The Electromagnetic Spectrum: what you need to know: (Fig 12.2, 12.3)
In addition to being able to use c = νλ, you should be able to determine for different given types
of electromagnetic radiation:
Which has the longer (bigger) wavelength?
Which has the shorter (smaller) wavelength?
Which has the highest (greatest, largest) frequency?
Which has the lowest (smallest) frequency?
Know the Visible range: 400nm-700nm (0.4-0.7μm)
Know the names of the others (not the wavelength ranges)
Know the order: (inc. wavelength) : Gamma rays, X rays, UV, Visible, IR, Microwave, Radio
Know the short wavelength (higher frequency) end of the visible is BLUER
Know the long wavelength (lower frequency) end of the visible is REDDER
Quantized Radiation
1900: Max Planck explains the emission of blackbody radiation by proposing that energy could
only be absorbed or emitted by matter in discrete “quantized” amounts, corresponding to
“packets” of energy.
The energy of a packet of light energy is related to its frequency: E = h ν where h = 6.6 x10-34J.s
Cool bodies do not possess enough energy to oscillate at high frequencies so they cannot emit
UV, gamma and X-rays! This theory fits experimental data. Another useful equation: E = (hc)/λ
What do you notice about the size of h??
Evidence for Wavelike Nature of Light (image from Wikipedia - under 'Young's slits')
19th century: Thomas Young shows light behaves like waves, using a double-slit experiment. The
interference pattern produced was exactly that which would be made on a larger scale by water
waves. Waves interfere when they pass through one another: See Fig 12.7:
CONSTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE: Peaks, troughs coincide: Amplitudes ADD
DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE: One wave’s peak & other’s trough coincide: Amplitudes SUBTRACT
What is Light ?
Is light a wave or a particle? There is evidence for BOTH views of light!!
1924: Prince Lois de Broglie suggests: ALL matter has a wavelike aspect to it.
It also followed that: ALL waves can behave like they are particles.
This is called WAVE PARTICLE DUALITY. Light and matter are BOTH waves AND particles!
The result we get (wave or particle) depends on how we construct an experiment!
The wavelength of the dark lines in an absorption spectra and the bright lines in an emission
spectra are in the same places. EVERY ELEMENT has a UNIQUE set of lines!
We can use this to identify elements present in a sample
Bohr model of the Hydrogen Atom: (Fig 12.10): A minature “solar system”
•The closer the orbit to the nucleus, the lower its energy.
• ONLY certain orbits are allowed.
• To move an electron to an orbit further out, it must gain the equivalent extra amount of energy.
•The amount of energy is specific to the levels involved and is quantized –hence only certain
colors are seen in the spectra.
This only worked for very simple species like H, He2+, Li3+ ..with one electron.
Classical physics: this model is unstable. Planets aren’t charged ; the electron and nucleus are!
Rydberg Equation
ν=
c ⎛ 1 1 ⎞
Various sets of lines in Hydrogen’s spectrum were = R⎜ 2 2 ⎜ n1 < n 2
found by Balmer (visible), Lyman (UV) and others, λ ⎝ n1 n2 ⎠
and were named after them. Everyone had their
own equation to explain the lines: R = Rydberg constant = 3.29 × 1015 Hz
Johann Rydberg put it all together..
See Fig 12.12: deBroglie tried to tweak Bohrs model to view the electron in an orbit as a standing
wave... ...does explain the “special orbits”. Still doesn’t explain more complex spectra. Electrons
do NOT move in circular orbits!.
Here is a possible solution: It works a lot like a guitar string…nice sine curves!
CH301 Chapter 12 Notes: Part 2:
Figure 12.14 shows the energies, wavefunctions and square of the wavefunctions for the
first three solutions (n=1, n=2, n=3). In class we'll discuss the third one in detail.
Example: A ball mass 0.5g in a 1D box 2m long: What energy is needed to go from n=4 to n=7 ?
How many of each type (yes they get categorized), What they look like (plotted)
How many of each type exist
How they are ordered (in terms of energy)
What the shape means in terms of where the electrons are
(remember Ψ is a probability density - how likely we are to find that electron in that region)
The solutions are more complex than a 1-D or 3-D box! They are shown in Table 12.1
Notes: Atoms are spherical, so the math is done using polar* (r, θ, φ ) coordinates, not cartesian
(x,y,z) coordinates. The orbitals are solved two parts: Radial, R, and Angular, Y.
a0 (the Bohr radius) is a bunch of constants. a0 = ~52.9pm - roughly, the size of an H atom!
ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LEARN THEIR SHAPES AND THEIR QUANTUM NUMBERS!!
*Polar coordinates are similar to GPS coordinates: latitude, longitude and height above sea level.
4th quantum number? To explain the tiny deviations of predicted spectral lines from experimental
ones, a 4th one was needed – the spin quantum number ms. It was proposed by Goudsmit and
Uhlenbeck. Experimental evidence of electron “spin” was first detected by Stern and Gerlach.
Blackbody Radiation and the UV Catastrophe
Theoreticians could NOT reproduce this experimental data. The classical mechanics model
worked poorly at long wavelengths AND predicted infinite values at short wavelengths!
“The ultraviolet catastrophe” : Any body above absolute zero would be emitting vast amounts of
UV, gamma and X-rays! The solution came with a bold jump: the assumption that energy was
QUANTIZED. Only specific amounts of energy can be absorbed or emitted by matter.
Quantized Radiation
1900: Max Planck explains the emission of blackbody radiation by proposing that energy could
only be absorbed or emitted by matter in discrete “quantized” amounts, corresponding to
“packets” of energy.
The energy of a packet of light energy is related to its frequency: E = h ν where h = 6.6 x10-34J.s
Cool bodies do not possess enough energy to oscillate at high frequencies so they cannot emit
UV, gamma and X-rays! This theory fits experimental data. Another useful equation: E = (hc)/λ
What do you notice about the size of h??
Example: What is the energy of a single quanta of green light, wavelength 520nm?
Evidence for Wavelike Nature of Light (image from Wikipedia - under 'Young's slits')
19th century: Thomas Young shows light behaves like waves, using a double-slit experiment. The
interference pattern produced was exactly that which would be made on a larger scale by water
waves. Waves interfere when they pass through one another: See Fig 12.7:
CONSTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE: Peaks, troughs coincide: Amplitudes ADD
DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE: One wave’s peak & other’s trough coincide: Amplitudes SUBTRACT
What is Light ?
Is light a wave or a particle? There is evidence for BOTH views of light!!
1924: Prince Lois de Broglie suggests: ALL matter has a wavelike aspect to it.
It also followed that: ALL waves can behave like they are particles.
This is called WAVE PARTICLE DUALITY. Light and matter are BOTH waves AND particles!
The result we get (wave or particle) depends on how we construct an experiment!
The wavelength of the dark lines in an absorption spectra and the bright lines in an emission
spectra are in the same places. EVERY ELEMENT has a UNIQUE set of lines!
We can use this to identify elements present in a sample
Bohr model of the Hydrogen Atom: (Fig 12.10): A minature “solar system”
•The closer the orbit to the nucleus, the lower its energy.
• ONLY certain orbits are allowed.
• To move an electron to an orbit further out, it must gain the equivalent extra amount of energy.
•The amount of energy is specific to the levels involved and is quantized –hence only certain
colors are seen in the spectra.
This only worked for very simple species like H, He2+, Li3+ ..with one electron.
Classical physics: this model is unstable. Planets aren’t charged ; the electron and nucleus are!
Rydberg Equation
ν=
c ⎛ 1 1 ⎞
Various sets of lines in Hydrogen’s spectrum were = R⎜ 2 2 ⎜ n1 < n 2
found by Balmer (visible), Lyman (UV) and others, λ ⎝ n1 n2 ⎠
and were named after them. Everyone had their
own equation to explain the lines: R = Rydberg constant = 3.29 × 1015 Hz
Johann Rydberg put it all together..
Example: Find the λ of the second emission line in the Balmer series. (See Fig 12.10, the green
arrow) Look at the diagram: which two energy levels is this transition going between?
See Fig 12.12: deBroglie tried to tweak Bohrs model to view the electron in an orbit as a standing
wave... ...does explain the “special orbits”. Still doesn’t explain more complex spectra. Electrons
do NOT move in circular orbits!.
Example 1: Imagine we know that electron is moving in an atom at half the speed of light with an
error of 0.5%, what is the error in its position?
Example 2: Imagine we know that a 0.22 caliber bullet of mass 3.89 x 10-3 kg is moving at 395
m/s with an error of with an error of 0.5%, what is the error in its position?
How to interpret Ψ
Max Born: The value of the square of Ψ (i.e., Ψ2) for some point in space is proportional to the
probability* of finding the particle in that region of space. If we square any function, certain things
happen. For example, if f(x) at some value of x is negative, then [f(x)]2 has to be positive.
If Ψ2 = zero at some region we say we are at a NODE. The particle will NEVER be found there.
*Probability: For a good chance of winning, you look for a game with a high probability of your
desired result (e.g. lottery number) occurring.
Here is a possible solution: It works a lot like a guitar string…nice sine curves!
CH301 Chapter 12 Notes: Part 2:
Figure 12.14 shows the energies, wavefunctions and square of the wavefunctions for the
first three solutions (n=1, n=2, n=3). In class we'll discuss the third one in detail.
Example: A ball mass 0.5g in a 1D box 2m long: What energy is needed to go from n=4 to n=7 ?
The solutions are more complex than a 1-D or 3-D box! They are shown in Table 12.1
Notes: Atoms are spherical, so the math is done using polar* (r, θ, φ ) coordinates, not cartesian
(x,y,z) coordinates. The orbitals are solved two parts: Radial, R, and Angular, Y.
a0 (the Bohr radius) is a bunch of constants. a0 = ~52.9pm - roughly, the size of an H atom!
*Polar coordinates are similar to GPS coordinates: latitude, longitude and height above sea level.
4th quantum number? To explain the tiny deviations of predicted spectral lines from experimental
ones, a 4th one was needed – the spin quantum number ms. It was proposed by Goudsmit and
Uhlenbeck. Experimental evidence of electron “spin” was first detected by Stern and Gerlach.
Note: Remember the SI Unit conversions too!