Dear Raghuvir

I am not getting exactly what you want to ask

if you are an investor, you can open as may demat account and online trading account as
you wish to...you need not to take any approval. you can trade with n number of stock
brokers and change it at your wish.
if you are asking from company's point of view.. there is broker to the issue at the time of
IPO of the company.. if once decided by the company and published in prospectus,,it can
not be changed without sebi approval

Good Morning Sir,

Please help on the following query and if feasible provide link/ reference.

Can one change his/ her stock broker ?

If so what are the SEBI guidelines for that.

"Neoliberal democracy. Instead of citizens, it produces consumers. Instead of

communities, it produces shopping malls. The net result is an atomized society of
disengaged individuals who feel demoralized and socially powerless.

In sum, neoliberalism is the immediate and foremost enemy of genuine participatory

democracy, not just in the United States but across the planet, and will be for the
foreseeable future."
— Noam Chomsky

Good Morning Sir,

As discussed, I am currently pursuing M.B.A.Entrepreneurship from the Central

University of Rajasthan- Kishangadh.

I am planning to learn traits of Entrepreneurship under your mentorship during my

summer internship ( six weeks w.e.f. May 2011)

The focus of current context shall be ( either/ all of the following)

1. " Exploring Educational Avenues in Knowledge Economy: A pragmatic Business

Model"
2. " Exploring Avenues in Exports@ Western Rajasthan in general, Jodhpur/
Barmer/ Pali/ Jalore-in particular"
3. " Identifying and Encashing the latent opportunities around "

The scanned copy of internship letter is appended, though i shall provide you duly filled
hard copy at the time of joining.
I am optimist of this association and the returns shall be greater than investment of time.
I request you to consider my application and confirm the same ASAP.

For Sh Sanjay Garg only:

Sh Narvikram is Director- Central Modern Womens' B.Ed College- Jodhpur
FYI & NA please

Regards,
Raghubir Singh
# 8955251816

Will the iron fence save the tree hollowed by termites?

When the wind changes direction, there r those who build walls, and those who
build windmill.

The future is not what it used to be.

Our 14-year-old dog Abbey died last month. The day after she passed away my 4-
year-old daughter Meredith was crying and talking about how much she missed
Abbey. She asked if we could write a letter to God so that when Abbey got to
heaven, God would recognize her. I told her that I thought we could so, and she
dictated these words:

Dear God,

Will you please take care of my dog? She died yesterday and is with you in heaven. I
miss her very much. I am happy that you let me have her as my dog even though she
got sick.
I hope you will play with her. She likes to swim and play with balls. I am sending a
picture of her so when you see her you will know that she is my dog. I really miss
her.

Love, Meredith

We put the letter in an envelope with a picture of Abbey and Meredith and
addressed it to God/Heaven. We put our return address on it. Then Meredith pasted
several stamps on the front of the envelope because she said it would take lots of
stamps to get the letter all the way to heaven. That afternoon she dropped it into the
letter box at the post office. A few days later, she asked if God had gotten the letter
yet. I told her that I thought He had.

Yesterday, there was a package wrapped in gold paper on our front porch
addressed, 'To Meredith' in an unfamiliar hand. Meredith opened it. Inside was a
book by Mr. Rogers called, 'When a Pet Dies.' Taped to the inside front cover was
the letter we had written to God in its opened envelope. On the opposite page was
the picture of Abbey & Meredith and this note:

Dear Meredith,

Abbey arrived safely in heaven. Having the picture was a big help and I recognized
her right away.

Abbey isn't sick anymore. Her spirit is here with me just like it stays in your heart.
Abbey loved being your dog. Since we don't need our bodies in heaven, I don't have
any pockets to keep your picture in so I am sending it back to you in this little book
for you to keep and have something to remember Abbey by.

Thank you for the beautiful letter and thank your mother for helping you write it
and sending it to me. What a wonderful mother you have. I picked her especially for
you. I send my blessings every day and remember that I love you very much. By the
way, I'm easy to find. I am wherever there is love.

Love,

God

Don't say you're too busy to forward this. Just go ahead and do it.

The Vice Chancellor

AMU, Aligarh

The incidents that took place on 29.4.11 and 30.4.11 were shameful for the whole AMU
Community. The Proctor office has issued a list of 38 students suspended till enquiry in
30.4.11 incident. I extends my full support to the University administration to take action
against the ‘CULPRITS’ [if they are proved to be so] but will not allow any action
against the INNOCENT students of the University. It is the famous legal principle of law
leave that ‘Let Hundred Guilty Be Acquitted But One Innocent Should Not Be Convicted’
With high resolution CCTV cameras installed at the Proctor Office it can be very easy to
identify the REAL CULPRITS. But it is astonishing to note that Proctor Office has not
relied on the CCTV footage to identify the culprits and has prepared the list of the
students without any established evidence (“Evidence” as defined in Indian Evidence
Act, 1872). To keep the accused student in dark regarding the materials used against him
during any discipline inquiry is a sheer violation of the principle of natural justice and the
established law of the land. This seriously questions the credibility of AMU as a true
democratic Central Govt. funded institution which follows the basic principle of law such
as principle of natural justice. Providing all the evidences to an accused during any
discipline proceedings is natural requirement in law and such has been ruled in several
Supreme Court judgments.

In the case of State of U.P. vs. Shatrughan Lal, (1998) 6 SCC 651 wherein Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India held

“where the charge-sheet is issued and the documents which are proposed to be utilized
against that person are indicated in the charge-sheet but copies thereof are not supplied
to him in spite of his request and at the same time he is called upon to submit his reply
cannot constitute an effective opportunity to defend The aforesaid decision is of no help
to the facts of the respondent's case.”

As claimed by the students some of the names in the list were not present at the Proctor
Office during the time of incidence nor were they involved in any way in the whole
incidence. Some were studying in the Library, some were present in their halls of
residences and some were preparing for their examination which was to be held on very
next day. Some of the students are in their final year and have their remaining
examinations from 18th and their results to be displayed in 1st week of June. Some of
them have been placed in companies and are waiting to get their degrees. It is painful to
note that students have been SUSPENDED till ENQUIRY without any EVIDENCE.
What mechanism has proctor used to ensure that no innocent student is trapped? How
will the administration recover the loss of the student if he is found INNOCENT after 2-3
months of enquiry? Natural justice suggests that “Burden of proof lies on the accuser”.
What is the evidence that the students listed were involved in the incidence?

In the famous Meneka Gandhi vs. Union of India reported in AIR 1978 Supreme
Court597 the Hon’ble Supreme Court discussed the increasing importance of Natural
Justice and observed that Natural Justice is a great humanizing principle intended to
invest law with fairness and to secure Justice and over the years it has grown in to a
widely pervasive rule. The Supreme Court extracted a speech of Lord Morris in the
House of Lords which is an very interesting speech (I quote)

That the conception of natural justice should at all stages guide those who
dischargejudicial functions is not merely an acceptable but is an essential part f the
philosophy ofthe law. We often speak of the rules of natural justice. But there is nothing
rigid or mechanical about them. What they comprehend has been analysed and described
in many authorities. But any analysis must bring into relief rather their spirit and
theirinspiration than any precision of definition nor precision as to application. We do
notsearch for prescriptions which will lay down exactly what must, in various divergent
situations, be done. The principle and procedures are to be applied which, in
anyparticular situation or set of circumstances, are right and just and fair. Natural
justice, it has been said, is only “fair play in action”. Nor do we wait for directions from
Paliament.

Hon’ble Supreme court of India in (Keshri Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1979 3 SLR 1
(Raj.) case held “It is not at all necessary that the disciplinary authority shall itself hold
the enquiry. There is nothing in the Constitution or in the Rules, which can prevent the
disciplinary authority from holding the enquiry itself. But if the delinquent raises any
question of bias on sound reasons, he may not hold the enquiry. Thus in a case, where
from all circumstances it was clear that the petitioner reasonably had an apprehension
that the disciplinary authority holding the enquiry was biased against him and had made
up his mind to punish him, this bias would vitiate the entire enquiry proceedings. “

Therefore it is strictly demanded that :

Students suspended in 30.4.11 incident who have no solid evidence against him
(CCTV footage) must be considered INNOCENT till enquiry and their
SUSPENSION must be immediately REVOKED. They must be allowed to appear in
the examinations starting from 18th May and collect their results so that the future
of the INNOCENT students is not destroyed. [according to the Principle of Natural
Justice which states that Both sides shall be heard, or audi alteram partem ]

And an UNBIASED enquiry be done as soon as possible KEEPING AWAY all the
people from the DC who are controversial or alleged to be an accuse in the incident
no matter what administrative position they hold in AMU or its disciplinary body
[according to the Principle of Natural Justice which states that No man shall be Judge in
his own cause ]

CBI Enquiry on the incidents that took place on 29.4.11 and 30.4.11 and strict
action against the culprits no matter what administrative position they hold in
AMU. [ according to Article 14 of Indian Constitution- “Equality before law – The State
shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws
within the territory of India.”]

(Aamir Qutub)

Hony Secretary
AMU Students’ Union

Copy to:

1. The Visitor, AMU

2. Honourable Chief Justice, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, India
3. Chairperson, National Human Rights Commission
4. The Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD), India