By
Donald Sull
Before the recession, many companies relied on boom-time macroeconomic conditions (low
interest rates, ready capital, consumer confidence, and the like) to drive profitable growth. As a
result, organizational reflexes slowed, the sinews required for quick action atrophied. Now,
however, firms face tough market conditions and irreducible uncertainty along critical
dimensions—among them, inflation or deflation, exchange rates, and regulation, as
governments intervene in more sectors of the economy. And, of course, the usual sources of
market turbulence—geopolitics, technological innovation, and competitive dynamics—remain.
As companies crawl out of the recession, it’s not enough for leaders to craft the “perfect”
strategy, put their heads down, and make it happen, confident that the market will cooperate.
Instead, they must set a broad strategic direction but remain open to unexpected opportunities
that appear along the way. More than ever, companies need agility—the capability to
consistently spot and execute on unexpected opportunities before rivals do.
So how can managers assess whether their organizations are fit enough for the new business
environment? How can they identify the obstacles preventing their organizations from
executing effectively, and how can they overcome those barriers?
Over the past 10 years, I have studied firms that excelled at execution in some of the world’s
fastest-changing markets, such as China and Brazil, and most unforgiving industries, like
financial services and fast fashion. Through my research, I’ve identified common obstacles that
undermine firms’ ability to execute on their established strategies and take advantage of
unexpected opportunities. By asking themselves the seven questions below, managers can
quickly assess their companies’ readiness to rebound.
In many organizations, variable pay represents a tiny fraction of overall compensation, and the
range of possible bonuses is quite narrow, barely distinguishing between top and
underperforming employees. Executives socialize bonuses in the name of teamwork, arguing
that differential payouts could stifle cooperation and long-term thinking. This is a mistake. To
ensure execution, organizations should recognize and reward individuals who do what they say
they will with outsized bonuses. Paying for performance not only ensures execution but also
attracts and retains ambitious employees and encourages them to execute on current
priorities.
Companies that execute on their strategies quickly and effectively tend to construct solid
organizational hardware: information systems, corporate priorities, hydraulics, incentives, and
so forth. But they also program in software—that is, the right culture, people, and leadership
for execution. Indeed, the most agile organizations I have studied share a core set of values:
achievement that recognizes and rewards employees for setting and achieving ambitious goals;
ownership to take personal responsibility for results; teamwork to foster coordination;
creativity to challenge the status quo; and integrity to offset the temptation to cut corners that
can arise when employees strive to hit ambitious performance targets.
Senior executives who dash from crisis to crisis are a sign of organizational weakness, not
leadership strength. The economic crisis forced many executives into firefighting mode, but
relying on ad hoc management in the postrecession economy is unacceptable. Senior leaders’
most important job is to build the organizational hardware and software for execution and
prevent it from falling into disrepair. Leaders must guard the culture—walking the talk on core
values, ensuring that career advancement is based on adherence to those values, and
sometimes walking away from attractive opportunities that would dilute the culture, such as
rapid growth or a merger with a dysfunctional company.