S
EVERAL STUDIES HAVE SHOWN on the Internet with risk for persons not seeking sex partners on the Internet.
that transmission of sexually
Design Cross-sectional survey conducted September 1999 through April 2000.
transmitted diseases (STDs),
such as human immunodefi- Setting and Participants A total of 856 clients of the Denver Public Health HIV
ciency virus (HIV) infection, often in- Counseling and Testing Site in Colorado.
volves persons with multiple and some- Main Outcome Measures Self-report of logging on to the Internet with the inten-
times anonymous sex partners.1-10 Sex tion of finding sex partners; having sex with partners who were originally contacted via
with anonymous partners typically has the Internet; number of such partners and use of condoms with them; and time since last
sexual contact with Internet partners, linked to HIV risk assessment and test records.
been initiated in bars, bathhouses, clubs,
or parks.4 It has been suggested that the Results Of the 856 clients, most were white (77.8%), men (69.2%), heterosexual
Internet may be another venue for the (65.3%), and aged 20 to 50 years (84.1%). Of those, 135 (15.8%) had sought sex part-
ners on the Internet, and 88 (65.2%) of these reported having sex with a partner initially
initiation of sexual contact.11 Observa-
met via the Internet. Of those with Internet partners, 34 (38.7%) had 4 or more such
tions of chat rooms and other Internet partners, with 62 (71.2%) of contacts occurring within 6 months prior to the client’s HIV
sites reveal that the Internet facilitates test. Internet sex seekers were more likely to be men (P,.001) and homosexual (P,.001)
communication of sexual desires, as well than those not seeking sex via the Internet. Internet sex seekers reported more previous
as in-person meetings resulting in sexual STDs (P=.02); more partners (P,.001); more anal sex (P,.001); and more sexual expo-
contact.12 Identifying information such sure to men (P,.001), men who have sex with men (P,.001), and partners known to
as full name, address, or place of work be HIV positive (P,.001) than those not seeking sex via the Internet.
may be withheld from Internet-based sex Conclusions Seeking sex partners via the Internet was a relatively common prac-
partners. Due to the impossibility of ob- tice in this sample of persons seeking HIV testing and counseling (representative of
serving this behavior from initiation of neither Denver nor the overall US population). Clients who seek sex using the Inter-
conversation to completion of a sexual net appear to be at greater risk for STDs than clients who do not seek sex on the
encounter, it is difficult to gauge the rate Internet.
at which persons engage in Internet- JAMA. 2000;284:443-446 www.jama.com
©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, July 26, 2000—Vol 284, No. 4 443
than 3 partners using the Internet. Most ners whom they had originally met on
Table 3. Risk Behaviors and Internet-Usage
of Study Subjects Seeking HIV Testing at the contacts occurred in the 6 months prior the Internet, then they became online
Denver Public Health HIV Counseling and to the client’s visit to the DPHHCTS, and partners(n=88).Onlineseekerswhohad
Testing Site* condom use during the last encounter not initiated sex contacts via the Inter-
Characteristics No. (%) of with an Internet partner was reported by net constituted the online-no-partner
(No. Responding) Subjects
only 37 (44.0%) of 84 clients. Of the 88 group (n=47). The online partner and
Seeking sex partners on 135 (15.8)
Internet (n = 856) clients who reported initiating sexual the online-no-partner groups are com-
Ever had sex with Internet 88 (65.2) contact via the Internet, of 86 report- bined to form the online seekers.
partner (n = 135)
No. of Internet sex partners ing, 78 (90.7%) used home computers As shown in TABLE 4, there were some
(n = 88) and 5 clients (5.8%) did so at work. similarities in age and in race between
0 1 (1.1)
1 26 (29.5)
To compare the risk for STD/HIV in groups. However, online seekers were
2 13 (14.8) Internet sex-seekers with that of clients more likely to be men than offline cli-
3 14 (15.9) who did not seek sex on the Internet, we ents: 13 women reported seeking sex
$4 34 (38.7)
Time last Internet-initiated divided the sample by responses to the partners on the Internet. Online seek-
sex contact occurred, first 2 questions on our Internet-usage ers were more likely to be homosexual
mo (n = 87)
,3 47 (54.0) survey. Clients who had never logged on than offline clients, and online part-
3-6 15 (17.2) to the Internet with the intention of seek- ners were more likely to be homo-
7-12 9 (10.4)
.12 16 (18.4) ing a sex partner were called the offline sexual than the online-no-partner group.
Used condom at last 37 (44.0) group (n=721), indicating that sex part- As shown in TABLE 5, some risk fac-
Internet-initiated sex
(n = 84) ners were not sought using the Internet. tors were more frequently reported by the
Site of logging on (n = 86) If clients responded that they had logged online than the offline group. Online
Home 78 (90.7)
Work 5 (5.8)
on to the Internet with the intention of seekers were more likely to have had a
Other 3 (3.5) seeking a sex partner, they were classi- previous STD than the offline clients,
*A total of 856 subjects were studied. Number of respon- fied as online seekers (n=135). If online thus increasing their risk of acquiring fu-
dents answering each question varied. HIV indicates hu-
man immunodeficiency virus. seekers reported having sex with part- ture STDs such as HIV.13-15 Online seek-
ers had greater numbers of partners than
offline clients but were more likely to
Table 4. Demographic Characteristics of the Offline, Online Seeker, Online-No-Partner, and
Online Partner Groups* have used a condom during their last sex
No. (%) of Subjects
act. Oral and anal sex were more fre-
quently reported by online seekers, with
Online Online Online vaginal sex less frequently reported. On-
Offline Seeker No Partner Partner
Characteristics (n = 721) (n = 135) (n = 47) (n = 88) line seekers reported more sexual expo-
Age, y, No. responding (n = 686) (n = 127) (n = 44) (n = 83) sure to men and to men who have sex
,19 25 (3.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) with men than offline clients, and on-
20-29 234 (34.1) 37 (29.1) 11 (25.0) 26 (31.3) line partners were still more likely to be
30-39 200 (29.1) 47 (37.0) 20 (45.4) 27 (32.5) exposed to men and to men who have
40-49 139 (20.3) 27 (21.3) 8 (18.2) 19 (22.9) sex with men than those in the online-
50-59 69 (10.1) 15 (11.8) 5 (11.4) 10 (12.1) no-partner group. Only 14.5% of the of-
$60 19 (2.8) 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.2) fline clients reported sexual exposure to
Sex, No. responding† (n = 716) (n = 135) (n = 47) (n = 88) a person known to be HIV-positive, while
Men 467 (65.2) 122 (90.4) 42 (89.4) 80 (90.9) 28.9% of online seekers reported this ex-
Women 249 (34.8) 13 (9.6) 5 (10.6) 8 (9.1) posure. Of online partners, 35.2% had
Race, No. responding (n = 719) (n = 133) (n = 44) (n = 86) been sexually exposed to a person known
White 548 (76.2) 115 (86.5) 39 (83.0) 76 (88.4) to be HIV positive. Though the sample
Black 45 (6.3) 5 (3.8) 1 (2.1) 4 (4.6) size of HIV-positive persons was small
Hispanic 85 (11.8) 8 (6.0) 5 (10.7) 3 (3.5) (n = 7), online seekers (2.22%) were
Native American 10 (1.4) 1 (0.8) 1 (2.1) 0 (0.0) about as likely as offline clients (0.55%)
Other 31 (4.3) 4 (2.9) 1 (2.1) 3 (3.5) to be HIV positive.
Sexual orientation, No. responding (n = 715) (n = 133) (n = 47) (n = 86)
Heterosexual‡ 511 (71.4) 43 (32.3) 23 (48.9) 20 (23.3) COMMENT
Homosexual‡ 149 (20.9) 79 (59.4) 21 (44.7) 58 (67.4) The sample of DPHHCTS clients is rep-
Bisexual 55 (7.7) 11 (8.3) 3 (6.4) 8 (9.3) resentative of neither Denver nor the US
*A total of 856 subjects were studied. Number of respondents answering each question varied. population as a whole. However, among
†Offline vs online-seeking group comparison significant at P,.001.
‡Offline vs online-seeking group comparison significant at P,.001 and online-no-partner vs online partner group com- this sample, the Internet clearly has had
parison significant at P,.01.
a role in the solicitation of risky sex part-
©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, July 26, 2000—Vol 284, No. 4 445
Table 5. Comparison of Risk Factors Between Groups Who Used the Internet to Seek Sex Partners and Those Who Did Not*
Offline Online Seeker Online No Partner Online Partner
(n = 721) (n = 135) (n = 47) (n = 88)
ners. Clients who reported seeking sex 1998. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and who have sex with men. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly
Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention; Decem- Rep. 1999;48:45-48.
on the Internet were more likely to have ber 28, 1998. Fact Sheet. 8. Aral SO, Holmes KK. Social and behavioral deter-
concomitant risk factors for STD/HIV 2. Valleroy L, Mackellar DA, Rosen D, Secura G. Preva- minants of the epidemiology of STDs. In: Holmes KK,
lence and predictors of unprotected receptive anal in- ed. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3rd ed. New York,
than clients who did not seek sex on the tercourse for 15- to 22-year-old men who have sex NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:39-76.
Internet. Thus, seeking sex on the In- with men in seven urban areas, USA. From: 12th In- 9. Aral SO, Hughes JP, Stoner B, et al. Sexual mixing
ternet may be a potential risk factor for ternational Conference on AIDS: June 28-July 3, 1998; patterns in the spread of gonococcal and chlamydial
Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract 23139. infections. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:825-833.
STD/HIV. These data underscore the 3. Rosario M, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Hunter J, Gwadz 10. Aral SO. Sexual network patterns as determi-
need for development of strategies to pro- M. Sexual risk behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual nants of STD rates. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:262-
youths in New York City. AIDS Educ Prev. 1999;11: 264.
mote STD/HIV prevention among on- 476-496. 11. Lamb M. Cybersex: research notes on the char-
line sex seekers. 4. Handsfield HH, Whittington WL, Desmon S, et al. acteristics of the visitors to online chat rooms. Devi-
Resurgent bacterial sexually transmitted disease among ant Behav Interdisciplinary J. 1998;19:121-135.
Funding/Support: Funding for this study was pro- men who have sex with men. MMWR Morb Mortal 12. Bull SS, McFarlane M. Soliciting sex on the Inter-
vided by grant R18/CCR815954-02 from the Divi- Wkly Rep. 1999;48:773-777. net. Sex Transm Dis. In press.
sion of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, National Cen- 5. Whittington W, Kent C, Kohn R, et al. Gonorrhea 13. Richey CM, Macaluso M, Hook EW. Determi-
ter for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for among men who have sex with men. MMWR Morb nants of reinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex
Disease Control and Prevention. Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46:889-892. Transm Dis. 1999;26:4-11.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pri- 14. Wasserheit JN. Epidemiological synergy. Sex
mary and secondary syphilis. MMWR Morb Mortal Transm Dis. 1992;19:61-77.
REFERENCES Wkly Rep. 1999;48:873-878. 15. Royce RA, Sena A, Cates W Jr, Cohen MS. Sexual
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 7. Page-Shafer KA, McFarland W, Kohn R, et al. In- transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1072-
HIV/AIDS Epidemic in the United States, 1997- creases in unsafe sex and rectal gonorrhea among men 1078.
446 JAMA, July 26, 2000—Vol 284, No. 4 (Reprinted) ©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.