Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-05-30 Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC – master of the “Leave to File
Denied”
Judge Leon keeps papers duly filed by plaintiffs in civil rights matter up to a couple of months in chambers,
then mails them back with hand-inscriptions “Leave to File Denied, RJL”. It is a convenient procedure,
employed when the papers provide evidence or arguments that Judge Leon does not like, particularly in
matters related to judicial corruption. It is part of Simulated Litigation practices.
US Congress should perform its duties…

Richard J Leon, Judge

US District Court, Washington DC

Los Angeles, May 30 – “US Judge Richard Leon interprets the US Constitution in a peculiar way,” says
Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO). “If your evidence or your arguments are not his cup of
tea, he simply keeps the papers in chambers, and refuses to let the clerk docket them”.
The practice appears to be reserved as a special treatment for pro se litigants, who come to court in attempt to
protect their rights against judicial corruption and abuse by large corporations.
In Windsor v Olinda Judge Leon ‘denied the leave to file’ a Motion for his own Disqualification…
In Windsor et Evans et al in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff William Windsor filed
complaint under cause of actions of Deprivation of rights under the color of law, 42 USC §1983, pertaining
to alleged Fraud on the Court by US Judge Olinda Evans of the US District Court, Northern District of
Georgia, as part of Simulated Litigation. [i ,ii ]

Figure 1: Five (5) papers with “Leave to file Denied, RJL” in Windsor v Evans et al
z Page 2/4 May 30, 2011

“At times Judge Leon held the papers in chambers up to two months,” says Windsor, “The papers
disappeared, and I had no way to know where they went, until he mailed them back, with ‘Leave to File
Denied, RJL’. In my opinion it should be considered collusion of Judge Leon and Clerk of the Court Nancy
Mayer-Whittington.”
In Zernik v Melson et al, Judge Leon ‘denied the leave to file’ an Opinion Letter of highly decorated Fraud
Expert docketed...
In Zernik v Melson et al in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff filed a Petition for a Writ of
Mandamus to Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties, 28 USC §1361. The petition pertained to refusal
of FBI and US Department of Justice to protect the rights of 10 million residents of Los Angeles County,
California, in view of indisputable evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [iii ]

Figure 2: A total of nine (9) papers with “Leave to file Denied RJL” in Zernik v Melson et al.

“He is very methodical,” says Zernik. In this case Judge Leon ‘denied the leave to file’ of:
• Letter of a highly decorated FBI veteran, a Fraud Expert, who opined regarding conduct of the Los
Angeles Superior Court “fraud being committed’, and recommended “investigation should be
immediately instituted”. [iv ]
z Page 3/4 May 30, 2011

• March 2008 Memorandum Opinion of the Honorable Jeff Bohm in the Case of Borrower Parsley, where
Judge Bohm documented and rebuked the fraudulent litigation practices of Countrywide (today a
subsidiary of Bank of America), and recorded that the corporation promised to cease such conduct. [v ]
• Five (5) papers, which had been previously filed in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas, under the Case of
Borrower Parsley, [vi ] and which provided evidence that Countrywide and Bank of America nevertheless
continued to engage in Fraud on the Courts.
Once the evidence was excluded from the record, Judge Leon issued a Simulated Order, purporting to dismiss
Zernik’s Petition, and stated that the petition simply originated in a “contentious litigation”.
“It is a very effective way to address judicial corruption,” says Zernik, “you simply suppress the evidence of
its existence…”
The case also documents the tight links between corruption of large financial institutions and corruption of the
US courts, as inherent to the ongoing financial crisis.
Conduct of the clerks is inherent to corruption of the courts, as are the electronic record systems of the US
Courts (PACER and CM/ECF)
A century ago, conditions in the US courts were described in the US Congress as “a burlesque”. Corruption
of the clerks was considered inherent to the situation. The solution was removing the clerks from under the
authority of the judges, and placing them under the direct authority of the US Attorney General, as part of the
Salary Act (1919). [vii ] The Salary Act is credited with restoring the integrity of the US courts at that time.
However, by the mid 20th century, the clerks were again placed under authority of the judges.
“We are back in square one,” says Dr Zernik, “the idea behind the office of the clerk, for hundreds of years,
was as a check and balance against judicial corruption.” Evidently, it does not work when the clerks are under
authority of the same judges that they are supposed to monitor.
“The implementation of invalid computer systems in the US courts is also central to the situation,” says Dr
Zernik, who gained expertise in examining fraud in the state and US courts in recent years. [viii ]
The cases, described above, are of pro se litigants, who are not permitted access to the electronic filing system,
and that fact, in itself, opens the way for their routine abuse in the US courts.
However, the fraud in the computers of the US courts goes far beyond that. “The systems were designed to
enable the conduct of entire cases as Simulated Litigation,” says Dr Zernik. Dr Zernik’s reports on the
computers of the US courts were published in a peer-reviewed international computer science journal, and
selected for presentation in the World Criminology Congress. Dr Zernik also filed his reports with Harvard
Law Professor Yochai Benkler, and expert on computers and the law, for review. Report, authored by Dr
Zernik, which was based in part on analysis of fraud in computers of the courts and prisons, was incorporated
into a United Nations Human Rights Council 2010 Staff Report, with a note referring to “corruption of the
courts and the legal profession” in California. [ix ]
“Richard Leon was probably at his best as counsel during Iran-Contra, in suppressing evidence of wrongdoing
by government officials,” says Zernik “but he is unfit for the bench.”
The US Congress should perform its duties…
The US Congress should perform its duties, the US courts have descended to a level of corruption that has not
been seen for a century. Unless corruption of the courts is addressed, there is no chance of restoring the
integrity of the financial system.
LINKS:
z Page 4/4 May 30, 2011

i
Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process
§ 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits
an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to
another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment,
or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the
document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any
action in response to the document, in compliance with the
document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with
the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a
sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
ii
11-11-12 PRESS RELEASE: Maid of the Mist Corporation Et Al v Alcatraz Media, LLC, et al (1-09-Cv-01543) Simulated Litigation - Fraud in
the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/55272776/H
iii
11-05-11 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: Docket and other PACER reports in Simulated
Litigation conducted by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/55231462/H
iv
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #2 - Fraud Expert
Opinion Re: Fraud by California Judges in collusion with Countrywide, Bank of America in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles - "leave to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56296200/H
v
Memorandum Opinion of the Hon Jeff Bohm in the Case of Borrower Parsley (05-90374) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas,
which were “denied leave to file” by Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court, DC:
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #1 - Evidence of
corrupt practices by Countrywide and Bank of America in the US Courts - "leave to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56295907/H
vi
Records from the Case of Borrower Parsley (05-90374) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, which were “denied leave to file” by
Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court, DC:
[1] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #4 - Notice filed
by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave
to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56296583/H
[2] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #5 - Records
filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles -
"leave to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56296879/H
[3] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #6 - Additional
Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles - "leave to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56297039/H
[4] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #7 - Further
Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles - "leave to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56297417/H
[5] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #8 - Further
Evidence filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles - "leave to file denied"
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56297994/H
vii
02-00-00 Messinger, I Scott: Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts, Federal Judicial Center (2002)
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/H
viii
11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/H
ix
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights
in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/H