Chapter

Page

Details

2 99 Text correctio n On the top of page 99, it states that NAT is covered in Chapter 10, 'Network Addr ess Translation.' It should state Chapter 11 . 3 127 Text correction On page 127, near the bottom of the page: The following table shows you an exampl e host range of two subnets in a Class B 240 (/20) subnet mask:" First subnet 16.0 32.0 Second subnet 31.255.47.255 The table should read: First subnet 16.0.31.255 Second subnet 32.0.47.255 3 133 Text correction: Missing digit in broadcast address The third question asks What subnet and broadcast address is the IP address 172.1 6.50.10 255.255.224.0 (/19) a member of? The answer states: 256-224 = 0, 32, 64 (r emember, we always start counting at zero(0)). The subnet is 172.16.32.0, and th e broadcast must be 172.16.63.25 since 64.0 is the next subnet. The answer should state that the the broadcast must be 172.16.63.255 since 64.0 i s the next subnet. 3 138 Text correction Second paragraph under "VLSM Design," second sentence: And if we use a /30 on our WAN links and a /27, /28 and /29 on our LANs, we ll get 2 hosts per WAN interface , and 30, 14 and 8 hosts per LAN interface nice! Should read: ...we ll get 2 hosts per WAN interface and 30, 14 and 6 hosts per LAN interface... since a /29 has 6 usable hosts. 3 143 Errors in Figure 3.7 The bottom left chart, "Class C Network," contains errors. The IP address in the heading, "192.16.10.0," should read: "192.168.10.0" The "Hosts" column has incorrect values for Networks A, B, C and D. Change those values from "12,20,25,4" to "14,30,20,6" The righthand chart also has erroneous IP addresses. All IPs in the righthand chart should begin "192.168" not "192.16" as printed. 1/29/08 1st & 2nd 3 145 Errors in Figure 3.9 The righthand chart contains erroneous IP addresses. All IPs in the chart should begin "192.168," not "192.16" as printed. 3 150 Text correction At the top of the page, the last bullet point contradicts Figure 3.16. The last bullet should read: "172.1.4.0/25" 1/28/08 1st & 2nd 3 168 Text correction: Answers to Written Lab 3.1, Question 3. On page 159, in Written Lab 3.1, number 3, we are asked to write the subnet, bro adcast address and valid host range for 192.168.100.66/27. The answer on page 16 8 states 192.168.100.66/27. A /27 is 255.255.255.224. The fourth octet is a block size of 32. Count by 32s until you pass the host address of 66. 0, 32, 64. The host is in the 32 subnet, broadcast address of 63. Valid host range of 33-62. The last sentence of the answer on page 168 should read: Count by 32s until you p ass the host address of 66. 0, 32, 64, 96. The host is in the 64 subnet, broadca st address of 95. Valid host range is 65-94. 2/5/08 1st & 2nd

3 168 Text correction: Answers to Written Lab 3.1, Question 10 The last sentence in the answer begins: The subnet is in the 16.2.0 subnet... It should read: The host is in the 16.2.0 subnet... 2/5/08 1st & 2nd 3 169 Answers to Written Lab 3.3 Line 4, under "Number of Hosts" The answer given, 16,384, is incorrect. The correct answer is 16,382. 11/19/07 1st & 2nd 4 227 Text correction In the first sentence, there is an extraneous hyphen in the command. "http-secure-server" should read "http secure-server" 5/1/08 1st 2nd & 3rd 5 285 Error in Table 5.5 The Description for "Platform" (line 5 in the table) is incorrect. It should read: "The type of Cisco device directly connected. In the previous output, the Corp r outer is directly connected to a 1242 Access point, a Cisco 2801 and two 1841 ro uters." 2/6/08 1st & 2nd 6 341 Text correction: Error in Figure 6.9 On the left side of the figure the two IP addresses given do not match the inter faces to which they are assigned on the CORP and R1 routers. 10.1.2.0 should go with the S0/0/0 interface, and 10.1.3.0 should go with the S0 /0/1 interface, as shown in Table 6.1 on the next page. 9/30/09 1st 6 351 Text correction: Incorrect hostnames in sample output In the first set of output near the top of the page, some lines have the hostnam e as "R2" and some have "R3". All hostnames in the example should be "R2". 2/27/08 6 365 Text correction At the bottom of the page, under "Corp(config)#do show ip route" lines 7 and 8 c ontain errors. "Serial0/0/1" and "Serial0/0/0" have been reversed. "Serial0/0/1" goes with "10.1.2.0" and "Serial0/0/0" goes with "10.1.3.0" 5/1/08 1st 6 394 Text correction In the second paragraph after the command output, the first sentence: "Notice fu rther down that RIP is routing for directly connected interfaces f0/1 and s0/0/0 ." contradicts the above output. The sentence should read: "...directly connected interfaces f0/1 and s0/0/1." 2/6/08 1st & 2nd 6 407 Answers to Review Questions, Question 1. Superflous numbering. There are 5 possible answers, A. through E. The list should read as follows: 1. Gateway(config)#ip route ... 2. Gateway(config)#router rip Gateway(config-router)#network 206... 3. Gateway(config)#router rip Gateway(config-router)#network 206... 4. Gateway(config)#ip route 206... 5. Gateway(config)#ip def... 10/29/07 1st & 2nd 6 415 Text correction: Answers to Written Lab 6 Answer to question 1. Add " 150" to the end of the route, so the answer reads: "1. ip route 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.20.1 150" 1/28/08 1st & 2nd 7 427 Text correction: Error in Figure 7.3 On the left side of the figure the two IP addresses given do not match the inter

faces to which they are assigned on the CORP and R1 routers. 10.1.2.0 should go with the S0/0/0 interface, and 10.1.3.0 should go with the S0 /0/1 interface, as shown in Table 6.1 on the next page. 11/11/09 1st, 5th & 6th 7 462 Text correction: Error in Table 7.4 In the first line of the table, under "Description/Function", "Shows Hello packe ts being sent and received on your router" should read: "Shows Hello packets being received on your router." 2/6/08 1st & 2nd 9 580 Error in Figure 9.12 in the third printing Please note: This correction applies ONLY to the 3rd printing. Figure 9.12 is co rrect in the 1st and 2nd printings, and will be corrected for printings followin g the 3rd. In the router configuration accompanying the graphic, all #'s have been replaced with ?'s. Wherever a ? appears, replace it with #. 8/13/08 3rd 10 668 Answers to Written Lab 10.1 Superfluous numbering. Some answers appear on two lines, but the second line has been numbered, inserting unneded numbers into the sequence and resulting in the appearance of 18 answers for 10 questions. The list should read as follows: 1. access-list 10 deny 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 10 permit any 2. ip access-group 10 out 3. access-list 10 deny host 192.168.15.5 access-list 10 permit any 4. show access-lists 5. show running-config sh ip interface 6. access-list 110 deny tcp host 172.16.10.1 host 172.16.30.5 eq 23 access-list 110 permit ip any any 7. line vty 0 4 access-class 110 in 8. ip access-list standard No172Net deny 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit any 9. ip access-group No172Net out 10. show ip interfaces 9/5/07 1st 11 679 Text correction: improper range of IP addresses in example In the first paragraph after the command output, the fourth sentence, which begi ns: "The second answer..." contains incorrect IP addresses. The sentence should read, in its entirety: "The second answer would end up with the exact same result of having only 192.1. 2.109 as your inside global, but you can type this in and have it work too: ip n at pool Todd 102.1.2.105 192.1.2.110 netmask 255.255.255.248." The range 192.1.2.109 through 192.1.2.114 spans two separate /29 subnets 1/28/08 1st & 2nd 12 735 Text correction: Incorrect information in explanation for the an swer to Review Questions 2. and 4. In the explanations for the answers to Review Questions 2. and 4., the IEEE wiri ng standard 802.11b is mentioned twice. In both instances, it should read:

""The IEEE 802.11b and IEEE 802.11g standards" 11/11/09 1st - 6th 13 770 Review Questions: Error in Question 11. Answer B. should read: "Router1(config-if)#ipv6 rip 1 enable" 2/6/08 1st & 2nd Sybex Test Engine on CD-R, Chapter 6, Question 15 The question refers to Router Output, but none is given. Below is the output you are to consider: Corp#sh ip route [output cut] R 192.168.215.0 [120/2] via 192.168.20.2, 00:00:23, Serial0/0 R 192.168.115.0 [120/1] via 192.168.20.2, 00:00:23, Serial0/0 R 192.168.30.0 [120/1] via 192.168.20.2, 00:00:23, Serial0/0 C 192.168.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0 C 192.168.214.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 5/20/08 Sybex Test Engine on CD-R, Chapter 6, Question 17 The question refers to a routing table, but none is shown. Here is the output yo u are to consider: R 192.168.30.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.40.1, 00:00:12, Serial0 C 192.168.40.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 172.16.30.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 R 192.168.20.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.40.1, 00:00:12, Serial0 R 10.0.0.0/8 [120/15] via 192.168.40.1, 00:00:07, Serial0 C 192.168.50.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0