The term nature as applied to financial management refers to its function, scope & objectives. Financial management, as an academic discipline, has undergone fundamental changes in its evolution it was treated synonymously with the raising of funds. In the current literature pertaining to financial management. A broader scope so as to include, in addition to procurement of funds efficient use of resources is universally recognize.
3.
markets. 3. The legal and accounting relationship between a firm and its sources of funds. The traditional approach evolved during the 1920s and 1930s but has how been discarded as it suffers from serious limitations. The weakness of the traditional approach falls in to this category.
4. Those relating to the treatment of various to emphasis attached to them. 5. Those relating to the basic conceptual and analytical 6. Frame work of the definition and the scope of the finance function.
(B) EXTENCIVE APPROACH: At the other extreme is another approach, which conceders that finance is concerned with cash only and that since nearly very business transition involves cash directly is concerned with very thing that take place in the conduct of business. This approach is too broad too be meaning full because if we accept this approaches the financial manager required to go I to detail of every business acting be it concerned with purchasing, production, marketing, personnel research and other associated activity.
MODERN APPROACH:
In the modern approach the finance function covers both acquisition of funds well as their allocation. The investment Decision: Short term or current which in the normal course of business are convertible in value, usually within a year i.e. working capital management.
5
Capital budgeting The most crucial financial decision for a firm is relies to selection of are assets or investment proposal or course of action whose benefits are likely to be available in future over the lifetime of the project. Working capital management It is concerned with the management of current assets. It is an important and integral part of financial management as short from survival is pre-requisite for long term success. one aspect of working capital management is the trade off between profitability and risk.
2. Financial decision
Financing decision is concerned with the financing mix or capital structure refers to the proportion of debt and equity capital. There are two aspacts of financing decision.
Theory of capital structure:Which shows the theoretical relationship between the employment of debt and return of shoulder?
2. Dividend policy Decisions
The third major decision of financial management id the decision relating to the dividend policy. Two alternatives are available in dealing with the profit of a firm. They can be distributed o the share holders in the it self. The decision has to which course should be followed depends largely on a significant element in the dividend decision i.e. the dividend pay net ratio, that is what proportion of net profiles should be paid out to the share holders. Thus, we may conclude that His modern approach involves the solution of three major decisions. This decision when jointly taken makes financial decision making optimal.
General Information
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla (Chairman) Mrs. Rajashree Birla Mr. M.L. Apte Mr. M.C. Bagrodia Mr. B.V. Bhargava Mr. R.C Bhargava Mr. Y.P. Gupta Mr. Cyril Shroff Mr. S.G. Subrahmanyan
kp P%
Mr. D.P. Mandelia
COMPANY SECRETARY
Mr. Ashok Malu
AUDITORS
M/s G.P. Kapadia & Co., Mumbai M/s Lodha & Co. New Delhi
REGISTERED OFFICE
GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED Birlagram, Nagda 456 331 (M.P)
10
DIRECTORS REPORT
PARTICULAR
Gross turnover Gross profit Less : depreciation Profit before exceptional item & tax expenses Exceptional items Surplus on pre payment of sales tax loan Profit before tax & diminution Provision for permanent diminution in the value of investment & loans Profit before tax Tx expenses Profit after tax Add :Debenture redemption reserve written back Investment allowance reserve written back Balance brought forward from previous year Surplus available for appropriation Appropriation General reserve Propose dividend Corporate tax on dividend Balance transfer to balance sheet 850.0 128.3 16.5 790.2 700.0 146.7 20.9 815.3 42.0 8.3 955.4 6.9 0.1 790.2 1077.3 1077.3 (298.0) 779.3 34.3 1395.7 (92.0) 1303.7 (418.0) 885.7 2003 2004 6130.0 1321.5 273.1 1048.4 2004 2005 7201.1 1645.9 284.5 1361.4
1785.0
1682.9
1785.0
1682.9
Your company has posted a commendable for the year ended 31st march, 2005.turnover, Gross profit and Net profit have been, indeed, impressive. Capacity utilization optimizing efficiencies and aggressive marketing of value added product have taken your company to this performance. All of your companys business have given gratifying results. The VSF business performance has been noteworthy. Production at 247,952 tons was a significant 12%higher over that of the previous year. Sales volume raises marginally due to the increased availability of cotton during the year. Realization grew by 9% at Rs 79,008 per ton, in line with the 11
international ternd, leading to higher operating profit. DIVIDEND Your Board has recommended a dividend of Rs 16 per share(last year Rs 14) and seeks your approval for the same. The total outgo of the dividend to be paid to the share holder will be Rs 167.3 crores(inclusive of Corporate Tax on Dividend @ 14.025% ) as against Rs 145.1 crores paid in the previous year. DEBENTURE AND TERM LOAN Your company has raised log term Foreign Currency loans aggregating USD 50 million (Rs 221 crores ) and Rupee loan of Rs 30 crores. The funds were utilized to meet the requirement of capital expenditure and for general corporate purposes. Your company has repaid debenture aggregating Rs. 74 crores. Your company repurchased its own debenture aggregating Rs.135 crores , and these have been extinguished in the books.
HUMAN RESOURCES
During the year ,the Organisational Health Survey , which is the barometer of happiness at index in the Group , was conducted .The result have been encouraging and confirm that we are by and large on right track as far as people processes and systems are concerned.
DIRECTORS
Mr. D.D.Rathi was appointed as a Whole Time Director of the company for a period of 3 years from 1st August , 2004 to 31st July 2007. Mrs. Raashree Birla , Mr. B.V.Bhargava and Mr. S.G.Subrahmanyan retire from office by rotation and being eligible , offer themselves for reappointment . a brief resume, expertise and details of other directorships of these directors are attached along with the Notice of the ensuing Annual General Meeting.
Directors wish to thank Central and State Grovernment , Banks, Financial institutions, Share holder and business associates for there continued co-operation and support. For and on behalf of the Borad KUMAR MANGALAM BIRLA 12
chairaman
AUDITORS REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED We have audited the attached the balance sheet of Grasim Industries Limited, as at 31st march, 2005 and also the profit and loss account and the cash flow account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. This financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standard generally accepted in India. Those standards required that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit include examining , on a test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
13
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion . As required by companies (auditors report) order. 2003(the order) issued by the central govt. of India in terms of sub- section 4A of section 227 of companies act, 1956, on the matters specified in the paragraphs 4 and 5 of the shade order, we further report that : In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business The company has not defaulted in repayments of any dues to financial institution or banks or debenture holder On the basis of records made available to us, the company has created securities in respect of debenture issued / outstanding during year The company has not raised any money through a public issue during a year.
For G.P.Kapadia & co. Chartered Accountants NIMESH BHAMANI Partner (Membership no. 30547)
14
15
RATIO ANALYSIS
Financial analysis is the process of identifying the financial strengths and weakness of the firm by properly establishing relationship between the items of the Balance Sheet & Profit & Loss Account. Financial analysis can be undertaken by the management of the firm, or by the parties outside the firm owners, creditors, investors & others. The nature of analysis will differ depending on the purpose of the analysis. Management of the firm would be interested in every aspect of the financial analysis. It is their overall responsibility to see that the resources of the firm are used most effectively and efficiently and that the firms financial condition is sound. Ratio analysis is a powerful tool of Financial Analysis. A ratio is defined as The indicated quotient of two mathematical expressions and as The relationship between two or more thing. In financial analysis a ratio is used as a benchmark for evaluating the financial positions and performance of the firm. The rationale of ratio analysis lies in the fact that it makes relations information comparable. A single figure by itself has no meaning but when represented in terms of a related figure, it yields significant inferences.
PROFITABILITY RATIO
Company should earn profit to survive and grow for a long period of time. Profit is the difference between revenue and expenses over a period of time (usually one year). Profit is the ultimate output of a
16
company and it will have no future if it fails to make sufficient profits. Therefore a financial manager should continuously evaluate the efficiency of the company in terms of profits. Profitability ratios are calculated to measure the operating efficiency of the company. Apart from the creditors, both short-term and long-term, also interested in the financial soundness of a firm are the owners and management of the firm is naturally eager to measure its operating efficiently. Similarly, the owners invest their funds in the expectation of reasonable returns. The operating efficiency of a firm and its ability to ensure adequate returns to its shareholders depends ultimately on the profits earned by it. The profitability of a firm can be measured by its profitability ratios. Profitability ratios can be determined on the basis of either sales or investments. PROFITABILITY RATIOS RELATED TO SALES These ratios are based on the premise that a firm should earn sufficient profit on each rupee of sales. If adequate profits are not earned on sales, there will be difficulty in meeting the operating expenses and no returns will be available to the owners. These ratios consist of:
Gross Profit Ratio. Net Profit Ratio. Operating Ratio. Expense Ratio. Stock Turnover Ratio.
17
Sales Sale of Scrap. (Raw material + Manufacturing exp.) Increase / Decrease in stock. Sales COGS.
Interpretation The Gross Profit ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 35.09% and in year 2003-04 is 51.98% and in year 2004-05 is 34.76%. Which shows management efficiency of the company. In the year 2003-04 it is increasing which is favourable for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is decreasing which is unfavourable for the company
18
Net Sales: Sales Sale of Scrap. Net Profit ratio of 2004-05: Net Profit ratio = 885.71*100/6229.26 = 14.21% The Net Profit ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years PAT Net Sales Percentage 2002-03 367.58 4606.20 7.98% 2003-04 779.26 5213.21 14.95% 2004-05 885.71 6229.26 14.21%
Interpretation The Net Profit ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 7.98% and in year 2003-04 is 14.95% and in year 2004-05 is 14.21%. Which shows management efficiency of the company. In the year 2003-04 it is increasing which is favourable for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is decreasing which is unfavourable for the company
OPERATING RATIO
Operating Ratio is the ratio that shows relationship between Costs of good sold plus operating expenses and Net sales. It shows the efficiency of the management. The higher the ratio the less will be the margin available to the owners of the company. FORMULA = COGS + OPERATING EXP*100 / NET SALES Net Sales = Sales (Income from Dividend + Income from Services + Income from Rent) COGS = (Raw material + Manufacturing exp.) Increase / Decrease in stock Operating Exp = Administration exp + Selling exp + Financial exp Operating Profit ratio of 2004-05
19
Operating Profit ratio = 4063.9 + 1530.67 *100/ 6229.26 = 96.86% The Operating Profit ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years COGS OPERATING EXP NET SALE PERCENTAGE 2002-03 2989.66 1530.67 4606.20 98.13% 2003-04 2503.38 1647.41 5213.38 79.61% 2004-05 4063.9 1963.9 6229.26 96.76%
Interpretation The Operating ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 98.13% and in year 2003-04 is 79.61% and in year 2004-05 is 96.76%. Which shows management efficiency of the company. In the year 2003-04 it is high which is unfavourable for the company but in the year 2003-04 it is low which is favourable for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is high which is unfavourable for the company
20
EXPENSES RATIO
Another profitability ratio related to the sales is the expenses ratio. It is compared by dividing expenses by sales. The term Expense Includes. 1. 2. 3. 4. Cost of good sold. Administrative expenses. Selling and distribution expenses. Financial expenses but excludes taxes, dividends, and extraordinary losses due to theft of goods, goods destroyed by fire and so on.
The expense ratio is closely related to profit margin, gross as well as net. The expense ratio is thus important for analysing the profitability of a firm. As a working proportion, a low ratio as favourable, while a high one is unfavourable. FORMULA: TOTAL EXPENSES * 100 / NET SALES Total Expenses = Expenses excluding Depreciation. The Expenses ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Total Expense Net Sales Percentage 2002-03 819.10 4606.20 17.78% 2003-04 8825.46 5213.21 15.83% 2004-05 938.46 6229.26 15.06%
Interpretation The Expenses ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 17.78% and in year 2003-04 is 15.83% and in year 2004-05 is 15.06%. Which shows management efficiency of the company. It is decreasing every year which favourable for the company.
The number of times the average stock is turned over during the year is known as stock turnover. It is computed by dividing the cost of goods sold by the average stock in business. Average stock the average of opening and closing stock of the year. If however, the monthly figure of the stock are available, the average monthly stock will give this ratio will be computed ratio. This ratio signifies that the average stock is turned over during the year. The stock turnover ratio is
thus important for analysing the stock turning capacity of a firm. If figure for cost of goods sold are not given then the ratio can be calculated on the basis of sales. FORMULA: COST OF SALES / AVG STOCK COST OF SALES = SALES AVG STOAK = OPENING STOCK + CLOSING STOCK /2 Stock Turnover ratio of 2004-05 Stock Turnover ratio = 6229.26 / 162.09 = 38.4 times The Stock Turnover ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years SALES Avg Stock Times 2002-03 4606.20 146.61 31.4 2003-04 5213.21 114.82 45.40 2004-05 6229.26 162.09 38.4
Interpretation The Stock Turnover ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 31.4times and in year 2003-04 is 45.40times and in year 2004-05 is 38.4times. Which shows management efficiency of the company. It is decreasing from 2003-04 to 2004-05 year. Which unfavourable for the company . The company should increase sales so that stock turnover ratio also increase.
22
Quick ratio Propriety ratio Debt equity ratio Gearing ratio Long term debts to fixed assets
23
CURRENT RATIO
The current ratio of the firm measures its short term solvency, that is, its ability to meet short term obligations, as a measure of short term / current financial liquidity. The higher the ratio, the larger is the amount of rupees available per rupee of current liability, the more is the firms ability to meet current obligations and the greater is the safety of funds of short term creditors. It is expressed in times. FORMULA: CURRENT ASSETS (CA) / CURRENT LIABILITY (CL) Current assets: Cash & Bank balance + Stock + Debtors + B/R + Prepaid expenses + Loans & Advances.
Current liabilities: Creditors + B/P + Bank OD + Unclaimed Dividend + Provision for Taxation.
Interpretation The Current ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 1.694:1 and in year 2003-04 is 1.580:1 It is decreasing which is not good for the company. In year 2004-05 is 1.672:1 which is better than 2003-04 but it is less than 2002-03
LIQUID RATIO
24
A variant of current ratio is the liquid ratio or quick ratio which is designed to show the amount of cash available to meet immediate payments. It is obtained by dividing the liquid liabilities. Liquid assets are obtained by deducting stock in trade from current assets. Stock is not treated as a liquid assets because it cannot be readily converted in to cash as and when required. The current ratio of a business does not reflect the true liquid position if its current assets consist largely of stock in trade.
FORMULA: CURRENT ASSETS / CURRENT LIABILITIES Current assets = Current Assets Stock Current liabilities = Current Liabilities Bank Overdraft Liquid ratio of year 2004-05: Liquid ratio= 1573.33/1108.30 = 1.41:1 The Liquid ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Current Assets Current liabilities Times 2002-03 1306.02 882.87 1.47:1 2003-04 1339.27 946.37 1.41:1 2004-05 1573.33 1108.30 1.41:1
Interpretation The Liquid ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 1.47:1 and in year 2003-04 is 1.41:1 It is constant which is not good for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is also 1.41:1 which shows that companys cash & bank balance is not increasing the company should make enough effort to increase their liquidity.
QUICK RATIO
The measure of absolute liquidity may be obtained by comparing only cash and bank balances as well as readily marketable securities with liquid assets. This is a very exacting standard and liquidity and it is satisfactory if the ratio is 0.5:1. It is computed by dividing the value of quick assets by liquid assets. It is rigorous measure of a firms ability to service short term liabilities. It is expressed in times.
25
FORMULA: QUICK ASSETS / LIQUID LIABILITIES Quick assets = Current Assets Inventories. Liquid liabilities = Current Liabilities Quick ratio of year 2004-05: Quick ratio= 86.70/1108.30 = 0.07:1 The Quick ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Quick Assets CL Times 2002-03 110.11 882.87 0.12:1 2003-04 227.48 946.37 0.24:1 2004-05 86.70 1108.30 0.07:1
Interpretation The Quick ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 0.12:1 and in year 2003-04 is 0.24:1 It is increasing which is good for the company but in the year 2004-05 is 0.07:1 which shows that companys cash & bank balance is gradually decreasing which is not good for the company.
PROPRIETARY RATIO The ratio shows the proportion of proprietor fund to the total assets employed in the business. The proprietor fund or shareholder equity consist of share capital and reserves &surplus.
. FORMULA: OWNERS FUND / TOTAL ASSETS Owners fund = Share Capital + Res&Sur + M/S Exp P&L a/c(Dr) Total assets = Fixed assets + Inv + Current assets
26
Proprietary ratio of year 2004-05: Proprietary ratio= 91.67/8030.93 = 1.41:1 The Quick ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Owners fund Total assets Times 2002-03 91.69 6536.69 1.40:1 2003-04 91.67 7232.36 1.26:1 2004-05 91.67 8030.93 1.14:1
Interpretation The Proprietary ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 1.40:1 and in year 2003-04 is 1.26:1 It is decreasing which is not good for the company and in the year 2004-05 is 1.14:1 which shows that companys finance position is not for the company.
27
The Debt Equity ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Long term lia. Owners fund Percentage 2002-03 2040.29 2977.29 68.52 % 2003-04 2036.89 3610.83 56.41 % 2004-05 1974.81 4328.35 45.62 %
Interpretation The Debt Equity ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 68.52% and in year 2003-04 is 56.41% and in year 2004-05 is 45.62% It is good for the firms because Debt Equity is one type of debtors so It is decreasing every year which is good sign for the company.
CAPITAL GEARING RATIO This ratio express the proportion of preference capital and ordinary capital. In other words it is the ratio of fixed dividend bearing capital to ordinary capital. The higher this ratio i.e. the greater the proportion of preference capital and debenture to ordinary capital, the capital structure of the company is said to be highly geared. In such cases the ordinary share of the company will be speculative because due to small increase in profit the ration of return on ordinary capital will increase substantially. The ratio is another form of proprietary ratio establishes relationship between the
outside long term liabilities and owners fund. It shows the proportion of funds provided by long term creditors and that provided by long term creditors and that provided by shareholders or proprietors. A higher ratio means that outside creditors has larger claim than owner of the business. If this ratio is lower, it is not profitable from the viewpoint of equity shareholders, as benefit of trading on equity is not availed of. FORMULA: FIXED CHARGE BEARING CAPITAL / EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL Fixed charge bearing capital = Pref Share capital + Deb + Long term lia Equity Share Capital = Share capital Capital gearing ratio of 2004-05 :
28
The Capital greaing ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Fixed charge bearing capital Eq Share Capital Times 2002-03 1595.86 91.67 17.40:1 2003-04 1422.80 91.67 15.52:1 2004-05 1534.02 91.67 16.73:1
Interpretation The Capital gearing ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 17.40:1 and in year 2003-04 is 15.52:1 and in year 2004-05 is 16:73:1 .
LONG TERM FUND TO FIXED ASSETS RATIO Normally the fixed assets of business must be purchased out of fixed assets only, which includes share capital ,reserve and long term liabilities. This ratio there fore shows the relationship between fixed capital and fixed assets. The ratio must be 1: 1 or more i.e. the fixed capital must be more than fixed assets or must at least be equal to fixed assets. If fixed capital is less than fixed assets , it would mean that short term fund have been used in purchasing fixed. when these short term obligation mature, the business would be put to trouble and may be compelled to dispose of its fixed assets at a considerable loss to business.
FORMULA: LONG TERM LIABILITIES / FIXED ASSETS * 100 LONG TERM LIABILITIES : SECURED LOANS + UNSECURED LOANS
Long term fund to fixed assets ratio of 2004-05 : Long term fund to fixed assets ratio = 4328.35/3194.81*100 = 135.4%
The Long term fund to fixed assets ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows:
29
Interpretation The Long term fund to fixed assets ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 62.8%% and in year 2003-04 is 112.9% and in year 2004-05 is 135.4% It is good for the firms because fixed capital high more favourable it is good sign for the company.
30
Composite ratio
Return on investment :o Return on capital employed o Return on share holder fund o Return on equity share holder fund Debtors turn over ( Debtors ratio ) Creditors turn over ( creditors ratio ) Fixed assets turn over ratio Total assets turn over Debt service ratio
31
Interpretation The Return on Capital Employed ratio of Company in the year 200203 is 14.70%% and in year 2003-04 is 25.28% and in year 2004-05 is 25.01% It is shows the over all profitability of the business high more favourable it is good sign for the company.
32
Interpretation The Return on Shareholder Fund of Company in the year 200203 is 12.34% and in year 2003-04 is 21.58% and in year 2004-05 is 20.46%. In the year 2002-03 it is low which is favourable for the company but in the year 2003-04 it is high which is unfavourable for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is lower than 2003-04 which is favourable for the company but company should try to make it lower.
33
Interpretation The Debtors turnover of Company in the year 200203 is 33.5 Days and in year 2003-04 is 33.4 Days and in year 2004-05 is 30.1 Days. In the year 2002-03 it was high which is favourable for the company but in the year 2003-04 it is same which is favourable for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is lower than 2003-04 &2002-03 which is unfavourable for the company it tells us that company is recovering its money in number of days .
34
FORMULA:
Debtor Turnover ratio of 2004-05 Debtor Turnover ratio = 360/ 30.1 = 11.9 TIME The Debtor Turnover ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Days Debtors ratio TIMES 2002-03 360 33.5 10.7 2003-04 360 33.4 10.7 2004-05 360 30.1 11.9
CREDITOR RATIO We have seen in above ratio that debtor ratio given us the number of days within which amount due for credit sale is collected. Similarly, the number of days with in which we make payment to our creditors for credit purchase is obtain from creditor velocity.
35
FORMULA: CREDITOR + BILLS PAYABLE * 360 / NET PURCHASE Creditor Turnover ratio of 2004-05 Creditor Turnover ratio = 827.89 * 360 / 1873.05 = 159.1 Days The Creditor Turnover ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Creditor Net Purchase DAYS 2002-03 752.49 1175.49 230.3 2003-04 752.49 1372.49 197.2 2004-05 827.89 1873.05 159.1
Interpretation The Creditor turnover of Company in the year 200203 is 230.3 Days and in year 2003-04 is 197.2 Days and in year 2004-05 is 159.1 Days. In the year 2002-03 it was high which is favourable for the company but in the year 2003-04 it is same which is favourable for the company but in the year 2004-05 it is lower than 2003-04 &2002-03 which is unfavourable for the company it tells us that companys payment policy .
36
FORMULA:
Creditor Turnover ratio of 2004-05 Creditor Turnover ratio = 827.89 * 360 / 1873.05 = 159.1 Days The Creditor Turnover ratio of Grasim industries Ltd. is as follows: Years Days Creditor ratio Times 2002-03 360 230.3 1.56 2003-04 360 197.2 1.82 2004-05 360 159.1 2.26
37
38
39
40
41
42
91.67 0.02 2885.62 2977.31 1500.86 539.26 35.95 2076.07 625.50 5678.88 5486.12 2330.11 3156.01 89.02 3245.03 25.06 1796.05 539.95 429.65 110.11 415.90 1495.61 752.49 130.38 882.87 612.74 5678.88
1.45 0.0003 50.81 52.42 26.42 9.495 0.633 36.55 11.01 100 96.60 41.03 55.57 1.567 57.14 0.441 31.62 9.508 7.565 1.938 7.323 26.33 13.25 2.295 15.54 10.78 100
43
91.67 0.02 3519.14 3610.83 1327.80 709.09 28.34 2065.23 632.50 6308.56 5705.53 2588.92 3116.61 79.09 3195.70 22.57 2540.65 459.46 484.63 227.48 324.44 1496.01 752.10 194.27 946.37 549.64 6308.56
1.45 0.0003 55.78 52.23 21.05 11.24 0.449 32.73 10.02 100 90.44 41.03 49.40 1.253 50.65 0.357 40.27 7.283 7.682 3.605 5.142 23.71 11.92 3.079 15.00 8.712 100
44
91.67 0.02 4236.66 4328.35 1439.02 535.79 33.54 2008.34 599.50 6936.19 5897.04 2848.17 3048.87 145.94 3194.81 13.73 2982.02 678.59 522.01 86.70 1.09 565.54 1853.93 827.89 820.41 1108.30 745.63 6936.19
1.32 0.0002 61.08 62.40 20.75 7.724 0.483 28.95 8.643 100 85.01 41.06 43.95 2.104 46.05 0.197 42.99 9.783 7.525 1.249 0.015 8.153 26.72 1.193 4.042 15.97 10.74 100
COMMONSIZE PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2003
(Rs. In crores )
45
PARTICULARS
31-03-2005
46
Net Sales (less of excise duty) Interest and dividend income Other income Increase / Decrease in stock INCOME Raw materials consumed Mfg expenses Purchase of finished and other product Payments to & provision for employ Admn, selling ,distribution & other expenses Interest & Dep.
4606.20 74.54 58.44 (13.75) 4725.43 1175.91 1244.81 17.62 332.24 819.10 422.54 4012.23 713.20 (208.62) 504.58 (192.00) 15.00 40.00 367.58 212.01 929.24 1508.83 91.67 11.75 450.00 955.41 1508.83
100 0.098 1.268 0.299 102.5 25.52 27.02 0.382 7.212 17.78 9.173 87.10 15.48 4.529 10.95 (4.168) 0.325 0.868 7.980 4.602 2.017 32.75 1.990 0.255 9.769 20.74 32.75
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
Profit before tax & exceptional items Profit / (loss) on sale of trade investment
COMMONSIZE PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2004
( Rs. In crores )
PARTICULARS Net Sales (less of excise duty) Interest and dividend income Other income Increase / Decrease in stock 47
INCOME Raw materials consumed Mfg expenses Purchase of finished and other product Payments to & provision for employ Admn, selling ,distribution & other expenses Interest & Dep.
5389.30 1372.49 1306.67 50.47 358.90 825.46 426.94 4340.93 1048.37 28.89 1077.26 (219.00) 7.00 779.26 42.04 8.27 955.41 1784.8 128.34 16.44 850.00 790.20 1784.98
103.3 26.32 25.06 0.968 6.884 15.83 8.188 83.26 20.10 0.554 20.66 (5.581) 0.134 14.94 0.806 0.158 18.32 34.23 2.461 0.315 16.30 15.15 34.23
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
Profit before tax & exceptional items Profit / (loss) on sale of trade investment
COMMONSIZE PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2005
( Rs. In crores )
PARTICULARS Net Sales (less of excise duty) Interest and dividend income Other income Increase / Decrease in stock INCOME Raw materials consumed Mfg expenses 48
Purchase of finished and other product Payments to & provision for employ Admn, selling ,distribution & other expenses Interest & Dep.
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
Profit before tax & exceptional items Surplus on pre payment of sales tax loan Provision for diminution in value of invst& loan
49.02 373.13 938.46 423.33 51155.76 1361.36 34.35 (92.00) 1303.71 (451.00) 33.00 885.71 6.86 0.16 790.20 1682.93 146.68 20.90 700.00 815.35 1682.93
0.786 5.989 15.06 6.795 82.76 21.85 0.551 12983752 20.92 7.240 0.529 14.21 0.110 0.002 12.68 27.01 2.354 0.335 11.23 13.08 27.01
49
A cash flow statement, when used in conjunction with the other financial statements, provides information that enables users to evaluate the changes in net assets of an enterprise, its financial structure(including its liquidity and solvency), and its ability to affect the amounts and timing of cash flows in order to adapt to changing circumstances and opportunities. An analysis of cash flow is useful for short run planning. A firm needs sufficient cash to pay debts maturing in the near future, to pay interest and other expenses and to pay dividends to the shareholders. The firm can make projection of cash inflows and cash outflows to determine the availability of cash. This statement indicates the sources and uses of cash. To put in one sentence, this statement analysis the changes in non current account as well as current accounts to determine the flow of cash.
50
(A) Cash Flow from Operating Activities (1)Net Profit before tax &exceptional items Adjustment for: Depreciation Provision for Diminution in Value of Investment Interest expenses Interest Income Dividend Income Profit/Loss on sale of Fixed Assets (Net) Profit on sale of Long Tem Investment (Net) Profit on sale of Current Investment (Net) (2) Operating Profit Before working Capital changes Adjustment for :Trade & Other Receivables Inventories Assets held for disposal Trade Payable (3) Cash generated from Operations Diet Taxes Paid (Net) Cash from operating activities before exceptional item Net Cash from Operating Activities (B) Cash Flow from Investing Activities Sale of Fixed assets Purchase of Investment and fixed assets Sale of Investment Investment/Advances in Joint Venture, Subsidiary & Others Net Proceeds from sale of Current Investment Interest Received Dividend Received Net Cash from/(used in) investment activities (C) Cash Flow from Financing Activities Proceeds from borrowings Repayment of borrowings Interest paid Dividends paid Corporate dividend tax Net Cash from/(used in ) financing activities (D)Net increase/(decrease) in Cash & Cash equivalent Cash &Cash equivalent at beginning of the year Cash &Cash equivalent at end of the year (Cash & Cash equivalent represent Cash & Bank balances)
713.20 254.14 6.36 168.41 (39.67) (34.87) 9.52 (6.37) 1070.72 1.91 8.94 1.42 45.41 1128.40 (160.39) 968.01 968.01 5.65 (1223.39) 30.08 (46.52) 6.37 39.68 34.87 (826.28) 597.14 (516.61) (177.74) (82.73) (179.94) (38.21) 148.32 110.11
1048.37 273.06 153.88 (55.28) (87.32) 0.90 (2.76) (1.79) 1330.06 (64.28) 80.49 2.49 30.75 1379.51 (210.28) 1169.26 1169.26 5.65 (1006.07) 53.64 24.74 1.79 55.28 86.32 (796.65) 410.50 (388.73) (173.66) (91.57) (11.75) (255.21) 117.37 110.11 227.48
1361.36 284.57 138.76 (75.38) (39.37) (2.25) (24.90) (3.37) 1646.42 (78.33) (219.13) 1.84 90.96 1441.76 (391.30) 1050.46 1050.46 19.71 (377.16) 666.13 (1294.15) 3.37 74.29 39.37 (868.44) 326.40 (354.13) (150.11) (128.19) (16.77) (322.80) (140.78) 227.48 86.70
51
BIBLIOGRAPHY
I have referred to the following books and websites in making the final project.
ANNUAL REPORTS.
a. Annual Reports of Grasim Industries Limited of the year 2003. b. Annual Reports of Grasim Industries Limited of the year 2004.
REFERENCE BOOKS.
a. Financial Management (I.M.Pandey). b. Financial Management (Khan & Jain). c. Financial Management (B.S.Shah).
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
52
WEBSITES.
Articles.
53