WRITTEN REPLY
Respectfully Sheweth: -
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS: -
ON MERITS: -
1. That para No. 1 of this petition is correct upto this extent only
that the suit was filed by the petitioner with Qaswar Abbas
and Aftab Ahmad. This Hon’ble Court was pleased to
summon the defendants; and written statement was filed on
their behalf. On 26.9.02, this Hon’ble Court recorded the
statement of the counsel for defendants; and was pleased to
pass an order on the same day. This order is very much part &
parcel of that file. Remaining para is incorrect. The order
dated 26.9.02 is mis-quoted and mis-stated in this para, which
amounts to contempt of court as well.
2. That the contents of para No. 2 are correct upto the extent that
an application for temporary injunction was filed along-with
the main suit; and the petitioner was not a contestant on the
target date i.e. 31.8.02, but neither any order was suspended
by this Hon’ble Court nor the nomination papers were
accepted on the direction of this Hon’ble Court. The
remaining para is not correct is totally self-explanatory.
3. That the contents of para No. 3 are correct upto the extent of
particulars of respondent No. 1, the remaining para is self-
explanatory. After the dismissal of the suit from Hon’ble
Court, the fate of the petitioners and others was totally
dependant upon the elected body of P.C.G.A.
4. That the contents of para No. 4 are correct upto the extent of
engagement of counsel, the remaining para is self-
explanatory.
Humble Respondents,
Dated: ___________
Through: -
Sheikh Muhammad Faheem,
Advocate High Court,
28-District Courts, Multan.
C.C. No. 20176
IN THE COURT OF MIAN MUHAMMAD RIAZ KHURRAM,
CIVIL JUDGE, MULTAN.
WRITTEN REPLY
AFFIDAVIT of: -
Mahboob Alam, Additional Secretary, P.C.G.A.
Multan.
DEPONENT
Verification: -
Verified on oath at Multan, this _____ day
of December 2002 that the contents of this
affidavit are true & correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. Nothing has been kept
concealed thereto.
DEPONENT