LEMIGAS
JL. CILEDUG RAYA, CIPULIR, KEBAYORAN LAMA JAKARTA 12230 , PO. BOX 1089 JAKARTA 10010 PHONE : 021-7394760, 7394422 (7 LINES) Ext. 1427, FAX : 021-7222978
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
Background
Objective
2.4
CONTENTS
(Continued)
2.5 Determination of injection water quality. a. Compatibility or not between injection water (IW) with formation water (FW) ? b. Scaling problem ? c. Emulsion block problem ? d. Bacteria problem ? e. Dissolved oxygen problem? f. Corrosion problem ? g. High total suspended solids concentration
CONTENTS
2.6 Problem solving.
(Continued)
a. Incompatible water IW with FW b. Scaling problem c. Emulsion block problem d. Bacteria problem e. Dissolved oxygen problem f. Corrosion problem
CONTENTS
(Continued)
III. CONCLUSIONS
I. INTRODUCTION
I.1 Background a. The decrease of oil production. b. The cumulative oil production has approached ultimate primary recovery. I.2 Objective To set up scope of works based on standard operational procedure (SOP), which are specially focused on complete
IW3
Water - GS
River water
River water
Produced water
Formation water
2.647
SD : Gy,hd, vf-fg, sbang-sbrnd,mod-w srtd, qtz, sl mica, v sli arg, SD : Gy-ltbrn, hd, vf-mg, sbang-sbrnd,mod srtd, qtz, sli sli/loc calc
Nama Sumur Nomor Sampel Kedalaman (ft) Length, cm Diameter, cm 2 Acre, cm Bulk Volume, cc Core Weight, gr Grain Volume, cc Pore Volume, cc, (measured) Air Permeability, mD Porosity, % Grain density, gr/cc
: I - 38 : 6B : 3160.05 = 5.740 = 3.800 = 11.335 = 65.098 = 131.415 = 49.326 = 15.772 = 152.400 = 24.228 = 2.664
Nama Sumur Nomor Sampel Kedalaman (ft) Length, cm Diameter, cm 2 Acre, cm Bulk Volume, cc Core Weight, gr Grain Volume, cc Pore Volume, cc, (measured) Air Permeability, mD Porosity, % Grain density, gr/cc
: I - 38 : 7A : 3166.46 = 5.400 = 3.800 = 11.335 = 61.242 = 121.611 = 45.944 = 15.298 = 37.130 = 24.979 = 2.647
SD : Gy,hd, vf-fg, sbang-sbrnd,mod-w srtd, qtz, sli mica, v sli arg, sli/loc calc
SD : Gy-ltbrn, hd, vf-mg, sbang-sbrnd,mod srtd, qtz, sli mica, v sli arg
6B 7A
I # -38 I # -38
3160.05 3166.46
37.13 152.4
24.979 24.228
17 18
41 38
28 42
CRO-1, Wt %
CRO-3, Wt %
Methane Ethane Propane i-butane n-butane i-pentane n-pentane Hexanes Heptanes Octanes Nonanes Decanes Undecanes Dodecanes Tridecanes Tetradecanes Pentadecanes Hexadecanes Heptadecanes Octadecanes Nonadecanes Eicosanes Heneicosanes Docosanes Tricosanes Tetracosanes Pentacosanes Hexacosanes Heptacosanes Octacosanes Nonacosanes Triancontanes Heneitriacontanes Dotriacontanes Tritriacontanes Tetratriacontanes Pentatriacontanes Hexatriacontanes Heptatriacontanes Octatriacontanes Nonatriacontanes Tetracontanes
CH4 C2 H 6 C3 H 8 C4H10 C4H10 C5H12 C5H12 C6H14 C7H16 C8H18 C9H20 C10H22 C11H24 C12H26 C13H28 C14H30 C15H32 C16H34 C17H36 C18H38 C19H40 C20H42 C21H44 C22H46 C23H48 C24H50 C25H52 C26H54 C27H56 C28H58 C29H60 C30H62 C31H64 C32H66 C33H68 C34H70 C35H72 C36H74 C37H76 C38H78 C39H80 C40H82 Total
0.0000 0.0221 0.1629 0.1274 0.2883 0.4006 0.3951 0.9419 1.8162 7.3997 4.0547 3.5969 5.0572 4.0538 6.8126 5.8682 5.8547 5.7156 4.3576 5.6688 3.8111 2.9937 3.3151 3.1308 2.8668 2.7796 2.7294 2.5015 2.4867 2.2560 2.3316 2.1221 1.4093 0.9040 0.8750 0.3166 0.2400 0.1093 0.0816 0.0484 0.0385 0.0586 100.0000
0 0.0084 0.0319 0.0359 0.0772 0.112 0.1172 0.5074 1.8433 4.971 5.9202 4.3084 5.3594 5.2628 6.1243 7.9412 7.001 4.8043 4.8512 5.2039 3.3483 2.614 2.6758 2.5965 2.3238 2.4395 2.2876 2.2254 2.2204 2.2989 2.1825 2.1124 1.6968 1.3498 1.2893 0.6684 0.465 0.2954 0.1926 0.1188 0.0801 0.0377 100.0000
Table 2.4.1 The Results of Injection Water and Formation Water Analysis With Using API RP45 Method
Laboratory Tests Dissolved Solids Cation (mg/l) Sodium, Na (calc) Calcium, Ca Iron, Fe
++ ++ ++ +
IW1 - GS
FW - 1
FW - 3
Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 837.80 109.10 15.90 0.00 70.00 850.20 80.80 7.40 0.00 11.00 1.10 12.10 0.00 3.40 0.00 644.90 92.90 9.80 4.50 0.60
Magnesium, Mg Barium, Ba
++
(total)
Anion (mg/L) Chloride, Cl Bicarbonate, HCO3 Sulfate, SO4 Hydroxide Other Properties Specific Gravity, 60/60 oF pH @ 77 oF Total hardness Hydrogen Sulphide Total equivalent, NaCl TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) TSS (Total Suspended Solids) Resistivity (ohm - meter)
= =
1,338.90 379.10 11.00 0.00 0.00 1.0058 7.85 125.00 0.00 2,414.60 2,820.00 22.75 1.32 @ 125 0F
1,160.40 550.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.0043 8.00 88.20 0.00 2,250.60 2,720.00 245.00 1.41 @ 125 0F
17.90 9.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0078 5.85 30.25 Nil 33.00 40.30 62.00 > 10
856.90 568.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0078 7.8 272.43 Nil 2,173.70 5,410.00 78.00 101.75
Carbonate, CO3
(ohm - meter)
300.00 250.00
245.00
100.00
78.00 73.80
166.00 115.00
TSS (mgr/L)
TSS (mgr/L)
69.80
65.70
62.00
59.50
50.00 0.00 0 % IW1 + 100 % FW1 25 % IW1 + 75 % FW1 50 % IW1 + 50 % FW1 75 % IW1+ 25 % FW1
22.75
0.00
0 % IW3 + 25 % IW3 + 50 % IW3 + 75 % IW3 + 100 % IW3 100 % FW3 75 % FW3 50 % FW3 25 % FW3 + 0 % FW3
Mixing Ratio
Mixing Ratio
Figure 2.5.1a The results of water compatibility tests between IW1 GS with FW1
Figure 2.5.1b The results of water compatibility tests between IW3 RW with FW3
11
12
Table 2.5.2.1 Results of CaCO3 Scaling Index Tendency and CaSO4 Solubility Calculations With Using Stiff and Davis Method
No. Laboratory Tests Units Injection Water IW1 - GS IW3 - RW
1 2 3 4 5 6
Calcium, Ca+2 Bicarbonate, HCO3Carbonate, CO3= Sulfate pH CaCO3 scaling Index (SI) Scaling Index at 77 oF Scaling Index at 140 oF Scaling Index at 175 oF Remarks CaCO3 scale at 77 oF CaCO3 scale at 140 F CaCO3 scale at 175 F
o o
SI > 0, Formed SI > 0, Formed SI > 0, Formed meq/l meq/l meq/l meq/l 0.2292 25.93 25.93 25.65 Solubility > than Actual CaSO4 conc. Unformed
SI > 0, Formed SI > 0, Formed SI > 0, Formed 0.0000 21.61 21.52 18.67 Solubility > than Actual CaSO4 conc. Unformed
Actual CaSO4 conc. Solubility at 77 oF Solubility at 140 oF Solubility at 175 oF Remarks CaSO4 scale
13
10.00 1.00 y = 4.9971e-0.0084x 0.10 0.01 0 50 100 150 200 250 R = 0.9686
2
0.10
Figure 2.5.2.1 The Result of Relative Plugging Index (RPI) of IW1 GS before treatment
Figure 2.5.2.2 The Result of Relative Plugging Index (RPI) of IW3 RW before treatment
14
y = 3.7302e-0.0009x 2 R = 0.8994
1.75 2.73
Eff
Injection water
Figure 2.6.2.1 Influence of scale inhibitor On TSS and RPI of IW1 GS injection water
Figure 2.6.2.2 Inhibition Efficiency of CaCO3 scale with 15 scale inhibitor in IW1 GS injection water
150
TSS, ppm
(RPI
100 62 50
96.09
8 0
IW3 - RW + 0 ppm Alum
10.93
4 6.93
IW3 - RW + 60 ppm Alum
Injection water
Figure 2.6.2.2 Influence of Alum On TSS and RPI of IW3 RW injection water
16
IW1-GS IW1-GS
IW1-GS + rev.S
100 % T r a n s m i t t a n c e
80
60
CH3
40
20
CH2
0 3200
3100
2800
2700
2960 cm-1 for CH3 dan 2925 cm-1 for CH2 Qualitative Kualitatif Oil content in water by Infra Red Spectrophotometer
100.00
50.00
5.49 6.33 8.56
0.00
IW S -G 1 1 S -G +1 p 0p 1 m -S p 0p m 8 -7 A +1 S -G p 0p m 8 -6 A
IW
IW
+1 S -G
IW
21
Table 2.5.4
IW1 - GS
IW3 - RW
22
Table - 2.6.4 Results of Total bacteria Count Determination Before Treatment With Biocide
Water sample IW1 - GS Type of Bacteria Bacillus Panthothenticus Bacillus Pumilus Bacillus Subtilis Bacillus Panthothenticus Bacillus Coagulans Total bacteria Count (colonies/cc) 1,950
IW3 - RW
2,550
1950
3000.00 2500.00 Total Bacteria 2000.00 Count 1500.00 (colonies/cc) 1000.00 500.00 0.00
2550
6 6 5 5 6 6 5 -B -B -B -B -B -B -B pm ppm ppm ppm pm ppm ppm 0 p 5 10 15 5 p 10 15 S + GS + S + S + S+ S+ S+ G G G -G -G -G 1- 11IW IW IW1 IW1 IW IW1 IW1
5 6 6 5 5 6 6 -B -B -B -B -B -B -B pm ppm ppm ppm pm ppm ppm p 0 p 5 10 15 + 5 10 15 W+ W + W + W + W W+ W+ R -R R R R -R 3-R 3 - 3IW IW3 IW3 IW3 IW IW IW3
23
5.00
5.00
2.77
2.73 2.71
0.00
0.00
-D -D -D -D -D -D -D -D m m m m m m m m pp 0 pp 5 pp 0 pp pp 0 pp 5 pp 0 pp 0 1 + 0 3 .7 + +1 3 .7 S + S+ W W + W+ - G GS + 1 - G - GS - R RW 3 - R - R 1 3 3 IW IW IW1 IW 13IW IW IW IW
2.6.6 Determination of Corrosion Rate (Electrochemically) Before and After Treatment with Corrosion inhibitor
1.00
0.533
Efficiency (%)
0.50 0.00
0.218
100.00
59.13 48.08
99.58
81.88
50.00 0.00
0.00
-G S
pp m
-G S
pp
pp
pp
pp m
pp m
IW
10
20
20
10
IW
10
10
pp m
-G S+
20
-G S
-G S
-G S
-G S
-G S
-G S
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
-G S
20
pp m
27
60.00
[TSS], ppm
38.45
60.00
31.85
40.25
RPI
40.00
13.73
12.15 8.29
20.00 0.00
IW - A
6.53
7.69
5.65
Injection Water
Injection Water
Figure A1 Influence of Filtration and Scale Inhibitor On Total Suspended Solids Concentration
2.00 1.60
Kiw , mD
250.00
Air Formasi
Permeabilitas air, md
Air Injeksi
200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 0.0 5.0 10.0 Pore Volume 15.0 20.0
30
2. Formation water is injected into core, so that the core is filled fully by formation water.
Core Fw Fw
3. Oil is injected into core, then formation water is displaced out and core is filled by totally oil. However, not all of formation water is displaced out of the core, part of amount of formation water is left in the core, this is called connate water.
4. Formation water is injected into core, then oil in the core is displaced by formation water until oil is not out of the core anymore. However, not all of oil is displaced out of the core, part of amount of crude oil is left in the core, this is called residual oil saturation (Sor1).
5. Determination of oil recovery factor by using water flood method. Injection water is injected into core, then oil is displaced and produced. Recoverable oil is recorded. The remaining amount of oil in the core is called residual oil saturation (Sor2). In this stage, oil recovery factor and injected water cumulative (volume of injection water) can be calculated.
Core
Injection water
Residual oil
Table 2.8.1 The Results of Oil Recovery Factor After Primary and Secondary Oil Recovery Methods
I # 38, CORE NO.7A, I FIELD
Core No. Permeability, Porosity Connate Water Ka Ko,avg Kw, avg Saturation, Swc mD mD mD % % After First Phase Sor1 WID1 RF1 % % After Second Phase Sor2 WID2 RF2 % % The Incremental of Oil Rec. Factor, Calculated from The First Phase
7A
37.13
5.79
3.55
24.94
38.11
30.06
4.63
31.83
28.23
15.38
33.66
1.83
100 90
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Water Injected, PV
Secondary
Primary Primary
Table - 3.8.2 SUMMARY OF THE LABORATORY TEST RESULTS AFTER THE FIRST AND SECOND PHASES OF OIL RECOVERY FACTOR I # 38, CORE NO.6B, I FIELD
Core No. Permeability, Porosity Connate Water Ko,avg Kw, avg Saturation, Swc mD mD % % After First Phase Sor1 WID1 RF1 % % After Second Phase Sor2 WID2 RF2 % % The Incremental of Oil Rec. Factor, Calculated from The First Phase
Ka mD
6B
152.40
9.99
116.18
24.18
21.83
42.20
2.16
35.97
39.88
9.82
38.29
2.32
100 90 80
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 Water Injected, PV 8 10 12
Primary
Secondary
Figure 3.9.6 Oil recovery vs Water Injected I # 38, Core no. 6B, I Field
CONCLUSIONS
1. IW1 GS dan IW3 RW indicate poor water quality, because both waters have high total suspended solids and high relative plugging index values. 2. IW1 GS has positive scaling index, CaCO3 scaling problem can be prevented with addition of scale inhibitor into injection water, whereas IW3 RW indicates negative scaling index, so CaCO3 is not found in the IW3 - RW injection water. 3. IW1 GS and IW3 RW are compatible with formation water. 4. After treatment with 20 ppm P scale inhibitor, IW1 GS shows excellent water quality with 1.75 ppm TSS concentration and 2.75 RPI value and 96.10 % inhibition efficiency of CaCO3 scale. 5. Octane is dominant component in IW1 GS injection water and tetradecane in IW3 RW injection water.
36
CONCLUSIONS (continued)
6. TSS problem in IW3 RW injection water can be minimized with addition of 60 ppm alum into the injection water, TSS concentration is 4.00 ppm and RPI values is 6.93. 7. a. Biocide is used to reduce total bacteria count in IW1 GS and IW3 RW. b. Emulsion block problem is prevented with addition of reverse demulsifier. c. Corrosion problem is reduced with using corrosion inhibitor. d. Dissolved oxygen is minimized by oxygen scavanger 8. Water-rock compatibility test is done to know about influence of injection water on core permeability.
9. High or low oil recovery factor , not only influenced by core permeability, but also good or poor injection water is injected into the core.
37