Letters Between Spanu Dumitru Viorel And Pankaj Mani

Re:
Hide Details
FROM:

Dumitru Viorel Spanu

TO:

Message fla gged

pankaj mani

Thursday, September 8, 2011 6:18 AM

Message body

Dear Sir , our different opinions lays in our different cultural heritage . I am a christian , my religion is orthodoxy , our Holly Book is the Bible . In the Bible the first three sentences are these ( I`ll put them also in Romanian ) : In the beginning it was the word . And the word was with God . And God was the word . ( La inceput a fost cuvintul . Si cuvintul era cu Dumnezeu . Si Dumnezeu era Cuvintul ) What these means ? The great physicists Stephen Hawking , in his book , " A brief history of time " said so : " It is not quite clear what was the role of the Creator " . But he didn`t said that there was no Creator . He let a little gate for the existence of God saying that he don`t quite well understand what was the role of the God . Did you see the point . Someone said " it is not clear what was the role of Creator " but this phrase shows that we humans can not understand what is the role of God , and only that . These show the limitation of our power of understanding , and I think that you agree with these . In a letter that I sent to Martin Bojowald ( a physicist that is one of the developers of Loop Quantum Gravity ) I said that God first wrote the equations that enables the existence of physical laws . One must first wrote the equations that enables a coherent set of physical laws which , on their turn , will enable a physical reality of an Universe .

A short talk about left - right symmetry of the nature . Werner Heisenberg said ( in Romanian : Simetria dreapta stinga ar fi atunci urmarea uneidublari ulterioare , care ar putea aparea matematic depilda din faptul ca o ecuatie are doua solutii la fel de indreptatite.)" that this symmetry right -left of nature

would be a consequence of the fact that , as an example , an equation has two solutions which are both wright "

But you see , those equations had existed " before " that symmetry right - left of nature began its existence .

And Alain Connes said in

Les dossiers de la recherch : Je suis prt parier qu on s`apercevra un jour que la realite materielle se situe en fait al`interieur de la realite mathematique .

I will be glad to hear your opinion , dear friend .

My best regards and success !

Sincerely , Spanu Dumitru Viorel

From: pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> To: Dumitru Viorel Spanu <spanuviorel@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 8:31 AM Subject: Re:

If you could tell in practical life, what makes you think so,Sir,any experimental proof that entire thinking is justified.or any mathematical result that exists beyond and completely explicit of physics,Sir?

On 9/7/11, pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> wrote:

> What's the critical point? I am curious to see your demonstration,Sir . > > On 9/7/11, Dumitru Viorel Spanu <spanuviorel@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Dear friend , as you sent me the url >> http://vixra.org/pdf/1105.0002v1.pdf of your demonstration of the >> Riemann Hypothesis , I understand that I can download your >> demonstration , with your permission . So , I look at your >> demonstration . What to say ? You are a genius . I fully >> agreed that our common algebra it is linked with the physical >> phenomenons . As , in your opinion , our common algebra is a >> consequence of the physics reality . Anyway , my opinion is >> that >> the mathematics archaic reality is the matrix of the touchable >> reality . >> If you would like , I may send you my observations regarding >> the >> demonstration of Riemann Hypothesis . I think that there is a >> critical point in the demonstration . You may consider it or >> not >> , as you like . I wish all the success to you . My best >> regards ! >> >> Author : Spanu Dumitru Viorel >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: pankaj mani <manipankaj9@gmail.com> >> To: spanuviorel@yahoo.com >> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 11:54 AM >> Subject: >> >> >> finding the decimal number part in the rough draft on vixra.org >> http://vixra.org/pdf/1105.0002v1.pdf >> It's a duality between mathematics & physics. >

Dear friend Pankaj Mani , this is my observation on your demonstration of the Riemann Hypothesis . The multiplication operator * is an operator of multiplication from another algebra . Of course that you know that there are many algebras ( already published on scribd.com ) The functions 2s , 1-s , f( 1-s ) , g( s ) , sin ( ( s )/2 ) are being calculated using the multiplication operator ( scalar ) x from our common algebra .

As a condition that the demonstration to be coherent and self consistent , the functions 2s , 1-s , f( 1-s ) , g( s ) , sin ( ( s )/2 ) must be calculated using the multiplication operator * from that different algebra ( 0*0 0 si 0*0*0 *0 0). The critical point of the demonstration is this : you used two different multiplication operator in the same equation : f( s ) = 2s * 1-s * f( 1-s ) * g( s ) * sin ( ( s )/2 )

It can be constructed a composed function f ( s ) , using two different multiplication operators , from two different algebras ( I think that it is needed to be written a new theorem for composing functions ) This would be the case discussed for the functional equation : f( s ) = 2s * 1-s * f( 1-s ) * g( s ) * sin ( ( s )/2 ) as you defined it . The observation in this case is that , this function f(s) is different from the Riemann zeta function ,

as it appears in Riemann Hypothesis . You may take this observation in consideration or not , as you wish . Anyway , I wish all the success to you in your work . It is quite clear that you are a genius . With friendship and great consideration Spanu Dumitru Viorel