ABSTRACT
[Fe49Pt51]88Ag12 nanoparticles were prepared by the simultaneous polyol reduction of platiunum acetylacetonate and silver acetate and the
thermal decomposition of iron pentacarbonyl, giving 3.5 nm diameter FePt particles with Ag atoms substituted in the lattice. The addition of
Ag promoted the fcc to tetragonal phase transition, thereby reducing the temperature required for this transition by some 100 to 150 °C
compared with pure FePt nanoparticles. After heat treatment at 400 °C for 30 min, the coercivity of the films containing [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12
nanoparticles was more than 3400 Oe, while the films containing FePt nanoparticles were superparamagnetic. This decrease in phase
transformation temperature allowed us to decrease the particle coalescence and loss in particle positional order seen when FePt nanoparticles
were transformed at temperatures above 550 °C.
One of the Chemistry Highlights of 20001 was the report by coated with organic surfactants (oleic acid and oleylamine)
S. Sun and workers at IBM of the synthesis, self-assembly, and can be dispersed in hydrocarbon solvents. When the
and magnetic recording performance of FePt nanoparticles.2 dispersions are cast onto solid substrates and the solvent
This report has generated considerable interest in the use of evaporates, the particles self-assemble into close-packed
self-assembled FePt nanoparticles for recording media in arrays. After heat treatment at temperatures above 500 °C,
future high-density data storage magnetic hard disk drives. the particles transform to the tetragonal phase, having high
Before this application can be realized some basic materials magnetocrystalline anisotropy3 and giving films with high
science problems must be solved. One of the most challeng- coercivity. The coercivity depends on the heating tempera-
ing problems is the phase transformation from the fcc phase ture, and for complete phase transformation, the particles
to the tetragonal (L10) phase. As prepared, the particles have must be heated to nearly 580 °C.4 However, when heated to
an fcc structure and are superparamagnetic. The particles are temperatures above 550 °C, there is considerable particle
coalescence and loss of particle positional order.5 Particle
* Corresponding author. E-mail: dnikles@mint.ua.edu coalescence leads to increased switching volumes, which
† Center for Materials for Information Technology.
‡ Department of Physics and Astronomy. defeats the point of making small particles. The loss of
§ Department of Chemistry. positional order comes from the decomposition of the
10.1021/nl025614b CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/06/2002
Figure 1. TEM images of self-assembled [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12 nanoparticles: as prepared, 1a, and after heat treatment at 400 °C for 30 min,
1b. These are negative images with the particles appearing as white spots.
surfactant layers allowing particle motion. It would be highly whereupon it turned brown. Then 0.50 mmol oleic acid, 0.50
desirable if the temperature required for the fcc to tetragonal mmol oleylamine, and 1.4 mL (1.1 mmol) iron pentacarbonyl
phase transformation were lower, at least below temperatures were added by syringe. The septum was replaced with a glass
where the particles coalesce, preferably below the temper- stopper and the reaction mixture heated to the reflux
ature where the organic surfactants decompose. temperature of phenyl ether (∼260 °C). After refluxing for
There have been many recent reports of the effect of 30 min, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room
additives on the thermal ordering of sputtered films of either temperature, giving a dark dispersion. Ethanol (25 mL) was
CoPt or FePt alloys. Kitakami et al. have found that the added to precipitate the particles, and the particles were
addition of Sn, Pb, Sb, Bi, or Ag into sputtered CoPt films isolated by centrifuging. The particles were redispersed in
promotes the disordered fcc to ordered tetragonal transforma- hexane, precipitated with ethanol, and isolated by centrifug-
tion, resulting in significant reductions in the temperature ing. The particles were dried at room temperature under
required for ordering.6,7 Quite recently, Maeda et al., from vacuum to give 100 to 200 mg. The dispersion and
Toshiba, observed a reduction of the ordering temperature precipitation purified the particles; however, we did not
for FePt sputtered films by adding Cu.8 For films containing characterize the content of the washings. For comparison,
[FePt]85Cu15, the coercivity was 5000 Oe after annealing at we also prepared Fe53Pt47 nanoparticles using the procedure
300 °C, while the Hc for films containing FePt was only a of S. Sun and co-workers.2
few hundred Oe after annealing at 300 °C. These reports The particles were dispersed in a 50/50 mixture of hexane
suggest a means of lowering the fcc to tetragonal phase and octane that included small amounts of oleic acid and
transformation for FePt nanoparticles by adding either copper oleylamine. The dispersion was dropped onto a carbon-coated
or silver. We set about preparing FePt nanoparticles contain- copper TEM grid (200 mesh from SPI) and the solvent
ing either Ag or Cu. It is not obvious that the effect of Ag evaporated to give a self-assembled film. The particle
or Cu will be the same in chemically synthesized nano- composition, [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12, was determined by energy-
particles as in sputtered films. In addition, unlike sputtered dispersive X-ray analysis on a Philips model XL 30 scanning
thin films using a Ag or Cu target, a suitable chemical electron microscope. The particles assembled into a hex-
procedure had to be found for introducing Ag or Cu into agonal closed-packed array as shown in Figure 1a, similar
FePt. Here we report the synthesis of [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12 to that seen for FePt and FexCoyPt100-x-y nanoparticles.9,10
nanoparticles and the beneficial effect of the added silver They had an average diameter of 3.5 nm and a chemically
on the phase transformation temperature. disordered fcc structure (Figure 2, curve a). The (111) lattice
Our initial attempts to add Ag to FePt used a modification spacing was expanded to 229 pm for the [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12
of the procedure we used to prepare FexCoyPt100-x-y nano- nanoparticle relative to 225 pm for Fe53Pt47, indicating that
particles.9 This involved the simultaneous polyol reduction silver was substituting into the FePt lattice. Heat treatments
of platinum acetylacetonate and silver acetylacetonate and were done in a Lindberg tube furnace with flowing argon
the thermal decomposition of iron carbonyl in octyl ether. (containing 2% hydrogen) for 30 min at temperatures ranging
Unfortunately, silver acetylacetonate was not adequately from 300 to 500 °C. The sequence of X-ray diffraction curves
soluble in octyl ether. Using silver acetate as the silver source in Figure 2 shows the progress of the fcc to L10 phase
and phenyl ether as the reaction solvent, we were able to transformation as a function of temperature. Careful exami-
prepare [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12 nanoparticles as follows. A 50 mL nation of curve c in Figure 2 shows that very weak (001)
three-necked round-bottom flask was equipped with magnetic and (011) peaks for the tetragonal FePt phase appeared after
stirring, a reflux condenser, a thermometer, a rubber septum, heat treatment at 350 °C. A shoulder appeared at the low
and an argon atmosphere. Teflon sleeves were used for all 2θ side of the FePt (111) peak indicating that Ag was phase
ground glass joints. To the flask was added 0.50 mmol separating from the particles. After heat treatment at 400
platinum acetylacetonate, 0.25 mmol silver acetate, and 20 °C, curve d in Figure 2, the (001), (011), and (200) diffraction
mL phenyl ether. The mixture was heated to 80 °C, peaks for the FePt L10 phase had clearly emerged, and the
1034 Nano Lett., Vol. 2, No. 10, 2002
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction data for the films containing self- Figure 4. Magnetic hysteresis curves for films containing self-
assembled [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12 nanoparticles: as-prepared (curve a) and assembled [Fe49Pt51]88Ag12 (solid curve) or Fe53Pt47 (dashed curve)
after heat treatment at 300 °C (curve b), 350 °C (curve c), 400 °C nanoparticles after heat treatment at 400 °C for 30 min.
(curve d), 450 °C (curve e), or 500 °C (curve f).