0: Goo
t
0nE
>°11 <,°,°
11 1
P-a 00
14) 0
H H E- - keq;
-4t- eq0 & 0 4)
eg
C) 0: C) o C) +08 Z -H -Hl
0t
0H
4) c4 4)
cq 8
-H -Hu 00 C9 C', -HI
_4
4) a-
~q ci to 0 CO 4)
0cooo
C
04
C H40t-~H4q
000 C4O n0
eq i 4)
0 r--l TI 0~~~
Go 9
00 *., r 4)
0_4
11 SM
4) 4)
0
11 ++
- co
-H4 _R
z b
4) eq
4)
ge ofl
OotIC vt- 0
*.0E c-
eq
co
0
A s00
o Rq > E- co
O
zz 0 &O
.+ +6
6 o eqO
'o 04 csIC : R,4
4)
0 a.+ +9 tlQ tl. -H +1
z r-
C*1
l 4 4
P4- E-4
H q~ R t-L4 1 _-
1-- ;- *_ H eqPR
0 0
0 Q- P.
(O
0
00~~~~~
4)
o z -4 V so
_H
+* *~~~~00
4
o
-c H
H11 a U U
ecc P4
-40
4)
HV
z -.8
0 W+ +6. 1-
EZ-H -H V
S0
H--.
co ca R4
i1 00~~~~~ 4)
0 X0 c§ 11 *o .0 t
00
+6+66+6 0 0
ri 00R sA0 00
z co
~ e
m CO cq~~~~~~~~~~~4
~ 1-4~~~~~4 4) 0o P4R
-H +6+ 6+ 4)4
CFJd 0 oC
e e C
0e H -H040
zv
004e 05
_4) Z 04E c z %
0
$
sH
0- -
(D
EH 44-
4)0
4)
04
cd _ 1~
;. F-
*.
o. =
-.40.0 4)
&4) 4
0
4) Co
0 0.
0~ n
E-4
166 A. L. GREENBAUM AND C. N. GRAYMORE I956
Table 4. Levels of oxidized and reduced coenzyme I in the quadriceps muscle of normal rats
treated for 1 hr. with growth hormone (0-5 mg.) or insulin (0.25 unit)
Coenzyme I/g. wet wt. of muscle
No. of DPN DPNH Total
Treatment animals (.Lg.) (jig-) (pg.) DPN: DPNH
Control 8 284±13-5 46±3-14 330+11-0 6-48+0-69
Growth hormone 6 292±5-7 36±2-63 328±8-0 8-35±0-40
Insulin 6 273±12-6 37+2-11 310± 13-5 7-45±0-45
lowering of the level of DPNH, and a very much Chaikoff & Felts (1951) have shown that in the
smaller change in the DPN as compared with absence of insulin fat synthesis is low, while the
levels in the handled controls (shown in Table 2). presence of the hormone increases the rate of
As a consequence the DPN:DPNH ratio rises to carbon incorporation into fatty acids fivefold. In
3-48. Treatment of these diabetic animals with the present series of experiments we have found
growth hormone for 1 hr. causes a rise of both that diabetic rats have a preponderance of DPN, as
DPN and DPNH to normal levels with a more evidenced by a DPN:DPNH ratio of 3-48, and a
normal ratio of 2-2. decreased availability of hydrogen for fat syn-
In addition to the experiments described above, thesis. On the other hand, rats treated with
a few measurements were made of the levels of insulin have a DPN: DPNH ratio of 1-36 and hence
DPN and DPNH in the quadriceps muscle. have an increased capacity for fat synthesis. This is
Table 4 presents a summary of the results of these also in agreement with the views of Helnreich et al.
experiments. It is noticeable that while the level of (1954).
DPN is about 80 % of that found in the liver the In rats treated with pituitary growth hormone,
DPNH is only about 30 %; the ratio DPN: DPNH the correlation between the ratio DPN: DPNH and
in muscle is 6-48 as compared with a normal ratio of fat metabolism is not clear. The injection of
so
2-2 in liver. It was found, however, that with growth hormone for periods as short as 1 hr. or as
muscle, unlike liver, the level of DPNH was long as 7 days uniformly results in an increase of
extremely variable, and this, together with the DPNH and in a decreased DPN:DPNH ratio,
inaccuracies inherent in the meaurement of such conditions which on the Lynen formulation should
small values, makes these results of doubtful favour fat synthesis. It is well established, how-
significance. Even lower values of muscle DPNH ever, that rats treated with growth hormone over
have been reported by Jedeikin & Weinhouse the same time intervals have a greatly increased
(1955). These factors make it difficult to assess rate of fat oxidation (Greenbaum & McLean, 1953)
whether either growth hormone or insulin has any and a reduced rate of fat synthesis (Greenbaum &
effect on muscle coenzyme I levels. Glascock, unpublished work). If the hydrogen of
DPNH represents the reductive potential necessary
DISCUSSION for fat synthesis then clearly the hydrogen must be
generated outside the fatty acid cycle. According
Treatment of normal rats with insulin caused an to Recant (1952) glycolysis does not appear to be
increase in both DPN and DPNH, the latter being affected by growth hormone, and an increased
almost doubled. The DPN:DPNH ratio was glycolysis can therefore be discarded as a source of
decreased to 1-36. Diabetic rats, on the other hand, hydrogen. It seems much more likely that the
showed no change in the level of DPN, but a increased DPNH in growth-hormone-treated rats
profound faRl in DPNH to almost half of that found represents not much a potential for fat synthesis
so
in the control rats. The ratio of DPN:DPNH in but simply a result of fat degradation. Each tur
diabetic animals was 3-48. These results are entirely of the fatty acid cycle will lead to the reduction of
in agreement with those reported by Helmreich, 1 molecule of DPN by f,-keto reductase. Thus we
Holzer, Lamprecht & Goldschmidt (1954). The might expect a rise in the DPNH in conditions of
changes in reduced coenzyme I could be accounted increased fat degradation, conditions known to
for largely in terms of the effect of the hormone on exist in growth-hormone-treated rats. If this is
glyoolysis, which is probably a major source of true the level of DPNH in the liver of growth-
DPNH, in that the injection of insulin increases hormone-treated rats does not influence the
glycolysis whereas deprivation of the hormnone direction of the fatty acid cycle, but is simply a
decreases it. With insulin we have a situation reflexion of the way it is turning. In this context
which appears to conform with the view of Lynen the increase in DPNH found in growth-hormone.
(1952-53) that a high level of DPNH is necessary treated diabetic animals is of interest. The diabetic
for fatty acid carbon-chain elongation. Osborn, rat has a much reduced DPNH owing to the failure
Vol. 63 GROWTH HORMONE AND LIVER-COENZYME I LEVELS 167
of glycolysis, and the injection of growth hormone hormone-treated normal, (c) insulin-treated normal,
restores the level to normal. This effect is not (d) diabetic and (e) growth-hormone-treated
mediated by insulin, and there is no reason to diabetic rats, with periods of hormone treatment
believe it is due to any effect on glycolysis itself. It ranging from 1 hr. to 7 days.
therefore seems most probable that here the 2. Growth hormone has little effect on the DPN
source of hydrogen for the reduction of DPN is of normal rats but increases the level of DPNH.
from an increased fat catabolism. This effect is manifest at even the shortest time
Helmreich et al. (1954) have studied the relation intervals.
of liver DPNH and ketosis in starvation and in 3. Insulin increases both the DPN and DPNH,
diabetes, and have concluded that DPNH has an the latter to a greater extent.
antiketogenic affect in these animals. This relation- 4. Diabetes causes a profound fall in DPNH but
ship does not appear to apply to the ketosis induced this can be completely restored in 1 hr. by the
by pituitary growth hormone. Liver slices from injection of growth hormone.
rats treated for 24 hr. with growth hormone pro- 5. The relation of these changes to the rate
duce more than twice as much acetoacetate, with of fat synthesis in hormonally treated rats is
oleate as substrate, than do untreated controls discussed.
(Greenbaum & McLean, 1953), yet at this time We are indebted to the Agricultural Research Council
interval the level of DPNH is significantly raised for a grant to one of us (C.N.G.) during the tenure of
over the control level (Table 1), which is inexplic- which this work was done, and to the Royal Society for an
able in terms of the scheme of Helmreich et al. expenses grant (A. L. G.).
(1954), but readily explained in terms of the views
advanced above. REFERENCES
The foregoing results are difficult to reconcile
with Lynen's (1952-53) suggestion that the rate of Bruce, H. M. & Parkes, A. S. (1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44,
fat synthesis is determined by the level of DPNH. 491.
Although it seems most probable that a low Eichel, M. A. & Spirtes, H. J. (1954). Arch. Biochem.
DPN: DPNH ratio is necessary for fat synthesis, Biophys. 53, 309.
the extension of this, that a low DPN: DPNH ratio Green, D. E. (1954). Biol. Rev. 29, 330.
Greenbaum, A. L. (1953). Biochem. J. 54, 400.
would determine the direction of the fatty acid Greenbaum, A. L. & McLean, P. (1953). Biochem. J. 54,
cycle in favour of carbon-chain elongation, does not 413.
seem fully justified. There appear to be factors Hele, P. & Popjak, G. (1955). Biochem. J. 80, xxxii.
other than the availability of hydrogen which also Helmreich, E., Holzer, H., Lamprecht, W. & Goldschmidt,
exert some influence on the direction in which the S. (1954). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 297, 113.
cycle works. The mechanism by which growth Jedeikin, L. A. & Weinhouse, S. (1955). J. biol. Chem. 213,
hormone influences fat metabolism in favour of 271.
degradation is being further investigated.. Lynen, F. (1952-53). Harvey Led. p. 210.
Lynen, F. & Ochoa, S. (1953). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 12,
299.
SUMMARY Osborn, M. J., Chaikoff, I. L. & Felts, J. M. (1951). J. biol.
Chem. 193, 549.
1. Changes in the levels of oxidized coenzyme I Recant, L. (1952). Fed. Proc. 11, 272.
(DPN) and reduced coenzyme I (DPNH) have been Wilhelmi, A. E., Fishman, J. B. & Russell, J. A. (1948).
studied in the liver of (a) normal, (b) growth- J. biol. Chem. 176, 735.