Companies
Kamps Brot- und Backwaren (incl. Zimmermann)
KNL
Logi-K
Kamps IT
Relevant volumes:
KBB, Kamps IT, Logi-K 2006 = approx. 163 Mio€ (2006*)
KNL = approx. 33 Mio€ (2006*)
Locations/departments/users
52 locations:
z 16 plants KBB
z 7 plants KNL
z 2 holdings (KBB, KNL) with 7 – 8 departments
z 27 stand-alone depots KBB Logi-K
approx. 150 users
Timing
until end 2007/beginning 2008
* Source: Manual supplier analysis KBB and KNL 2006 by Purchasing (May 2007),
PUMA/TEO JHB Heiler Innovation Days Nov. 2008 2
To-be IM&S procurement processes
1. Indirect materials standardized
standardized by supplier, catalogue available, no single inquiries, rebate on list
price (e. g. spare parts, office material)
2. Indirect materials user-specified
2a (frame): standardized by Kamps, specified once (e. g. working clothes)
2b (single need): real single, individual need (e. g. special spare part to be
manufactured for Kamps)
3. Services (planned and unplanned)
3a (unplanned, frame): standardized by Kamps, specified once
(e. g. temporary work)
3b (unplanned, single need): real single need, specified individually
(e. g. cleaning of ceiling, consultancy)
3c (planned): fixed agreement for regular services
(e. g. pest control, regular cleanings)
4. Assets
(e. g. equipment and machinery)
5. Energy
(pipeline materials, e. g. current, gas, network)
7. Others
(grocery around the corner)
8. order not in system
(e. g. business travel, fuel)
PUMA/TEO JHB Heiler Innovation Days Nov. 2008 3
IM&S procurement strategy
Procurement processes matrix KBB
A C
B D
Remarks:
Size of bubbles represent turnover 2006,
Source of data: Manual supplier analysis KBB 2006 by Purchasing (May 2007), data are likely
to contain imprecise supplier allocation (if supplier supplies different material groups) KBB
Procurement strategy defined in Purchasing IM&S workshop May 24, 2007
PUMA/TEO JHB Heiler Innovation Days Nov. 2008 4
Summary
PUMA IM&S mission:
In order to contribute to achieve Kamps Supply Chain objectives,
Kamps Brot- und Backwaren, Kamps Nederland, Logi-K, Kamps IT
introduce an integrated, standard, efficient, effective procurement process
for all Indirect Materials & Services (excl. transportation)
for all locations/departments
in a central system
with a project team consisting of representatives of key stakeholders
until end 2007/first quarter 2008
by step-wise implementation of processes for material groups with biggest process-
related benefit
to be measured by
reduction in process time for standard portfolio
increase of total share of supplier invoices related to an order number in SAP-MM
increase of frame agreement utilization rate
reduction of total number of suppliers
reduction of inventory values
achievement of expected savings of 1% measured on a comparable basis in the
first year after implementation
2007
Project phase Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1st Q 2008
1. Project definition and organization
2. Analysis
3. Strategy/Concept
4. Implementation
Development stepwise
Pilot Tests stepwise
Roll-out stepwise
5. Staff Qualification/Training
6. Monitoring of success/support
7. Information & Communication
holiday periods DE/NL
1) Source: Invoices and volumes – Manual supplier analysis KBB 2006 by Purchasing
2) Source: Process times: As-is analysis by KBB/KNL plants in May 2007 for standard procurement of Indirect materials and services, including total invoice verification
process and a little estimated average per invoice for Central Purchasing activity) and monthly accrual process by plant managers and controlling
Ø minutes per invoice/order today 128 minutes (from 95 min. cleaning material to 178 min. spare parts)
Reporting
today
2007 2008
Project phase Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
1. Project definition
2. Internal analysis (processes, volumes, qualification)
3. External analysis (software, providers)
4. Concept
System availability
5. Implementation SRM + catalogue
6. Supplier integration KBB ongoing
7. Key and power user (multipliers) training/Integration test phase KBB
8. Pilot KBB (1 supplier, 1 department)
9. Roll-out KBB
10. Integration other departments KBB
11. Implementation Content Management (PCM)
TEO-Nutzungsrate
80 74
69
70 63
59
Bestellanteil %
60
50 41
37
40 31
30 26
20
10
0
Juni Juli Aug. Sep. Okt. Nov. Monate
Teo Gesamt in % 59 69 63 74
Nicht TEO 41 31 37 26
Veränderung
10 -5 11
zum Vormonat
Terminology:
MATIF + premium mix = ready to mill
+ transformation = flour price
Sensitivity:
± €10 swing has an effect
of 5.5M€/yr (550kt)