Kitt C. Reinhardt, Clay S. Mayberry, Brendan P.Lewis, Spacecraft Component Technology Branch
Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate (AFRUVSSV), Kirtland Air Force Base, NM
871 17-5776
15.2
Introduction 18.6 -
20.1 .
Today’s spacecraft have greater power 21.2
22.8 -
requirements than ever before. More electrical 24.4 .
energy is needed to run increasingly complicated
and diversified payloads that are assigned longer
.I .1
and more complex missions. To support these -0.075 - 4ls,=0.O61 to . I.
missions, the US Air Force Research Laboratory I
. .
(AFRL) has been involved in the research and 0.062 A !
-0.100
1.0
. ’
1.5
’ ’
2.01
’ ’
! 2.5
’ ’
3.0
’
3.5
development of high-efficiency 111-V
scmiconductor-based multijunction solar cells Voltage (V)
since 1990, including programs to develop the Fig. 1. Linear plot of dark and light I-V
first large-area 2-junction GaInPJGaAs, 3- characteristics of a GaInP2/GaAs/Ge solar cell. A
junction GaInP2/GaAs/Ge, and most recently, direct correlation is shown between decreasing
novel 4-junction solar cell designs. efficiency with increasing dark current.
Solar cell dark I-V behavior is known to
play an important role in limiting single junction
solar cell open-circuit voltage (V,& fill factor While detailed studies of dark I-V behavior for
GaInP: p-n diodes and solar cells have been
(ET),and conversion efficiency (q). This can be
reported [ 5 ] , detailed analysis of dark I-V behavior
seen from Equation 1,
of multijunction solar cells, and in particular,
monolithic GaInP2/GaAs/Ge solar cells, has not
been addressed in detail. In this study we
investigated the impact of individual (iso-) junction
where P,, I , and V,,, are the maximum power, dark current behavior on 3-junction solar cell
currcnt, and voltage, respectively, at the cell’s performance.
s (3)
1119
+v where
GalnP
-
Equation 9 explains the high observed values of A -
4 - 5 for the 3-junction solar cells, where typical
measured values of A for dark current at MPP for
individual junctions (discussed in next section) were
-
P
1.5 - 2. We also see from Equation 8 the
important role the values of reverse saturation
+V current, IGrlnP2, IGoAs, Ice for individual junctions
Ge play. It is noted that in good cells the values for
- reverse saturation currents are determined by the
dominant mechanism, diffusion or recombination,
where Idiff is generally many orders of magnitude
lower than I,, 151. The relative affect of reverse
Fig. 4. Equivalent electrical circuit model saturation current on total dark is shown in Figure 5,
assuming single dominant dark current where each value of I c a l n ~IcaAs,
, and Ice is varied
mechanism per junction. over 3 orders of magnitude, while the other two
values of reverse saturation current remain constant.
1120
from these cells revealed additional data where values
for ideality factor and reverse saturation current were
determined from fitting Equation 3 at the MPP of the
I-V curve. Values obtained for Ace= 1.4, JC,=lxlO-
6 '
Ncm-, A G ~ 1.4- ~ ~I .6,
~ JG%\~=
= 1x 1 0 " - l x 1O'I'Ncm',
ACalnP2= 1.9-2. I , and J c D l n ~ = 1x 1P A / c m ' .
Conclusions
Fig. 6. Three-dimensional sketch of an We have shown the impact of deleterious high dark
individual mesa of a GaInP/GaAs/Ge triple currents on 3-junction GaInP?/GaAs/Ge solar cell
junction solar cell. performance and identified the dominant dark current
mechanisms within individual GaInP?, GaAs, and Ge
solar cell p-n junctions as determined through voltage
dependencies. Dark current mechanisms due to carrier
diffusion and carrier recombination were identified
within the p-n junctions.
Acknowledgement
1121