Anda di halaman 1dari 40

ELE863/EE8501 VLSI Systems

Electrostatic Discharge Protection

GATE

BOND SOURCE

PAD

Fei Yuan, Ph.D, P.Eng.


Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Ryerson University
Copyright c 2009

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (1)


OUTLINE
• Introduction to ESD

• Principle Sources of ESD in ICs

• ESD Models

• ESD Protection Mechanisms

• ESD Protection Devices

• ESD Protection Circuits

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (2)


Introduction to ESD
• What is ESD ?

⊲ ESD - Electro-Static Discharge.

⊲ ESD is a transient discharge of static charge that arises from either


human handling or a machine contact.

⊲ Although ESD is the result of a static potential in a charged object,


the energy dissipated and damages made are mainly due to the
current flowing through ICs during discharge.

⊲ Most ESD damages are thermally initiated in the form of device /


interconnect burn-out or oxide break-down. The basic phenomenon
of ESD is that is a large amount of heat is generated in a localized
volume significantly faster than it can be removed, leading to a
temperature in excess of the materials’ safe operating limits.

⊲ ESD Damages

pn-junction may melt.

Gate oxide may have void formation.

Metal interconnects & Vias may melt or vaporization, leading to


shorts or opens.

⊲ Gate-oxide breakdown is another form of ESD damage.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (3)


Introduction to ESD (cont’d)
• Why is ESD Critical ?

⊲ The aggressive decrease in physical dimensions and increase in


doping in modern CMOS technology result in a significant decrease
in gate-oxide thickness and pn-junction width −→ Require less
energy and lower voltages to destroy MOS devices.

500

450

400

350

300
tox [A]

250

200

150

100

50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Lmin [µm]

Figure 1: Scaling of gate oxide thickness of MOS transistors.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (4)


Introduction to ESD (cont’d)

0.8

0.7

0.6
Junction depth [µm]

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
L [µm]
min

Figure 2: Scaling of junction depth of MOS transistors.

20
V Student Version of MATLAB
t1
Vox

15
Vt1, Vox [V]

10

5
20 40 60 80 100
Gate oxide thickness, t [A]
ox

Figure 3: Scaling of the breakdown voltage of gate oxide (Vox ) and the avalanche breakdown voltage
(Vt1 ) of pn-junctions.

⊲ The level of ESD stress, however, does not scale down with the
technology.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (5)


Principle Sources of ESD in ICs
• Human Handling

⊲ A person walking on a synthetic floor can accumulated up to 20 kV.


This voltage is discharged when the person touches an object that is
sufficiently at ground. Charge exchange occurs between the person
and the object in a very short time duration (10 ns - 100 ns). The
charging current is approximately 1A - 10A, depending upon the
time constant.

• Test and Handling Systems

⊲ Equipment can accumulate static charge due to improper


grounding. The charge is transmitted through ICs when it is picked
up for placement in test sockets.

• IC Itself is Charged During Transport / Contact


With Charged Objects

⊲ ICs remain charged until they come into contact with a grounded
surface (large metal plates /test sockets). Charge is discharged
through the pins of ICs. Large currents in the internal interconnects
can result in high voltage inside the devices which can cause
damage to thin dielectrics and insulators.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (6)


ESD Models
• Human Body Model (HBM)

⊲ HBM models the ESD of a human body.

⊲ Peak current ≈ 1.3A, rise time ≈10-30ns.

Human body model

R=1.5kW

VC (0 - ) C=100pF DUT

Figure 4: Equivalent circuit of the human body model of ESD. The switch closes upon an ESD event.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (7)


ESD Models (cont’d)
• Machine Model (MM)

⊲ MM models the ESD of manufacturing / testing equipment.

⊲ Peak current ≈ 3.7A, rise time ≈15-30ns, bandwidth ≈ 12 MHz.

Machine model

VC (0 - ) DUT
C=200pF

Figure 5: Equivalent circuit of the machine model of ESD. The switch closes upon an ESD event.

⊲ ESD stress caused by charged machines is sever because of zero


body resistance. Most ESD protection circuits can only protect
HBM and MM.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (8)


ESD Models (cont’d)
• Charge Device Model (CDM)

⊲ CDM models the ESD of charged integrated circuits.

⊲ Inductance in the model is mainly due to the inductance of bond


wires.

⊲ Peak current ≈ 10A, rise time ≈1ns.

⊲ Gate oxide breakdown is the signature failure of CDM stress, in


contrast to the thermal failure signature of HBM and MM stress.

⊲ CDM stress has the fastest transient and has the max. peak current.

⊲ CDM stress is the most difficult ESD stress to protect against.

Charged device model


R<10 W L<10 nH

DUT

Figure 6: Equivalent circuit of charged device model of ESD. The switch closes upon an ESD event.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (9)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
• Current Limiting Characteristics of n-well Resistors

• Impact Ionization

• Avalanche Multiplication of pn-junctions

• First Breakdown (Avalanche Breakdown) of nMOS

• Second Breakdown (Thermal Breakdown) of nMOS

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (10)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
• Current Limiting Characteristics of n-well Resistors

⊲ Conductivity

⊲ Majority charge carriers in n-well resistors are free electrons.

⊲ At low voltages, the velocity of free electrons (majority charge


carriers) and that of holes (minority charge carriers) in a n-well
resistor are linearly proportional to the field intensity of the applied
electric field −→ a linear resistor with a constant resistance.

vn = µn E, vp = µp E, (1)

where vn and vp are the velocity of free electrons and that of holes,
respectively, µn and µp are the bulk mobility of free electrons and
holes, respectively.

⊲ The total charge crossing a cross-section of area A per second is


given by

Q = (vnn + vp p)Aq, (2)

where n and p are the concentration of free electrons and holes,


respectively, and q is the charge of an electron.

⊲ The current density is obtained from

Q
J= = (nµn + pµp )qE = σE, (3)
A
Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (11)
where

σ = (nµn + pµp )q (4)

is the conductivity.

⊲ Current Density

⊲ For n-type, the concentration of free electronics is approximately


the doping of the donors, i.e. n≈nn , where nn is the doping of
donors, we have vn≈µn E. Consequently

J≈Jn = (nnµn E)q = nn vn q = σE (5)

J is linearly proportional to E or equivalently the voltage across the


semiconductors.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (12)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
⊲ Velocity Saturation

⊲ At high voltages, the velocity of free electrons saturates due to the


increasing collision with silicon lattices. As a result, the current
through n-well resistors remains nearly constant regardless of
voltage increase

Jsat = nn vn,satq (6)

vn,sat ≈107cm/s, nn = 1017/cm3 −→ Jsat = 1.6×105A/cm2.

vn
Ohmic region Saturation region
v
sat
(10 7 cm/s)

0 4
10 V/cm E

Figure 7: Velocity saturation

⊲ n-well resistors exhibit a large resistance in the saturation region


shown above.

⊲ n-well resistors in the saturation region can be used as


current-limiting devices for ESD protection by limiting the amount
of ESD discharging current that can pass through the devices.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (13)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
• Avalanche Multiplication in pn-junctions

⊲ When a pn-junction is reverse biased, the reverse current (leakage


current) is solely due to (i) the movement of thermally generated
charge carriers in the depletion region and (ii) the diffusion of
charge carriers in the neutral regions.

⊲ When the reverse biasing voltage exceeds Vsat = 105V/cm, the


carriers in the depletion region can impart enough energy in the
collision with the silicon lattices to generate electron-hole pairs,
which become free charge carriers. These charge carriers are then
accelerated, collide with the silicon lattices, and create more free
charge carriers −→ Avalanche Multiplication.

Strike the covalent bond


and destroy it

Free electron -
Si Si Si
- Holes
Hole
-
Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si

Covalent bonds
Si Si Covalent bond Si
destroyed

Figure 8: Avalanche multiplication

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (14)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
• Avalanche Breakdown of nMOS

⊲ Parasitic Lateral Bipolar Transistor in nMOS

PAD
G
D S
p+ n+ n+
Isub

Rsub VB

p-substrate
Figure 9: Parasitic lateral BJT in nMOS transistors.

⊲ nMOS is used as ESD protection devices.

⊲ Gate is grounded to ensure nMOS is off under normal operation


conditions.

⊲ Drain-substrate/source-substrate pn-junctions are reverse biased.

⊲ A parasitic lateral BJT as shown exists in the substrate.

⊲ Under normal operation conditions, this parasitic BJT is off


because both the pn-junctions of the nMOS transistor are reverse
biased −→ Isub = 0, −→ VB = 0.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (15)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
⊲ Avalanche Breakdown of Drain pn-junction of nMOS

⊲ When VD increases, the electric field across the drain-substrate


depletion region becomes high enough such that avalanche
multiplication occurs at the drain-substrate junction −→ free
electron-hole pairs are generated.

⊲ The generated free electrons go to the drain due to its high


potential, whereas the generated holes go to substrate due to its low
potential −→ It gives rise to Isub −→ The base potential
VB = Rsub Isub is increased subsequently.

⊲ When VB is sufficiently high, the source-substrate pn-junction


becomes forward biased −→ electrons in the source (emitter) are
emitted to the substrate (base) −→ the parasitic lateral BJT is ON
−→ Avalanche Breakdown of MOSFETs −→ Static charge on pads
is discharged via the BJT to the ground. Current capacity is
determined by the width of the MOSFETs (the width of the BJT).

⊲ The turn-on time of the parasitic BJT is determined by the base


transit time (τb = 250ps for 1 µm channel length).

⊲ Note the fundamental differences between the parasitic BJT and


normal BJTs. The base width of the parasitic BJT equals to the
channel length of the nMOS transistor (in the range of µm),
whereas that of a normal BJT is very small (in the range of Å) −→
This BJT has a small current gain as the emitter and collector have
the same dimension.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (16)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
⊲ Snapback

ID
Thermal
breakdown
region

(Vt2 , I t2 )
Thermal
breakdown Snapback region
(ESD protection
operation region)
Slope=1/R sh
Avalanche
breakdown

Vsh (Vt1 , I t1 ) VD

Figure 10: Avalanche breakdown, snap back, and thermal breakdown of nMOS transistors.

⊲ When the BJT is ON, more electrons flows from the source to the
drain −→ ID ↑ and VD decreases sharply until the snapback holding
voltage Vsp is reached. The snapback holding voltage is mainly
across the drain-substrate pn-junction. The marginal increase of the
drain voltage is due to voltage drop across the drain diffusion,
source diffusion, and contact resistance.

⊲ During snapback, the resistance has positive temperature


coefficients. This implies that if the current in any region increases,
the temperature of the region will increase, thereby increasing the
resistance, which encourages the current to flow elsewhere −→
current is conducted uniformly by all figures of nMOS transistors.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (17)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
• Thermal Breakdown of nMOS

⊲ During snapback, the current of nMOS increases with the external


voltage VDS .

⊲ If VDS continues to increase, the device enters the thermal


breakdown −→ with the onset of the thermal breakdown, the
resistance of the current path has negative temperature coefficients,
encourages current to concentrates in certain localized fingers of
nMOS and eventually destroys the fingers.

⊲ The concentration of ESD current into a few fingers indicates that


no matter how many fingers are used, only a few will be activated
in case of an ESD strike −→ ESD current capability of the device
does not scale with its size.

⊲ To enhance the self-protection of ESD protection devices, the


current must flow UNIFORMLY in all fingers of ESD protection
devices.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (18)


ESD Protection Mechanisms (cont’d)
• Avalanche Breakdown versus Thermal Breakdown

⊲ If the avalanche breakdown voltage of ESD protection devices is


LESS THAN their thermal breakdown voltage, then the avalanche
breakdown occurs before the thermal breakdown −→ ESD stress
will be released by the avalanche breakdown and the devices will
not enter the thermal breakdown.

⊲ If the avalanche breakdown voltage of ESD protection devices is


GREATER THAN their thermal breakdown voltage, the avalanche
breakdown will occur at a voltage higher than the thermal
breakdown voltage. After the avalanche breakdown occurs, VDS will
still higher than the thermal breakdown voltage −→ the devices will
enter thermal breakdown and concentrate currents in a localized
area due to negative temperature coefficients −→ device will be
destroyed.

ID ID

Thermal
breakdown

Thermal
breakdown

Avalanche Avalanche
breakdown breakdown

Vsp Vt1 < Vt2 VD Vsp Vt2 < Vt1 VD

(A) Avalanche breakdown voltage is less than (B) Avalanche breakdown voltage is greater then
thermal breakdown voltage thermal breakdown voltage

Figure 11: Avalanche breakdown/thermal breakdown voltages

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (19)


ESD Protection Devices
• n-well Resistors

• Gate-Grounded nMOS Transistors (GGNMOS)

• Gate-Coupled nMOS Transistors (GCNMOS)

• Silicon Controlled Rectifiers (SCR)

• Medium Voltage Triggered SCR

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (20)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• n-well Resistors
M1 M1
M1 M1
SiO2 Poly
SiO2
SiO2
N-well

P-substrate P-substrate
n+
Poly-resistor N-well resistor

Figure 12: Poly and n-well resistors

⊲ Poly-resistors in general should not be used as ESD protection


devices due to their poor heat dissipation capability (Poly resistors
are isolated from the substrate by the SiO2 layer). Note that the
heat generated by ICs is taken away via two paths (i)
PADs/traces/pins and (ii) substrate/ground plate.

⊲ n-well resistors have a good contact with the substrate. They are
used as primary current-limiting devices.

⊲ When a n-well resistor is used as the current-limiting device,


together with a nMOS (primary ESD protection device), it is
essential to make sure that the n-well resistor will not enter its
thermal breakdown when the nMOS is in its avalanche breakdown.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (21)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Diodes
n-well
p+ n+
pn-junction
Rn-well

p-substrate
p+/n-well diode
(a) p+/n-well diodes
Internal
PAD circuits

n+ p+ p-well n+/p-well diode

R p-well

p-substrate

(b) n+/p-well diodes

Figure 13: Diodes in CMOS. (a) p+ /n-well diodes; (b) n+ /p-well diodes; (c) ESD protection using
diodes.

⊲ Two main types of diodes : n+ /p-well diodes and p+ /n-well diodes.


p+ /n-well diodes have a pn-junction between the n-well and
p-substrate whereas there is no isolation between the diode and the
p-substrate in n+ /p-well diodes.

⊲ When forward-biased, diodes can sustain a large current with a


small device dimension.

⊲ Diodes are widely used for ESD protection at radio frequencies due
to the small junction capacitance, which has a less impact on the
bandwidth of RF circuits.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (22)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Gate-Grounded nMOS Transistors

PAD

D G S

DS SS

n+
RD RS

R sub
p-substrate

Figure 14: Drain contact-gate spacing (DS) and source contact-gate spacing (SS) of ESD protection
nMOS transistors.

⊲ During a ESD strike, the pn-junction at the drain undergoes an


avalanche breakdown. Holes flow to the substrate, resulting in an
increase in VB −→ parasitic BJT will be turned on −→ ESD
current flows from the collector the (drain of nMOS) to the emitter
(the source of nMOS that is connected to the ground) −→ ESD
stress at the drain of the nMOS transistor (PAD) is released.

⊲ The dimensions of ESD nMOS should be large enough to handle


large ESD currents −→ multiple fingers structure is used to
implement ESD nMOS.

⊲ The main design parameters of nMOS are (i) channel length, (ii)
drain contact-to-gate spacing, and (iii) device width. The source
contact-to-gate spacing is not critical and is kept at its minimum
design value.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (23)


i) The minimum channel length is good for efficient turn-on but the
punch-through limit will be reduced.

ii) Drain contact-to-gate spacing affects the resistance of ballast


resistors. For silicided processes, the minimum drain contact-to-gate
spacing is used.

iii) Device width determines the maximum current that the device
can conduct.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (24)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Gate-Grounded nMOS Transistors (cont’d)

n-well ballasting
D
resistor

Contact/via

n+
1 2 3 4

G
S
Metal-2 Metal-1

Figure 15: Lumped ballast resistors are added at the drains to ensure a uniform ESD current distri-
bution among the fingers of ESD protection transistors.

⊲ During an avalanche breakdown, the current flowing through the


drain increases. However, the positive temperature coefficient of the
resistance of n+ -diffusion (called Ballast Resistors) at the drain
prevents current from concentrating in a localized region −→ it
forces the ESD current to flow into other fingers −→ uniform
current distribution is achieved.

⊲ The effect of n+ -diffusion resistance is virtually eliminated in


silicided CMOS processes because in these processes n+ is silicided
and the resistance of silicided n+ is small (a few ohms).

⊲ To preserve the current-limiting ability of ballast resistors, explicit


n-well ballast resistors at the drain are added. Note that the sheet
resistance of n-well is much higher than that of n+ -diffusion.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (25)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Gate-Coupled nMOS Transistors

⊲ In most applications, the gate of ESD nMOS is grounded to ensure


that the ESD nMOS will not cause any extra leakage at the pin
during normal operation (Without ESD).

⊲ The avalanche breakdown voltage is reduced if the gate of nMOS is


properly biased during a ESD strike.

⊲ The gate voltage helps reduce the width of the pn-junction at the
drain −→ increase the electric field in the junction and lower the
avalanche breakdown voltage of the junction.

⊲ The value of C and R must be such that (i) they have no effect on
the operation of the circuit when there is no ESD stress, (ii) they
must couple a sufficient voltage to the gate during a ESD strike
such that the avalanche breakdown voltage of nMOS is effectively
reduced.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (26)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Gate-Coupled nMOS Transistors (cont’d)

Internal PAD
V circuits
DS C
(Avalanche
breakdown
voltage)
R

VG

ID

Thermal breakdown

Reduced avalanche breakdown


Avalanche breakdown

VD
Vsp

Figure 16: Gate-coupled nMOS

⊲ C behaves as a short-circuit for ESD strikes (high frequencies).

⊲ Gate voltage helps reduce the width of the pn-junction at the drain
(connected to the pad) as the potential of the substrate underneath
the gate oxide is increased −→ drain pn-junction will undergo an
avalanche breakdown at a lower junction voltage −→ ESD
protection occurs at a lower drain voltage (better ESD protection).

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (27)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
⊲ Drawbacks of nMOS-based ESD Protection

⊲ Effective for non-silicided processes. Less effective for silicided


processes.

⊲ Need additional ballast n-well resistors to increase ESD protection.

⊲ Need gate-coupling circuitry to improve ESD protection.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (28)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Silicon-Controlled Rectifiers (SCR)

Internal PAD
circuits
pn-junction

p+ n+ n+ p+
Rnwell
T1 T2
n-well

Rsub Ic2
p-substrate

Figure 17: Silicon-controlled rectifiers (SCRs).

⊲ Under normal operation, the pn-junction between n-well and


p-substrate is reverse biased and SCR has no effect on the operation
of the protected circuits.

⊲ During a ESD strike, the pn-junction between n-well and substrate


undergoes an avalanche breakdown −→ currents flow from n+
through Rnwell to the substrate −→ a sufficient voltage drop across
Rnwell turns on T2 −→ a large current flows from p+-diffusion
through Rsub to the ground −→ T1 turns on −→ T1 and T2 latch
up to release ESD stress.

⊲ SCR has a high ESD breakdown voltage (≈40V with the latch-up
time ≈1ns) as compared with that of nMOS because the breakdown
voltage of n+/p-sub is lower than that of n-well/p-sub (large
pn-junction width) −→ internal circuits might have already been
destroyed even before ESD protection circuits are activated.

⊲ SCR is not affected by silicidation −→ attractive for modern CMOS


processes where silicidation is common.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (29)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Medium-Voltage Triggered SCR

⊲ An additional n+ is added at the edge of the n-well to reduce the


junction width.

n+-diffusion
Internal PAD
is added
circuits

p+ n+ n+ n+ p+
Rnwell
T1 T2
n-well

Rsub Ic2
p-substrate

Figure 18: Modified silicon-controlled rectifiers (MSCRs).

⊲ During an ESD strike, pn-junction in this region undergoes an


avalanche breakdown at a LOWER voltage.

⊲ Breakdown voltage : 25V for 0.35µm CMOS (40V for conventional


SCR).

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (30)


ESD Protection Devices (cont’d)
• Low-Voltage Triggered SCR

⊲ An additional n+ is added at the edge of the n-well to reduce the


junction width.

Grouded-gate Internal PAD


is added circuits

p+ n+ n+ n+ p+
R nwell
T1 T2
n-well

Rsub Ic2
p-substrate

Figure 19: Low-voltage silicon-controlled rectifiers (LVTSCRs).

⊲ The added gate-grounded nMOS enters avalanche breakdown first.

⊲ Avalanche voltage is similar to gate-grounded nMOS (10V


approximately).

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (31)


ESD Protection Circuits
• Requirements of ESD Protection Circuits :

⊲ Provide a low-impedance path from input pads to the ground during


an ESD strike to release the static charge accumulated on the pads.

⊲ Clamp the voltage of the pads at a level that is below the dielectric
breakdown voltage of thin transistors during an ESD strike.

⊲ Provide a very high impedance and a low capacitance during


normal operation such that it has a little effect on the operation of
the protected circuits.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (32)


ESD Protection Circuits
• Basic Configuration

Primary ESD Current Secondary ESD


Internal
PAD Elements limiting Elements
circuits
resistor

Figure 20: Configuration of ESD protection circuits

⊲ Primary ESD protection elements shunt most of ESD currents.


Primary ESD protection elements have large width and need more
time to turn on.

⊲ Secondary ESD protection elements serve to limit the voltage at the


circuit being protected until the primary ESD protection devices are
fully operational. Secondary ESD protection devices have smaller
width.

⊲ The effectiveness of the primary ESD protection devices is


determined by the secondary protection stage. Note that due to the
small dimensions, the secondary protection devices enter avalanche
breakdown before the primary protection devices are activated. It is
critical to ensure that the avalanche breakdown of the primary
protection devices is activated before the secondary protection
devices enter their thermal breakdown so that the secondary ESD
protection devices will not be destroyed by ESD stress.

⊲ Current-limiting resistor has two functions (i) limit the current


flowing into the internal circuits. (ii) withstand some ESD voltage
so that the secondary protection circuit will not be damaged in an
ESD strike.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (33)


ESD Protection Circuits (cont’d)
• Basic Circuits

R
Internal
PAD circuits
Current-limiting
resistor

Primary ESD elements Secondary ESD elements

Figure 21: Basic ESD protection circuits

⊲ Both nMOS and pMOS are used for positive and negative ESD
strikes.

⊲ Under normal operation conditions, ESD devices are off −→


minimize the leakage current of these devices.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (34)


• ESD of 0.35µm CMOS Processes

⊲ In sub-micron CMOS, the onset of damage has been observed at


between 1 kV and 2kV.

⊲ Design rules are set for 2 kV HBM and 200V MM.

⊲ Min. resistance of the isolation n-well resistor : 200 Ω.

⊲ Soft-pull is used to balance the breakdown voltage and the speed of


I/O fingers under ESD zapping.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (35)


ESD Protection Circuits (cont’d)
• Distributed ESD Protection Circuits

⊲ De-centralize a large capacitance into a set of small capacitances


separated by inductors - a transmission line is constructed −→
capable of transmitting high-frequency signals.

zo zo zo zo
PAD Internal
circuits

z in

zo zo zo zo
PAD Internal
circuits
C C C C

Figure 22: Top - Distributed ESD protection with equal sections; Bottom - small-signal equivalent
circuit.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (36)


ESD Protection Circuits (cont’d)
• Multi-Finger Turn-On (MFT)

⊲ Thermal breakdown voltage of each finger of a large ESD protection


transistor is made higher than the avalanche breakdown voltage of
the finger.

⊲ Lumped resistors are added at source and drain. The one at drain
functions as ballast resistors while the one at source sense the ESD
current and generates a voltage that is applied to the gate of the
adjacent finger −→ behave as a gate-coupled nMOS transistor −→
to initiate ESD protection earlier, better ESD protection.

PAD Internal
Rd Rd Rd Rd circuits

Rs Rs Rs Rs

Figure 23: Equivalent circuit of poly back-end ballast with segmentation.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (37)


ESD Protection Circuits (cont’d)
• Soft-Ground-Gate nMOS MFT

⊲ Based on substrate pick-up technique −→ when an ESD strike


occurs, the potential of substrate increases because ESD currents
flow to the substrate. The gate potential increases subsequently −→
behaves as gate-coupled nMOS transistor that have a low avalanche
breakdown voltage (better ESD protection).

PAD Internal
Rd Rd Rd Rd circuits

Rs Rs Rs Rs

Figure 24: Equivalent circuit of a soft-grounded-gate nMOS MFT.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (38)


ESD Protection Circuits (cont’d)
• Domino nMOS MFT

⊲ Lumped resistors are added at source and drain. The one at drain
functions as ballast resistors while the one at source sense the ESD
current and generates a voltage that is applied to the gate of the
adjacent finger −→ behave as a gate-coupled nMOS transistor.

PAD Internal
Rd Rd Rd Rd circuits

Rs1 Rs1 Rs1 Rs1

Rs2 Rs2 Rs2 Rs2


Macro-ballasting
resistors

Figure 25: Equivalent circuit of domino nMOS MFT.

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (39)


References
⊲ For details on ESD protection and references, please read Chapter 8
of CMOS Current-Mode Circuits for Data Communications (Fei
Yuan, Springer : New York, 2007).

Copyright (c) F. Yuan 2009 (40)

Anda mungkin juga menyukai