Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD " PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313, Israel; jz12345@earthlink.net ; 91313 " 04413,

11-09-20 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel Request for Clarification re Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment (Eng + Heb) Attached:
# 1 Record Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel Request for Clarification re Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment as filed (Hebrew) Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) Sept 20, 2011 Request for Clarification (English) Page # 2

12

Brief Chronology: 1) The Appeal originated in the case of Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11), and pertained to denial of request for clarification by the Clerk of the Court relative to validity of certain records in the case. 2) The September 7, 2011 Judgment in the Appeal was served on the Appellant (Dr Zernik) unsigned. (Exhibit 2) 3) In contrast, another the September 5, 2011 Decision in the case of Katzav v State of Israel was served on the same week on Dr Zernik signed, stamped with the seal of the court, and also stamped Approved for service with hand signature from the Office of the Clerk. (Exhibit 1) 4) In other cases, decisions of the Court, which appeared (unsigned and unstamped) in the online public access system, were not served at all on Dr Zernik. 5) Therefore, request was filed on September 20, 2011, for clarification regarding the validity of September 7, 2011 Judgment. 6) No ruling was received on the September 20, 2011 Request. 7) Request, later filed, for a certified copy of the September 7, 2011 Judgment, was also never ruled upon, and no signed and certified copy of the September 7, 2011 Judgment was ever received. In conclusion: A reasonable person is likely to conclude that the September 7, 2011 Judgment was and is a simulated decision, or at best a vague and ambiguous court record.

2/5

1: "" -5 , 1102, )11/2733(, - . 2: " " -7 , 1102, )11/1406(, - . : 02 , 1102,

_____________________ " " 04413, 31319 : 4103.805.250

jz12345@earthlink.net
_____________

 11/1406 "

, " , :

' ' -7 , 1102, , ,

, , : : " , " 01, - :5499.639.750 : 5779.686.30 - 92, 01019 : 4666.646.20 :

: - " : 2369.576.20 : 8469.576.20 : -02 , 1102, ____________________ " " 04413, 31319 : 4103.805.250

jz12345@earthlink.net

[digital signature - jz]

In the Supreme Court in Jerusalem 6041/11 Dr Joseph Zernik V State of Israel Request for Clarification by the Honorable Justice S Jubran, Regarding Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment in Instant Case, and for Due Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request To the Honorable Court and the Parties in the case: The Appellant herein files a Request for Clarification by the Honorable Justice S Jubran, Regarding Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment in Instant Case, and for Due Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request. I. Request for Clarification by the Honorable Justice S Jubran, Regarding Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment in Instant Case Purpose and Justification of the Request:

1.

In recent days, two records of the Supreme Court have appeared in two cases: a) The September 5, 2011 Decision under Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11). The record was received by mail signed and stamped Exhibit 1. b) The September 7, 2011 Judgment under Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11). The record was received by mail unsigned and stamped Exhibit 2. In other cases, decisions of the Supreme Court have not been received at all, but appeared in the online public access system, unsigned and unstamped. The Appellant claims that any reasonable person would conclude, after review of the records and other facts in this matter, that it is unreasonable that these two records hold the same validity. Therefore, the undersigned asks that the Honorable Justice S Jubran clarify, whether the September 7, 2011 Judgment is a valid judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, pursuant to the law of the State of Israel. II. Request for Due Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request

2. Purpose and Justification of the Request: The Appellant has previously received an unsigned and uncertified copy of the Judgment in instant case. Likewise, the Judgment was published online unsigned and uncertified. Therefore, the Appellant asks that the Supreme Court duly serve on him a signed and certified copy of the decision on instant Request at the address below. III. Exhibits
The Supreme Court UNREPRESENTED PARTIES DIVISION September 20, 2011 RECEIVED/INSPECTED Signature: ___[signature jz]_

Exhibit 1 - The September 5, 2011 Decision under Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11), as received by mail, signed and stamped. Exhibit 2 - The September 7, 2011 Judgment under Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11), as received by mail, unsigned and stamped Dated: September 20, 2011
[signature jz]

_________________ Dr Joseph Zernik PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313 Tel: 052-5083014 jz12345@earthlink.net