formly in all directions. A simple explanation for see the universe contracting and the temperature
this observation is that the space between the increasing. Roughly t ' 300, 000 years from the
galaxies is expanding isotropically. By the princi- start, the temperature has reached several thou-
ple of mediocrity—i.e., we do not live at a special sand degrees Kelvin. Electrons get stripped from
point in space—isotropic expansion about each the atoms, and the universe is filled with a hot
point implies homogenous expansion. Such a ho- plasma. Further back in time, at t ' 1 second, the
mogeneous and isotropic expansion can be char- temperature gets so high that the atomic nuclei
acterized by an overall scale factor a(t) that de- break up into their constituent protons and neu-
pends only on time. As the universe expands, the trons. Our knowledge of nuclear physics tells us
wavelength λ of freely propagating light is this happens at a temperature of 1010 ◦K. At this
stretched so that point let us stop going back and let time move for-
ward again. The story resumes with the universe
a(t0 )
(1) λ(t0 ) = λ(t) , filled by a hot, dense soup of neutrons, protons,
a(t)
and electrons. As the universe expands, the tem-
where t0 denotes the present day and t denotes perature drops. Within the first minute the tem-
the time when the light was emitted. Astronomers perature drops to 109 ◦K, and the neutrons and
define the redshift z as the fractional change in the protons begin to fuse together to produce the nu-
wavelength: clei of the light elements deuterium, helium, and
λ(t0 ) − λ(t) lithium. In order to produce the abundances seen
(2) z= .
λ(t) today, the nucleon density must have been
Since we expect atoms to behave the same way in roughly 1018 cm−3 . Today we observe a nucleon
the past, we can use atomic spectra measured on density of ∼ 10−6 cm−3 , which tells us the universe
Earth to fix λ(t) . Using equation (1), we can relate has expanded by a factor of roughly
the redshift to the size of the universe: (1018 /10−6 )1/3 = 108 . Using equation (4), we
a0 therefore expect the photon gas today to be at a
(3) a= . temperature of roughly 10◦K. George Gamow made
(1 + z)
this back-of-the-envelope prediction in 1946.
We have adopted the standard shorthand In 1965 Penzias and Wilson discovered a highly
a0 = a(t0 ) for denoting quantities measured today uniform background of cosmic microwave radia-
and a = a(t) for denoting quantities measured at tion at a temperature of ∼ 3◦ K. This cosmic
a generic time t . By measuring the redshift of an microwave background (CMB) is quite literally the
object, we can infer how big the universe was when afterglow of the big bang. More refined nucleo-
the light was emitted. The relative size of the uni- synthesis calculations predict a photon tempera-
verse provides us with a natural notion of time in ture of ∼ 3◦ K, and more refined measurements of
cosmology. Astronomers like to use redshift z as the CMB reveal it to have a black body spectrum
a measure of time ( z = 0 today, z = ∞ at the big at a temperature of T0 = 2.728 ± 0.010 ◦K. Typical
bang), since, unlike the time t , the redshift is a mea- cosmic microwave photons have wavelengths
surable quantity. roughly equal to the size of the letters on this
A photon’s energy E varies inversely with its page.
wavelength λ. A gas of photons at temperature T The CMB provides strong evidence for the ho-
contains photons with energies in a narrow band mogeneity and isotropy of space. If we look out in
centered at an energy E that is proportional to the any direction of the sky, we see the same mi-
temperature. Thus T ∼ E ∼ λ−1 , and the temper- crowave temperature to 1 part in 104 . This implies
ature of a photon gas evolves as the curvature of space is also constant to 1 part
T E λ0 a0 in 104 on large scales. This observed homogene-
(4) = = = =1+z. ity lets cosmologists approximate the large-scale
T0 E0 λ a
structure of the universe, not by a general space-
This equation tells us that the universe should time, but by one having well-defined spatial cross-
have been much hotter in the past than it is today. sections of constant curvature. In these Friedman-
It should also have been much denser. If no par- Robertson-Walker (FRW) models the spacetime
ticles are created or destroyed, the density of or- manifold M is topologically the product R × Σ ,
dinary matter is inversely proportional to the oc- where the real line R represents time and Σ rep-
cupied volume, so it scales as ρm ∼ a−3 . If no resents a 3-dimensional space of constant curva-
photons are created or destroyed, the number of ture.1 The metric on the spacelike slice Σ(t) at
photons per unit volume also scales as a−3 . How- time t is given by the scale factor a(t) times the
ever, the energy of each photon is decreasing in standard metric of constant curvature
accordance with equation (4), so that the energy
density of the photon gas scales as ργ ∼ a−4 . 1Even though elementary particle theory suggests the
Starting at the present day, roughly 10 or 15 bil- universe is orientable, both the present article and the re-
lion years after the big bang, let us go back through search program of the authors and their colleagues per-
the history of the universe. With time reversed we mit nonorientable universes as well.
k = +1, 0, −1. The sectional curvature is k/a(t)2, so current theories of the very early universe, in-
when |k| = 1 , the scale factor a(t) is the curvature cluding the inflationary paradigm. Vacuum energy
radius; when k = 0 , the scale factor remains arbi- with density ρΛ = 3Λ/8π G mimics the cosmolog-
trary. ical constant Λ, which Einstein introduced into
The function a(t) describes the evolution of the his field equations in 1917 to avoid predicting an
universe. It is completely determined by Einstein’s expanding or contracting universe and later re-
field equation. In general Einstein’s equation is a tracted as “my greatest blunder.”
tensor equation in spacetime, but for a homoge- In a universe containing only ordinary matter
neous and isotropic spacetime it reduces to the or- ( Ωγ = ΩΛ = 0 ), the mass density scales as
dinary differential equation ρ = ρ0 (a0 /a)3 . Substituting this into equation (5),
2 one may find exact solutions for a(t) . These solu-
ȧ k 8π G tions predict that if Ω < 1 , the universe will expand
(5) + 2 = ρ.
a a 3 forever; if Ω > 1 , the expansion will slow to a halt
Here G is Newton’s gravitational constant, ρ is the and the universe will recontract; and in the bor-
mass-energy density, ȧ = da/dt ; and we have cho- derline case Ω = 1 , the universe will expand for-
sen units that make the speed of light c = 1 . ever, but at a rate ȧ approaching zero. These pre-
The first term in equation (5) is the Hubble pa- dictions make good intuitive sense: under the
rameter H = ȧ/a , which tells how fast the uni- definition of Ω as the ratio 8π Gρ/3H 2 , Ω > 1
verse is expanding or contracting. More precisely, means the mass density ρ is large and/or the ex-
it tells the fractional rate of change of cosmic dis- pansion rate H is small, so the gravitational at-
tances. Its current value H0, called the Hubble con- traction between galaxies will slow the expansion
stant, is about 65 (km/sec)/Mpc.2 Thus, for exam- to a halt and bring on a recollapse; conversely,
ple, the distance to a galaxy 100 Mpc away would Ω < 1 means the density is small and/or the ex-
be increasing at about 6,500 km/sec, while the pansion rate is large, so the galaxies will speed away
distance to a galaxy 200 Mpc away would be in- from one another faster than their “escape veloc-
creasing at about 13,000 km/sec. ity”.
Substituting H = ȧ/a into equation (5) shows Cosmologists have suffered from a persistent
that when k = 0 , the mass-energy density ρ must misconception that a negatively curved universe
be exactly 3H 2 /8π G. Similarly, when k = +1 (resp. must be the infinite hyperbolic 3-space H3 . This
k = −1 ), the mass-energy density ρ must be greater has led to the unfortunate habit of using the term
than (resp. less than) 3H 2 /8π G. Thus, if we can “open universe” to mean three different things:
measure the current density ρ0 and the Hubble “negatively curved”, “spatially infinite”, and “ex-
constant H0 with sufficient precision, we can de- panding forever”. Talks have even been given on
duce the sign k of the curvature. Indeed, if k 6= 0 , the subject of “closed open models”, meaning fi-
we can solve for the curvature radius nite hyperbolic 3-manifolds (assumed to be com-
plete, compact, and boundaryless). Fortunately, as
(6) s s finite manifolds are becoming more widely un-
1 k 1 k derstood, the terminology is moving toward the fol-
a= = , k 6= 0 ,
H 8π Gρ/3H 2 − 1 H Ω−1 lowing. Universes of positive, zero, or negative
spatial curvature (i.e., k = +1, 0, −1 ) are called
where the density parameter Ω is the dimension- “spherical”, “flat”, or “hyperbolic” respectively.
less ratio of the actual density ρ to the critical den- Universes that recollapse, expand forever with
sity ρc = 3H 2 /8π G . zero limiting velocity, or expand forever with pos-
The universe contains different forms of mass- itive limiting velocity are called “closed”, “criti-
energy, each of which contributes to the total den- cal”, or “open” respectively. (Warning: This conflicts
sity: with topologists’ definitions of “closed” and
ρ ργ + ρm + ρΛ “open”.)
(7) Ω= = = Ωγ + Ωm + ΩΛ ,
ρc ρc
Messengers from the Edge of Time
where ργ is the energy density in radiation, ρm is In the early 1990s the COBE satellite detected small
the energy density in matter, and ρΛ is a possible intrinsic variations in the cosmic microwave back-
vacuum energy. Vacuum energy appears in many ground temperature, of order 1 part in 105 . This
small departure from perfect isotropy is thought
2The abbreviation Mpc denotes a megaparsec, or one
to be due mainly to small variations in the mass
million parsecs. A parsec is one of those strange units in-
distribution of the early universe. Thus the CMB
vented by astronomers to baffle the rest of us. One par-
photons provide a fossil record of the big bang. The
sec defines the distance from Earth of a star whose an-
gular position shifts by 1 second of arc over a 6-month field of “cosmic paleontology” is set for a major
period of observation. i.e., a parsec is defined by paral- boost in the next decade as NASA plans to launch
lax with two Earth-Sun radii as the baseline. A parsec is the Microwave Anisotropy Probe (MAP) and ESA, the
about three light-years. Planck Surveyor. These satellites will produce clean