Disclaimer
This document only reflects the views of the author and not necessarily those of Dresdner Kleinwort research, sales or trading departments. This document is for research or educational purposes only and is not intended to promote any financial investment or security.
Introduction
Cash
Introduction
Key strengths
Sensible model for the behavior of stock prices: random walk / log-normal diffusion Intuitive parameters: spot price, interest rate, volatility Arbitrage argument: dynamic hedging strategy
Key limitations
True or False? Stock prices follow a random walk / a lognormal diffusion False Stock prices are determined by supply and demand which are influenced by countless economic factors. If a company announces bankruptcy, its stock price WILL go down with 100% probability.
Key limitations
True or False? If I buy an option at a higher price than the Black-Scholes price, I will lose money. False Different agents have different uses for options: Bets: individual investors, asset managers Hedging: corporate investors Volatility trading: traders, hedge funds
i.e Black-Scholes is not an arbitrage price in the sense that one loses money when trading at a different level (compared to forward contracts / futures where there is a strong (static) arbitrage.)
Key limitations
True or False? If I buy an option at a price higher than the Black-Scholes price and I follow the Black-Scholes delta-hedging strategy, I will lose money. False but in one case: False in practice: discrete hedging, jumps, stochastic volatility may have a positive impact on P&L False in theory: even if we assume that the realised stock price process is a lognormal diffusion unless we also assume that the realised stock price process follows a lognormal diffusion with the same volatility parameter as the one used to price the option
10
10
So what is Black-Scholes?
NOT a good model for the real behavior of stock prices NOT a good model to determine the fair value of an option: different agents give different values to the same option NOT a good model to arbitrage option prices: too many factors are ignored BUT a powerful, simple toy model to: Understand which factors influence the price of an option and estimate its manufacturing cost Interpret a market quote (more on this in the next section)
11
11
Black-Scholes in Practice
Implied Volatility
12
Black-Scholes in Practice
Input/Output Diagram
Spot Price
Strike Price
Black Scholes
Option Price
13
13
Black-Scholes in Practice
Spot Price
Strike Price
Black Scholes
Option Price
14
14
Black-Scholes in Practice
15
Black-Scholes in Practice
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
16
Black-Scholes in Practice
17
17
Black-Scholes in Practice
+ term structure
ATM Implied volatility
=
1429 1348 1290 1198 1083 968 680 331
20% 10% 0%
Oct-07
Oct-08
Oct-09
Oct-10
Oct-11
18
2831
1970
1659
1544
18
Black-Scholes in Practice
19
19
Black-Scholes in Practice
daily return
-8.00% -6.00% -4.00% -2.00% 0 0.00% -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 SPX Index linear regression 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00%
20
20
21
22
Greeks
The change in option price f resulting from a change in one factor is named sensitivity or Greek:
f S 2 f = 2 S f V= f = t f = r f = q =
Delta Gamma Vega Theta Rho Mu Change in f due to (small) change in spot price Second-order change in f due to (large) change in spot price = Change in due to change in spot price Change in f due to change in implied volatility Change in f due to passage of time Change in f due to change in interest rate Change in f due to change in dividends
23
23
24
24
Hedging
The standard approach to minimize the impact of market factors on the mark-tomarket of an option / a book of options is to offset (hedge) the Greeks with a relevant instrument Example: Delta-hedging Initial Book Delta = $5,000 per S&P 500 index point Delta-hedge = Sell 5,000 units of S&P 500 Final Book Delta = 0. This means that the book mark-to-market value is immune to (small) changes in the level of S&P 500.
25
25
Hedging
To hedge other Greeks than Delta (e.g. Gamma, Vega) our market-maker must trade other instruments. However, it is usually impossible to perfectly hedge all Greeks. This implies that the market-maker is left with some risks. Her job is to design her option book so as to be left with the risks she is comfortable with (e.g. long Vega if she believes volatility is on the rise etc.).
26
26
Trading Volatility
Where does volatility appear in Black-Scholes? Daily option P&L equation Volatility trading equation
27
Trading Volatility
Definition
Taleb: Volatility is best defined as the amount of variability in the returns of a particular asset. [...] Actual volatility is the actual movement experienced by the market. It is often called historical, sometimes historical actual. Implied volatility is the volatility parameter derived from the option prices for a given maturity. Operators use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula (and its derivatives) as a benchmark. It is therefore customary to equate the option prices to their solution using the Black-Scholes-Merton method, even if one believes that it is inappropriate and faulty, rather than try to solve for a more advanced pricing formula.
Dynamic Hedging: Managing Vanilla and Exotic Options, John Wiley & Sons, 1997
28
28
Trading Volatility
Definition
Historical (Realised) Volatility Annualized standard deviation of daily stock returns: Implied Volatility Volatility parameter in Black-Scholes model of stock prices (random walk / lognormal diffusion):
Historical =
where:
252 N (rt r ) 2 N 1 t =1
dS t = dt + Implied dWt St
S rt = ln t St 1
1 r= N
r
t =1
29
29
Trading Volatility
30
30
Trading Volatility
f 1 2 2 2 f f rf = rS + S + S 2 S 2 t
With Greek notations:
1 rf = rS + 2 S 2 + 2
What is ? Realised or Implied?
31
31
Trading Volatility
Realised = Implied =
In reality traders tweak the model through the volatility parameter to make up for the model imperfections. As such they dont believe in the model, they merely use it.
32
32
Trading Volatility
33
Note that Delta P&L, Gamma P&L and Theta P&L correspond to the state variable risks modelled in Black-Scholes, while the Vega P&L, Rho P&L, Mu P&L etc. correspond to parametric risks which are not modelled in Black-Scholes. A more sophisticated model such as stochastic volatility with jumps would transfer some parametric risks (Vega) to the state variable risks universe, leading to different Greeks than Black-Scholes.
33
Trading Volatility
34
34
Trading Volatility
35
35
Trading Volatility
loss
36
36
Trading Volatility
1 2 S 2 Implied 2
Plugging the proxy into the daily option P&L equation:
Daily P & L
1 2 (S ) 2 S 2 Implied t 2 2 1 2 S S Implied t 2 S
)
2
37
37
Trading Volatility
This equation tells us that the daily option P&L on a delta-hedged option position is driven by two factors: Dollar Gamma, which has the role of a scaling factor and does not determine the sign of the P&L Variance Spread (realised vs. implied), which determines the sign of the P&L Thus, a trader who is long dollar gamma will make money if realised variance is higher than implied, break even if they are the same, and lose money if realised is below implied.
38
38
P&L path-dependency
Case study Path-dependency equation
39
P&L path-dependency
Case study
An option market-maker sold a 1-year call struck at 110 on a stock trading at 100 for an implied volatility of 30%, and delta-hedged her position daily until maturity. The realised volatility of the underlying was 27.5% 2 months before maturity, her P&L was up 100,000 Yet her final trading P&L is down 60,000 How did the profits change into losses?
40
40
P&L path-dependency
Case study
The hard life of an option trader...
Stock price 120 Strike = 110 100 80 60 40 20 0
Trading days
14
28
42
56
70
84
98
112
126
140
154
168
182
196
210
224
238
41
252
41
P&L path-dependency
Case study
Realised Volatility and Dollar Gamma
Stock price
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Trading days
Volatility
60% 50% 40% 40% 30% 20% 10%
Strike = 110
Dollar Gamma
0% 56 70 84 98 112 126 140 154 168 182 196 210 224 238 252
14
28
42
42
Note that the graph of the dollar gamma actually corresponds to a short position.
42
P&L path-dependency
Path-dependency equation
Summing all daily option trading P&Ls until maturity, we obtain the pathdependency equation:
2 Final P & L t rt 2 Implied t t =1 N
where t = x (t-1, St-1) x St-12 is the Dollar Gamma at the beginning of day t and rt = (St - St-1)/St-1 is the stock return at the end of day t. With this expression, we can clearly see that the final P&L is the sum of the daily Variance Spread weighted by the Dollar Gamma. Thus, days when Dollar Gamma is high will tend to dominate the final P&L.
43
43
P&L path-dependency
A path-independent derivative?
For the final P&L to be path-independent (in the sense of the equation in the previous page), the Dollar Gamma must be constant. This defines a new type of derivative, the log-contract:
2 f c c t = c = 2 2 = 2 f = c ln S + bS + a S S S
Log-contracts are not traded, but they are closely connected to Variance Swaps introduced in the next section.
44
44
Variance Swaps
Introduction Hedging & Pricing Mark-to-Market Valuation
45
Variance Swaps
Introduction
A variance swap is an exotic derivative instrument where one party agrees to receive at maturity the squared realised volatility converted into dollars for a pre-agreed price:
where:
St is the closing price on day t N is the number of trading days between the trade date and the maturity date 252 is the number of trading days in a year Kvar is the variance strike expressed in volatility percentage points (e.g. 30%) and is not to be confused with the strike of a vanilla option which is a stock price level
46
46
Variance Swaps
Introduction
Example Variance Buyer: Variance Seller: Underlying asset: Start date: Maturity date: Strike (Kvar): [Dresdner] [Sigma LLC] S&P 500 Today Today + 1yr 30% Payoff Calculation Scenario 1
Realised volatility 20% Payoff = $1 x (0.22 0.32) = $-0.05
Thus, the variance buyer (Dresdner) pays 5 cents to the variance seller (Sigma)
Scenario 2
Realised volatility 40% Payoff = $1 x (0.42 0.32) = $0.07
47
47
Variance Swaps
Introduction
Note: Returns are computed on logarithmic basis rather than arithmetic The mean return is not subtracted (zero-mean assumption) In practice the log-returns are multiplied by 100 to convert from decimal to percentage point representation, and the variance strike is quoted in volatility points (30 for 30%) Often the number of variance swap units is calculated from a notional specified in volatility terms (e.g. $100,000 per volatility point):
Variance Notional =
48
48
Variance Swaps
Introduction
Variance Swaps are actively traded on the major equity indices: S&P 500, Nasdaq, EuroStoxx50, Nikkei... Typical bid/offer spread is to 2 volatility points (vegas)
Indic. mids SPX NDX SX5E NKY Nov-05 15.6 16.7 17.4 17.5 Dec-05 15.2 16.6 17.0 17.5 Jan-06 15.3 17.4 16.9 17.4 Mar-06 15.7 17.9 17.5 17.2 Jun-06 16.2 18.9 17.7 17.6 Sep-06 16.6 19.8 18.0 17.8 Dec-06 16.9 20.4 18.6 18.1 Jun-07 17.4 21.3 18.7 18.6 Dec-07 17.8 21.9 19.3 19.2 Jun-08 18.3 22.3 19.6 19.7 Dec-08 18.7 22.6 19.9 20.1 Dec-09 19.6 23.1 20.3 20.4
Source: Dresdner Kleinwort. Data as of October 2005. 49
49
Variance Swaps
Substantially, the difference between equations (1) and (2) lies in the weighting of the squared daily log-returns: Variance Swaps are equally weighted The final P&L of a delta-hedged vanilla option position is Dollar-Gammaweighted
50
50
Variance Swaps
N Put
N Call
51
51
Variance Swaps
K = 75
K = 175 K = 200
Aggregate
52
52
Variance Swaps
* var
where r is the constant interest rate, T is the maturity, Put(k), Call(k) denote the price of a put or call struck at k% of the underlying assets forward price.
53
53
Variance Swaps
Mark-to-Market Valuation
Because variance is additive, the mark-to-market valuation of a variance swap position can be linearly decomposed between past (realised) variance and future (implied) variance:
54
55
55