Challenge: -We have raised the standards in terms of setting the bar but by themselves, some NGOs have difficulty reaching the standards Response: -handholding -peer review and assistance
PREVENT INAPPROPRIATE
-Attempts by government to regulate - Executive Order 671 (superseded by Executive Order 720) - 3 house bills in Congress
GOVERNMENT REGULATION?
-But these were successfully prevented (for the meantime) thru: - support of different sectors - advocacy
Challenge:
-Some politicians eye NGOs/ foundations either as suspect (of dubious motives) or prospect for their own interests -More bills in Congress are to be expected Response: -vigilance & advocacy
Challenge:
-complicated
universe -number of NGOs involved in scams & scandals (mostly founded by politicians or their relatives -indifference of some donors/funding agencies towards NGO accountability /due diligence -Response: -vigilance & advocacy
ALTERNATIVES TO SELFREGULATION
government regulation? -politicians have used NGOs for their own self-interest -corruption in government-related institutions has been rife independent monitoring bodies? -expensive -may not have the appropriate context
peer review? -an NGO review may need specialists, e.g. PCNC has volunteer evaluators from PICPA to look into financial management systems -re standards, peer-to-peer may become questionable if the one reviewing may not have the best practice -may be difficult to prevent in-breeding or in-fighting (competition or turfing)
CONCLUSION (From PCNCs Perspective) Despite the challenges, self-regulation is the way to go (in a democratic society where peoples' participation, freedom, and responsibility are respected and promoted).
Thank you.