On
Submitted to submitted by
Last but not least, we expand us heartiest gratefulness all people who
have given us best wishes & all help that we needed for the completion of
the term paper.
MANJEET PAUL
CONTENTS
Executive summary
introduction
objective of the study
hypothesis
review of literature
research design
research methodology
analysis
findings
limitations
summary
references
EXECUTIVE SUMMERY
This research has been done with new perception of people that social
networking creates new dimensions for relationship.
This research has taken one emerging issue that rise in use of social
network induces to rise in divorce cases. Here we do first exploratory
and then descriptive research. We have taken sample size of 25 people.
In which we found the correlation between social networking and rise in
divorce cases. This research also through light on reasons why people
want to use these social networking.
INTRODUCTION
I Manito Paul, student of RR1903, reg.no 10902965 have researched on
the term paper 'social networking creates new dimensions for
relationship'.
Now a day’s online social networks have become genuinely significant
new phenomena in human communication and interaction patterns and
may have a profound impact in the way people communicate and
connect with each other. In past, people have no such type of
communication approach. But now in every minute strength on social
networking sites is increasing.
People find it efficient way to interact with others online than offline
partners. It is possible that it may tend to increase in divorce cases. So
here I tried to spread light with meticulous research that whether this
thing is right or not.
HYPOTHESIS
Hypothesis is defined as declarative statement about the relationship
between two or more variables. It is of tentative nature which may be
accepted and rejected after thorough analysis of problem. From the
management dilemma, hypothesis postulated to be,
"Growth of social networking tends to increase in divorce cases."
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
this research studies that the decision to use an online social network is
conceptualized as intentional social action and the relative impact of
the three modes of social influence processes (compliance,
internalization, and identification) on intentional social action to use
(collective intention) is examined.
Sample size: Facebook users (sample size = 389)
Result:
1. An empirical study of found that collective intention to use a
social networking site is determined by both subjective norm
and social identity.
2. Further, social identity is found to be a second-order latent
construct comprised of cognitive, evaluative, and affective
(first-order) components.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Sample size sample size is 25 people So that we can trace the answers
of management question in better way.
Time dimension
This research used cross sectional study which carried out once and
represent a snapshot of one point in time.
“This research has been taken on 20 April, 2010 at 10:30 pm in model
town jalandhar, Punjab.”
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research methodology comprises of two words research and methodology.
For the actual research I have made questionnaire for 25 people married and
divorced of age group 25-35 in model town, jalandhar, Punjab.
Secondary data: secondary literature is also being used which studies are made
by others for their own purposes. For this we have used articles from
www.proquest.com, www.ssrn.com and also from times of India, books,
journal.
ANALYSIS
Here results of questionnaire are evaluated in SPSS and results are
shown with the help of graphs.
Visit of social networking(SN) sites without goal/purpose
This graph depicts the craze of people to use social networking site is such that
they are now become addicted to use social networking sites. People whether
they are married or unmarried is madly used to these sites. They use these sites
whether they have any purpose or goal in their mind.
“this graph indirectly tries to through light on issue that how these sites are
becoming necessity of people that they want to make themselves attached with
these sites out any purpose, so it may distract them to pay attention to their
personal relationships.”
no. of hours spend on SN sites by people
This graph reveals that people who are using SN sites for 13 hrs or more
are divorcee people and married people use it for 9-12 hrs and
unmarried used it to less extent than married and divorced people.
“This indicate married and divorced people’s more belongingness to SN
sites.”
when respondents use SN sites with respect to their marital status
Graph gives very meaningful information of people who got divorced now and
also from married and unmarried people that is their time to use these sites
becomes headache for their personal relationship.
This graph explains that people who got divorced now used social networking
sites in evening. This is the tie when person is free from work and he/she is in
home. So they have better time to interact and share their world with each other
but if they are spending this precious time with their online friends then this is
obvious that distances become farther between their partner and this may be the
reason of their divorced. This same case is also looks same with married and
unmarried people that they are using net after work or at work.
“This shows their craze for these social networking sites which can indulge
them in trouble in their personal life slowly.”
Ignorance of responsibility towards their partner with respect to no.
of hours spent on SN site.
Cases
Cross processing summary indicates that all people were present at the time of questionnaire
distribution.
marital status of respondents * when respondents use social networking sites Cross tabulation
Count
before going to
work at work after work evening Total
unmarried 0 2 1 0 3
divorced 4 0 0 8 12
Total 5 3 4 8 20
Cross tabulation indicates that people who are married use social networking
sites when they are at work.
Unmarried people use SN sites when they are at work and also after work.
Divorced people use these social networking sites mostly in evenings.
“This cross tabulation reveals that usage of social networking site may be the
reason of people to be divorced”
CORRELATION
Correlations
avg hours of
social
age of networking
respondents sites(s) per day
N 20 20
N 20 20
This graph clearly indicate that people who use SN sites for 5-8 hrs want to be
in relationship and be socialize.
People who use SN for 9-12 hrs also want to in relationship and share their
loneliness. People who use it for13 hrs or more want to be socializing, share
their loneliness and want to in relationship. They want to share their loneliness.
“This concludes that people who use these SN sites for more time want to share
their loneliness and relationship. It reveals that people are not satisfy or happy
with their personal life.”
Persons with whom respondents speak most
This graph want to explain that divorced people want to be most with
close friends and with their ex spouse (i.e. ex-girlfriend or boyfriend).
People who are married engaged with their family and co-workers.
Unmarried people normally chat with their family and friend.
“all in all this graph want to tell that reason to be divorcee may be with
their interaction with their close friends and ex-girlfriends or ex-
boyfriends.”
Crosstabs
Cases
marital status of respondents * with whom respondents speak most Cross tabulation
Count
unmarried 2 0 1 0 0 0 3
divorced 6 0 0 0 3 3 12
Total 8 1 2 1 4 4 20
Findings
People feel more sense of satisfaction when they are in social
networking than in real life
People have craze and kind of addiction for these SN sites.
More sense of satisfaction by knowledge sharing on social
networking
Best use free time to spend it in social networking than with their
partners.
More probability of obtaining likeminded people which give then
feeling of strength and strength to community building
Best way to extract what is in your mind whether it is positive or
negative through social networking than to share it with real
partner
More secret sharing with offline partners than real partners.
People on these sites are in contact with their ex-girl/boy friends
Which normally rarely happen.
People want to join mostly these sites for sharing their loneliness
and building relationship with strangers.
People ignore their responsibility towards their partner with use of
these sites.
People spend lot of their free time on these sites which make them
apart from their personal life.
Limitations
References
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1285778
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1535519
Catherine Ridings, Molly Wasko. Journal of the Association for
Information Systems. Atlanta: Feb 2010. Vol. 11, Iss. 2; pg. 95, 26
pgs
Z J Zhang. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. New
York: May 2010. Vol. 57, Iss. 2; pg. 225
Uwe Matzat. The American Behavioral Scientist. Thousand Oaks:
Apr 2010. Vol. 53, Iss. 8; pg. 1170
Wing Suen. Economic Inquiry. Huntington Beach: Jan 2010. Vol.
48, Iss. 1; pg. 123, 10 pgs
John Campbell, Gordon Fletcher, Anita Greenhill. Information
Systems Journal. Oxford: Sep 2009. Vol. 19, Iss. 5; pg. 461
Muise Ami,university of gulef,canadaI: Facebook breeds jealousy
in relationship,article,Mar 16, 2010, 12.00am
Peter Totterdell, a, , David Holmana and Amy Hukina
AInstitute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
S10 2TN, England, United Kingdom
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life/relationships/man-
woman/Tweets-can-spell-trouble-in-divorce-
cases/articleshow/5762255.cms
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?
_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VD1-4SF304J-
1&_user=10&_coverDate=10/31/2008&_rdoc=3&_fmt=high&_orig=
browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc
%235969%232008%23999699995%23698248%23FLA
%23display
%23Volume)&_cdi=5969&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=7&_acct=C0
00050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=b2d36bf
379131316d46bf1450805a1b1