MD width> crown height : it shares this feature with deci. Max. central incisor
Labial or lingual views: diamond in shape : if we look at this tooth from occlusal view the tooth
has diamond shape,also buccal & lingual view also the tooth looks like the shape of diamond.
This makes the mesial and distal HOC located as a mid portion of the crown, this makes the
mesial n distal sloping ridges of the cusp similarly to the mesial n distal outline ya3ni bringing
the tooth to shape like diamond
M & D profiles overhang root’s outline ; located outside the root’s outline ,same with max. deci.
Cent. Incisor
HOCs are much near the cervix than in permanent : permanent canine, located incisally,
deciduous closer to cervical line nearly in the middle of the crown
Labial & lingual cervical 1/3s are markedly convex : labial n lingual are very convex and have
very great constriction at the neck of tooth
No labial ridges and depression : labial surface is flat. Don’t have any labial ridges or depression
not like permanent max. canine
Labial or lingual aspects: arrow in shape : looks like arrow when we look from labial aspect not
like diamond, if its like diamond max. deci. canine
No labial ridge or grooves
HOCs are much near the cervix than in permanent : are closer to the cervix than the permanent
canine, but it’s HOC is closer to the cusp than the dec. maxillary canine.
LL diameter < that of deciduous max. canine : LL width is wider than LL of deci. Max. canine
Less prominent cingulum or MRs & shallower fossae than in deciduous max. canine
Intermediate between a premolar & a molar : it is someway intermediate between premolar and
molar.
Smallest molar in all but BL diameter : every dimension is the smallest except the BL diameter.
The BL diameter is not the smallest diameter here but the other aspect has the smallest diameter
compared to other molars.
• A small DB cusp is frequently present on the D cusp ridge of the MB cusp : not a proper
cusp because they are very small so not classified as cusps located distal to MB cusp.
Buccal aspect
- MD diameter >> crown height : MD diameter is Much2 greater than the crown
height, ya3ni the width of crown is greater than height of the crown,
- M part is higher OCly than D because it is more projected cervically onto the root
area : because the cervical line is more projected towards the root in the mesial ½ of
crown this make the mesial part wider than D part of the crown from the buccal
aspect.
*Successor tooth that lives between the roots : permanent max. 1st premolar*
Mesial aspect
- Mesial marginal groove : we have mesial marginal ridge groove. Not clear here.
- B HOC is more cervically located than L : B HOC is near the cervical of crown and lingual
HOC usually located at the middle of the crown
-Buccal cervical ridge is more prominent in 1st molars than in 2nd’
Summary :
The tooth is atypical. Many students finds it’s hard to differentiates the teeth.
Generally, is looks like premolar but it also looks like molar, but it has two big
cusp and two small cusp. The 2 big cusp is located at the mesial side. MB n MD
cusp. We have very small DB cusp and often we don’t have any DL cusp.
o Morphologically considered a model for the permanent 1st maxillary molar : this
tooth exactly looks like the that erupts behind it. What is the tooth? Permanent
Max. 1st molar. To differentiates between them is to use only the set traits. The
similarity btwn the anatomy is called isomorphy. The tooth look alike. but the tooth
is not like the tooth that replace it.
o Allows prediction of what the 1st maxillary molar will look like.: example: if a
4years old child has problem at the 2nd deci. Molar, I will aspect there will be the
same problem at the parm. 1st max molar when it is erupted.. and another example.
If the 2nd deci max molar has a very prominent cusps of carebelli, the 1st parm. max
molar will also have the same prominent cusps of carebelli.
o This concordance is called isomorphy
Set traits
o Cervical constriction
o Cervical 1/3 bulging
o Little root trunk
o Roots thinner & divergent
Other than this the teeth(max. 2nd deci. Molar n max 1st parm. Molar) looks
really alike
MANDIBULAR 1ST MOLAR
Molariform unlike max. 1st : looks more like molar rather than the max. 1st molar
4-cusped tooth : it has 4 cusps. So it looks more like molar. But at max 1st it looks
atypical(doesn’t look like premolar ot molar).
Buccal aspect
Lingual aspect
Mesial aspect
o Buccal cervical ridge (BCR): we can see the buccal cervical ridge form the
mesial aspect which is very prominent
o From MB cusp tip a straight incline to BCR: the tip of the MB cusp to the
buccal cervical ridge is straight incline
o Transverse ridge connecting MB & ML cusps
o Mesial Marginal Ridge is high & prominent
o Mesial marginal groove separates Mesial Marginal Ridge from
MesioLingual cusp ridge
o Cervical Line is convex occlusally and lower on the buccal end : at the
buccal end it is very low because it has to be consistenr to connect with the
buccal which is very low
o Root :
Extremely broad BL (sometimes as broad as the crown) :sometime
the root is as wide as the width of the crown
Frequently bifid apex : like spine process of 7th cervical vertebra
Distal aspect
o All 4 cusps & M root profiles are visible : we can see all the 4 cusps
because the distal cusps is smaller than the mesial cusps
o B profile is less bulging than from mesial aspect : mesial aspect is much
bulging as we see at the tooth
o Distal Marginal Ridge is lower and less prominent than Mesial Marginal
Ridge
o CL is more straight & horizontal than that of Mesial aspect
Occlusal aspect