Catholic Church
on the Discredited Field of "Human
Sexuality" and on Sexology Advisors
Whose "Scientific" and Moral
Foundation Deviates Radically From
That of the Church
by
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.
The Institute for Media Education 6 2002
A WORK IN PROGRESS
"'
Excerpted kom NAMBLA (The North American Man/Boy Love Association) "The Case for Abolishmg the Age of
Consent Laws" in The Age Taboo, Ed. Daniel Tsang, Gay Men's Press, Boston, 1981 p. 96.
Statement by Dr. John Money, co-founder with Dr. Fred Berlin of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic-the
premier clinic that couflsels Catholic bishops, pedophiles and pederasts. Final sentence in "Interview:John
Money" in Paidika: The Journal ofPaedophilia, Spring 1991, p. 13 (see attachment 12 for the full interview).
Dr. Fred S. Berlin, John Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, advertising his bainingprogram "The Cycle of Sexual
Trauma," in the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
February 10-12, 1994 (see attachment 10 for more detail).
Attachment 6: Dr. Pomeroy, Kinsey's Co-AuthorISex Partner Directs IASHS "Course Work"
"Pomeroy Was IASHS Academic Dean and Kinsey's Lover"
Some Examples of The Kinsey Team Animus Toward Catholicism
'
NOTE: Witnesses and admissible documentation for a potential Church legal action against fraudulent sex
scientists for medical malpractice are found tl~rougkoutthis document.
Fax916 7972544
drjudithreisman.org
July 20,2002
His Holiness Pope John Paul I1
Apostolic Residence
Vatican City State
Europe
Your Holiness:
Greetings from one of your many admirers in California.
"Scientific" sexology has displaced Judeo-Christian ethics as the authority on sex in our
American universities, medical schools, law schools and public schools, from kindergarten
through doctoral level. Secular sexologists totally control the "credentialing" (licensing) of
teachers who teach about sex in all institutions. American sexologists thus set the sexual
standards for the world-standards that violate the principles laid down in the Pontifical Council
for the Family's profound document, The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality.
Sexual abuse of children by priests is much in the news today. Yet leading secular
sexologists have asserted that adult sex with children is normal in their writings, teaching,
credentialing and counseling, in schools and seminaries of all denominations. Moreover, secular
sexology, touting the "myth of orgasm," provides the "scientzfic " authority for radical Catholics'
promotion of amoral sex, homosexuality, sex "education," abortion "rights," divorce, pornography,
etc. These "rights" are, of course, diametrically opposed to 2,000 years of Catholic teaching.
Led by the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, America's secular sexologists are
guilty of grave professional malpractice against the Catholic Church. Two of the leading
centers of this malpractice have been (a) the Sexual Disorders Clinic at Johns Hopkins
University in Maryland and (b) The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in
San Francisco (IASHS).
Your Holiness, Dr. Fred Berlin of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic is the chief
advisor to the Catholic bishops of the USA in matters of child sexual abuse. While Dr. Berlin
was telling the Church that his Clinic could "cure" pedophiles, his Clinic co-founder and
mentor, Dr. John Money, was promoting pedophilia as beneficial. Money, a well-documented
pedophilia advocate (see attached) is infamous for leading the medical team that surgically
mutilated a young boy in an attempt to turn him into a "girl," against the boy's wishes (see
attached). Meanwhile, San Francisco's IASHS sexologists mal-trained, mal-counseled and malevaluated hundreds of Catholic seminarians and priests, nationwide.
The American experience has shown that only professionals with a Judeo-Christian
philosophical belief (alongside such groups as Courage and Sexaholics Anonymous) may
successfully aid sexual addicts or offenders who have completed their incarceration.
Instead of following the authority of the Magisterium, credentialed secular sexologists
"cured sexual predators and returned them to parishes, where they molested other youngsters. On
the one hand, these sex crimes have opened the bishops to costly lawsuits. On the other hand, the
secular sexologists who advertised themselves to the bishops as human sexuality "authorities" and
"experts" are themselves liable for medical malpractice, fraud and misrepresentation to the
bishops and the Catholic faithful.
Your Holiness, I respectfully urge you to call upon all bishops to sever their ties with secular
sexology and those trained by pseudo-"sex scientistsm--fromcounseling to primary school education
to university level. I believe you will see the urgency of such an action, and its importance to the
Church's worldwide mission, when you peruse the documentation that accompanies this letter.
In closing, please note the signatures of m y esteemed colleagues who have endorsed
this international endeavor. And allow m e to thank you for courageously defending decency,
chastity, children, the family and God's Commandments. May God bless, strengthen, guide and
console you always!
Sincerely yours,
P.S. Below kindly note an article by my Catholic associate Dr. Dennis Jarrard, entitled The Porn Profs '
Plans for Your Kids,which shows how powerful and "respectable" sexology pr3fessors have become.
The "Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association" on this issue appears in Attachment 1.
PORNOGRAPHY
hndan.adon~~Tkrr#uch
to accept tbe n o w - d h d i t e d Prof. Alfred
aamurtdcs\~the~-donc~~
t&t
Thedrmqpth.tthe'urxpemmuc&
ingtoourba)r.ndgidtirnokuhumful
thntbrtdortbySwictmdNazieducltoninthe 19:&01dlWh.lnthoacwa,
pseudo-scicimze i d m tbr datha of mil-
a c ~ ~ H c c i M t h e ~ u d ,
A(=LU-P&ti.l-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RELIANCE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ON SEXUALITY ADVISORS
WHOSE MORAL FOUNDATION
DIFFERS MARKEDLY FROM THAT OF THE CHURCH
Unfortunately, Catholic institutions have long naively relied on sexuality professionals whose
advice and counsel has been based on hudulent science that had as its sole purpose the sweeping
aside of the traditional generative view of American--indeed Catholic--morality. This misplaced trust
afforded to fraudulent sex "science7' appears to be at the heart of much of the Church's recent
difficulties. Specifically, many of the church's key sexuality advisors are associated with the views
advanced by Dr. Alfied Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana via Kinsey's
seminal research, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Female (1953).
The scientific experiments that underlie the "research" published by the Kinsey Institute are
constructed from fraudulent survey methods, non-existent data, and even from criminal acts against
infants and children in order to reach what friendly biographers have documented as Kinsey's bias.
More important, any "new studies" supporting Kinsey's findings can be shown to be run by the same
tainted sexologists, some of whom currently advise Bishops on priestly sexual disorders.
Kinsey is perhaps best known for his assertion that approximately 10% to 37% of the
population is homosexual; a number which no serious researcher has since been able to replicate, and
which is now acknowledged to have been based on a disproportionately aberrant number of prison
inmates, homosexuals and sex offenders.' Additionally, the Kinsey team advocated legalizing
various other behaviors, such as fornication, adultery, bestiality, sodomy and pedophilia, then
commonly illegal and viewed as immoral and harmful.
Michael Rose's new book, Good bye! Good Men, documents some consequences of using
Kinseyan-tainted sexology in Catholic institutions, particularly in seminaries. Sexually harassed or
dismissed seminarians represent a class of potential plaintiffs for acts suffered under the auspices of
Kinseyan-tainted materials used in admissions criteria, psychological testing, teaching, textbooks and
'counseling.' Since there is almost no legal defense against such indefensible conditions or actions,
the best measure the Church can take is a pro-active, assertive tactic against those who Msely held
themselves out as human sexuality experts.
The extent of Kinsey's fraud was not known at the time and his work and theories, in the guise
of science, spawned an international field of "sexology" and sex education. However, at least since
1981, through the work of researchers such as Dr. Judith Reisman, the truth had come to light, and
many began to rethink sexual assumptions that owe their origin to Kinsey. In reviewing the early
work of Dr. Reisman and her colleagues, the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet wrote:
Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports ...
Kinsey et al ... questioned an unrepresentativeproportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a
survey of "normal" sexual behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the
sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from
pedophiles--or so it must be hoped. Kinsey....has left his former co-workers some explaining to do. 2
Consquemes,The Institute for Media Education,Crestwood, KY, 1998,2000, Chapter 5
"Eliminating Fathers,"pp 87-105.
2 The Lancet Vol. 337: March 2,1991, p. 547.
1 Judith Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes &
While there are m y others, two examples stand out to illustrate how the Church's
response to sexuality issues has M e n into the wrong hands. On the evidence, some
seminarian$have been trained in sexuality via programs called "Sexual Attitude Restructuring7'
or "~eassessment"~
created by The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality
(IASHS) in San Francisco. (Attachment 5: Sexology's 'Sexual Attitude Restructuringn)
IASHS former Academic Dean, Wardell Pomeroy, (now deceased) was a Kinsey co-author and,
according to a recent sympathetic Kinsey biographer, Kinsey's sometime sex partner.4
(Attachment 6: IASELS "Course Workn)
Dr. Pomeroy is on record as seeking h d s from the "Adult Film Association annual
cbnvention in February of 1979" to produce child pornography at the IASHS (which produced
pornography for sale to Hustler magazine, Falonna v. ~ u s t l e J(Attachment
)
7 : Sexology &
the Pornographers) Pomeroy's IASHS staff, fkulty and students also performed group,
couple and lone illegal sexual conduct for sexually explicit photos--including child
pornography-published by the IASHS as Meditations on the GiJi of Sexuality (1977).~
(Attachment 8: Sexologish as Pornographers)
According to The Boston Globe and The Advocate (a homosexual periodical), one of
Cardinal Law's Boston commission advisors on child sex abuse issues is Fred Berlin, M.D.~
(Attachment 9: Church Still Listening to 'Sexperts") In 1994 Dr. Berlin was Course
Director for a training program offered to judges, "health professionals," lawyers, legislators,
police officers and child advocacy workers teaching, among other things, that "pedophilia . . .
can be effectively controlled with appropriate psychiatric intervention." (Attachment 10:
Berlin-Money and Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders)
Dr. Berlin and John Money, Ph.D., co-founded a celebrated sexual training and treatment
center, The Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic. Dr. Berlin described Dr. Money as "one of
his most important mentor^."^ (Attachment 11: Sexperts Excuse Pedophilia and Pederasty)
Dr. Money, as it turns out, was a dedicated Kinsey disciple, the mentor for June Reinisch (the
third Kinsey Institute director) and on the advisory board of the Kinsey ~nslitute.~
Additionally,
in an interview with the pedophile periodical, The Journal of Paedophilia, John Money offered
his professi~nalcounsel that adult sex with children is normal and often beneficial.
(Attachment 12: Peterson's Sexpert Money Advocates PederastylPedophilia)
Dr. Money went on to say in the pedophile interview that the BerlidMoney Sexual
Disorders Clinic was designed to offer "leeway to judges" to free convicted child abusers.I0 For
Money, "'decided regarding paedophilia [sic] that I would never report anybody."" While m y
other eye opening details regarding Dr. Money's career could be listed, the above should suffice
to illustrate the problem facing the Church. In addition to Cardinal Law's reported reliance on
Dr. Berlin, the problem is compounded in that the founder of St. Luke's Institute, Rev. Michael
R. Peterson, M.D. (who later died of ADS), urges the church to rely on Berlin, and Money in a
1985 paper, after warning the clergy that:
3 Michael Rose, Goodbye! Good Aden, Aquirtas Publishing, Ltd., Cincinnati, Ohio, 2002, pp. 284,294.
4 James Jones, A h d C. Kinsqr; A PuMMWafe Life. W.W. Norton, New York, 199; Reisman, Mmey, Wmes & Consequences,Chapter 2.
5 CommonwealthofKentuckyvs. HqpyDay, Inc., et al., Campbell Disbict Court, 1980, pp. W304,783.
6 Id, Reisnan, pp. 82,172-175.
7 The AoVocafe, Apnl30.2002, p. 30; The Boston Gfobe, "Abuse Panel Says It Will Seek Change," MeWegion March 17,2002.
8 John Colapinto, As Nafure Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl, HatpefColl~ns,New Yak, 2000, p. 29.
9 See discussion of the Reinisch-Money connection in Reisnan, et at., Kimey, Sex & Fraud, Huntington House, Lafayette, IA, 1990.
10 Paidika: The Journal ofPaedopMlia, DrukkerijTen Brink Meppel k,Meppel, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Spnng 1991, p 12.
II Supra, The Journal ofPaedophr7ia.
[Mlalpractice cases involve situations where clerics give advice which is considered by the
civil courts to be beyond their sphere of expertise or competence. This advice allegedly
causes catastrophic consequences (divorce, suicide) resulting in civil s~its."'~
>>>>
[Money and Berh,] the two mental health professionals are considered by me and most
people in the field as the two U. S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment
of the paraphilic disorders in the past ffieen years " (circa 1970) at their ~linic.'~
Church advisers like Peterson, Money, Berlin and their institutional sponsors such as
Johns Hopkins University, The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, the Institute for the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, etc., are possibly subject to civil liability for medical
malpractice, h u d , negligence and other claims. Several articles fiom Maryland papers are
attached identifjmg Berlin's efforts to "exempt specialists fi-om reporting pedophiles even when
their crimes continue during treatment."14 Berlin's claims of success would mislead Church
officials regarding the safety of returning "eated pederasts and pedophiles to work. Indeed,
the Government Accounting Office's 1996 report on sex offenders--spanning 50 years and 500
therapeutic programs--found no form of psychotherapy that actually stopped sexual predators.'s
Still, in the admissions protocol for their program, Berlin and Money guarantee those
engaged in past, present or h r e child sexual abuse, 'We will not, however, report to your
Probation Officer information you tell us as a part of the normal doctor-patient privileged
relationship." l6 By 1988 "at least eight men [were] convicted of sexually abusing Maryland
children while under treatment" at the Johns Hopkins clinic." l7 (Attachment 13: Peterson's
Sexpert Berlin "Shielding Child Molesters"), supporting the Maryland Attorney General's
rejection of Dr. Berlin's effort to cover-up ongoing child abuse. Moreover, Dr. Paul McHugh, as
former Johns Hopkins director of psychiatry and a member of the Baltimore Archdiocese's
Independent Review Board on Child Sexual Matters was fully supportive of Berlin's efforts to
protect even active pedophiles in treatment at Johns ~ o ~ k i n s . ' ~
As you may know, St Luke's is one of the primary Catholic treatment centers for priests
battling personal sexuality issues.lg It is disturbing, to say the least, that the founder of the
institution has such high praise and regard for men such as Drs. Money and Berlin. In short, our
Lord long ago warned of wolves in sheep's clothing and, as detailed above, Kinseyan wolves
have provided guidance to the Church in therapeutically managing homosexual priests. Since
the 50s, the criminal justice system has adopted the same Kinseyan view of sex offenders and
therapeutic management as has the Church, with the same disappointing and destructive results.
12 "The Problem of Sexual Molestation by Roman Catholic Clergy: Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensiveand Responsible
Manner." This statement appears in "General Discussion" p. 9 of the co-written report.
13 Thomas P. Doyle, F. Ray Mouton, Michael R. Peterson, "The Problem of Sexual Molestationby Roman Catholic Clergy:
Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensiveand Responsible Manner," 1985, (unpaginated) p. 2.
l4
The Capital G i v d e , "Our say: Stop shielding child molesters," Editorial, March 23, 1988, A-18 (date and page somewhat blurred).
15 See, "Sex Offender Treahent: Research Results Inconciusive About What Works to Reduce Recidivism," Government
Accounting Office, GGD-96-137, June 21,1996.
16 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Clinic, BiosexualPsychohormonalClinic, patient agreement
pages, unpaginated, page 26 of the DoyleMouton-Petersondocument.
lbid, The Capital Gazette.
18 The Sun, "Doctor skirts repwhng law on sex crimes" see page titled, "attempt to circumvent law on reportingsex crimes,"
March 4,1990.
19 "Founded in 1981 by a priest-psychiatistwho later died of AIDS, St. Luke is one of a handful o f such clinics. The Washingon
Post, Caryle Murphy, "Treating the Priest," May 11,2002, Metro, A1.
T H E P R O B L E H OF
SEXUAL HOLESTATXON
MEETING T H E P R O B L E M I N
AND R E S P O N S I B L E
BY
COMPREHENSIVE
MANNER
/&--7z29
+
&
&
H i c h a e l R . P e t e r s o n , H.D.'
President
Saint Luke I n s t i t u t e , Inc.
(Rev
T h i s c o n f i d e n t i a l d o c u m e n t h a d i t s rerno1.e
beginnings
i n J a n u a r y of 1 9 8 5 a s a r e s u 1 . t
o f t h e c o n s e q u e n c e s o f t h e u n f o r t u n a t e :.ncidents
in Louisiana.
p a r t s of t h e f i n a l
d r a f t were prepared
i n Hay of 1 9 0 5 a n d t h i s f i n a l d r a f t
compiled
Mouton,
J.C.D
On
J.D.
June 8-9,
and Rev.
1985
vss
b y Xr. F. R s y
T h o m a s P, D o y l e ,
S.P.
When children are constantly warned by parents and teachers against contacts
with adults.. .they are ready to become hysterical as soon as any older person
approaches, or stops and speaks to them in the street, or fondles them, or
proposes to do something for them, even though the adult may have had no
sexual objective in mind. Some of the more experienced students ofjuvenile
problems have come to believe that the emotional reactions of the parents, police
officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact,
may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves. The
current hysteria over sex offenders may very well have serious effects on the
ability of many of these children to work out sexual adjustments some years later
in their marriages. (Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences at 136)
A SHORT SUMMARY OF SOME PROBLEMS WITH PETERSONMOUTON-DOYLE AS TO WHY THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE
FOLLOWED INSURIOUS SEXUALMEDICAL ADVICE
In their 1985 tome to the Church hierarchy. Mouton- Doyle-Peterson warn that the church
could be guilty of "clergy malpractice" if orthodox clerics counsel sexual wrongd,~ers.
Sexual advice
from clergy (say
the three
A G E N E R A L DISCUSS ION:
authorities in law,
orthodoxy and
sexuality)
d e v e l o p i n g a r e a s of j u r i s p r u d e n c e v h i c h
allegedly "causes
e x a m p l e i s t h e ncvly d e v e l o p i n g area
catastrophic
consequences
of C l e r q y m a l p r a c t i c e .
S u i t s a r e b e i n g filtd a g a i n s t P r o t e s t a n t
(divorce, suicide)
H i n i s t e r s and C a t h o l i c C l e r g y . T h e s e m a l p r a c t i c e c a s e s i n v o l v e
resulting in civil
suits." (p. 9)
s i t u a t i o n s v h e r e c l e r i c s a i v e a d v i c e v h i c h is c o n s i d e r e d by the
Why?
c i v i l c o u r t s t o be b e y o n d t h e i r .s.p h e r e o f e---x ~ e r t l s eo r c o m ~ t e n c e
o The Johns Hopkins Hospital Sexual Disorders Clinic run by Dr. Jot-n Money and Dr.
Fred Berlin is probably the "authority" [sic] scientific community. I know personally
both of these highly respected scientists and I am very appreciative of their efforts to
bring this psychiatric disorder out of the shadows and into the "scie ltific daylight" so
that we can begin to see the disorder as a psychiatric disease and not a moral
weakness.. .I am professionally working with Dr. Fred Berlin, both in his research
endeavors with this disease and clinically with respect to legal testimony in different
jurisdictions to help educate the court jurisdictions about the "hope' for treatment and
rehabilitation of persons with this disease'' (page 4).
Peterson states as a "careful "thinker" and an expert, that he is well aware "of the scientific
research" and concludes that "the etiology of this disorder [child molesting: is likely
biological" and while environment might contribute, the "disease" likely occurs "in utero."
He adds that he "
m
o copied for you the literature packet that is given to potential patients in the Sexual
Disorders Clinic which is Co-Directed by Dr. John Money and Dr. Fred Berlin;
these two mental health professionals are considered by me and most people in the
field as the two U.S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment of the
paraphiliac disorders in the past fifteen years." (page ).
0
Mouton- Doyle-Peterson single out the Johns Hopkins' Sexual Disorders Clinic co-founders Money
and Berlin (both of whom refuse to report the ongoing crimes of child molesters in their care) as "the
two U.S. experts," in the "field" of sexuality. Mouton- Doyle-Peterson falsely claim proofs of the
Hopkins sexperts "success in treatment" in "fifteen years," including in their joint document,
application forms for those who wish to enter the Money-Berlin center for sex counseling.
On the one hand, MoneyIBerlin threaten the offender with a report to his "Probation Officer" if he is
c'non-compliant" and does not attend his costly counseling session. On the other hand, MoneyIBerlin
promise not to report those who are engaged in ongoing sexual crimes against adults or children.
"We will not, however report to your Probation Officer information [read, sexually criminal acts] you
tell us as part of the normal doctor-patient privileged relationship." (The full document is available in
this author's archive).
notify your Probation Officer that you have been non-compliant. ,'it ?ill ~ t however,
,
rewrt to Probt ion-fO
y
m noml doctor
~~ti~&.l.uivilrrrdi~n~hi~.
If we felt that in the absence of thir rvir UL
A recent study conducted by a task force for The Catholic Medical Association found that those
in "treatment" in one such unnamed facility reported ongoing efforts by their therapists to tell the
offenders that anti-Catholic sexual conduct, including homosexual sodomy, was both normal and
correct (see attached study in these materials). Moreover, based on this researchers experience,
the bishops would have been told by the sexperts that children commonly forget sexual
violations and that to reveal child sexual abuse to the authorities would harm the child more than
would the original crime. This has been the sexology position since Kinsey stated it in Sexual
Behavior in the Human Male (1948).
Bishops would never have been informed that Dr. Money, the leading expert counseling
these offenders and the expert who trained Dr. Berlin and other disciples, was on record as
saying pedophilia, even incest, was normal and that Dr. Berlin was on record as saying they
could "cure" such men, as above, refusing to reveal the crimes being committed while
undergoing Hopkins drug and psychological medical therapies;
Some bishops would have been told that pedophilia was normal and that the distress of the
children was a function of the disorder of their parents, also a common sexology position.
This is also very possible and would again constitute malpractice;
Some bishops would have been told that "science" proved children forget sexual abuse
quickly but are damaged when police, parents, counselors and clergy make a fuss. They
would have been warned that the child was especially damaged should the offender be
prosecuted;
Some bishops would have been told that prosecution was the worst action to take - not only
would it ruin the life of a perfectly fine man of God but it would irreparably damage the
child's psyche!
Some bishops also would have been told that children are commonly complicit, seductive in
these cases, though he or she was sometimes unaware of their complicity.
There is no reason bishops or priests should have doubted the expertise of these men and the
"human sexuality" field anymore than have senators, congressmen, judges, juries who have
made bad rulings based on their testimony or the universities that hired them to train our
national leaders;
There would be NO Way bishops or priests would suspect the "experts" on pedophilia were
themselves promotingpedophilia and writing that the problem with adult sex with children was with
the "anti-sexual" nature of religion. In "Attacking the Last Taboo: Researchers are lobbying against
the ban on incest," Time wrote of John Money's view on incest saying "One who commits incest is
like a "'religious deviant in a one-religion society"' - thus neatly planting the notion that opposition
to incest is quite like religious intolerance." (Time, 4/14/80, p. 72)
Fred Berlin, still an advisor to Cardinal Law on child sexual abuse matters, has never renounced
Money's views;
Also, Michael Rose's claim that perhaps hundreds of seminarians were deeply coarsened and
compromised by viewing the Sexual Attitude Restructuring programs, the " S A R appears to be
verified by this researcher's own experience in this field, pending discovery of the facts.
.The " S A R are pornography
T I know the institute of .+avanced Seaoiog) r c l i o
shows called the "fu--arama
avilv on destnsitising procedures including what you
by Wardell Pomeroy, the
I a 'fuckararna'. Is that really necessary? I'\T seen one
Academic Dean of the
and i t seemed quire unncccssap to m e .
Institute for the Advanced
p We think i t is ~hcrapeutic.Let me explain. -4spart of
Study of Human Sexuality
our inrcnsivt courtcs w t project several films on ro a
(IASHS) which created the
series of screens simultaneously. T h e y vary in context
SAR. The SAR included
Porn 'hard porn' homosexualiry to milder loving themes.
bestiality and child
After the session the audience breaks up into small groups
pornography in their nonfor discussion. The results are very inreresting and useful.
church settings until some
C
time in the late 1980s. Right
Thir seems bizarre and possibly oliensive ro most
is an excerpt from the British
Lrirish tastes. Don't people get upset. hurt o r even rather
Journal of Sexual Medicine
disgusted?
(1182) in which the Pomeroy
This is the idea of the rnultiplc screens. \\'e tell our
explains its definition.
s:udcnts ro watch what [he\- find most interesting. not
&'
.r
ACADEMIC
Private
Fundom
RootrWkr
Ki.ury. Ponwroy
-hard,
M n .
Gm n m Y.k
&n&n
-,
slmon. &hll).r.
C w n . Cmnm.
1938
on l k w r s h
purapy)
Public
Funders
u.1-bYzh
-.
Dr. A I M C. Kinaey
Sckntltlc
Authortty tor
"The Klnmoy M o d e l "
s u m , FUSO~~I
T~X-
Original Sexuality
Researchers
Educrtors
INDIANA
UNIVERSITY
NU. R # u r r h
4-.
RESEARCHERS
c.ld"wood
,u,,-r
LICIIvonlu. Mb.N..
Kolodny, We.
(-,
Hunof
K l n u y Yod.l
rn.Clp(rr)
TEACHING,
~
NYU
EdMealth
1964
IASHS'
SFlCal
lsse
U Penn
EdMwlth
I=
1971
Sexual Annudo Rostructurtng (SAR)
(G-
-rd.
5.x S
s.n u w r r srx
Uu
r In nmrApy.
~
,-.F
P
-"--
courr
rnPlraum-bm
omrrs Smx0)ogy
I1
--
ASSECT m
puMic t
b the
m Klnaey IA&
am momberm wrvs the gonerml
ugh wbrach . g . n c k m li*.Planned Parenthood.
onirrlng rchoo-m,
courtroomm, etc.
I
I
--son-
Mal~ractice,Consumer Fraud,
Human Ex~erimentationWithout
Informed Consent, Discrimination
WHO WERE THE CHURCH SEXPERTS & HOW
WERE THEY TRAINED?
ODrs. Fred Berlin & John Money; Johns Hopkins
University Medical School;
~ P o m e r y Mcllvenna,
,
Sutton; Institute for the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality,
Gebhard, Reinisch, Bancroft; Kinsey lnstitute
& A l l Other Accredited "Sexuality" Agents.
l
Spring 1991, Money is Professor Emeritus at JH, on the Kinsey Board, the Penthouse Board, over 400 peer
approved scientitic papepers, etc.
B. LOCATION O F FACILITIES: Priests are regularly sent to facilities away from the
support of friends and family.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Outpatient treatment in their own environment is the preferred
treatment for support and recovery for most patients.
RECOMMENDATION: Except for unusual circumstances, a priest should not be sent to
some facility far away from friends and family. Also, they should not be held
C. PATIENT RIGHTS: There are reports that priests have not been treated in accord
with their basic civil rights or accorded the rights due to any patient in a health care
facility.
STANDARD PRACTICE: The patient must be given the option of informed consent
which includes alternatives to the treatment offered at the facility. This would include
treatment at a specialized inpatient hospital with a length of stay consistent with the
standards of care in the mental health field. The patient must have the right of choice in
regard to a psychiatrist or psychologist for treatment and the right to change psychiatrists
or psychologists during treatment. The patient must be given the opportunity for a second
opinion which must be acknowledged and given reasonable consideration by the facility.
The patient must have the right to be transferred to another facility of his choice if he so
desires.
RECOMMENDATION: The priest is entitled to patient rights and the mandated civil
rights of a United States citizen. Without a civil commitment, no priest may be held
against his will. In addition a priest should not to be held in the hospital under coercion
including threats of loss of faculties.
D. LENGTH OF STAY: The evaluated facilities routinely keep priest patients for 4 to 6
months regardless of the diagnosis or severity of their problem.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Current practice calls for short term inpatient treatment
whenever possible An extended LOS of 4-6 months regardless of diagnosis or severity of
illness is not acceptable and deviates from the standards for care in the mental health
field.
RECOMMENDATION: The Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) should be kept to a
minimum in accord with current standards of care in the United States. These are
medical decisions to be made between the treating mental health professionals and the
patient. It is acknowledged that the patient's Bishop or superior will have the ultimate
decision about the return to duty. However, the patient is not to be held in the hospital
because a superior or Bishop is not ready to take him back. Superiors, personnel directors
and bishops should not be involved with decisions regarding LOS and discharge date.
E. PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY: There are reports that mental health professionals
at the evaluated facilities report confidential communications to the priests superiors or
bishops.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Optimal treatment of a patient requires a confidential
relationship between the physician and the patient.
RECOMMENDATION: A priest who is a patient must be treated with the same dignity
and respect as a lay patient. The priest must not be required, pressured or coerced to
waive rights of privileged communication.
11. TREATMENT OF SEXUAL DISORDERS
Diagnostic categories would include sexual acting-out behaviors with adults of the
opposite or same sex and the more serious disorders of sexual behaviors with adolescents
(ephebophilia) and with children (pedophilia).
A. LENGTH O F STAY: In the Church sponsored treatment centers each of these
categories are treated for approximately the same length of time; that is, at six months or
more of inpatient treatment
STANDARD PRACTICE: According to current mental health standards adults are not
usually treated in an inpatient setting for a consenting sexual relationship with another
adult unless the behavior is viewed as being sexually addictive. For example, the length
of stay (LOS) at the Meadows in Arizona, one of the few inpatient treatment centers for
those with sexually addictive behaviors in the United States, is four weeks. A stay of six
months not only deviates from accepted standards in the mental health field, but it is not
clinically indicated, and may, in fact, be harmful to patients.
RECOMMENDATION: The length of stay for priests should be consistent with standard
practice.
be used to change attractions and behaviors. The position taken by the major mental
health organizations on therapy is based on: either a neutrality on the morality of
homosexual acts; or a belief that homosexual acts are morally equal to heterosexual acts.
Such beliefs are not compatible with Catholic health care.
RECOMMENDATION: Those mental health professionals responsible for the care of
priests and religious suffering from sexual disorders need to be educated on the causes
and treatment of homosexuality and other sexual disorders. There is ample evidence that
homosexuality can be successfully treated in any patient who sincerely desires change.
Furthermore, while not all patients will be able to function heterosexually and to marry
successfully, this obviously is not a concern for priests. The general prediction of therapy
success is that 30% will achieve a resolution of homosexual attractions and heterosexual
function and an additional 30% will achieve freedom from unwanted homosexual
behavior. (A full bibliography of research documenting the positive results of therapy is
appended.)
D. INFORMED CONSENT: Priests experiencing homosexual attractions are not
informed that their condition can be treated and that there is every reason for them to
expect to be able to achieve full freedom from sexual acting-out. In fact they often receive
the false information that homosexuality is untreatable and homosexual attractions must
be accepted and integrated into the personality.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Clients have a right to know of all types of therapy available
for the condition from which they suffer and the research on outcomes of treatment.
RECOMMENDATION: A pamphlet outlining the outcomes of research and the various
types of treatment for sexual disorders should be prepared and given to all patients
suffering from these problems in all Catholic mental health facilities. CMA is willing to
provide such information.
E. FAILURE T O PROVIDE CONTACT WITH SUPPORT GROUPS: Patients are
rarely referred to Courage, the only recovery program in the Church supported by the
Pontifical Council for the Family.
STANDARD PRACTICE: It is standard practice for treatment centers to avail themselves
of appropriate support groups, and to encourage participation in such groups.
RECOMMENDATION: Patients should be given the opportunity to attend Courage
meetings.
B. DISCHARGE POLICY: After release from the hospital, priests report being
subjected to the indignity of 'reintegration' into his parish or work location, during which
a representative of the hospital escorts the priest back to his work area and sets up
committees to oversee the his adjustment. Furthermore, hospital staff often attempt to
control the choice of outpatient mental health professionals.
STANDARD PRACTICE: When patients are discharged from the hospital, they return
home unaccompanied by hospital employees. Confidential material is not divulged to
others. The patient's adjustment is followed by the treating mental health professional.
Hospitals entrust the follow up treatment to qualified mental health professionals who are
chosen by the patient, not by the hospital.
RECOMMENDATION: After discharge the priest must be allowed to choose a mental
health professional of his own choice. The mental health professional should be
knowledgeable of and in agreement with the Church's moral teaching. The priest's
confidentiality must be respected and committee oversight should be abolished.
C. FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT: At some treatment centers patients are required to
return every six months for five years for a 5 day stay and to meet with a team of
individuals for evaluation. Former patients regularly complain that they never see their
former therapists and that these meetings accomplish nothing and are a waste of time and
money. At other centers patients are asked to return for outpatient visits even though they
are under the care of their own outpatient therapists.
STANDARD PRACTICE: This type of follow-up deviates markedly from the standards
of care of the mental health field. Patients do not return to psychiatric hospitals for follow
up care. Also, the requirement of discharged patients to meet with a team of individuals
on a regular basis is not supported by anyone in the mental health field. Follow-up to
inpatient treatment is normally conducted between the psychiatrist or psychologist and the
patient. There is no need for the patient to share personal and confidential history with a
team of individuals.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Priests should not be required to return to treatment centers
after their discharge. Follow-up programs at inpatient treatment centers should be
discontinued. Appropriate follow-up to inpatient treatment should involve regular reports,
perhaps 3 or 4 times yearly, to the Bishop or religious superior from the mental health
professional who is treating the priest or religious.
D. OUTPATIENT EVALUATIONS
Some of the centers insist that evaluations of outpatients occur in the context of a one or
two week inpatient stay. Also, priests and religious are regularly denied the right to
choose their evaluators. If they have done so, the reports of these mental health
professionals often are not accepted by the superior or bishop who usually insist upon an
evaluation performed by mental health professionals employed by inpatient treatment
centers.
STANDARD PRACTICE: A comprehensive psychological and psychiatric evaluation
should take no more than two or three days and can be accomplished on an outpatient
basis. One or two week inpatient stays can be psychologically detrimental to the client.
Inpatient stays are reserved for those with serious disorders and not for psychological
evaluations. These one and two weeks stays are to the detriment of the priest and to the
financial benefit of the hospital.. Also, all patients have the legal right to choose the
mental health professionals who will evaluate them.
RECOMMENDATION: Priests should not be sent for one or two week hospital stays for
evaluations which are routinely done on an outpatient basis. Also, strict criteria should be
in place to determine whether an individual should be sent for evaluation. If the
evaluation done by the therapist chosen by the priest is deemed to be unsatisfactory, then
the religious superior, personnel director or Bishop has the right to ask for a second
opinion.
E. CONFLICT O F INTEREST BETWEEN OUTPATIENT EVALUATION
PROGRAMS AND INPATIENT TREATMENT CENTERS: Currently mental health
professionals who are employees of the inpatient facility conduct outpatient evaluations
on priests.. The result of these evaluations is usually a recommendation for inpatient
treatment at the facility at which the mental health professional is employed.
STANDARD PRACTICE: This practice clearly represents a conflict of interest. A
number of reports have raised concerns that treatment facilities determine the length of
stay of clients on the ability to pay, increasing the institution's income by lengthening the
stay..
RECOMMENDATION: Outpatient evaluations should be conducted by mental health
professionals who are not associated with treatment centers to which priests might be
referred.
would be preferable to the current system of referring to treatment centers for evaluations.
The Catholic Medical Association could serve as a referral source to provide the names of
psychiatrists and psychologists in different parts of the country.
priesthood should as far as possible share the cultural background of the devout,
faithful, mature candidates they are to evaluate. The professionals should be Catholics in
good standing, who support the Church's teaching on sexuality, life, contraception,
homosexuality, celibacy of the priesthood, the ordination of only men, and the
hierarchical structure of the Church. The CMA will be happy to assist Bishops and
religious superiors in this activity by preparing a list of qualified mental health
professionals who meet this criteria.
Non-Catholics and Catholics who do not support the teachings of the
Church should not be employed in this task.
Attachment 2:
The Kinsey-Catholic
Connection
BE THE
'RESEARCHER
ALFRED C, KINSEX
Dr. Judith Reisman. . .
ploding clrrrcal sex abuse scandals, some medlzal and legal experts, in~lud:ngDT Judith Rcis
man. ituthnr of K~rr.vey.C ~ ~ m &
es
T ~ r t ; s + y u r ~ have
r ~ - ~ advised
,~.
thc
bishops to take lcgcll action against
thei~c x p n s who oftered ?hemthc
disa.strous a d v i c e that brought
thcri~tu thc prescnt crisis.
8 t r r Dr. Reisrnlul. the r~ation's
iradln: iiuthaiaity on rhe sexual
psychopaths who created and w s lain the so -cdIcd "human sexualil y cduc;tt~on"i n d u s ~ r y ,fears the
bistlnps will miss ir gulden, "Godg~vcrl"opportunity to establish in
a court of law that the bishops and the American peoplt- - were
lied to by the top experts In the sex
education/counscling/therapy rndustry.
"Through this scandal." Dr.Reisman said in an extensive telcphone interview with The Wandrrer. "God has Bvcn rhc blshops a
great opportu~ty 1don't know if
they desctve ~t -to show in a court
of Inw that they and the nation havc
been lied to for at least four ox five
decades a b u t human sexuality; that
they and the nation were misled.
malpracliced, Tbe 'human sexuality' field is not a field, the cxperts we
not experts, the emperor [Kjnsey]
had no clothes and hc was a bugger
to boot.
The Wanderer:
National
Catholic
Weekly
June2 0 , 2 0 0 2 , (coat. p 1 )
ible plague. B u t I
f e a r t h e y d o n ' t have
the commitment to
d o that, a n d t h i s
enormous
opportunity, j u s t
like t h e children w h o
h a v e been abused,
will b e discarded."
T h e paper w r i t t e n
b y Reisman a n d
others, s u b m i t t e d t o
a select g r o u p of
bishops, is titled,
"Reliance o f t h e
Catholic Church o n
Sexuality Advisors
Whose Moral
Foundation Differs
Markedly f r o m t h a t
o f t h e Church."
It informs t h e
bishops t h a t
"Catholic institutions
have long naively
relied o n sexuality
professionals whose
advice and counsel
has been based o n
fraudulent science
t h a t had as i t s sole
purpose t h e
sweeping aside o f
t h e traditional
generative view o f
American -- indeed
Catholic -- morality.
NO LEGAL DEFENSE
"This misplaced
t r u s t afforded t o
fraudulent sex
'science' appears to be
at the heart of much
of the Church's recent
difficulties.
Specifically, many of
the Church's key
sexuality advisors are
associated with the
views advanced by Dr.
Alfred Kinsey and the
Kinsey Institute at the
University of Indiana
via Kinsey's seminal
research; Sexual
Behavior in the Human
Male (1948) and
Sexual Behavior in the
Human Female
(1953)."
Kinseys assertion that
ten-to-40 percent of
the male population is
homosexual at one
stage in life was based
on his study of
incarcerated,
predominantly
homosexual, sex
offenders, and that
Kinsey and his
colleagues were the
driving force behind
the legalization of
fornication, adultery,
bestiality, pedophilia
and other immoral,
harmful behaviors.
The paper also advises
the bishops that a
potential pool of
plaintiffs for a classaction suit against the
sex
education/counseling/t
herapy industry whose major
institutions are Johns
Hopkins University in
Baltimore, Indiana
University, home of
the Kinsey Institute,
and the Institute for
the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality in
San Francisco - can be
found in the sexually
harassed or dismissed
seminarians who
"suffered under the
auspices of Kinseyantainted materials used
in admissions criteria,
psychological testing,
teaching, textbooks
and 'counseling.'
"Since there is almost
no legal defense
against such
indefensible conditions
or actions, the best
measure the Church
can take is a proactive, assertive tactic
against those who
falsely held
themselves out as
human sexuality
experts," the report
states.
For more than two
decades, the report
continues, since
Reisman's
groundbreaking work,
Kinsey, Sex & Fraud:
The Indoctrination of a
People, honest,
legitimate
professionals have
known that Kinsey and
his peers, financed
through the
foundations (especially
the Rockefeller
Foundation), organized
vice and the
pornography racket,
were engaged in a
grand and diabolical
scheme to replace
traditional, JudeoChristian sexual
morality with sexual
libertinism.
The report also
provides two examples
that "illustrate how the
Church's response to
sexuality issues has
fallen into the wrong
hands.
"First ....some
seminarians have been
trained i n sexuality via
a program sometimes
called Sexual Attitude
Reassessment created
by The Institute for
the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality
(IASHS). IASHS'
former Academic
Dean, Wardell
Pomeroy, (now
deceased) was a
Kinsey co-author and,
according t o a recent
sympathetic Kinsey
biographer, Kinsey's
sometime sex partner.
(James Jones, Alfred
C. Kinsey; A
Public/Private Life,
W1.W. Norton, New
York, 1997)
"Dr. Pomeroy is on
record as seeking
funds from the Adult
Film Association
annual convention in
February of 1979 to
produce child
pornography a t the
IASHS (which
produced pornography
for sale). Pomeroy's
IASHS staff and
faculty also performed
group, couple and
single person illegal
sexual conduct-including child
pornography -- for the
IASHS photographic
book, Meditations on
the Gift of Sexuality
(1977)."
TRAINING THE
TRAINERS
SAR workshops,
seminars and
programs are typically
two, three or even
five-day events where
groups of students,
employees, managers,
corporate executives
training program
offered to judges,
'health professionals,'
lawyers, legislators,
police officers and
child advocacy
workers teaching,
among other things,
that 'pedophilia ....can
be effectively
controlled with
appropriate psychiatric
intervention.'
"Dr. Berlin and John
Money, Ph.D., cofounded a celebrated
sexual training and
treatment center, The
Johns Hopkins Sexual
Disorders Clinic. Dr.
Berlin described Dr.
Money as 'one of his
most important
mentors.' Dr. Money,
as it turns out, was a
dedicated Kinsey
disciple, the mentor
for June Reinisch (the
third Kinsey Institute
director) and on the
advisory board of the
Kinsey Institute.
Additionally, in an
interview with the
pedophile periodical,
The Journal of
Paedeophilia, John
Money offered his
professional counsel
that adult sex with
children is normal and
often beneficial.
"Dr. Money went on to
say in the pedophile
interview that the
BerlinIMoney Sexual
Disorders Clinic was
designed to offer
'leeway to judges' to
free child abusers. For
Money, 'decided
regarding paedohilia
[sic] that Iwould
never report
anybody' ....I n addition
to Cardinal Law's
reported reliance on
claims.
"Several articles from
Maryland papers are
attached identifying
Berlin's efforts to
'exempt specialists
from reporting
pedophiles even when
their crimes continue
during treatment.'
"Berlin's claims of
success would mislead
Church officials
regarding the safety of
returning 'treated'
pederasts and
pedophiles to work.
Indeed, the
Government
Accounting Office's
1996 report on sex
offenders -- spanning
50 years and 500
therapeutic programs - found no form of
psychotherapy that
actually stopped
sexual predators."
"Still, in the
admissions protocol
for their program,
Berlin and Money
guarantee those
engaged in past,
present or future child
sexual abuse, 'We will
not, however, report
to your Probation
Officer information you
tell us as a part of the
normal doctor-patient
privileged
relationship.'
"By 1988 'at least
eight men [were]
convicted of sexually
abusing Maryland
children while under
treatment' at the
Johns Hopkins clinic,'
supporting the
Maryland Attorney
General's rejection of
Dr. Berlin's effort to
KEELER'S EXPERT
"Moreover, Dr. Paul
McHugh, as former
Johns Hopkins director
of psychiatry and a
member of the
Baltimore
Archdiocese's
Independent Review
Board on Child Sexual
Matters was fully
supportive of Berlin's
efforts to protect even
active pedophiles in
treatment at Johns
Hopkins...."
According t o Dr.
Reisman, the troubles
the Church is currently
buried in date back to
the 1930s and '40s,
when Kinsey and his
cohorts and their
financial backers
promoted themselves
as the possessors of a
new, scientific
understanding of
human sexuality, and
positioned themselves
as the educators of
countless teachers,
social workers and
clerics, including
Catholic bishops and
priests.
"We know," she
explained in her
Wanderer interview,
"that the whole basis
of the human sexuality
education programs
delivered to clergy of
every denomination not just Catholics was based on the most
massive cover-up of
child sexual abuse in
the history of
American science, and
the cover-up is
continuing.
Page 1 of 12
WEDNESDAY
JUNE 12
2002
rn College settles
suit on free
speech
White House
reporter on radio
show
Terrorist expert
blasts Condi Rice
Stewardess' kin
plan to sue
American
COMMENTARY:
Smoking trousers
By Ann Coulter
Why Iam not a
liberal
By Joseph Farah
Page 2 of 12
Sponsor
a Child
Today!
WhyIama
libertarian
By Harry Browne
I t ' s like
fighting cancer
with a topical
medication.
They are not
addressing the
problem but
they can 't
because many
of these
bishops are
compromised
and waiting to
be exposed
[for abuse]
themselves.
--Stephen Brady,
president of Roman
Catholic Faithful,
commenting on the
Church's attempts to
deal with sex-abuse
scandal
Page 3 of 12
training.
Activist Thomas Phillips says in the preface to
a dossier he collected on the archdiocese: "It is
within this climate of lax sexual mores set by
Rembert Weakland that proclivities toward
sexual abuse have grown and festered, until
giving rise to an explosion of pedophilia cases,
criminal convictions and lawsuits."
That was written nearly 10 years ago when
seven priests had been accused of abuse. Since
then, more cases have arisen, leading up to the
present media focus on a crisis that afflicts not
only Milwaukee, but the entire U.S. Church.
Brady states what is obvious to fellow
Catholics who have connected the dots
between the kind of environment created by
Weakland and the current sex scandal.
"When you break down sexual barriers and
open people to not being sensitive or ashamed,
then you start to make them vulnerable to sin,"
he told WorldNetDaily.
Widespread problem
How many dioceses have inculcated the kind
of amoral atmosphere seen in Milwaukee?
About 90 percent, according to Paul Likoudis,
the author of an upcoming book that examines
the origins of the current scandal and a news
editor of the Catholic newspaper 'The
Wanderer.
In "AmchurchComes Out: The U.S. Bishops,
Pedophile Scandals and the Homosexual
Agenda," Likoudis asserts that homosexuals
and pedophiles controlled the post-Vatican I1
liturgical reform in the United States and
Canada.
Along with Weakland, he names Archbishop
Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, Bishop
I think some
of the bishops
in this country
are so
committed to
social
acceptance of
homosexuality
that they don't
care about
anything else.
That's their
No. 1 thing in
life, because
that is what
they are
spending most
of their
resources on.
--Paul Likoudis,
author and news
editor of The
Wanderer
Reshaping attitudes
At the Milwaukee Archdiocese's Cousins
Center, participants in the course "Reassessing
our Sexual Attitudes," held in the 1980s,
watched a National Sex Forum film of
"leisurely and active lovemaking" in which a
couple moves "freely from one activity to the
next, engaging in several positions, some with
a vibrator."
The National Sex Forum (earlier known as the
National Sex and Drug Forum) is the group
that launched the San Francisco Institute on the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in the
1970s. Other NSF film titles include "Jimand
Vern," which shows a "wide range of
homosexual activity," and "Reflections - Sexual
Patterns with Multiple Partners," a "discussion
starter showing what group sex is like and
how some people feel about it."
Page 4 of 12
Page 5 of 12
Page 6 of 12
Page 7 of 12
Page 8 of 12
Page 10 of 12
Related stories:
'Gay' culture in Church grows
Page 11 of 12
Art
--E-mail t o a Friend
,-
E l
'
-I'
Printer-friendly version
Contact WND
Page 12 of 12
FRIDAY
MARCH 5
1999
ShopNetDaily
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
LocalNetDaily
Commentary
Classified Ads
Letters
People Search
TalkNetDaily
SportsNetDaily
Health
Weather
NGuide
Movies
Business
Stocks
Introducing
WND Books and
author Michael
Savage
New Mideast war
front: American
newspapers
News editor
talks media bias
Nickelodeon
'promoting'
homosexuality?
Slepian softens
before his death
Pakistan
bombing blunder
by militants?
Intelligence
source says
!'
Saddam has
nuke
COMMENTARY:
W h o will help the
children?
tK
By Bill O'Reilly
Dereliction of
duty
By Thomas
lipping
Djl Sexism in
Hollywood?
By Larry Elder
iP
zyy
z tX
tg;',
qzzq
May 4,2002
-Bethlehem Church
Standoff Agreement
Reached
Pront Pase
Nation/Pollticr
World
Commentary
Oplnlon/Editoriai
Matropolitrn
sports
Bu~iness
Technology
Entertainment
Culture
Weather
Family Tlmes
Auto Weekend
Wash. Weekend
Books
Home Guide
Arts
Nat'l Weekly Edlffon
Gift Guide
Touti6t Ouida
Int'l Speclot Reports
Employment Extm
Pedophile science
Even as the nation's largest religious denomination is
rocked by the scandal of pedophile priests, Judith Levine, in
herbook"HarmfirltoMinors,"ismakingex~:uses~r
pedaphilia.This is hardly a coincidence. Academic Judith
R e i i author of "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequehces," says
pro-pedophile "sexperts" such as those lionized in Miss
Levine's book have counseled the Roman Catholic Church
and other denominations for at least two decades about the
harmlessness of pedophilia.
As the m t media darling of the "anything goes"sexual
revolution (how many authors get a pro-pedophile-Edvorable
photo story in the New York Times?), Miss Levine gets ink
and ample space to disparage anyone who difEm with her
-such as Mrs. Reisnan, whn finds childrenworthy of
protection rather than sexual exploitaton
Miss Levine's letter to the editor in The Washington Times
is as misguidedand inaccutilte as her collection of statistics
on sex, incest, cbilhamosermality, sex~ffender
recidivism, pedophile abuse,etc. drawn from notorious
pedophile advocates ( ' " C h i l h are sexual,' says author,"
N o r e Srnail Mallbox
Bombs Called 'Pranks'
*DNA Heips in Probe of
Anthrax Source
abstinence program
April 25).
STEVEBAU)WIN
Executive dimtor
Council for National Policy
Fairfax, Va.
tweaked canola
In the April 29 Op-Ed piece ' ' k t them eat canola," Eric
Peters attempts to make the case that genetidy en,gineered
canola seeds that are made more resistant to specific
herbiciciqlresuttin "less spmying by faren d less
FRIDAY
MARCH 26
1999
LocalNetDaily
Commentary
CllassPfied Ads
Letters
People Search
TalkNetDaily
SportsNetDaily
Health
Weather
N Guide
Movies
Business
Stocks
NEWS:
Introducing
&
child sex.
News editor
Slspian softens
before his death
!i
children?
By Bill O'Rellly
Dereiictlon of
duty
Jipping
6 y Thomas
w i s m in
OK.
...
Hollywood?
By arry Elder
J"
a printer-friendly version
Contact WND
37
In that context she raises further sinister questions about Kinsey's data. For instance, who
was the "lone pedophile," the "elderly gentleman" cited by Kinsey for his sexual
molestation of 800 children?Who were 'The
Children of Table 34" and what became of
them? How did Kinsey's "technically trained"
observers gain access to the claimed 1,800
American children for illegal genital experiments? "To this day," she observes, "the Kinsey Institute and Indiana University have
repeatedly...refused to reveal any names of
the subjects or the experimenters." Nor has
any one of these children ever come forward,
although the institute seems an excellent target for lawsuits.
Evenin the destitute 1930s,at the citedrate
of a dollar a day, she doubts that children as
young as three months were obtainable in such
numbers around Bloomington, Indiana. She
suggests an ominous but credible alternative: a collaborative link between Kinsey and
Nazi Germany, then a police state where such
"experimentation" could easily be conducted "as part of an ongoing collegial,cross-culturd, multinational, 'fact-finding' research
project." She cites significant links, such as
one George Sylvester Viereck, who worked
for the German embassy in Washington,
D.C., in those years, setting up Nazi front
groups, and who is known to have been a Kinsey correspondent.Furthermore, the Rockefeller Foundation was simultaneouslyfunding eugenics projects in Berlin.
Kinsey consistentlykept secret his hypotheses and the basic facts upon which his conclusions rested, Dr. Reisman charges.
"Neither Kinsey nor any of his team can
rightly be termed 'scientists.' Theirmethodology was not scientific, for it was neither
able to be replicated nor validated. Their data
was anonymous, forced, secretly altered at
will. and fraudulent. With the aid of the elite
academic world and institutionsand the support of public funds and the social planning foundations, Kinsey and his associates,
who served as his own private male harem,
conducted thousands of sexual interviews to
present a false view of American sexual
behaviours ."
Amazingly, however, use of Kinsey data
as authoritativehas never been seriously challenged-until now. It must not continue, Dr.
Reisman declares: "There [must] be a full
and open public investigation into Kinsey's
fraudulent data and its impact upon lawmakers, the military, the church, the press,
the academic world, the family and all our
institutions."
-Kevin E. Abrams
Vancouver writer Kevin E. Abrams is co-authorof
The Pink Swastika: HomosexualityIn The Nazi Party.
"Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences can be ordered by calling
1-800837-0544.
38 June 29,1998
Alberta Report
other criminal acts. Those acts were then portrayed by Kinsey as both commonplace and
natural. Kinsey's mission, Jones writes in
Alji-ed Kinsey: A PublidPrivate Life, was to
free America from Victorian "repression."
But his wider goal was an amoral new order - possible only if human life is unhinged from the divine.
Kinsey, like Margaret Sanger and
population planners of the early 20th
century, was a eugenicist who eschewed biblical standards of morality.
According to one Kinsey associate:
"Kinsey knew a great deal about the
Judeo-Christian tradition and he was
indignant about what it had done to
our culture."
How did the acceptance of criminal sexual behaviors and perversions
begin in America? Kinsey's studies
were accepted as "scientific authority"
to alter the American common law
view of marriage. Life's most intimate
and personal act was equated with degenerative behaviors as long as it was
done between "consenting adults."
Kinsey found help in his effort from
liberal French lawyer Rene Guyon of
0
"
B
sex by age eight or else it's too late"
IL
r
infamy.
Dr. Hany Benjamin, an inter54 national sexologist and an associate of
both Kinsey and Guyon, wrote in the
introduction to Guyon's 1948 book
Sexual Ethics:
Many . .. sex activities, illegal and
immoral, but widely practiced, are
recorded by both investigators . ..
Guyon speaking as a philosopher,
and Kinsey, judging merely by empirical data . . . [upset] our most cherished conventions. Unless we want
to close our eyes to the truth or imprison 95% of our male population,
we must completely revise our legal
and moral codes .... It probably comes
as a jolt to many, even open-minded
people, when they realize that chastity cannot be a virtue because it is
not a natural state.
With such philosophical inspiration,
Guyon developed a deconstructed legal
theory, fortifying it with Kmsey's "scien-
tific" data. It was put into the hands of le- legislatures for their consideration, with
been apprehended. This recognition
gal radicals like Morris Ernst, an advocate plenty of authoritative support for its
that there is nothing very shocking or
for the new sexual order, who handled implementation provided by Kinsey's
abnormal in the sex offender's berevolutionary cases in his war against the flawed scientific analysis. Adoption of the
havior should lead to other changes
Model Penal Code eliminated and/or
American legal order.
in sex legislation .... Penalties should
Emst was well credentialed as a legal trivialized prior sex offenses, eventually
be lightened. In the first place, it
should lead to a downward revision
radical for his service as the American aiding the ~educrionof penalties for aborof the penalties presently imposed on
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney for tion, rape, wife and child battery, desersex offenders.
Alfred Kinsey, the Kinsey Institute, the tilon, seduction. adultery, prostitution,
Sex Information and Education Council of contributing to the delinquency of a mithe United States (SIECUS), and Planned nor, soliciting for masturbation, sodomy,
Biographer James Jones reports that
Parenthood of America. He had close ties public sexual exhibitions, "unfit" parent- Kinsey died believing that his crusade to
to Supreme Court Justices Brandeis, age, alienation of affection, and obscenity, promote more enlightened sexual attitudes
Brennan, and Frankfurter, and Judge as well as infanticide, premeditated AIDS/ had not succeeded. Yet in 1957, a year after
Learned Hand - all influential progres- STD transmission, etc.
Kinsey's death, the Supreme Court in Roth
At the very time the ALI's Model Pe- v. U S . , a case handled by Ernst, relaxed
sives in moving American law away from
the absolute "Judeo-Christian moral sys- nal Code was being developed, there was the once protective American legal defitem" which protected the
nition of obscenity. In
1961, Illinois became the
sanctity of life, marriage,
flrst state to repeal its
and family.
Trolling through homosexual bars
sodomy statute, and today
In Ernst's 1948 book
less than half of the states
Amel-ican Sexual Behnvand nightclubs, Kinsey gathered
retain sodomy statutes. In
ior and the Kinsey Rethe subjects for his research,
1973, Dr. Mary Caldeport, Kinsey colleague
rone, a leading Kinseyan,
Robert Dickinson noted
drawing disproportionately from
was cited in the Roe v.
that "an era of hush-andthose pifrtidpating in sexual
Wade decision which lepretend in the life of our
galized abortion. Since
nation may end" through
perversions and other criminal acts.
Roe a staggering 34 milKinsey's Sexual Behavior
lion babies have been
in the Human Male and
aborted. Also in 1973, the
that "virtually every page
of the Kinsey Report touches on some sec- a growing public outcry for tightening, American Psychiatric Association retion of the legal code . . . a reminder that not loosening, sexual psychopath laws. moved homosexuality from its list of psythe law, like . . . our social pattern, falls la- But respected magistrate Morris Plas- chopathologies, and in 1995, pedophilia
mentably short of being based on a knowl- cowe, the model code's principal author, was removed. Today, Kinsey's fingerargued (based on Kinsey's findings of prints are all over the current literature of
edge of facts."
Ernst expkined in Scientific Morzrhly course) that "When a total clean-up of sex law, medicine, and the social sciences.
why the Kinsey reports were making ma- offenders is demanded, it is, in effect, a For example, in Westlaw, a database of
jor inroads in changing American law: proposal to put 95 percent of the male the major national law journals, during the
"[Rlecently law has reached for scientific population in jail .... Of the total male period 1982-96, 499 authors cite Kinsey
tools to aid in its search for truth .... I now population 85 percent has had pre-marital versus 71 citations for the more recent
Kinseyans, Masters and Johnson. In the
say that the Kinsey Report is the single intercourse...."
As America's common law was sup- Science Citation and Social Science Citagreatest contribution of science to the
rule-making part of the law in my life- planted, legal penalties were "lightened" tion Indices, Kinsey rates thousands of
time .... The Kinsey Report broke through and new sentencing guidelines were de- listings, twice as many as Freud.
Continued belief in and use of Kinsey's
veloped. For example, prior to Kinsey rape
a mass of taboo."
Emst advised that every bar association was extremely serious, a death sentence data may be viewed as a contributing facin the country "should establish a Com- being required in three states and life in tor to the current exhaustion of our crirnimittee on the Laws of Sexual Behavior prison in over 18 states. But Plascowe in- nal justice system. Authorities who permit
and consider its own State's legal system troduced to the legal profession what Kin- the killing of the unborn and release sadistic rapists/murderers back into society, to
in this field ...." Soon Committees were es- sey and Guyon had certainly envisioned:
typically repeat their crimes, represent a
tablished with funding from the Rockesystem adrift in an amoral abyss and bent
One of the conclusions of the
feller Foundation in an effort to overturn
on anarchy and national destruction. H
Kinsey report is that the sex offender
the American way of life.
IS not a monster . . . but an individual
- COL.RONALD
D. RAY,USMC (RET.)
In 1955, the Model Penal Code was
who is not very different from others
completed under the auspices of the
Col. Ray, a former Depury Assrsrant S e c r e t a ~ yof
In his social group, and that his beCarnegie- and Rockefeller-seeded AmeriDefense, is the author of Military Necessity and
Homosexuality. In writing this artrcle, the author
havior is similar to theirs. The only
can Law Institute (ALI), the education
r's
largely dreh. fr-om Dr. Judirh R e ~ s ~ n a ~dejinirive
difference is that others in the
arm of the American Bar Association.
book on Kinsey, whrch is scheduled for release in
offender's social group have not
This "model" was then submitted to state
early 1998.
THE NEWAMERiCAN / JANUARY
19. 1998
Kinsey Crimes
By Lawrence 1[: Newman:
During World War IT, Nazi dociGrs twk young. i n n ~ x c dcluldrm
;utd suhjcctcd &.c:ttl to eruct, pep
vcrtcd n ~ c d i dexperinrents. Ac- curding to thc d o ~ t o r the
s brture of
tllcsa cluldrcn WQJ valid and acceptable, b c u i ~ s ci t ws done for the
lrdvsncmentofscintifickn~ldge.
ARcr all. it was all dorm in the n m c
of scicncc. Vdidating c i h k i d bcllavior tva? part of the Nazi c r d ,
but thmkfully would never be accepted iit hisrica, right?
Not fu hotn shcre you livc, you
u ~ l find
l thc Kin~cyInstitute for Research in Sex, G c n d c r , ~ dReptaductiorr Located in R l u o n ~ g t o n ,
Indima, it IS pai-t of Indiana Utliverslty. Ohe OF thc lcadcr~in higher
cducat~onin tlre state. It1 sotne quartrrs, the Kintey Iristitute is also
dccmcd as a Icadcr in hlucation,
obtain~nefinx&l support from the
National Inshtute of Ment~lHdh,
the Rockcfcllcr Foundation, and the
N.1riorl.11 Rt.scarch Council, among
othcr r c c ~ ~ r ~ iorgani.ritiotrs
ted
,
The Kioscy Iristitutc ig n a n d for
AIfrcd Kinsey.szm~ogisttchotwncd
to thc tie13 of sex research in the
1 Y W s K m c p published w d
&h-,iot in tlref-lwnao Malein 1948,
follo;r.cd by Scxual Bchavior in$J$
&pn
Fcmale in 1953 Kirisey
doctrlnc strongly $uppods arty md
all forms of sex, d ~ e t h c rlegal or
illcg:il Tcday,dlevalidityof ICltucy's
research into human sexual~tyis undcr cotistxit attack. Kinsey's adult
" S C I E ~ I ~subjects,"
~~~C
accorduig to
Alfrcd C Kniseve-
(0 m a -
of"^- fimd
els.
Kinsey's reseatch:kol~;stin~.
child
rxplailstion, ricariou~sexual p t i ftcation, child solichatim, child seduction, sexual hmry.sexual misconduct with a m h r , i n m ?&kt
of3depcndenf ~ ~ r i r and
m c, h i -
nal reck~rsm~ss.
Nationally, all 50 dates have outlawd the many behaviors glorified
by Kinzey in his publication:. Of
note ar* the crimts a f profes4anal
voyeurism, which is defined ; ~ the
s
exminxtian ofa person for &a purpose of sexual arousd, gratification.
or stimulation, including a mental
healthprof~simalvieuingapzsnn's
private anatomy; sexud conduct by
a pubtic senant. which is defined u
conduct of a sexual nature committed
by a public servant a&g under
Lifc by wcll.rcpardccl historian James
the color of his office; md abuse of
11. Jones, "tvere pcoplc rvtio were
citllcr on thc rrtargit~sor beyond the position of trust or authority, which
of errpaging in sexual conp d ~hotr~oscsuals,
:
s a d o t r ~ a s ~ l ~ ~cotrsists
ts,
d
u
c
t
~
~
iachild
t h where the adult is in
voyeurs, cshibitionists, pcdophiIes,
a position of trust or authority o m
transsexuals, trmsvestitcal fetishists.
"Pedcplrilc" is the scicn[ific~wrdfor thc child.
Federal laws similarly impost
chrld n~olcstcr.
What tvas Kinscy's interest in child lrcavy penalties for sexual acts against
nrolcstcrs? &ult Boha\ior it1 thq children of the kind comnrittcd in
l l u r n a ~hhlc features 5 tabtcs dc- Kinscy's research. It i s an aggrascribing the sesual stitnulation of vated felony under federal law lo
pre.adolescentchildren, beginnirlg at engage in a sexual act or sexual
tlic age of t\\a motiths. Kitiscy never contact with anyone under the agc of
revcaicd tl~csource of his rrscarch. 12. A persot) comnrits the federal
Nearly 50 },cars later, Kinsey col- felony of aggravated sexual abuse
Icagues claim that the information by causing another person to engage
came from onc or morc pcdophilcs in a scxual act by forcc, or by thrcstintervicwd by I ( I I ) ~ cAccording
~.
cning or placing that other person in
to t l ~ tcyotts.
s
thc child nioltstcrs fear that hemill besubjcctcd to death,
September 20,1997
TNDLANA HERALD
Herald Times
BLOOMINGTON,
INDIANA
OCTOBER
28,1997
1997/10/26 CONSERVATIVE GROUP AlTACKS KINSEY DATA Consewtive group attacks Kinsey data - with photo
Speakers demand research methods be investigated, want institute closed
By Mike Wright Sunday Herald-Times
Claiming Indiana University and Kinsey Institute officials haw lied about
the origins of 50-year-old data on sewal responses of children, Concerned
Women for America speakers continued their call Saturday for a congressional
investigation of Kinsey.
CWA sponsored the rally at the Monroe County Courthouse "to expose and
close Kinsey." About 100 attended, including some 10 to 20 displaying signs
fawring Kinsey or opposing CWA.
In a few cases, those trying to display signs fawring a different agenda
than CWA's or to wice questions were confronted and arguments became heated.
After the speakers concluded, several debates and confrontations occurred in
several spots around the courthouse lawn.
The focus of the speakers at the rally continued to be institute founder
Alfred Kinsey's chapter in Sewal Behavior in the Human Male, published in
1948, regarding sewal responses of preadolescent males, particularly the
information in table 34 of the book that documents orgasms.
"We believe the information in that table was fraudulently and criminally
derisd," said Carmen Pate, i c e president of CWA. "We believe it is time to
say enough is enough."
Similar questions were raised in 1995, based on a book by Judith Reisman,
when the Family Research Council urged congressional inquiry into the issue.
A bill by Texas Republican Steve Stockman headed in that direction but the
measure failed to mow forward.
CWA has redwd the issue and is conducting rallies around the country to
try to bring it up in Congress once again.
Reisman said the Kinsey Institute's assertions that all information in
Kinsey's book came from intenn'ews and that the institute has n e w
experimented or sanctioned experiments with children is a lie.
In her talk Saturday, Reisman cited Kinsey's own work that suggests "nine
of our adult male subjects have obsetwd such orgasm." And, she asked, how
did Kinsey obtain juvenile sperm?
Kinsey Institute John Bancroft said Saturday that the nine male subjects
were inteniew subjects who told about their observations and experiences.
Information from those men was used in the chapter on preadolescents, but not
in the table 34, he said.
Information in table 34 came from one individual, Bancroft said, contrary
to conflicting statements about the source.
"There is no doubt in my mind that (information on) the kids reported on
in those tables all came from one man," he said. "There was no indication
that he did any of this at the request of Kinsey. All he did was make the
information amilable for Kinsey to use."
And while the nine men may have been technically trained, as CWA claims,
there is no evidence they were trained by Kinsey, Bancroft said. Finally, he
said Kinsey did not collect preadolescent sperm
"He got data from scientists around the world," Bancroft said. "He didn't
collect it himself. They've been trying to pin this on Kinsey, but they are
barking up the wrong tree."
CWA maintains, howewr, that flawed Kinsey data is responsible for many of
today's social ills, including the high divorce rate and increased numbers of
rape.
Bancroft has called those assertions "ridiculous."
"Kinseyism is a failure," said rally speaker Eunice Ray, founder of RSVP
America (Restore Social Virtue and Purity to America). "There are still
absolutes and standards for conduct and Kinsey lying won't change that"
Dr. Alfred Kinsey, far right, works on the manuscript for his Sexual
Behavior in the Human Female in this 1953 newsphoto. Its original caption proclaimed he had "divulged the scientific facts contained in his
new book
that, under their 'NEW FREEDOM,' American women are
ripping apart the old tradition of chastity before marriage and faithfulness after the ceremony."
...
N E W S OF INTEREST
h m rr.wn-illen "
that research
legitirnise the
tion of childre
Steve Stoc
lican congre
troduced a bi
congressional
find out if
tematic sexua
ren" in the re
by Kinsey.
"To ask
a b o u t sexua
children is lik
about sexua
women," said
as we shou
concentratio
done by Nazi
should we us
based on the p
ual abuse of c
Stockman w
Accounting O
ment's watch
detailed repor
A=,:,
May 1
by James Adams
Washington
months old could experience
orgasm, while a 13-year-old
boy was observed experiencing
26 orgasms in 24 hours.
For years the Kinsey Institute had refused to reveal
how its research was conducted, saying only that nine
researchers had been involved
and 317 boys observed. Rut
last week the insti(ute acknowledged that the data had been
obtained from the diary of a
paedophile, who had routinely
sexually abused young boys.
John Bancroft, director of the
Kinsey Institute for Research in
Sex, Gender and Reproduction
at Indiana University in Bloomington, said: "The material in
the tables comes from one man,
with incredible numbers of sex1121
~ r ~ r r i ~ n on
r e r
whirh hp
havp
In
ICP~
IC
'Grand Scheme'
Advanced by
Father of Sexual
did Kinsey and his supporters go to remake America's way of life? Reisman
has revealed that the K m e y team collaborated in human sexual experiments
on children to which their children
could not consent. But how could these
human experiments on thousands of little children have happened in America
during the 1930s and 1NOS? Or were the
experiments even conducted in America?
The brush with Congressional scrutiny caused The Rockefeller Foundation
to cease its funding of Kinsey. However,
with the knowledge that Kinsey's data
were hopelessly flawed, the Foundation
continued the "grand scheme." One avenue was through funding the American
Law Institute's Model Penal Code which
recommended major changes in American law largely based on the fraudulent
authority of Kinsey's sex research. Referring to SBHM, gynecologist and l n s e y
colleague Dr. Dickinson victoriously declared, in a 1948 book by ACLU lawyer
Morris Ernst, "A book can end an cia."
In Crimes C. Consequences, Reisman reveals how Kinsey's research was used
by ,men in the law like Ernst and others,
and in medicine by Dickinson and others, to permanently alter the American
Way of Life.
A book can end an era of "hush and
pretend." In Kinsq: Crimes and Coilscquences, Judith Reisman finally exposes
Kinsey's crimes masquerading as science and "hushed" up for 50 years as
Indiana University and his funders
"pretended" Kinsey was a conventional,
trustworthy, middle-American academic. Dr. Reisman has made it possible for
America to understand the Kinsey
cadre's deception, the deliberate misrepresentation of the Indiana zoologist, his
s, as well as the
ucation and the
US. Department of Health and Human
Services. Dr Reisman's scholarly drscoverres have had trternatlonal leg~slative
and sc~entificmport
'
,-., w.
38
Criminal Abuse
Now let us address the most controversial aspect of Kinsey's "research": child
sex experimentation. First. we learn from
Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences that
there exists considerable evidence that
Kinsey humelf. along with some of his associates, participated in, or observed, sexual experiments involving children. Dr.
Reisman calls these incidents "genital experiments" and remarks that they involved
"observing, recording, and filming of
revolution, divorce, venereal diseases (in- will be the final consequence of Kinsey's
cluding AIDS), rape, sexual brutality to- crimes. Dr. Reisman has performed a magwards children, illegitimacy, suicide, psy- nificent service in writing her book and in
chological maladies, and hosts of other in- exposing Kinsey for the charlatan he undividual and social disorders have in- questionably was.
It must be emphasized that, although this
creased sharply, while the birth rate among
middle-class Americans has fallen below overview of Kinsey: Crimes and Consereplacement level. Those are some of the quences is lengthy as book reviews go, we
consequences of Kinsey's crimes. Our en- have only touched the surface of the nutire society has become coarse, tasteless, merous issues discussed by the author, and
rude, and tawdry to an extent that would of the many aspects and ramscations of
have been utterly beyond the imagination Kinsey's sex revolution and its disastrous
of the citizens of this land in the halcyon influence on modem American life. The
book is published in large-format (7'k10"),
days of 1948.
is composed of ten chapters, and includes
numerous photos, tables, and charts, along
Temporary Condition
There are other consequences. The ris- with footnotes citing the author's sources.
Finally, it is necessary to warn readers
ing moral anarchy of our time, which has
been and is actively encouraged by a cor- that Dr. Reisman has been forced by cirrupt and corrupting ruling elite, can never cumstances to present information in her
be a permanent situation. Anarchy is al- valuable book that is clinically explicit,
ways a temporary condition. Before im- and often shocking, repugnant, and horriposing a dictatorship on Russia, the Com- fying. Unhappily, there is no way to premunists countenanced just such moral sent the case against Kinsey and his Instichaos, releasing hordes of criminals from tute, and expose their crimes, without such
jails, malung divorce easy, and abolishing details. It would appear that our poor counlaws against adultery, homosexuality, and try has sunk so deeply into slime that. in
various sexual crimes. That anarchy served order to pull her out, we are compelled to
to justify the subsequent repression. A to- put aside our squeamishness.
- FR.JAMESTHORNTON
talitarian scenario, if it comes to pass here,
'
nrnnar
nIVI
ncrunl
But Cornell is not alone. Campus Report quotes New York University Press's Out of the Closets, a widely used text in
homosexual studies courses, as saying, "Face it, nice bodies and
young bodies are attributes, they're groovy." The author, Carl
Wittman, says that "kids can take care of themselves, and are
sexual beings way earlier than we'd like to admit. Those of us
who began cruising in early adolescence know this, and we were
doing the cruising, not being debauched by dirty old men."
No Scandal Here
Despite their intense interest in some sex scandals, the media have
continued to refuse to provide the details about this one. 'This is a sex
story," comments Robea Knight of the Family Research Council,
"and it should be a huge story." One explanation for the cover-up may
lie in the realization among supporters of Kinsey that the
to
--
~ h eobviodfhew
j
him as
they ehein:. He h i beehlac&y of suffering from %curable
brain damage;" &d he has b&n labdeb an ally of "America's
rabid Christian rightVIfhehas an a g e d ' it is reflected in one of
the final segments of the film, where a victim of one of Kinsey's
pedophiles, Esther White, is intemewed. Breaking down in tears,
she recalls how her father abused her as a child and recorded the
"data" for Kinsey. She calls for an official investigation of Kinsey
and hisinstitute and expresses astonishmentthat bothKinsey books
are being republished.
Kinsey, who was presented to the public in the 1940's and 50's as a
devoted husband, father, and family man, is unmasked in the film
as an active but closeted homosexual who even developed a taste for
films showing sexual masochism. He was so twisted sexually that he
circumcised himself with a pocket knife without anesthesia.
Book Reviews
Sex the &leaswe ofAll Things: A Life ofAlfred C. Kinsry.By Jonathan
Gathorne-Hardy. (Bloornington: Indiana University Press, 2000.
Pp. xi, 5 13.Illustrations, appendices, notes, bibliography, index.
$39.95.)
torted,
50 many ways
JAMESW. RICBD,pr~Ic!ssorof history at Rutgcrs University-Ncr Brung~yiek,New Jersey, is the author of Thc Birth Co~rrrolMo~*emcnt
arid Americn~~
Socir.tj9: FIorn Private Iricc to Public Vinur (1988)and is currently nt work on "The Road to Viogra:
Bionwdical Scx Resriirch and Am:rican Society."
_-.---,
S
>-T,
OLD
fl intefestingFirst Amend-
ual behavior but to alter attitudes. to undermine the traditional norms of morality. And .
that he did.
As Dr. Judith Reisman wrote a '
decade ago, in his chapter on '
Child Sexuality in "Sexual-'
Behavior in the ~merican.'
Male" Kinsey & Co. claimed,
co-uuthors, shown in 1953.
that, based on scientifically
validated methods, theq; had
contained- nine malea with
proven that children, including
known histories of child molesinfants. "sought adult sexual attation. and b) Of the 317 children
tention naturally and that they
subjected to "varied and repeat- '
were generally unharmed by
ed" sexual stimulation (three of.
adult and child sexual acts -inthem for 24 hours straight).
clusive of fondling' and inter;
many
trembled.
wept.
course
and that in man
screamed, fainted, went into
sakes children were benefit&
convulsions and fought their
and enriched thereby:'
"pPrtners" (Klneey'h term for
Here, wrote Dr. Reisinan, i s
the criminals sexually abusing
the root of the idea that "chil- . them):
I
dren are viable sex objects" ~ h & eare only two ways Kinthe idea NAMBLA wants writs e y could have confirmed the
ten into law. .
precise reactions of those chilReisman's own analysis of Dr.
dren. One is to have collaboKinsey's work found that: a)
rated in molesting ihem. in
The experimental team used a t
which case Kinsey ought to
the Indiana Institute for Sex Rehave been horsewhipped. The
search (now Kinsey Institute)
second is to have relied on the
testimony of pedo~hiles.whose
reports abouf the responses of
Dr. Alfred K;nsey,
children they molested a r e
about a s scientificahy valid as
N A W A rnes&h,
the testimony of a rapist about
was U charlatan, .:
how much his victim "enjoyed"
the assualt.
a fraud and very '
In a new book, "Degenerate
Moderns" (Ignatius Press), E.
possibly U serjd
Michael Jones further investigates Dr. Alfred Klnsey.
child molester.
In the name of science. Jones
writes, A1 Kinsey gathered the
--
limdd~@%DenjS!
Wednesday, March 15, 2000
The sexual revolution was based on a lie. Judith Reisman has spent thirty years
uncovering the fmth. (National Review, May 19,1997)
The truth she uncovered is that the revolution began with Dr. Alfred Kinsey in
1948. Moreover, all accreditation in the field of American sexology flows from
his fraudulent data. Dr. Reisman's primary interest in Kinsey's sexuality data is
its toxic impact on chldren -- as revealed in her latest book, "Kinsey, Crimes &
Consequences."
The main pipeline for dispensing Kinseyan sexuality to American school
children has been the public schools. Their teachers are meticulously trained by
the Sex and Information Council of the United States (SIECUS). Founded in 1964
at the Kinsey Institute in Bloomington, Indiana, SIECUS was created by leading
Kinseyan proponents of the emerging American sexuality field. Sex industry
entrepreneurs like Hugh Hefner eagerly bankrolled SIECUS. As a result,
accredited academic sexperts now uniformly testify before juries and judges that
pornography -- once considered a vice -- is harmless today, and even therapeutic.
Tlus week the emerging rival to SIECUS, the National Abstinence Clearinghouse
(NAC), telegraphed a startling announcement: After 12 years as president and
CEO of SIECUS, Debra Haffner will resign on May 31,2000. Ms. Haffner is
returning to the seminary. But Haffner's dash to the seminary must not be
misread as repentance. She is not retreating. Rather, this move is calculated to
advance her revolutionary faith. She plans to further "educate"the Church with
the SIECUS "anything goes" philosophy. This includes Kinsey's fraudulent claim
that, "children are sexual from birth." As a Kinseyan disciple, Haffner's mission
has always been to liberate cluldren for sexual activity by:
Stimulating youngsters with "teaching aids" like SIECUS-sanctioned
pornography
Training students in methods for "safer sex"
Dispensing condoms in elementary school
h t t p : / / w w w . w o r l d n e t d a i l y . c o m / r e a d e r s e ~ O O 15
3 -xex-kinseys-fiau. shtm 311 5/00
Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3
Despite NAC's healthy results, SIECUS receives the lion's share of government
funding. Backed by the folks at CDC, SIECUS is charging ahead of the
competition with a new National School Health Education Clearinghouse. This
agency will provide access to so-called "model"programs and policies, curricula
and curricula evaluations, sexuality education, and teacher training. In short, the
same failed Kinseyan-based programs are being recycled. Twenty years ago,
doctors in "good communities" might treat one case of venereal disease in a
month. However, since the advent of SIECUS, many doctors see such cases daily
-- the majority suffering from cancer-producing HPV.
But Ms. Haffner is not satisfied with mainlining Kinsey to our children in
school. She is now bringng her "anything goes" gospel into the Church. Yet
Christ's teachings on purity, marriage and family living are clear. Only the
marital act is sanctioned by Scripture -- which leaves no argument for Haffner's
perverted sexuality theories.
For Haffner's tactics bring us back full circle to zoologist Kinsey. In 1948 -- as
Reisman discovered -- he simply repackaged the ancient theology for modern
sensibilities under a "scientific"covering. Beginning in the post-World War II
generation, Kinsey espoused its tenets: Man, as creator, is the measure of all
things. Therefore, humans are unbound by moral or biological constraints. In
fact, SIECUS' first director, Mary Calderone, called Kinsey's sexual liberation
gospel a "new religion." Kinsey caustically berated the negative effect of the
"inaccuracies"and "paranoia"fostered by the narrow Christian religion. Now
Haffner's missior is to correct these "inaccuracies."Like the proverbial wolf in
sheep's clothing, Haffner will minister to the Church the ancient worship of the
male and female generative powers -- all in the name of sexuality and
reproductive rights.
The aftermath of the Sexual Revolution of the 60s is now painfully obvious.
Kinsey has subverted American culture. He called his method science, but
religion was always his goal. His pseudo science opened the door to the
toleration of more and more perversity in the body politic. And many in the
Church have been compromised. Now the high priestess of sexuality training,
Debra Haffner, will use the covering of seminary to gain the credentials
necessary to complete Kinsey's mission within the Church body.
Eunice Van Winkle Ray is the founder of RSVP America. To read more articles like this one, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com~
http:l/www.worldnetdaily.com/readerse~
-friendl...I200003 15-xex-kinseys-fi-au.shtm 311 5/00
KlNSEY
continued from Page
Details of the
late AMed Kinmy's personal
sex life are discussed in a
new b i i p h y .
The Indianapolis Star
Tuesday, August 19, 1997
jO2/24 1-5552
D R ALFRED Klrucy,
By PATRICKI
celebrated author of the
" K l r w r Rewrtr" of'
In a critlcd chapter d
thmo h e a d t i a m w u
d t b u a ~ l t t t t l n cfraud h t nr.1 book oa chlld
w
oollaboralqr la ~ a & l l t y *W
y ud
' cdmlnd chlld LkUd
w1kague.a
contended
Elther b. n a l r e d hlr UtrZ bucd u p thelr
data ocr achlCd wxuallty" dentlffc.1Iy vIlldc(ed
from k n o r n chlld molu- method.,
thor
had
that ehlldrea
to v l d n ru
--
b l u c o ~ ~
md L h . 1
y c u c r chlldraa
la w
I.to k p d h b d b ~ ~ ..umaurl
r .
d Klawy-8
Judltb A Rdraug
p(d)
0-d----yL.
Ir
-1-
/m7 ?By
*-
Wd-
-fa
dl,.
eorer,hrdk.sdtdlw
&- tho kdan d a gather-
y ~ lh . ' h a n h W l d a
YorrJ #
H.kauaboaQaqt,W
that-FhlL(iu,*labk
nu
W ~ k d r t O . l H I , ~
t b r m m e d t h e ~ took---d..
R,p&,-&,",dBcb.*.
#tbtrutb.adeilu-
b r l a t h a H u m u ~ "d..chlcrldetlm
&Atd
cr q u q co
.doum?u
mymk
-fa
,mck om cbW wrurllty.
c - : t 2 #.I
i. : .;
. 11. .
I . .
. . a
Assaulting
the 'most
vulnerable
PBCl
88 'ON
Point of View
Kinsey's book
th chapter on
CWsexuality- is s eeped in pe-
a d
to strang& +use
it
might frighten them. He claimed
m t tmisodrtll disappmd of sor
acts between adults and
posed more hum to the
than the acts themselves. I
to
dophilia.
In fact, one of the chapters in
gem
9"""
%E
Thirtyone
later. a1lone red e r , Ju th R+mq, Ph.D.,
began drawing attenhon td the fact
that the tables in Kinsey's Chapter
Five translated to little more than
Tt"
abuse chi1
that
by ffPhiles
n 4 o y sex
evidence
with
adults, we discovemdthat Kiasey's
la
detail-
relptiomhips with h b i u a d
molesters wem considerably more
extensive than had aver been revepled. curio*,
Klnse 8 all e a p s did no! want to
his
relationships with pedophiles, they
d;oy
name that
-1LFRED KINSEY
Reflections in the mirror
of
Venus
Russia Threaten!
Our Sea Power
BY GEORGE FIELDING ELIOT
LOOK Magazine, r
3-
!.,
;,iilg
\he t. : i q
,..,
per
S~rre
3 r~l!;r.i.ts01;
th2 R l ~ s e y
. r q i r>
tu:n
. ot.:w:.i
T~IG
.ri;-,t-r,
t n r?ic
,:. r;bvil:r, a: b , ;
3r.:- "?:!';
1;: 3 . r ; t : .
:,I
,, ,
, ):
. ,
1 !:,:. . . .
;:, .' ~ . iI : !
5,
:.I:;, .:
;.I
7:i;
l!ii!!,
..:uj-
. .of I),,:
,ti
)
. .:T,:A
,,!-,,,<,..tt:);bj
;,~
;,{
rt?prl
5 WI.,,~
.hnc.:. cf .;h?
!.~.!i: ;
t;:.
-.,;-.:i,
,?<,
yL,-o?";:
ht:,
1,':
E~~.I:..I:~
-\
!.I'
:I1 Wh'
;.'s Ir;cr;3;:
':-,,;. Ii,,,>.$+L!
t:.! r j ~ r , i + :kc! , ! I t o? !-.i* !:*<r
*ill
;1 < i R.!
Yi ,, .r,ri<'7-.c:,a,
: ;:3">,'
.:,;:,, : , ? ~ l + % *K;rx.?!,
.
' & ;r:.f. 2 , : :%!:.:
-21r ? V ,
.
;r.,k+:,];.
.,.:i: y , , , , r.,>,.;) t ( , < , r , ~ , % ~ i . , 7 F..
!:L:>l>; L! k:i:
: r , 1 c.,,
/ T I ~ msc
,
: >!<: .-.:.,3v
s.
: ~ , > l l i , : - < ) , <:;y,
5. :JW!:-, . < I . ! Y;.. 2 ,
: . {!.
; ! ~;,<r '::!:;gcy
RS:!y::.;" ,: :',<.
:i) in
,. ..
' ,- :'t,c !:rbl
t x < e v.:,li.i!~5 . *.I;:
I +;re.,
,!,-I: ,an.:
tc,r!:tj :'" i!.?, ,-,I .,. :-;h dg!2 !i.:
. , ,:hi:t,:31 ~,:r.?:?fi,
t'
' 1 '!, ?,,I.: I::,'. h~
.~:ri.:, ;+=,T.:
s,,
5: fui
>,,.>.>I:
1,1,
, I
(<.y#,&:*s
L'** \ C I ,
iL
.
.n.
,,>*,
n;yi,.:I.
i.: :'r+r-~'~!r~:?n..
L;:!
,'
;..,
:.:
'.
s.;,.-;...-
*-.+, .>-:
F?c,~:.L..Lt!iil:..., I.:<.
;1&
rr. .?.,1, i o - l L ~ 1 ; ? 1 i , .
+ F , L ,,Y, <.,FCC:! !:I!: l l , ? I.;;:,.
.,
i;
4:;*
.-.-<- -
=;?.b'
?,;:!:
- ,'I,,
i ;
! .a'??.
: ! . , T;]; I!?
:. ?;,
.s
l!:;.>;.
..ir..:l:j:;
294
SEX: F R O M NO-NO'S T O A N Y T H I N G G O E S
Attachment 3:
Pornographic Sexuality Courses
Spread to Catholic
Seminarians!
GOODBYE! G O O
Michael S. Rose
Foreword by
Alice von Hildebrand
Newsweek
November 1, 1993
P-
It's Academic?
-AN
Dececco
Course Reader
1 FRANCISCAN
SHOPS
NEW TEXT
'!
uam H B X U ~ / P
4-333-02237-8
HMSX 490
~ Y ~ H J
126
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
Origins and Uses of the Word Fuck
.....................................................1
....................................................65-82
WHEREAS
SENSUAL I LEASURES
Eac .r c h i l d Iran t h e right t o fully e n j o y
t h e r e n a u a l p l e a s u r e . c o m a y feel
w i t h o u t *ha n e o r g u i l t .
LEARNING THE A R T O F L O V E
A U c h i l d r e n h a v e t h e right to l e a r n
the art of love beg.nning at a n y a g e
c o i s able to u n d e r s t a n d , j u s t a s c o
is e n t i t l e d to l e a r n a n y o t h e r a r t o r
skill.
CHOICE O F A SEX P A R T N E R
E v e r y child h a s tht: r i g h t t o loving
r e l a t i b n r h i p s , including sc!xual,
with a parent, sibling o r o t h e r re s p o n s i b l e adult o r c h i l c , and s h a l l b e
p r o t e c t e d and aidetl i n doing so by
being provided wit11 c o n t r a c e p t i v e s
and a i d s t o p r e v e n t v e n e r e a l disease.
4-
SUPPRESSION
E a c h child has t h e r i g h t to be
protected from any form of s e x
r u p p r e s s i o n a t h o n e o r i n s o c i e t y so
t h a t in adulthood cc w i l l bc ca-pablr
of living c o s s e x 1i:'e a c c o r d i n g t o
c o s n a t u r a l d e s i r e : and no: a c c o r d ing t o the d i c t a t e s o f tradition.
OPPORTUNITY TC1A C K N O W L-
EDGE SEXUALITY
C h i l d r e n should halre t h e o:?portunlty
t o acknowledge what t h e y know and
feel about t h e i r ncxuaKty
umed:
.e
November gth:1998
MARSHA
RUKTZ,M.A.
li'nibersity of Manitoba
survey was administered ro 193 male undergraduate studenrs regarding their sexual i lteres: in children.
we!l as their responses to a number of questions theoretically relevant to pedophilia. In tot: 1. 21% of subjects
reported sexual atfraction to some small children. 9 5 described sesual fantasies involving c h ~ l d n.
r ~5 % admitted to
kaving masturbated to such fantasies. and 7 @indicated
~
some likzlihooj of having sex with a child if they could avoid
c?e:cc:ion and punishment. These sexual interens were associated with negative early sexual experiences, masrurba:ion to pornography, self-reported likelihood of raping s woman, frequent sex partners. sexual can lifts, and a.titudes
supponive of sexuai dominance over women. The d a u did not, however. s u p p n clinical theofits rqarding sexual
repression or impulse-control problems among potential pedophiles.
,\bstrsct-A
3s
EducatLon B a s e
Indiana
University
Planned
Parenthood lnt.
Research
Founded in New
York 1916
Foilnded
Nationally 1971
Kinsey Institute
1938
-
I
I
Kin sey
Porneroy
Wein berg
Gebhard
Gagnon
Martin
Simon
Alan
--
Guttmachq
inst.
Founded N e w
York
Masters
Technical
Johnson
1959
Assistance
Branch of PPFA
I968
SSSS
circa I978
11
1964
11
1968
Sexuality StudentsKeachers
To Receive a Human Sexuality Degree, Certification, Credential, etc., All Applicants Are
Required to Undergo the SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) a "Model" Program of
Massive Pornography/Obscenity, its Stated Mission One of "Desensitization."
ri--l
1
1
Educatm 0-ase
Planned
1nd
a
;i
University
'Credentialing"
parenthood lnt.
Founded in New
York 1916
Founded
Nationally 1971
1
I
Kinsey Institute
1938
Simon
Bell et al.
Alan
Gutbnache~
irrst.
Founded New
York
Technical
Assistance
Branch of PPFA
1968
circa 1978
The Mandated SAR
1964
1968
1-
'Physicians psych-
Sexuaiiiy Students/Tbachers
I
t s , s 8 x d o g i s 4 t h & r a p k i 3 , 0 ~ 1 ) ? ~ ~ ~ ~
+ep~rsrnurna~psyEhretrfs~~-rfirers.~.rkrra*p.non.~.
~ g m ~ ~ p I m M g e w H a v s a n d ~ a n d ~ h r N m s b o v s i v l s s k "
W-f*
Attachment 4:
The SexoIogy-PedophiIiaPederasty Link
On the other hand, "Basic Sexual Right" number 8 (below) is also quite specific.
Since the IASHS advocates full sexual "rights" for children in its course studies,
the following "right" can be read for what it states-adults and children should not
be sexually "disadvantaged because of age." Graduates are expected to agree
that a child of any age ("every person") has the "right" to "consensual' sex with
other children or adults, familial or strangers, etc., whether in pornographic
activity, general sexual activity or in pecuniary sexual acts defined as prostitution.
8. The recognition by society that every person, partnered or unpartnered, has the right
to the purwit of a satisfying consensuaI socio-sexual life, free from political, legal or
religious interference and that there needs to be mechanisms in society where the
opportunities of social-sexual activities are available to the following: disabled persons; chronically ill persongthose incarcerated in prisons, hospitalsor institution^ those
disadvantaged because of age, lack of physical attractiveness, or lack of social skills;
the poor and the lonely.
MV
.-
. .
SEXURL
BEHAVIOR
In THE
Humun
IIlRLE
In.the course of his teaching, Dr. Kinsey found his students frequently asking questions on sex, a fact which impressed him increasingly
with the inadequacies of material existing on the subject.
As a resul~,he became 'convinced of the necessity for a s w e y of
sexual behavior, and most especially a survey of such detailed and comprehensive scope that its accuracy and validity would stand up under
the most penetrating scrutiny.
Nine years ago, therefore, and despite innumerable difficulties
amounting at t i m a to downright opposition, he launched his tremendous study.
Assisted by Wardell B. Pomeroy, clinical ps&hologist, Clyde E.
Martin, who is in charge of the statistical work, and a staff trained in
psychology, animal behavior, anthropology and related fields, Dr.
Kinsey has travelled the United States, coast to coast, border to border,
interviewing and gathering the data presented in this book and lecturing
before countless professional and lay groups.
The securing of interviews has carried the authors into all socioeconomic groups under the widest variety of circumstances. T o gain the
confidence of t h a e various groups, to get full cooperation in conducting
the interviews, has required endless effort and ingenuity. The development of interviewing technics has'been worked and reworked to assure
perfection, the l a t a t refinements in public-opinion polling methods
being utilized to best advantage.
It is no exaggeration to .claim this to be tho most difficult mass
interviewing project ever undertaken. Nationally known feature writers
on scientific subjects have already laid significant stress on M *.
Scientius, thunselva, describe it as one of the most valuable conuibutions made to date to the factual knowledge of human sexual behavior.
It is certain to be one of the most provocative books of our tima.
MADE IN US..\.
KINSEY
POMEROY
MARTIN
An Authoritzlti~c
Guide to Sa Edwtion
KINSEY ON SEX RESPONSE IN CHILDREN
ANY a
"M
MAY, 1954
VOLXX
HUGO GERNSBACK
Editor
S E X O L O G Y
25 W e s t B r o a d w a y
N e w Y o r k 7. N. Y.
NO.10
Sexes
/
\
I!
incest
ow did the 'lobby against the taboo come about? One strain ofits
H
philosophy springs from the fringes
I
/
i1
'
---
an-
of present rash of feverish adolescent sex[ ual activity outside the home."
--
53
Sexes
---
Cradile-to-Grave Intimacy
-
--
---
Some i-esca:chers openly argue that "anyrir ing goes ' ; P Ochildren
~
he preacfllngs of ~ e x s l i ~on
a ~c tu~d - ~ t people
h
older than themsei\es " What
r ~bu-and fireT h m d hav: not chang:d m d c a d e s sex iabout older mcn ~ r e ) l on
e d u c a t ~ o nm !ht schools o g m d g u l r , re- year-olds7 ConsLactlne u o d d argue that
prcsslon and p u u r h m e ~t for m a n u r b a - il cluldren u e r e properlr educated a b u t
tlon are bad. Now, h o w ver. a dtsturbing sex, s c h i d u h 3 61d i c t u a n t sex couid aiid- E.gamin.: currency , r i , h i ; i T i E - u a j s u ) no
bG'gE
Uou;eTi
Z i s )--h(,------~ ~ ~ ~ g c % d f i A
o h~mdr aU s e x o i o ~ puabcij
l~
swtc
y r y i ; i - a p e d . ~ that they o;.pox adult-sMd sex. but
? o ~ ? h i c I n f d sex c u i e ~ o m
~ rt e r l e r z t
number o f r e s u r c n e r s m a m u m that such
?roSp~i-Xi~a3-----"sex 1s basically ha,rxless to the child h o r - 7 h ~ a < i r d y p G e n t e d duectlyucgian Ps)iholoyst Thore L i n ~ f e l d ut ) s
most of the re:xzrchen. d x t o r s and coun- that a r l v s c ~ u a stm-dat~on
!
-o --m ,
seiors u ho believe 11 ha\: .he wit to
keep a low p r ~ . l ea n d \ L C \ . the ~ d u
away neat!). In a longer rlore w n vent~onalspeech or a n i i e The sug-
_*
Dr.
&%;;a;
'
THE INSTITUTE
FROM:
PSE/E, a month-long process usually offered one evening a week f o r four weeks
using-the guide-for a Better S& Life, video and sharing about homework,
will be offered i n a shortened form June 16-20 from 2:30-6 p.m. To prepare
for t h i s greatly speeded up process, please do the following before t h e group
begins:
Read the entire SARquide thoroughly and do a l l the homework possible before
coming t o PSE/E. G i v e yourself a t l e a s t a month. Begin t o keep a journal as
described i n the SARguide. Make your personal contract t o work on anything
that is real for you sexually.
1 of the week we will give you some brief one-to-one time with the group
lea-? e r as well as cover expectations and sharing of your at-home experiences.
On Da
Days 2 through 5 will be held as i f they are one week apart. Homework will be
repeated each night and shared the next morning.
Video will be utilized as i t
i s stated i n t h e - S ~ ~ q u i d e .
Maggi ~ u b e n s t e ~D.x A.
Director, Practi cum Studies
CAW&rx
#31-,
THE EX
1523 FRA
SAN FRANCI
(415) 928-1 133
ROUCRT
THEODORE
Mc
President
MARGUERITE RUBENSTEIN, Ph.0.. Dean of Students
WARDELL B. POMEROY, Ph
A.
B.
.
.
DEGREES
Credit may be given for prior work and
experience
Master of Human Sexuality
Completion of 3 trimesters of graduate
study plus one trimester for preparation
of a thesis; completion of a Basic
Research
Project:
passing
the
Comprehensive
Examinations;
completion of Master's thesis or project.
C
Associate in
prepares prof
questions an
education to th
required i5Z
education vide
developmenta
life span. Co
required for
Certificate. T
Clinical Sex
additional 15
following
implications o
and physiolo
erotology, se
treatment, sex
issues plus a
weekend cou
Institute. Tu
together with
Education Ce
Erotology C
graduate co
rninirn~mnf 1
Sexological
A!DS!STrZ Pr
upgrade the
AIDS or other
approximately
Tuition is $1,6
THE INSTITUTE
The mission of the lnstitute is to train
sexologists. The general objectives of
the lnstitute are:
* To provide a faculty of persons who are
both
academically
trained
and
professionally competent in the field of
human sexuality.
* To provide the means whereby people
working in the area of human sexuality
may receive additional academic and
professional training.
* To provide suitable rescjurce materials
consisting of a large library of films,
slides, audio and videotapes, a research
and basic source library.
* To provide academic guidance to
projects and dissertations.
* To create materials.
* To create an archive of historical and
contemporary sexoiogical materials to
sort, catalog and preserve it for the
future.
e
nrough viciec and aucfic; ie~oidifig,
io
record the history of our own Institute
and contemporary history of our field.
These recordings include formal,
scientific
presentations
and
autobiographical and anecdotal material
l - l
IN
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
AD
S
SE
Name
Address
a
.
ACADE
0
PROFE
CONTIN
The SAR Guide and Sex Education Videos which portray a range of human sexuality
The History of Sexology: Its basic concepts and terminoloav
~evelo~mental
sexology-Throughout the if e Span.
The 150 hours will include the reading of a Work Book composed of the SAR Guide with
integrated video viewing, personal exercises and monographs by Loretta Haroian and Erwin
Haeberle. Also there is reading of basic t e x t books and optional texts, the viewing of
select-edvideo tape materials and self testing.
HOURS
The following is a schedule of the approximate division of the 150 hours of credit for the
...............
Total
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
d'
hours
hours
150 hours
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Candidates for this certificate must complete and file with the Institute for Advanced Study
of Human Sexuality a report of their completion of the Work Book, reading of the basic texts
and materials from the recommended reading list, videos viewed, self-tests taken and
evaluatxon o m s found in the Work Book.
CERTIFICATE AWARD
upon completion of the above requirements an appropriate certificate,
will be awarded.
1.
0r
2.
3.
HOURS
The following is a schedule of the approximate division of the 150 hours of credit for
the Clinical Sexology Certificate.
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
.......
hours
156 hours
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Candidates for this certificate must conplete and file with the Institute for Advanced
Study of Human Sexuality a report of their reading of -the baslc texts and material from
the recommended reading list, videos viewed, self-tests taken, attendance at courses and
evaluation forms found In the work book.
CERTIFICATE AWARD
Upon completion of the above requirements an appropriate Certificate ill
be awarded.
C l h k d StZ010gy will
COSTS
Tuition for each program is $1,600.00. When taken together, the total cost is $3,000.00
or Yhe cost of one full trimester registration at the Institute. (This does not include
the $100 Application fee.)
The student must apply to and be accepted by the Institute.
materials must be sent to the Registrar:
1. An application form.
2. An application fee of $100.00 (non-refundable).
3. A resume including education and work in the field of human sexuality.
4. A letter of intent and interest briefly stating reasons for applying, education
and learning goals and a statement on human sexuality.
5. A current photograph.
6. Graduate and undergraduate transcripts from schools attended.
7.
Two letters of recommendation.
For more information, please contact Dr. Ted McIlvenna at 1523 Franklin Street, San
Francisco, California 94309, (415) 928-1133.
Copyright ( c ) 1996
Attachment 5:
Sexology Strategy for
"Sexual Attitude Restructuring"
Michael S . Rose
Foreword b y
Altce von Hlldebrand
AQUINAS PUBLISHING L T D
CINCINNATI
174 Flyers and registration form from 1988 "Reassessment of Sexual Attitudes" workshop conducted at Archdiocesan Cousins Center in Milwaukee.
A SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY
showcased on the big screen male and female m3sturba.tion, heterosexual and homosexual intercourse, and variations in oral sex. One particular film, entitled A iiipple qF
Time, depicted a 56-year-old woman and a 63- rear-old
man engaging in sexual games with a vibrator. ?'he program was protested for years, but it was not un5l 1988,
when a local Christian television station exposed rhe program during Milwaukee's prime time that the c:ourt o:f
public opinion forced the archdiocese to shut it dovm.
Weakland also endorsed and permitted, at l e ~ s since
t
1980, a four-week series titled "Homosexuality anti Its Impact on the Family," to be taught in his archdiozese for
many years, even after being repeatedly asked to cancel
the program, which did not at all reflect a Catholic, understanding or response to the issues of homosexualjty. This
sex workshop was taught by Milwaukee priest Fathe].
James Arimond, who also served as the chaplaix~of the
Milwaukee Dignity175 chapter, and was a regular columnist for Wisconsin Light, a member publication of -:he Gay.
and Lesbian Press Association. A two-page pron~otiona:.
flyer co-authored by Arimond and Leon Konieczn-y stated.
that the Catholic Church's moral theologians held "differ-.
ing viewpoints on the morality of homosexual acts. Wher.
making a moral decision.. .ultimately it is the indi.~idual'$
conscience which must be his or her guide. A Cathc~licmay
in good conscience make a decision not in total agi.eement
with Church teaching and still remain within the Cmrch if
'75
As of this w r i t i l ~ the
~ , Sex Iristi-
INSTITUTIONS
Private
Funders
RESEARCHERS
c
I Original
Sexuality
Researchers
INDIANA
Educators
Rockeleller
(Later. Playboy)
Calderone. Ramey.
Public
State, Federal
Taxes
1971
Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR)
(George Leonard, on SAR for ESOUIRE. THE END OF SEX. p. 24.)
.+-
SSSS
Study of Sex
Porneroy. Caldelwood.
Kwkendall, Gagnon
Money. Relss, Masters
&Johnson, Bell,
Marmor, Rub~n,
Christenson. etc
SSSS Board.
Founders
Pomeroy, Ellis, Beigei,
Gue, LeMekK Benjamm
George. Money,
SlECUS
Comrnlsslon
on Accreditation
Programs
"G"kYdaZ&%Z
Coleman. TlaQe,Amelar.
Upps, Hartman.
LOP!cG&, Moshw,S t y
Bvme. Schwartr
Sex Education
Curricula
Wardell Pomeroy
Wardelt Porneroy
Bryck Caldetwocd
Delyck Caldemood
Roberl Mclkenna
Mary Caiderone
Alan Bell
Lester Krrkendall
Paul Gebhard
Kenneth George
Vern Bullough
PLANNED PARENTHOOD
1942
,I.mi.'L
ASSECT
c,-.
American Assoc.
of Marrlage & Family
Counselors
--
--
-171
I
I
',
'
FUNDING
m
Original
Private
Funders
Rockefeller
Nil. Research
Coun. Cornm.
on Research
(Later. Playboy)
Public
Funders
State, Federal
Taxes
INDIANA
UNIVERSITY
THE KINSEY INSTITUTE
1938
INSTITUTIONS
'
1
Original Sexuality
Researchers
Educators
Kinsey. Pomeroy
Gebhard, Martin,
Gagnon, Masters &
Johnson. Money,
Simon. Schiller,
Caiderone, Ramey,
L~ef.Ellis, Benjamin
Calderwood. Tripp,
Reiss. Builough,
Mcllvenna, Haberlae.
Kolodny. etc.
(Later, Hundreds of
Kinsey Model
Disciples)
"'
f~;-nie
Report on Homcwxualiry m d Perso~;nelSecur n:' cited
Ki:ise!r,
P3mero)-,
Gebhard, Martin.
Ga :non, For'l, Beach,
an( Bell as PloD coniI
THE FIRST INSTITUTIONS GRANTING
su1:anrs. a i c nz wirh
HUMAN SEXUALITY DEGREES IN TEACHING, COUNSELING
1 RESEARCH. Ph.D.s. MASTERS, EDUCATION DECREES, SAFE SEX TRAINERS, ETC.
joz, m n i of Z ' d o p h i h
edi:or Vsrn Suilo~igh
anci pedoph le advocar: John &[onry.
Su:h men Ilt i p d give
a c nrer of"si ience" ro
the subsequenr D o D decision ro recommend the acceptancr of homosexuais in t. le militar;: A 199.3
Rand study of homosesualiry in rhe armed forces was similarly based in large p m on Kinseys data
and conclusions.
I
I
'"'
Manv of the Sex Instirure's sex films and videos have been disrribured by Focr s Inrernar.ona1 (FI)
ro universities and colleges narionwide. .enon? i t ; other "ert~ric"media. FI offers "The Kmsey Three (Herero, Homo ck Bisexua;ity)" and
"Abour Your Sexuality'' (for junior high children) Tht: iartcr frarures
scenes of condomless heterosexual and hon~osexu:lloral and anal sodom!-. All three centers (Sex Iilstiture, NkV, an l rhe Universiry of
Pennsylvania) have Long raughr sex using rhe Sexu 11 hrrirud~:Restrucr u i n s (SAN technique. Dr. Pomeroy has noreci, "The S,iR is designed ro desensirize?" that is to disinhibir. all viewers.
--p-p--.----p--.--..--.
172
KINSEY C R I M E S & C O N Z Q U E N C E S
CHAPTER 7
l ' h c sr~lso~-!
ovcrload cuiminarcd on Sarurdav nighr in a mulrinirdia evenr c ~ l l r drhr F-koramn. . . i n the drirhess.. . images
of ili~manb .inss-and somrtinics even animals-engagin? in
e /cry conce;vabic s e s ~ acr.
d accompanied by wails. squeals,
nloans. sho! rs. .uid rhc firsr movement of rhe'Tcbaik~vsi,~
ioiin Con<erto. Some swsnreen sim~ilraneousmoving
picrures.. .. Over a psriod of several hours. there came a
nionlenr whrn riie four Images on [he wall were of a gay malr
ic>ilple.a srr ughr c o u p i ~ a, lesbian couple, and a besrial group.
The subjrcr: wrsr nude.. . . I felr myself beconling disorie!~red... waz she kissing a mail or a woman? I srruggled ro
.force rhe acr; 1 WAS ~wrchinginro rheir proper boxes.. . and
i13u 1 could 1'1 rzrnrnlbe~-which was which. Wasn'~I supposed
ro make [he. e discrimina[ions? I searched for ciuss. There were none. I 'began ro feel
~i ~comiorral~lr.
Soon I realizcd,rhar ro avoid verUgo and nausea I W O L I haw
~ ~
ro give up
\a
tllc arrempi :o ciiscrirninarc. and simpiy surrendzr ro ehz csperiencc.. . . The differences $0;
I\ lish lii-ch 1 .we bee11 xiincd. werc. nor on11 rri~ial.bur invisible. By the end.. . Inlothing
w : shockin;:.
~
. . [blur n o r h ~ n LVJS
s sacred either. Bur as I drovc home, I began ro grr 3
sl ghrly uneasy &ding. ir u-as almost as if I had been conned. .. by my own condlrioned
rcsponse of raking rhe motr liberared posirion.. . nkarever my deeper feelings.. . love had
m ~ bcen
t
menrioned a single rime during rhe entire weekend.
T h e $AT; has s r v e d as a critical tool t o reshape views o f h u m a n sexualir): T h e N e w R i o l c p
media, an orgy o f [lornographic couplings o n film a n d video, is regularly utilized i n academia to
restructure srudenrs inodest sexual attitudes i n t o t h e bizarre EClnseyan alrernative. To understand
h o w this v:orks, it is useful t o study the mechanics of the SAR i n desensitizing a n d disinhibiting rhe
h u m a n b s l i n t o alIc\v a shift i n pedagogical attitude a n d performance. T h e SAP, literally scars rhs
viewer's blain as i t circ~inwencs,short-circuirs, his o r h e r cognition a n d conscience. Xeuroscienrisr
Dr. G a r y ..,ynch s a y ; o f all high resonance stimuli: "Whar me're saying here is that a n event which
lasts half a second. r .irhin iive or ren minutes has produced a srructural change thar is i n s o m e \v;lys
as proi-;,ui-ci as rhc s .rui.curai changr. o n e sees in (brain) damage.'"@'
of "the healthy brain." The SAR is effecti.ive because all human brains obey wi lar neurol x j s a call "3
i:w of strengrh." Simply put, rhis means rhar novel, scar!: exciting srirnuli h o n rhe o u r s J e world are
proccsscd faster and with more force than non-threatening, pieasant srimuli. Neurochtmicai pathways in the brain are chemically imprinted by herero-and homo-erotic n x d i i srimuli; hence. they
fuse sex, violence, fear, and anxiety into one felt emotion. T h e SAR reprogra ns studzn~sin educarion, medicine. psycholos~, criminals srxolo,qv and so on? by reconfiguring t h i r neurochemistrytheir human "narurev-producin,o a cadre of educated leaders who are part of Kinseyan deviance.
T h e effect of television experiences. and orher modern media srimuii on th :deveiopi 1g brains of
children, is addressed convincin& by educational psychologist Dr. Jane Henl! in her bcok. Eizdnngred itlimk (l984).'"" The nc~~rochemical
impact of sexualized media, wl ether conimercial or
rducauve, upon children's nascent brains, minds, and memories, is producing a new brsed of children, hence a new breed of adults and a new type ofsociety.
In The Bmin ( I 9QLi.),'07Richard Resrak reported thar a visual image passes from the c yc through
the brain in three-ten~hsof a second. The brain is srrucrurally clianged and I-~emories:Ire created.
We literally "grow new brain"'" with each eqxrience, and we have 110 choice in rhe maxer: we are
designed ro believe what we see. W'hat sexologists and pornographers calI sex~iai"fanrasv" is sexual
realir)- to the human brain. Visual data are processed as memories and emotions. and as such they are
real!y neurochemicailv etched into the pathvcays of the brain as real.
O u r brain controls our bod)., as weil as our emotional and physical he: lrh, so "f.dse" visual
srimuii recorded as "reai" can change our vital signs (heart rate, perspiration, i ~tensifiedbreathing.
m.'i rhe same as "real" images. Neuropsy~holo~ist
Margaret Kemeny states:
[Alnyrime we feel anything...rhink anythin%...imaginea n ~ r h i nrherc
~ . is acrk ir)-in the
brain that 1s rahng place ... rhar can rhen lead KO a cascade of changes thar ham. an lmpacl
on healrh. ' "
O n e wonders how have days and nights of SAR films portraying a n d and or 11 sodomy bestiality
and sadistic sex (as weil as homosexual, heterosexual, group, child, and child-adulr coitus1 affected
and changed the brains of the medical professionals, psychologists. criminologists, educ:.tors, sociologists, ministers, and sex "experts" exposed?
---174
--
CHAPTER 7
Gro,ving our f the Lnsej- model, this sexology monopoly set standards in the field ofsrxoloy:
It annua I? grants he Alfred C. Kinsey Award for Excellence in Scientific Scudv. Operationall?. the
(
SSSS iar;:ely direct; and conuols who is, or is nor, recognized as a sexology professional. It influe~~ces
who is h.red, fired. 01. promoted within academia. In !989, homosexual advocate Kenneth Ceorgc
headed tach the S S S board of direcrors and rhe Gnivzrsiry of I'ennsylvania'~ Human Sexu.Jir>
Program
Tod;): studenis hoping ro advance in fieids dealing wirh issues relaced to human sexuaii? are
expecred to ackno~vled~e
agreemenr with Kinsefs scientjfic-variant view of sexuality, as taught i n
their schools. This for all practical purposes, has long eliminated from [he s e x ~ ~ afield
l i ~those ~ v h o
mighr imisr on manraining a virtuous. moral srandard of sexualiry.
Let us close ollr brief look ar rhe SSSS by noting that during ~ t s1987 AIDS conferenccx in
Atlanta, c;eorgia, i successfully jumped onto the AIDS gravy train, giving SSSS access ro copiou
AIDS prtvention ri:search funds. Sexology fundamentailv promotes all of the sexiial activirv said to
result in AIDS, including anal sodomy. For years their sexology films produced ar San Francisco's Sex
Institute .nodeled and promoted unprotected multiple hererosesual and homosexual sex acrs, inr:lusive of bcth sodom!es. Under the guise of ,UDS education, this profession has become even more
aggressive in modejing its varianr-seuualiry standard for our nation's schoolchildren. For exampie.
rhe late Dsryck Ca1,lenvood. a onetime SSSS president who headed New York Universiv's Schoo! of
Educatioi~Sexualiy, Department, creared a curriculum for middle-school children (subsequend?- a
film-strip and video) entitled, About Your Sex-rmli~-which graphicdiy glamorized unprorccred homosexual anti heterosexual anal sodomy As nored in the n'eu York 7i*zbuns, Calderwood. who died
young of .-\IDS, wa "a disKinseyan Professional Sexological
Societies & Accrediting Agents
ciple of srx pioneel Alfred
&nseY 10) believt:d,with
SSSS
)I / SSSS Board.
Society For the Scientif~c
Founders '
Kinsey, n 3 type of sexual
SlECUS Board, )
stu?y-?ISex
I .
Pomerov
Ellis
- .- .- ,, -.
..- , Beiael.
- -. =- ,
Founders
behavior is a b n o r n a l or
/ Guze, Lehfekn,Benjamin,
George, Money,
Pomeroy, Calderwood,
Bulbugh,R e j i , Shetwirl,
pathological."
Kirkendall, Gagnon,
Green, Davls, Schaefer
Money, Reiss, Masters
SIECUS
Coleman, Tietze, Amelar,
& Johnson, Bell,
(Sex Information & Education
Anork er accredi :ing orLippes, Hartman,
Council of the United States)
Marmor, Rubin,
Lopiccolo, Mosher, Storr
Christenson, etc.
ganizatior!, the Anmican
Bvme. Schwark
Socierv of' Sex Educators, ,
1
Sex Education
Counselors and Th(:rapists Human Sexuality
on Accreditation
Curricula
(ASSECT', was iorlned in
Wardell ~omeroy
Wardell Pomeroy
Deryck Calderwood
Deryck Caldewood
1967 b), D s . Phyllis :;chiller
Paul Gebhard
Robert Mcllvenna
Kenneth George
Mary Calderone
and Aibeir Ellis. A! SECT
"ern ~ u ~ i o u g h
j Lester Kirkendall
has also long uri1iz:d the
SAR technique as a desenASSECT applies the Kinsey Model as members serve the general
sitizing ec.ucariOna r O o i
~ublic
throush outreach asencier like Planned Parenthood.
e n k i n g s c h o o ~ ~ o mcourtrooms,
s,
etc.
Dr. Ellis ssrved on rht board
of Penthouie Fol-zrm. Both
[he SSSS a n d AS:;ECT
1942
isanger 6 caldaronel
joined together ro sjjonsor
American Assoc.
the 1998 i'TX/~dd
P0r lograAmerican Society
ASSECT
for Sex Educators,
of Marriage & Family
Counselors 8 Therapis!
phy Confc.renceX h.ld at
1967
Counselors
a
-.
--
-- - - - .-
--
------ -- - -
- - -- -175
P~zedop/7iiitz.
Kinse);s data laid the groundwork for
h e academic pornography produced by
gynecolo~isrWiiliarn blasters who iefi his
wife to
Virginia Johnson. By 1957, ucilirarian research on orgasms 1r.a.s t eins pubiicl!; advocared b!, the Lnseyire first couple of sex rherapY (now divorced) at TS(5shington J n i ~ ~ r n i nMedical
's
School. The Masrers 8r Johnson studies fell into disfavor r'oliov,-ing a spousd 131nuir which publicly
cspossd their use of rher~peuricprosdru~es(called "sex s~irrogares"by sexoloeisrs).
I11 [he 19SOs, rhe h4asters and Johnson, Plallboy Foundation granr recipirnrs, appeared in Plav60y
.
ro sevcal rheir finding that "some" women (seven anonymous female subjecrs idt:ntified e1:;etvhereas
probabiy prostitutes) enjoy anal sodomy (the key known source for AIDS). Man Pltz~i70~~
<.onsumers
arho undoubtedly read this as an oral and anal sodomy endorsement, would hme been ingr); and
resenrful ar wives or
who did not respond " p r o p e r l ~to rhc dangerous. painful and historically unnatural act as "love."
SIECUS
In 1964, the Sex Informarion and Education Council of the Unired Smes (SIEC J S ) was launched at
the Kinsey Instirure. Ics objective was ro reach Kinseyan ideolog!, ;is sex education in o1.r schools.
SIECUS (which now calls itself [he Sexualizy Information and Educarion Co.inci1 of r l e United
Stares) imprinted tile new Kinsey variant standard on almosr all ses education curricula Its carl!.
leader. Dr. Mary Calderone (past medical direcror of Planned Parenthood) \?:a; the dime link bcw r e n Kinscfs university-based research. Planncd Parznthood's grassroots out1 tach. and SIECUS.
SIECUS was a "Resource Center {operatind Specialized Programs to Disrriburi. Informal ion about
Human sesualiry [through] learned journals. research studies, rraining materials for health professionals and sample classroom curricula.""'
--
--
--
CHAPTER 7
T
P
Not a sexologist?
No, he never considered himself a sexologist. I'm the
sexologist.
T
P
In what way?
Weil, for instance at a cocktail party we were both
attending, somebody asked Kinsey if some sexual histories were more difficult to take than others. Kinsey said
'No'. I was furious! But we had an agreement never to
argue or disagree in public. But wheh I got him alone I
said 'ProK why did you say that? You know it's not true'.
(ProK was his nickname, a contraction of Professor
Kinsey).
T
.
T
P
T
P
--
NEW
NO. OF
AGE
AGE
ORGASMS
5 mon.
11 mon.
11 moo.
1 hr.
3s nin.
9 min.
65 min.
2 min.
5 min.
10 hr.
24 hr.
2 yr.
2+yr.
4 yr.
4
yr.
4 yr.
7 yr.
8 yr.
9 yr*
10 yr.
10 )T.
NO. OF
ORGASMS
I 1 yr.
1 l yr.
12 yr.
12 yr.
12 yr.
12 yr.
13 yr.
2 hr.
2 hr.
1 hr.
24 min.
2.)hr.
8 hr.
70 scc.
3 hr.
13 yr.
13 yr.
2 hr.
68 min.
13 yr.
s hr.
14 yr.
21 hr.
4 hr.
52 min.
I
I hr.
1 hr.
3 hr.
3 min.
24 hr.
P r d n Bill
Auerut. ZOO0
T H E lNSnRlTE
FOR ADVANCED STUDY
OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
Apr l 2 5 , 1979
Friday,
-
July 6 , 10 a.m.
norday,
Ser sory
J u l y 9 , 10 a.m.
.ow A w l r u u u
Smr
11
to 6 P.m.
W u u r e s m Xa8ugr I1
---Wetnosday.
Sei
I
I
Sa--day,
-
to 6 p.m.*
Eh&n
The SAR
(Sexual
Attitude
Restructuring)
is the
foundation of
the sex
education here
and elsewhere.
The SAR is a
series of
"sexual
orientation"
films (largely
"hard-core"
pornography)
designed t o
radically
restructure the
student's
moral values.
Left are some
of the credit
courses for
these "sexual
orientation"
experts: 9 days
of "Sensory
Awareness
Massage,
Erotic
Massage," etc.,
for 3 units of
college credit,
(bring your
own towel and
oil).
25
Aupruf 2000
ANALYSIS O F T H E KINSEY
REPORTS
I Unit
Wardell B..Pomeroy d t c u s s u
m t h e H m a n M a k (1948) and -1
#79I
--
ths H
s
-
a n (1953) chapter b y
chapter, summarizing and explaining the dataM a l e and female clam are compared in terms
of age. educational level. age aF puberty. pre-
IQL x n
ences.
#SO1
-- 1 Unit
26
6
8
10
Attachment 6:
Dr. Wardell Pomeroy,
Kinsey Co-Author, Sex Partner,
Directs
IASHS "Course Work"
Administrative Staff
tosis E. I)rahun,Ed.D.,M.Th..mafStudarts
Lontb Hadan, Ph.l).Y.A., Dean of Rofessiorul
Em
L p . w..
Rqwtm
Pfuidmt
'"ik& Mclhe-.
h.D.,M.Div..
Medu
Lcss than a we& afkx Wclls's strong statement hit rhc press, the Indiana hvincial Caundl of Catholic Women asked him to dvify his position. "Inthe name ofmorc than 150,000 women-rnost ofthem mothcrs,
..
..
6
7
10
Attachment 7:
A "Conflict of Interest. "
Sexology Takes Money From
Pornographers
1
1
-VS-
NOS.
1
1
80-Mi-1582
80-M-1332
80-M-1266
80-M-1350
80-M-1351
80-M-1267
D F r e c t mmfnation
mws mamifiaCion
---------------
---------------------L-
755
801
JAR
wit3 tha
Cpbc*s*oq
is bf s
miit
SsnPrsncf sco
A3mt
b yoor
four and a h 1 P p a r s .
capacity b e i n g n f i f i a t s d
mcalf
~ a ~ t t c i p a nor
t attending the bdutt
a;ttmdirzg,
&.
Yes. f
Qwq
PO,
wohr
f t was in California?
Yes.
it was
F S Za~s o c i e t 5 a ~annual
-04
Paumq
lww
in LosAngehs.
05/29/02
JAR
w ~ h t
M a t types oe rcttviries?
(7
~$wf@s,
sewaf ly explicit
Ammy
M O W ~ ~i E
S
yau w i l l ?
No, my posktLtm
is t h a t ur ham rt,
be.
tbw W
tcstifyhg
7J
05/29/02.
8167972544
JAR
T t o c u l l baing in Clevrlaiwl, y e s .
INTERNATIONAL EDITORS
CHILDREN,
SEX AND
SOCIETY
B
Y
~
~
J
M
Ta sonbury Rwrprvchwd tht rightJ
of Dr. Hukrlr uxl tbr NatioarlSu,Pe
rum and p u W tk SIpC AUQl in 1977.
TbtbXt~~ll~iPnp.llpbobPqnphr
ofKoIlymdBMQar&ubbpy,pbom
-of
B n w b a drl.narmrl) phew
prpbroftb.trocbi]dr,n~.
'
1
A l r o i n l ~ , t & N ~ & P w ~ r a
8 bodt -tit)rd'MUIG@qfS*nditn~hicbaoot.i#dI
nu& pbobgrrph oi Rdrkbwm aad tbr
tromimn. Prhrtopub)iarion.So#oa
m@t
.pd wuI.d ~
' pvrmL
I#bpblibtbrphom,.Itbaryhh
dridPlaorp~ulro*ru~lr~ofthr
prticPLOboQ~pLMdtoow.Ahr.
~
o
i
~
fmmd tbB &I-, 8 wtb&t raiaLtrt
3ia-i-
oildJI.-*-
of1
6
8
10
Attachment 8:
Sexologists A s Pornographers
N\ediwion\
"
.
I
THE FOLLOWING TWO PHOTOGRAPHS OCCUPY FULL PAGES IN THE BOOK. THEY ARE
INCLUDED AS EVIDENCE OF FORCED 'ORGIASTIC" FACULTY- STUDENT
RELATIONSHIPS, INDOCTRINATING OR PRE-SELECTING ORGIASTIC TEACHERS AND
DOCTORS OF SEXOLOGY WORLDWIDE. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE REDACTED AND
REDUCED TO LIMIT THE COARSENING 'SAW IMPACT OF EXPOSURE.
Photo #1: Mrs. Faloona, a secretary at The Institute For Advanced Studv of
IT?-]
The mother sued IASHS in Faloona v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., No. CA 3-79-0056-R. US
States District Court, (5th Cir. 1986) and lost the case to a judge who said the
photograhs of nude children opening their genitalia to the camera did not constitute
child pornography (now illegal, based on the US Supreme Court ruling in Ferber), and,
ruled the trial judge, the photos were properly bought and hence
properly sold. The photo has been redacted from the explicit original to
limit viewer coarsening while proving the mass IASHS sexual
dysfunction, criminality, including that of pedophila.
Certiticate Programs
Page 1 of 1
Judith A. Reisman
Subject: FW: Certificate Programs
Certificate Programs:
For the 3 1st year, the Institute will hold the exciting and innovative 7 - day Sexual Attitude
Restructuring (SAR) Program. The SAR is an intense learning event designed for people who are
working in the field of sexology or who wish to better understand their own sexuality and that of others.
It is a program dedicated to fulfilling the need for training in human sexuality and incorporating
instruction in safe sex practices. SAR provides expert and practical information, skills and tools of
value to everyone. Didactic and experiential, SAR offers each person the information, training and
skills necessary for more competent, sensitive and healthy personal and professional functioning.
SAR will present information on a broad range of sexual topics through lectures, small and large group
discussions, visual media, and exercises. Topics will include childhood sexuality, disability,
homosexuality, sex and aging, and transsexuality.
The fee for the SAR is $725 per person, $1,305 for couples, and carries 60 CE hours or four units of
graduate credit.
Go to Registration Form
MICHAEL
1). FARRIS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
HSLD.4 Building
P.O. Bm 159
can Betsante
father.
1 had known of rvl "omeroy for years'because of his involvement in a number
'\is inclu:!ed his testimony on behalf of a pornography ..- .
of issues I bad followed.
distriburor in my home town, S,,okanc, Wdhington. His testimony w u that pornography
was healthy and helpful to develop peop\cls sexuality. \This can be verrfted by Ihc
Spokane County Prosecuting At torney, Donald Bmckett. (509)456-3662.]
Upon arriving at his office, 1 saw mar this view was not something he believed in
an abstract or academic manner. When I walked into his store-front officc tha first thing
I noticed was a number of hard core, X-rated videos which were being offered for sale
or rent. (He told me during the deposition that this aspect of his operalion was not
parrlculariy successful and was being closeti.) .
In his personal officc all four walls !were slacked floor to ceiling with books and
hundred) were obscene pornography.
magazines. A great number of these (S~VCTRI
Playboy and Hustler looked like Reader's Digest by way of comparison.
Dr. Pameroy told me that he believtd that (cvcrything else being equal) that he
would also prefer a homosexual to be chosen the custodjnl parent rather than a
Christian. t"nc reason being that the hdmosexual would better help the child with
"healthy" sexual adjustment. He also told me that he would no1 counsel one of his
patients who w u havin sex with a minoi to stop. but would ask them why they felt
guilty about such activit w.
I hope this is helpful to you to set khc record straight about Wardell ~omcrcy.
6
8
10
Attachment 9:
Church Still Listening to
'Sexperts"
..
children
chosen by
promise
how the
Page 1 of 2
WASHINGTON
(June 10,2002) - Media briefings on sexual abuse issues will be part of
the Dallas meeting of the U.S. Bishops.
One briefing, on canon law issues, will take place June 12, at 8 p.m.
Four others will take place the afternoon of June 13, and address the psychological aspects
of sexual abuse, the response to victims, the financial structures and prevention programs.
Presenters on canon law include Archbishop John Myers of Newark and Bishop Joseph
Galante, canon lawyers and members of the bishops' Ad Hoc Committee on Sexual Abuse,
and Father John Renkin, of the Diocese of Springfield, Illinois, and a consultant to the ad
hoc committee.
The bishops' meeting also will include presentations for media on related questions on the
psychological aspects of sexual abuse, the response to victims, the "Catholic dollar," and
prevention programs.
Presenters on the Psychological Aspects of Sexual Abuse include Fred Berlin, MD, Ph.D.;
Father Stephen Rossetti, Ph.D.; president and CEO of the St. Luke Institute, a treatment
center in Silver Spring, Maryland, and Conventual Franciscan Father Canice Connors,
president of the Conference of Major Superiors of Men, former president and CEO of the
St. Luke Institute and former director of Southdown Treatment Center in Ontario, Canada.
Presenters on the Response to Victims include Michael Bland, Psy.D., D. Min., ClinicalPastoral Coordinator for the OEce of Assistance Ministry, Archdiocese of Chicago; and
Phyllis Willerscheidt, coordinator of efforts for pastoral outreach to victims of clergy sexual
abuse, Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.
Presenters on the "Catholic dollar" include Philip Ries, director of finance, Diocese of
Orange in California; Kevin Heffeman, chief financial officer, Diocese of Burlington,
Vermont, and Deacon John Benware, chief financial officer, Diocese of Savannah, Georgia.
Presenters on Prevention include Michael Bemi, president and CEO of the National
Catholic Risk Retention Groups, and Dominican Sister Glenn Anne McPhee, USCCB
Secretary for Education, and Father Edward Bums, director of the USCCB Secretariat for
Vocations and Priestly Formation.
Office of Communications
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
321 1 4th Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20017-1 194 (202) 541-3000
Page 2 of 2
6
8
10
Attachment 10:
Berlin-Money
and
Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders
COURSE DESCRIPTIOS
HISTORY
FACULTY
PROGRAM
Johns Hopkins
Medical Institutions
Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences
~ n d
The Cycle of
Sexual Trauma:
,..,
.b-
.'
Vi
~ r e a t i the
~ i ~Victim and
Treating the Offender
COURSE OBJECTIVES
U p n co.mpletian d Ihir program the portcipant d l he
r t l c to :tiwuss:
Tllc slepl of lhc rvslualiun proces
T h ~ o r i e sofrhe etlalogy olsexurrl d i s o ~ d c ~ ps r r p h i l i r r :
' @prOpri&te rrtiunuler for t1Camcrl
Blleclivr 1rtat:r.rcI muddilies
'Chc useof plcrhyr~nographyh d h g n o s i r and lrcatrnenl
9 ~ t r c n tr e m r c h In t h t arcd el wxual d ~ w r d i ' r s
Th? Interhce of th? ,crioilnnl
lustice
,
. . . and menlsi
. . . . Ilcslth
Frlday. Febru
8.w
9 IT
iO X
10 J t
9 f l ? 6.
- 10 30 ~
I P r 5 t.
- I ? Oil nw
.
.
~GICIIIS
Saturday. Fc
8 W
8@
8.
9 ul - 9.45 r.
9.45 10 &
r'
IU 31 - 1Z.M no
.llulpnug u u m r q~ )
ul u o ( ~ ~ n c p101
u e q l u u u u l l u u l l ~ j u u2 ~n d Y u l q a r r q d
ruo!;n.lllh[
,w~!prjy i w + , 9 6 ~wlp! sy; r.: uqrjnron'
qi;?qs L c j ! : r d ~ " , , m >,'y~,~%i
6 ,I{!,t',,S
p,w ,dlq",.eA9
' l ! S U C lii3!Cil~LID3 'uI''! (X.:E i ( 11U.3 U!-.(UqD
'IUqlYH JEU:I] I.illOlU!JP(i jI> 5UZ!l3P:llR ~ U I I ~ Y . ~(USU: 247
uroq I.n.9.e RLw p ~ 8
'~YITI
F U K ~ UX! P~U ! S ~ jo
,bw.inn] e h p a ~
u ca a ~ q ! s w x sI.lla?i!p s! p r q y 3 .
. r . m p ~ ~ s ~ q l r! qu& w , p i l > ) i ; t h n .A!~sJ,;u!
21:. ju I A = U ~
' l ; ~ q A n x ~ ~ f ~ > ! ~. ,y~wx:.w[ lp~mt >j j ni;-~nc?j
w s,nJpnis
.rdLJ
51 %'>!y10<
U(II~,.
m1.f~
IUIV:
ro: .un m:d
.,"",,..
.,.,
.. *.*....,.-,--:4
.a,,
<L,,
7i)~li: p u ~ . < ; ~ q qx o ~ : ! ~ l e ~
IWS 11r1d I w a tx
~.~;:l.!'*'^
I*
' "
Sd
..;,."".,.
'I~URn4!l#U( loJJ-SlOU$ 0 $1 N I ~ ~ U H
ruqor .;!rpd
aq1 01 qc?p,.m #>u a>. Su!pl!ng aaum,,
XI' 01 r*:IJmr.u;
!?Kay,' r S 3 1 d ~pu8l)r.q a47 11 PiJop.4 c!
P . q ~ s :p
l d d o q n r '~p i ! d m ~%!s,dry cutpi t w a r [ p a11101
'I.!H i;W .(lyall) luJq salnl:iUI $1 h a . M o:qalls*I aqnruc
21411qS i p t l l ( ;>lnpt[X ,h.#tq,t!!~ OF10 a[ ;l>!l& .WX&ud
r.AVop)i[: 10 ~ ~ J LO:Ii oI ! ~ d~ ~ n t q ; i m ( . a n o p am
golquu!Sy
rmu Su!~:nd a111 c i 11111;~ [pk same JU!I .JCISI:SIYS~
a n w xi: o; ~ c ! ~mcq
d
: ~ e q a u o% l l l u ! h q ' p p d atu!l
Ihill.ii)~lJ~
0 l o l Ru:.cl!ng.Ji:t~r.ly~
c t . < l s ~ ! pp q q m ~ daq
{I!"
s ~ u d p u t ~r : qi tuo&el~&ilrcc~) ap;oqs 3 ~ p a
3: d ! s j ~
'JJ!lDI1 III'j;LliUIJX2
q)!.+ ~~JP,.IIO, 26 Jpi
NOPnI!(ICI
In,:Pp:
r q d d o " suqcf a111O
; dotu 0 p l w ;pm pan 1
~
I.-. *...,
..-......
-.- ..,..,,
.,' ..
....,,-.-..- ..I-..
-ar
-...-......=.....-I
-.(,--.2..,-..:.,--I.."~YU
......-. ,...-,*
...-...
.r
11
13
14
15
Attachment 11:
Sexperts Excuse
Pedophilia and Pederasty
AS
NATURE
MADE HIM
=
~ o n v k c e dthat embargoes
Sea: Education
40
C/
THE
KINSEY
INSTITUTE
NEW REPORT
ON SEX
What You Must Know
t o be Sexuallu Literate
JUNE M. REINISCH, Ph.D.
DIRECTOR
with RUTH BEASLEY, M.L.S.
Edited and compiled by
DEBRA KENT
ST. MARTIN'SPRESS
NEW YORK
JUNE R E I N I S C H CONNECTION
6.
THE SEXU Z
Readiness fc :
Sexual respons
Involuntary se
Sexual fanta r
Masturbatio. _
November 1991
CAMPU:
Berendzen
1
Continned from p g e
3 '
A severe penalty by
the law and American
University could have
sent a s i . 1 to people
like Mx Berendzen
thut there will be a
price to pay for
terrorizing people.
Len that just weeks after examination at Johns Hopkins, Mr. Berendzen's psychiatrists said he no
longer had a problem, and his prognosis was "excellent.""I couldn't believe it," she said. "After a few weeks,
they wave a wand and say he's
crlred."
Studies by psychiatrists themselves show noability to predict with
even strong probability, much less
with certainty, whether such behavior will recur: moreover, it is oFten
.,
DEPARWENT OF PS KHIATRY
and
May 1 6 , 1 9 9 0
RE:
~ i c h a r dB e r e n d z e n , Ph.D.,
University.
f o r m e r p r e s i d e n t o f The
American
The f o l l o w i n g s t a t e m e n t i s b e i n g i s s u e d b y a u t h o r i t y o f P a u l R .
McHugh,
M . D 8 , Chairman, Department of p s y c h i a t r y and
Behavioral
S c i e n c e s , The J o h n s H o p k i n s U n i v e r s i t y S c h o o l o f M e d i c i n e ,
The
J o h n s ~ o p k i n sH o s p i t a l .
I t r e p r e s e n t s t h e f i n d i n g s and conclus i o n s of The J o h n s Hopkins c l i n i c a l s t a f f r e s p o n s i b l e f o r e v a l u a t i n g and t r e a t i n g t h e above noted p a t i e n t .
The s t a f f
consists
o f o v e r 20 p ~ . o f e s s i o n a l s .
1. I n t r o d u c t i o n
Dr.
~ i c h a r d B e r e n ' d z e n was e v a l u a t e d a n d t r e a t e d on a n
i n p a t i e n t b e s i s a t The J o h n s H o p k i n s H o s p i t a l b e t w e e n A p r i l 1 0 ,
1 9 9 0 a n d May 4 , 1 9 9 0 .
S e l f - r e f e r r e d , h e was p r e s c r e e n e d f o r
a d m i s s i o n t h r o u g h The J o h n s H o p k i n s S e x u a l D i s o r d e r s C l i n i c o n e
A thorough evalud a y p r i ~ rt o i n i t i a t i o n of h i s i n p a t i e n t s t a y .
ation
d a s r e q u i r e d f o r two p u r p o s e s :
(1) h e h a d ,
f o r reasons
t h a t w e r e i n i t i a l l y u n c l e a r , a l l e g e d l y made p h o n e c a l l s i n w h i c h
t h e theme c e n t e r e d around t h e i s s u e o f c h i l d s e x u a l a b u s e .
These
a b e r r a n , : a c t s seemed o u t of c h a r a c t e r w i t h o t h e r a s p e c t s of h i s
life,
and h? i n d i c a t e d a s t r o n g d e s i r e t o u n d e r s t a n d
h i s own
actions,,
(21
T h e s e a c t s h a d t o some e x t e n t b e c o m e a m a t t e r o f
public recorii, posing a s e r i o u s t h r e a t t o h i s f a m i l y ' s privacy
and s e n s e of
b e i n g , t o h i s academic and p r o f e s s i o n a l c a r e e r ,
and t o h i s p e r s o n a l r e p u t a t i o n .
This, i n turn, resulted
in a
s t a t e of
selrere mental anguish w i t h f e e l i n g s of hopelessness,
a b a n d o m l e n t , i ~ n dd e s p a i r ,
l ~ e l l
Diff e r e n t : . a l ~ i a g n o s i s
A m a j o r 1 ) u r p o s e o f Dr. B e r e n d z e n ' s i n p a t i e n t e v a l u a t i o n
was
t o d e t e r m i n e w h a t h a d m o t i v a t e d h i m t o make t h e p h o n e c a l l s i n
I t was e s p e c i a l l y i m p o r t a n t t o a s c e r t a i n w h e t h e r
they
question.
were a m a n i f e s t a t i o n o f p s y c h i a t r i c c o n f l i c t a n d i m p a i r m e n t ,
or,
i n s t e a d , r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of s e l f - c e n t e r e d misconduct.
Because t h e
c a l l s had c e n t e r e d around c h i l d h o o d s e x u a l abuse, a more p a r t i c u -
(e)
*He seems to have suppressed and controlled the confusion from this abuse
until his father's death triggered old pain.
*He did not place the calls for prurient interests; rather, in a confused way, he
was seeking answers t o unresolved issues related to his own abuse.
*Finally, his prognosis, now that he understands how t o deal with these-issues is
excellent.
We recommend continued outpatient counseling to help him reestablish a
satisfying and productive life, a goal he undoubtedly will accomplish, in our
judgment.
Pedophilia Steps
Into the Daylight
Leading sex researchers and educators are touting the "benefit
ofadult-child sex and are callingfor more studies to prove it.
by Michnel Ebert
W
this can be a
loving and
thoughtful,
responsible
sexual
activity."
-Wardell Pomeroy,
sex researcher and
author.
pomeroi
5
~
7
.
1
-.. .
tbfdry S. Cald?rme, M.D.. co'mnder and i3rnei pies~denlo:
SIECUS
tional sexual
relationship
could be and
should be
character
building.''
-Wayne Dynes,
Hunter College
professor and
Paidika editorial
board member.
- ..-...-:1
I
--- 1 1
11
x'
-.--.
--..-..----..
kZr-%; 1
I
1
.Ioua%n-l
*.
n
~
wood,
irke end all and Pomeroy
have all been closely associated
with SIECUS. & outlined
above, all have also supported a
more liberal view of
adult-fhild sex in one
way or another.
Cilizen contacted
SIECUS by phone
and in writing to
request an intenriew
wlth Debra Haffner,
organization's
the
executi.ve director.
Haffner stated in
writing that "SIECUS
opposes all sexual
interactions that are
not
consensual.
Adult-child
sexual
relationships are, by definition, exploitative and nonconsensual.
Adult-child
sexual contact is unaccept-
.,
Locninvar-Huntinton
53788,
f(inseq's Role
Pro-family researcher Judith Reism
traces the origins of the child sexuality moment to Alfred C. Kinsey, ,fhD., whose worl
the basis for much of sex education today. Rc
man points out that Kinsey used data from ad
males who had contact with 196 preadolex
boys ranging in age from two months to 15yea
Kinsey used the daDl,to ddim that bc
regardless of their age, are sekual beiigs capa
of arousal. He argued t h ~children
t
could ben
from adult contacts.
"There are cases of infants under a yea
age who have learned the advantage of spec
manipulation, sometimes as a result of being
manipulated by older pemns," K i w y wrot
The pedophilia movement also owes m
to homosexual rights activists.
"You cannot have a society accept men t
ing sex with boys unless you have them act
homosexuality first," Reisman said.
NAMBLA is a regular participant in ho
sexual marches. NAMBLA is the leadinrr Un
States organization pushing for acce$anc
man-bov sexual relationshios. Internation.
the pedophile Information ~ ; c c h a n (PIE)
~e c
nizes efforts and distributes information or.
topic.
NAMBLA's phone message tells boys,
not despair. Be true to your feelings. Times
change and your oppression will end."
As with homosexuality, pedophilia a,
cates are attempting to legitimize their bcha
by publishing research in professional jourr.
"That's exactly what they're doing,"
DeCecco of San Francisco State, who edit:
Joun~alof Homosexuality. "In a democracy,
form a group of like-minded people, and yo
to put your case across to the public."
Paidika: 7ke lourn1 of Pacdophilia (Euro
spelling), published in The Netherlands, pu
an academic face, but underneath, its object:
similar to NAMBLA's. The journal says its
pose is "to demonstrate that paedophilir.
been, and remains, a legitimate and produ
part of the totality of human experien~
Paidika often contains advertisements tor K
BLA and other pedophile organizations.
Reliable research or not, pedophilia ;
cates are marching forward with their vcrsi
social engineering.
"When the gay rights activists bcgan i
politically active, there wasn't a sufficient
of scientific information for them to base
gay rights activism on," John Money told PC
"You don't have to have a basic body ot'scic
information in order to decide to work ac:
for a particular ideology, as long as ~ o u ' r r
pared to be put in jail. Isn't that how
change has always taken place, re ally?"^^ 1
11
12
13
14
15
Attachment 12:
Peterson's Sexpert
John Money Advocates
Pederasty/ Pedophilia
CONTENTS
'
--
,/
rriahhip?
They have to know the possible outcomes.
There has to be awareness of risks and ponibilitia to consent properly. Engaged coupla can
know that there's a 50% chance of e n b g up in
divorcc, and they're w d h g to take that chance.
I don't know any better w a y of d e w a consenting relationsfup.
But you asked how dl ttus relates to
pedophilia, so let me try to get back to that.
Before the law was passed in Maryhd that
now obliges me to report every suspiaon or
accusation of a paedophilic relationship, I was
able to work in a t o d y Werent way with
people who came to me with a complaint about
themselves as paedophiies. I'll restrict myself to
discwing men who had boyfriends. I'm also
t a k q about people who w e n self-rcfied,
and not people who were rdemed under p m sure or under legal coercion. I always would say
to them, well, I want to be able to talk to your
boyfriend. And if the situation rully permitted
it, t would want to talk to the boy's parents, be-
sabra a t ~ o l o g i c l meedngs.
l
but I don't get
very h.There
not very &y sexologis&r
sex therapists or sex educators, when you put the
whole bunch of ur together. Out of that small
numbcr there's an even smaller number who are
convinced ofthe importance of establishingtheir
scientific right to do research. Otherwise there
would bc a lobby in Waslungton. My favorite
saying about this is: Wherever the herrings are
running, the gulls are overhead. When it becomes possible. as now in the U.S.,to make
money by specializing in the treatment of chdd
abuse, with absolutely no scientific basis to anything that you're doing, then you'll find a lot of
people malung a lot of money. It's where your
paycheck is that dictates a lot of people's activities: that is, whether they will be sex reformists or
sex researchers. A dismal situation, isn't it?
There is a d t f f i m e f i o m country to country in the
childhood sexuality hystnia that's &en going on in
the last several yean, betwen the United States and
England, for &le, and the Netherlands. Hnr
there's a much more rational diccussion and wen a re... ..-liberalization
.. ..-..
ofthe Lzy. Then is still scxolok~l
cent
researrh going on into child sexuality, and there is the
presence of mmy paedophile work groups. What
would you see as the reason why the hysteria has been
so i n t m c in the United Stater, which is where you
live?
now that I am retired. I don't treat anybody anymore, so I'm spcJung generically. I also decided
-dingpaedophiIia
that I w d d never report
anvbody, so I simply would not even ay to treat a
paedophile, because the very fin that they come
and ask for treatment maka them rcpormblc.
Do p m o in
~ penal institutions rrally have a doice?
d e or female body. and therefore still be defined as a &Id. That blurs the ability to idenrify
what is or is not a child in an image and makes a
lot more m a t e d prosecutable.
J
I certainiy think that's where we have to begin. r /
So you would attack the whok baiufrom which ogcqf-consent laws are consmuted, in other words.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The starting point of Paidika is necessarily our consciousness of ourselves as paedophiles. It is our intention to publish
an intellectual journal which will examine paedvphilia within
its cultural context, with emphasis on the humanities, history
and social sciences. W e shall be speaking, therefore, not only
to pacdophiles seeking a greater understanding of their identity, but also to members of the academic community open to
objective investigations of the phenomenon.
The ground on which we stand is the emergence and evolution of paedophile consciousness and identity in history. W e
point back to the writings of J. A. Symonds and members of
the early German sexual emancipation movement such as
Benedict Friedlander and John Henry Mackay, where views
of paedophilia as an identity and subculture were proposed.
The contemporary development of this consciousncss is found
in the work of Frits Bernard, Edward Brongersma, Tom
O'Carroll, RenE Schirer and others. We intend to be a forum
for the shaping of this consciousness.
But to speak today of paedophilia, which we understand to
1990
Excerpt :
Evolutionary Bisexuality
Any theory of the genesis of either exclusive homosexuality or exclusive
heterosexuality must address primarily the genesis of bisexuality.
Monosexuality whether homosexual or heterosexual, is secclndag and a
derivative of the primary bisexual or ambisexual potential. Ambisexuality
has its origins in evolutionary biology and in the e&&olcgy of sexual
differentiation.
John Money PhD. Johns Hopkins U . , Baltimore MD Tel. (301) 955 3740
June Machover R e i n i s c h , PhD, D i r e c t o r , Kinsey I n s t i t u t e f o r Research
i n Sex Gender and Reproduction, Bloomington* Indiana Tel. (812) 335-7689
11
13
14
15
Attachment 13:
Peterson's Sexpert
Fred Berlin is
"Shielding Child Molesters"
Dr. Berlin see ks--as an expert mental health professional-to permit on-going, active child rapists in his "treatment" their liberty.
Our saav
Stop shielding
Founded If27
Now I n O u r 2 G l w r Ir'cnr
SSP
lkCi
m irrers dl).
b r . fierlin an4 o(hrr8;
~l~er+
4 te m n r k s i e r s . Verv 1.r
06/01/02
JAR
Dr. Berlin seeks--as an expert mental health professional-to permit on-going, active child rapists in his "treatment" their liberty.
Our
say
Stop shielding
chiZd mozesters
Founded 1727
N o w * I n O u r 2 6 l s r t'cnr
i
3
-noat are m r d w e 4 0
e w r * ~ .So-8
wy*haaWst~
xas uo"
t
p
c
..
m
-
JUH-22-82
83:53
PM
FIRST
PRINCIPLES
-.....-
qucslinns nl.~utrtrtsiclivisn~.
rnorc likely 1c1h : ~ nllo
!
wily nkcrad
agency's ptngtn~~!.
"Nor rvrrylxidy is Ihc ssmc riskAflcr an .vnr:t~y o f 7K ytarc, 11 1rcn.n~crsi w ~ dto knvc b c k r k n w n
N u l cvcryho'dy ,is I l l c sewc scvcril
l o r e c l ~ul f unlraalntl offcodors llud virtima. Tlicy rcpvrlcd lower scxual
u l u l k ~ ~ d c r snrd
, " I.nui5viltc
'lta8 bean rrarrclilcJ on n sax charge, drivc a ~ t a
d r h i ~ ~ cnl:q!ing
wl
i~fewogisf I k n n i s Wlipncr, wtm s a t ' Illc c o ~ r l p i ~ ~Willr
~ v dIH pcrcanl n l Il111sc cr olhl!(' dcvinrrt I~cl~;iviors.such as
mnjorily hf his rlrhl-ntolcblcr clicrrls w l ~ oh;bd cu~nplclt!tlI l ~ cI r w l r l l c ~ ~ l vv
, ~ l t r l , nor
~ cxl~il~iliunis~r~.
arc nnt pcdopWs.
Thc 2000 nludy n t 259 KFI)IIICLY V:X
7&. University u1T~,ntnlo TI
Wngncr, u'llo IIJS ltcat~!clr!vt!rd olrortdars was dat~eby sslalc CcrnCC-, chialrisls reporlcd ,n n study
pried scx nrlarrdcrs during tltc past liatrs Ucputinicnl psychologisl Jon clctics
m i r i l y C~~(lrolics lhal
IS gcnrs, snid nll tlic liricsls 11c Iras UurnCh.
- tlwy cchit~iledlcss nn!isoc.ial Irchavconnsclcd I~inv!r e q r c r ~ ~ J ~
trt! tIrt:slt
~~
Canr s inr llrntr lyplrnl scx o r f e n d w ~ ,
Stutlias nl cltild r r t o l ~ ~ lill
t t ~ c ~ Ii l c. tIcc:tir~c:Jlo Jiscus~tho spc- ndir i o u ~ ~
H. Karl 111oupl171 ~C~CCIII u ~ r sexually
c
dcs id~ l ~ i l u
rcsulls.
r
crlics of arly CRSP.
Ilnn~utt,;I senior rcscnrch nlfiear vianl. tni~inlyp ~ d q 1 0 i I ~ a .
"My cxl~r:ric:ncc i s thal nrnny pco- with !flu C;I~i;~dic~n
Dcparfmcnlnfthc
Wagner, the h u i s v i l l c 11syc1iolr1very u.cll l o l r c a l ~ r i ~ nSl ~ ~ l i u lGctlcrdl
11le r r r l ~ m d
ur
whn has sludlad m,sail1 Or*! rvilh sumc pricslo, W
'G
I
:t,,td J c v c l q ~irrsigl~lsoboul Ihcmcidiviwl, sirid ti~ulcdur:i whn liuvc f%crissue lios l o do wltlr scoliicafv
sclvcs nnrl llloir lwtiavlor and learn irnrelnwd III~IC
VJCI~IIS
Ot~dw11t) I~RYC
1r;i;ning nnd tlrc nllitudc toward s c i .
I n nlartrgu t l t d l)vl~aviorand L h ~ s c lrcvcr b c c l ~
i n lung-lcrnr rnninnlic urlity wlcclr n l u l ul111c:ic I~CII wcrc
in~pulscs so Ihcy J o ~ t ' l act uul r e ~ i ~ l i u i l b ~ l i u t h a r u ~ l ~ r i ~ l i11f
c s trniticrl. . . N;tli11;11i ~ ~ c i i ~ ~ i l [hl
liwls
ngnln," W n ~ n c csad.
Ihcy I ~ n v ew t . n rliucourngud, n11t1
Mcnrnl hrnllll pyolesslolrols also
n
l
h
c
r
than
lnlk
nl1ni11
how
I
n
clcal
said lht: nvcrnll r n k nf n ~ c ~ l o s t c n
will) i t i n ' i ~ps .chulu~icnllyIrcalthy
r c o t r w t l i t t ~1%
' lawcr i l ~ a t rthe public
way. ~ h . uqw 11s n m w s l i s a w atill
pcrccivcs. Luld ]>coplu . . 'l>nlr'l ex r e r.r our.
*.I'WI one o l t l ~ u s c
whu ngrcc lhnt
sell,
rlnn 1 Illinlc nhnnl il.'
you don't nccd nlr Itr<li~pt~iall~~:tlc
.Vnunl: lrroti ttrml I t , I:,.) into 5cnll.
turpr: r ~ n i t t ncvc~~l~udf.,uuid IJr.
narica whcn ~ h c ywcrc 13, bclurc
!:red tlerlin frrum t-r o ilre Johns
a ;:hcallhy rcnsc:
llcc 1t.d ilcvc-lq~crl
I l r q ~ k i n s~ c k t ~FnJli s o d r r Clinic in
of
*CXII;I~
sclvus, Wu 'lrcr said.
IJullimurc. A W y c a r - o l d pricsl who
TII~.~
w
~
t
olltr!v
~
r
r,,,it?h~kmtln t w
i p a lcctt*
IWJ a brier ~ ~ l ~ t l t u n ! ; hwillt
do no w h t n t l ~ r y:Ire nltlnr, nnJ scmlagar .Illycnrs 4360 lioTcS l i l l l c risk 10nmricr
arc
dnlng
n
hcllcr
jnh 01 Jisd j hc wid.
cussing how to c~pprnprialclychmni u t n c r l m nnd vt11e1:~ m ~ k n h ~ v l and
s dcrrrrr, he
neI D C X U U ~I h u ~ g l ~ L
d j i c l l m i i t is in~pessiblcl o prcdicl
said.
wiftl cerh~inlyw l ~ c l h c ar rclr offend- iloq, howcvcr, llld it Is O
II
clcnc' ll~u!
fiT ST. MLl,,ndD
sclln,li
cr wlll c t ~ ~ n ~;rl\ulllcr
ntl
ilcl o l atwsc.
Iqr chill!
.Thcolo,,, Snulhnrn
wllirlr
'Slnc cslimalct tlml 6 nhrcanl n l nvrrnll rr?ritlivism'rnf~s
Icstcrs con he appliccl': l o prlcsls.
~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ \ ~ , " r $ , " ~ ~
.Sonic. for cxan~plc. may DII i n l o
S i p ' - ~rnnsientcalcgory.
n t saminrrrians lnxr 1.111 was 3 wlllr
-&&
!.I
'
*]~i!
twrEnsoN.
WITH THE
.\IIII~
r'nr.t.o~tir~
L>r.pi~lnrcrrl,
ri~
w i d prievb
alhcr mininccrr have jinlra
l l i r o u g l ~tllc dcl)nrttltctil'n I r i : ~ ~ l ~ n c n l
prn tall1 m t t "we Iiave mrr~mmcnded %at liwy not w o t k y o u r r d Irirls.
. . . It's a high-risk siluatmn for lhcie
lncll."
Slm snit1 rcsnnrch nn sex nffsridcrs
in KrrtlucLy f c ~ i t r ~Lhitf
d
Iho grortp
Illat most closely tt~alchcxnlrwivc
ptlt:s.~s mctr who mulclirccl child r r n untlnr npc 16 wt~rr\r.crc nnl ret n f , ~ f~
I ~hvrtt'... ditl nhl tnre 5I);tiifi.
cnntly I m f c r ;~llurCuing through lrcr
and
By Marilyn Elias
LpaDAY
4 /6, zcar
?'
=Y
$"
yw3'
'"
1 1
wkp
wD&
IS homosexuality
to blame for the
child sexual abuse rrids
Pederasty us Pedophilia
Commentary by Judith Reisman
The attached USA Today article (July 17,
2002) relies upon the usual cast of characters in the
pro-Kinsey, pro-amorality debate. "Pederasty" is
the historical, Greek term for homosexual males
who desire sex with boys. This clear semantic
definition is currently politically incorrect.
Drs. Berlin, Bancroft, Geffner, Finkelhor
(cited herein) and all others in the field of "human
sexuality" are painfully aware that the Catholic
church is dealing with pederast abuse. At a 79%
boy abuse population, homosexual assault is the
standard for this crime. Moreover, on the
evidence, as boys more than girls are loath to
report homosexual assault, the disparity between
girl and boy abuse rates would be much greater
than the 79% cited.
As these same '%experts" cited herein have
written -based on false data--that homosexuality is
normal and non predatory, the Catholic pederast
scandal jeopardizes their authority as "sexperts"
and exposes these practitioners to civil and
criminal liabilities for medical malpractice and
consumer fraud. This reparatory measure for
grievances by society should, in this author's view,
be swiftly pursued.
11
13
14
15
Attachment 14:
A
Reisman Vitae
Citing to:
The Lancet,
The American Spectator,
The National Review
And
Dr. Laura's Letter to PBSTV
Re: "Kinsey's Paedophiles"
Author
Researcher
Lecturer
Educator
.-
Dr. Judith Reisman is sought worldwide to speak, lecture, testify, and counsei individuals, organizations,
professionals and governments regarding a) fraudulent sex science, sex education and b) the power and effect of
images and the monopoly media to alter human brain, mind, memory and conduct. The special emphasis of her
work has been and continues to be the negative influence of these change agents upon children and society.
Dr. Reisman is president of The Institute for Media Education, author of the U S . Department of Justice,
Juvenile Justice study, Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler (1989),
Kinsey, Sex and Fraud (Reisman, et al., 1990) and Sop Porn Plays Hardball (1 991), Partner Solicitation
Language as a ReJlection of Male Sexual Orientation (wlJohnson, 1995), and Kinsey, Crimes &
Consequences (1998,2000) and is a news commentator for W0rldNetDaily.com.
She has been a consultant to three U.S. Department of Justice administrations, The U.S. Department of
Education, as well as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Reisman is listed in
numerous Who's Who biographies such as: Who 's Who in Science & Engineering, International Who's
Who in Sexology, International Who's Who in Education, Who 3 Who ofAmerican Women and The World S
Who S Who of Women. Her scholarly findings have had international legislative and scientific import in the
United States, Israel, South Africa, Canada and Australia, while The German Medical Tribune and the
British medical journal, The Lancet demanded that the Kinsey Institute be investigated, saying:
The Kinsey reports (one in 1948 on males and the companion five years later) claimed that
sexual activity began much earlier in life.... and displayed less horror of age differences and
same-sex relationships than anyone at the time imagined. It was as if, to follow Mr. Porter
again, "Anything goes". In Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her
colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports ... Kinsey et a1 ... questioned an
unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a survey of "normal" sexual
behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the sources of information on
stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from pedophiles--or so it must
be hoped. Kinsey.... has left his former co-workers some explaining to do. The Lancet, (Vol.
337: March 2, 1991, p. 547).
To schedule Dr. Reisman for speaking, consulting and to order books call 1-800-476 0975
Email: jareisman@surewest.net Website: drjudithreisman.org
OHIO, 1989: Osborne v. Ohio. Amici cited "Neurochemical Evidence Shows That People React Differently To Pictures Than They Do To Words
Raising New First Amendment Considerations" and thanks "Dr. Judith Reisman for her valuable development of this concept" (:23) and, "J.
Reisman's New York Review of Law and Social Change," (1979) where she addressed media, science and civil rights.
On behalf of the Amici in Osborne v. Ohio.... thanks for your invaluable assistance rendered to us in researching and writing this brief. Your
ideas on how the visual images effect people substantially more than the written word is indeed a new concept and could have many significant
ramifications in the area of the First Amendment. If in fact the court and legislatures do believe that visual images. specifically of sexual,
sexually violent and violent material, will have a greater impact on people in general and children in particular, there may be justification for
more strict legislation in these areas than would apply to the written materiai. Moreover, under a First Amendment analysis, since the harm is
greater, there would be more of a compelling state interest to have stricter laws. (H. Robert Showers, 10/12/89).
USA LOWER COURTS
Crmvford v. Lungren, 1996: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the right of California's news rack laws to protect minors in
support of Amici arguments by the National Law Center for Children and Families. Amici cited to Reisman's Canadian paper, "Pornography in
Neighborhood Convenience Stores: Neurochemical Effects on Women," that "Images reach the brain more quickly than print" (: 15).
Stegan v. Perry, 11994 and 1991: The U.S. States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The lower court in 1991, under Judge
Oliver Gash, cited Reisman's book in rejecting Steffan's appeal. Upon challenge in 1994, Colonel Ronald Ray Esq., Ret., and Reisman filed an
Amicus brief on behalf of the Naval Aviation Foundation in support of the Department of Defense ruling, that homosexuality and sexual conduct
cannot be separated. General P.X. Kelley, former member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Commandant of The Marine Corps, wrote of Reisman's
"groundbreaking work in Kinsey, Sex & Fraud, (October 5 , 1994) in recommending she and Colonel Ray enter the Steffan case.
"
United States v. Knox, 1994: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third District, ruled in support of arguments presented in the Institute for Media
Education Amicus and Arnold & Porter written with Colonel Ron Ray and Randall Shaheen, citing Reisman's research on images and for OJJDP, to
protect children from use in child pornography.
Pepperdine University
Council for National Policy
Human Life International
Johns Hopkins University Medical School
Tel Aviv University
Accuracy in Academic
Accuracy in Media
Concerned Women for America
Rutherford Institute
The Abstinence Clearinghouse
ACADEMIC POSITIONS
Adjunct faculty, George mason University, 1990
Research Full Professor, The American University, 1983-85
Asst./Assoc. Prof., (Martze) University of Haifa, Israel, 1981-83
EXPERT WITNESS: COURT, MILITARY, CIVIC HEARINGS
Invited Paper: HR 3300: The Military Honor & Decency Act (Pornography Law) May 1996
lnvited Paper: South Africa Film and Publications Bill of 1995 (Pornography Law) 1995
Briefed: Selected Lansing Michigan Legislators (Pomography Law) May 1994
Briefed: Kirkland & Ellis (Re: Oral Argument, United States v. Knox) April 1994
Briefed: Australian Parliament Standing Committee on Social Issues (Media Effects) 1992, 1994
Invited Paper: Ontario Human rights Commission (Pornography Effects) 1993
Invited Paper: Senate Committee on Armed Services (Homosexuality)July 1993
Briefed: Army Chief of Staff Gordon Sullivan, Senator Malcolm Wallop (Homosexuality in the Military) December 1993
Invited Paper, Testimony: Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces 1992
Briefed: Inspector General Roland Griffith (Homosexuality)December 1993
Expert Research Younger et al.. v. Stroh (Federal Court Sex Harassment) 1992
Testified: Australian Parliament, Senate Select Committee (X & R Rated Effects) April 1992
Invited Paper: Office of US Surgeon General (Mass Media Harms) March 1992
Testified: State of Georgia Senate Ed Committee (Kinsey-Sex Ed Curriculum) February 1992
Testified: Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office: OH (MapplethorpeTrial) August & October 1990
Testified: City Council; Newport News, VA (Nude Dancing & Public Order) June 1986
Invited Paper: US Attorney General Commission on Pornography: NYC (Effects) January 1986
Testified: US Attorney General Commission on Pornography; Miami (Effects) November 1985
Invited Paper: US Attorney general Task Force, Domestic Violence: DC (Effects) August 1985
Testified: Michigan State Senate Juvenile Justice, Corrections: MI (Effects) October 1980
SELECTED GRANTStPOSITIONS
Bureau of Justice Assistance. US Department of Justice: Grant Reviewer 1991
HHS: Administrator for Children, Youth. and Families: Grant Reviewer 1991
Eastern Division Vice Investigators Association: Inservice Trainer 1987-89
HHS Dept. of Substance Abuse Prevention: Research Paper 1989
Skaggs Foundation: Visual Literacy Training Grant 1987-89
Department of Education: "Drug Free Schools" Grant Reviewer 1987
Department of Education: "Drug Free Videos" Grant Reviewer 1985
Georgetown Pediatrics Department: lnservice Training Seminars Grand Rounds 1984
FBI Academy: EroticaPomography Effects: Inservice Training SeminarNideo 1983
OJJDP Missing Children - Serial Murder Task Force: Inservice Trainer 1983-85
DoJ Office of Juvenile Justice: Principal Investigator. Pornography, Media Research 1983-94
Israel Science Ministry Department of Sex Education: Kinsey and Inservice trainer, Media 1980-83
Scholastics Magazine, NYC: Art & Education Writer, Producer 1970-80
Milwaukee Public Museum: Art/Anthropology Television Writer. Producer 1970s
Cleveland Museum of Art: Art/Head Start, Education Videosfcaptain Kangaroo 1970s
Los Angeles Skirball Museum: HistoryIArcheology Educational Videos 1966-81
Captain Kangaroo CBSTV: Segment Producer, Performance Artist 1976-1982
PASTPRESENT ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER
Founder, Institute of Media Education and the Family, Israel
Bereaved Parents Association (Juvenileautoerotic deaths), AZ
Paul & Lisa, Inc. (Child prostitute rescue organization), CT
Accuracy in Academia, Washington. D.C.
PASTIPRESENT SELECTED MEMBERSHIPS
Women ~nNeuroscience
The American Statistical Association
National Association of Scholars
National Council on Family Relations
American Public Health Association
The New York Academy of Sciences
The International Communication Associations
The National Black Child Development Institute
Research Council on Ethnopsychology
The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex
American Society of Composers, Authors and Pub1ishers
The World Association of Infant Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines
American Association for the Advancement of Science
National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (Fellow)
MEDIAPRESS CITATIONS AND APPEARANCES
(UK) 1981
Journal of Educatronal Thought and Practice In Collectrve
Settlements (Israel) 1983
New York Universiv Review of Law and Socral Change (USA)
1978-79
Women Speaking (UK) July-September 1978
THE LANCET
Really, Dr Kinsey?
"Amording to the Kinsey Repon
Every average man you know
Likes his lovey-dovey to court
When the temperature is low.
But when the thermometer goes way up. .."
A lot more than the lyrics of Cole Porter will reed rewiring
unless serious charges against the late m e d C. Kinscly and tlm of
Playboy
[industry representative, patron]
I
The American Library Association; Freedom to Read
allied with Media Coalition
e.g., ALA v. Reno (1994) advocates against the Child Protection Act
"Friend of the Court" Ferber (1982); legalize child pornography, "...deviat,e sexual
intercourse ...bestiality, sadomasochistic abuse") rejected by U.S. Suprlzrne Ct.
I
US-l"
I- . (
'
Unless otherwise stated, dl of the above statements are taken irom the trstlmonv of Michael .I. Bnmbeqer.
General Counsel. The Medin Coalition. Inc.. Subcommittee on Crime. Judiciary Committee US 1Iousr. April 23.
1988, opposing 1988 child protection
by Tom B e t h e l l
May
I9 9 6
. T h e American Spectator
Mortal Sins
The sexuul revolzltion wus bused on d lie.
Judith Reismdn hds spent thirty yeuu
uncovering the truth.
NATIONAL REVIEW
/ MAY
19, 1997
1997
NATIONAL REVIEW
35
36
1997
-
Cknzc Here: A Man Ol~crcomesthe T w z c Afiemath of Cbildhood Sexual Abuse, he describes his obscenc phone calls as a
form of involuntary "data gathering." Ted Koppel called
the book a "genuinc servicc to anyone who cared about the
roots and consequenccs of chlld abuse." Berendzen finally
became chairman of thc Advisory Board for the National
Center for Survivors of Child Abuse. His wife, Gail, wrote
a "survivors" article for Ladies' Home Journal.
Dr. Reisman-who
stumbled across child abuse in
Kinsey's research, questioned the accuracy of Kinsey's data
'1
, 1
'
HE does not believe that there is such a thing as impartial scientific research into sex. She has no doubt
that the women's-liberation movement was and
endures as a response to the betrayals of the sexual revolution. As for pornography, it "short-circuits the brain" and
precludes rational thought. She is surprised that the women's movement has not produced more opponents of pornography like Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon.
Judith Reisman's story tells us almost more than we
want to know about the inequality of forces in the cultural
war. In fact, the image of war is itself misleading. "War
implies two opposing armies," Dr. Reisman says. In reality
there is only one. The sexual revolution has resembled an
incoming tide more than a war. Nothing seems able to
resist it, and we can only hope that one day it will turn and
move back out to sea. The cultural wreckage left behind
will be considerable. Meanwhile
the laws have been changed,
good habits undermined, the
string untuned.
"How can we have been so
blind?" Dr. Reisman used to hear
her family and friends say when
she was young, referring t o the
Holocaust. "But look at us," she
says. "People cannot identify
their enemies." Still, she has not
lost the gift of optimism. "This
country is blessed," she says.
"Change is possible. We are supposed to stand up and be counted. Beyond that, it is in God's
in the garden?"
hands."
I7
M A Y 19, 1 9 9 7 / N A T I O N A L R E V I E W
37
do
the
right t tun,.,,1
"!go
January 08,2000
Pat Mitchell
Public Broadcasting System
1320 Braddock Place
Alexandria, Virginia, 223 14
RE:
[Tlhe most famous expert in sexology, Professor Alfred Kinsey.. . .[a] mad and
reckless man who was exposed i n last night's Secret History (C-4) as. amongst other
things, a rabid data fetishist, is best remembered for his 1948 mas.num opus. Sexual
Behavior in the Human Male. This terrifying book sent shockwaves in its day around
the civilized world .... What emerged in this deeply shocking prcgramme, was that
Kinsey had enlisted the help of a terrible pervert, a known but unir dicted paedophile,
to collect data for his book. He interfered with hundreds of babies and children and
then passed his odious findings on to Kiusey who offered them to the world as
scientific proof that children were sexual beings from birth.
The proof of that statement may or may not have been evident from the
paedophile's information. What is certainly true, though, is that K insey hirnself was
not only an accessory to child abuse but was also, in himself, a deeply disturbed,
demonic man with a personal interest in every kind of sexual perversion. (Dailj)
Telegraph August 1, 1998)
The findings made from such abhorrent, specious techniques laid the g~.oundworkfor the
sexual revolution, which has left us with AIDS: high rates of STDs and related infertility, and so
many numbers of fatherless children.
Taxpayers expect the PBS to submit to the legal mandates that regulate public
broadcasting by providing real balance in programming and accurate information about
controversial issues. If PBS were willing to present opposing data on all sexua ity issues,
providing prime times and repetition for Kinsey 's Paedophiles would equalize the time and
attention devoted to "It's Elementary," and "Tongues United."
Sex
-
L.
Togetacbsedoswpv*w
dUa$&Vviaitcdrwtcd
the cdarhrl way stOticm
a&ng the KlaPl htitr.
The~kwAdvulced
ahortuband~*~ltt,a&O&sto~d
with a vibntor detr~rmant,a &my, and
anexfensivec*dcrociem(rrad
tapc3.ThcNstionrlSaFcruDiiroapa.
atesoutdthsbuildingand~m>std
ncm-
minister-tunrcddc-Crknmaker, Sutton's Nma pomrry erotic activity as nmd,fun, somttims funny, and always iresthetically phising. The cumdative e k t ,
P
To Receive a Human Sexuality Degree, Certification, Credential, etc., All Applicants Are
Required to Undergo the SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) a "Model" Program of
Massive Pornography/Obscenity, its Stated Mission One of "Desensitization."
Indiana
University
Education Base
Planned
"Credentialing"
L
Parenthood Int.
I
I
,
I
Founded in New
York 1916
Founded
Nationally I971
I
II
Kinsey Institute
1938
,I
1
1
I
I
Research
Base
Mahad
Gagnon
Martin
Simon
Alan
--
Gut@achel
lnst.
Founded New
Masters
York
Technical
Johnson
1959
Assistance
Branch of PPFA
1968
I,
(I
August 26,2002
Letters to the Editor
Washington Times
Dear Editor,
Howard Fishman's reply to our article about the Catholic bishops taking advice from people
who had covered up criminal sex abuse of children was full of name-calling and irrelevant,
inaccurate arguments, but nowhere did he deny the facts: that Dr. Paul McHugh and Dr. Fred
Berlin had knowingly concealed multiple incidents of child rape and assault from authorities,
despite a Maryland law requiring them to report the crimes.
Fishman (and the bishops) should consult the March 4,1990 Baltimore Sun, which reported
Berlin's actions as head of Johns Hopkins's Sexual Disorders Clinic ("Doctor skirts reporting law
on sex crimes"): "Dr. Berlin acknowledged in two interviews last week that he understood the
legislature's intent but had deliberately skirted the reporting requirements." The article said
Berlin had "vehemently opposedn the new law before the General Assembly.
...
Attorney General J. Joseph Curran, Jr., said, "the language of the law could not be clearer"
and that Berlin, a mental-health provider, was not exempt from it. Sen. Thomas M, Yeager, a
member of the Governor's Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, declared, "The attorney general
should come down on him. He's in violation of the law-it's that simple."
"Dr. Berlin's boss, Dr. Paul R McHugh," the article continued, said the hospital "did agree
with the Sexual Disorders Clinic's interpretation" of the law. "We did what we thought was
appropriate," McHugh stated. Berlin acted with "the blessing of his superiors," said the article.
Fisbman objects to our reporting the close tie between former McHugh subordinate Berlin
and Sexual Disorders Clinic founder John Money. But the tie is revealing. Money told PMDIM:
The Journal of Paedophilia (Spring, 1991) that "the vast majority of paedophiles who are put in jail
have no business being in jail," and that "I would never report anybody" who molested a child. Yet
Berlin co-founded the Clinic with Money and "considers him one of his most important mentors"
(see John Colapinto's As Nature Made Him: The Boy m o Was Raised as a Girl), Both Money and
Berlin claim psychiatry can control child molesters.
The bishops' Web site (www.usccb.org) carries a 1997 interview with Berlin in which he says
priests who have committed sex crimes against children should sometimes be allowed to continue as
priests and should sometimes be sent back to parishes. It is high time the bishops stopped relying
on Berlin and McHugh for advice on pedophilia.
By the way, an Internet search reveals that Fishman has lectured on "child abuse hysterian
and offers himself as an aexpert witness" for those "wrongly accused or convicted, especially of
abuse."
Dr. Judith Reisman
Dr. Dennis Jarrard
Strange bedfellows
August 21,2002
Judith Reisman wrote "Kinsey:Crimes and Consequences," "Kinsey,Sex and Fraud," and "Soft
Porn Plays Hardball." Dennis Jarrard served as an adviser to the Los Angeles County Commission
on Obscenity and Pornography (1991-2001)and as chairman of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles
Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (1986-1992).
11
13
14
15
Attachment 15:
GAO Report on Sex Offender
Treatment Failures & DOJ Report
on Child Abductions
TRANSLATION: NO PROGRAMS
ARE PROVEN TO REHABILITATE
SEX OFFENDERS
Of 550 Therapy programs from 1977 to 1996 analyzed by the GAO,
none were proven to reduce sex offender recidivism. The data are
therefore labeled, euphemistically, Inconclusive in that they are not
shown to reduce sex offender recidivism. Sincere thanks to Dr. Linda
Jeffrey for locating this report, buried away in the dustbin of antiquity.
Appendix I1
--
--
the cnrnlnal jwtlce system The study keeps records and follows up on
part~c~pants
who drop out of the treatment program before corrrplet~on
To date, preliminary results of the evaluation study have not revealed a
statistically significant treatment effect. Overall, offenders completing the
treatment program and the volunteer control group had approximately the
s a n e recidivls~nrate for new sex crimes. The nonvolunteer group had a
somewhat higher recidivism rate, but it was not statistically different from
the other two groups.
Page 17
Research Results
You will tieed the Adobe@ Acrobat@ Reader to vlew these PDF files Download a free copy of
the Adobe Acrobat Reader.
http://www.wnd.com/news/pnnter-inendly
.asp'!AK'I'ICLE-IU=W
By Art Moore
One of Hollywood's leading men is risking his reputation with a plan to portray the "father of the
sexual revolution," Alfred Kinsey, contends a chief critic of the late researcher.
The Francis Ford Coppola biographical drama, set to begin production
next spring, has tapped Irish-born star Liam Neeson to bring to life a
man researcher Judith Reisman calls the "most infamous pedophile
propagandist in scientific history."
The screenplay, with the working title "Kinsey'sReport," was written
by Oscar-winner Bill Condon of "Gods and Monsters" fame, who also
will direct the film.
Condon, who says there would be "no Playboy or Dr. Ruth without
[Kinsey's]liberating effects," promises it will not be an "art-house
movie."
"I hope it's one of those movies that speaks about thmgs," he said in an
interview published bv E! online. "It does feel like it's time to remind
people of Kinsey's ideas, which I think are liberating. I hope there's an
exhilarating feeling you get when you come out of the theater."
Open letter
But Reisman, author of "Kinsev: Crimes & Conseauences,"has sent an open letter of warning to
Neeson, asserting that the film will place him in "a hideously inaccurate role, much like playing the
monster Mengele as a mere controversial figure."
She wrote: "Mr. Neeson, an appealing and respected actor like you surely does not wish to be known
for celebrating a man who directed massive child sexual abuse."
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp'!AKLl=YY I
An assistant to Neeson's agent Ed Limato said Thursday that Reisman's letter was forwarded to the
actor's "people," but they "cannot guarantee a response."
But later in the day, according to Reisman, Neeson's office requested a copy of a film produced by
Britain's Yorkshire Television called "Kinsey's Paedophiles."
Reisman, who has critiqued Kinsey's research for more than 20 years, says
Kinsey increasingly is discounted by scholars as a "pathetic sexual
psychopath" whose data were derived from an unrepresentative proportion of
the population - mostly prison inmates and sex offenders, including
pedophiles. Kinsey concluded, for example, that 69 percent of white males had
had at least one experience with a prostitute.
Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, former adviser to the Kinsev Institute at
Indiana Universitv, has admitted that Kinsey, the father of three children, was
not the conventional academic and family man the university presented, but
was sexually compromised. In his 1997book "Alfred C. Kinsey: A
Public/Private Life," which was excerpted by New Yorker magazine, the
Alfred C. Kinsev
author describes the sex researcher as; sad&nasochistic homo>exual on a
perverted mission. Kinsey produced pornography in his attic - filming his wife, male staff and their
wives as performers - and sexually harassed his male students.
Reisman notes that Kinsey, who died in 1956, is praised by the North American Man-Boy Love
Association for creating the "data"that support "the struggle we fight today." She finds his work as
the basis for weakened laws and cultural norms that have helped foster a sharp rise in sex crimes
against children, noting that 58,200 abductions by non-family members were recorded by the FBI in
1999, most of which involved sexual victimization.
In 1981, Reisman delivered a paper to the 5th World Congress on Sexuality, charging that the Kinsey
Reports contained a record of human experiments conducted by pedophiles on hundreds, perhaps
thousands, of children. The Kinsey study has been used to support the contention that sexual activity
in children is natural and healthy and should not be repressed.
She points to pages 160-161of Kinsey's 1948 book "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male," in which the
children's "screams," their "convulsions,"their "hysterical weeping," "fighting"and "striking the
partner (adult)"are judged by Kinsey as reflecting "definite pleasure from the situation."
Kinsey Institute director John Bancroft maintains that the institute "has never carried out sexual
experiments on children, either during Alfred Kinsey's time as director or since."
He has acknowledged, however, that the data on "speed of orgasm" and other details in Tables 31-34
of Kinsey's 1948book could only have been collected through illegal activity. In a 1998 paper by
Bancroft called "Kinsey and Children," he says the information "came from the carefully documented
records of one man." Kinsey referred to the man as "Mr. Green," a pedophile who kept meticulous
records of the 800 boys he molested between 1917 and 1948.
Reisman maintains, however, that the 1998 documentary "Kinsey's Paedophiles," which has never
been shown in the U.S., documented that Kinsey solicited information from and directed the data
gathering of many pedophiles.
http://www.wnd.com~news/printer-friendly.asp:'AK'I
ICLb-lD=2989
"Mr. Bancroft eagerly dodges the fact that whether Kinsey used one rapist to tell the world that child
sex is normal, or whether he recruited many rapists - which he did - it doesn't change the fact that
there isn't a shred of scientific data that would support the notion of child sexuality," Reisman told
WND.
In response to a 1998 resolution by the Indiana state legislature urging the assembly to not
appropriate public funds to the institute, Bancroft said of Kinsey:
"He can be criticized for making use of information about children's sexual responses obtained from
individuals who were criminally involved with those children, not because it was improper to do so,
but because of the uncertain validity of such information. But the large part of his work remains a
supreme example of dedicated scientific research which continues to be important and useful to all of
those who are researching in the field."
Bancroft maintained that "however much Kinsey's scientific curiosity may have misled him, he did
nothing wrong, 'criminal,' or 'fraudulent.' Some have criticized him for not reporting this man to the
police. Any tendency to do such a thing, with this research subject or any other, would have been
contrary to the whole ethical basis of his project, in which he persuaded people to share their sexual
secrets in return for a guarantee of confidentiality."
"In fact, next year, I'm gonna play Alfred Kinsey, the guy who did all the research on sexuality and
sexual politics in America in the '50s. His results,were astounding. Really big stuff. He got on the
cover of Time magazine."
Neeson said he does not set out to play real people.
"What usually motivates me is the quality of the writing," he said. "But yeah, I guess I may
subconsciously seek them out. These are people who stand for something, something that is good to
remind audiences of. They had a code of ethics that you perhaps don't find anymore."
Big stars
Academy Award-winning actors Russell Crowe, Tom Hanks, Kevin Spacey and Harrison Ford "all
flirted with the lead role in one of the hottest scripts making the rounds," according to Anderson
Jones in his "Movie Scoops" column on E! online. George Clooney was asked to take the Kinsey role,
!-,*&
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly .asp'!AKI'ICLE-lD=2989
but passed, according to Jones, who called the film project "a provocative, erotic and potentially
controversial movie."
"Kinsey is this amazing character," said director Condon, according to Jones' report, "very, very
complicated. It's an interesting, difficult part to cast. When it comes to sex, people come with a lot of
baggage, and the challenge will be getting the baggage that fits Kinsey's. You need an actor who will
bring you inside this character."
Condon said he also considered Ralph Fiennes, Jeff Bridges and Michael Douglas for the role.
Jones commented that the Kinsey film "appeals to actors looking for a challenge, because it's craftily
structured around a series of flashbacks and flash-forwards, features explicit discussions about
sexuality and hints of Kinsey's widely reported bisexuality."
The script is not new, Jones said. About 10 years ago, screenwriter Michael Davis wrote another
script called Kinsey, which turned out to be a "practically unreadable light comedy that mined laughs
from Dr. Kinsey's 'embarrassing' sexual peccadilloes."
The film, financed by Myriad Pictures, will be released in the U.S. by MGM's United Artists division.
"Kinsey"is one of five Myriad-financed films to be produced by Coppola's American Zoetrope
studios. The Hollywood Reporter notes that three of the five come from openly homosexual artists,
including Condon.
Much at stake
For the Kinsey Institute, according to Reisman, the film likely will be seen as a boon to the institute's
attempts to bolster Kinsey's reputation in the face of mounting criticism of his character and work.
"The Kinsey Institute is in very serious rehabilitation mode," Reisman said, noting that at a 50th
anniversary celebration of Kinsey's first book, in 1998, an academic in the field of "sexology"stated
that if Kinsey were undermined, it would "undermine everything we had been working on for all
these years."
Bancroft announced in 1998 that the Ford Foundation had supplied a grant to help fund a
media-relations firm to plan "a proactive strategy to counter the ongoing campaign to shut down the
Kinsey Institute and discredit its founder."
I
I..ku"
In her book "Kinsey, Crimes, & Consequences," Reisman shows how Kinsey and his sex reports of
1948 and 1953undergird the entire modem academic sexology field, including institutions such as
Planned Parenthood and SIECUS, the Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S., which
helped launch sex education in schools when it was founded in 1964.
The Kinsey Institute is clearly uneasy about probes into the Kinsey archive, according to one of
Kinsey's most recent biographers, Englishman Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy.
In the Yorkshire film production on Kinsey, produced by award-winner Tim Tate, Gathorne-Hardy
tells how he was given access to Kinsey's March 1956 files, which show the sex researcher's use of
pedophiles.
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-fnendly.asp'!AKl'lCL~~l
Describing the Kinsey Institute as "nervous"because "its funding depends a lot on its reputation,"
Hardy said director Bancroft demanded that Hardy swear he never personally saw the documents.
Hardy's typewritten notes regarding the exchange with Bancroft said:
Must be written as if information got from [former director] Paul [Gebhard] and Bancroft.
... Don't reveal that [Kinsey] wenton gathering histories [from these pedophiles] until
1954.
Hardy's notes on the file indicate several active pedophiles on Kinsey's list of aides:
[Kinsey] was deeply influenced by five pedophile headmasters who were quite clear they
had very warm relationships, loving relationships with young adolescent boys of 12 or 13.
In her letter to Neeson, Reisman warned that Yorkshire Television would want to reissue its
"unflattering documentary should you make this film."
"Please disengage yourself from this unworthy production, and please feel free to contact me should
you want to talk or to see the extant documentation on any and all of the statements above," Reisman
wrote. "Thank you."
Related stories:
Catholics learning sex from Kinsev's disciples
'Nothing new' in book condoning child sex