PARTICIPATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Process Control Management System

Process
STAGEONE Constitutionofthe EvaluationTeam underCoP (DonorAgency)

Participants
DonorAgency FieldAgency's Executives(CEO)/ ProgrammeOfficers

Agenda/Content
ProgrammeFramingfor Assessment Stakeholder (Respondent)Identification.

Objective
FormulationoftheFrameworkfor Evaluation. Identificationofthekeyquestions. Approvingtheevaluationtoolsforthe project.

Expected Outcome
Approval of a concrete Project Assesment Frame. Tageted area of Assessment. Recomendation of the Assesment Tools.

STAGETWO

LevelOne MeetingofCEOof theFieldAgencyand differentProject Officers Fieldmeeting

FieldAgency's Executives/Programme Officer

ReviewoftheFieldProgress ReportsofthedifferentAreas ofIntervention. i.eHealth,IGAs,Agricultureetc. FormulationofAssessment Timeline(Framing)

Toassesstheexistingandthemidterm reportsandprepareareportwhich reportedfromthefield.

Build the birdview knowledge about the work done in the project area.

FieldAgency Executives/Project Officers,Field workers,andthevillage committees

Decidetheconvinienttimewhich sopportthelargestparticipationofthe peopleindemocraticway. Toensurethateveryoneisclearabout thetimeperiodbeingassessed(temporal boundary)

Universal acceptance of the Timeframe in the community. Collective consensus building. Ensured Participantion of the beneficiaries. Focusedanddefinedareaselection.

FieldStaffmeeting

FieldAgency Executives/Project Officers andFieldWorkers VillageCommitte membersandImpact AssessmentTeam.

Definingthespatialor geographicalboundaries

Toensurethateveryoneunderstandsthe limitsoftheareainwhichimpactistake place.

LevelTwo Village MeetingI (Beneficiaries member)

Decidewhichmethodsto use,andtestthem.

Ensuretherighttoolsforthedifferent areaofInterventions. Approprietetoolsselection.

Realchangeinthecommunity livelihoodstatuscanbemeasured. EnsuredhighdegreeImpact assessment.

VillageMeetingII (Beneficiaries/ member)

VillageCommitte membersandImpact AssessmentTeam.

Decidewhichsamplingmethod Tomeasureimpactindifferentlocation oftheprojectArea. andsamplesizetouse.

EnsuredEquitabledistributionofthe inputintheprojectarea.

Tocaptureoveralltrend. VillageMeetingIII (Beneficiaries/ member) VillageCommitte membersandImpact AssessmentTeam. Identifyandprioritizelocally definedimpactindicators. Decidewhichmethodsto use,andtestthem. Tomeasuretheprogress/results/growth usingQuantativeandQualitative Methods. Sensitization for effective monitoring process of the community. Skill building and Empowerment.

LEVELTHREE

VillageMeetingIV

VillageCommitteand Communitymembers

Assessprojectandnonproject factors.

Assessmentofattribution. Tounderstandalltheprojectandnon projectfactorswhichcontributedto changesintheimpactindicators identified. Tounderstandtherelativeimportance.

Strengthing the approaches towards non-project factors to achieve highest benefits

LEVELTHREE

AssessmentAnalysis

Community members,Village Committemembersand ImpactAssessment Team.

Trangulation.

Tocrosschecktheresultsfromthe participatoryexercises. Tousedifferentparticipatorymethodsto measurethesameindicator,andthen comparetheresults.

Knowledge Exchange in between the Stakeholders

STAGETHREE

AssessmentAnalysis VillageCommitte Meeting

Community members,Village Committemembersand ImpactAssessment Team.

Feedbackandverifytheresults withthecommunity.

Topresentationofthefindingsbackto thecommunity.

Expantion of Learning Environment in the community. Confidence Building of the community. Development of Indigeneous

STAGEFOUR

AssessmentAnalysis

DonorAgency,Field Agency

Reporting,Documentation

Secondarydataforfuture Research,inventionofIntervention methodology.

Supportive force for Advocacy and Goodwill building.