!
: In the short-term, I don¶t see any major impact on continuity. There is pressure on these
companies and they are aware of that pressure about the legality of the licenses that were issued
to them. There would be concerns but as far as continuing with what they are doing, as long as
the licenses are valid I don¶t see any serious problem.
c "
#
!
: It basically appears to be accelerated momentum with regard to how the government and
the Supreme Court and CBI are all following this case. While one might have thought this case
may carry on for a little longer it seems to be well on course to come to a conclusion this year.
The companies which are being investigated will face a bit of pressure. We have to see the
actual outcome of the regulation, what happens in terms of whether a penalty is imposed or
whether spectrum charges are put those are the bigger issues.
c $
!
!
: Those who have to pay the penalty will face penalty that is the only ramification whether it
comes as reason one or reason two or spectrum charges.
c %
$&
#
$
$
!
: The case is partly in the price and partly will depend on the outcome.
c '
!
(
!
Hirani: The bail application rejection seems to be a little harsh. Most of the companies that are
involved in this scam and including the senior executives, they have been cooperating and
coming up to the CBI and answering most of the questions and queries that have been put out.
Therefore, putting them under judicial custody whilst investigations are in progress prima facie
seems to be a little harsh.
The ramifications for the sector are quite significant because the message this sends out is that
you could be an executive and a professional in any leading telecom company and if there is any
allegation made either by the government or anybody else at a future point of time that there
were some irregularities in the sector or in the award of any license then you would be put to test
and you could be put into a judicial custody kind of a situation.
It rings alarm bells for the sector, for the professionals working in this sector and also what we
are seeing is the reopening of a number of other much prior deals like the Tata-VSNL deal from
2002 and similar other deals, so if there are again allegations of irregularities whilst inquiries are
being conducted then there is a lot of fear for the executives who are operating in this sector.
c
$
!
': There is 50-50 chance; a better judicial sense prevails in the higher court. I am sure that
the Delhi High Court may not be the last verdict in the matter because be it the government or be
it the companies, there will be an appeal that will probably go to the Supreme Court (SC). The
law needs to be looked at carefully and unnecessary hardship should be caused only if the public
prosecutor can prove. There is an obfuscation of evidence or if there is a restoration of facts or
some documents are going to be tampered with and having these people outside can be harmful
to the judicial process, should this kind of an application be fizzle out. Hence, one does hope that
the appellate courts look at the merit and see if indeed there will be any injustice done and then
pass the appropriate order.
c &
c
$
/ %
$
$!