ARTICLE VI LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT SECTION 28 POWER OF TAXATION, LIMITATIONS, EXEMPTIONS COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE vs LINGAYEN GULF ELECTRIC POWER

ER CO. INC. 164 SCRA 27 August 4, 1988 FACTS: This is an appeal from the decision of the Court of Tax Appeals (C.T.A., for brevity) dated September 15, 1964 in C.T.A. Cases Nos. 581 and 1302, which were jointly heard upon agreement of the parties, absolving the respondent taxpayer from liability for the deficiency percentage, franchise, and fixed taxes and surcharge assigned against it in the sums of P19,293.41 and P3,616.86 for the years 1946 to 1954 and 1959 to 1961, respectively. The respondent taxpayer, Lingayen Gulf Electric Power Co., Inc., operates an electric power plant serving the adjoining municipalities of Lingayen and Binmaley, both in the province of Pangasinan, pursuant to the municipal councils, under Resolutions Nos. 14 and 25 of June 29 and July 2, 1946, respectively. ISSUE/s: 1. Whether or not the Five percent (5%) franchise tax prescribed in Section 259 of the National Internal Revenue Code assessed against the private respondent on its gross receipts realized before the effectivity of R.A. No. 3843 is collectible. 2. Whether or not Section 4 of R.A. No. 3843 is unconstitutional for being violative of the "uniformity and equality of taxation" clause of the Constitution. 3. If the abovementioned Section 4 of R.A. No. 3843 is valid whether or not it could be given retroactive effect so as to render uncollectable the taxes in question which were assessed before its enactment. 4. Whether or not the respondent taxpayer is liable for the fixed and deficiency percentage taxes in the amount of P3,025.96 for the period from January 1, 1946 to February 29, 1948, the period before the approval of its municipal franchises. HELD: ` 1. By virtue of R.A. 3843, the private respondent was liable to pay only Two percent (2%) franchise tax, effective from the date the original municipal franchise was granted. 2. R.A. 3843 specifically provided for the retroactive effect of the law. 3. The appealed decision of the respondent Court of Tax Appeals is AFFIRMED. _

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila SECOND DIVISION G.R. No. L-31890 May 29, 1987 PEOPLE'S HOMESITE AND HOUSING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, FELICIDAD ALICE et al. Facts On February 23, 1970 In this petition for certiorari, the People's Homesite and Housing Corporation (PHHC) seeks a reversal of the Resolution of the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) ordering the PHHC to pay private respondents * wage differentials for work rendered from July 25, 1967 to February, 1968. Issues WHETHER OR NOT THE CIR HAS JURISDICTION OVER PHHC, A GOVERNMENT OWNED AND/OR CONTROLLED CORPORATION PERFORMING GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS II WHETHER OR NOT (THE) CIR HAS JURISDICTION OVER THOSE CASES WHERE THERE EXIST(S) NO EMPLOYER- EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP III WHETHER OR NOT (THE) CIR HAS JURISDICTION OVER CASES FOR MERE MONEY CLAIMS WHERE NO REINSTATEMENT IS SOUGHT Ruling of the court We ruled that the NHC (PHHC), as it was established as an "instrumentality of government to accomplish governmental policies and objectives and extend essential services to the people," performs governmental and not proprietary functions. It thus comes under the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission and not the Ministry of Labor and Employment. We see no reason for departing from that ruling now. The Court of Industrial Relations had no jurisdiction over the dispute involving the PHHC and the private respondents. In view of the foregoing, we deem it unnecessary to pass upon the other issues raised. WHEREFORE, the petition is granted. The assailed resolution of the Court of Industrial Relations is SET ASIDE.