These developments have certain advantages and drawbacks to both business and the staff concerned.
2. 3.
being an efficient way to keep costs down in areas where you don't yet need full-time cover. In fact, it is not uncommon for part-time workers to do as much in
their shorter day or week than a full-time worker on the same staff. In this article Duport looks at how employing part-timers can help your business, plus the benefits of job-sharing, as well as how to stay within the law and treat your part-timers as favorably as full-time workers.
being able to show potential clients and customers that you value having a diverse workforce and ethical employment practices.
expanding the pool of potential recruits - part-time work tends to attract parents with younger children and older people, who may not want to work full time but can bring a wealth of skills, experience and expertise.
increasing the ability of your business to respond to change and peaks of demands - for example, you can use more workers at peak times and extend your operating hours by using part-time workers in the evening or at weekends
helping to reduce the workloads of other workers, eg when you don't have enough work for a new full-time position but are regularly using overtime to meet demands - this can reduce your overtime costs and help prevent the negative effects of stress and fatigue. Benefits to you, the employer, can be
enormous. Flexibility to meet peaks in demand is increased and you have a wider range of skills, experience, views and ideas to call upon. If one person is off sick or on holiday there can be greater continuity.
y y
Motivation levels may be adversely affected because part-time staff may feel less involved and committed to the business than full-time worker. It will be much more difficult to establish a teamwork culture if all the staff never actually meet each other because of their different working hours.
Ideal contract
Contact could be ideal for certain types of workers , for example students , parents with young children ,or more elderly people who do not wish to work a full week. Everyone has the chance to get a part time job to used up their free time to earn some money.
Core and Peripheral Workers Atkinson proposed a model of the flexible firm. In the flexible firm model, flexibility is defined as functional, numerical and financial flexibility. It is developed by Atkinson during the 1980s, the core periphery model concept
Core workers are the more-or-less permanent workers of a company, usually possessing a high level of qualifications or firm-specific skills that cannot be easily replaced. Core workers are expected to display functional flexibility in return for security of employment. Functional flexibility is concerned with the ability of employees to handle different tasks and move between jobs, i.e. multi-skilling. This approach enables employers to match changing workloads, production methods and/or technology within the firm. Such workers from the core of the company's workforce, and comprises, usually are managers, designers, technical sales staff, quality control staff, technicians and craftsmen. Peripheral workers are those who are employed by a company on a fixedterm or occasional basis and are thus the first to be laid off when demand slackens. Peripheral workers are expected to provide the firm with numerical flexibility. Numerical flexibility refers to the power to adjust the number of workers or the number of hours worked, in response to changes in demand.
Financial flexibility refers to a firm's capability to change employment costs in response to supply and demand in the external labour market. This facilitates the objectives of functional and numerical flexibility. Furthermore, it involves a move away from standardized pay structures. It is directed towards more individualized systems dependent upon performance. Peripheral group one are employees have permanent contracts. However, they have few career opportunities and less job security. Peripheral groups two are employees of more numerically flexible. They are mainly parttimers, job sharers or employees on short-term contracts. These two peripheral groups are in their turn surrounded by external or distanced groups. They are not directly employed by the company and include sub contractors, self-employed workers, temporary staff agencies and outsourcing. According to Bryson and Blackwell (2006) a rise in numerical flexibility through temporary contracts is unsatisfactory due to inconsistencies and lack of stability for management. However, there are also criticisms of the model focus mainly on three aspects. First is the sloppiness in conceptual specification. The model's assumption of homogeneity within the core group and within the peripheral group is not an
accurate reflection of reality. It is also difficult to analyse the make-up of the core. Some writers have discussed a variety of work arrangements that comprise the periphery, but have tended to treat the core as a fairly homogenous group. Moreover, there is a counter argument to this. To view core and peripheral workers as occupying positions in separate parts of the organisation is to neglect considering ways in which these groups of workers may work together within the same departments. They may even perform the same jobs within an organization. Secondly is the lack of unequivocal empirical support for the model as description. The relationship between the core and periphery sector is more elaborate than is generally assumed by the core-periphery model. It may not always be the case, for example, that workers in the periphery are used to protect the core. In addition, these two groups of employees may be related in other ways, such as recruitment and selection of temporary agency staff for permanent positions. Thirdly, is the covert ideological agenda embodied in the model as description. It is questionable whether the flexible firm model shows both the core and periphery labour force as separate employment categories. Some writers have found that in the hospitality industry, part-time and temporary staffs are extensively used to provide essential core services. There is some evidence from the British retailing and hospitality industry that part-time, temporary and casual staff make up the core rather than the periphery. They are essential to the organization. Others have found that the use of temporary workers is more likely to occur where demand is predictable. Also, overtime is the preferred method to achieve temporary flexibility where demand is unpredictable. Thus temporary workers are not replacing standard workers. On the other hand, there is evidence that suggests that employers and many trade unionists regard part-time workers as marginal. Part-time and temporary employees are also treated as distinct labour force segments. Other studies show that temporary work appears to be a screening procedure to recruit permanent staff rather than a strategy to increase a periphery. Furthermore, there is evidence that the chief reason for using selfemployed workers is for specialist skills which are unavailable in the core work-force. It is not to provide numerical flexibility..