CHAPTER V

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

TABLE 5.1
RESPONDENTS BASED ON GENDER

No .of
Gender Percentage
Respondents
Male 77 77%
Female 23 23%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE:-

From the above table shows that 77% of the respondents are below
Male and 23% of the respondents are female. So, High Majority is 77% of
the respondents are Male.
Chart No: 1

GENDER

90
77%
80
No.of. respondents

70
60
50
40
30 23%
20
10
0
Male Female
percentage
 TABLE 5.2
RESPONDENTS BASED ON AGE

No .of
AGE Percentage
Respondents
20-25 56 56%
26-35 26 26%
36-55 18 18%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 56% of the respondents are 20-25
Age level, 26% of the respondents are below 26-35 age level and 15% of the
respondents are below 36-55 age. So, High Majority is 56% of the
respondents are 20-25 age level.
 Chart No: 2

AGE

60 56%

50
No.of .Respondents

40
30 26%

20 18%
10
0
20-25 26-35 36-55
Percentage
 TABLE 5.3
RESPONDENTS BASED ON QUALIFICATION LEVEL

QUALIFICATION No .of
Percentage
LEVEL Respondents
+2 10 10%
Under Graduate 52 52%
Post Graduate 38 38%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 52% of the respondents are Under
Graduate level, 38% of the respondents are Post Graduate level and 10% of
the respondents are +2 levels. So, High Majority is 52% of the respondents
are Under Graduate level.
Chart No: 3

Qualification level

10%

38%
2
Under Graduate
+2
Post Graduate

52%
 TABLE 5.4
RESPONDENTS BASED ON EXPERIENCE LEVEL

EXPERIENCE No .of
Percentage
LEVEL Respondents
Fresher 42 42%
1-5 Months 18 18%
1-5 years 25 25%
5 years Above 15 15%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 42% of the respondents are fresher,
25% of the respondents are 1-5 years Experience level and 18% of the
respondents are 1-5 months Experience level and 15% of the respondents are
5 years above Experience levels. So, High Majority is 42% of the
respondents are Fresher.
 Chart No: 4

Experience level

45 42%
40
35
No.of .Respondents

30 25%
25
20 18%
15%
15
10
5
0
Fresher 1-5 Months 1-5 Years 5 Years
Above
Percentage
 No .of
SALARY Percentage
Respondents
5000-10000 52 52%
11000-15000 20 20%
16000-25000 23 23%
25000Above 5 5%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.5
RESPONDENTS BASED ON SALARY

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 52% of the respondents are
5000-10000 salaries, 23% of the respondents are 16000-25000 salaries and
20% of the respondents are 11000-15000 salaries and 5% of the respondents
are 25000 Above Salaries. So, High Majority is 52% of the respondents are
5000-10000 salary.

Chart No: 5

SALARY

60 52%

50
No.of .Respondents

40
23%
30 20%

20 5%
10
0
5000-10000 11000-15000 16000-25000 25000Above
Percentage
 SOURCE OF No .of
Percentage
CANDIDATES Respondents
Employee Referral 30 30%
Campus Recruitment 32 32%
Advertising 23 23%
Job Portals 15 15%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.6
RESPONDENTS BASED ON ADOPT TO
SOURCE OF CANDIDATES
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 32% of the respondents are campus
Recruitment, 30% of the respondents are Employee Referral and 23% of the
respondents are Advertising and 15% of the respondents are Job Portals. So,
High Majority is 32% of the respondents are Campus Recruitments.
Chart No: 6

No.of.Respondents Adopt source of candidate

35 32%
30%
30
25 23%
20 15%
15
10
5 SELECTING No .of Percentage
0
STAGES
Employee
Referral
LEVEL
Campus
Recruitment
Respondents
Advertising Job Portals

Percentage
ONE 10 10%
TWO 12 12%
THREE 33 33%
FOUR 45 45%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.7
RESPONDENTS BASED ON SELECTING
STAGES FOR CANDIDATES
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 45% of the respondents are Four
stage levels, 33% of the respondents are Three stage levels and 12% of the
respondents are Two stage levels and 10% of the respondents are One stage
levels. So, High Majority is 45% of the respondents are Four stage level.
Chart No: 7
Selecting stages of candidates

45%
45
40
35 33%
No.of .Respondents

30
25
20
15 10%
12%
10 0%
5
0
One Two Three Four More
stage
Percentage

TABLE 5.8
RESPONDENTS BASED ON PHYSICAL
FITNESS OF CANDIDATE
 PHYSICAL No .of
Percentage
FITNESS Respondents
YES 89 89%
NO 11 11%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 89% of the respondents are given in
physical fitness of candidate is very important and 11% of the respondents
are not given in physical fitness is important in recruitment time. So, High
Majority is 89% of the respondents are Physical fitness is very important in
recruitment of candidate.
Chart No:8

PHYSICAL FITNESS OF CANDIDATE

89%
100
80
No.of .Respondents

60
40 11%
20
0
YES NO
Percentage
 TABLE 5.9
RESPONDENTS BASED ON CRITICAL ROUND
OF SCREEN OUT CANDIDATE

SCREEN OUT No .of

Percentage
CANDIDATE Respondents

Group Discussion 13 13%

Technical Skill 22 22%
Aptitude 55 55%
HR Interview 10 10%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 55% of the respondents are screen
out in Aptitude and 22% of the respondents are screen out in Technical skill
and 13% of the respondents are screen out in Group Discussion and 10% of
the respondents are screen out in Hr Interview. So, High Majority is 55% of
the respondents are screen out in Aptitude.
Chart No:9

Critical Round of screen out candidates

60 55%
No.of.Respondents

50
40
30 22%
20 13%
10%
10
0%
0
Group Technical Aptitude Hr Interview voice and
Discussion skill Accent
Percentage
 ATTRACTING No .of
Percentage
CANDIDATE Respondents
YES 58 58%
NO 42 42%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.10
RESPONDENTS BASED ON CAREER PATH
GROWTH ASPECT ATTRACTING CANDIDATE

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 58% of the respondents are not given
career path and growth aspect and 42% of the respondents are given career
path and growth aspect of attracting candidates. So, High Majority is 58% of
the respondents are only career path and growth aspect.
Chart No:10

CAREER PATH ATTRACTING CANDIDATES

58%
60
42%
50
No.of .Respondents

40
30
20
10
0
YES NO
Percentage
.

APPEAR FOR No .of

Percentage
INTERVIEW Respondents
Place of Interview 18 18%
Brand Name 72 72%
Flexible Timing 10 10%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.11
RESPONDENTS BASED ON CANDIDATES INFLUENCES
APPEAR FOR INTERVIEW
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 72% of the respondents are given
Brand Name is very important appear for interview and 18% of the
respondents are given Palace of interview is important and 10% of the
respondents are given Flexible timing of interview. So, High Majority is
72% of the respondents are given Brand Name very important in appear
interview.

Chart No:11
 INFLUENCES CANDIDATES APPEAR FOR
INTERVIEW

10% 18%

Place of interview
Brand Name
Flexible timing

MANPOWER
72% No .of Percentage
RECRUITMENT Respondents

Internal 34 34%
External 56 56%
Both 10 10%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.12
RESPONDENTS BASED ON MANPOWER
RECRUITMENT
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 56% of the respondents are given
External Manpower recruitment and 34% of the respondents are given
Internal Manpower recruitment and 10% of the respondents are given Both
Manpower recruitment. So, High Majority is 56% of the respondents are
given External Manpower recruitment.
Chart No: 12

MAN POWER RECRUITMENT

56%
60
50 34%
No.of .Respondents

TRACKER 40 No .of Percentage

30
MAINTAIN
20 Respondents
10%

10
Software
0 6 6%
Internal External Both
Online 4 4%
Percentage
Ms-office 23 23%
Ms-Excel 67 67%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.13
RESPONDENTS BASED ON TRACKER MAINTAIN IN
SOURCES OF CANDIDATE
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 67% of the respondents are given
Ms-Excel use for tracker maintains and 23% of the respondents are given
Ms-Word use for tracker maintains and 6% of the respondents are given
Software used. So, High Majority is 67% of the respondents are given
Ms- Excel use for tracker maintains.
 Chart No: 13

Track Maintain source of candidate

70 67%

NOT60JOINING AFTER No .of Percentage

No.of .Respondents

50

OFFER
40
LETTER Respondents
23%
30
20
Salary0%Problem
10 6% 4% 73 73%
0
Personal
Manual Problem
Software Online Ms- Word 17
Ms-Excel 17%
Better of Recruiting Percentage 10 10%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.14
RESPONDENTS BASED ON NOT JOINING
AFTER OFFER LETTER
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 73% of the respondents are given
salary problem is very important of not joining after offer letter and 17% of
the respondents are given Personal problem and 10% of the respondents are
given Better offer Elsewhere. So, High Majority is 73% of the respondents
are given salary problem is very important of not joining after offer letter.
Chart No:14

REASONS FOR NOT JOINING AFTER OFFER

LETTER

80 73%
No.of.Respondents

70
60 TECHNOLOGICA No .of Percentage
50
40
30
L SUPPORT 17%
Respondents
20 10%
10 Telephone 62 62%
0
Video Conferencing
Salary Problem Personal Problem28Better Offer Elsewhere
28%
Online support Percentage
10 10%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.15
RESPONDENTS BASED ON TECHNOLOGICAL SUPPORT
FOR RECRUITING PROCESS
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 62%of the respondents are given
Telephone technological support and 28% of the respondents are given video
Conferencing technological and 10% of the respondents are given Online
technological support. So, High Majority is 62% of the respondents are
given Telephone technological support of recruiting process.
Chart No: 15

Technological support for recruiting process

70 62%
60
No.of .Respondents

50 COST No .of Percentage

40 28%
30 COLLECTING Respondents
10%
20 0%
10
0 NO 100 100%
Telephone Video Online Support Other
Total
Conferencing 100 100
Percentage

TABLE 5.16
RESPONDENTS BASED ON COST COLLECTING
FOR RECRUITMENT TIME
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 100% of the respondents are not
given collecting cost for candidate in recruitment time. So, High Majority is
100% of the respondents are given Not collecting cost for candidate in
recruitment time.
 Chart No:16

Cost Collecting Recruitment time for candidate

MONTHLY No .of
100%
Percentage
SELECTING
100
Respondents
80
No.of .Respondents

60 15-25 6 6%
40
25-50 0% 22 28%
20
50-100 68 68%
0
100Above
YES NO 4 4%
Total Percentage 100 100

TABLE 5.17
RESPONDENTS BASED ON PER MONTH HOW MANY
CANDIDATE SELECTING AND JOIN THE JOB
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 68% of the respondents are given
50-100 per month join the job for candidate and 22% of the respondents are
given 25-50 per month join the job for candidate and 6% of the respondents
are given 15-25 per month join the job for candidate and 4% of the
respondents are given 100 above per month join the job for candidate. So,
High Majority is 68% of the respondents are given 50-100 per month joined
the job for candidate.
Chart No:17
ONLINE No .of Percentage
Monthly selecting candidate and Join the job
REFERENCE Respondents
80
68%
70 Naukri 63 63%
No.of.Respondents

60
50 Monster 13 13%
40
30
Times jobs22% 17 17%
20 Jobs ahead 7 7%
6% 4%
10 Total 100 100
0
15-25 25-50 50-100 100Above
Percentage

TABLE 5.18
RESPONDENTS BASED ON COLLECTING
REFERENCE IN ONLINE
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 63% of the respondents are given
collecting reference for Naukri and 17% of the respondents are given Times
Jobs and 13% of the respondents are given Monster and 7% of the
respondents are given jobs ahead. So, High Majority is 63% of the
respondents are given collecting reference for Naukri.
 Chart No: 18

Collecting Online Reference

63%
70
60
50
No.of .Respondents

40
30 17%
13%
20 7%
10
0
Naukri Monster Times Jobs Jobs ahead
Percentage

TABLE 5.19
RESPONDENTS BASED ON PROVIDED FOR OTHER
DEPARTMENT IN RECURITMENT PROCESS
 PROVIDED FOR
No .of
OTHER Percentage
Respondents
DEPARTMENT
YES 82 82%
NO 18 18%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 82% of the respondents are given
Provided other department in recruitment process and 18% of the
respondents are not given provided other department in recruitment process.
So, High Majority is 82% of the respondents are given Provided other
department in recruitment process.
Chart No: 19

Provided Other department in Recruitment

Process

100
82%
No.of.Respondents

80
60
40
18%
20
0
YES NO
Percentage
 TABLE 5.20
RESPONDENTS BASED ON SUITABLE CANDIDATES
FOR DIFFERENT POSITION

SUITABLE No .of
Percentage
CANDIDATE Respondents
Job Rotation 12 12%
Consultancy walk in 26 26%
Advertisement 18 18%
Employee Reference 44 44%
Total 100 100

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 44% of the respondents are given
suitable sources for Employee Reference and 26% of the respondents are
given Consultancy walk In and 18% of the respondents are given
Advertisement and 12% of the respondents are given Job Rotation. So, High
Majority is 44% of the respondents are given suitable sources for Employee
Reference
Chart No: 20
Suitable candidates for different position

44%
50
No.of .Respondents

40
26%
30 18%
12%
20
10
0
Job Rotation Consultancy Advertisement Employee
Walk In Reference
Percentage
 RELATIONSHIP FOR
No .of
RECRUITING Percentage
Respondents
CANDIDATES
YES 17 17%
NO 83 83%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.21
RESPONDENTS BASED ON PREFERENCE RELATIVE’S
RELATIONSHIP FOR RECRUITING CANDIDATES

INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 83% of the respondents are not given
Preference relationship for recruiting candidates and 17% of the respondents
 are given Preference relationship for recruiting candidates. So, High
Majority is 83% of the respondents are not given Preference relationship for
recruiting candidates.

Chart No:21

Preference relationship for Recruiting candidates

100 83%

80
.Respondents
No.of .Respondents

60
40 17%
20
0
No.of

YES NO
Percentage
 RECRUITMENT No .of
Percentage
DIFFICULTIES Respondents
Lack of Applicants 22 22%
Lack of applicants with
75 75%
required work experience
Service Agreement 3 3%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.22
RESPONDENTS BASED ON FACTORS OF
RECRUITMENT DIFFICULTIES
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 75% of the respondents are given
lack of applicants with work experience and 22% of the respondents are
given lack of Applicants and 3% of the respondents are given service
Agreement. So, High Majority is 75% of the respondents are given lack of
applicants with work experience.

Chart No: 22
 Factors Recruitment Difficulties

3%
22%
Lack of Applicants

ACTION TAKEN No .of

Lack of Applicants with Percentage
work experience
RECRUITMENT Respondents
Service Agreement

DIFFICULTIES
75%
Increased Recruitment Efforts 73 73%
Recruitment from Non- 17 17%
traditional Sources
Improved pay and condition 10 10%
Total 100 100

TABLE 5.23
RESPONDENTS BASED ON ACTION TAKEN IN OVER COME
RECRUITMENT DIFFICULTIES
INFERENCE :-

From the above table shows that 73% of the respondents are given
Increased Recruitment Efforts and 17% of the respondents are given
Recruitment from Non-traditional sources and 10% of the respondents are
given Improved pay and condition. So, High Majority is 73% of the
respondents are given Increased Recruitment Efforts.
Charts No: 23

Taken Overcome Recruitment difficulties

80 73
70

No.of .Respondents
60
50
40
30 17
20 10
10
0
Increased Recruitment Improved pay
Recruitment from Non- and condition
Efforts traditional
Sources
Percentage

RANK FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

Table No: 5.24
Factors Weighted average Rank
Medical 4.08 1
Bonus 2.9 3
Provident fund 3.3 2
Loan facility 2.18 5
Others, 2.54 4

Interpretation:-

It can be observed from the above table that the respondent Ranked
Medical in the First Place, Provident fund in the Second Place, Bonus is the
Third Place, Others in the Fourth Places, And Loan Facility is Fifth,
 OPINION REGARDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY:-

Table No: 5.25

MEDICAL:-

Social Weighted Frequency Weighted

securities Points sub total
1 5 46 230
2 4 34 136
3 3 8 24
4 2 6 12
5 1 6 6

Weighted Average = weighted sub total / No. of samples

= 408/100
= 4.08
Table No: 5.26

Provident Fund:-

Weighted Frequency Weighted

Rank
Points sub total
1 5 16 80
2 4 24 96
3 3 34 102
4 2 26 52
5 1 0 0

Weighted Average = weighted sub total / No. of samples

= 330/100
= 3.3
Table No: 5.27

BONUS:-

Weighted Frequency Weighted

Rank
Points sub total
1 5 14 70
2 4 26 104
3 3 16 48
4 2 24 48
5 1 20 20

Weighted Average = weighted sub total / No. of samples

= 290/100
= 2.9
Table No: 5.28

OTHERS:-

Weighted Frequency Weighted

Rank
Points sub total
1 5 10 50
2 4 10 40
3 3 30 90
4 2 24 48
5 1 26 26

Weighted Average = weighted sub total / No. of samples

= 254/100
= 2.54
Table No: 5.29

Loan Facility :-

Weighted Frequency Weighted

Rank
Points sub total
1 5 14 28
2 4 6 12
3 3 12 24
4 2 20 40
5 1 48 96

Weighted Average = weighted sub total / No. of samples

= 218/100
= 2.18
Chart No : 5.24

Rank For social security

7%
27%
20% Medical
Bonus
Provided fund
Loan facility
13% others

33%
 CHI SQUARE TEST :-

Aim:-
To test the relationship between employees and preference,

Table No: 5.30

Rent Row
Retirement
Employees Allowanc Transport Canteen Others Total
Benefits
e
Staff 12 4 6 8 0 30
Assistance 14 0 9 12 8 43
Manager 6 3 5 0 0 14
Zone 1 2 0 4 6 13
Manager
Column 33 9 20 24 14 100
Total

Chi – square value is given by the formal.

(O-E)2
χ2 =Σ
E
 Row Total x Column Total
E=
N

Test statistics :-

Table No: 5.31

O E O-E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/E
12 9.9 2.1 4.41 0.44
4 2.7 1.3 1.69 0.62
6 6 0 0 0
8 7.2 0.8 0.64 0.08
14 14.19 -0.19 0.03 0
9 8.6 0.4 0.16 0.01
12 10.3 1.7 2.89 0.28
8 6.02 1.98 3.92 0.65
6 4.62 1.38 1.90 0.41
3 1.26 1.74 3.02 2.39
5 2.8 2.2 4.84 1.72
1 4.29 -3.29 10.82 2.52
2 1.17 0.83 0.68 0.58
4 3.12 0.88 0.77 0.24
6 1.82 4.12 16.97 9.32
19.26
 Calculated chi square value:

Degree of freedom =(r-1)x (c-1)

=(4-1)x(5-1)
= 12
Where r = No. of . Rows , C = No. of Columns,
For degree of freedom 12 at 5% significant level is 21.026

If the calculate value < tabulated value, Null hypothesis will be accepted.

CHAPTER VI
FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS

FINDINGS:-

 High majority is 77% of the respondents are Male.

 High majority is 56% of the respondents are 20-25 age level.
 High majority is 52% of the respondents are under Graduate level.
 High majority is 42% of the respondents are fresher.
 High majority is 52% of the respondents are 5000-10000 salary.
 High majority is 32% of the respondents are Campus Recruitments.
 High majority is 45% of the respondents are four stage level.
 High majority is 89% of the respondents are Physical fitness is very
important in recruitment of candidate.
 High majority is 55% of the respondents are screen out in Aptitude.
 High majority is 58% of the respondents are only career path and
growth Aspect.
 High majority is 72% of the respondents are given brand name very
important in appear interview.
 High majority is 56% of the respondents are given External
Manpower Recruitment.
 High Majority is 67% of the respondents are given Ms- Excel use for
tracker maintains.
 High majority is 73% of the respondents are given salary problem is
very important of not joining after offer letter.
 High majority is 62% of the respondents are given Telephone
technological support of recruiting process.
 High majority is 100% of the respondents are given Not collecting
cost for candidate in recruitment time.

 High majority is 68% of the respondents are given 50-100 per month
joined the job for candidate.
 High majority is 63% of the respondents are given collecting reference
for Naukri.
 High majority is 82% of the respondents are given provided other
department in recruitment process.
 High majority is 44% of the respondents are given suitable sources for
Employee Reference.
 High majority is 83% of the respondents are not given the Preference
relationship for recruiting candidates.
 High majority is 75% of the respondents are given lack of
applications with work experience.
 High majority is 73% of the respondents are given increased
Recruitment Efforts.

SUGGESTIONS

The company needs to recruit high quality of candidates with the right
skills on the appropriate contracts to deliver the key objectives of the
position and organization.
It needs to ensure that the equality of opportunity is considered as an
integral part of the recruitment practices, thus encouraging diversity.
The major issue due to which the candidates are skeptical joining the
company is the bond problem.
The company has to ensure that recruitment is fair, efficient and cost
effective. Facilitate and encourage best practice by training those involved to
follow a structured and systematic process of selection.
 Continuously monitor, review and improve the recruitment process in
the light of experience and information obtained from those involved in the
process.

CONCLUSION

The study has concentrated on the recruitment process of In HR

Planman consulting Pvt. Ltd., -Egmore
The study has been conducted on the recruitment of candidates and is
confirmed only to HR Planman consulting Pvt. Ltd., -Egmore
The company seems to be moving in right lines as far as its recruitment
strategy is concerned. However a few drawbacks were found and
remedies are suggested.
 ABSTRACT

The study was made at HR Planman consulting Pvt. Ltd.,-Egmore on

recruitment process for fresh candidates. The scope of the study is to analyze the
effectiveness of the current recruitment system and to know drawbacks of it. Also enable
a proper recruitment strategy to be followed for candidates.

The objective of this study is to find out the sources of recruitment preferred by
the company and also find out the difficulties in recruiting candidates. It also helps in
finding out the requirements & sources needed to recruit the candidates and even improve
recruitment process.
 The type of research design used is descriptive in nature and the required data is
been generated using a research instrument called the questionnaire, to a sample of 100
employees are convenience sampling chi-square and weighted average method. The
period of study is three months.

The collected data is been analyzed using various statistical tools named chi-
square and graphs, after analyzing the data general and statistical findings are soughed out
through interpretation, suggestions & recommendations and hence formulated summary
of findings.

This study reveals that overall recruitment process given by the organization is
effective and suitable for HR Planman consulting Pvt. Ltd.,-Egmore recruiting
strategy.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS:
 Asit.K.Ghosh. Prem Kumar, Human Resource Management – Anmol
Publications – New Delhi.
 Harry Dessler, Human Resource Management – Prentice Hall – New
Delhi.
 P.Subburan, Personnel and Human Resource Management – Himalaya
Publications – New Delhi.
 Prof.M.V.Pylee, Industrial Relations and Personnel Management –
Vikas Publications – New Delhi.
 Shashik Gupta, Human Resource Management – Kalyani – New
Delhi.
 V.Balu, Human Resource Management – Sri Venkateswara
Publications – Chennai.
 Ved.Prakash, Human Resource Management – Anmol Publications –
New Delhi.