US Army IC Q&A18 APR 2011

DRAFT RFP Questions from Industry and Government Responses as 4/18/2011
Final RFP, once issued, shall supersede any previous response
1. Will results from the Phase 1 and Phase 2 evaluation and testing be made available to the
contractor? Will additional time allowance be added to the schedule for Phase 3 to allow for
incorporation of design improvements?
RESPONSE: Test and evaluation results may be released as necessary to support meaningful
debriefings and/or discussions. The final RFP will not refer to a Phase III but rather a Down-
select Evaluation. The design of the weapon will remain frozen throughout the source selection
process, which will also include the down-select. Therefore, no additional time will be afforded
to Offerors to permit design improvements.
2. We did not see a due date specified for the submission of the proposals. How many days after
the issuance of the final RFP will proposals be due?
RESPONSE: Once the final RFP is issued, Offerors will be given 90 days to submit their proposal.
3. Can you provide the full list of CDRLs?
RESPONSE: Throughout the Draft RFP there a requirements which require CDRLs. The final and
approved CDRL list will made available as part of the final RFP.
4. A progress payment clause was not included in the draft RFP. It is requested that the standard
provision (52.232-13) and clause (52.2322-16) be added to the RFP.
RESPONSE: No provisions for progress payments will be provided.
5. 52.215-20, Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other than Certified Cost or
Pricing Data (OCT 2010) is listed twice, as both L-16 and L-17. Also, as a competitive procurement
we request that this requirement be removed.
RESPONSE: This clause has been removed.
6. Introduction - L1.1.1 (page 95 of 122 OF THE ORIGINAL Draft RFP): “An Offeror is permitted to
submit one (1) proposal for consideration, which offers a single design that best meets the
Government requirements.” We request that this language be removed to allow for multiple
designs to be submitted since this will present the Government with the widest range of possible
solutions.
RESPONSE: It is incumbent upon each vendor to submit the weapon they deem best meets the
requirements of the IC purchase description.
7. L.2.3.1 Hardware Submission (page 97 of 122 of the original Draft RFP): “Sample hardware shall
be representative of the Offerors production processes and quality that can be expected in full
rate production units.”New designs typically are not produced on production type tooling,
especially for a small quantity that is required for the bid samples. Can you clarify what flexibility
may exist for items to be “representative” of the Offerors production processes?
8. RESPONSE: No Flexibility exists. All weapons submitted must be capable of performing

according to the testing outlined in the RFP and the Purchase Description (AR-PD-173).
Prototype weapons will be tested in the same manner as will weapons that are being produced
on a steady production line. As a NDI, the design should already exist.
9. Please provide a schedule that shows durations and milestone dates within each of the three
phases.
RESPONSE: Draft RFP: Jan 2011

Pre-Solicitation Conf: Mar 2011
Final RFP: May 2011 (estimated)
Phase I Evaluation: Jul-Oct 2011 (estimated)
Phase II Evaluation: Nov 2011 - Jul 2012 (estimated)
Contract Award(s): Oct 2012 (estimated)
Down-select Evaluation: Oct 2012 - Mar 2013 (estimated)
10. Is there an additional test to directly compare the candidates to the M4 with the down selected
design from Phase 3? If so, will the test be done with the current M4 or M4 PIP?
RESPONSE: There will be no additional tests.
11. Will evaluation of the cost proposal include factoring to weigh life cycle costs against initial UPC?
RESPONSE: No, the evaluation of the cost proposal will not include the Life-Cycle Cost. The cost
factor, however, will consider spare parts replacement based on the spare parts list as part of
the cost evaluation. The complete methodology that will be used to determine the evaluated
price for the spare parts list will be contained in the cost volume sections of the RFP. In
addition, the RFP will not contain a separate factor for life-cycle cost. The updated RFP contains
a factor entitled “Fielding, Operational and Supportability Impacts” which evaluates impact
drivers for the Offeror’s proposed carbine that will receive a rating.
12. Please describe or specify the test procedure utilized to evaluate the IC for reduced detection by
IR/EM sensor systems.
RESPONSE: IR digital image of weapon, on a dark background, every hour from 1200 to 2400
hours.
13. Please clarify the definition of “Offeror’s facility.”
RESPONSE: The Offeror’s facility is where the proposed IC will be manufactured.

14. If a bidder contemplates overseas production, will the Government provide an on-site QAR to
that overseas facility IAW Clause E-6?
RESPONSE: Yes
15. If a bidder contemplates overseas production of all or a portion of the finished product, how is
compliance with Clause H-1(1)(b) possible?
RESPONSE: This is only applicable to contractor employees working on Picatinny Arsenal.
16. Ref: Section 3.5.12 of AR-PD-173: If the candidate firearm meets the performance requirements
of the specification (i.e., accuracy), does it matter that the barrel is free-floating or not?
RESPONSE: The requirement allowing for a free floating barrel, is an objective requirement
therefore it is not a restriction as only threshold requirements are required. However, if the (O)
Objective is met, it supersedes the (T) Threshold requirement. Requirement will remain as is.
17. Can the Government provide its best estimate for:

a. Release of formal RFP for the Individual Carbine
b. Due date for the RFP response (bid due date)
c. Due date for bid samples
RESPONSE:
a. The goal is to release the formal RFP in May 2011. However, this will be impacted by
the number of changes required to be made to the RFP.
b. 90 days after issuing final RFP
c. 90 days after issuing final RFP
Please note these are all estimates.
18. Can the Government recommend source(s) / vendor(s) for the purchase of sample(s):
a. M9 Bayonet
b. M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System (we have the required licenses for this type of
firearm)
c. M203A2 Grenade Launcher (we have the required licenses for this type of firearm)
d. M320A1 Grenade Launcher (we have the required licenses for this type of firearm)
e. M23 Blank Firing Attachment (BFA)
f. M68 Reflex Sight w Mount
g. M150/XM150 Rifle Combat Optic (RCO)
h. MILES Training Module
i. CCMCK Force-on-force Training Kit
j. Universal Storage Rack (12011919)
k. 5.56 Ammunition Types (except M855A1) listed on pg. 11 of AR-PD-173
l. PEQ-15
m. PEQ-15A
n. AN/PAS-13
o. AN-PSQ-23
RESPONSE: No sources can be provided. However through the HP White Compatibility Check,
the Government made available the M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System and M320
Grenade Launcher. All other items are commercially available.
19. The 10 rifle bid samples (plus all required accessories and spare parts) will be required 90 days
from the final Solicitation issue date. Will the Government assist companies that require the
importation of this material with a Request (“Demo”) Letter that meets the requirements of the
ATF?
RESPONSE: The Government will work with the ATF to expedite the process by providing them
notification of the RFP and supplying them with any additional paperwork they may require.
However, it is the Offeror’s responsibility to complete all the required forms and comply with
applicable laws and regulations governing this issue.
20. What is the purpose of the Government’s request for three Mann/Test barrels from each
vendor? It is our understanding that these barrels need to be manufactured to the Government’s
drawing, and will therefore be “identical” (within caliber) between all vendors. We want to
ensure we are not misunderstanding the requirement.
RESPONSE: A. The three Mann barrels are required to conduct Lethality Testing. B. No, each
Mann barrel should be manufactured such that internally it represents the weapon being
submitted for consideration, and externally to the dimensions in the RFP so that it is compatible
with the Government test fixtures.
21. Will the required 10 bid samples need to demonstrate compatibility with:
M9 bayonet
M203A2 Grenade Launcher
M320A1 Grenade Launcher
M26 MASS
by providing all of the necessary interfaces/adapters?
RESPONSE: The IC candidates need to be compatible with the accessories. If they are not
compatible with the accessories, as they are, then the vendors are required to provided
mounting adapters that allow compatibility with the accessories. In the case of the grenade
launcher, alternates can be submitted.
22. Please specify what is the Ph / Pi of the M4/M4A1 carbines.
RESPONSE: As per the PD, the Pi of the M4A1, and Ph at 300m, will be assessed along with the
IC candidates, where the M4A1 is the baseline. This will be done to ensure that the data is
collected in the exact same manner and under the exact same conditions. Table I of AR-PD-173
identifies M4 Ph values at 400, 500 & 600 meters as the Threshold values that the IC needs to
meet.
23. By “ hyper-burst “, do you mean controlled burst?

RESPONSE: “Hyper-burst" is defined as "A firing mode that provides multiple/two rounds on
target/aim point with a single trigger pull, with the shooter only perceiving single-shot recoil
without the muzzle jump/muzzle climb associated with standard burst and/or full automatic
firing" and appears in paragraph 6.7 of AR-PD-173 with the other definitions.
24. Please clarify difference between full automatic mode and burst mode in this paragraph.
RESPONSE: Burst Mode: The fire control/safety lever is moved to the "BURST" position by the
operator. The operator pulls the trigger and the trigger's mechanical function allows the weapon
to fire a limited number (e.g., 3 ) of rounds per trigger pull. Full Automatic Mode: The fire
control/safety lever is moved to the "AUTOMATIC" position by the operator. The operator pulls
the trigger and the weapon fires at cyclic rate until the operator releases the trigger. The
operator may limit the number of rounds fired by the weapon via using the "trigger control"
(quickly releasing the trigger) technique.
25. What is meant by “touch” when referring to safety check?
RESPONSE: Touch is defined as to "feel by hand."
26. Please identify danger level of M4.
RESPONSE: The danger level of the M4A1 will be assessed along with the IC candidates as a
baseline. This will be done to ensure that the data is collected in the exact same manner and
under the exact same conditions.
27. Can you better define the color “taupe”?
RESPONSE: The requirement did not specify a specific color code.
28. Page 10 of original draft RFP, 3.5.6 a) Is this a “T” or “O” requirement?
RESPONSE: As stated in 1.2 of AR-PD-173, all requirements that are not labeled with a "T" or
"O" are THRESHOLD requirements.
29. Page 10 of original RFP, 3.5.8 Please clarify if 140 dB are to be achieved with or without silencer.
RESPONSE: This requirement is the objective requirement WITHOUT the suppressor/silencer.
30. Page 13 of original RFP, 3.5.13 Please clarify what are the “operational environment/conditions”.
RESPONSE: As per paragraph 4.6.13 of AR-PD-173, this test will be done during the reliability
test and therefore, will be conducted at the operating conditions of the reliability test.
31. Page 14 of original RFP, 3.5.20 What are the operational capabilities of the M203 and M320A1
GLs?
RESPONSE: As per paragraph 3.5.20 of AR-PD-173, the capabilities of the M203 & M320 are
found in MIL-L-45935 and AR-PD-154, respectively.
32. Page 16 of original RFP, 3.6.1.7 Please clarify what are the “action steps“ carried out by the
operator.
RESPONSE: As stated in 4.7.1.7 of AR-PD-173 procedures of test can be found in TOP 3-2-045.
33. Page 17 of original RFP, 3.6.2.1 Please clarify what you mean by “functional damage”.
RESPONSE: “Functional damage" means any damage that prevents the proper and safe
operation of the weapon.
34. Page 18 of original RFP, 3.7.1 Please explain how you calculate the probability % in this reliability
test.
RESPONSE: Paragraph 4.8.1 of AR-PD-173, and its sub paragraphs explain how the reliability
test is conducted. In addition, paragraph 4.8.1.4 says how many failures are allowed of each
type during the firing of the reliability test.
35. Page 6 of original RFP, 3.4.1 b) Please define “90% probability”. For example: 9 out of 10 rounds
of the 10-round group meet the requirement.
RESPONSE: IC system accuracy (technical measurement of dispersion) shall be 5-inch mean

radius at 300 meters throughout barrel life. Methodology: From the data collected the Mean
Radius will be calculated at each interval. When the mean radius exceeds 5 inches that barrel
will be replaced with a new barrel and an initial 3x10 round groups will be fired. This process
will continue throughout the reliability sub-test. Once the reliability sub-test is completed a
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) will be made for the Characteristic Barrel Life. The
Characteristic Life will be the Barrel Life for that weapon where it will meet the dispersion
requirement.
Shall be 5” extreme spread at 300 meters throughout barrel life with 0.9 probability and shall be
10” extreme spread at 600 meters throughout barrel life with 0.9 probability. Methodology:
From the data collected the extreme spread will be calculated at each interval. The barrels will
be replaced when the Mean Radius criteria has been exceeded. Once the reliability sub-test is
completed a MLE will be made to determine the Characteristic Barrel Life. The Characteristic Life
is used to determine the 0.9 probability where sample barrels should maintain the 5 inch
extreme spread. The sample of barrels will then be assessed at against this estimate. Ninety (90)
percent of the barrels in the sample need to be at or above this estimate.
36. Page 12 of original RFP, 3.5.12 Can the “removable mounting surface below the barrel” be a MIL-
STD-1913 Picatinny Rail? What is the intended purpose of it being removable? Can we
alternatively provide a rail-cover/hand-guard to provide a gripping surface to the user when
accessories are not mounted?
RESPONSE: The rail as required by 3.5.12 of AR-PD-173, has to be compatible with accessories
made to attach to a MIL-STD-1913 rail, therefore they would attach to a MIL-STD-1913 rail.
Removal of the rail is to accommodate under barrel mounted accessories that do not use the
MIL-STD-1913 compatible rail for mounting. If the rail is not removable, the Offeror must
submit an adapter to accommodate accessories.
A rail cover/hand-guard is not required.
37. Will a CCMCK-style force-on-force conversion kit be required with the 10 bid samples?
RESPONSE: No, the plan (as outlined in VOLUME I - Written Technical Proposal) is what is
required which will be submitted in accordance with the RFP.
38. Will MILES training system compatibility be required with the 10 bid samples?
RESPONSE: No.
39. Page 8 original draft RFP, 3.4.11 Is this a “T” or “O” requirement?
RESPONSE: Yes, the referenced paragraph 3.4.11 is a threshold. As stated in 1.2 of AR-PD-173,
all requirements that are not labeled with a "T" or "O" are THRESHOLD requirements.
40. Page 19 original draft RFP, 3.7.16 Will the 10 sample rifles require all of the markings required in
this section? UID, cage code, model identification, caliber, proof testing, MP inspection, etc. We
would propose to submit rifles with “commercial” markings and certify that we will be able to
meet the requirements of this section in production.
RESPONSE: Commercial markings are acceptable EXCEPT for UID which must be part of the
submitted weapons as this will be evaluated during weapon testing. The UID label should be
applied to the serialized component of the weapon.
41. Does the Close Combat Mission Capability Conversion refer to the currently fielded “Simunitions
Kit?”
RESPONSE: The CCMCK is fielded in the Army and that is what is being referred.
42. What are the “each type of ammunition” stipulated in this factor?
RESPONSE: See paragraph 3.5.9 of the Purchase Description (AR-PD-173).
43. Government wants rights within 4 years of starting deliveries, part of which is during LRIP. How
will proposals be evaluated where claims exceed that delivery period?
RESPONSE: The Government desires data rights that will enable future competition of the
design. Evaluation will be based on how well the proposed data rights agreement allows the
Government to achieve its goal. Please refer to Section M.3.4.G.
44. What organizations will be represented on the Source Selection Board.
RESPONSE: The information requested is internal to the Government.

45. Why is the Government not requiring all bidders to have a US presence upon contract award?
RESPONSE: No statutory requirement exists. Therefore, it is desired not required.
46. Is the charging handle considered to be one of the weapon “controls?”
RESPONSE: Yes
47. We presume the weights/dimensions noted as requirements are meant to be the M4/M4A1. If
so, will the Government revisit those to ensure they are correct?
RESPONSE: These are from the requirements document.
48. Is the charging handle on the currently fielded IC considered “ambidextrous?”
RESPONSE: There are no currently fielded ICs.
49. Will cold (environmental testing) be conducted in the chamber and then moved to firing position
for testing?
RESPONSE: No. The weapon and ammunition will be conditioned as a system and fired from the
chamber. Procedures IAW TOP 3-2-045.
50. High Temperature? Same as Low Temperature question.
RESPONSE: No. Procedures are the same as the Low temperature test. Weapons and
ammunition will be conditioned as a system and fired from the chamber. Procedures IAW
TOP3-2-045.
51. Is chrome lined barrel considered an environmental pollutant?
RESPONSE: Yes.
52. When are these MPI inspections to be performed?
RESPONSE: Non-Destructive Testing conducted in Initial Inspection, at intervals of 6,000,

12,000, 18,000 rounds, and Final Inspection.
53. What are the Thermal Shock test protocols?
RESPONSE: Thermal Shock Testing will be conducted IAW MIL-STD 810G.
54. What temperatures will the weapon be heated to?
RESPONSE: 160F
55. Is the “shock” a sudden accelerated cooling?

RESPONSE: This is a sudden transition in extreme low and high temperatures. IAW MIL-STD-
810G.
56. What temperature will the weapon be “shocked” to?
RESPONSE: IAW MIL-STD-810G. After four hours at -65F the weapon is removed and within
one minute placed in a preconditioned chamber of 160F. The process is repeated until the item
is exposed to each temperature three times.
57. Define Abrasion?
RESPONSE: Abrasion is defined as " a wearing, grinding, or rubbing away by friction.” Testing
will be conducted IAW TOP 3-2-045 Sand and Dust compound; however the blower speed is
increased to 56mph and weapons will be inspected for abrasion, which is to say any scrapes,
spotting, or abrading of the weapon coating.
58. What abrasive material will be used?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045 Sand and Dust compound.
59. What are the Transportation Vibration test protocols?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045.
60. What are the Dust testing protocols? Will a test conforming to the military specification be
conducted?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. The sand and dust compounds identified in the TOP have been
chosen to comply with the information in AR 70-38 and MIL-HDBK-310.
61. Is the Dust test a blowing or settling test?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. Weapons will be subjected to static dust procedure for dust
exposure.
62. What are the Mud, Ice test protocols?
63. What are the toxins being tested for?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. Common small arms may produce ammonia, carbon dioxide,
carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide.
64. Is exposure to lead dust from either of the “ammunitions” a concern?
RESPONSE: Yes. Test center will analyze samples.

65. What is considered “fouling?”
RESPONSE: Excessive Carbon build-up resulting in a failure.
66. Drawing #8449880 - storage rack assembly schematic that does not provide dimensional details
to enable determination of weapon compatibility with the rack.
RESPONSE: The Army is now fielding universal racks which are reconfigurable.
67. Will CDRLS be provided with the final solicitation or are they only a reference in this draft RFP
and are not included in a separate attachment in Section J?
RESPONSE: CDRLS will be included in the Final RFP.
68. Will the US Government clarify the requirement for delivery of Mann Barrels? The solicitation
appears to require Mann Barrels for all offerings, even those using standard USG ammunition?
RESPONSE: Each Mann barrel should be manufactured such that internally it represents the
weapon being submitted for consideration, and externally to the dimensions in the RFP, so that
it is compatible with the Government test fixtures.
69. Is the probability of incapacitation based on the performance of the M855A1?
RESPONSE: The baseline for incapacitation is M855A1 fired from the M4A1.
70. Please provide the Pi performance of the M4 for the target sets specified in Table III.
RESPONSE: This data will not be provided.
71. What are the Ph/Pi scores of record for the M4 in all configurations noted in the sub paragraphs?
RESPONSE: The data will be collected in side-by-side testing and therefore cannot be provided
at this time.
72. Does the US Army plan on providing pressure data for the M855A1 when fired at 160 deg F and -
60 deg F, in accordance with TOP 3-2-045?
RESPONSE: No.
73. Will the data be collected by the same group of War-fighters on the same day and conditions
(side by side analysis) between the M4 and IC candidate weapons?
RESPONSE: War-fighters will utilize weapons to generate data that will be collected under same
conditions amongst all remaining candidates in down-select evaluation.
74. Please clarify the intent of specification that only have an Objective requirement?
RESPONSE: If there is no threshold requirement, then the requirement is desired but not
required.
75. Is there a desire to have modular barrel capability/interchangeability at the unit/operator level
and if so what is the performance specification/evaluation methodology for it?
RESPONSE: Submitted systems should meet the requirements as specified in the Purchase
Description and will be evaluated in accordance with Section M of the RFP.
76. Will the M68 & M150 be provided to vendors in advance of final proposal submission (so that
vendors may conduct advanced confirmation testing)?
RESPONSE: The Government is currently examining the possibility of providing a non-firing

compatibility check.
77. Clarify any requirement for the Sound Suppressor quantities beyond the Bid Sample in L.2.
RESPONSE: There is no additional requirement beyond what is outlined in the RFP and the PD.
78. Can the Government provide samples or make available for purchase the quantity of
ammunition?
RESPONSE: No.
79. Please provide a list of standard accessories that the US Army would currently use on the weapon
rails.
RESPONSE:
M68 Reflex Sight w/Mount (CCO)
M150 Rifle Combat Optic
PEQ-15
PEQ-15A
AN/PAS-13
AN-PSQ23
80. Are all of the MIL STD 1913 Picatinny Rails required to be numbered?
RESPONSE: MIL-Std-1913 rails are not required. Backwards compatibility with accessories that
attach to MIL-Std-1913 rails is required. The attachment points require numbered positions on
all the surfaces.
81. To satisfy the requirements for performance and reliability testing of the weapon equipped with
a grenade launcher, will the USG provide or make available for purchase the M203A2 and
M320A1 to vendors as GFE for evaluation prior to submission of hardware?
RESPONSE: The Government is currently examining the options of providing a non-firing

compatibility check.
82. Will the USG provide interface dimensions for the M203A2 and M320A1?
RESPONSE: No.
83. Will the USG provide the MILES training module to vendors as GFE for evaluation prior to
submission of hardware in order to ensure this performance requirement is achieved?
RESPONSE: No.
84. The UID label should be applied to the serialized component instead of "lower receiver."
RESPONSE: The UID label should be applied to the serialized component. The PD will be updated
to reflect this change.
85. Drawing #12999553 - top level assembly drawing showing the quadrant sight and M203 leaf sight
attachment; this drawing does not provide any information relevant to the requirements of AR-
PD-173.
RESPONSE: The drawings are provided as a reference to give vendors top level M203 drawings.
The drawings are not part of requirement.
86. Drawing #12973114 - envelope dimension drawing; no details of M203 quick release bracket that
would allow for assessing compatibility with M203 grenade launcher.
RESPONSE: The drawings are provided as a reference to give vendors top level M203 drawings.
The drawings are not part of requirement.
87. Please define the primer sensitivity specification for all the ammunition types used?
RESPONSE: The requirement is for firing pin protrusion, which is a function of design. The primer
sensitivity of each type of ammo cannot be provided, and will vary between ammo types and
caliber.
88. Is there a required Suppressor service life?
RESPONSE: No, the suppressor requirement is only to show that a suppressor can be used on
this weapon.
89. Could the notification be extended to a minimum of 30 days? This is mandatory for foreign
companies to obtain clearances through the official channel. Same for clause C.3.2.3.1.2. (PMR).
RESPONSE: Yes, if necessary.
90. In accordance with DI-SAFT-80102 (CDRL A002): Noted and agreed but will the US Government
accept Contractor format?
RESPONSE: Yes, contractor format is acceptable.

91. In accordance with DI-MISC-80914B (CDRL A004): Please provide additional information on DI-
MISC-80914B (CDRL A004) as it is unknown to us and needs to be analyzed.
RESPONSE: The DID is available online via the ASSIST website.
92. Complete section agreed but ISO 9001:2000 has been replaced by ISO 9001:2008 wherever
noted, also shown in C.2.2. Will the US Government accept the ISO 9001:2008 certification?
RESPONSE: SOW states ISO 9001:2000 or equivalent.
93. Please define Lot Acceptance Testing in terms of quantities of systems, etc.
RESPONSE: Lot Acceptance Testing is called out under the AR-PD-173 as Conformance
Inspection. Information can be found in AR-PD-173, under paragraph 3.3, 4.4, and Table 2.
94. Will the US Government accept the contractor format for the ECP in accordance with DI-CMAN-
80639C (CDRL A015) and RFD in accordance with DI-CMAN-80640C (CDRL A016): In addition, will
the US Government accept the Contractor format as practiced where Fit, Format, Reliability,
Interchangeability and Safety (FFRIS) is affected?
RESPONSE: The DD1423 CDRLs will be provided in the final RFP, which will contain formatting
requirements.
95. For the avoidance of doubt, could USG clarify what it understands by "unlimited rights for data
related to form, fit, function, operation and maintenance" and how it articulates with Limited
Rights / Government Purpose Rights restrictions?
RESPONSE: The USG requires unlimited rights to all data, copy rights, proprietary data for use
internal to the Government (i.e. development of Technical Manuals, training, etc.) IAW DFARS
252.227-7013(a)(13) and (b)(3). The GPR shall be negotiated between the Offeror and the USG,
for the purposes of competing future requirements.
96. The pre-solicitation is listing the concepts of non-firing carbines and cut-away carbines. How is
this articulated with the first article requirements (are they separate and in addition to, are they
part of it, else)?
RESPONSE: First Article will not be conducted on non-firing carbines. These carbines are to be
utilized for training and demonstration purposes only. The non-firing carbines should function
sufficiently well so that they can be used for training purposes.
97. Current COTS assault rifles do not have markings on each major component/assembly. Please
provide the rationale for such a performance requirement. Industry standard normally only
requires compliance with ATF regulations.
RESPONSE: Agree, the verbiage will be updated in the final RFP.

98. The marking requirements appear necessary for production and delivery of weapon systems to
the US Government, but not for the initial bid samples for phase 1. Please clarify.
RESPONSE: Initial submissions will have to comply with ATF regulations and UID markings as
specified in RFP. Contract submissions are required to comply with SOW.
99. Is there a specific desire for distance between selector modes and/or the relative position of
them (i.e. 180 degree total selector lever throw, 45 degrees between modes)?
RESPONSE: No.
100. Please confirm that unit level refers to an Armorer, as opposed to an operator?
RESPONSE: Unit level refers to Armorer, the RFP will be updated to reflect.
101. What is the desired dB reduction when firing suppressed vs. unsuppressed; or, what is the
desired dB limit while firing suppressed?
RESPONSE: The 140db is the objective for unsuppressed.
102. What is the firing schedule and required service life for the IC equipped with the Suppressor?
RESPONSE: The requirement is to determine if the weapon will function with the suppressor.
103. Please clarify if 3.4.12 refers to part life.
RESPONSE: IC with BFA attached is required to fire 12,000 blank rounds.
104. Is BFA Safety an objective or threshold requirement?
RESPONSE: An objective.
105. Please define "enablers."
RESPONSE: Enablers are sights, lights, and lethality attachments.
106. Will the weight requirement be adjusted to accommodate a caliber modular weapon, larger
than 5.56mm?
RESPONSE: No. The weight requirement addresses soldier mobility and capability and will not
be changed.
107. The weight of the weapon is based on a full magazine with a magazine capacity that is
unspecified. This causes an inconsistency between competitors using different size magazine
capacities. Please specify the weight of the weapon without the magazine.
RESPONSE: The requirement regarding weight is currently being reviewed. Updates will be
specified in the revised Purchase Description (AR-PD-173).
108. Market research reveals that the majority of current COTS assault rifles have an overall (stock
fully extended) length of greater than 34 inches but less than 36 inches. Overall length should
not be restricted to 34 inches so long as the "stock in shortest/stowed configuration" length is
met. Additional length with the stock fully extended ensures that the 5th to 95th percentile of
operators will be able to utilize the weapon.
RESPONSE: The requirement regarding length is currently being reviewed. Updates will be
109. Can the overall length "with stock fully extended" be increased?
110. Can a provision be made to the "stock in shortest/stowed configuration" threshold to account
for foldable stocks, which are expected to further shorten the overall length of the weapon?
111. Define employ as it relates to a folding buttstock.
RESPONSE: Paragraph 3.5.2 does not include the word employ.
112. Please define "pose a hazard."
RESPONSE: Shall not injure the individual.
113. Is the precision match trigger group requirement to work both in full auto and semi auto firing
modes?
RESPONSE: The additional precision match trigger is for semi-automatic, but full auto must still
function.
114. The Purchase Description does not describe if requirement of 140 db is with suppressor or not.
RESPONSE: The requirement for 140db is the objective without a suppressor.
115. What is the corresponding sound pressure level for the M4?
RESPONSE: Weapons will be assessed against the purchase description requirements, which are
being revised.
116. If the Objective requirement is met, must the Threshold requirement for removable mounting
surface below the barrel also be met?
RESPONSE: No, if the objective requirement is met, it supersedes the requirement for a
removable lower mounting surface.
117. Is there a requirement for under barrel accessories/modules to be utilized/fired with the M9
bayonet attached?
RESPONSE: No.
118. The IC objective requirement of a 5 inch extreme spread at 300 m correlates to a 1.46 MOA
extreme spread. It appears the objective requirement is not achievable with M855A1
ammunition (3.3 MOA in a test barrel). In addition, the objective requirement seems 3 times
more severe than the threshold. Please confirm that this is, in fact, the correct interpretation of
the requirements.
RESPONSE: Per AR-PD-173, paragraph 3.4.1 b - c, the objective requirement is a 90% probability
of not greater than 5" extreme spread when firing at 300 meters and 90% probability of not
greater than 10" extreme spread when firing at 600 meters.
119. Define "General Purpose Ammunition" as used throughout the entire solicitation.
RESPONSE: General Purpose Ammunition refers to ball ammunition.
120. What specific ammunition will be used for each performance test?
RESPONSE: General purpose (ball ammunition) in the Offeror’s caliber unless otherwise stated.
121. Can we modify Drawing #11837943 hard mount, to verify accuracy performance of the weapon?
RESPONSE: USG Test center is building a universal mount with custom fit molded inserts to
accommodate each unique weapon.
122. Please clarify the specific parameters to determine System Accuracy/Dispersion for 3.4.1. is
there an ITOP/TOP reference?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. Methods of calculating measurements of accuracy and dispersion
are given in ITOP 4-2-829.
123. Will the USG supply a M4 for side by side testing as required in 3.4.2?
RESPONSE: No, the USG will not supply a M4 to the Offeror. However, the USG will utilize an
M4A1 for Government testing as required during this test.
124. Please clarify ammunition type used in section 3.4.12 of AR-PD-173.
RESPONSE: Blank ammunition.
125. What is the current "danger to the soldier of the M855 fired through the Blank Firing
Attachment, 5.56 MM, M23 on the Carbine, 5.56 Millimeter - M4?"
RESPONSE: The danger level of the M4 will be assessed during the side by side test with the IC
candidates. This will be done to ensure that the data is collected in the exact same manner and
under the exact same conditions.
126. What devise is the US Government using to measure the trigger pull value?
RESPONSE: Dvorak Trigger Scan
127. Which ammunition is used to measure the sound level as specified in 3.5.8?
RESPONSE: General Purpose (ball) ammunition.
128. Please clarify the attitude of the weapon while the stated 3-second drain time is completed.
RESPONSE: The current plan is to angle at 45 degrees muzzle down.
129. Is the weapon held generally parallel to the ground throughout the test? Or will the weapon be
canted/titled during the 3-second period?
RESPONSE: Canted muzzle down at approximately 45 degrees.
130. How is the weapon cleaned to ensure no lubrication, and will the US Army use solvents to
remove lubricants?
RESPONSE: The solvent used will be Breakthrough. After cleaning, weapon components are
dried in a dryer for 10-15 minutes at 110-130 degrees F.
131. If the reliability test is performed on a machine rest (§4.8.1.1), can we have a description and
drawing of the rest?
RESPONSE: The test center will use the Lahti bench rest mount for reliability testing. The
drawing is unavailable.
132. Is there a required firing schedule for Reliability testing?
RESPONSE: The firing schedule for reliability is provided in 4.8.1.1 of the PD.
133. What ammunition will the US Government use to conduct Reliability testing?
RESPONSE: General Purpose (Ball) ammunition. If chambered for NATO 5.56x45 mm, the
M855A1 will be used; if chambered for NATO 7.62x51mm ammunition then the M80 will be
used; if chambered for a non-standard caliber, the vendor provided General Purpose cartridge
will be used.
134. Are all of the 5.56mm rounds listed, qualified for the M4?
RESPONSE: Yes.
135. C.3.2.3.1.1. Page 20 of the original draft, Start of Work Meeting: Is the foreign parent company
of the U.S. seller and manufacturer of the IC considered a subcontractor under the terms of the
RFP?
RESPONSE: The Offeror is the prime. This question really depends on how the specific entity is
set up. By definition of a subcontractor, a contract must exist between the sub and the prime
and must furnish labor and or supplies to the prime in performance of a higher tier contract.
136. C.3.2.10.7., Provisioning Technical Data (PTD): At what point during the solicitation process are
the PTD and Interface Control Drawings (ICDS) required?
RESPONSE: Different detail levels of technical data are required at different times throughout
the contract. Refer to CDRLs for more specific information.
137. C.3.2.10.8. Page 29, Technical Data: At what point during the solicitation process are the digital
contractor format drawings and associated parts lists required?
RESPONSE: Different detail levels of technical data are required at different times throughout
the contract. Refer to CDRLs for more specific information.
138. Sustained Rate of Fire: What type of ammunition will be used to evaluate whether the weapon
meets the Sustained Rate of Fire requirement?
will be used.
139. Safety Mechanism: Is the required design/operation of the selector lever switchable/reversible
or ambidextrous?
RESPONSE: If the safety is switchable/reversible it is ambidextrous by default.
140. Suppressor Functionality: What type of ammunition will be used to evaluate whether the
weapon meets the Suppressor Functionality requirement?
RESPONSE: General Purpose Ammunition
141. Ambidextrous use: Is the required design/operation of the selector lever switchable/reversible
or ambidextrous?
RESPONSE: If it is switchable/reversible it therefore is ambidextrous by default.
142. Magazine: What is considered a special tool and what is considered a standard tool for the War-
fighter?
RESPONSE: Special tool" is defined as "A unique and/or new tool/device needed by the Soldier
for the weapon’s routine operator-level maintenance, cleaning, and field stripping” in 6.7 of AR-
PD-173. Standard tools carried by Warfigther consist of the those items contained in the
Improved Weapons Cleaning Kit, NSN 1005-01-562-7393.
143. Icing: How long will the IC be subjected to the Icing procedure and is the IC to be fired
immediately after the duration of the icing?
RESPONSE: See paragraph 4.7.15 of AR-PD-173 which includes the duration of test.
144. Wet Mud and Dried Mud: What is considered as the typical immediate action steps an operator
will perform when a weapon has been subjected to Wet or Dried Mud? How much time is
allotted for these actions?
RESPONSE: Per paragraph 4.7.1.7 & 4.7.1.8 of AR-PD-173, procedures of test can be found in
TOP 3-2-045.
145. Drop test: During the Drop test, with the impact point on the IC be random or designated to
specific locations on the IC?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. AR-PD-173 is being updated.
146. Transportation vibration: Will the tests be conducted under Mil-Std-810 or ISTA 1A procedures?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. AR-PD-173 is being updated.
147. Clothing Compatibility: How will the IC be positioned to perform the drop test, i.e. muzzle first,
side first, etc.
RESPONSE: Per AR-PD-173, paragraph 3.7.13 Clothing Compatibility has nothing to do with drop
testing. Clothing compatibility verification is found in 4.8.13 of AR-PD-173. In addition, as stated
above orientations for drop test can be found in TOP 3-2-045. AR-PD-173 is being updated.
148. Firing Modes: “Hyper Burst” is requested as an Objective Requirement for the IC. What is the
required accuracy (burst dispersion) on target in inches and at what range? (i.e. all rounds within
a 2 inch tile at 25 meters).
RESPONSE: AR-PD-173 has no accuracy requirement for this. Having the function will suffice.
149. Ambidextrous Controls: Please define “All controls”. Does that include the forward assist,
cocking handle, bolt catch/release (if applicable) as well as the safety/selector lever and
magazine release?
RESPONSE: Yes.
150. Non-standard Grenade: Please define what a “non-standard grenade launcher” is by make(s)
and model(s) as each would likely have a different mounting interface, recoil impulse and
functional controls, all of which would/may interfere with the IC candidate operation, and
possibly VAS device attachment.
RESPONSE: Per paragraph 3.5.20 of AR-PD-173, a 40 millimeter Grenade Launcher with

capabilities comparable to the M203A2 and/or M320A1 Grenade Launchers is required as a
threshold. Therefore, the "Non-standard grenade launcher" refers to any 40 millimeter grenade
launcher not Type Classified by the Army.
151. Submersion: For this requirement is this test conducted with the bolt open (locked to the rear)
or with the bolt forward (closed on the chamber) when the weapon is immersed in the water?
The end results in an obstructed bore firing incident are woefully different in either condition
(due to the absence or presence of an air bubble in the bore). I would recommend conducting
the test twice in both conditions.
RESPONSE: It will be immersed in the ready to fire condition.
152. Drop Test: What capacity magazine and/or how many cartridges are to be included in the
weapon during this test?
RESPONSE: Capacity size for the magazine is not stipulated. Para 4.7.2.1 entitled Drop test,
states that a loaded magazine at full capacity will be used in the test.
153. Ammunition Support Package: If a bidder submits an IC candidate in a caliber other than
5.56mm NATO or 7.62mm NATO, must he/she submit all nine (9) of the cartridge types listed in
this section with the proposal samples?
RESPONSE: No, per the draft RFP section L, paragraph L.2.3.1.m, 86,000 rounds of general
purpose ammunition (i.e. ball), 1,200 rounds of AP, 12 HPT rounds (if not already proofed), and
264 rounds of blank ammunition are required for Phase II evaluation. However, for down-select,
all nine (9) cartridges will be required IAW contract, which will be purchased from the Offeror by
the Government.
154. Ammunition Support Package: If one or more of the cartridge types are still in development at
the time of proposal submission, can these be delivered at a time specified later when available?
RESPONSE: Ball, armor piercing, high pressure test (if applicable), and blank ammunition are
required to be submitted with non-standard caliber bid sample submissions at no cost to the
Government to be used for Phase II evaluation. HOWEVER, all nine (9) are required for entrance
into down-select IAW contract.
155. Why would the US Army exclude an IC candidate because insufficient spare parts were
provided to complete testing?
RESPONSE: Not providing sufficient parts prior the bid sample testing could potentially cause
delays and costs not forecasted in the testing schedule. It is the contractors responsibility to
forecast and provide a sufficient amount of spare parts and replacement barrels based on the
testing described. Contractors should have a reasonable idea of the reliability of their IC
candidate & spare parts. Contractors should be reminded that they will not be penalized for
extra spare parts.
156. Merit for Modularity and IC Variants: Will special consideration or merit be afforded proposals
and candidates that offer the following modularity and variants?
RESPONSE: Modularity is not a part of the requirement.
157. Merit for Modularity and IC Variants
A. Caliber Modularity (conversion from one caliber to another by the operator without
special tools).
B. Barrel Length Modularity (barrel exchange by the operator without special tools).
C. Buttstock Modularity (the ability to remove or exchange buttstock styles by the operator
without tools to; no buttstock (i.e. butt cap only), sliding/retractable/collapsible buttstock,
folding buttstock and/or sniper/DM buttstock options).
D. Feed System Modularity (the ability to exchange the feed system/feed source/feed chute
by the operator without tools to allow firing from box magazines, to drum magazines, to
belted ammunition and/or to alternative calibers).
RESPONSE: Modularity is not a part of the requirement.
158. Are adjustments allowed by the user to the carbine to accommodate different types of
ammunition?
RESPONSE: No adjustments will be allowed during testing.
159. Cost/Price – Government Owned and Research Property: Does this section apply to teaming
agreements pursuant to partnership authority granted by the 10 U.S.C. §2474 (Centers of
Industrial and Technical Excellence: designation; public-private partnerships)?
RESPONSE: Yes. In accordance with FAR 45.202(a), the Government shall consider any
potentially unfair competitive advantage that may result from an Offeror using Government
property. To eliminate the competitive advantage, a rental equivalent evaluation factor shall be
added to each offer which is predicated on the use of Government property.
160. Could the Government be more specific about the desired configuration of the rail, specifically
whether the rails on the 3, 6 and 9 o’clock positions can be user configurable or must be a
permanent and integral part of the rail tube? To clarify this means the user could reconfigure the
rail tube with modular Picatinny sections at the Unit Level, omitting sections where Picatinny rails
are not required or placing different length sections as required.
RESPONSE: The Government is not specifying whether removable or permanent rails are
required.
161. What is meant by detection with EO/IR sensor systems? Is IR detection measured before firing
or after a firing sequence? If before, what would the firing sequence be?
RESPONSE: The IR signature will be measured before firing.
162. Phase II: Which ammunition will be used in this test? Specifically M855, M855A1, MK262,
MK318, M193? How many rounds are fired for each grouping in the accuracy/dispersion test?
will be used. Current plan for round count is 5 round groups x 3 targets x 3 separate ranges.
163. Which ammunition will be used for the reliability test? Is one type, or several types?
will be used.
164. At what range (distance) will the dispersion testing be to measure barrel life? It is not specified
in the draft.
RESPONSE: Dispersion will be tested at 300 meters. Additional information can be obtained
from paragraph 4.5.1 of AR-PD-173.
165. Why are MRBEFF requirements different as stated in the Phase III testing, than in Phase II,
Factor 1, Sub-Factor 1, Reliability?
RESPONSE: The reliability requirement remains the same for all testing, however because a
different number of weapons and a different amount of rounds are fired for Phase II (testing
scaled down) the accept/reject criteria for each phase are different. All accept/reject criteria are
determined using the Chi-square formula, and are derived using the constant MRBEFF
requirement.
166. What are the parameters for thermal shock testing? Starting temperature? Cools down to what
temperature? Rate of cooling?
RESPONSE: IAW MIL-STD 810G. After four hours at -65F the weapon is removed and within one
minute placed in a preconditioned chamber of 160F. The process is repeated until the item is
exposed to each temperature three times.
167. What is the intensity and time of exposure for which the temperatures are recorded?
168. What is the height of drop testing? What will the IC be dropped on?
RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045. 1.5 meter on a clean, level, concrete surface.
169. What is fouling?

RESPONSE: Excessive Carbon build-up resulting in a failure.
170. Fouling: Is the weapon induced via operation with ammo or combined with ambient
contaminants?
RESPONSE: Both.
171. What are the details and parameters of each of these tests?
RESPONSE: See AR-PD-173, Section 4 for testing information on the items listed.
172. How many rounds are to be fired from grenade launcher and M26?
RESPONSE: Using three IC candidate weapons from each vendor; M320, 50 rounds per weapon;
M26, 75 rounds per weapon.
173. What is the connection of the future individual carbine with the US future soldier programs ?
RESPONSE: The Individual Carbine Program is a standalone program.
174. What will the criteria be for caliber selection?
RESPONSE: Testing and evaluation results of the carbines in accordance with the RFP will decide
what carbine and caliber is the best value to the Government. Contractors are to provide their
submission assembled in the caliber/configuration they want to be evaluated.
175. If the Carbine offering is capable of firing more than one caliber (i.e. NATO 9mm), will that
caliber be tested as well?
RESPONSE: No. Contractors are to provide their submission assembled in the

caliber/configuration they want to be evaluated. Vendors are required to submit only one
candidate. It is up to the vendor to determine which caliber their candidate needs to be in order
to meet the requirements.
176. If the above is the case, to what standard would the additional caliber be tested to, and what
are the requirements for testing? Quantity Samples of rifles, or conversions for the RFI testing
submission? Should we anticipate offering an additional MANN Barrel for testing chambered
appropriately? In addition will a specification for the barrel be supplied?
RESPONSE: Offerors are to submit the carbine in the assembled caliber/configuration they feel
best meets the RFP requirements. No additional testing for other calibers will be conducted on
their submissions.
177. Will the Government test an optical system other than US Army optics? If the Optics are not
exactly as US Army Spec, should we supply the carbines bare?
RESPONSE: If the weapon is not compatible with US Army optics, each vendor should submit
sights with the weapons as outlined in AR-PD-173 (3.4.4.1 & 3.4.4.2) and in accordance with
section L.2.1 of the draft RFP.
178. Purchase Description: Are the requirements in the Purchase Description of equal importance to
the Government or are some requirements Key Performance Parameters that are more heavily
weighed than others?
RESPONSE: The USG will not identify KPPs, however the relative order of importance has been
updated.
179. PD 3.4.11: Request the Government provide the methodology in measuring recoil.
RESPONSE: The test methodology is provided in TOP 3-2-045, as stated in 4.5.11 in AR-PD-173.
180. Offerors are currently required by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), in
accordance with statute §478.92, to mark both the serial number and the phrase "RESTRICTED
LAW ENFORCEMENT/GOVERNMENT USE ONLY" on the receiver, while the model number,
caliber, manufacturer's name, and the manufacturer's location must be marked either on the
barrel or the receiver. RFP L.2.3.1 requires submission of bid samples without any markings and
will therefore require an individual ATF variance for each vendor with unpredictable lead times
for approval. Recommend the Government submit a blanket variance to the ATF for all
competitors or drop this requirement entirely.
RESPONSE: The Government is reconsidering this requirement. The final RFP will reflect the
revisions.
181. While the Government clearly states that it is evaluating the unit and Government purchase
rights (GPR) costs of the Individual Carbine, there is no provision or methodology for the
Government to evaluate lifecycle cost. Life cycle cost has been a significant evaluation criteria in
recent large DoD procurements and can represent a decisive improvement over a legacy system.
Replacement intervals and costs of major subcomponents will vary greatly between different
types of carbines.
RESPONSE: The evaluation of the cost proposal will not include the Life-Cycle Cost. The cost
factor, however, will consider spare parts replacement based on the spare parts list as part of the
cost evaluation. The complete methodology that will be used to determine the evaluated price
for the spare parts list will be contained in the cost volume sections of the RFP. In addition, the
RFP will not contain a separate factor for life-cycle cost. The updated RFP contains a factor
entitled “Fielding, Operational and Supportability Impacts” which evaluates impact drivers for the
Offeror’s proposed carbine that will receive a rating.
182. It is unclear in RFP Section L.2.3.2.3.e if Offerors are constrained to pricing the Individual
Carbine Government Purchase Rights (GPR) to the options listed (pricing GPR via a royalty,
minimum units to be purchased, or a lump sum license fee). Will other innovative or alternative
approaches besides these three options be considered?
RESPONSE: The words "or alternative approach: has been added to the end of the sentence.
Offerors are not constrained to the options listed - all proposals will be considered.
183. PD 3.7.16.c: Section 3.7.16.c in the Purchase Description requires every major
component/assembly be marked with CAGE code, caliber, and model number. Offerors are
currently required by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), in accordance with
statute §478.92, to mark both the serial number and the phrase "RESTRICTED LAW
ENFORCEMENT/GOVERNMENT USE ONLY" on the receiver, while the model number, caliber,
manufacturer's name, and the manufacturer's location must be marked either on the barrel or
the receiver. What constitutes a "major component/assembly" item that must be marked with
CAGE code, model number, and caliber? Are the current ATF marking requirements sufficient to
meet this requirement?
RESPONSE: ATF markings are applicable. The RFP will be updated.
184. We have been unable to locate a vendor for Celetex would the Government provide vendor
information or is there an acceptable alternative to the Celetex?
RESPONSE: No, Celetex is a commercially available item.
185. C.3.2.10.3, page 26 of 122, and identifies MIL-HDBK-965 as guidance for the Parts Control
Program. This document has been canceled without replacement. Will the Government provide
current guidance and applicable documentation?
RESPONSE: The document has been provided as "reference for guidance" in the development of
the bidders proposed Parts Control Program. The use of MIL-HDBK-965 as a reference guide is
authorized. http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-HDBK/MIL-HDBK+(0800+-
+0999)/download.php?spec=MIL_HDBK_965.2013.pdf
186. Can the Government perform sand and dust testing during Phase I evaluation?
RESPONSE: No. Sand and Dust evaluation requires firing which will not be done in Phase I.
187. Would the Government consider changing the requirement for vendor/subcontractor
information in Volume III to require information only major/key subcontractors?
RESPONSE: Yes, this will be considered.
188. Will the Government clarify the requirements for Lot Acceptance Test and the number of lots
and guns per lot that must be tested?
RESPONSE: Lot acceptance is identified in the PD as "Conformance Inspection." The details are
listed in Table I of the PD (AR-PD-173). The required tests are called out in the "Conformance
Inspection" column.
189. For planning purposes, is it the intent of the Army to have a QAR in residence at the contractor’s
facility after contract award? If so, what are the special offices or IT requirements?
RESPONSE: It is not a requirement and will be dependent upon the DCMA Office.
190. Does the Government desire a uniform color for the carbine or can there be slight color
differences for each major component of the carbine?
RESPONSE: Yes, there can be slight variations in color.
191. Do the four total Class I & Class II failures apply to all three rifles in total for the sand and dust
testing (.074%) or is each rifle allowed four failures for an overall total of 12 malfunctions for the
entire test of 5,400 rounds (or .22%)? Please clarify.
RESPONSE: Overall total of four (4).
192. Will the Government identify what type of 12 gauge ammunition, shell size and projectile type
will be used for this test?
RESPONSE: Standard 2 3/4" #00 Buckshot, DODIC A011.
193. Will credit be given for a weapons system that minimizes impact upon existing training, logistics,
and supply network, and the existing ammunition supply chain?
RESPONSE: Yes. This will be evaluated under the Fielding Operational and Supportability Impact
factor in Phase II.
194. Is the charging handle and bolt stop of the current M4 Carbine considered ambidextrous?
RESPONSE: Charging Handle: Yes. However, the term “bolt stop” is not clear - if the question is
referring to the Bolt Forward Assist or the Bolt Catch/Release they are not considered
ambidextrous.
195. Intellectual Property Rights: Does the Government retain the right to purchase components or
complete carbines made to an Offeror’s TDP from other manufacturers? Is the Offeror free to
sell, within legal limits, similar products to the commercial market, or identical carbines to
international customers? Will the Army mix/match technology from various Offerors?
RESPONSE: The Government intends to seek GPR from the successful Offeror in order to obtain
technical data to conduct potential future competitive acquisitions for the IC and/or its
components. The USG takes no position on whether an Offeror can or should sell its product(s) to
commercial or international markets, subject to the Offeror’s legal ability to do so and
compliance with all applicable laws. The Army will not mix/match technology from different
Offerors.
196. Response content and due date: The solicitation states “Draft request for proposal…offerers are
directed to NOT submit proposals at this time.” What response is due July 30th? Is phase I
evaluation of physical characteristics accomplished via the draft request for proposal? What is
the expected time line of the different phases?
RESPONSE: This is a Draft RFP once the final RFP is issued, Offerors will have 90 days after to
submit a full proposal. The July 30th date on Proc-Net is an arbitrary date picked for this draft to
ensure the RFP number does not get archived before the USG issues the final RFP.
197. Does “Hyperburst” technology currently exist? Does duplex ammunition constitute Hyperburst?
Must the “Precision Match Trigger Group” also support select fire or “Hyperburst” capability?
RESPONSE: Yes-Hyper burst does exist in the market. Duplex ammo does not constitute
"Hyperburst. The Precision Match Trigger is required to support all firing modes.
198. Does “speedloading” refer to loading the magazine with cartridges or exchanging magazines in
the carbine?
RESPONSE: "Speedloading" refers to loading the magazine with cartridges.
199. What capacity magazine will be used to evaluate weight? Is recoil energy evaluated with a full or
empty magazine? Is there a limitation on magazine materials?
RESPONSE: The requirement regarding weight is currently being reviewed. Updates will be
specified in the revised Purchase Description (AR-PD-173). For recoil measurement it would be
empty. There is no limitation on magazine materials.
200. What firing schedule or cadence is used to evaluate barrel life?
RESPONSE: See 4.8.1 of AR-PD-173 for reliability firing schedule.
201. Will accuracy and changes in point of aim/point of impact be evaluated with a sling tensioned
vs. unattached?
RESPONSE: The sling is not part of the accuracy procedure.
202. Is this drop test applicable to the precision match-grade trigger group specified in SEC. 3.5.7.b
(pg.10)?
RESPONSE: Yes.
203. At what rate of fire do the 210 rounds have to be fired through the suppressor?
RESPONSE: Alternate magazines between semi auto and full auto. Semi-auto is 1 shot per
second, full auto is 3 round. Bursts at 85 shots per minute.
204. Can ANY of the IC's external small components be black in color (i.e. levers, trigger, rails, etc..)?
RESPONSE: All external parts and/or exterior surfaces must be non-black.
205. Considering that 3.5.6.b is an "Objective" requirement, what is admissible as a "Threshold" in

section 3.5.6.a.2? (There appears to be some redundancy in these two requirements).
RESPONSE: All requirements in 1.2 of AR-PD-173 that are not labeled with a "T" or "O" are
THRESHOLD requirements.
206. Does each attachment point need to be numbered or is every other one acceptable?
RESPONSE: The attachment points require numbered positions on all the surfaces.
207. What is the minimum length of side rails to accept these three laser devices?
RESPONSE: A minimum length has not been specified. Details on the mounting interface
requirement can be obtained from Paragraph 3.5.12 of the IC Purchase Description (AR-PD-173).
208. Will the bottom removable rail be considered part of the overall weight (max. 8 pounds) of the
IC?
RESPONSE: Yes, if removable and YES, if not removable.
209. How is "adversely affected" defined?
RESPONSE: Adversely affected means the coating shall remain intact without being damaged.
210. Clothing Compatibility: What type(s) of gloves will be used for testing? Please give enough
details/part numbers to be able to source on the market.
RESPONSE: The type of gloves used during testing is dependent on what the Soldier is issued.
The type of glove issued is dependent on where the Soldier is deploying to and what is issued at
the time of deployment. Below is a minimum list of gloves that Soldiers could potentially use
during Clothing Compatibility.
8415-01-F00-5712 GLOVES,FLYERS': CWF-FG-80W/ NOMEX M LRG/

8415-01-319-5115 GLOVE SHELL SIZE 4 BLACK
8415-01-527-4665 GLOVE INSRTS CLD SZ 4
8415-01-F00-0221 GLOVES COMBAT GRN M GREEN (Hard Knuckles)
8415-01-457-1557 GLOVES,COLD WEATHER
211. LUBRICATING COATINGS AND MATERIALS: What will the "analysis" mentioned here consist of?
RESPONSE: The analysis will simply be visual inspection during the normal firing cycle and the
Non-Destructive Testing interval, which is now Initial Inspection, at 6,000 rds, 12,000 rds, 18,000
rds, and Final Inspection. Visual inspection and documentation [ i.e., Test Incident Report (TIR)]
in the event of a stoppage.
212. BID SAMPLES - 10 rifles and 10 back-up sight systems are required. Does this mean that the 10
rifle bid samples do not need to have back-up sights? Will the back-up sights be considered part
of the overall weight (max. 8 pounds) of the IC?
RESPONSE: Per the RFP Offeror's are asked to provide ten (10) identical weapons and ten (10)
identical removable back-up sights. The removable back-up sights will not be considered part of
the overall weight (max 8 pounds) of the IC.
213. PHASE I, FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL, Sub-Factor 2: Compatibility: M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun
System: Please provide the interface drawing package to ensure a reliable fit with this accessory.
RESPONSE: The Government does not own the drawings for the M26. Offerors will be
evaluated in accordance with the criteria listed in section M for Accessory Compatibility.
214. Will the M855A1 be made available for test purposes prior to sample submission deadline?
RESPONSE: No. The Government previously made available the M855A1 available for vendors
through HP White Familiarization Shoot.
215. Why is the Government allowing vendors to submit an alternate Grenade Launcher as it offers a
competitive advantage to those with time and in some cases Government funding to not have to
integrate the current standard M320 grenade launcher that others must integrate? How will an
alternate grenade launcher be priced, evaluated and funded?
RESPONSE: The requirement per AR-PD-173 paragraph 3.5.20 is as follows, The IC shall be able
to mount a 40 mm Grenade Launcher with capabilities comparable to that of the M203A2 and/or
M320A1 Grenade Launchers. Additionally paragraph 3.5.20.1 states that In the event that the IC
is provided with a non-standard Grenade Launcher, the launcher shall meet all performance
requirements in AR-PD-154. B) With respect to pricing a non-standard grenade launcher will not
be separately priced. In regards to evaluation, it will be evaluated in accordance with AR-PD-173,
paragraph 4.6.20.1. Lastly the Individual Carbine program is funded.
216. Will the Army allow Lake City to sell M855A1 to potential vendors for the IC?
RESPONSE: No.
217. Will the Max Weight of 8lbs include: Bottom Removable Rail (3.5.12); Back-Up Sights (3.5.15);
Other interfaces for accessories (M26, M203, M320…)
RESPONSE: (1) Bottom Removable Rail - Yes; (2) Back-up Sight - No; and (3) Other interfaces for
accessories (M26, M203, M320) – No.
218. Other than as part of the evaluation of its Small Business Plan (if even in this regard), will an
Offeror proposing domestic production receive preferential rating compared to a foreign
producer and if so, how?
RESPONSE: As part of the Facility Capability factor, the Offeror's approach will be evaluated in
accordance with section M of the RFP to determine: facility capacity; sub-contractor/supplier
base; adequacy and feasibility of approach as it relates to expansion and relocation within the
U.S., which is desired.
219. The RFP only provides rating definitions. Request the Government reconsiders and provide a
more detailed evaluation description. For example what are the elements of requirements 1 - 4
of Sub-factor 4 (M.3.1.1.d) related to L.2.3.2 (a).
RESPONSE: The technical requirements for the IC are contained in the purchase description.
Offerors will receive ratings in accordance with section M.3.4 of the RFP.
220. There are new requirements and clarifications with RFP refinements. Will the Government
consider extending the 90 day submission requirements to allow Offerors time for additional
improvements and development?
RESPONSE: No. There are only clarification of existing requirements, no new requirements have
been added.
221. Is the drop test applicable to the match-grade trigger group specified in sec 3.5.7.b (pg 10).
RESPONSE: Yes.
222. What shot gun load will be used for the 75 round M26 Test?
RESPONSE: Standard 2 3/4" #00 Buckshot, DODIC A011.
223. Can vendors have access to M26, M203, M320 with 40mm TP and GFE 12 gauge rounds to
ensure our systems interface can withstand the recoil as per the IC compatibility testing (50 X
40mm and 75 X 12 gauge).
RESPONSE: The Government is currently investigating ways to make the M26, M203 and M320
weapons available for vendors to assess interface with their weapons through a Familiarization
Event. No ammunition will provided, and this will be a non-firing event. Ammunition will not be
made available by the USG.
224. Is there a written Acquisition Strategy approved by the Army Acquisition Executive? Is this
POM'd past RDT&E? Will it be considered an ACAT I, II, or III? Who is the Milestone Decision
Authority?
RESPONSE: A. Yes. B. Funding is available for the USG to purchase carbines. C. Program is
currently designated an ACAT II Program. D. MDA is the AAE.
225. Does the Government intend to provide KPPs and KSAs to industry or are all requirements of
position description of equal value?
RESPONSE: The Government will not identify KPPs or KSAs. All required information is contained
in the Purchase Description. Where applicable, relative importance will be detailed in the final
RFP.
226. Are the "Evaluation Methodology" criteria from the original draft for significant strength,
strength, etc. no longer valid?
RESPONSE: It is no longer applicable. Offerors will be evaluated IAW Sec M of the RFP.
227. Clarification on required ambidextrous controls: 1-Bolt Release (Yes or No); 2-Charging Handle
(Yes or No); 3-Mag Release (Yes or No); 4-Selector (Yes or No)? Please provide Yes or No.
RESPONSE: 1. Yes; 2. Yes; 3. Yes; 4. Yes.
228. Our barrel manufacturing process will not allow us to meet the outer diameter specifications for
the Mann Barrel receiver. Can we adapt "i.e. sleeve" the barrel to achieve the outer diameter
requirement.
RESPONSE: As long as this meets the outer diameter specification and is safe to fire.
229. If the overall length requirement is met with the stock collapsed, can the overall length with the
stock fully extended exceed the overall length requirement?
230. Question: In section 4.8.1.1 of the Purchase Description, it states that “all firing shall be done
from a machine rest.” Request the Government provide Offerors with the drawing(s) or
specification(s) for the standard machine rest(s) that will be used for testing carbines in all areas.
RESPONSE: For reliability testing, the test center will use the Lahti bench rest mount. Drawings
for the Lahti mount are not available. For accuracy testing, the test center will use a base
universal mount for all weapons that will be customized to accommodate the butt stock, hand
grip, etc. for each individual weapon.
231. What is the endurance/reliability firing schedule for unsuppressed and suppressed firing.
RESPONSE: Reliability testing will be done only on unsuppressed weapons. This information is
found in the Purchase Description paragraph 4.8.1.1.
232. Please clarify that the unsuppressed weapon needs to be hearing safe (140db). For testing
where is this measurement taken?
RESPONSE: A. No. However, 140db is the objective w/o suppressor. B. The measurement will
be conducted per the PD. Threshold is single hearing protection.
233. There are a number of requirements, many quite substantial, that apply to the statement of
work. If the Government intends to challenge industry to meet these requirements for a
program of this magnitude/importance, shouldn't it stand to reason to allow industry more than
90 days for submission of their proposals?
RESPONSE: The US Government seeks an NDI Solution. The Draft RFP was released 31 January.
Final submissions are due 90 days after final RFP, effectively allowing seven (7) months of prior to
submission of bid samples.
234. Are the sling, sling attachments and the Back-up sights considered part of the overall weight
requirement? Are the sling, sling attachments, and back up sights considered enablers?
RESPONSE: The sling and back up sight are not considered part of the weapon weight. However,
if the sling attachments are not removable by the user, then yes, it will be considered a part of
the weapon weight. Slings and backup sights are enablers.
235. Color-Are all of the components and gun required to be non-black, example controls, barrels,
muzzle break?
RESPONSE: All external parts and/or exterior surfaces must be non-black.
236. Para 2 says "any subcontractor" must be pre-approved for safety by DSS. Does this include non-
critical or non-controlled items suppliers of such parts as screws, washers, paint, springs, etc. We
suggest controlled item suppliers only.
RESPONSE: First we think the question was meant to say security instead of safety, and as such,
the answer is No, non-critical and non-controlled items suppliers of such parts as screws,
washers, paint, springs, etc. will not be required to be pre-approved by DSS. However, the RFP
will be reviewed and revised accordingly for further clarification.
237. On one hand you say that proposals won't be graded on Life-Cycle Cost? On the other hand you
say that credit will be given for compatibility with existing training logistics and supply chains?
RESPONSE: The answer is no, lifecycle cost is not a separate factor. The Fielding, Operational,
and Supportability factor will evaluate impact drivers of the proposed carbine in accordance with
section M. However we agree clarifications are necessary. This section will be reviewed for
further clarification.
238. Can the precision trigger be a two stage trigger?
RESPONSE: No.
239. a. The main trigger is a single stage b. Match trigger does not specify single or two stage.
RESPONSE: A. Yes; B. Single stage.
240. Is a single stage trigger preferred for the IC precision trigger group?
RESPONSE: Yes.
241. Is the precision trigger group cost part of the IC overall base gun/unit cost and price to the
Government?
RESPONSE: The requirement is being re-evaluated.
242. Is the silencer cost part of the IC overall base gun/unit cost and price to the Government?
RESPONSE: No. The Offeror is providing one suppressor so that the USG can test compatibility
with a suppressor. No suppressors will be purchased under this contract.
243. Is the cleaning kit part of the IC overall base gun/unit cost and price to the Government?
RESPONSE: Yes. Because the USG does not know which IC candidate will be selected, the intent
is to purchase cleaning kits with the IC. If however, the current M4 cleaning kit is compatible
with the selected IC, it is likely that the USG will not purchase cleaning kits with the IC. This
change would need to be initiated via an ECP and contract mod.
244. Is the sling part of the IC overall base gun/unit cost and price to the Government?
RESPONSE: Yes. Because the USG does not know which IC candidate will be selected, the intent
is to purchase slings with the IC. If however the current M4 sling is compatible with the selected
IC, it is likely that the USG will not purchase slings with the IC. This change would need to be
initiated via an ECP and contract mod.
245. Pg. 46/119 of the DRFP outlines the delivery schedule. There is some ambiguity regarding small
quantity orders and how they are to be delivered. Specifically it is stated that orders of
magnitude will be afforded 30 days for delivery of the FAT with an additional 60 days to deliver
the first months deliver. It also states that orders less than 2000 shall be delivered within 30 days
from the date of order. Please clarify.
RESPONSE: The language in the RFP is provided to let contractors know that Actual Delivery
schedules will be determined when the delivery order is placed. It also alerts the contractor that
the contractor must begin initial full rate production (FRP) deliveries 60 days after First Article
approval. In addition, contractor’s must be capable of meeting minimum requirements of 2000
per month and up to 4,200 per month during FRP. For clarity, if an order is placed for a quantity
less than the minimum delivery requirement (2000 per/mo) or more than the maximum delivery
requirement (4,200 per/mo), the contractor is expected to deliver IAW the RFP delivery
requirements. All orders will be delivered in sequence to the delivery schedule of previous
placed orders. Revisions to clarify this paragraph are likely in the final RFP.
246. Is it the Government’s intent to place orders to a start /stop scenario?
RESPONSE: The Government’s requirement is to purchase the maximum quantity of ICs within
the period of performance of the contract dependent upon funding and the price of the carbine.
It is not the USG’s intention to create a start/stop scenario with each order.

US Army IC Q&amp;A18 APR 2011

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

US Army IC Q&amp;A18 APR 2011

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

DRAFT RFP Questions from Industry and Government Responses as 4/18/2011

Final RFP, once issued, shall supersede any previous response

3. Can you provide the full list of CDRLs?

RESPONSE: No provisions for progress payments will be provided.

RESPONSE: This clause has been removed.

8. RESPONSE: No Flexibility exists. All weapons submitted must be capable of performing

RESPONSE: Draft RFP: Jan 2011

RESPONSE: There will be no additional tests.

13. Please clarify the definition of “Offeror’s facility.”

RESPONSE: The Offeror’s facility is where the proposed IC will be manufactured.

RESPONSE: This is only applicable to contractor employees working on Picatinny Arsenal.

17. Can the Government provide its best estimate for:

Please note these are all estimates.

by providing all of the necessary interfaces/adapters?

22. Please specify what is the Ph / Pi of the M4/M4A1 carbines.

23. By “ hyper-burst “, do you mean controlled burst?

25. What is meant by “touch” when referring to safety check?

RESPONSE: Touch is defined as to "feel by hand."

26. Please identify danger level of M4.

27. Can you better define the color “taupe”?

RESPONSE: The requirement did not specify a specific color code.

RESPONSE: This requirement is the objective requirement WITHOUT the suppressor/silencer.

RESPONSE: IC system accuracy (technical measurement of dispersion) shall be 5-inch mean

A rail cover/hand-guard is not required.

RESPONSE: See paragraph 3.5.9 of the Purchase Description (AR-PD-173).

44. What organizations will be represented on the Source Selection Board.

RESPONSE: The information requested is internal to the Government.

RESPONSE: No statutory requirement exists. Therefore, it is desired not required.

46. Is the charging handle considered to be one of the weapon “controls?”

RESPONSE: These are from the requirements document.

48. Is the charging handle on the currently fielded IC considered “ambidextrous?”

RESPONSE: There are no currently fielded ICs.

50. High Temperature? Same as Low Temperature question.

51. Is chrome lined barrel considered an environmental pollutant?

52. When are these MPI inspections to be performed?

RESPONSE: Non-Destructive Testing conducted in Initial Inspection, at intervals of 6,000,

53. What are the Thermal Shock test protocols?

RESPONSE: Thermal Shock Testing will be conducted IAW MIL-STD 810G.

54. What temperatures will the weapon be heated to?

55. Is the “shock” a sudden accelerated cooling?

56. What temperature will the weapon be “shocked” to?

57. Define Abrasion?

58. What abrasive material will be used?

RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045 Sand and Dust compound.

59. What are the Transportation Vibration test protocols?

RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045.

61. Is the Dust test a blowing or settling test?

62. What are the Mud, Ice test protocols?

RESPONSE: IAW TOP 3-2-045.

63. What are the toxins being tested for?

64. Is exposure to lead dust from either of the “ammunitions” a concern?

RESPONSE: Yes. Test center will analyze samples.

65. What is considered “fouling?”

RESPONSE: Excessive Carbon build-up resulting in a failure.

RESPONSE: CDRLS will be included in the Final RFP.

69. Is the probability of incapacitation based on the performance of the M855A1?

RESPONSE: This data will not be provided.

RESPONSE: The Government is currently examining the possibility of providing a non-firing

RESPONSE: The Government is currently examining the options of providing a non-firing

88. Is there a required Suppressor service life?

RESPONSE: Yes, if necessary.

RESPONSE: Yes, contractor format is acceptable.

RESPONSE: The DID is available online via the ASSIST website.

US Army IC Q&A18 APR 2011

US Army IC Q&A18 APR 2011