Daily
the Brown
vol. cxlvi, no. 56
Members of teams slated for cuts rallied yesterday afternoon on the Main Green.
Ne ws in brief
RISD abandons
restructuring
Rhode Island School of
Design Provost Jessie Shefrin
has decided not to implement
a divisional restructuring plan
that triggered the faculty’s “no
confidence” vote in President
John Maeda and the provost last
month, Shefrin wrote in an email
to RISD faculty Friday.
The administration previously
proposed to delay restructuring
by a year, but Shefrin’s email is
the first mention of abandoning
the plan altogether.
“I made this decision after
listening to and consulting
with many faculty and the
deans,” Shefrin wrote. “This is
in recognition of the need to
not only slow down the pace
of change, but also to focus on
the things that are the highest
priorities.”
But the email’s tone
frustrated several faculty
members, who remain
disaffected by the
administration. “There’s a sense
of futility about this whole
enterprise,” said Mark Sherman,
chair of the Faculty Steering
Committee.
“The emphasis on her having
made the decision is very
interesting since we had to fight
tooth and nail to get to that
point,” Sherman said. “They’re
really only doing what they
should have been doing in the
beginning.”
— Rebecca Ballhaus
news....................2-4
inside
editorial...............6
Opinions................7
SPORTS....................8
Emily Gilbert / Herald
Amid upheaval, Watson examines mission
By Shefali Luthra
Senior Staff Writer
The Watson Institute for Interna-
tional Studies is reevaluating its mis-
sion as it seeks to hire a new director,
narrow its focus areas for research
and clarify its role in undergraduate
teaching.
This debate is not new — the
Watson Institute has questioned
its direction and purpose since the
Cold War ended. But the March
resignation of Michael Kennedy,
the institute’s current director, the
School closure vote
pushed to Thursday
By Kyle McNamara
Staff Writer
The Providence School Board held a
meeting last night to discuss Mayor
Angel Taveras’ recommendation to
close four of the city’s public schools
and convert a middle school to an
city & state
elementary school. The board, which
was originally scheduled to vote on
the decision yesterday, decided to
postpone the vote until Thursday
due to lingering questions about the
city’s financial capabilities.
Instead, the board reviewed the
financial impact of the proposal
and allowed community members
to voice concerns.
A 30-minute rally attended by
Higher taxes Passed over
Bill looks to repeal Bush tax
cuts for the wealthy in R.I.
city & state, 4
Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Protestors rally against Vohra to
proposed cuts to teams step down
By Sarah Forman
Staff Writer
About 75 students gathered on the
Main Green Monday afternoon to
protest the Athletics Review Com-
mittee’s recommendations to cut four
varsity teams, and some protestors
continued to express dismay over
the proposal to President Ruth Sim-
mons during her open hours later
in the day.
Most of the protesters were mem-
bers of the wrestling team, women’s
ski team and men’s and women’s
fencing teams, which could lose all
support from the University if Sim-
mons and the Corporation accept
the committee’s suggestions for the
2011-12 academic year. Though it is
a club program, the men’s ski team,
which is also facing the possibility
of being cut, was represented at the
February redesign of the interna-
tional relations concentration and
an external review last fall have re-
invigorated the debate.
Discussions between the Univer-
sity and the Watson Institute over
the next two years will “redirect
staffing and develop a clearer idea
of specific goals,” President Ruth
Simmons told the Undergraduate
Council of Students earlier this
month, according to UCS meeting
minutes.
The institute is in “serious trou-
ble,” said Abbott Gleason, professor
about 50 protestors and organized
by the Providence Parent Teacher
Student Community Coalition took
place outside the building before the
meeting began. Anna Kuperman,
a teacher at Classical High School
and a member of the coalition, said
the group has proposed a year-long
review to avoid prematurely closing
the schools. The coalition currently
consists of approximately 60 parents
and teachers.
Brown students also attended the
rally. Students came to support and
acknowledge the University’s obliga-
tion to the Providence community,
said Julian Park ’12, a Herald opin-
ions columnist. Protesters moved
inside the building as the meeting
started, chanting slogans such as,
continued on page 3
Jewish holidays overlooked
in U.’s schedule
Opinions, 7
rally as well.
Over the course of the hour-
long protest, students and alums
expressed general frustration with
the committee’s report and tried to
disprove what they saw as inconsis-
tencies and misinformation.
“The fact of the matter is that
the committee’s report was based
on no facts,” said Krista Consiglio
’11, captain of the women’s ski team,
to cheers from the ralliers. The report
lists extensive travel as one explana-
tion for dropping the ski team, but
after calculating other teams’ travel,
Consiglio and her teammates found
they drove fewer miles than most
other winter sports teams.
Wrestler Daniel Cataldi ’14 coun-
tered the report’s description of the
wrestling program as “one of our
continued on page 3
emeritus of history, who directed the
Watson Institute between 1999 and
2000. Gleason worked at the Watson
Institute’s predecessor, the Institute
for International Studies, when it
was originally established in 1986.
“It’s lost its way,” he said, add-
ing that “neither the students nor
the faculty know any longer what
they want.”
Unclear aims
The University is legally bound
continued on page 2
Protestors fought public school closures at a school board meeting yesterday.
weather
Shunned
Dissent gets shut out
of conversations
Opinions, 7
Since 1891
as dean of
faculty
By Shefali Luthra
Senior Staff Writer
Dean of the Faculty Rajiv Vohra P’07
will step down from his position at
the end of June, President Ruth Sim-
mons and Provost David Kertzer ’69
P’95 P’98 wrote in an email to the
faculty yesterday.
Vohra, who will resume his posi-
tion as professor of economics, said
he decided to step down because he
has held the administrative post for
seven years. Administrative posi-
tions generally have a “fixed-time
horizon,” he said. Vohra has worked
at Brown since 1983 and served as
dean of the faculty since 2004.
“It just seemed like the right time
for me to go back to research and
teaching,” Vohra said.
Vohra’s decision to step down
was not influenced by Kertzer’s de-
parture from the administration,
also scheduled for June 30, he said.
Kertzer will head a search com-
mittee for a new dean of the faculty.
The committee, which will com-
prise faculty members from various
departments, plans to find Vohra’s
successor within the University.
Vohra said he does not know when
a new dean will be selected, though
administrators hope to have one in
continued on page 3
Crystal Vance Guerra / Herald
t o d ay tomorrow
69 / 57 67 / 56
2 Campus News
calendar
Today April 26
5:30 P.m.
Panel Discussion: “What’s Next for
the Economy?” MacMillan 117
6 p.m.
Reading of “The Birds” with
Emiliano Buis, Petteruti Lounge
menu
SHARPE REFECTORY
LUNCH
Artichoke, Kalamata and Pepper
Calzone, Italian Beef Noodle
Casserole, Couscous Pearls
DINNER
Vegan Chana Masala, Apricot
Beef with Sesame Noodles, Curry
Chicken with Coconut
Sudoku
Cr ossword
ToMORROW April 27
7 p.m.
Brown Lecture Board Presents
Sanjay Gupta, Salomon 101
7 p.m.
Environmental Film Festival:
"Gasland" Screening, Wilson 102
VERNEy-WOOLLEY DINING HALL
Beef Tacos, Vegan Burritos, Refried
Beans, Corn and Sweet Pepper
Saute, Butterscotch Chip Cookies
Rotisserie Style Chicken, Pizza
Rustica, Tortellini Italiano with
Sausage, Raspberry Bars
Recent turmoil clouds Watson’s mission
continued from page 1
to align the Watson Institute’s goals
with those expressed in an agree-
ment with the Watson family, which
dates back to when the institute was
originally endowed with gifts from
the Watsons and other donors, Sim-
mons told UCS.
Lucinda Watson P’03, a mem-
ber of the institute’s Board of Over-
seers and daughter of its namesake,
Thomas Watson Jr. ’37, does not
have that founding agreement and
does not know what it outlines, she
said. Still, she believes Simmons is
“dedicated” to restoring the Wat-
son Institute’s original mission and
“hanging on” to the document. The
Herald was unable to access a copy
of the document, which is not stored
in the University archives.
The institute’s mission has “got-
ten foggy” in the years since it was
founded, Watson said. “Most of us
who are involved with the institute
would like to see the direction …
clarified.”
People have discussed what the
Watson Institute’s purpose should
be “since the end of the Cold War,”
Gleason said. One of Thomas Wat-
son Jr.’s goals in founding the Wat-
son Institute was preventing conflict
between the United States and the
former Soviet Union.
Specifically, the Watson Institute
is examining its areas of focus for re-
search — a discussion that came out
of an external review last fall, said
David McKinney P’80 P’82 P’89,
chair of the Board of Overseers.
Such reviews are normal for aca-
demic institutes and departments,
he said.
The review committee, which
consisted of evaluators from Prince-
ton, Boston University and the Mas-
sachusetts Institute of Technology,
was “complimentary” of the insti-
tute, McKinney said. But the com-
mittee also said the University could
get more “leverage” by focusing on
a few areas, McKinney said, rather
than spreading itself over many and
not making a “significant contribu-
tion” to any.
Daily
the Brown
www.browndailyherald.com
195 Angell St., Providence, R.I.
Ben Schreckinger, President
Sydney Ember, Vice President
The Brown Daily Herald (USPS 067.740) is an independent newspaper serving the
Brown University community daily since 1891. It is published Monday through Fri-
day during the academic year, excluding vacations, once during Commencement, once
during Orientation and once in July by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Single copy free
for each member of the community.
POSTMASTER please send corrections to P.O. Box 2538, Providence, RI 02906.
Periodicals postage paid at Providence, R.I.
Subscription prices: $280 one year daily, $140 one semester daily.
Copyright 2011 by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. All rights reserved.
editorial
(401) 351-3372
herald@browndailyherald.com
The Watson Institute might have
lost sight of its focus because of its
academic nature, Watson said. “I
think that what happens is if you
are in academia and you are always
wanting to examine every possible
area of interest, often you lose the
specific focus of what the institute
started being about in the first
place,” she said.
Newell Stultz, professor emeritus
of political science who worked at
the Watson Institute when it was
founded, called this period of re-
evaluation a “good moment” for the
Watson Institute.
“A new vision will be laid down
and will be considered as it hasn’t
been in the past,” he said. “The fu-
ture will owe much to what is about
to occur or what is already occur-
ring.”
Watson, a history
The Watson Institute resulted
from a union between the Center
for Foreign Policy Development and
other existing centers for interna-
tional studies, Stultz said.
Originally called the Institute
for International Studies, it was re-
named in the late 1980s for Thomas
Watson Jr. upon then-President
Howard Swearer’s request.
Though located on campus,
the Center for Foreign Policy De-
velopment was not “actually part
of Brown,” Stultz said. It focused
mostly on preventing nuclear war,
while international studies at the
University was a “modest” activity.
The international relations concen-
tration, for instance, had virtually
“no budget at all,” he said.
Stultz said he was inspired by a
visit to Yale’s international studies
institute, which compiled its inter-
national programs in one place. He
brought the idea to Swearer, and
the discussion bore the Council
for International Studies in the late
1970s and the Watson Institute a
decade later.
But Stultz said the institute’s mis-
sion has changed over time.
“Frankly, when this thing began
— what is it now, 25 years ago — the
Herald
Matthew Burrows, Treasurer
Isha Gulati, Secretary
Business
(401) 351-3260
gm@browndailyherald.com
The Brown Daily Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
principle was to put more resources
in the pockets of units that were al-
ready in existence,” he said. Over
time, “ambitions developed to create
in the institute its own independent
research agenda.”
Gleason agreed that the Watson
Institute has grown since its “intel-
lectually carefree” days, when there
was a small staff and “hostility to
disciplinary barriers.”
“The institution has become less
successful and driven with intellec-
tual schisms and faculty infighting
and lack of leadership,” he said. He
attributed this change to the insti-
tute’s natural maturation, but also
to a “series of unsuccessful appoint-
ments,” though he did not specify
which appointments he considers
unsuccessful.
Recent upheaval
Much of the institute’s research
structure was “dismantled” under
Kennedy’s predecessor, David Ken-
nedy ’76, said Patrick Heller, profes-
sor of sociology and international
studies. David Kennedy served as
the institute’s interim director be-
tween 2008 and 2009.
When David Kennedy came in,
Heller said, the institute had four
research programs with a “long
tradition,” a core faculty and an es-
tablished faculty governance struc-
ture and budget. But David Kennedy
wanted the institute to grant tenure
to professors — a motion blocked
by University faculty — and to bring
international legal scholars to the
institute.
“David Kennedy came and had
a very different vision of what this
place was,” Heller said.
David Kennedy also attempted to
implement a legal studies program
at Watson, a move unpopular with
faculty and administrators, The Her-
ald reported in 2009. Faculty mem-
bers critiqued David Kennedy for
his desire to establish a law school at
the institute, according to the article.
David Kennedy resigned in
June 2009 and was succeeded by
Michael Kennedy, no relation, who
announced in March his intention
to step down at the end of this aca-
demic year.
“The Watson Institute has seen
four directors step down over the
course of six years. This suggests
the importance of attending to some
structural issues leading to so many
changes,” Michael Kennedy wrote
in an email to The Herald. “My
resignation allows the University
administration and Watson’s Board
of Overseers to focus on those long-
standing challenges.”
Lucinda Watson suggested Mi-
chael Kennedy resigned to give the
Watson Institute a fresh start. “I
think he felt that the institute was
at a crisis point, and the best thing
might be to have a new slate,” she
said.
But once the Watson Institute
clarifies its mission, a new director
may have less freedom to define the
institute.
“If there’s a fresh start with a clear
vision created and with everyone
feeling a consensus, we’ll be able to
go forward with a leader,” Watson
said.
continued on page 4
The Brown Daily Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Student-athletes, alums respond to potential athletic cuts
continued from page 1
more expensive programs to sup-
port.” Except for coaches’ salaries, the
program receives all its funding from
other sources, Cataldi said.
“It may be (an expensive sport),
but the school doesn’t pay that,” he
said.
Other students pointed out that
the men’s fencing team placed 13th at
the NCAA Fencing Championships.
According to the report, the program
is not yet at the “necessary level for a
high-quality competitive experience”
and could not reach that intensity
of competition without significant
financial investment.
In addition to calling specific facts
from the report into question, stu-
dents said they feel disempowered
by the committee’s recommendation.
“How would you feel if they took
your family away from you?” asked
Brady Caspar ’13, who said the men’s
ski team is his primary community at
Brown. Without their teams, many
students will lose support systems
and structures they need in college,
he said.
David Gustovich ’95, a former
wrestler, said cutting the programs
Campus News 3
will deny future students the chance
to receive high quality education —
particularly since the teams attract
students from diverse socioeconomic
and geographic backgrounds who
might not otherwise gain admission
to the University.
“This is a symbolic thing,” said
Sam Barney ’12, one of several
non-athletes at the rally. She said
the school would be reneging on its
commitment to support students’
passions by cutting the teams. “This
is our University turning its back on
us,” she said.
Simmons and the Corporation
will decide in May whether to accept
the committee’s recommendations.
In the meantime, the athletes say
they will continue to voice oppo-
sition to the proposed measures,
particularly during meetings with
committee members this week.
Several students met with Sim-
mons Monday afternoon after the
protest to discuss their concerns, said
wrestler Hudson Collins ’11.5.
Alums are also getting involved in
the effort. Rob Davidson ’70, former
captain of the wrestling team, said
he is part of an active group of for-
mer athletes fundraising to make the
wrestling team more self-sufficient
and contacting committee and Cor-
poration members to express disap-
proval of the proposed cuts.
Although the majority of pro-
testors at Monday’s rally stood to
be affected personally by the cuts, a
contingent of non-athletes and ath-
letes on unaffected teams also joined
the effort in solidarity.
“We’re going to talk to President
Simmons, we’re going to talk to the
people we know on the Corpora-
tion, and we’re going to save Brown
athletics,” said field hockey captain
Tacy Zysk ’11.

U. to search internally for new dean

continued from page 1
place by July 1.
Mark Schlissel, who will replace
Kertzer as provost in July, said he
was “surprised” by the announce-
ment. Schlissel is not technically
part of the search committee, since
the search will start before his term
begins. But he said he hopes to come
to campus once Simmons and the
committee have identified final can-
didates.
“I would love to have the op-
portunity to come meet with them
before the final decision is made, but
that decision really won’t be mine,”
he said. As chief academic officer, the
provost oversees the dean of the fac-
ulty, and the two work together on
academic and faculty-related issues.
Schlissel added that, though it
may be difficult for the University
to identify a new dean while also
dealing with a provost turnover, he
respects Vohra’s decision to return
to academia.
Vohra and Kertzer’s departures
from the administration will not
create a “huge gap in institutional
memory,” Vohra said, but new ad-
ministrators will need to brush up
on current issues and debates.
“I’m not disappearing into the
sunset,” he added. “I’m going to
Robinson Hall. There will be a lot
of people around who will know
what the discussions have been.”
The University will try to work
out a “transition” with the new dean,
he said.
It will help that the new dean
will probably come from within the
faculty, since that person will bring
continuity to ongoing issues such
as the debate over proposed tenure
changes, Schlissel said.
Vohra said he has been thinking
about stepping down at least since
the semester began. When he first
assumed the position, he did not
imagine he would serve longer than
five years.
“It’s possible I could have contin-
ued for another year or so,” he said.
“But really, I was coming towards
the end.”

Lingering questions postpone vote

continued from page 1
“They say cutbacks, we say fight
back!” Ralliers promised to return for
the board’s vote Thursday evening.
Carleton Jones, chief operating
officer of the Providence Public
School District, presented the im-
pact of the proposal to the board.
He said students would be placed in
higher performing schools and refer-
enced the “walk optimization” plan,
which would place students within
1.5 miles of their homes. He added
that siblings — and most likely chil-
dren living in the same apartment
complexes — would be relocated to
the same schools.
The proposal also offers students
the option to transfer schools if they
provide for their own transportation.
Jones said the proposal would
save a net $7.7 to $10.4 million and
would displace 1,943 students. Half
of those savings would result from
the firing of 44 to 70 teachers.
The proposal is a result of a re-
ported 5,000 excess seats in Provi-
dence public schools. By closing the
four schools, the number of teachers
would better correspond to the stu-
dent population, according to the
state’s standard student-to-teacher
ratio of 26 to one.
Following Jones’ presentation,
community members were each al-
lotted three minutes to voice their
opinions.
“Give us the opportunity to get it
done, and I know we can,” said Steve
Smith, president of the Providence
Teachers Union, referencing the
coalition’s plan to institute a review
process before closing the schools.
“Public schools are not corpora-
tions, and our children are not com-
modities,” said another community
member.
The proposed closures send the
message that the community’s chil-
dren aren’t “worth it,” said Frank
Almeida, equipment mechanic for
the Department of Facilities Manage-
ment at Brown.
Both his wife, April, and his
daughter spoke after him. “Please
do not close my school,” his daughter
pleaded.
Several speakers called for the
board to postpone voting a second
time, insisting the Thursday deadline
does not allow enough time to make
the decision.
4 Campus News
Watson seeks to balance teaching and research
continued from page 2
New areas of focus
There is an “emerging consen-
sus” that the Watson Institute needs
to maintain a sense of independence
even while remaining “embedded”
within the existing research initia-
tives at the University, Heller said.
In particular, he said, it is “dif-
ficult to conceive” of a Watson
Institute that does not emphasize
security as one of its major areas of
strength in research. Security, one
of the Watson Institute’s historical
emphases, is mentioned in the insti-
tute’s first-ever annual report, issued
for the 1989-90 academic year.
Though McKinney said having
three or four areas of focus for the
institute “makes a lot of sense,” he
cannot know what they should be
until the Board of Overseers exam-
ines the institute, talks to faculty
and names a new interim director.
But Watson said the institute
must define its vision before find-
ing a new director.
The Watson Institute also has
a strong program in researching
inequality, McKinney said. Current
issues could also be selected as areas
of study, and McKinney added that
a new director should be interested
in focusing on India and China.
Heller said security and devel-
opment are two areas of focus in
which “everyone” thinks the insti-
tute should continue to invest, but
that other potential focuses — if
the institute should even have more
than two — are less clear.
The University’s role
Though the Watson Institute has
its own endowment, the University
exercises ultimate oversight. The
Board of Overseers makes recom-
mendations about how the institute
should be structured, but all final
decisions lie with the administra-
tion and Corporation.
“The institute is a part of the
University,” McKinney said. “They
are the fiduciary, responsible (par-
ty).”
Watson expressed a similar sen-
timent, saying the institute is “rep-
resentative of international relations
at Brown.” She expressed confidence
that the University would do a good
job deciding the institute’s ultimate
focus.
“I have faith in President Sim-
mons’ ability to work things out,”
she said.
Members of the Board of Over-
seers will work with University ad-
ministrators to outline potential
reforms, Simmons told UCS.
But Gleason warned that the ad-
ministration should be careful as it
reexamines the institute.
“The administration has to find
its way between leading too directly
and leading not directly enough,
and sometimes that’s a tightrope,”
he said.
The undergraduate experience
The institute is also examining
its role in undergraduate life.
“The Watson isn’t really a de-
partment— it’s a research institute,”
Heller said. “So there is a debate
about the appropriate role for how
Watson should be in supporting
Brown’s teaching mission.”
The question of how active the
institute should be in undergraduate
life is a “very political” one, Watson
said.
But the institute should “clearly”
play a role in undergraduate aca-
demics, McKinney said. The size
of the international relations con-
centration, he said, demonstrates
a campus need for “something like
the institute.” In 2010, 119 students
graduated with concentrations in
international relations.
The institute has drawn criticism
for not doing enough to reach out
to undergraduates. Reva Dhingra
’14, who plans to concentrate in
international relations, said though
she is happy with her experience
thus far, she has seen people drop
the concentration because they were
discouraged by introductory classes
taught by graduate students.
“They should definitely talk to
the freshmen way more,” she said.
The international relations con-
centration has at least one adviser
per track and one central adviser
— Claudia Elliott MA’91 PhD’99,
associate director of international
relations. Dorothy Lutz ’13, who
recently declared her concentra-
tion in international relations, said
that after hearing that the Watson
Institute’s advising was poor, she
was surprised to have a “pretty posi-
tive experience” when declaring her
concentration.
At the same time, though, Lutz
said she does not believe the Watson
Institute’s primary interest should
be undergraduate education.
“Ultimately, the Watson Institute
should be geared towards research
— grad students and faculty — be-
cause there’s some pretty awesome
people who work there,” she said.
Stultz said any institute that
wants to be a part of the University
“has to relate” to undergraduate life.
“I’m not anxious to see Watson
isolate itself at all from the under-
graduate mission,” Stultz said, but
“that doesn’t mean that’s all it has
to do.”
Identifying what role Watson
should play in undergraduate life
is “tricky,” Heller said.
“Teaching takes away from re-
search time,” he said. “With the
proper design and the proper ar-
rangements, it’s possible to make
that a win-win proposition as well.
But it’s challenging. There’s no doubt
that it’s extremely challenging.”
State rep. aims to roll
back Bush tax cuts
By Katherine Long
Staff Writer
Rep. Larry Valencia, D-Charles-
town, plans to introduce a bill this
week that would roll back Bush-era
tax cuts for Rhode Island’s wealthy
to rein in the state’s projected $331
million budget deficit. The bill,
which is still being drafted, pro-
poses increasing income tax rates
for married couples earning over
$250,000 and individuals earning
over $200,000 by 4.1 percent —
the same rate by which they were
lowered when the cuts became
law in 2003.
city & state
The bill is an alternative to the
sales tax expansion proposed by
Gov. Lincoln Chafee ’75 P’14 in
his budget for the next fiscal year.
Chafee’s plan would raise $165
million by lowering the state sales
tax to 6 percent, taxing some cur-
rently exempt items and services at
that rate and imposing a 1 percent
sales tax on other exempt items.
“My bill shines a light on the
fact that the poor are getting
poorer while the rich are getting
richer,” said Valencia, a member
of the House Finance Commit-
tee. “I think we should start do-
ing something about it.” Chafee’s
proposal to expand the sales tax
would hit the state’s poor the hard-
est, he said.
But Valencia is not optimistic
about the bill’s chances for suc-
cess. He said he sees the legisla-
tion as a progressive option that
could be incorporated in a more
centrist bill. “I can’t see the Gen-
eral Assembly approving (the bill)
without also approving some sort
The Brown Daily Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
of sales tax reduction or other re-
duction,” he said. “I hope that it
will open discussion in an envi-
ronment that’s generally conser-
vative.”
That discussion has already
started. House Speaker Gordon
Fox, D-Providence, has solicited
requests for alternatives to Chafee’s
sales tax modifications, which he
has called “unacceptable.”
“Rep. Valencia’s bill will defi-
nitely be looked at as part of the
budget process as a whole,” said
Larry Berman, Fox’s director of
communications. “We’re going to
look at every way to find savings
and go from there. … It’s a work
in progress.”
Three weeks ago, Ocean State
Action, a liberal Rhode Island lob-
bying coalition, proposed imple-
menting a 2 percent tax increase
on incomes over $500,000. That
proposal was taken up by Rep.
Scott Guthrie, D-Coventry, and
introduced as the “Patriot Tax.”
The bill is currently under review
by the House Finance Committee.
The “Patriot Tax” should
be part of a comprehensive ap-
proach to deficit reduction, said
Kate Brock, executive director of
Ocean State Action. “Other action
would need to be taken in addition
to this bill.”
Other alternatives to Chafee’s
sales tax plan include a bill intro-
duced by Minority Leader Robert
Watson, R-Greenwich, which calls
for further cuts to the Department
of Health and the Department of
Human Services.
Students are also entering the
debate. Last week Aaron Regun-
berg ’12 organized a canvassing
campaign in Fox’s district in sup-
port of Valencia’s bill. Fifteen
students worked a phone bank,
and four canvassed door-to-door,
according to Regunberg. He esti-
mated that their efforts reached at
least 400 households.
“The responses we got from
Fox’s constituents were over-
whelmingly positive, and a bunch
of them either called up the Speak-
er’s office right in front of our vol-
unteers or committed to doing so
tomorrow,” he wrote in an email to
The Herald. “I think we can build
some real grassroots support for
this bill, and translate it into real
grassroots pressure on the House
and Senate leadership.”
Regunberg said he supports Va-
lencia’s bill over the Patriot Tax
because it restores revenue lost
to tax cuts rather than adding a
new tax.
Chafee communications aide
Samuel Lovett said Chafee disap-
proves of the Bush tax cuts but
declined to comment on whether
the governor felt Valencia’s bill was
a viable alternative to the proposed
sales tax changes. As a U.S. sena-
tor, Chafee voted against tax cuts
signed into law by President Bush
in 2001 and 2003.
Valencia plans to introduce the
bill Wednesday, at which point it
will be added to the Finance Com-
mittee calendar. He said the bill
will likely be heard in May.
The Brown Daily Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Academics, atmosphere
key points for athletes
continued from page 8
“From the financial aspect, it
affects the recruiting base,” Agel
said. “You don’t want to waste your
time recruiting with someone who
is not going to be able to afford it.
You have to find somebody who
understands that the cost of the
education up front is going to play
itself out on the back end. You in-
vest x amount now, you are going to
have x times 10 coming out.”
Many athletes not only denied
that the lack of scholarships was
detrimental, but also said they were
in fact glad for the restrictions.
“It’s a different outlook from
your sport being a job versus being
a voluntary activity,” said Allison
Galer ’11, a former member of the
women’s basketball team.
“If your scholarship funding is
tied to being on a team, you feel
more pressure to excel, even if
you’re really unhappy,” said Casey
Kelsey ’11, a member of the wom-
en’s crew team. “Because Brown
doesn’t have any scholarships,
there’s no one here that doesn’t
want to be working as hard as we
do. It leads to a better atmosphere,
because no one feels obligated to
be rowing just because they have
to retain their scholarship.”
The lack of scholarships also
Sports Tuesday 5
comics
Cloud Buddies! | David Emanuel
attributes to the high number of
athletes who decide to “retire,” or
leave, their sports, said Howard
Chudacoff, a history professor who
teaches EDUC 0850: “History of
Intercollegiate Athletics.”
“Basketball is a big part of my
life, but I knew it wasn’t necessar-
ily my future personally on the
court,” said Galer, now president
of the Brown Sports Business club. Dot Comic | Eshan Mitra and Brendan Hainline
“I realized there were a lot of op-
portunities I wanted to pursue off
the basketball floor.”
“I just didn’t have the same pas-
sion for it here,” said Dylan Daniels
’14, who is contemplating giving up
athletics. “And when you’re doing
something for a minimum 20 hours
per week that you’re not enjoying,
it takes a toll on you. Not having a
scholarship makes it easier for me
to walk away and do something
that I want to be doing.” Gelotology| Guillaume Riesen
But the lack of scholarships also
leads to a stronger team bond and
relationship among players.
“Everyone is so pumped to be
doing what they’re doing, includ-
ing in volleyball,” said Danielle
Vaughan ’11, a member of the vol-
leyball team. “I’ve been on teams
where girls are dragging their feet
coming to practice, and I really like
the idea that if they’re on the volley-
ball team, they still love the game.”
6 Editorial The Brown Daily Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Editorial Editorial comic b y a l e x y u ly

Priorities
Last week, the Athletics Review Committee presented a set of pro-
posals for review by President Ruth Simmons and the Corporation.
Among its recommended policy changes, the committee suggested
cutting four athletic teams — men’s wrestling, women’s skiing and
men and women’s fencing — and increasing the overall athletics
budget by 10 percent. The debate over these proposals has grown
fierce and emotional.
This is an extremely difficult issue with severe personal costs. We
empathize with current team members, coaches and recruits, all of
whom might lose teams that largely define their lives at Brown. We
hope students, faculty and alums will treat this debate with tact and
respect for all involved.
The committee’s decision comes at a crossroads of sorts for Uni-
versity athletics. Brown currently has the most athletic teams in the
Ivy League, 37, yet simultaneously spends the least amount on ath-
letes. Further, Brown teams generate the least revenue out of any Ivy
institution. Ultimately, there are too few resources spread around too
many teams. The Herald has documented the negative consequences
— low coach salaries, limited funding for recruits who need financial
aid and poor on-the-field performance. Given the tough economic
times, the committee was tasked with a difficult decision.
Some might find focusing on revenue is the wrong way to frame
the debate. A main purpose of athletics is to appeal to the diverse
interests of students, generate school spirit and create competitive
outlets for top athletes in a wide range of sports. Athletics is important
as a major extracurricular arena.
Yet this is ultimately an issue of competitiveness — and thus rev-
enue. The theory goes as follows: If the University both cuts teams and
increases the athletics budget, more resources will be concentrated for
fewer teams. Therefore, teams can hire better coaches, recruit more
students who require financial aid and improve performance, which
in turn will increase revenue, mostly through alumni donations. This
is a risky and tenuous argument.
Calculating revenue streams for athletics is difficult. The University
quote of the day
has not released statistics on athletics revenue, because it is very hard
to ascertain how athletics are responsible for certain donations. It is
“The fact of the matter is that the committee’s report
was based on no facts.”
unclear if increasing the athletics budget will result in added revenue.
More importantly, though, raising the budget for athletics is a poor
use of important University resources.
These are extremely difficult economic times — Brown is attempt-
ing to jump-start its worthy Student Activities Endowment, students
have seen yet another tuition hike, and a plurality of them think the — Krista Consiglio ’11,
University’s highest priority should be increasing financial aid, accord-
ing to last month’s Herald poll. To increase the athletics budget by 10 See protestors on page 1.
percent — all the while delivering a huge blow to students, recruits,
coaches and alums by eliminating four teams — is problematic,
particularly given how unproven this revenue-generating logic is.
Even if it were certain that our athletic teams would become com-
petitive with increased funding, there are better ways to allocate this
money. We urge the Corporation to reconsider allocating funding to
an athletics budget and instead address Brown’s most pressing needs.

Editorials are written by The Herald’s editorial page board. Send comments
to editorials@browndailyherald.com.

t h e b r ow n da i ly h e r a l d
Editors-in-Chief
Deputy Managing Editors
Clarification
An article in yesterday’s Herald (“A step up — bird bones give hints of dino strides,” April 25) stated, “the lab
snips certain ligament or connective tissue, looking at ways the animals’ movement responds.” Such proce-
dures are only performed on cadavers.
Senior Editors

Corrections
Sydney Ember Brigitta Greene Dan Alexander
Ben Schreckinger Anne Speyer Nicole Friedman
Julien Ouellet
editorial Business
Kristina Fazzalaro Arts & Culture Editor General Managers Office Manager An article in yesterday’s Herald (“In ‘Monologues,’ vaginas take center stage,” April 25) incorrectly stated
Luisa Robledo Arts & Culture Editor Matthew Burrows Shawn Reilly that the Brown Monologues/Dialogues project was spearheaded by Raisa Aziz ’11.5. In fact, the project was
Rebecca Ballhaus City & State Editor Isha Gulati
Claire Peracchio City & State Editor spearheaded by Aida Manduley ’11. The Herald regrets the error.
Directors
Talia Kagan Features Editor
Aditi Bhatia Sales
Hannah Moser Features Editor
Danielle Marshak Finance Two photographs in yesterday’s Herald (“Ivy film fest brings out Sorkin, Franco,” April 25) were incorrectly
Alex Bell News Editor
Nicole Boucher News Editor
Margot Grinberg Alumni Relations attributed. The photograph of Aaron Sorkin was taken by Hilary Rosenthal, and the photograph of James
Lisa Berlin Special Projects
Tony Bakshi Sports Editor Franco was taken by Emily Gilbert. The article also identified Hannah Levy ’13 as the festival’s screenplay
Ashley McDonnell Sports Editor Managers
Ethan McCoy Asst. Sports Editor Hao Tran National Sales coordinator. In fact, Levy’s title is screenplay co-coordinator. The Herald regrets the errors.
Tyler Rosenbaum Editorial Page Editor Alec Kacew University Department Sales
Hunter Fast Opinions Editor Siena deLisser University Student Group Sales
Michael Fitzpatrick Opinions Editor Valery Scholem Recruiter Sales
C O R R E C T I O N S P olicy
Jared Davis Sales and Communications
Graphics & Photos Lauren Bosso Business Operations The Brown Daily Herald is committed to providing the Brown University community with the most accurate information possible. Corrections may be
Abe Pressman Graphics Editor Emily Zheng Business Analytics submitted up to seven calendar days after publication.
Alex Yuly Graphics Editor Nikita Khadloya Alumni Engagement C ommentary P O L I C Y
Stephanie London Photo Editor James Eng Special Projects
Hilary Rosenthal Photo Editor The editorial is the majority opinion of the editorial page board of The Brown Daily Herald. The editorial viewpoint does not necessarily reflect the views of
Arjun Vaidya Special Projects
Nick Sinnott-Armstrong Photo Editor The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Columns, letters and comics reflect the opinions of their authors only.
Webber Xu Special Projects
Jonathan Bateman Sports Photo Editor L etters to the E ditor P olicy
Post- magazine Send letters to letters@browndailyherald.com. Include a telephone number with all letters. The Herald reserves the right to edit all letters for length and clarity
Production
Kate Doyle Editor-in-Chief
Dan Towne Copy Desk Chief and cannot assure the publication of any letter. Please limit letters to 250 words. Under special circumstances writers may request anonymity, but no letter will
Gili Kliger Design Editor BLOG DAILY HERALD be printed if the author’s identity is unknown to the editors. Announcements of events will not be printed.
Anna Migliaccio Design Editor David Winer Editor-in-Chief
advertising P olicy
Katie Wilson Design Editor Matt Klimerman Managing Editor
The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. reserves the right to accept or decline any advertisement at its discretion.
The Brown Daily Herald
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
By Mike Johnson
Opinions Columnist
My four years at Brown have been a wel-
come experience of maturation, and like
fine wine and deliciously stinky cheese, the
school only improves with age. From the
moment wide-eyed first-years walk up the
impossibly steep College Street and through
the gaping Van Wickle Gates, there is some-
thing about the campus that changes their
impressionable young minds. Mine was no
different.
I went to a fairly liberal public school in
the middle of backwater New Jersey. The
Tea Party has a firm hold on the more ru-
ral areas of my county, and the congress-
man from my district makes U.S. Rep. Mi-
chele Bachmann, R-Minn., look like Karl
Marx. Yes, such a place actually exists, and
in the sleepy county unknown to absolute-
ly everyone besides some die-hard geolo-
gists and snowboarding fans — Danny Kass
was from there — we happily claim that we
have more livestock than people. For in-
stance, Walmart was a recent addition, to
much ado. Yet at my high school, we read
such scandalous books as “Catcher in the
Rye” and learned about contraceptive use in
health class.
When I came to Brown, I will admit my
worldview was downright barbaric com-
pared to that of the predominant commu-
nity already on campus. I knew I did not
approve of the past eight years of the Bush
administration, and I worked on President
By Ethan Tobias
Opinions Columnist
Swarms of prospective students descended
on campus this past week. Walking between
classes, I found myself doubling back to get
around groups of 50 or more high school-
ers, parents in tow, listening attentively to a
hoarse Brown student yelling ineffectively at
the top of his lungs.
Brown is a popular school — over 30,000
people apply — yet this week, the number of
potential Brunonians on campus skyrocket-
ed. What drove this sudden increase?
The simplest answer is that many high
schools in the Northeast were on break this
past week, precisely at the point when high
school juniors begin to seriously consider
where they are going to apply later this year.
But why should so many more high schools
have break now?
This week saw the celebration of both
Easter and Passover. In the spirit of ac-
commodating religious observances, it is
common for high schools, especially in the
Northeast, to time their spring breaks to co-
incide with these two holidays. Both Pass-
over and Easter are holidays that observ-
ers spend with family, often traveling out of
town. For observers of Passover, the restric-
tions against eating leavened bread make
eating at a school cafeteria all but impossi-
ble. In the best interest of both students and
teachers who would like to observe these
holidays without worrying about homework
or tests, giving time off for the week lead-
ing up to Easter — usually coinciding with
Thanks for all the fish
Obama’s campaign during the primary sea-
son. But I will be honest and say I was not
very accepting of gay marriage, nor was I
even aware of the myriad issues Brown stu-
dents tackle every day.
It is my belief that the university expe-
rience generally liberalizes. There are nota-
ble exceptions, of course, but those who at-
tend such universities attend them for that
particular reason — they are eddies in the
stream of liberalizing education. If the gen-
eral trend is to nudge eager young minds to
In an atmosphere where the dissenting viewpoint
is allowed to flourish and even become prevalent,
those in support of it have become zealots.
the left, the Brown experience is a gigan-
tic shove off the side of the cliff of conser-
vatism. And it is not a gentle feather’s ride
down.
My world was shattered. I met my first
homosexual classmate, and he was an all-
right guy. I met more Jewish classmates than
I ever had in high school, and met my first
Muslim classmates. To my impressionable
young mind, Brown was a place where all
these people could get together, learn about
the world and about one another and strive
to come together to meet the challenges of
an increasingly flat world.
By the time I signed on to write columns
‘Next year at home’
Passover — is a way of accommodating the
overwhelming number of religiously obser-
vant Americans.
Yet this sort of pragmatic calendar plan-
ning is all but lost on Brown. Despite its
large Judeo-Christian population, Brown
does very little to accommodate those who
want to observe Passover or Easter. Easter is
on a Sunday, so there is somewhat of an ex-
cuse there, but this year’s first Passover seder
was Monday.
For Jews, Passover is practically the
equivalent of Thanksgiving or Christmas. It
is a time when extended family and friends
Brown would never schedule classes on Thanksgiving
or Christmas but does not hesitate to schedule classes
on Passover, despite the fact that Jewish students make
up over 20 percent of students and that Passover is one
of the most widely observed Jewish customs.
come together to share in a meal intended
to cherish freedom. Brown would never
schedule classes on Thanksgiving or Christ-
mas but does not hesitate to schedule classes
on Passover, despite the fact that Jewish stu-
dents make up over 20 percent of students
and that Passover is one of the most widely
observed Jewish customs, with 79 percent of
American Jews attending a Passover seder.
Sure, most professors will accommodate
students and excuse absences for religious
observance, yet hundreds of Brown students
clearly felt they could not leave as shown by
the hundreds who attended the seders at
Opinions 7
for The Herald in my sophomore year, that
idyllic picture of the Brown landscape was
muddied so deeply that it became hard even
to remember it existed. Supporting Israel is
deemed apologist, supporting capitalism is
greedy and unethical and having even re-
motely positive feelings about the Reserve
Officers’ Training Corps on campus is to
align oneself with the brutal murdering ma-
chines of the U.S. armed forces. Even be-
ing religious has become demonized — the
outspoken atheists among us ridicule those
who believe in a higher power.
What I initially saw as a unifying atmo-
sphere has become a dictatorship of ideas.
In an atmosphere where the dissenting
viewpoint is allowed to flourish and even
become prevalent, those in support of it
have become zealots. While the opinions
expressed on campus have a right to be
heard and debated, the minority opinions
have a right to be considered.
Recently, the Coalition Against Special
Privileges for ROTC circulated a tableslip
that declared “Brown Says No!” to ROTC
on campus. I was confused because I was
not aware that “Brown” as a whole had spo-
Hillel.
Besides, it is not like Brown always sched-
ules classes on Passover. Last year, by coinci-
dence, the Passover seders fell over spring
break. Brown could adopt some pragmatic
sensibility in scheduling the academic year
with the flexibility to move spring break a
week or two to align with Passover and Eas-
ter.
Another sensible approach would be to
move spring break earlier in March to more
closely align with other universities — giv-
ing Brown students the chance to see friends
while home over break — while exchang-
ing the Presidents’ Day holiday in favor of
two days off for Passover and Easter. Hav-
ing a few days off for Passover and Easter
will also make it easier for parents of both
college- and high school-aged children to
schedule family vacations and provide a way
for Brown students to spend time with their
high school-aged friends.
Fortunately, the University has shown a
willingness to consider the religious obser-
vances of students in the past. Rosh Hasha-
nah, the Jewish new year, would have fall-
en on the first two days of school last fall.
Aware that shopping classes while trying to
ken. In fact, I was just recently filling out
the undergraduate survey on the topic. The
coalition does not speak for me. Nor does
any other student group on campus, for that
matter. What I have learned at Brown is that
I have a voice, as do we all, and here on Col-
lege Hill, we have an opportunity that not
everyone receives — we speak and expect to
be heard and have our opinions considered.
No student group gets to decide what
“Brown says” about anything, especially not
in such a fledgling stage of an important de-
bate. I recognize that I may be getting my
dander up more readily because I happen to
be on the other side of the question than the
folks in the coalition, but it does not change
the fact that to extinguish the opposition is
despotic and immoral.
In my four short years on campus, the
marketplace of ideas has unfortunately
closed for business, and it is threatening to
remove Brown as a place of enlightenment
and free discourse and place it in the du-
bious company of universities that do not
tolerate dissenters. Brown is a wonderful
place of vibrant diversity socially and eco-
nomically, forging the perfect environment
to create the leaders of tomorrow. Yet if we
keep demonizing our ideological counter-
parts and silencing those with whom we do
not agree, tomorrow’s leaders will be just as
ignorant as yesterday’s.
Mike Johnson ’11 will perform a double
backward somersault through a
hoop while whistling “The Star-
Spangled Banner” at graduation.
attend High Holiday services would have
been a huge conflict for the Jewish commu-
nity, the school year was pushed to begin
before Labor Day. There was still school on
Rosh Hashanah, but luckily, not the crucial
first two days.
This coming fall, there is an opportunity
for Brown to exercise the same kind of prag-
matic scheduling. Yom Kippur, the holiest
day in the Jewish calendar, on which Jews
are not permitted even to eat, falls on Fri-
day, Oct. 7. Yet rather than give us that day
off, which would be convenient for Brown’s
Jewish community, the University is choos-
ing to give us Oct. 10 — Columbus Day —
instead.
But since the University renamed the
weekend Fall Weekend, the nominal ties
to Columbus Day have been severed. If the
University really wanted to show the week-
end is something other than Columbus Day
by a different name, then it should give off
the Friday of Yom Kippur, not the Monday
of Columbus Day, thereby aiding a signifi-
cant minority of the student body and dem-
onstrating its support of Native American
grievances.
Since both holidays fall on precisely the
same weekend — and missing a day of class
on a Monday or a Friday is essentially the
same scheduling-wise, if not a little better
for students who have Monday seminars —
this would be a win-win for the school and a
good first start toward a pragmatic, consid-
erate approach to scheduling.
Ethan Tobias ’12 really just wants some
of that homemade matzo ball
soup. He can be reached at
Ethan_Tobias@brown.edu.
Daily Herald Sports Tuesday
the Brown
The Brown Taekwondo team traveled to the University of California at Davis for the national competition, where they
took home the top prize.
Taekwondo wins first national title
By Amy chen
Staff Writer
Twenty-five members of the Brown
Taekwondo team brought home
medals galore, trophies and, for the
first time, the national title at the
National Collegiate Taekwondo As-
sociation Championships April 9-10.
The national tournament at the
University of California at Davis
hosted more than 300 competitors
from 30 schools. The two-day event
included competitions for the color
belt division April 9 and black belt
division April 10. Competitions
were divided according to belt col-
ors, weight and gender.
Twenty-one Bears won medals,
and some took home more than
one.
For the past several years, the
club team has ranked among the top
three nationally, which put pressure
on the team to maintain its high
level of performance, said Bhuvic
Patel ’11, head instructor and coach.
Students who competed at the
tournament participated in a week
of intensive training over spring
Athletes join teams for love of the game, not money
By sam rubinroit
Sports Staff Writer
By accepting less than 9 percent of
its nearly 31,000 applicants, Brown
is able to pick and choose the best
and brightest from across the nation
and even around the globe. And
yet when recruiting elite athletes,
the University often finds itself at
a disadvantage. As a member of
the Ivy League, Brown is hindered
by strict academic requirements
and scholarship restrictions that
severely limit its pool of potential
athletes. So what makes an athlete
come to Brown?
Love at first sight
Athletes at Division I schools
choose their colleges based on a
variety of factors, such as a school’s
winning tradition, the potential
to win a national championship
or the reputation of a coach. But
athletes at Brown cited all these
reasons as secondary to the quality
of education and the atmosphere
on campus.
“First and foremost, it is a great
opportunity to get an Ivy League
education,” said Katie Hyland ’11,
break, focusing on forms and de-
fense.
“It had been a long journey to get
there,” said Karin Wefald ’13, who
won first place in the featherweight
division. “You had to mentally pre-
pare yourself for the experience.”
“At nationals, I just thought back
to how much I’ve trained,” said Lei
Ma ’13, who placed second in the
feather weight division. “No way I
was going to mess it up. I was over-
prepared. When we were there, we
were ready.”
Brown Taekwondo is the biggest
martial arts club on campus with
over 120 members, most of whom
did not start taekwondo until their
first year at Brown.
Alums also attended the compe-
tition to help out and drive students
around the area. “Seeing alumni
there, I saw how much of a group
effort it was,” Wefald said.
While training for nationals, stu-
dents traveled from campus to Mas-
ter Sung Sun Park’s ’99 taekwondo
center in Smithfield for additional
practices.
“He’s our master, and he decides
captain of the women’s field hockey
team. “Secondly, the girls here on
the team felt like my family from
the moment I met them. And then
the coaching staff. I knew I would
be in good hands as a freshman and
throughout my career with their
guidance.”
Young players may also choose
Brown over other athletic programs
because they will be able to make
an immediate impact rather than
ride the bench for their first years.
“The big thing I looked at in
my decision was being able to play
as a freshman and being able to
contribute early,” said Sean McG-
onagill ’14. “I considered Brown
strongly because they needed a
point guard, and it was a good op-
portunity where I could come in
and contribute right away.”
For many, the ability to get an
Ivy League education while playing
the sport they love is a dream come
true. But some athletes are not con-
vinced until they are exposed to the
campus for the first time.
“Initially, I was skeptical about
the type of atmosphere at Brown —
maybe it would be preppy, maybe a
little snobby,” said Niina Al-Hassan
Courtesy of Sung Sun Park
our curriculum and our training,”
Patel said. The national champion-
ship is also a “title representative of
his hard work,” he added. “Master
Sung Park shows a sense of the club’s
continuity.”
The many years of improvements
and commitment in the club have
contributed to this year’s win, Patel
said. Though the taekwondo pro-
gram started in the 1960s, the club
did not really become active until
the 1980s, he added. Since then, the
club has increased its membership
and become stronger each year.
“The club has been working to-
wards this place for a long time,”
Patel said.
“There was positive energy from
the first fight,” he said, and the com-
petitions following it continued to
build energy.
Now that the team has won the
championship, members hope the
program will gain more exposure
and widespread recognition, Patel
said. He said he hopes whenever
people speak of college and tae-
kwondo, they will think of Brown
and its role in the sport.
’14, who throws the javelin for the
track and field team and hails from
Pullman, Wash. “But when I came
for my official visit, I just fell in love
with it. I loved the campus. I loved
the people. And the academics were
important, but it wasn’t a competi-
tive nature.”
“I’m from California, and I just
love it here,” said Bailey Wendzel
’13 of the women’s volleyball team.
“There’s a great balance between
academics and athletics, but also
the vibe is just more cohesive to
who I am. There’s a feeling of be-
longing here.”
A different breed
Athletes at Brown are different
than those found at other institu-
tions, according to many coaches.
Most spoke of the “balance” that
players maintain between being
elite Division I athletes and dedi-
cated scholars.
“When I’m recruiting athletes,
they want the best of both worlds,”
said Danielle Griffiths, head coach
of women’s golf. “They are look-
ing for that balance. They want the
best education that they can have
in combination with golf.”
track and field
Squads hit the road,
compete separately
By James blum
Sports Staff Writer
The men’s and women’s track and
field squads split their forces this
weekend as a majority of the mem-
bers competed at Princeton’s Larry
Ellis Memorial Invitational, and a
small group of athletes traveled down
to Louisiana State University for the
Alumni Gold tournament. Both
meets were not scored, but Brown
kept its competitive spirit high.
At Princeton, Heidi Caldwell ’14
ran the 3000-meter in 9 minutes,
44.50 seconds for a second-place
finish. In the 5000m, Ari Garber
’13 earned 11th place with a time
of 16:48.72.
On the men’s side, Dan Lowry ’12
covered the 5000-meter in 14:16.27
to come in 18th.
John Spooney ’14 put together
two strong performances, finishing
second in the 200-meter dash and
seventh in the 100-meter dash. His
times were 21.41 seconds and 10.82,
respectively.
The seven athletes who traveled
down to Baton Rouge competed
mostly in field events. The sole ex-
ception was Samantha Adelberg ’11,
who represented Bruno on the track,
finishing eighth in the 800-meter
with a time of 2:08.73.
Everyone was “right around” a
personal record, said Michelle Eisen-
reich, director of men’s and women’s
track and field.
Rachel Biblo ’11 enjoyed a suc-
cessful day as she triple jumped 40
feet, 11 inches to finish third. She
also finished fourth in the long jump
with a leap of 19-4 3/4.
“The performance of the day goes
The same aspects of the Univer-
sity that appeal to a class valedic-
torian or a top violinist also draw
athletes. With its open curriculum,
welcoming atmosphere and gener-
ally relaxed state, Brown attracts a
specific type of athlete.
“Brown not being the HYP —
Harvard, Yale or Princeton — many
times the kids are more down to
earth,” said Diane Short, head
coach of women’s volleyball.
Because of the University’s lim-
ited athletic budget and position in
the Ivy League, it becomes virtually
impossible for coaches to appeal to
five-star recruits.
“We need to find that rare kid
who is a high-level basketball player
who also wants a high-level educa-
tion,” said men’s head basketball
coach Jesse Agel. “If you want to be
a professional basketball player, and
you’re good enough to play at the
top levels, that’s going to help you
to prepare to play professionally.
But if you want to be in business,
when it is all said and done, you
can’t find a better situation than
coming to Brown.”
As such, it becomes the coaches’
job to pitch the school rather than
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
to Rachel Biblo,” Eisenreich said.
“She had about a foot (personal
record) in the long jump and then
what I think is her second-best triple
jump ever.”
“I think I got some pretty solid
jumps that were competitive in the
Ivy League,” Biblo said. “I think I
just need to be more fluid and have
better acceleration.”
Victoria Buhr ’13 hurled the dis-
cus 157-6 and claimed third place.
Brynn Smith ’11 threw the hammer
197-6 for a second-place finish in
the hammer throw and launched
the shot 47-9 1/4 to finish fourth in
the shot put.
Bruno was well represented in
the javelin throw by Nicholas Keel-
ing ’14 and Niina Al-Hassan ’14,
who threw 215-8 and 142-10, re-
spectively. Keeling finished second
in the men’s competition, while
Al-Hassan finished third among
women.
The squads will send a small
number of athletes to the Penn Re-
lays this weekend, while the majority
of the team will remain home to host
the Brown Springtime Open.
Only two weeks remain until
the Ivy League Heptagonal Track
and Field Championships at Yale.
Last year, the women’s team came in
second overall, and the men’s team
finished third. Eisenreich said this
year the teams need to focus on re-
fining technique, improving speed
and resting.
“I think that the teams are really
excited to try to improve on their
performance at Heps from last year,”
Eisenreich said. “We’re expecting an
even larger contingent at regionals
and hopefully nationals as well.”
the athletic team.
“We have to sell Brown,” said
John Murphy, head coach of the
No. 6 women’s crew team. “If they
choose to row in college, they are
going to find that we have a good,
strong program, but I think the
main thing is they need to choose
Brown over some other school out
there. They really have to want to
be a part of the school.”
Money matters
If athletes choose to matriculate
at Brown, they must either cover
the costs themselves or rely on
need-based financial aid. The Ivy
League has an explicit ban on all
athletic scholarships, dating back
to the 1954 Ivy Group Agreement
stating, “Athletes shall be admitted
as students and awarded financial
aid only on the basis of the same
academic standards and economic
need as are applied to all other stu-
dents.”
The lack of money available to
athletes affects the recruiting pro-
cess for certain sports more than
others.
continued on page 5