Spain
is
highly
dependent
on
energy
imports.
According
to
EUROSTAT
during
2009
87.7%
of
its
primary
energy
came
from
external
countries
and
it
ranks
6th
in
the
imports
of
coal,
oil
and
gas,
3rd
in
the
imports
of
gas
in
the
European
Union
and
is
the
largest
importer
of
liquefied
natural
gas
in
the
world.
Even
further,
89.2%
of
its
oil
and
gas
imports
come
from
countries
with
very
unstable
governments,
most
of
them
located
in
the
North
of
Africa
and
middle
east,
50%
of
the
gas
imports,
come
from
Algeria
and
Egypt,
so
any
dramatic
change
in
the
political
situation
of
any
of
these
countries
and
consequently
on
the
fuel
supply,
could
affect
dramatically
the
Spanish
economy.
The
situation
within
the
European
Union
(EU)
is
not
as
drastic,
but
quite
similar;
in
2008,
54.8%
of
their
energy
consumption
came
from
imported
sources,
while
two
thirds
of
these
imports
come
from
Russia
and
the
Middle
East
countries.
At
the
same
time,
the
EU
ratified
the
Kyoto
protocol,
committing
to
a
reduction
in
their
green
house
gas
emissions.
Spain
as
a
member
of
the
EU
also
has
to
comply
with
an
emission
cap
of
greenhouse
gasses.
So,
continuing
with
the
use
fossil
fuels
does
not
seem
like
a
feasible
option
neither
for
the
EU
or
Spain.
In
1997,
the
European
commission
published
“The
White
Book”
for
a
strategy
and
community
action
plan
on
Renewable
Energy
Sources
(RES).
With
the
objective
of
supporting
it,
in
2001
The
European
parliament
and
council
approved
the
“Directive
2001/77/EC
of
on
the
promotion
of
electricity
from
renewable
energy
sources
in
the
internal
electricity
market
“
which
set
a
target
of
12%
of
gross
inland
energy
consumption
from
renewables
for
the
EU-‐15
by
2010,
of
which
electricity
would
represent
21%.
In
order
to
comply
with
this
commitment
the
Spanish
Government
developed
the
Promotion
Plan
for
Renewable
Energy
2000-‐2010
by
the
end
of
2004
the
gross
inland
energy
consumption
from
RES
reached
only
6.5%
being
30%
of
this
generation
due
to
hydroelectric
power
that
had
been
installed
previously
to
the
plan.
To
be
able
to
comply
with
the
2010
commitment,
the
Spanish
Ministry
of
Development
made
a
review
of
the
plan
presenting
the
new
Renewable
Energy
Plan
(REP)
for
2005-‐2010
giving
more
incentives
to
the
industries
to
increase
the
RES
generation,
by
2010,
RES
accounted
for
12.2%
of
the
gross
inland
energy
consumption
and
25,1
%
of
electricity
was
generated
through
RES,
carrying
on
a
great
development
of
the
Wind
and
Solar
Photovoltaic
industries,
which
became
a
world
reference
in
their
fields.
The
increase
in
RES
happened
specially,
during
2007
and
2008
being
more
steady,
in
the
case
of
Wind
Power
industry
than
in
the
Photovoltaic
industry,
the
Spanish
Government
changed
the
regulatory
framework
several
times
in
order
to
increase
the
interest
of
investors
towards
this
new
technologies;
creating
a
special
regime
for
electricity
produced
from
renewable
sources
and
presenting
feed
in
tariff
reforms.
During
the
last
two
years,
some
of
those
incentives
have
been
modified,
creating
a
downturn
in
some
sectors
of
the
Renewable
Energy
Industry.
During
2009,
the
European
Parliament
and
the
Council
approved
Directive
2009/28/EC
on
the
promotion
of
the
use
of
energy
from
renewable
sources
and
amending
and
subsequently
repealing
Directive
2001/77/EC.
According
to
the
targets
set
in
this
Directive,
by
2020,
the
20%
of
the
gross
energy
consumption
in
Spain,
will
have
to
be
from
RES
and
the
share
of
energy
from
RES
in
the
transport
sector
must
amount
to
at
least
10
%.
The
Directive
established
that
each
Member
State
had
to
prepare
a
National
Action
Plan
for
Renewable
Energy
Sources
(NAPRES),
Spain
already
prepared
a
draft
of
this
document
which
is
right
now
under
review,
the
targets
set
for
the
time
being
are
22.7%
of
RES
for
the
total
energy
consumption
and
13.6%
of
RES
for
the
total
energy
used
for
transportation
History
of
RES
regulatory
framework
(1)
The
Spanish
Government
had
to
develop
a
regulatory
framework
with
clear
incentives
in
order
to
promote
the
use
of
RES
in
Spain.
1. Law
of
the
Electricity
Sector
(Law
54/97)
provides
the
basic
framework
for
Renewable
Energy
Sources
for
Electricity
(RESE).
• It
establishes
a
‘‘Special
Regime’’
(different
from
the
conventional,
‘‘Ordinary
Regime’’),
in
which
RESE
is
given
a
special
treatment.,
which
was
later
on
developed
by
Royal
Decree
2818/1998.
• Guaranteed
grid
access
for
RES-‐E
producers.
• Price
support
for
RES-‐E
producers.
RES-‐E
plants
less
than
10MW
will
receive
a
premium
set
by
the
government
(art.30.4).
The
price
of
electricity
paid
to
these
plants
would
be
within
a
range
of
80–90%
of
the
average
electricity
price.
2. Royal
Decree
on
Special
Regime
(RD
2818/1998)
RES-‐E
generators
could
choose
between
two
alternatives;
A
fixed
premium
on
top
of
the
electricity
market
price
or
a
fixed
total
price
(fixed
feed-‐in).
Generators
supplied
the
electricity
to
the
distributor,
who
paid
the
premiums
but
passed
these
to
the
Energy
National
Commission
(CNE)
and,
finally,
to
the
end
consumer.
3. Royal
Decree
436/2004:
RES
generators
may
sell
their
electricity
to
distributors
or
directly
to
the
market.
In
both
cases,
support
is
tied
to
the
average
electricity
tariff
(AET).
4. Royal
Decree
661/2007:
Decouples
RES
support
from
the
AET
updating
it
to
the
Consumer
Price
Index
(CPI).
A
cap
and
floor
system
for
RES
support
levels
is
implemented.
At
the
moment
of
implementing
a
Feed
In
tariff
System
(FIT)
system
in
1997;
there
were
three
possible
options,
the
FIT,
a
tendering/bidding
system,
or
a
combination
of
both
depending
on
the
technology.
Countries
with
a
big
influence
in
the
Spanish
policy
such
as
Germany,
had
already
implemented
an
FIT
system
and
others
like
Denmark,
had
a
combination
depending
on
the
technology
(tender
for
off-‐shore
wind
and
FIT
for
others),
Spain
opted
for
an
FIT
system.
RES-‐E
generators
saw
the
FIT
reform
with
good
eyes,
as
it
would
give
them
a
warranty
that
they
could
sell
the
electricity
they
generated
at
a
higher
price
even
if
electricity
prices
fell
and
social
and
political
opposition
was
regarded
as
unlikely
as
the
increase
RESE
would
carry
on
more
employment
and
environmental
benefits
(Spain
unemployment
rates
(1)
Some
of
the
conclusions
written
have
been
taken
from
the
article
“Ten
years
of
renewable
electricity
policies
in
Spain:
An
analysis
of
successive
feed-‐in
tariff-‐reforms”
by
Pablo
del
Rio,
October
2007
at
that
time
were
more
than
double
than
the
EU-‐15
average).
With
regards
to
the
end
consumer
they
would
be
unlikely
to
complain
as
the
increase
in
the
electricity
bill
would
not
be
too
high,
at
least
initially
(due
to
the
low
%
of
RES-‐E
at
the
beginning)
and
most
of
them
ignored
how
much
they
were
paying
on
their
electricity
bills
(Hernandez,
2008)
and
at
the
same
time,
even
if
they
knew
they
would
be
unlikely
to
make
noise
and
organize
against
the
system,
general
press
focuses
more
on
the
environmental
impact
of
the
RES-‐E
paying
special
attention
on
CO2
emissions
and
specialized
economic
press
has
a
much
lower
number
of
readers
(according
to
the
General
Survey
on
Media
Sources,
GEM
2007,
general
newspapers
had
15
million
readers
while
specialized
economic
press
only
226,000
readers).
The
successive
reforms
with
RD
436/2004
and
RD
661/2007,
had
two
main
goals;
encourage
RESE
investment
(given
its
alleged
benefits)
but
without
leading
to
an
excessive
windfall
profits
for
RES-‐E
generators
and
an
unbearable
financial
burden
for
consumers.
That
is
why,
the
government
decided
to
review
annually
the
prices,
at
which
electricity
would
be
sold
to
RES-‐E.
A
system
setting
long-‐term
support
could
trap
the
government
into
the
decision
with
an
excessive
support
level
in
the
future.
But,
according
to
a
statement
in
2002
and
2003
from
the
Renewable
Energy
Producers
Association
(APPA)
it
was
regarded
as
a
major
drawback
of
the
system,
not
knowing
what
the
revenue
would
be
during
the
lifetime
of
the
plant
was
considered
a
significant
risk
for
investors.
The
Spanish
Government
approved
the
REP
2000-‐2005,
with
the
goal
of
achieving
12,1
%
of
the
primary
energy
from
RES,
30,3
%
of
the
total
electricity
consumption
from
RESE,
and
5,83
%
from
the
total
gasoline
and
diesel
consumption
from
biofuels.
In
order
to
achieve
those
targets
they
approved
a
package
of
financial
incentives
for
each
kind
of
RES
technology
shown
on
the
table
below.
Thousands
Period
2005-‐2010
Euros
Electric
bonuses
Tax
Incentives
Investment
Public
Technology
area
FIT
(all
the
Exemption
Special
Total
aid
period)
Taxes
Hydroelectric
950.063
0
189.062
0
Wind
11.756.391
0
2.598.870
0
Biomass
Industrial
Thermal
54.577
0
0
0
Biomass
Domestic
Thermal
710.097
284.039
0
0
Biomass
Electricity
Applications
1.964.596
0
1.059.922
0
Biofuels
1.156.830
0
0
2.855.095
Biogas
Electricity
Applications
119.658
0
49.425
0
Solar
Thermal
2.684.611
348.078
0
0
Solar
Thermoelectric
2.162.500
6.200
559.514
0
Solar
Photovoltaic
(Standalone)
165.107
36.324
0
Solar
Photovoltaic
(Grid
connected)
1.874.211
6.299
499.415
0
TOTAL
23.598.641
680.940
4.956.208
2.855.095
Source:
“Study
on
renewable
energies
in
Spain
Recommendations
for
strategic
guidelines
after
2006,
developed
by
DGICO
consulting,
CE160AT024”
Development
of
RES
industry
(2)
Due
to
the
favorable
regulatory
framework
and
the
financial
incentives
set
up
in
the
REP
2005-‐2010,
the
Spanish
RES
industry
had
a
great
development
in
the
last
years,
by
2009:
• Created
59,303
direct
jobs
and
indirectly
40,547
jobs
in
other
sectors,
even
though
20,00
jobs
were
lost
in
comparison
with
2008
mainly
in
the
photovoltaic
sector.
• Contributed
directly
to
the
Spanish
Gross
Domestic
Product
(GDP)
with
6,170.5
Million
Euros,
indirectly
2,355.1
Million
Euros
were
generated.
This
had
a
total
contribution
to
the
Spanish
GDP
of
0.81
%.
• Decreased
the
import
of
fossil
fuels
in
10.7
Million
Petroleum
Equivalent
Tons
(PET)
for
a
value
of
2,137
Million
Euros,
affecting
in
a
positive
way
the
Spanish
GDP
in
around
0.2%.
• Exports
amounted
a
total
3,014.6
Million
Euros.
• They
decreased
28.5
million
tons
of
CO2
emissions
and
a
total
of
113
million
tons
of
CO2
in
the
accumulated
period
from
2005
till
2009,
saving
374.7
million
euros
in
2009
considering
a
price
of
the
ton
of
CO2
of
13
Euros/ton.
• The
use
of
RES
decreased
the
emissions
of
Nitrogen
oxides
(NOx)
and
Sulfur
Oxides
(SOx)
having
a
positive
effect
on
the
health
of
the
Spanish
Citizens
saving
982
thousand
days
of
life
and
avoiding
an
expense
from
the
social
Security
of
148
Million
Euros.
Biofuels
The
Ministry
of
Industry,
Tourism
and
Trade
issued
a
Ministerial
Order
ITC
2877/2008
establishing
a
mechanism
to
promote
the
use
of
biofuels
and
other
renewable
fuels
for
the
transportation
sector.
According
to
this
ministerial
order,
the
petroleum
operators
had
to
certify
the
substitution
in
2009
of
3.4%
of
the
gasoline
and
diesel
fuels
for
biofuels
and
4.78%
in
2010.
This
target
was
accomplished,
as
it
was
cheaper
for
the
petroleum
operators
to
consume
these
fuels,
than
paying
the
fines,
0.2
million
Tons
of
Bioethanol
and
1
million
Ton
of
Biodiesel
were
consumed
during
2009.
Spain
had
enough
production
capacity
to
cover
the
demand
of
biofuels
but
as
international
Biodiesel
prices
declined,
it
was
cheaper
for
the
petroleum
operators
to
import
it,
than
consuming
the
local
one,
so
29%
of
the
Biodiesel
consumed
came
from
other
countries
like
the
United
States
or
Argentina,
while
75%
of
the
Biodiesel
Spanish
production
plants
were
not
in
operation
and
only
covered
71%
of
the
consumption.
With
regards
to
Bioethanol
the
production
was
higher
than
the
consumption
so
130,000
tons
were
exported
to
other
countries.
Biofuels
had
a
contribution
to
the
Spanish
GDP
in
2009
of
209.1
Million
Euros
in
a
direct
way
and
141.1
Million
Euros
in
an
indirect
way
making
a
total
contribution
of
350
Million
Euros.
(2)
Macroeconomic
study
of
the
impact
of
RES
in
Spain,
APPA,
developed
by
Deloitte,
2009
Bonus
in
the
electricity
tariff
In
the
last
years
the
Photovoltaic
industry
had
a
great
development,
decreasing
significantly
the
cost
to
produce
electricity
through
this
technology.
Cost
of
Photovoltaic
panels
(€/KWp)
Cost
of
investment
(M€/MW)
Source:
Spanish
Ministry
of
Industry,
Tourism
and
Trade
“Renewable
Energies,
situation
and
objectives,
2010”.
In
2008,
the
Spanish
government
approved
the
Royal
decree
1578/2008
of
retribution
for
the
production
of
electric
energy
through
Photovoltaic
solar
technology
for
installations
after
the
established
date
in
Royal
Decree
661/2007.
This
regulation
created
a
frenetic
movement
in
the
photovoltaic
industry,
all
investors
hurried
up
to
have
all
their
installations
ready
before
the
due
date
which
was
in
October
2008
in
order
to
benefit
from
the
tariffs
established
in
Royal
Decree
661/2007.
In
2007
the
total
installed
capacity
was
687
MW
and
during
2008
more
than
2,300
MW
were
installed
and
in
2009
only
99,01
MW
were
installed.
In
2009
when
all
the
photovoltaic
installed
capacity
started
to
operate,
there
was
a
significant
increase
in
the
total
bonuses
that
RES
received
amounting
a
total
of
5.045
Million
Euros,
while
in
2008
they
received
2,065
Million
Euros.
73.9%
of
this
increase
was
due
to
the
photovoltaic
industry.
In
contrast
with
the
development
of
the
wind
power
industry,
the
photovoltaic
industry
developed
so
quickly
that
didn’t
give
time
for
an
auxiliary
industry
to
develop
increasing
significantly
the
amount
of
imports,
during
2008,
62%
of
the
photovoltaic
cells
and
modules
were
imported
amounting
a
total
of
5,182
Million
Euros.
In
addition,
the
photovoltaic
industry
accounts
for
the
larger
number
of
installations,
making
it
expensive
to
connect
them
to
the
National
Grid.
Due
to
all
these
factors,
photovoltaic
industry
accounts
for
a
53%
of
the
over
cost
from
RES
while
only
producing
11%
of
the
electricity
generated
by
RES.
Further
on,
while
electricity
prices
in
Spain
for
wind
energy
are
in
the
average
worldwide,
for
photovoltaic
industry
it
ranks
between
the
highest,
even
though
Spain
is
the
European
country
with
more
sunlight
hours
and
more
intense
solar
ration.
Country
Wind
Power
Photovoltaic
Spain
a)
Pool
+
Bonus.
Next
20
years
a)
€450/MWh
for
the
next
25
years,
Average
tariff
for
the
last
5
years
€350/MWh for the coming ones, RD
€84
/MWh.
661/2007).
b)
Tariff
€75/MWh
for
20
years
(RD
b.1) €295/MWh cap for 25 years (RD
661/2007)
1578/2008).
b.2) €265/MWh floor for 25 years (RD
1578/2008).
China
€56-67 MWh
€121 pilot projects
Japan
€73-‐89
MWh
Germany
€92 MWh for 20 years
€287-395/MWh for the next 20 years
France
€82/MWh first 10 years, the rest €310-‐380/MWh
floor
and
cap
for
the
next
20
depending on load factor, €28- years
82/MWh
Italy
€85 MWh
€350-390MWh, not integrated
Photovoltaic energy, period 20 years.
Poland
€90MWh
N/A
Source:
Own
elaboration,
data
taken
from
Spanish
Ministry
of
Industry,
Tourism
and
Trade
“Renewable
Energies,
situation
and
objectives,
2010”.
According
to
data
from
EUROSTAT,
from
1998
till
2009,
the
Spanish
electricity
tariff
has
increased
in
36.8%
for
domestic
uses
being
5%
higher
than
the
European
Union
average
and
ranking
fifth
between
the
most
expensive.
For
Industrial
purposes,
Spain
has
the
second
most
expensive
electricity
tariff
in
the
European
Union
having
suffered
an
increase
of
77.1%
from
1998
till
2009
and
being
16.7%
higher
than
the
European
Union
Average,
This
increase
is
due
to
the
high
Tariff
deficit
in
the
Spanish
electricity
sector,
according
to
the
Renewable
Energy
Producers
Association
(APPA),
there
is
no
relation
between
the
tariff
deficit,
the
bonuses
received
and
the
increase
in
the
use
of
RES.
Source:
Macroeconomic
study
of
the
impact
of
RES
in
Spain,
APPA,
developed
by
Deloitte,
2009
According
to
APPA,
from
2005
till
2008
the
savings
coming
from
avoiding
Green
House
Gas
Emissions
(GHG)
and
from
avoiding
imports
from
fossil
fuels
is
higher
than
the
bonuses
received
from
RESE,
only
in
2009
the
amount
received
from
the
bonuses
were
higher
but
due
to
three
reasons;
the
decrease
in
the
price
of
the
ton
of
CO2,
the
lower
prices
of
fossil
fuels
during
2009
and
the
high
amount
of
bonuses
received
b
y
the
photovoltaic
industry.
Source:
Macroeconomic
study
of
the
impact
of
RES
in
Spain,
APPA,
developed
by
Deloitte,
2009
Recently,
The
Spanish
Government
has
issued
a
new
Royal
Decree
14/2010
to
establish
urgent
measures
to
reduce
the
tariff
deficit
in
the
electric
sector.
This
decree
will
limit
the
number
of
hours
in
which
the
Photovoltaic
plants
can
be
in
operation
until
2013,
reducing
the
number
from
2,500-‐2,100
hours
per
year
to
1,700-‐1,250
depending
on
the
type
of
installation,
this
means
that
they
will
reduce
their
benefits
in
a
30%
during
the
next
three
years.
Putting
investors
who
already
got
loans
in
a
very
difficult
situation
and
compromising
the
jobs
of
200,000
people.
According
to
an
interview
in
La
Vanguardia
newspaper,
Javier
Garcia
Breva,
President
of
renewable
foundation,
explained
that
the
reason
of
the
tariff
deficit
is
the
way
electricity
is
traded
in
the
Spanish
market,
when
there
is
low
demand
Nuclear
power
plants
have
the
priority
(due
to
the
fact
that
they
can
not
stop
the
production),
RES
follow
and
then
combined
cycle
natural
gas
plants.
This
means
that
many
of
the
plants
powered
by
natural
gas
only
work
at
29%
of
their
capacity,
specially
now
days
that
the
electricity
intensity
in
Spain
is
decreasing
(13%).
So,
the
government
has
to
expend
money
on
them,
in
order
to
keep
the
plants
for
whenever
they
are
necessary,
plus
subsidies
to
use
nationally
produced
coal,
which
is
more
expensive
than
the
imported
one.
At
the
same
time
Nuclear
and
hydropower
generation
plants
have
already
paid
their
investment
and
have
a
competitive
advantage
with
other
RES.
Conclusions
RES
have
shown
to
be
a
feasible
option
to
solve
Spain’s
energy
problems,
by
2020
the
cost
of
electricity
produced
by
RES
would
be
cheaper
than
the
one
generated
thorough
other
fossil
fuels;
106.99
2005
Euros/
MWh
by
RES
and
108.43
Euros/MWh
for
natural
gas
combined
cycle
plants.
In
addition
Spain
has
an
emission
cap
with
regards
to
GHG’s
so,
in
case
those
natural
gas
combined
cycle
plants
had
to
include
a
Carbon
Sequestration
System
the
price
of
each
MWh
would
jump
to
124,45
Euros.
But
in
order
to
continue
increasing
the
energy
produced
by
RES,
a
coherent
and
stable
regulatory
framework
must
be
set,
reducing
the
electric
tariff
deficit
and
increasing
the
confidence
of
investors
in
these
technologies,
instead
of
changing
the
regulations
with
retroactive
effect
every
two
years.
The
increase
in
RES
must
also
be
steady
as
it
happened
with
the
wind
power
energy
avoiding
“bubbles”
like
the
one
created
in
the
case
of
Photovoltaic
industry,
with
a
tremendous
increase
in
one
year,
but
based
on
the
bonus
received
by
the
Government.
As
Jose
Maria
Gonzalez
Velez,
President
of
APPA,
stated
in
a
recent
interview,
“the
actual
energy
generated
right
now
by
RES
is
irrelevant,
the
most
important
thing
is
the
development
of
the
technology
that
can
be
used
in
the
future”.
Spain
is
really
taking
the
lead
in
the
RES
field
and
might
get
good
results
for
the
future,
but
has
to
take
care
and
not
pay
the
“beginner's
blunder”.
Especially
in
this
moment
of
economic
crisis;
with
the
highest
unemployment
rate
since
1996,
the
reform
of
the
retirement
pensions
and
huge
budgetary
constraints
all
across
the
government.