Hakan ÜÇOK
Phenomenons2
Mutlak Düzenden Isınarak ve Yörüngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekamül Eden Evren ve İnsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.
PDF
23.04.2011, Cumartesi – 13:00
Makale: Phenomenons2
Yazan : Hakan ÜÇOK
Phenomenons 2
The Truth;
(23.04.2011 – 13:08)
It is a well known common sense and by some people ultimately known FACT (but officially kept “under raps”)
that, today we all are aware of the truth about the universe and how it DID NOT and COULD NOT HAVE happen. I
just don't understand, why this so called scientific thinking people (scientists), particularly Astrophysicists,
Theoretical Physicists and Quantum Physicists (at least the ones alive today), still persist on an outdated model, a
simple theory, an assumed hypothesis like Big Bang. For the common public and majority of some scientists
(maybe unaware of all the complicated details that leave and lead to a trail or believed truth in their
consciousness) the model indeed seems to be at first glance the best explanation of how the universe became
being. But at the second glance, one may not be that much convinced about all the assumptions that had to be
made (even fabricated) to make it (the model) what it is and how it is supposed to work today. All those
assumptions that make the model/theory relevant to the public ARE NOT facts, nevertheless it is being threatened
as kind of a (sometimes ultimate) “truth” by this public.
Revelations, Hoax or Truth?
Have you ever thought of the possibility that revelations might be truth or even just considered for a moment that
they may eventually be information for a possible (eventually) ultimate knowledge?
I am surprised of the behavior of science, not considering revelations as a possible source of knowledge , which
they should at least try to falsify*. Although there's another possibility of revelations to be disinformation, but this
has to be falsified like any other theory*. That is indeed not a very objective approach of science to information
that may eventually be ultimate knowledge. If there is even a little chance that it might be truth, why not using it?
For example:
Neither the Jews nor the Nazarenes will be pleased with you until you follow their creed. Say, "The guidance is
God's guidance." If you follow their wishes after the knowledge has come to you, then none can help or protect
you against God. [2:120]
Did those who reject not see that the heavens and the earth were one mass and We tore them apart? That We
made from the water everything that lives. Will they not acknowledge? [21:30]
When Our signs are recited to them, they say, "We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the same
thing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients!" [8:31]
The one who says to his parents: "Enough of you! Are you promising me that I will be resurrected, when the
generations who died before me never came back?" While they both will implore God: "Woe to you; acknowledge!
For God's promise is the truth." He would say, "This is nothing but tales from the past!" [46:17]
When Our signs are recited to him, he says: "Tales of the ancients!" [83:13]
These words have been revealed more than 1400 years ago and still we find persons on this world that are fitting
into what was described. The last 4 revelations I've listed above fit very well onto Hawking nowadays (May 2011).
What is it with science and religion?
Religion has its own rationality and science has its own rationality. What if their rationalities do not count until both
accept and respect each other? Whereas many religious rationalities even differ from each other. But they all
(most of them) meat at one common and single point: “Everything was/is created by A CREATOR !”
Many religions (except Islam) would go better if they could accept (re-considered) scientific approach. I do not
count Islam with the many religions, because Islam does already impose scientific approach from beginning to end
(at least Islam's holy book the Quran). Unfortunally the Quran isn't being read, preferably burned (by other
religious) and ignored by others (almost every scientist).
Science itself would go better and come finally to any conclusions if it would see revelations as eventual
information of truth, that shall become knowledge and would be very helpful to solve any problems. It is the
intention of religion, or should be at least, to help mankind solving any problems.
The Quran:
From the point of the Quran, there's no problem at all with the universe we are living in and we are able to
observe. All predictions do fit neatless into observations, as long as you interpret the revelations right. To interpret
the revelations right, you have to have the right intentions. The Quran would never mislead to any wrong action as
long as you have done the interpretations with the right intentions. What are those right intentions? Funny but,
you can't be aware of “the right intentions” unless you read the Quran. It teaches almost everything you need to
achieve reaching the and any truth. And indeed, it's (chronologically revealed) first verse teaches: “Read!”: