(1) water
(2) cement
(3) carbon
(4) zinc
(3)
Answer(s): ____________ (if (3) is selected as the correct answer to 1.0)
Answer(s): _____(3)______
1.3 In the design calculations of reinforced concrete structures, concrete strength is taken
as it’s
(1) Actual tested strength
(2) Specific Mean strength
(3) Characteristic strength
(4) The value of concrete strength, which is exceeded by 95% of the standard cube test
results.
(1) In ultimate strength design method, the ultimate loads are enhanced by an
appropriate load factor
(2) In working stress design method, allowable material stresses are their ultimate
strengths divided by a safety factor.
(3) Limit state design in effect compasses both working stress and ultimate strength
design methods.
(4) BS 8110 is based on ultimate strength design method
Answer(s): ____(4)______
1.5 Serviceability limit state concerns the behaviour of structures under service loads. In a
common building structure, this is associated with
1.6 Which of the following will NOT be the consequence of allowing redistribution of
moment in the design of a structural element?
2. Being a structural engineer in an engineering design office, you are asked to design a
typical internal rectangular beam for a parking lot construction project in Sentosa. The
beams are expected to carry, a service load of 22.5 kN/m and a dead load of 10 kN/m,
including its self-weight and the bituminous materials on the slabs. The typical span length
is 8 m and it is simply supported. Material properties are specified below:
The difference between effective depth and overall depth of the beam can be taken as 50
mm. Take any beam dimensions in nearest 25 mm.
(Design load, W = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk,)
Due to the headroom constraints, the beam depth shall be limited to 650 mm. Ductile
behavior is required. Perform the beam design and sketch your design with proper rebar
arrangements. The design shall conform to BS 8110.
Solution:
(a)
Design load, W = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) = 1.4 × 10 + 1.6 × 22.5 = 50 kN/m
wl 2 50 × 82
Design ultimate moment of the beam = = = 400kNm [1]
8 8
According to BS 8110, to ensure adequate ductility applies when redistribution does not
exceed 10 % ⇒ 0.775d ≤ z ≤ 0.95d
In order to find the minimum depth for a singly reinforced section z = 0.775 d which
corresponds to x/d = 0.5 and then
K = K ′ = 0.156
M 400 × 106
Then K = ⇒ 0.156 = [1]
bd 2 f cu {b × 6002 × 35}
400 × 106
⇒b = ⇒ b = 203.5 mm
0.156 × 35 × 600 2
In nearest 25 mm
⇒ b = 225 mm [1]
M 400 × 106
Now K = ⇒ K= = 0.141 < 0.156 [1]
bd 2 f cu {225 × 6002 × 35}
(
⇒ z = d 0.5 + 0.25 − K
0.9 ) = 600 ( 0.5 + 0.25 − 0.141
0.9 )
=483.2 mm [1]
M 400 × 106
As = = = 2069 mm 2
0.87 f y z 0.87 × 460 × 483.2
d= 600 mm
OR 7T20
650 mm
0.87 × 460 × 2199
= 276 mm
0.405 × 35 × 225
As = 7T20
X< 300 mm suitable.
OR 2T20 + 2T32
250
0.87 × 460 × 2236
= 280 mm mm
0.405 × 35 × 225
X< 300 mm suitable.
d= 600 mm
650 mm
[1] [1]
Notes:
If a student took the beam depth smaller than 650 mm and designed as a doubly reinforced
beam correctly, full marks should be given. If the ductility check is not done do not reduce
any marks.
If a student took the beam depth as 650 mm and designed as a doubly reinforced beam
correctly, 2 marks should be deducted for uneconomic design.
Using Design charts
[3]
6 6
M 400 × 10 400 × 10
= 5.6 ⇒ 5.6 = ⇒b = = 198.4mm [1]
bd 2
{b × 6002 } 5.6 × 6002
In nearest 25 mm
⇒ b = 200 mm [1]
But d/b is 3. So they have to consider d/b smaller value. If they don’t consider a smaller value
and still use 200 mm full mark can be given if they use the design chart.
M 400 × 106
Now = = 5.55 [1]
bd 2 {200 × 6002 }
200 200
mm mm
As′= 2T16 As′= 2T16
d= 600 mm
d= 600 mm
650 mm
650 mm
As = 2T20 +
As = 7T20 2T32
[1]
Notes:
If a student did not check for ductility of a doubly reinforced section not necessary to deduct
any marks. Distribute the 10 marks for design alone.