and windows against communicating further. I called to speak to Sheila
Weatherall and to other High Office members and I was asked to hold and
then after a minute or two I received a dial tone.

I have faxes that I sent to the Regional Health Authorities (Capital Health) that
confirm that their High Offices said to me over the phone that the Caritas
has their own board.

Those faxes also confirm that those Regional Health Authority Offices said to
me over the phone that if Caritas members are guilty of a scandal that the
Caritas board need to handle it.

The faxes also confirm that I warned the Alberta Health High Offices that it
was the whole Caritas board who were committing a criminal scandal.

Stelmach's Health Minister Hancock then admitted in his letter that he

understood that I believed that Capital Health were operating in neglect,
and yet he then instructed me to seek the Ombudsman’s Office if I believed
that Capital Health were acting in neglect.

That was corrupt since all that I gave his Office was a Paramount criminal
matter, not a issue for the Ombudsman to put in one of his annual report
cards.

It was as if the Alberta Government was running from the

ARHA and that the ARHA was running from Caritas.

Stelmach's Health Minister Dave Hancock then stated in his letter that since I had
PPC to investigate Caritas and the Ombudsman to investigate Capital Health that
his Office would not be corresponding further.
On March 9th/07 I journeyed to Alberta’s legislature building again where I
gave the Minister of Health a two page letter warning him that all of the
recorded & written evidence that I gave to his Office was a matter of my
Mother’s life being in peril and of a scandal.

I had the legislature security give me a stamped copy of the letter to have a
way of proving the Minister of Health Dave Hancock received my letter.

I then faxed a copy of the legislature stamped letter to the Minister of

Seniors Greg Melchin, and faxed a copy to his PPC Director Edith Baraniecki.

While the PPC investigation continued I received no answer from the Minister of
Health, nor from the Minister of Senior’s. I called the Premiers Office to warn
that the Caritas Health Group were committing a scandal against my Mother’s
life, and I was told that the Premier Ed Stelmach would soon respond to me,
and yet Stelmach did not.

On March 23rd I journeyed to Alberta’s legislature building again where I

gave for the Minister of Seniors & Minister of Health the (transcriptions) of the
recordings of my Mother to those handling mail on the ground floor . I gave that
to quicken their knowledge of the recordings that they received on January
11th &15th 2007 (-I had the legislature security give me a stamped copy to
prove they received the recording transcriptions.)

I believe with all of my heart that the Alberta Government Offices, PPC agency
and Capital Health saw the distress that I was suffering (handicapping my
ability to write and prove what they were all doing.) -Many of the documents
that I had written (were not typed ,they were hand written), and the words
were written in (unstable alignments on the pages as from one who was
suffering distress), and (the pages contained (wording wrinkles as from one who
did not feel that they had the time to write.) It is evident in the way that I
wrote that I felt mauled and wearied.

On April 12th 2007 I then received a (PRE) report from PPC of the
investigation against Caritas. (Receiving a report 3.5 months later was
murderous & madness.)
They ought to have had my Mom returned to me according to my Mom’s
Personal Directive within days after PPC received the recordings & records from
me, and Premier Stelmach, Minister of Health, Minister of Seniors and Capital
Health ought to have been working together to have Caritas face a trial.

In the April 12th/07 report PPC began (in it’s own way) listing & defining
offenses that I testified to.

The way PPC were listing the offenses was as to pluck many critical and key
pages out a book before reading it to others.

I do not know if Elaine Sanders who began investigating Caritas had a part in
whitewashing the scandal. I do know that the Minister of Seniors, his Deputy
Minister and the Director for Protection for Persons in Care Edith Baraneicki
have each had a murderous part in whitewashing the scandal.

At the bottom of page one of the April 12th/07 report I was in shock and full of
confusion to see that PPC had written that Caritas diagnosed my Mother as
having dementia, and had written that although my Mother appears to lack
capacity that her Personal Directive had not been brought into effect.

Perhaps you the reader are able to feel the vicious circle happening in those
written words. They were denying evidence of ability traumatizing and ability
destroying harm while acting as if I did not want the Personal Directive
activated. That is like turning off water valves and then telling others that
there is nothing to drink.

In that all those with knowledge of all the records and recordings violated
section 430(1.1) of the Criminal Code in (a) altering the records that they had
towards all I was saying they were doing to my Mother and altering what I was
saying of the Personal Directive.

Since this was to place my Mother’s life in peril, those with knowledge from
Stelmach down are in violation of section 430(2) of the Criminal Code that
reads ; Everyone who commits mischief that causes actual danger to life is
guilty of an indictable offence & liable to imprisonment for life.

I was also in shock to see at the bottom of page 1 of the April 12th report that
PPC had written that Caritas diagnosed my Mother as having dementia and that
most of my Mother’s comments were indiscernible.

It was the (vicious) (circle game). It was a vicious game set to act in
willful blindness & willful deafness towards the November 30th meeting,
the December 18th fax, the recordings of my Mother communicating and the
recordings of her communicating only with me and confiding only in me.

It was also to act in willful blindness and willful deafness towards the
recordings of my Mother’s warning that they were causing trauma to her mind
and body in holding and handling her against her will. In that is another count
in violation of section 430(1.1), and 430(2) of the Criminal Code.
On the second page of the April 12th/07 PPC report, PPC admitted that they
examined my letter to the Minister of Health, 18 of my faxes, a video, and two
audiotapes that I gave them.

PPC were not telling the truth in writing that, since they did not write that a
part of those recordings was the November 30th 2006 board meeting that I had
with Caritas and recording of a nurse named Chris who said that he did not
have a bad experience with me.

On that second page of the April 12th/07 PPC report, it was written that my
Mother was not able to speak to the investigator due to dementia,

In that is another count in violation of section 430(1.1), and 430(2) of the

Criminal Code Since PPC had all that they were in need of to see why I said my
Mother not communicating and so (PPC) sought to (dissolve) Caritas of blame
for my Mother’s fear frozen state and deterioration.

On that second page of the April 12th/07 PPC report is also ‘smoking gun
evidence,’ in that PPC wrote that they witnessed in the recordings
pronouncements of my Mother (wanting me with her), (loving me), and
crying when I did appear.

PPC then wrote that my normal routine was to; visit my Mother several hours a
day which included the lunch hour. They wrote that I did that to feed my
Mother, take her for walks in the wheel chair, aid my Mother towards
incontinence issues, tooth brushing, and in to keep my Mothers mind strong &
in comfort.

In this is also ‘smoking gun evidence,’ since records confirm that I was
trusted to care for my Mother in all critical ways.

PPC then wrote on that second page that according to the records that I gave,
my Mother was emotionally harmed from the bans and her health of mind &
body was deteriorating from my not being there with her.

Do you see the vicious circle?

In that you see the Government's High Offices and PPC twisting and turning as
wicked bastards since PPC already wrote that they witnessed in the
recordings pronouncements of my Mother (wanting me with her), (loving me),
and crying when I did appear and so PPC ought to have concluded that they
had good reason to presume that the bans did harm and were harming my
Mother.

Smoking gun evidence is also seen on the second page in that PPC wrote that
they witnessed in the video recordings my Mother communicating with me,
saying that she loves me, and in tears saying that she had not seen me for so
long. In that the Government and PPC ought to have concluded that they had
good reason to presume that the bans did harm and were harming my Mother.
PPC were also darkening further in that they suppressed great knowledge of
many other recordings.

This is my Mother we are speaking of. Caritas had no right having her little
elderly life as their hostage & experiment, as it is written from the Latin; Fiat
experimentum in corpe vili, that is, Let the experiment be made on a body of
no value.

In January 2007 I called the Minister of Seniors Office to warn that his PPC
investigation did not appear stable since I had to 'wrestle' with his PPC
Director over the phone in order to have matters put in writing.

On Jan 30th/07 the Minister of Seniors Greg Melchin sent me a letter to say
that he was responsible for the PPC investigation, and that the investigation
would be thoroughly investigated.

Using the word "thoroughly" was his way of justifying the time that he was
devouring. The truth is that his plan was not to thoroughly investigate; His plan
as the newly appointed Minister of Seniors was to thoroughly whitewash the
PPC investigation. (Premier Ed Stelmach was the one who appointed him.)

Now towards page three of the April 12th/07 PPC report I must testify
against the social worker.

The truth is that I saw the worker three times in the 78 days before the
barring, and the first time that I saw this snake in the grass she used shock to
narrow my rights down, and that was not a communication, rather it was to
have me sign something. The second time was the day before the first ban
when I saw a look of happy hate on her face. The third time was on Dec
13th/06 when she spoke to me in front of my Mother saying that the hospital
did not have the time to keep my Mother from falling 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week.

I thank God that I caught the recording of the psycho social worker saying that.

PPC wrote that Caritas’s social worker Ms.J.B.M said to PPC that while my
Mother appeared to enjoy being with me that she appeared to smile more when
others were present. That was a wicked lie to confuse others into thinking that
my Mother was having flashbacks that had her questioning as if I was unworthy
of her fellowship.
Such a suggestion was fraud and criminal mischief and was contrary to the
recordings. PPC also seen & heard video recordings wherein my Mother and I
were sharing in laughter together. Laughter and joy is well beyond a smile.

I also gave the warning that my Mother in fear of their hold on her and handling
of her would act in a positive appearing negative reactivity like one who gives a
bone to a dog in order to keep from being bitten.

The next thing that PPC wrote on page 3 of the April 12th07 report was that
the Director, Manager, and Patient Relations Coordinator each gave the
account that they wanted my Mother to have visitors but that they had to ban
me to stop offences to their nurses.

The Government and PPC in writing that for Caritas acted as if I was a
(visitor) fighting for visitation and not fighting for the return of my Mother.
=Were all visitors her son, were all named on her Personal Directive, were
all named as her Power of Attorney, were all in each day for hours trusted
to nurse all of her critical needs, were all her care steward for 10 months?
Did any other soul have Paramount and damning recordings?

PPC also did not name what the offence was for any of the bans and were
acting as if the bans were Justified.

PPC also wrote in that part of the report that the Director, Manager, and
Patient Relations coordinator each confirmed each other’s statements.

It failed reason to have that written in the report since I warned PPC that the 3
of them were a part of the scandal - and so of course the 3 would act in
agreement with each other.
PPC then wrote that the acting physician was not able to attribute my Mothers
loss of strength & loss of speech on Jan 4th/07 to my being banned, and that
my Mothers losses to her health may be from dementia The physician also told
PPC that he could neither confirm nor refute that my Mother's loss of speech
and losses to her well-being was from Caritas isolating my Mother from me. In
that it appears that neither Caritas nor PPC told the physician of the
recordings, nor of the December 18th fax.

The physician did not once meet with me in 78 days and to this day I do not
have any idea of what he looks like.

In recording words for Caritas’s Director and Patient Relations Coordinator PPC
wrote on page 3 of their report in a way to have any possible reader of their
report think that my Mother was not in peril.- PPC wrote that I was banned not
to stop my Mother from any wrong-doing.

In Caritas writing in a way to suggest that disciplining my Mother is a

possible consideration reveals further my Mother's life in mortal peril.

That also speaks to the matter of the forcible confinement of the hostage
taking and of their own records of my Mother resisting their care.

PPC then wrote on page 3 that I warned that my Mother is fearful of having
strangers handling her incontinence.

Evidence that Caritas’s attendants did not change my Mother for hours is
found on page 5 of the PPC report where facility records revealed that my
Mother was continuing to have diaper rashes in the month of November.

PPC then wrote on page 3 of their April 12th/07 PPC report that Caritas’s
Director (said Caritas members & I had 3 meetings (and that my care concerns
were responded to.

I gave the recording and transcription of the first meeting to PPC,

(the Nov 30th/06 meeting and PPC did not write of that). The recording
proved that Caritas used extortion and indifference to deny my care concerns.
In PPC not reporting the meeting the Alberta
Government, Health system and PPC are accomplices to all of the crimes.

According to that investigator although Caritas’s Patient Care Manager stated

that my Mother was not left in the broda chair the investigator soon found that
to be false when on Jan 9th/07 the investigator witnessed that my Mother was
left in the broda chair for three and a half hours, proving that the Patient Care
Managers words were false. The investigator observed that 4 days after
Caritas barred me on January 5th.

On page 4 of their report PPC then wrote of my Mother being placed in a long-
term care facility and wrote that there was no legal decision maker to have the
authority to.

For Caritas, PPC wrote that "confusing message" set to commit fraud.

I do know that writing that was like barring me and then Caritas saying;
"there is no-one to tell us of her history".

"It is like turning off water valves and then telling others there is no water."

PPC then wrote that a nurse denied having spoken to me in an abusive way in
front of my Mother. PPC did not write that I gave a recording proving that
wasn’t true. PPC also did not write a thing of a Dec. 20th06 recording &
transcription of a male nurse who said that he did not ever have a bad
experience with me.

On page 4 PPC then gave a record from Caritas who lied in saying that on Jan
4th07 my Mother screamed when I awakened her that evening.

The lie was to have it appear as if my Mother & I are not near to each other,
and was to have it appear as if my Mother did not have her heart &soul
trampled on from the 10 day ban that began the day after Christmas.

The recordings of Jan 4th 2007 that I gave to PPC prove that my Mother did not
utter a sound that day. What is also contrary is that Caritas had PPC write that
my Mom was not easy to awaken that day and drowsy.
 DAMNING EVIDENCE

Caritas’s unit supervisor also gave the record that my Mothers health
declined considerably after being isolated from me the day after Christmas
and gave the record that my Mother had a blank stare (like one who had
given up hope) Caritas’s unit supervisor also gave the record that my
Mother formed a UT infection after being isolated from me.

Recordings of my Mother and a recorded statement of a Doctor from Christmas

also prove that my Mother’s wellness of mind & body while she was with me on
Christmas and after within the time of the 10 day ban were contrary.

What I seen after the 10 day Christmas ban was a horror. Far from the strength
that she had when she walked half the length of a football field on Dec1306.
PPC wrote of on page 5 according to records PPC gathered from Caritas.

On that Jan 4th day after the 10 day Christmas ban I found that my Mother did
not have the strength to walk an inch nor to stand, nor to utter a sound. On
that day I also found that the nurse had not given my Mother a thing to eat, nor
a thing to drink, and having an injured neck.

It was the next morning on Jan 5th that Caritas barred me for what they named
"raising my voice". - I did not see my Mother again after that.

On page 6 PPC wrote that Caritas had my Mother in the broda chair for four
hours on Christmas day because I wanted to wheel my Mother around. PPC did
not write that I gave them an audio recording proving that I went to the nurses
desk to place my Mother in bed and that the nurse said I had to wait until a
nurse was available. A half an hour had passed and so I undid the chair strap
and carried her to place her in the bed. When I began that day I asked an
attendant to adjust my Mother’s chair for comfort and to ensure circulation I
gave therapy to her back and feet throughout the four hours. My Mother was
able to laugh that day and even sang to me.
On page 6 PPC then wrote that they listened to the Jan 4th07 recording that I
gave them of my conversation with the registered nurse who did not feed my
Mother. PPC then wrote as if the nurse had given an account, yet PPC did not
report why the recording proves the nurse committed criminal neglect in not
giving my Mother a drink and in not feeding her.

The way PPC were turning a blind eye to evidence is like a man walking naked
downtown as if he had clothes on.

On page 6 PPC then wrote that they listened to the Jan 4th07 recording that I
gave them of my conversation with the desk clerk. PPC then wrote that I had
made "attempts" to warn that my Mother had harm to her neck. (PPC did not
report that the desk clerk first denied my first attempt.)

On page 7 PPC then wrote of my report that Caritas’s nurses had not been
brushing my Mother’s teeth. PPC excused the matter even though not brushing
my Mother’s teeth caused choking and opened her to the risk getting
pneumonia.

PPC then wrote that Caritas sought for council and moved my Mother near the
nurse’s station to ensure care. Talk of legal counsel shows their guilty mind,
and my Mother already had a room next to the nurse’s station.

On page 7 -PPC then in a vicious circle and contrary to all evidence & reason
wrote as if the banning and barring had been given an account and wrote that
my Mother had other relatives to visit her.

That condemns the Government, Health system and PPC since on page 3 PPC
contradicted that in writing that Caritas said my Mother did not appear to
recognize those relatives after I was barred.

Weighing in on that, another thing PPC wrote of on page 3 was that Caritas
knew I was the steward for my Mother and everyone knew I was the Power of
Attorney, and so they had to have known I was not just another relative.

On page 5 PPC also wrote of Gale resisting Caritas’s care and wrote that she
untied the straps to be out of the chair that the facility had her in. PPC also
wrote that Gale climbed over the bed rail setting off the bed alarm and that
when the nurses responded they found her sitting in the broda chair.

Contrary to the deceiving vegetable profile PPC wrote these three records
confirm will & agility. The records show that Gale was not a mindless vegetable
that they were holding! - Weighing in further, even I had trouble figuring out
how to undo the chair straps.

Corruption is proven further against the Minister and PPC on page 8 of their report.

On that page 8 PPC wrote that the matter of the November diaper rashes and
sore ear be dismissed since Caritas did treat that with Bazopro cream
after I warned them of that. I gave the report of the sore on the ear
and painful rashes, not the Caritas facility’s “highly trained medical team.”
http://elderadvocates.ca/pdf/bedsore.pdf
On page 8 PPC then wrote that the matter of my Mother falling while under the
watch of the social worker and nurses on Dec 13th06 be dismissed since there
was no way of proving that it was from neglect. My Mother fell only feet from
the nurse’s station while under the watch of a team of highly trained medical
staff.

What the Minister of Senior’s named a PPC investigation was a Tomb.

Their final PPC report was the same as their April 12th Pre-report.
The only difference was that they put it into 3 pages. Their report was
dated July 3rd 2007 that I received later that week.

Before that - I journeyed to the legislature on June 29th 2007 where I gave a
20 page letter to the Minister of Seniors, Minister of Health and Premier. I had
security give me a stamped copy to prove the Ministers received the letter.

The letter is truly key as is my December 18th 2006 fax to Caritas.

The letter is paramount since on page 8 I warned again that I am the one
who knows my Mother and who is able to interpret her needs.

On page 9 I asked how Caritas in their Nov 20th letter could thank me for
identifying a lack of safety in their Hospital's nursing practices and admit it
was a matter of ethics and yet while banning me claiming that I was in the
way. I was also never in the way since they only entered in the room for
seconds each hour. Saying that I was in the way was also like passengers
telling the Captain of a plane that he is in the way of the flight deck.

On page 11 I then warned against PPC writing for Caritas that I was a visitor
since it was to re-define my true identity. I wrote again the matter of
the recordings of my Mother proclaiming her will and I wrote that in their
desperation Caritas were trying to set into motion a witch-hunt.

The letter is paramount since on page 19 I wrote that Caritas were lying in
acting as if my Mother was at risk since they were trusting me to give my
Mother her medication and to serve all of her needs in their facility. On that
page I wrote that I said that before in my December 18th 2007 fax.

The letter is paramount since on page 20 I asked why criminal charges were
not being laid against Caritas and the letter is paramount since I asked why
my Personal Directive was not being activated and why my Mother was not
being released under that Directive.
On page 20 there is a legislature security stamp and signature confirming
that with the June 29th letter I gave a cassette tape with the recording of
the Jan 4th 11am and 12pm meetings that I had with Caritas and other
recordings.

That is damning and also damning since Alberta's Premier Stelmach and his
Minister's gave their 3-page fraudulent final report of their investigation
only 4 days later. (after receiving the mountain of recordings condemning
Caritas!) - The recordings proved that all that I testified of with respect to
Jan 4th was true. I wisely did not reveal that months before since I needed
to see in what ways that the High Offices and Caritas would lie. The people
of Canada and the world ought to be in great alarm that I have revealed this
much evidence against the Government of Canada. To be willing to commit
all of the crimes that they have the system is capable of committing any
crime. Remember, my elderly Mother has not seen me in over 4 years. I do
not even know where she is.

After I received the PPC report that the Minister of Senior’s whitewashed, I
warned him that I would not rest until I have him and the Stelmach
Government under arrest.

After the 7 month Government investigation Caritas then had me charged with
telephone harassment. Caritas failed to have me convicted yet did cause
further cruel distress to my life. The charge was an act of fraudulent
authorization and was to blind while Caritas set into motion a request to the
Courts to suspend my Personal Directive.

Caritas were using section 27(1)(d) of the Personal Directives Act wherein any
may request that the Courts test if a Personal Directive is lawful or to test if
one named on a Personal Directive is worthy to be named on a Personal
Directive.

The thing is that Caritas put in the request after ten months of unlawful
confinement, and after 10 months of what was a hostage taking, and it was
done to escort an illegal Guardianship application that was illegal because they
had the recordings proving it was against my Mothers right to life, security, will
& wishes. The guardianship application was also illegal since Caritas first had to
declare my Mother a Dependent Adult and had to do that free from committing
crimes that would cause my Mother to have to be named one.

Seeking a Guardianship application was against my Mother’s interests, in

violation of Division 2, part 8(1)(b) under persons eligible, of the Dependent
Adults Act. I am only telling of that to give that knowledge since in truth the
Government, Health system and PPC are guilty of committing the most serious
crimes written of in the criminal code.

Caritas also had to have known it was contrary to my Mother’s interests since
one month before I received the final PPC report I delivered on June 6th 2007 a
transcription of a 2005 recording of my Mother to Alberta’s legislature building
needlessly confirming that it was not my Mother’s will to be in a nursing facility.
I have a legislature stamped copy of the transcription that proves Stelmach’s
Government received that.

The request to the courts was done in the form of an Ex parte. Family Advocate
Louise Malenfant devoted her life to those who lost loved ones to false
allegations. Louise Malenfant also wrote of Ex-parte as having a bias vacuum,
and she referred to MLA leader Julius Yankowsky who also voiced concerns with
the Ex-parte. Malenfant once gave a 12-page report to condemn Edmonton’s
Police Child Abuse Unit for suspicion spurious investigations against parents.
Malenfant passed away in 2006.

On the Ex-parte order the Courts did not even spell my Mother’s name
correctly. (The Ex-parte through a Justice, S.Sanderman was permitted on
August 22 2007)

The illegal guardianship application was left hanging in limbo for 6 months
while Caritas continued holding my elderly Mom to their Misericordia facility
against her will.

When the day of the hearing began I was given 3 weeks to find a lawyer to
know what was happening and to have help proving that a scandal was being
committed.

Legal Aid who is funded by the province refused to give me a lawyer though I
warned it was a matter of life and death. The fraudulent and evil legal aid
board wrote that my matter was too complex and that they would not use tax
dollars for a matter that had little likeness of success.

On Feb 17th 2011 Tony Blais of the Court Bureau wrote confirming the fraud
and corruption of Edmonton's legal aid society in denying legal aid to poor and
handicapped people. The President Criminal Trial Lawyers’ Association
Deborah Hatch warned that six thousand disadvantaged Albertan's have been
denied full legal representation in nine months proving that there is not equal
access to justice in the province.

http://www.edmontonsun.com/news/edmonton/2011/02/17/17316721.html#/
news/edmonton/2011/02/17/pf-17316716.html
On the day of the hearing

the Court Justice named Marceau was not able to see passed his own
arrogance to hear all that I had to say. Each word that I spoke was like a
razor cutting into my heart. To speak for my Mother I had to wrestle against
the shock I was in. I did not know half of what Caritas’s lawyer was saying,
nor of what the lawyer for the perjury committing relative was saying to
gain the guardianship. The Justice denied key records and denied all of the
recordings and transcriptions that he had in a pile next to him. I would have
had more hope receiving Justice from Jabba the Hutt and his impish
laughing Ghoel than from this judge.

According to the Court transcription Caritas’s lawyer D. Mclaughlin stated that

there may have been medical staff and nurses who were in fear that they (the
nurses) were a part of an illegal act being committed against my Mother’s
Personal Directive.

In that, Caritas own lawyer confessed in Court that Caritas’s medical staff
were able to see that I may have been able to care for my Mother in ways that
were vital to her that the medical staff were not able to.

Judge Marceau ought to have seen that as condemning the Government

and health system.

(Note: that opening statement was even evidence against the false telephone
harassment charge !!!!!!!!!!!!!)

The deceitful lawyer for Caritas began to say that it was not until one month
after the 7 month PPC investigation against Caritas that I made an attempt to
formally activate my Mother’s Personal Directive. That was contrary to my
December 18th fax Caritas had in their possession. It was also to say that
Caritas did not see any sign or any evidence that I was calling them to return
my Mother to my care.

I met a group of people in the law library of the Provincial Court House who
said to me that when any are up against Mclaughlin then Government fraud is
being committed.

According to the Court transcription Caritas’s lawyer, ‘Mclaughlin’ then spoke

of a December 2005 Alberta hospital discharge summary record of my Mother
from the time when she gained her Personal Directive. He did that to suggest
that my Mother was not able to name me on a Personal Directive in 2005.

What the Government's lawyer did not say was that the discharge summary
confirmed my warnings of my Mother having an eggshell fear of nursing facilities.

What the lawyer also did not say is that a June 6th 2007 document that I
delivered to the legislature confirmed my Mother’s will & wishes within that facility
in December of 2005.
The Head of Psychiatry Doctor Brahim who wrote that discharge record is the
one that released my Mother to meet with a lawyer to gain a Personal
Directive, ((and I have a recording of my 2005 conversation with that Head of
Psychiatry to prove that.))

Whoso dig a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolls a stone, it
will turn on him. Proverbs 26:27

That Head of Psychiatry more than a year later gave a discharge summary for
Caritas that did not tell of that fact. That psychiatrist's fraud connects ARHA
fraud to Caritas. The ARHA Governs the Alberta Hospital.

They did not know I had that critical recording proving that the Head of
Psychiatry is the one that released my Mother to meet with a lawyer to gain a
Personal Directive. I did not remember to tell that to the lower court Judge
since I was in shock.

Caritas’s lawyer also did not answer to how they were claiming my Mother was
not able when the lawyer who my Mother met with in order to gain the
Personal Directive confirmed that my Mother was able.

The Government’s lawyer again was committing criminal fraud in questioning

the authority of my Mother’s Personal Directive since he did not tell the Judge
that according to the Discharge Summary the Head of Psychiatry did not
prescribe any medication for my Mother before leaving the facility.

According to the Court transcription I then warned the Judge that Caritas did
not give an account for any of the bans. D. Mclaughlin did not once give an
account in the Court-room and the corrupt judge did not ask him for one.

According to the Court transcription I then warned Justice Marceau that a part of
the evidence is a recording & transcription of one of the regular registered nurses
who stated that he did not ever have a bad experience with me. D. Mclaughlin did
not once give an account for that and Marceau did not ask him for one. In that is
further damning evidence that D.Mclaughlin for Caritas and Justice Marceau
committed fraud in their speechless denial of evidence.

According to the Court transcription I then warned Justice Marceau that each
of the Caritas bans followed after Caritas admitted to violating my rights and
followed after Caritas admitted to causing harm to my Mother in their care of
her. I then reminded Marceau that I submitted recordings to prove that.
Marceau committed fraud in denying his duty to examine and Judge the
matter.

The corrupt judge also was given the transcriptions of the recordings to witness
before that hearing. I then warned Justice Marceau that recordings &
transcriptions of Caritas’s nurses that I submitted would also prove acts of
fraud, abuse and criminal neglect. I then warned him that the recordings and
transcriptions of my Mother would also prove anything that needed to be
proven.
Recordings are like going back in time to see the truth.
In Justice Marceau denying that -confirms that the judge did not
want to see nor hear the truth.

In spite of there being recordings Justice Marceau continued in speechless

denial while he had the evidence sitting in a pile of envelopes next to him.

This was a scandal that I was warning of and that my Mother’s life was in peril.
There is no excuse for Justice Marceau denying the evidence even if Mclaughlin
and him were smoking weed in the court-room.

I then warned Justice Marceau that the PPC investigation against Caritas was
whitewashed, and I warned Marceau that the Government Offices denied
damning and life saving recordings.

I then warned Marceau that a statement from the Doctor contained within the
PPC report confirmed that even the Misericordia Doctor was not able to deny
that isolating my Mother from me may have caused trauma and other
psychiatric injury to her.

Justice Marceau after reading that part of the PPC report then in obese
arrogance and deluding gave a fraudulent interpretation for the Doctor who
was not in Court to testify.

Although the PPC report had within it the record of the Doctor stating that he
could neither confirm nor refute that my Mother’s decline in health was from
being isolated from me, Justice Marceau stated that what the Doctor meant
was that he had no comment.

In the judge giving the mortally perilous 'risky' careless interpretation for the
Doctor who was not in court to testify it is manifest that the Judge committed
murderous fraud.

Marceau also had to have known that since the (PPC report) was for an
investigation into my report of a fraudulent & murderous scandal that the
Minister of Seniors (the Crown) had a duty towards that statements in the
(Crowns) report were to be received in the form that they first appeared to be
in and not manipulated to appear to be saying something else.
Marceau then began to manifest his corrupt nature in a new way as he began to
accuse me of causing my Mother’s bruises. He did not ask me how she had
blemishes on her skin -rather he accused me, and in that Justice Marceau was
in violation of section 140 of the Criminal Code. Remember when Gale fell on
Dec 13th the social worker stated that the facility can’t stop my Mom from
falling 24 hrs a day.

Marceau had my affidavits and so knew I testified of an unknown illness that

weakened our immune systems for months that a Doctor prescribed an anti-
infection medication for. The somnolence from the illness caused times when
my Mother would fall. In that there was a question of my Mother’s
proprioception system failing (the system that provides a sense of ones own
limbs to have a stable sense of balance.) and a question of my Mother’s
vastibular system failing,. Both systems provide a sense of balance. The
vastibular system provides a sense of gravity and a sense of rotational
movement.

Even harmless accidental things that a natural stage was set for to happen
were being used to violate laws that Govern suspicion.

I gave Marceau an account towards a matter that would have satisfied any
unprejudiced mind seeking the truth. The account that I gave was towards
applying pressure to a locked mandible in order for there to be the ingestion of
an urgently needed oral medication. The need to do that caused a bruise on my
Mother’s cheek that others had no right saying was abuse.

The video & audio recordings of my Mother contained the power to prove that I
am my Mother’s greatest friend and that she was proclaiming her confidence in
my care of her. Justice Marceau is a criminal in not having the recordings seen
and listened to.

According to the Court transcription I proved that the estranged relatives

affidavit is false and littered with contradictions designed to assassinate my
character to gain the illegal guardianship. The Court transcription is critical
and damning evidence that the estranged relative violated section 140 of the
Criminal Code and committed perjury to gain the illegal guardianship.

The adversaries affidavits were like the Twilight Zone episode; The Monsters
Are Due on Maple Street, yet fraud, brutal mischief and perjury.

The Court transcription proves that all of my siblings had left my Mother (for
years) to live their own lives, and proves the siblings had been separated from
me for years. (To be in an estrangement one must betray, abandon, or desert
another.)

Justice Richard Marceau also committed fraud in naming me paranoid since he

did (after) I warned him that I have a report from a Registered Forensic Neuro-
Psychologists stating that I do not have any mental illness, nor personality
disorder.
Other damning evidence against Justice Marceau is when he said, " The bottom
line is that assuming I had such power and I don’t think I have it, I could direct
the hospital to return your Mother to you, to your care!"

When Marceau said the words, "I don’t think I have it" it proves that he had
doubt that he had the knowledge or doubt that he had the power to obey the
law. In that it is manifest that Justice Marceau did not have an impartial mind,
and in that Justice R. Marceau had a duty to not give the guardianship to the
estranged relative.

After Marceau gave his fraudulent and deadly ruling I sought to file an appeal. I
had to appeal if I was to have any hope of reaching my Mother to save her.

After Marceau gave the ruling in to the illegal guardianship I gathered a

telephone recording that proves further that the estranged relative lied to gain
the guardianship.

Even though I wrote to the estranged relative he has refused to communicate,

and refused to let me know where my Mother is. I have not seen my Mother in 4
years, and more of a terror is that my Mother has not seen me. I was always a
part of my Mother’s life, and I say as God as my witness that I am my Mothers
greatest friend.

While this evil was happening I had to work to prepare for the criminal hearing
to prove that Caritas’s telephone harassment charge was false and that it was a
part of their scandal. I had no criminal record other than a $150 fine for a
summary charge and even that was many years ago. I had to work to prepare
while I also was struggling to understand all that I had to do to appeal the
illegal guardianship that Caritas conjured.

Though Caritas used an army of darkness to have me charged with telephone

harassment- the Crown Prosecutors Office did not believe Alberta Health's
Caritas Agency and their great weight of sworn testimony.

After the Crown received what I had to say days before the court date hearing
the lawyer that I had told me that the Crown no longer believed Caritas.

Although the Crown did not believe Caritas the matter was too complex to
withdraw only days before the hearing.

The Crown then communicated an agreement with my lawyer and Caritas to

ask me if I would accept signing to keeping the peace with Caritas to stop the
charge that was a distraction. The reason the Crown was not able to ask Caritas
to agree to withdraw the charge is since it would be to ask Caritas to admit
that they committed a scandal in laying the charge.

When I was in court for the hearing the court judge asked me if I would accept
the plan. I said to the Judge that in accepting the plan I would not be in any
way admitting that I did a single thing wrong. I warned the Judge that Caritas
were committing a scandal and I said that if I was to accept the plan it would
be to lay aside the matter to be free of the distraction while I was preparing
for my appeal against the guardianship fraud.
The court judge then said that he was not saying that I did anything wrong, and
he said that all I had to say about a health care scandal may be true but that
he was only there to ask if I wanted to accept the plan. I then agreed to
accept it.

The false telephone harassment charge proves Caritas’s power to twist reality
and to even pull the strings of Edmonton’s Justice system against me like a puppet!

I gathered a recording of my conversation with my criminal lawyer for the false

charge. The recording proves there are those from the Crown Prosecutors
Office at the senior level who are of the opinion that Caritas committed a
scandal against my Mother and I. The lawyer Christian Banks was not unyielding
when I let him know I would be filing the recording as new evidence for my
appeal against the guardianship fraud.

That month I gathered a report from a Psychologist confirming recordings of my

Mother & I. The video and audio recordings of my Mother did not need a
confirmation from a Professional but I gained the confirmation since Justice R.
Marceau in fraud denied the need to have the recordings seen and heard in the
lower Court.-In that I had further new evidence to file.It was on June 10th/08
when I filed my factum and the new evidence.

When it may be a matter of life or death the amount of time that passes before
the appeal shows that the system is ruled by bloody madmen!

When the estranged relatives lawyer received my factum for the appeal on
June 10th/08 it was one month later that I received the lawyer’s factum on
"July’’ 10th/08 (C. Johnson). Within his factum the lawyer committed fraud in
accusing me again of things that I gave a sound account for in the lower court
and that I gave a sound account for in my factum.

In the factum the corrupt lawyer C. Johnson wrote that I did not serve Caritas
with a copy of my factum for Caritas to be a part of the appeal. The corrupt
lawyer also wrote that I did not ever apply for Guardianship.

I felt as if an abductor was saying that I jaywalked. I thought that once the
false authority of the illegal guardianship was transferred that I only had to
serve Johnson.

To serve Caritas so I would not lose the appeal based on a technicality I filed
for a hearing date set for Sept 4th 2008. I filed an affidavit on Sept 2nd 2008 to
serve to a Justice Watson and to Caritas’s lawyer. In Court Caritas’s lawyer said
that Caritas wanted to be excused from having to be apart of my appeal. On
Sept 8th 2008 Justice Watson served a 4-page report and ruled that Caritas did
not have to be a part of the appeal. I felt as if I was not able to see clearly
what was happening and as if everyone was getting their fiction the way they
wanted it.

In Justice Watson’s 4-page report he failed reason in repeating from C.

Johnson’s factum that I did not ever apply for guardianship.
Justice Watson had to have known, as Johnson had to that if I applied for
guardianship then I would have validated the estranged relatives guardianship
application that I warned was not legal. As I have written it was illegal since
none had any right declaring my Mother a dependent adult after causing
trauma and psychiatric injury through the criminal neglect, fraud and
hostage taking.

The next day on Sept 9th 2008 I filed a 4-page report to be given to Justice
Watson. In my report I warned Justice Watson that he had a duty to give an
account for why his 4-page report appeared to deny all that I had written of in
my Sept 2nd affidavit.

I received no written answer from Justice Watson.

On Sept 12th 2008 I filed a second letter to Justice Watson to warn him again
that he had a duty to give an account for why his 4-page report appeared to
deny all that I had written of in my Sept 2nd affidavit.

In that letter I also reminded Watson that on Sept 18 & 19 2008 I filed two
supplementary affidavits for the appeal. I wrote them in only days to spoon
feed the truth to Watson and to the appeal panel.

The two supplementary affidavits that I wrote also condemned Caritas’s lawyer
and the estranged sibling’s lawyer to Criminal Fraud. Again I received no
answer from Justice Watson.

On Sept 19th 2008 I filed a third letter to Justice Watson to warn again that he
had a duty to give an account for why he appeared to be committing fraud
against all that I had contained in my Sept 2nd 2008 affidavit. Again I received
no answer from Justice Watson.

There is also a matter of missing evidence that I have records of in a file. The
matter condemns another justice. I have damning evidence against 8 Judges
and Edmonton's Chief Justice who Harper's Justice Minister suspiciously told to
resign, and there are a couple of other judges who also need to be questioned.

On Sept 22nd 2008 I filed a third supplementary affidavit for the appeal.

On Oct 2nd 2008 I entered into Court for the appeal.

A panel of three Justices told me that I had 45 minutes to speak. In that people
should see that our justice system is mad. I would have to have been like
Superman to prove all that I needed to prove in 45 minutes.

In the 45 minutes I did prove that the estranged relative committed brutal
Malum non praesumitur breaching perjury to gain the guardianship. Remember this
sibling gave sworn affidavits saying that he only seen my Mother and I a handful
of times in a decade. In the 45 minutes I had also proven that the province of
Alberta committed all of the scandals that I have written of.
The panel had planned to hear me stumble and fall since I was given only
45 minutes to prove all things. (An evil & criminal amount of time reserved)
- Because I did what they did not believe possible in proving all that I did in
the 45 minutes the panel did not dare rule against me that day and so they
reserved their conspiring decision.

The next day I asked the appeal court for a copy of the transcription of all that
happened in court and I was told that they don’t give copies of that. I then said,
"well how do I apply to the Supreme Court if I need to if I can’t have a copy of the
transcription?" I said, "that gives the appeal courts the power to commit fraud" I
was then told that rules are rules.

On that Oct 3rd day I then faxed to the appeal panel a letter and copy of all that I
gave them and said to them in Court on Oct 2nd 2008. I did that to be able to
prove all that happened in Court.

The panel spent five days consuming time to write a ruling and then I
received the panels ruling on Oct 8th 2008. The ruling had me in horror since it
was one page that denied all that I had proven in the 45 minutes and the ruling
gave no account and in great fraud was written to have me appear crazy.

They also denied a report from a Neuro Forensic Psychologist that I submitted to
ensure that they did not conspire to bury and conceal the evidence by having me
appear crazy and put away. Any fool may see in the way I write that I am far from
out of my mind.

The report from the Psychologist stated; "On the administered battery of tests
Shawn scored well within normal on all variables from the T.M. test, the B.C.
test and the W.C.S. test, the three most brain-sensitive measures on the entire
battery." "On the BTA measure of divided attention Shawn scored a high-
average for his age, reflecting a strong ability to split his attention between two
simultaneous mental tasks. This indicates a well developed ability to cope
with mental multi tasking." "The clinical scale profile was consistently normal
with one notable exception of a very high elevation on a scale reflecting strong
feelings of suspiciousness and of being mistreated by others. (RXR) There
are no indications of any current mental health or personality disorder. He
does have a sense of suspicion towards the intentions of others and a
feeling of being persecuted and attacked by others which currently is not
associated with any indication of psychotic thought disturbance"

This is found on page 7 of my Sept 19th 2008 Supplementary affidavit marked

Exhibit A. - In denying this while writing a one-page ruling written to have me
appear crazy is damning evidence the panel is guilty of murderous fraud.

The Panel committed criminal Fraud and and Extortion in placing a publication
ban notice on their one page ruling. It is a thousand dollar fine if the publication
ban is breached. I wrote letting them know that putting a publication ban on the
scandal to cover their own crimes was extortion and I warned them that I would
find a way to have them face Justice for their part in the Government scandal.
On the day that I received the written ruling from the appeal counter I then went
up to the law library on 2nd floor. A lady who worked in there warned me that she
heard security was looking for me. That added to the shock I felt after reading the
horrific fraud of the panel's written ruling. I thought that it was a plan to take my
evidence and so I left out of the emergency exit door.

I now fear entering in to the courthouse and do not have any access to Justice.
The Federal Government were given files of the evidence and a likeness of the
report you are reading now. It was a Provincial scandal and now it is a Federal
scandal.

If they have the 45-minute Oct 2nd 2008 recording from the appeal it will also
prove to the world the Government crimes. Peter Costigan, Keith Ritter, and
Clifton O Brien have committed Criminal Fraud in the form of a Criminal
conspiracy. The names of the other justices again are Justice Jack Watson, Jean
Cote, Frans Slatter, Justice Richard Marceau and Justice Vital O Ouellet.

Among all others that are guilty those that committed the murderous scandal
from the Caritas Health Group are President of Caritas Patrick Dumelie, Colleen
Zimmel RN MN PRC, Sheli Murphy Vice President of Operations, Alison Morin
the Director of medicine and Geriatrics, Gordon Self the Vice President of Ethics
Mission and Spirituality, Steve Slater Security Manager, Daniel Deck Special
Constable & Security Supervisor, Lorne Stelmach the Patient Care Services
Manager of Medicine, Dennis Chaliisiox Social Services Misericordia, Jennifer
Bruno Mark Social Worker, The follow have also committed crimes and must face
a trial namely Doctor Dick, Sally Stuart Unit Supervisor, Charge Nurse Mary
Anne, Nurses (Lisa, Laura & Desk Clerk Darlene) Those that the Critical and
Damning evidence is against within the Protection for Persons in Care are
Director Edith Baraneicki, investigator Elaine Saunders. Those that the Critical
and Damning evidence is against within the Regional Health Authorities (Capital
Health) are President & Chief executive officer Sheila Weatherill, and the Director
of Public Affairs Mark Dickson. The Critical & Damning evidence is also against
Edmonton’s Public Guardians Office.