B-ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...

Hakan ÜÇOK
Phenomenons2
Mutlak Düzenden Isınarak ve Yörüngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekamül Eden Evren ve İnsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.
PDF
23.04.2011, Cumartesi – 13:00
Makale: Phenomenons2
Yazan : Hakan ÜÇOK
Phenomenons 2
The Truth;
(23.04.2011 – 13:08)
It is a well known common sense and by some people ultimately known FACT (but officially kept “under raps”)
that, today we all are aware of the truth about the universe and how it DID NOT and COULD NOT HAVE happen. I
just don't understand, why this so called scientific thinking people (scientists), particularly Astrophysicists,
Theoretical Physicists and Quantum Physicists (at least the ones alive today), still persist on an outdated model, a
simple theory, an assumed hypothesis like Big Bang. For the common public and majority of some scientists
(maybe unaware of all the complicated details that leave and lead to a trail or believed truth in their
consciousness) the model indeed seems to be at first glance the best explanation of how the universe became
being. But at the second glance, one may not be that much convinced about all the assumptions that had to be
made (even fabricated) to make it (the model) what it is and how it is supposed to work today. All those
assumptions that make the model/theory relevant to the public ARE NOT facts, nevertheless it is being threatened
as kind of a (sometimes ultimate) “truth” by this public.
Revelations, Hoax or Truth?
Have you ever thought of the possibility that revelations might be truth or even just considered for a moment that
they may eventually be information for a possible (eventually) ultimate knowledge?
I am surprised of the behavior of science, not considering revelations as a possible source of knowledge , which
they should at least try to falsify*. Although there's another possibility of revelations to be disinformation, but this
has to be falsified like any other theory*. That is indeed not a very objective approach of science to information
that may eventually be ultimate knowledge. If there is even a little chance that it might be truth, why not using it?
For example:
Neither the Jews nor the Nazarenes will be pleased with you until you follow their creed. Say, "The guidance is
God's guidance." If you follow their wishes after the knowledge has come to you, then none can help or protect
you against God. [2:120]

Did those who reject not see that the heavens and the earth were one mass and We tore them apart? That We
made from the water everything that lives. Will they not acknowledge? [21:30]

When Our signs are recited to them, they say, "We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the same
thing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients!" [8:31]

The one who says to his parents: "Enough of you! Are you promising me that I will be resurrected, when the
generations who died before me never came back?" While they both will implore God: "Woe to you; acknowledge!
For God's promise is the truth." He would say, "This is nothing but tales from the past!" [46:17]

When Our signs are recited to him, he says: "Tales of the ancients!" [83:13]
These words have been revealed more than 1400 years ago and still we find persons on this world that are fitting
into what was described. The last 4 revelations I've listed above fit very well onto Hawking nowadays (May 2011).
What is it with science and religion?
Religion has its own rationality and science has its own rationality. What if their rationalities do not count until both
accept and respect each other? Whereas many religious rationalities even differ from each other. But they all
(most of them) meat at one common and single point: “Everything was/is created by A CREATOR !”
Many religions (except Islam) would go better if they could accept (re-considered) scientific approach. I do not
count Islam with the many religions, because Islam does already impose scientific approach from beginning to end
(at least Islam's holy book the Quran). Unfortunally the Quran isn't being read, preferably burned (by other
religious) and ignored by others (almost every scientist).
Science itself would go better and come finally to any conclusions if it would see revelations as eventual
information of truth, that shall become knowledge and would be very helpful to solve any problems. It is the
intention of religion, or should be at least, to help mankind solving any problems.
The Quran:
From the point of the Quran, there's no problem at all with the universe we are living in and we are able to
observe. All predictions do fit neatless into observations, as long as you interpret the revelations right. To interpret
the revelations right, you have to have the right intentions. The Quran would never mislead to any wrong action as
long as you have done the interpretations with the right intentions. What are those right intentions? Funny but,
you can't be aware of “the right intentions” unless you read the Quran. It teaches almost everything you need to
achieve reaching the and any truth. And indeed, it's (chronologically revealed) first verse teaches: “Read!”:

Son Değişiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 1/2 - Phenomenons2

B-ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...
Hakan ÜÇOK
Phenomenons2
Mutlak Düzenden Isınarak ve Yörüngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekamül Eden Evren ve İnsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

96:0 In the name of God, the Gracious, the Compassionate.

96:1 Read in the name of your Lord who has created.
96:2 He created the human being from an embryo.
96:3 Read, and your Lord is the Generous One.
96:4 The One who taught by the pen.
96:5 He taught the human being what he did not know.
Which scientist could say anything controversial to these verses? In which rationality does it not fit? None! But the
point is, many of them are not even aware of it because they didn't read it... They kept their distance, to not being
seen as fools by the public. They take care merely of what people would say, than of what the truth really may be
or is. I see it as a kind of intentional purpose of science, denying revelations, so that we all get stuck on this
planet and do not mature (science calls it evolution) into what we were (intelligently) designed for.
Will you not consider, will you not acknowledge ?
Where you see randomness and uncertainty, I see intention and purpose.
Where you see evolution and mutation, I see maturing and evaluation.
You call it evolution with a huge source of billion years, whereas you can't be sure if it is what it looks.
Where you see explosion and expansion, I see creation and orbiting.
For you it may have no sense at all, for me it is to sense itself.
Where you are copying and repeating mindless, without using own intellect;
I believe, have faith and use intellect to read and understand what is given.
We all observing the same, it is the question of: “What we want to see, what we want it to be.”
You fear what it could be, I do not and know that it is with purpose and intention.
You fear death, I do not. I hope to achieve the knowledge useful after death.
You don't believe in hereafter, stuck into the material world and all that matters is matter.
No way to convince you of things you can't sense. Your unused intellect won't help you to understand what is
sense.
You keep digging into matter spending billions in search of God/-s, unaware or denying of: “There is no God/-s”.
You know that it needs a Creator to set up a whole universe, but can't accept that you are helpless, hoping for
help of the God/-s.
You are not reading nor accepting truth spoken words, but senseless words of the created, you like them much.
You call it rational and science without knowing the meaning of the words, that what you think is the truth will
leave you an orphan and alone.
You fear to fail in a limited life, but don't fear a life in the dark or fire of eternal.
You are not aware of the ancients life told to you so you may consider, but wherever you can you repeat their
glitter.
You don't want to consider and not acknowledge the truth, all you've needed has come and gone with your faith.
You call it “a tale” where there might be a truth, call it a truth where and whenever you can not proof.
Faith you say is ignorance and nonsense, don't you consider the senseless fabricated by yourself ?
Will you not acknowledge at least consider after reading this stuff, how can you hope that one day you'll find the
truth ?
You think you are thinking and haven't really done yet...
But wherever one says: “I think, so I am.” your applause is with them.
(23.05.2011, Monday – 11:00) *If you think this is a poem, you are wrong! It is indeed not...
(24.05.2011, Tuesday – 13:51) **It is a truly shocking circumstance to see, how “unaware” or “intentionally
ignorant” the western world is and behave, if it comes to “knowledge (information that eventually is right)” that
has it's source in the Quran. The Quran is being rigorously ignored, whereas any other, even the simplest mystic
religion, is being elaborated with and in every single detail. But there is hope that one day every single human
shall at least read the Quran once, because we can see that it is not just ignored anymore; People trying (and
having success) to burn it. I can't understand a mind burning a script just because it is from another religion, but
it will have the effect that it is not a subject of unawareness and ignorance anymore, no more. If there must be
feared something than it must be this. And yes, in this case we can say, that the Quran, as an (eventually)
ultimate and final revelation of A CREATOR, must be the ultimate truth, otherwise it would not have been so
blindly ignored and hatred. It is very obvious that the information and knowledge it is carrying could be of use one
day, for those who haven't read it yet. This leads me (and should you too) to some conclusions I have to come up
with, what actually is happening on this world. My conclusions would not interest anyone neither do I want to be
misunderstood (although it won't bother me...), as was the Quran. So I better keep my conclusions for myself.
But, what I had the chance of summarizing for myself, shall not be in vain hopefully. One day it may help
understanding the human mind better. For now, it is just a question of stubbornness beliefs, that may change any
time...
* Updated 23.05.2011
** Updated 24.05.2011
Look out for “Phenomenons 3” !

Son Değişiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 2/2 - Phenomenons2