We just know that we are humans.

Perhaps, even that name is given by our own bra

ins to define ourselves!
If I were something else, just 'something' - not an alien, not some animal-just
something we cannot imagine and I was made in such a way that I never knew that
'something'like 'humans' exist.
More, to communicate[if by chance 'communication' existed]- I did not use any la
nguage or any means we are aware of, my 'acivities' - if they were, were absolut
ely different than our's. I hope u are now getting my point,
that even if a life occurs right in front of our eyes - what if we cannot recogn
ize them? What if we dont call it a life?
Science is based on calculations, and observations. how can you study something,
if we never knew that it actually exists?
Time - is standard. The definition of '1 second' is not based on speed of light[
although we assumed it to be so till we found that even light has it's mass] '1'
second, by atomic definition is a 'standard' duration - which is constant throu
ghout the universe.
Now we know that when we say rate of change with respect to time...we mean diffe
rence b/w two values of the particular quantity, at two instants of time. What i
f I want to know the rate of change of 'Time' with respect to 'Time'?
I must say it would be a good idea to differentiate.
i.e. dT/dt which should be, by logic, 'one'[dT/dt=1 prooves that time is not rel
ative] and hence any differentiation with respect to itself is 'one' [but not in
100% cases]
what if T is a function of some other parameters?
then we have to consider 'T' as a composite function, and in that case, there wi
ll be a differnce b/w two 'times'
And It would be mathematically easy to say that time, is actually relative.
Let's forget the easy part - the hard thing is to find those parameters on which
time depends!
e.g Volume depends on dimensions of a body, density onn mass, but 'Time' like ma
ss and length is fundamental.
MLT - the 3 fundamental units, all are facing a hard time.
mass - if a body is in motion, it is said that it'mass increase.
time - if a body is in motion even time is believed to slow/accelerate itself.
the common thing is 'motion'
now basically our evolution required something to judge some discipline in event
s and tried to relate it to duration b/w two events. Now, that is our theory...w
hich we created on earth, using the 'sequence and events' on earth. but when we
look at universe, the duration changes drastically.
Consider this,
we fire bombs, what happens?
something happens such that there's a release of energy and the particles spread
out and everything expands.
this all happens within 1 second[say]
suppose that during expansion of the particles, some life form originates on one
of the very tini particles...and that particle accomplishes some life. Everythi
ng from formation of life to it's evolution on that tiny particle will happen in
'supernano...mili microseconds'
we humans are that life on that small particle - earth. The bomb blast m talking
bout is big Bang. Now consider this -
those 'supernano....mili micro seconds' are our 'millions' of years...and that '
1' second of explosion represents the duration of universe - 'trillions f y'
If the life, on tiny particles tries to guess the duration around their 'tiny' p
articles, they will make a unit which is comfortable to thm. and that 1 second o
f blast would actually seem' very slow' as per their perspective.
however if something manages to move as fast as particles[which in our case is s
peed f light]- they would actually cover that distance very fast because, now th
e events's duration change. and time is the measure of duration of events.
I hope at least u get an idea...

speed and time do not exist in and of themselves, but ... are the product of the
way we represent things