Tambal: Conclusions Based on the findings, the following conclusions were made: (1) With the aid of learnings

gained from film subjects and

exposure to various film production activities, three broadcasting students were able to produce a short film of good quality. (2) Problems and difficulties are inevitable in the process of

producing a film. Following the stages of filmmaking can be of great help in avoiding delays, breaking of schedules and conflicts. (3) Three student filmmakers were able to produce a

film of very good quality despite the problems encountered with technicalities, coordination and time management. (4) The suggestions and critics of the experts are of great

contribution for anyone who is a neophyte in short film production. The necessary recommendations of experts can be a foundation to develop and improve a student production. Kodigo: Conclusions Based on the findings, the following conclusions were advanced: (1) Two Broadcasting students are capable of producing a good short film given the basic knowledge and skill in filmmaking, time and sufficient budget. Additional manpower

requirement maybe obtained with the help of schoolmates and friends. (2) Problems like unfavorable weather conditions and unreliable equipment are inevitable in making a short film. Delays may also occur in editing if the footages are infested by computer virus. (3) Evaluation and suggestions of experts are important in the improvement of a produced short film. White Out: Conclusion: On the basis of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) A team of two broadcasting students are capable of producing a short film that can earn a very good rating. They can write the script, direct, and perform the role of the producer given the proper training and exposure. (2) To produce a short film, there is a need to plan and prepare the things needed, in advance. Personal virtues such as perseverance, patience and dedication are needed to face the challenges and problems in production and to finish the work. (3) The very good rating of the short film prove that student filmmakers can produce quality films if given sufficient time, enough preparations, and technical expertise. Trash: Conclusions

The following conclusions were drawn based from the findings: (1) Three student filmmakers are capable of producing a short film with the assistance of technical experts in a limited time. However, time element is a great factor in producing quality films. If the production of the short film is not hurriedly done, the production cost could have been lessened and the short film should have been rated very good. (2) Problems encountered during the production could have been minimized if the producers have enough time doing the production. With time constraint, producers were pressured thereby affecting the outcome of the film production. However, These problems were able to be overcome by the support of certain individuals and by cooperation and dedication of the producers. (3) The good rating of the short film proves that student student film makers can produce quality films if given suficient time, enough preparations, efficiency, and technical expertise. Luho: Conclusions Based on the findings, the following conclusions were made: (1) Three broadcasting students undergone Audio-Video procedures and film classes can produce short film for Php 7,640.00 in three weeks and two days. This proves that

students can produce a short film if given a budget and ample time to do it. (2) One can never expect to produce a short film without encountering some problems. Sufficient preparation and budget, and most importantly, presence of mind and extreme focus while producing the film would help reduce these problems. It is because problems encountered and time given would define the kind and quality of the film produced. (3) With the jurors expertise, the short film Luho was rated very good. This is an indicator that students given the chance can produce satisfactory short films. (4) The suggestions given by the jurors during the evaluation of the short film can be use by the mass communications students and aspiring film makers. Thus, same mistake wont be committed twice. Stitsayd Boondocks: solas Conclusions The following conclusions were drawn based on the findings: (1) Three broadcasting students can produce a short film but only with the help of experts and friends who may supply the needed man power. (2) Enough time, sufficient funds, skilled man power, reliable equipment and ample preparation and planning are necessary to avoid problems in production and to be able to produce a film of good quality.

(3)

Student can produce a good comedy film satirizing a negative Filipino trait.

(4)

Experts evaluation and suggestions are necessary to improve a film production project.