0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
47 tayangan2 halaman
Power in a negotiation is defined as "the capabilities negotiators can assemble to give them selves an advantage or increase the probability of achieving their objectives" There are 5 main sources of power: informational sources of power, personal sources, power based on position in an organization, relationship-based sources of power. Power is based also on the situation, context and environment, and these can be BATNAs, culture, and agents, constituencies and external audiences.
Power in a negotiation is defined as "the capabilities negotiators can assemble to give them selves an advantage or increase the probability of achieving their objectives" There are 5 main sources of power: informational sources of power, personal sources, power based on position in an organization, relationship-based sources of power. Power is based also on the situation, context and environment, and these can be BATNAs, culture, and agents, constituencies and external audiences.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai DOC, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
Power in a negotiation is defined as "the capabilities negotiators can assemble to give them selves an advantage or increase the probability of achieving their objectives" There are 5 main sources of power: informational sources of power, personal sources, power based on position in an organization, relationship-based sources of power. Power is based also on the situation, context and environment, and these can be BATNAs, culture, and agents, constituencies and external audiences.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai DOC, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
Power in a negotiation is defined as “the capabilities negotiators
can assemble to give them selves an advantage or increase the probability of achieving their objectives”. It is believed that power gives advantage in a negotiation, so by this when a negotiator needs power o thinks he has less power; they seek for more to counterbalance this. There are two perspectives on power “power over” that is used to control the other and “power with” used to work with the other. Power has a variety of types: 1) expert power, coming from the information known; 2) reward power) that comes from the ability to reward others; 3)Coercive Power, coming form the ability to punish others; 4)legitimate power, coming form hierarchy and 5) Referent power, coming form the respect and admiration towards a person. There are 5 main sources of power: informational sources of power, personal sources of power, power based on position in an organization, relationship-based sources of power and contextual sources of power. Informational power is how the negotiator is able to organize facts that support their position or goal. The power based on personality and Individual differences is weather the negotiator uses personal orientation, it means the different psychological orientations they can use: cognitive, motivational dispositional and moral. The power based on position in an organization is weather it is legitimate, witch is the level in the organization and power based on the control of resources associated with the position. The power based on relationships witch divides in tree types of power: goal interdependence that is how the parties view their own goals, referent power that comes from the admiration and respect, and networks that derives from the location in the structure of an organization. Power is based also on the situation, context and environment, this is the contextual sources of power, and these can be BATNAs, culture, and agents, constituencies and external audiences. BATNAs that is the alternative that the party will use if he or she does not reach an agreement, the culture determines the “meaning system” of a social environment and the agents, constituencies and external audiences make negotiations more complex as it represents other points of view. There are times when a negotiator have to deal with others who have more power, some advice of Michael Watkins is to never do an all- or- nothing deal, make the other party smaller, make yourself bigger, build momentum trough doing deals in sequence, use the power of competition to leverage power, constrain yourself, seek out for information that strengthens your negotiation position and case and do what you can to manage the process. Negotiators have to be prepared because most of the times power will not be evenly distributed, weather a negotiator is in the side that has more or less power, he or she must not get to the thoughts of superiority or inferiority; it is very important to always remember that it is still a situation that benefits both, and with a bad or no agreement nobody wins. It is also very important to “do your homework” before a negotiator, a great deal of power can come from having information about yourself and the other party.