Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Return of Gandhi: The Death of the West in India
The Return of Gandhi: The Death of the West in India
The Return of Gandhi: The Death of the West in India
Ebook979 pages11 hours

The Return of Gandhi: The Death of the West in India

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

The Return of Gandhi by Ray Songtree is the Indian edition of Vol 2 of the Lipstick and War Crimes Series, with a special Indian introduction. This edition includes an insider's view of the Gandhi incarnation and his role in moving Hindustan toward dependency, due to fact that his spiritual coordinates were confused. Aurobi

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMay 14, 2018
ISBN9781941293386
The Return of Gandhi: The Death of the West in India

Related to The Return of Gandhi

Related ebooks

Asian History For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Return of Gandhi

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    The Return of Gandhi - Ray Songtree

    Kauai Transparency Initiative International

    Since we are all psychic, there is no such thing as intellectual property. Intellectual property is an oxymoron. The two words do not combine to make a rational statement because the intellect has no form, and property allegedly does. What intellectual property could mean is we don’t want others to take advantage of our work. It can also mean that a for-profit corporation registers whatever it wants and claims it has the legal right to restrict access. In this way nature and even creativity is being commodified. The law is based on an oxymoron.

    The author makes no claim to own any concepts in this writing, nor any of the images. The intent of this writing is educational and all revenues will go back into the promotion of education through non-profit Kauai Transparency Initiative International. The use of possibly copyrighted material for critique or eduction comes under Fair Use in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this book for purposes of your own, that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Otherwise, portions of this book may be used for non-profit distribution as per Creative Commons License. Please purchase books from which excerpts were taken. See endnotes. Although the author and publisher have made every effort to ensure that the information in this writing was correct at press time, the author and publisher do not assume and hereby disclaim any liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident, or any other cause.

    Mission Statement: Kauai Transparency Initiative International believes that human nature is loving. Right to know leads to informed choice which leads to local stewardship. When government and industry are honest and open with citizens and consumers, people will naturally choose health for themselves and future generations.

    A mother protects her child. KTII exists to help causes that work for transparency and disclosure. The goal is an informed loving society on Kauai and afar, brought about by tipping society toward responsible awareness through honest education.

    KTII was founded by Ray Songtree in 2011. See KTII.org.

    ISBN 978-1-941293-36-2

    ISBN 978-1-941293-38-6 (e-book)

    Beneath this flame

    the melting candle inside me

    Before me,

    your pearl eyes

    Your elegant skin

    caressing

    the light of my mind

    – Ray Songtree 1976

    Thank you Mom, Ontshauwan, Penny, Diana, and Riza

    Introduction to the Indian Edition Vol. 2 Lipstick and War Crimes

    The control of the young mind in its most impressionable period is of vital importance to the continuance of the hypnotic spell by which alone, the foreign domination manages to subsist.

    – Aurobindo 1907

    It might be odd for my millions of friends in India to hear the words that Western progress spells destruction for India. However, this was one of Gandhi’s messages. I understand that many people in India worship Gandhi and many others despise him. I will help sort this out for Indian readers.

    Let us remember that there will never be a utopia, so progress is not moving toward anything realistic. Perhaps I should repeat that … There will never be a utopia, therefore, progress is a daydream. In the trance of progress, our modern civilization is creating a horrible future for future incarnations of ourselves and 2 million other species. In fact, the road to our daydream of utopia is polluted and increasingly stealing from the natural world and the natural human.

    Progress tells us that the world is just dirt, but the world is actually living natural communities, filled with plants and animals that dream, sing, and know each other. This is what progress disgards as dirt. Progress sees living natural communities as resources to be used up as soon as possible, leaving a wasteland.

    Progress is just an excuse to change what already exists. The ancient is converted into the disposable. This exciting transformation does not consider the futility of a temporary fix. A bandage does not cure a disease. A thousand bandages do not cure a disease. Something is hurting the ancient life here on earth. How is this progress?

    Here on Earth, progress depends on resource extraction and is measured by consumerism. If we are obese and diabetic, have we progressed? Australia and U.S. have 37% obesity rate. Is this the kind of progress India desires. To be fat? As Indians are exposed to more wireless frequencies and more processed food and more polluted water, will disease increase? The answer is known.

    Consumerism has never been considered wise behavior by any spiritual person. Grasping for sensual gratification, finally, is seen as grasping, and one finds nothing to hold dear. Most people don’t arrive at this wisdom until they grow old. You, the reader, don’t have time for that. This book was written for younger people to wake up now and save your world.

    * * *

    Let us ask, Isn’t Western utopian progress nothing more than grasping for comfort, while destroying nature? Is this not what we actually see?

    What will a hydro-electric dam on the Ganges bring? The dam will fill with sediment. And how much of India will be polluted by factories powered by this temporary electricity?

    Another example of a temporary destructive transformation are railroads which do not add, they subtract from nature. They are built, not to heal the land, but to extract from the land.

    Computers and cell phones only speed the assault.

    Free trade means the world’s central banks (which are controlled by the Rothschild Bank of International Settlements in Basel Switzerland) stay in business by adjusting currency rates, interest rates and manipulating nations. Free Trade, embodied in international efforts such as GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), and TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership) expose sovereign nations to predatory multi-national companies, who destroy local markets and hire the most desperate populations for their factories. The factories are free to pollute, because the political leaders are bought off by the corporations, or forced at gun point by CIA type black ops to take the money or take the lead. Bullets.

    Free trade is not free, it is slavery trade. What appears like employment in India that is servicing overseas corporations, is really only the global temporary materialistic civilization paying Indian workers to convert nature in other lands into commodities.

    Free trade means free exploitation. Job outsourcing just speeds the assault.

    Excerpt from The Rothschild Colonization of India

    -http://rothschildcolonizationiindia.blogspot.com/

    Do you know why Europe and the U.S are so rich, while countries like India are so poor? You might be thinking its because they are already developed and advanced and we’re still a developing country … Blah! Read on … India was already a highly developed" and advanced civilization for 4000+ years when the British stepped on our shores and it is entirely because of the British that we became backward and underdeveloped to this day.

    "So how did they do it? Simple. They indulged in outright, shameless THIEVERY that continues to this day at various levels through various means …

    In 1600, the East India Company was granted the Charter to trade with India. It started sending bands of sea pirates in ships masked as merchants". These sea pirates began landing on the shores of India and started setting up armed forts at various places such as Chennai.

    "The Rothschild family came to own the trading company British East India Company that began in 1600. After conquering Bengal in India, the Rothschilds set up a notoriously corrupt system of administration, whose sole objective was to shamelessly plunder the riches of Bengal, which was the richest province in the entire world at that time. Bengal was literally turned into a graveyard of death and desolation … Tens of millions of the poor were eliminated through the spread of diseases like the bubonic plague …

    "The Nawabs, Rajahs and Zamindars were robbed of their priceless treasures. The Rothschilds then moved this entire horde of tons of gold, looted from the people of Bengal, to London. It was with this gold that the Rothschild family set up the privately owned Bank of England.

    When Indians revolted in the year 1857, they were told [to mollify them] that the East India Company was abolished and India will be administered directly by the CROWN. What Indians do not know to this day, is the fact that CROWN does not mean the King or Queen of Britain but a privately owned Corporation of London" headed again by the Rothschilds who owned the East India Company! Indians were tricked and cheated with a simple name change! The exploitation and robbery of India, its resources and people continued till 1947 under this CROWN.

    In 1947, India and its people were again tricked into believing that we were granted Independence through the complicity of Pandit Nehru. Under secret orders from the Rothschilds, given to him through his Jewish girl friend Edwina Mountbatten, who is a close relative of the British Queen, Nehru turned India and its people into rag tag clad beggars by aligning India with the Soviet Union, which was another creation of the Jewish bankers.

    [The Bolsheviks were funded by Rothschild plant Jacob Schiff in New York City, and Lenin was funded by Rothschilds in Switzerland. Marx and Mao were also funded by Rothschilds. Israel Epstein wrote Mao’s Little Red Book.]

    The Kohinoor Diamond which was robbed by Robert Clive was presented to the British Queen.

    Today the richest people in the country are undoubtedly the politicians who continue their thievery and robbery of India for the East India Company Rothschilds banking family as their BENAMI frontmen. 800 million Indians live at less than 50 rupees per day, while our Parliament is full of politicians who are millionaires! The Rothschilds are now married into the British Royal Family and many aristocratic families of Europe.

    Whitewashing the Past

    by Mike Marqusee May 24, 2002 –http://appiusforum.net/guardian_article.html

    According to the British Library, its new exhibition on the East India Company shows how the work of 11 men, from a cold, wet and then relatively poor country, paved the way for what is now called ‘globalization’. The exhibition’s principal sponsor is Standard Chartered Bank, the world’s leading bank for emergent markets, whose chairman, Sir Patrick Gillam, lauds the courageous, creative and truly international legacy of the East India Company".

    Until recently, the champions of today’s world trade order have usually given imperial parallels a wide berth. They prefer to promote globalization as a universal and secular creed, not a hangover from the colonial era … [But that is exactly and precisely what it is.]

    The exhibition has attracted criticism for downplaying the [East India] company’s role as the biggest drug trafficker of all time, and its responsibility for the deaths of 17 million Chinese from opium addiction …

    Clive’s victory at Plassey in 1757 secured direct company rule over Bengal, then the richest province in India. The immediate upshot was the tripling of the land tax and a famine that killed 10 million people—one-third of the population. Two decades later, as a result of Cornwallis’s permanent settlement, which imposed English landlordism on Bengal, 20 million small land holders were dispossessed. Indigenous industries were crippled by the company’s exactions.

    With the end of its monopoly in 1813, the import [at gunpoint] of mill-made goods from Britain devastated the once-mighty Indian textile industry. The misery hardly finds parallel in the history of commerce, said the governor general, William Bentinck. The bones of the cotton weavers are bleaching the plains of India.

    Perhaps in ways neither the British Library nor Standard Chartered Bank intended, this long discredited, blood-drenched monopoly, licensed by the English state and backed by its military resources [who were the security guards for the real bosses, the Rothschilds], does offer an apt precedent for our current lopsided but frantic commercial order.

    In its day, the company occupied and manipulated the interstices of a truly global economy. Tea from China was bought with opium from India; Indian and later British textiles (made from cotton grown in India) purchased slaves in west Africa, who were sold in the Americas for gold and silver, which was invested in England, where the sugar harvested by the slaves ensured a booming market for the tea from China. The big winners sat in the City of London. The more numerous losers could be found in every corner of the globe.

    The conquest of the earth … is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much, Joseph Conrad observed in Heart of Darkness. What redeems it is the idea only … The idea in this exhibition is trade—an abstraction carefully disengaged from the forms it takes in the real world. As portrayed by the British Library, the company was ever guided by the invisible hand of the market, driven across the seas by the ineluctable laws of supply and demand. [Which magically are laws of supply and demand without any human accountability.]

    The early managers of the company were more realistic. Josiah Child, one of its leading figures during the last quarter of the 17th century, explained its priorities: The increase of our revenue is the subject of our care, as much as our trade: ‘tis that must maintain our force …

    [In other words, it was not market demand, it was thievery and forced monopoly at gun point.]

    Since the most reliable sources of revenue at the time were rent and taxes, the company had to establish such a politie of civil and military powers … as may be the foundation of a large, well-grounded, sure English dominion in India for all time to come. The company was seeking profit, not trade, and it was in pursuit of profit that it turned to armed conquest. [To steal.] …

    A deeper link on this –http://rense.com/general53/hen.htm

    A future of destroying the ancient is disaster

    A good example of ongoing extraction by the Rothschild globalists is that the New Delhi government still allows Monsanto Inc. and other bio-tech companies to sell genetically modified seed to Indian farmers.

    GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) seed does not guarantee better harvests, it guarantees dependency, because the crops are designed to never germinate. Only the first generation of most GMO seed can be used for planting. This makes the farmer dependent on buying their seed every year. The population is now dependent on a few corporations for survival.

    In Iraq, 7000 years of seed saving was replaced by Monsanto total control of seed, in the lie of liberating Iraq. Iraq was not saved from Saddam Hussein, but rather, he was eliminated to make Iraq a slave state of the conquerers. What was Saddam Hussein’s crime?—He did not allow a Rothschild central bank. As soon as the West invaded, a Rothschild central bank was set up. This occurred in Sudan and Libya as well and is occurring at time of this writing in Syria. India’s Rothschild central bank arrived a century ago.

    Genetically modified (GMO) foods is part of a long range plan for total control of world food supply. Everything from money to food to communications is to be centralized, if we allow it. This is called full spectrum dominance. Everything means everything! This also requires standardizing and centralizing our values, our desires, our expectations. This is the subject of the book … our socially engineered values.

    Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook is studying war criminal Henry Kissinger’s book World Order. Facebook is building giant high flying, solar powered drones to bring internet dependency and cultural destruction to remote isolated communities. Everyone must be connected by the globalists so the one world mono-culture can replace our inequality. The fact that other cultures are obliterated is not by accident, it is intentional, as was the conversion of Bengal from wealth to poverty.

    The word sustainable

    As we will explore, industrial civilization is not sustainable, because endless growth on a planet with limited area and resources cannot sustain endless growth.

    When the UN uses the word ‘sustainable’, as in their grand plan of Sustainability 2030, they mean sustainable growth, but this is an oxymoron. Growth and steady state sustainability (as 6000 cultures had before industrialization) are contradictory. We either want steady state sustainability for diverse cultures as the Earth had, or growth for the elite who consolidate everything and extract what they want.

    Growth cannot be shared, because growth is based on creating losers who are robbed.

    The globalists who want to exploit everyone and everything have a problem with too many people. They realized this long ago when Thomas Robert Malthus pointed out in 1798 that population would out strip resources. For this reason, secret diseases and induced infertility have already been deployed. (See sanctioned disease in glossary.)

    In order for the rich to maintain their level of consumption and help make the world suitable for technocratic efficiency to keep THEIR dominance in place, all these extra people have to be eliminated. This must happen before they riot and mess up the globalists’ infrastructure. You see, they think that they own the planet and you and I. They think they own us. So if there are too many of us, they will cull the herd.

    The reasons for reducing population are indeed valid if the human species of 6000 isolated diverse cultures want to each achieve a steady state sustainability. I am saying, that whether the globalists are arrested as criminals or not, we do need to reduce population. When we expose the criminals, each region will need to arrive at a truly sustainable population ideal, or starvation will do the job.

    Again, whenever the UN globalists talk about sustainability, they are not meaning a steady state lifestyle which reduces waste to zero. This is what sustainability looked like for millions of years … zero waste, no impact.

    Again, what the UN elite globalists means by oxymoron phrases such as sustainable growth or sustainable development is THEIR growth, THEIR development. What they mean is that they will continue living off of everyone else, because economic growth always means wealth concentration. This is what we are seeing with corporate mergers. The investors have management plans to sustain THEIR relative wealth, while everyone else’s portion becomes smaller. (See resource depletion in glossary.)

    Monsanto in India

    Monsanto Inc. is part of the plan of total control. For this reason all genetically modified plants and organisms should be banned in India, as Russia is in process of. India should look forward to community self-sufficiency without dependency on any imports. India should look forward to a return to it’s ancient sustainable lifestyle.

    I’m sure that high tech friends who are reading this can’t believe I wrote that, but that is what we are studying. We are studying a realistic sustainable future, not a pipe dream based on endless growth, endless pollution, and endless consumerism. Why are we even thinking about this? Because it is the only thing worth thinking about!

    Genetically modified crops are unhealthy because of the herbicides and pesticides used in the farming technique, and are also unhealthy to other species due to the unnatural genes drifting into the wild. Please try web search GMO genetic drift.

    Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup which makes mechanical weed elimination by tractor unnecessary. Monsanto GMO crops can survive the herbicide. Thus, the farmer has less work by using the chemical weed killer instead of mechanical method, and still have a crop that survives the chemical. The GMO varieties are engineered, not for any altruistic reason like feeding the world. but are the business model of selling the persistent and toxic chemicals called glyphosate and glufosinate which is in the herbicide.

    Farmers think they will make more money because the herbicide is cheaper than traditional ways to stop the weeds, however, the true price will be paid by all of us as disease.

    Glyphosate has been designated as a probable carcinogen by UN. Glyphosate also kills the beneficial bacteria in the gut of all creatures, including humans. Many people now have digestive problems due to the glyphosate in their food. 97% of American babies have glyphosate in their bodies. 97% of Americans and Europeans have glyphosate in their urine.

    Not only is glyphosate carcinogenic, it also is a synthetic amino acid which disrupts normal DNA and RNA replication. This is extremely dangerous.

    In order to ban glyphosate and glufosinate from India, Monsanto Inc. will need to be banned. In order to ban Monsanto, India will need to ban the Rothschild central bank. Only then will India gain it’s independence. (Proof of the Rothschild—Monsanto connection upcoming.)

    What I have just said is that India will be dying of poisons and genetic diseases if Indians do not finally break away from the East India Company. Yes you read that correctly. India is still owned by the East India Company, that is, the Rothschild central banking world order.

    The better vision of the future

    Farmers who re-plant the best ancient seed lines from their own regions, can save India. The local organic way was and is sustainable as a steady state model, and should be supported.

    The obstacle is well known to all … If someone with an advertising budget temporarily loses profit and complains, then the money controlled media which influences voters, and the money controlled parliament will resist new laws to protect local farmers from the big money.

    However, survival for all trumps profit for the few. We must return to local resilience. We must refuse to be compromised. The long term local vision is worthy. This local vision is based on sovereignty, not dependency. This vision insures diversity. We don’t want to see one mono-culture on one centrally controlled planet. We want nature to survive and nature means diversity. If you think about it, diversity comes with isolation, not mixing.

    The short sighted global vision of maximum extraction to meet commercially created demand that benefits the top managers only, is a crime.

    The short sighted vision of a seemingly happy life in the cities, separate from nature, and dependent on energy intensive transportation is not sustainable. It cannot survive. It will starve.

    The local rural vision, with ancient roots, is the path forward. Only this has a long term future. This is the path of health.

    Roads will crack and turn to weeds as surely as fossil fuels will become too deep to extract. Every railroad track will rust away including the most modern international rail systems. They are surface bandages on an internally sick society.

    It is addiction that prevents us from becoming more simple in our consumption, and it is a sense of vain entitlement that makes us resist common sense. As I will show, much of Gandhian thought was just common sense, but as I will also show, much of his thought was confused.

    Deprogramming from Sanskrit psychology

    The population problem in India is held in place by the caste system mentality, in which many people do not feel accountable for their own choices. Like Buddha, Gandhi disdained the caste system in which winners controlled and exploited losers. One can imagine that this injustice set Gandhi against Hinduism, as Buddha articulated 2600 years ago. In confusion, Gandhi was traditional and anti-tradition. His confusion was a sign of his intelligence.

    For thousands of years, the channeled (not Earthly) Sanskrit system of classification has maintained stratification.

    This habitual mind programming works to limit most people’s sense of having options. This is rationalized within each slave, because the social environment backs up the programming; we are actively oppressed by those at the top of the heap, who benefit from harvesting other people’s energy. The physical reality for slaves indeed justifies the mind programming of accepting slavery as normal. However, the spirit knows this is a lie.

    Believe it or not, for India to return to a steady state sustainable chance of survival, within the limits of her land base, she will need to throw out the Sanskrit classification habit. (I discuss this more in an upcoming book about Dr. Steven Greer, who once walked as Paramahansa Yogananda.)

    Before the present era of remembered mythology and history, 100% of Indians did live full lives. This was before Sanskrit arrived to classify and stratify society. Nature was already here before our present beliefs were here, and we were here living naturally with lives of direct power and family.

    Aurobindo—Hinduism … sets one ideal for the saint, another for the man of action, a third for the trader, a fourth for the serf. To prescribe the same ideal for all is to bring about varnasanskara, the confusion of duties [within the belief system], and destroy society [as modeled by the belief system], and race. If we are content to be serfs then indeed, boycott is a sin for us, not because it is a violation of love, but because it is a violation of the sudras’s duty of obedience and contentment. pp 79 Eclipse of the Hindu Nation: Gandhi and His Freedom Struggle (abbreviated to Eclipse for remainder)

    In other words, it is a sin to resist being a slave! A sudra, or slave, should love his or her own oppression and be content, without rights and without respect!

    Aurobindo resisted British (Rothschild) injustice because it was from foreigners, while native Indian injustice found in Hinduism was what to him? The author Radha Rajan uses the excerpt to argue for varna. It is unclear from the short excerpt if Aurobindo was honoring the idea of varnasanskara or exposing it.

    Abuse? They are just serfs after all. This mind programming came with the channeled messages, not from nature, not from natural living, not from Earth, but from the supposed divine, the sacred scriptures.

    Gandhi, though eschewing the caste system later in his life, showed us in his early life, a similar supremacist stratifying prejudice toward a pre-Sanskrit way of life …

    Gandhi— Ours is one continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir [the ancient natives of South Africa] whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife and, then, pass his life in indolence and nakedness … Bombay, Sept 26, 1896

    Gandhi—"The definition of the term ‘uncivilized races’ is an insult to the Indians concerned, and more so to their descendants. An infallible test of civilization is that a man claiming to be civilized should be an intelligent toiler, that he should understand the dignity of labour … One can understand the necessity of registration of Kaffirs who will not work, but why should registration be required for indentured Indians who have become free? … p. 94 Eclipse

    The British government introduced a 1 pound poll tax in addition to the exiting hut tax, to encourage [coerce] native African men to enter the labour market. p 140 Eclipse

    The Sanskrit version of human supremacism with a hierarchy of artificiality over the grand mystery of the natural, is mirrored by the system of Moses, which spawned Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and much more as we will study.

    I am pointing out, that the great religions are much more similar and corrupt than the simple understanding of those near the Earth who see spirit in all forms, and not handed down from heaven to a lowly samsara and wheel of re-birth. The simple understanding is more worthy in my opinion. Incarnation is where flowers bloom and where our character must adapt to meet the next horizon. Ascension and moksha is where we seek escape from responsibility. This has been called bliss. Bliss does not feed children.

    For many many thousands of years, celestial guidance has created prejudice against those near the Earth. This was shown in young Gandhi’s default cultural prejudice that modern toiling was more civilized than hunt and gather freedom. Please note the tinge of pride in his young brash banner of civilization. I call this disconnecting vanity. Later in his lifetime, he would defend the indolence of spinning one’s own cotton rather than slaving to earn a wage to buy clothing from a factory.

    From what I have come to understand, thousands of years ago, an outside force came to Egypt, China, India, Middle and South America. Sanskrit is an extra terrestrial language. Whether one calls this divine, demonic, or ET, Sanskrit came complete, and did not evolve here. Like the pyramids of Egypt, this level of precision arrived from somewhere else and has played out for thousands of years to manifest now as environmental catastrophe.

    Do you know why India is deforested? It is because of modern medicine that did not respect that for a population to retain healthy genes which are resistant to disease, children that are weak must not grow up. But divide and conquer science thought it was superior than nature. And now the forests are being destroyed to cook the next meal for the people who do not have natural resistance to disease. As stated, both nature and the natural human are being assaulted.

    Systems of classification work to divide and conquer the universe for the pyramid of abuse. In the Hindu system, the higher castes have the right to oppress the lower castes.

    If one thinks that one is born into a caste, then one lives in a cage. For women in many places, being born in a woman’s body is a cage, but being born in a man’s body is also a cage. Yet, these role distinctions are needed for families to function. An intelligent person will not find an easy answer here. It is one thing for a family to function well using designated roles for men and women. That is natural, but caste is not found world wide as family is. Where did caste come from in India?

    Some people say that one must have a caste, because the scriptures say so! Then, anyone with a heart should throw out the scriptures because caste creates losers! There was natural diversity and freedom before the channeled scriptures arrived. There were no rules for compassion. There was just compassion.

    I see the kids in the streets

    With not enough to eat

    Who am I to be blind?

    Pretending not to see their needs?

    – Michael Jackson

    I have revisited my past lives, and my times in other realms. Heaven is not heaven. The scriptures of every land are steeped in self-interest by these ascended beings that did the channeling. These beings who channeled divine messages were simply staking out a population of mind controlled slaves for their own purposes. I know this as a certainty, because I was once one of these ascended personalities.

    One solution to the prison of caste has been to escape the cities where everyone is relatively anonymous and thus more free. Urban freedom is a new cage in which no one touches the Earth for livelihood, but is dependent on symbols of energy called money. This makes the individual a cog in a machine, which is built upon an education/employment model, which, in turn, is based on growth. Growth depends on finding cheap labor. Growth is based on competition, not altruism. Remember, the whole system cannot grow forever on a limited planet, it can only condemn some people to being losers. This is held in place so others feel like they are winners.

    The freedom of the cities invites people to be fragmented cogs in the factories of unsustainable consumerism. Anonymous city employment is not freedom from caste, it is a new prison.

    Society built on envy

    Even for the rich, growth has limits. There is a limit to how much wine one can drink, how many orgasms one can have, how many palaces one can manage, and this gets boring. Yet, even the rich who have more comfort and titillation than they need, are seeking more, more, more. What are they then really seeking? Please think about this.

    (Perhaps I should inform the reader now that I do not give answers and I do not want to inspire followers. I want the reader to ask questions. I want you to come up with diverse solutions for your community. I cannot give you your answers. My hope is to encourage you to question everything. By deprogramming your habitual thinking, I hope you will see new paths to explore. You will need them.)

    And why does everyone else emulate the rich? The Pharaohs of Egypt and the Rajas of old and the Emperor of China, and the Sultans, etc, etc, had fancy furniture. Then, we slaves think we need furniture also. We are slaves of envy. Simple natural people just sit on a mat or on the ground. But we slaves who emulate our masters think we need to destroy forests to have a proper chair!

    The economic goal of most people is social status, with insane royalty as their benchmark. What are we seeking?

    Ultimately, social status is proven to our selves by power over others. I call this the pyramid of abuse. This was the origin of the caste system, where some were entitled to extract from the energy of others.

    The steps of abuse are surveillance, classification, inventory, and then extraction by those with the longest spear or, and this is important, those with the most perverse minds.

    Divide and conquer psychology

    Here I would like to share that the reason children are taught mathematics in school is to steal them away from natural thinking and feeling. We each have ten fingers and do not need mathematics. Instead of communing with all that surrounds us, our children are taught to divide and conquer the universe, life, themselves. This is not just some Cartesian head trip coming out of Europe. This is also the psychology and pathology of Sanskrit. Classifying the Universe. You see, dear reader, it is not just the West that is tainted.

    The Brahmanic System was shown by Buddha and recently by Gandhi to be abusive and vain. Again, it is based on the God given entitlement to take from others, to benefit me me me. Globalization has this same abuse mentality built into it. Only when we step outside a system can we see it. The Hindu tradition outside of India is called Brahmanism, which insures losers. The Globalist system, seen from the indigenous perspective, is called the dominant culture.

    The hierarchy of Sanskrit and the Moses Bible and the hierarchy of the present global financial system are parallel and connected. Cosmologies and economic models are based upon management which is based upon centralization, and centralization is parasitic upon the unclassifiable mysterious diversity of nature.

    The purpose of classification is organized extraction. Mystics do not divide and conquer nature, only thieves do so.

    Monotheism and Brahmanism share the channeled habit of classifying. Although Hinduism is seen by many as a pluralistic world view, it still contains a managerial cosmology. In both Moses channeled Judaism and in Brahmanism there is a top and bottom. Indigenous tribal people so not need a top and do not discriminate against a bottom. They don’t need to manage nature because they are not thieves.

    The psychology of dividing is related to the psychology of conquering. When one sees the Earth as one’s family, one does not steal. When one sees the Earth as samsara, then?

    It is almost impossible for people from Eurasia to understand that human beings are not superior to other plants or animals. There are many cultures that could hear the songs of other beings, because they did not become enslaved by scripture.

    How many Hindus protest the damming of rivers?

    Do we fail to protest because we are part of a pyramid of abuse and accustomed to taking orders from an elite? Are we obedient serfs?

    Are we obedient and dutiful as Aurobindo mentioned?

    The history of exploitation

    The vanity that disconnects us from empathy and compassion, makes us each a reliable building block for the pyramid of abuse.

    The problem starts with our own vanity. I call this syndrome, disconnecting vanity, (see glossary). We are stratified into thinking that we are segments of society, rather than feeling that I am whole or simply I am.(Personal sovereignty).

    Our spiritual windows indeed are covered by a blinding dust of self importance or disconnecting vanity in which we place our selves above or below others. When we are innocent, we can see the mystery without naming it. When we are vain, we can only stratify, classify, and exploit. We want to be the king of the mountain, after all.

    * * *

    I would like the reader to please understand that I am not saying that utopia is possible if we could just bust these problematic mind programs. By critiquing classification and abuse systems, I am not saying that anyone will arrive at some perfect alternative. I am not saying that perfection is our goal, because we will never get there.

    I am indeed saying that each individual can be more or less disconnected, and an entire civilization, even an entire era can be disconnected. And as anyone can see with our dying oceans and rivers and skies and soils, something is very disconnected. (Chapter 6)

    I am also saying that it is advantageous to the rulers, that we slaves are dumbed down, fragmented and not whole. The rulers want we slaves blind to our own innate sovereignty as individuals who exist freely in this life. So attacking freedom is the key to dominance. The ruler wants to make sure his slaves are dependent. This is key to the problems facing the planet. What is the opposite of dependency? Rulers don’t want you to know.

    The ruler does not even want you to consider it. The ruler wants his slaves to be vain and sensual and envious and grasping outwardly. If we slaves had a whole, untainted, sovereign spiritual openness, then we would be wild, undomesticated, uncontrollable. This is what freedom looks like to the civilized.

    Two asides: The reason the dominant culture massacres indigenous peoples is that it might take centuries to domesticate and assimilate them, and since stealing their land is the goal, it is more expedient for the thieves to kill them. The greed creates the callousness, and the greed is based on the vain project of climbing the cosmic ladder away from simplicity. If the dominant culture believed in simplicity, it would not try to be dominant.

    The reason Africans are so talented as musicians and dancers, is that they are more true and less domesticated than Europeans and Asians. Ask yourself Why is world music dominated by disproportionate number of African artists? Why?

    I am saying that deprogramming (spiritual awakening) heals disconnection. When we are more connected and less stratified, we care for each other and the Earth. We then stop grasping outwardly for symbols of status. We consume less. That is how we show our care. We don’t take more than we need.

    When we have empathy, like many natural living indigenous tribes have, we share. In nature, people share. In cities, and where there are caste systems, people horde.

    The official myth of Saint Gandhi

    The International Day of Non-Violence is marked on 2 October, the birthday of Mahatma Gandhi, leader of the Indian independence movement and pioneer of the philosophy and strategy of non-violenceUN.org

    It was from within a violent environment, which oppressed him both in South Africa and in India, that the Mahatma, born Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, gave birth to his philosophy of nonviolence.

    -http://groundreportindia.org/monthly/cover-reports/2016/10/october-2-nonviolence-day-gandhis-birthday/

    Above is the official myth, touted by the Roth-efeller (Glossary) United Nations and repeated ad nauseam everywhere. If one reads the excellent book Eclipse of the Hindu Nation: Gandhi and His Freedom Struggle by Radha Rajan (abbreviated to word Eclipse for remainder of this introduction), we discover that the above myth is false. It was Aurobindo and Savarkar who articulated the non-violent strategy, which Gandhi adapted to his own Christian understanding.

    "… there is not a single idea of issue that Gandhi raises and discusses in Hind Swaraj which as not been dealt with by Aurobindo with a greater brilliance and originality in his masterly treatise on passive resistance in Bande Mataram in April 1906." page 46 Eclipse

    It is almost impossible to imagine that someone who we have worshiped as great or significant, was actually placed by our present corrupt system to uphold the corrupt system.

    We have been told all our lives that Gandhi was not corrupt because he was against the British. Many people put Gandhi way up on a pedestal. No one is supposed to question Gandhi. Yes, we need to question all of our mind programming, and for Indian readers who have been programmed to worship Gandhi, this might seem difficult to read. I knew Gandhi very personally, so I write with some authority about this incarnation. After that death, Gandhi incarnated again in California and I am next on that thread of incarnations. I know of three other past incarnations of this thread. Yes, you read that correctly, and you might ask, Are you like Gandhi? No, I am not. Are you? No? In fact none of us are like anyone else, and none of us are like we were in the past. Every grain of sand is unique. This means that you will become something unknown and new, and not like what you are today. Each life is a new dawn.

    "The Congress Party, the dominant political institution in the half-century after independence, treats him as its icon. As a result, any criticism of Gandhi and his politics is likely to bring down the wrath of interested parties who hold up his ‘saintliness’ as a counter-argument. His martyrdom is invariably brought up in silencing arguments against his policies and actions.

    "This creates a peculiar problem for anyone trying to study the history associated with Gandhi and his times. Gandhi the Saint intrudes on the scene whenever one tries to unravel the complexities of Gandhi the Politician. And yet it was Gandhi the Politician and not Gandhi the Saint who dominated the national scene in the decades leading to [fake] independence. It was Gandhi the Politician, and not the Saint who turned Swaraj into a movement in support of the theocratic aims of the Khilafat; it was Gandhi the Politician and not the Saint who expelled [freedom fighter] Subhash Bose after his election as Congress president; it was Gandhi the Politician and not the Saint who imposed Pandit Nehru over Sardar Patel as prime minister of India against the wishes of the party; it was also Gandhi the Politician and not the Saint who imposed his will on the newly formed Congress Government to release funds for Pakistan which was then at war with India.

    All these were political actions that must be evaluated on their own merits, but his ‘saintliness’ invariably acts as a diversion whenever one brings up these and other controversial aspects of his political career.

    - https://orientviews.wordpress.com/gandhi-exposed

    As we saw with above Oct 2, 2016 UN quote, Gandhi the saint is still thrust upon a naïve world with the intent of pacifying us all, so we will not resist the UN. The UN was created by the same people who controlled the British Empire as we will see in Chapter 2. Just as Gandhi never strove for complete independence, but instead campaigned for dominion status within the Rothschild British system, today the Rothschild UN wants every citizen to be non-violent and surrender to dominion status under the Rothschild globalist World Order system. They don’t want people like Subhash Bose standing up with manliness for real independence. They want you to gently obey.

    The UN uses the fake legacy of Gandhi the saint, (who successfully stopped the true independence movement) to convince us to bend to their globalist one world aspiration. We are constantly told that if really want change we should stay in the system! As irrational as that idea might be, this was Gandhi.

    Gandhi was many things. He was great is some ways. He was sincere sometimes. He was self-effacing sometimes. He was heroic sometimes. In Yogananda’s book, Autobiography of a Yogi, we learn that Gandhi had surgery without anesthetics. This is quite remarkable. In the same years, U.S. President Garfield also had surgery without anesthetics. This is also quite remarkable. Gandhi fasted onto death, and he meant it. He wanted something, but as we are discovering, he was confused about what he wanted and was a formed puppet. He wanted to touch village life. But he was raised an aristocrat and trained as a barrister. Toward the end of his life he yearned for the natural life that the native Africans had, the simple life of self employment close to the land. Gandhi did in fact have noble desires, but he also had crazy ideas.

    Gandhi—To Every Briton, July 2 1940

    I want you to fight Nazism without arms or: with non violent arms. I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions: If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow Yourself, man woman and child, to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them. pp 199 Eclipse

    Where as Aurobido and Tilak invoked the kshatriya in society by calling upon the people to realize their strength, Gandhi consistently pointed to the weakness and helplessness of ‘dumb millions’ and diminished the kshatriya. pp 152 Eclipse

    Tilak and Aurobindo tried to … put the fire of rebellion back into Indian blood, to kindle a flaming determination to throw off the morass of tamas and fight back, and if need be, even to use force to end colonial rule.

    Naturally, colonial newspapers of the day [Rothschild newspapers], professing the ‘religion of love’ [New Age acquiescence] accused them of fanning hatred; but Aurobindo placed even hatred of colonial rule and colonialists in traditional Hindu perspective -

    Aurobindo—"If hatred is demoralizing, is is also stimulating. The web of life has been made a mingled strain of good and evil and God works his ends through evil was well as good. Let us discharge our minds of hate, but let us not deprecate a great and necessary movement because, in the inevitable course of human nature, it has engendered feelings of hostility and hatred. If hatred came, it was necessary that it should come as a stimulus, as a means of awakening.

    When tamas, inertia, torpor have benumbed a nation, the strongest forms of rajas are necessary to break the spell. There is no form of rajas so strong as hatred. Through rajas we rise to sattva …" pp 155 Eclipse

    "Aurobindo unerringly concluded that objections to Tilak becoming president of the INC originated from Gokhale, Surendranath Banerjea, and Pherozeshah Mehta, because Tilak was perceived as being Hindu and as advocating Hindu nationalism.

    Aurobindo—"The Indian Mirror, which is now the chief ally of the government among the Congress organs in Bengal, has chosen naturally enough to fall foul of Mr. Tilak. Mr. Tilak, we learn, has seriously offended our contemporary, by giving honour to Mr. Bhopatkar on his release from jail: his speeches on the Shivaji festival were displeasing to the thoughtful and enlightened men who congregate in the office of the Indian Mirror, and to sum the whole matter, he is a man of extreme views and without ‘tact’. Ergo, he is no fit man for the presidential chair of the Congress." [This sounds like CNN and BBC coverage of Donald Trump or any one else they want to smear. Aurobindo clearly paints how the inner club ostracizes anti-establishment movements.] pp 155-156 Eclipse

    Aurobindo accurately diagnosed the condition of ‘educated’ as being steeped in tamas – a state of languor which did not perceive its enslavement and therefore felt no desire to end it. pp 158 Eclipse

    Aurobindo juxtaposed passive resistance or organized resistance, as he called it, and the use of force or armed resistance; passive resistance is effective only if the rulers belong to the same civilizational ethos while armed resistance may become necessary if the offender refuses to return to dharma or if the end objective is to overthrow the foreign race. pp 160 Eclipse

    The mental and physical paralysis which gripped a small section of educated Indians now spread in the form of Gandhian pacifism and afflicted even ordinary Indians who were otherwise ready to do anything and follow any leader to expel the British Empire … pp 162 Eclipse

    "The INC under Gandhi’s leadership redefined swaraj and ceased to aim for the end of colonial rule. Dominion Status, Home Rule, and greater participation in governance remained its limited political goals, with the understanding that the INC should demand home rule only by passive resistance and not by taking up arms against the British. Implicit in this redefinition of the methods and objectives of the INC was that India would remain part and parcel of the British Empire. Thus the freedom movement led by Tilak, Aurobindo, Savarkar, and Lajpat Rai between 1890 and 1910, with complete political independence as its goal, was transformed into a freedom-movement-that-wasn’t from 1915 onwards, when Gandhi returned to India." pp 165 Eclipse

    It should be obvious that the vairajya imposed on the nation by Islamic and later European colonialism could never have been terminated by Gandhian Satyagraha. Kautilya’s scintillating intellect in the theory of polity and statecraft remains as relevant today as two Millenia ago. pp 172 Eclipse

    [Kautilya, also called Chanakya or Vishnugupta (300 bce), was a Hindu statesman and philosopher who wrote a classic treatise on polity, Artha-shastra, The Science of Material Gain.]

    Gandhi equated the sampradayas and panthas within sanatana dharma with the alien monotheistic Abrahamic religions and hence declared that they converged to the same goal. pp 174 Eclipse

    Gandhi chose to ignore the truth that the Hindu nation would not assimilate alien elements that refused to be assimilated because their religions were essentially politically and culturally separatist by nature and intent, and had the sole objective of Islamizing and Christianising all nations. He failed to understand from history that Islam and Christianity have always laid claim to the territory of nations which they invaded or occupied, without subscribing to the nationhood of those lands. pp 175 Eclipse

    The willful misinformation poisoned even the meagre trickle of native intellect and scholarship that survived the onslaught of English education; today the farcical Hindu-Muslim peaceful relationship is the torrential poisoned river of Marx-leaning academe. [Marx was a Rothschild employee.] pp 177 Eclipse

    Aurobindo—Passive resistance cannot build up a strong and great nation unless it is masculine, bold, and ardent in its spirit and ready at any moment and at the slightest notice to supplement itself with active resistance. pp 189 Eclipse

    Even the greatest rishis of old could not, when the Rakshasas were fierce and determined, keep up the sacrifice without calling in the bow [and arrows] of the Kshatriya ready for use … pp 191 Eclipse

    Gandhi’s perception of the Muslim community is best defined in Aurobindo’s words as ‘pureblind sentimentalism.’ The Khilafat Committee provided those that nursed ambitions of re-establishing Muslim rule in India, with an avenue for not only opposing colonial rule, but also with an outlet for a long-suspended jihad against Hindus. The civil disobedience movement that Gandhi most fortuitously launched in support of Khilafat, encouraged Kerala Muslims to hoist the Khilafat flag across the Malabar, and the frenzy of Islamist revivalism inevitably culminated in the massacre of Hindu men, women and children, accompanied by rape, molestation and brutal mutilation of the dead. pp 247 Eclipse

    [The extremist Muslim Brotherhood was created by British Intelligence – the Rothschilds, at same period of time in Egypt. This is an easy search on internet. It would be very unlikely that the Rothschilds were not also funding divisive elements in India, as that has been their program everywhere else is world to this day. They funded Karl Marx 60 years before! Meanwhile, it is undeniable that the Koran contains remedies for disobedience that are violent and sanctifies this abuse as holy. Islam is not a religion of peace, accept peace established by the sword. For this reason, globalist peace embraces Islam, as war is the path to one world government peace by the Rothschilds. Again, they created the Muslim Brotherhood.]

    Bhagat Singh was in a group that bombed Delhi’s Central Legislative Assembly (Lok Sabha).

    Bhagat Singh- "… We have only hoisted the ‘danger-signal’ to warn those who are speeding along without heeding the grave dangers ahead. We have only marked the end of an era of utopian non-violence, of whose futility the rising generation has been convinced beyond a shadow of doubt." pp 262 Eclipse

    Gandhi needed to conjure up a measure as dramatic as Bhagat Singh bombing the Central Legislative Assembly. He came up with his famous march to Dandi, walking 241 miles in 24 days, which historians project as an act that ‘shook the empire’, though there was no evidence of any tremor within the empire. If anything, the empire struck back. As seen earlier in the paper, the salt tax which Gandhi was supposed to have challenged by the Dandi March, was abolished only by Nehru’s interim government in 1946. [His march accomplished nothing and was a failure.] pp 267 Eclipse

    Subhash Bose in World War II

    "Subhash Bose rightly perceived that Nazi Germany posed no threat to India and Indians, and that colonial Europe, especially Britain, was the real threat to India. Bose’s seeking to overthrow the British, with the help [arms] of Germany and Japan was pragmatic Kautilyan foreign policy, namely, there are no permanent friends, no permanent enemies, only enduring national interests. Bose presented a striking contrast to Gandhi …

    Nazi Germany was intrinsically evil [according to author Radha Rajan, who did not know that the Hitler puppet was grandson of Soloman Rothschild and that Nazi Germany was a chess piece in an evil game of world domination and never an independent initiative] and was an enemy of the West comprising America and Europe. But Nazi evil was no worse than colonial Europe [organized from 1815 by the Rothschild banksters] which has plundered the resources of Africa, Asia, the Americas, Caribbean, and Australia; which has carried out genocide of native populaces of these continents and forcibly invaded and occupied their territory, with the Church walking hand-in-hand with the invading forces. Colonial Europe was Nazi Germany magnified many times over. pp 289 Eclipse

    Gandhi was not against the ambitions of the Globalists who wanted India in League of Nations, and then United Nations, which were both created by the same Rothschild family that controlled India through the East India Company. In South Africa, the head of the British government was a man named Jan Cristian Smuts.

    Jan Christian Smuts, leading guerrilla leader of the Boer War (1899-1902), held several cabinet posts [in South Africa], including Defense Minister, under President Botha. In 1917, he joined the Imperial War Cabinet in London. He played a leading role in both World Wars, and was the only man to sign the peace treaties at the end of both wars. Smuts played an important role in drafting the Constitution of the League of Nations and later the United Nations Covenant. [He was a central operator for the Rothschilds, who planned both World Wars, and created both the League of Nations and United Nation.] His friends included the apparently irreconcilable duo – Winston Churchill and Mohandas Gandhi. pp 42 Eclipse

    As Smuts himself stated in the Senate on March 11, 1914, Gandhi was allowed to function in South Africa as he did ‘because he never advocated methods of violence to overthrow the government.’ pp 127 Eclipse

    Gandhi was given a hero’s send-off from South Africa with General Smut’s appellation ‘the saint’ adorning his head. The popular myth doing the rounds in India, was that Gandhi’s Satyagraha had wrung the heart of the South African government which saw the evil of its ways and agreed to end discrimination against Indians. We know that this was not quite true and that nothing had changed for the Indians and nothing would change for them, not even in 1948 when Gandhi passed away. Yet, Gandhi arrives to a hero’s welcome and neatly steps into the vacuum in the INC created by Tilak’s failing health and Aurobindo’s retreat. pp 207 Eclipse

    Once one begins to understand the chess game, Gandhi’s close association with a central conspiracy agent like Smuts, puts Smuts in position of being another of pliable Gandhi’s handlers.

    * * *

    Gandhi was not clear about Western influence. He was very confused about the intentions of monotheistic religions such as Islam. He thought there was something good to be gained by India from Britain, but what exactly was that goodness? As we know now, the ethic of take the money and run is not a good ethic.

    Gandhi was against a return to the Hindustan that proceeded the conquest by the East India Company. He had been anglicized at university

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1