Anda di halaman 1dari 11

Annexure 1 Dalmia Cements (Bharat) Limited, Performance Management System (D-PMS)

D - PMS YEAR : 2011 to 2012

Name : Employee Code : Function : Grade / Level : Designation :

V.RAMACHANDRA RAJU KA 93151 PROCESS CX SENIOR ENGINEER

PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 1. Performance Planning will be done after finalization of business/functional objectives and plans. The individual KRAs will flow from these plans. These shall be finalized by the appraise through a formally laid down process and signed off by both by March 31st for the next

2. The HR department will facilitate the Performance Planning exercise in terms of translating the business objectives into individual KRAs by organizing KRA planning workshops wherever necessary. 3. The performance planning discussion will address the following issues : a. Role of appraise, in the light of business /functional plans. b. KRAs, which would be a mix of Financial, Operations Improvement, Customer Satisfaction, Self development. i. The total number of KRAs should not exceed 6-8. Task related KRAs should not exceed 5-6 and their weightage would be ii. 100% 4. Following points should be considered at the time of setting the KRAs : What element of stretch is going to be built into the targets? Are the KRAs SMART , i.e Specific, Measurable, Attainable, relevant & Time Bound ? What support will be required by the appraise to achieve these KRAs? 5. The finalized KRAs should be documented in section 2of the D-PMS form and signed off by both the appraiser & the appraise. 6. Half Yearly review would be carried out to assess the performance of the individual at the end of 2 quarter. The annual review shall be at the end of the fourth quarter & would take into account the feedback of the half yearly assessment of the entire year. 7. At the end of the fourth quarter, the appraisee would do a self appraisal before appraisal discussion with the appraiser. The appraiser would fill in his annual assessment and calculate the score for every KRA (Score =weightage x % achieved). The overall score would be the sum of the scores for all the KRAs, which the appraiser would mention in section 4 and mark the corresponding overall rating. 8. The appraiser shall give his detailed feedback in section 4, on appraisees performance during the entire year and fill up the development plan after discussions with the appraisee. 9. The reviewer shall also give his comments in the form. 10. Incase of promotion, please fill section 5 of the form.
nd

Section 1 Personal particulars Date of Birth:20.05.1981 Current Grade: CX Date of joining DCBL:06.06.2008 Current Designation : SENIOR ENGINEER In current position since:06.06.2008

Qualification: B.E, (CHEMICAL ENGINEERING)

Career details in DCBL


Date from 06.06.2008 Date to Till Date Grade / Level CX Designation senior engineer Key responsibilities handled Operation Kiln & all mills

Developmental inputs received


Date from 12.09.2011 Date to 14.09.2011 Area of Training KILN SYSTEMS Provided by DALMIAPURAM,FLS

Any Other Special Recognition :

INTERNAL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION BY MONITORING DEPARTMENT PERSONNELS INFORMATION TO THE CONCERNED DEPTS. AND HELP THEM DURING CRISIS SITUATION. ORGANISING EQUIPMENTS START UP BEFORE BY GETTING RELEVENT INFORMATION FROM CONCERNED DEPTS. REDUCING REPORTABLE ACCIDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENT ACHIEVED ZERO REDUCING NON-REPORTABLE ACCIDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENT ACHIEVED ZERO MONITORING CLEAN ATMOSPHERE BY MONITORING KILN CHIMNY EMISSION MONITORING COAL MILL CHIMNY EMISSION MONITORING COOLER CHIMNY EMISSION SELF DEVELOPMENT BY ATTENDING SEMINORS/TRAINING CLASSESS SELF/SUB ORDINATE DEVELOPMENT/ EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION 3 CASE STUDIES IN ALL SECTIONS DEVELOPING 4 PERSONS IN THE DEPARTMENT BY CONDUCTING 4 CLASSES UPTO MARCH'2012 MONITORING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ORGANISATIONS VALUES LIKE LEARNING, SPEED, EXCELLENCE AND TEAM WORK ALONG SELF

65

75

85

90

95

31.03.12

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

1 1

2 2

4 4

5 5

6 6

31.03.12 15 31.03.12

60 Mg 60 Mg 60 Mg 1 1 1

55 Mg 55 Mg 55 Mg 2 2 2

50 Mg 50 Mg 50 Mg 3 3 3

45 Mg 45 Mg 45 Mg 4 4 4

40 Mg 40 Mg 40 Mg 5 5 5

31.03.12 31.03.12 31.03.12 31.03.12 31.03.12 15

31.03.12

Signature and date (Appraisee)

Signature and date (Appraiser)

Section 3 Half Yearly Review and Re-alignment of KRAs (April to September) Areas Self Appraisal
MONITORING OF KILN BUDGET POWER 20.7 U/T MAT. ACHIEVED 19.37 U/TON MAT KILN FEED NOT REDUCED EVEN THOUGH ADDITIVE SHED COLLAPSED MONITORING OF COAL MILL POWER 32.00 U/T MAT. ACHIEVED 28.07 U/TON MAT EVEN THOUGH COAL & PET COKE ADULTRATION TAKEN PLACE IN THE COAL TRANSPORTATION AND IN PET COKE GRINDING CONSISTANT ACHIEVEMENT OF FUEL CONSUMPTION 713 K CAL/KG CL.AT 4000 TPD AND 700 AT 5400 TPD LEVEL.ACIEVED 719 KCAL/KG CL DUE TO HARD BURNING MATERIAL MAINTAINING 5 MINUTES STOPPAGE IN KILN WITH 1 FREQUENCY/DAY. ACHIEVED 4.5 MIN /DAY MAXIMUM UTILIZSATION OF EXPERT SYTEM FORCOAL MILL AND KILN. CONTROLLING OF REFRACTORY CONSUMPTION TO 400 GMS/T CLINKER ACHIEVED 300 GR/TON CL CONSISTENT ACHIEVEMENT OF KILN TARGETED OUT PUT 203 TPH(4876 TPD ) ACHIEVED 4176 TPD DUE TO LOW DESPATCHES CONSISTANT ACHIEVEMENT OF COAL MILL TARGET OUT PUT OF 40 TPH FOR NORMAL COAL AND 20 TPH FOR PET COKE.ACHIEVED 31.6 TPH DUE TO INDONESIAN COAL AND PET COKE GRINDING MAINTAINING 1.5% FREE LIME, ACHIEVED 1.35 % MAINTAINING STORES CONSUMPTION AT Rs: 3/MT CLINKER ACHIEVED 4.88 RS/TON CL INTERNAL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION BY MONITORING DEPARTMENT PERSONNELS INFORMATION TO THE CONCERNED DEPARTMENTS AND HELP THEM DURING CRISIS SITUATION. ORGANISING EQUIPMENTS START UP BEFORE BY GETTING RELEVENT INFORMATION FROM CONCERNED DEPTS. MONITORING CLEAN ATMOSPHERE BY MONITORING KILN STACK EMISSION, ACHIEVED 36 mg/Nm3 MONITORING COAL MILL STACK EMISSION ,ACHIEVED 36 mg/Nm3 MONITORING COOLER STACK EMISSION 42 mg/Nm3

Score (75,85,100,110,125%) 125

Weightage

weighted score (Score * weightage %)

125 35 44

FINANCIAL

110 100 100 125 110

OPERATIONS & PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS

110 125 75

35

39

115 15 125 125 125 18

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Section 4 OVERALL RATING

(EP)

(OP)
Outstanding Performer

(GP)

(SP)

(BAP)
Below Average Performer

Exceptional Performer

Good Performer

Satisfactory Performer

>=115% & above

100%-114%

86%-99%

76-85%

<= 75%

Any other recommendation (Promotion/Salary) :-

Date & Signature of Appraisee:

Date & Signature of Appraiser:

* Please note that the above is your supervisors recommendation. But the final rating that will be considered by HR will be based on the decision post the normalization meetings for the location, which will be based on the distribution pattern based on the overall performance of the business.

Normalization Decision (Final rating & Reason)

Date & Signature of Appraisee:

Date & Signature of Appraiser:

Section 5 Promotion Form

Ratings in last two appraisal cycle: Total Years of experience Experience in DCBL :

Current Grade: OUT STANDING 12 YEARS 3YEARS 4 MONTHS Qualification: Any Other: CX B.E,(CHEMICAL ENGINEERING)

Career Path in DCBL S No.

Particulars of Roles handled

Period

Proposed Promotion Grade & Designation:

Future Role to be handled

Potential assessment / Justification for Promotion

Additional Remarks by HOD

Signature of Immediate Superior


Approval: (To be filled by Promotion Evaluation Committee) Reasons for Approval (Please keep Organization/ Business Perspective in Mind)

Signature of HOD

Name

Designation

Signature

Date:

Section 6 Development Planning Competencies Key 1-2 Development Needs Strength Adequate Development Need

Development Strategy

Signature of Appraiser Reviewers Comments

Signature of Reviewer