2006
Dear Editor in Chief,
A scholar asked: “I saw an elephant in the TV that could recognize himself in a
mirror. It seems that an elephant has some kind of intelligence different from so many
animals. Other scientists believe that elephants, dolphins, monkeys have intelligence
more advance than other animals. Could these characteristics of elephants and also
dolphins, monkeys be some key factors to clarify things about evolution of specie versus
creation?” The A.I. answered: “With regards to evolution versus creation, I think
evolution is an attempt to show scientific ways how things were created. But with regards
to creation, it shows that there is an ultimate caused of the caused called creator.
Elephants, dolphins, monkeys should be well studied especially on their ability to learn. I
think dogs are also like dolphins that could easily be trained.
A scholar asked: “Could the economic partnership of China and Africa be another
show case of China as being a new global economic power?” The A.I. answered: “China,
because of its culture or mind set of most of its citizens to be economic risk takers or
entrepreneurs-especially giving so much emphasis on their universal words like: a) one
should be better next time especially on selling things b) feng-sui: that all the
surroundings has “chi” or spirit that could influenced a person good luck or bad luck and
one should really seek for the good luck c) they have mind sets focus on unity, sacrifice,
family ties & family supports …- would be or is now a great and moderate and balanced
country.
A scholar asked: “I saw air-missiles are also being fired as counter measures by
moderate military men, and other missiles landed on some civilian places believed to be
where homemade rockets are being fired by invisible extremists; so killing some civilians
and also some extremists- it is extreme because civilians were also killed. What counter
measure would moderate military men do about rockets being fired at places where
civilians are staying? And what other counter measure should moderates also do so that
when extremists use civilians as human shields to deliberately include the civilians as
casualties and to enhance their propaganda that some trigger happy moderates are
murderers especially when the angry moderates discriminately fire also their
retaliations?” The A.I. answered: “Perhaps during war, collateral damage/s could be
allowed by international law or by rules on engagement or rules on waging guerilla war.
But in today’s standard, human right advocates also give focus on civilian casualties who
are believed to be discriminately being killed because of anger or revenge! Now, some
extremists are really doing some bait so that civilians could be victimized; and the
moderates would now be seen as extremists or terrorists! Perhaps pass: a) law that all
missiles being fired by moderate military men to counter the firing of extremist’s rockets
should be backed up with video recorder; or has a very small “black box” or “smart
eyes”. The video recorder would just be a compressed very cheap cell phone with video
capability to transmit the recorded video while in the air to a mother base. If there would
be an investigation, as it should always be by an independent body pushed by law
example UN war criminal investigators, and if there are civilian casualties because they
were used as human shields, the moderate military men have some concrete evidences to
show. b) If an officer knows by heart that the potential target building has civilians and
being used by those extremists to fire their offensive rockets, the moderate officer is
reminded by his military hand book to first fire a warning shot with video as supporting
evidence- just a little far from the target so that the civilians could have the chance to
leave the target. Or the moderates would fire a rocket that could burst with fliers
reminding the civilian to leave within example 5-2 minutes because they will fire deadly
rockets with video recorder on the target as counter measure or retaliation from the
extremist’s homemade rockets. c) Every moderate military squad is mandated to have a
soldier with rifle equipped with zoom telescope that could record video from the
telescope and could send those recorded video to a mother base automatically when an
assault is carried to suspected extremists who are using civilians as human shield or as
civilian casualties! d) There should be a small hovercraft that is remotely controlled as
the “witness” or “eyes” or “smart intelligence” because it is equipped with video
recorder; or every time there is a suspected extremist using civilians as human shields,
there could be evidence to support moderates’ claim that the extremists are using civilians
as human shields. e) Pass a law that if moderate soldiers happened to kill example
minimum of 3 civilians through using projectile bombs or non precision weapon or non
precision warheads, there should be stiffer penalty; perhaps the commander could be
demoted or even be imprisoned for example 2 years.
Law should let moderates be well known to his enemies as peace loving military
men; and moderates will do anything to save lives even if the misguided humans are
extremists by giving them chance to escape to show to those misguided humans
victimized by twisted word that the moderate’s enemies are not the misguided humans
but those twisted words ruling the minds of those extremists. The extremists will have all
the chance to change for the better before the last resort of wasting lives would be carried
out. Principle behind: Enhance the ‘warning first shot of police standard on rule on
engagement even on guerilla warfare using law and cheap very small smart technology.
Another principle: making weapons or ammos more smart, with “eyes as witness” and
little expensive could create some cycles of economic stimuli.
A scholar asked: “During war, split seconds are needed to save one very self. What if
those split seconds being used to give warnings or gathering recorded digital video as self
defense evidence/s would result to being the one to be killed just because of trying to be
moderate and humane; then the moderates would be on the defensive side or on the
weakling sides?” The A.I. answered: “The moderate military man should try: a) to be
well known as precise in his target; or non combatant should at all times be protected and
secured- “love of enemies” in action even in war is given more importance than hating or
having revenge b) to avoid being charged in court especially if there would be civilians
who are killed without recorded video as evidence; because discriminate firing could be
equal to deliberate doing the killing with hatred, and could now be a crime because of
international law. Or, wasting those misguided extremists and those civilians like
barbarians should be avoided. Better be known as cautious as being branded as barbaric.
The smart missiles or smart rocket could generate economic stimuli or cash to flow
because the bomb or ammo is equipped with “smart eye” as consumable too.
Giving more value to human even if the enemies are extremists should be a must.
Those extremists knows that if moderates are projected to the majority of the native
civilians as trigger happy or revengeful, or also barbaric or blood thirsty, the extremists
would gain more supports to the majority; so the war could be like another Vietnam war-
moderates are defeated by default through election in the motherland. Moderates should
invests more on body armor, target precision skills, trainings and on smart devices with
camera or video recorder; giving warning first- before using the last resort of wasting
humans pushed by law, science and technology and blessed by universal words- is more
valuable than discriminate firing; or doing revenge. Letting those ammunitions be more
little expensive as consumables to create another economic stimuli or needs could boost
the economy. Economic principle: If more consumables are created as cycle then more
jobs would be created for humans; and jobs have cycle or permanency.
If very expensive weapons like airplane equipped with laser could drive more those
invisible extremists to be more invisible, why invest on weapons that let the invisible be
more visible and let those extremists be charged in courts; after all the extremists are just
victims of those extremist’s preachers. More investments on letting invisible become
visible and the more civilians are being cared for- are concrete proofs or manifestations
that ‘caring for others even if they are enemies’ or ‘loving the enemies’ is on the go even
in wars. Discriminate firing is equal to hatred; and should be penalized especially if there
are civilians being victimized. Principle behind: “Loving enemies” should even be more
shown during war; and it could create more consumables, creativities and sensitivities.
A scholar asked: “You mentioned about sensitivities, I noticed that those homemade
rockets of the extremists are made of commercially available materials and chemicals in
the market; and the homemade rockets are being manufactured using tools example
welding machines, and cutting torches, etc. Why pass a law that all those materials, tools
that could contribute to the making of homemade rockets or bombs should be registered
and should have “smart eyes”?” The A.I. answered: “If only those machines and materials
that are being used to make homemade bombs could report to moderate authorities that
they will be used as the extremist’s ammo then it is good. But for now it is impossible.
Perhaps in the future, welding machines, cutting torch, metal sheets being sold could
have “smart eyes or “smart tracking devices” in its nano size or near invisible size and
disposable. At mother bases, there are programs as the “invisible police” to monitor those
materials and tools so that the tools and materials could not be used for any extremism by
humans victimized by those twisted words coming from uncorrected “sacred” books
being propagated by extremist preachers.
A scholar asked: “If moderates would now be more précised and with “smart eyes” in
their ammo; those projectile ammos should be banned such as those mortars, cannons,
etc. What can you say about it?” The A.I. answered: “Perhaps in the very near future,
moderate war weapons example riffles would have “smart block box” because if there
would be discriminate slaughter of civilians the ‘Black box could be the eyes.” Moderate
soldiers would be sensitive that their enemies are not those extremist humans but those
twisted words. They should always be reminded that ‘loving enemies’ even in wars is a
must.