By
Prasant Rout
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Executive Post Graduate Programme XLRI, Jamshedpur 2001-04
to Prof A K Pani
XLRI, Jamshedpur Abstract ERP IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES, ROI, TRANSFOMING TO E-BUSINESS : A OIL INDUSTRY CASE STUDY by Prasant Rout Dissertation Guide: Dr Ashis K Pani Department of Information System
An ERP Journey normally has all the thrills, heartbreaks and hard work that is involved in a traditional Indian marriage. The decision is taken amidst much fanfare and celebration, the preparations to receive the new entrant are hectic and occasionally full of tension, and the actual internalization often falls short of expectations in the initial phase, and needs lot of mindset adjustments to make the marriage really successful. Business process re-engineering is a need in the liberalized economy to remain competitive and e-commerce is emerging as the new business model. The paper describes the ERP implementation issues, cost benefit analysis and e-business initiatives based on the case study of two large oil companies of India. The focus of the research article is the organizational, technical, transition management issues in ERP implementation. Most of the factors attributable to the success of ERP implementation are not technical but organizational and cultural in nature. Can ERP and BPR go hand-in-hand or BPR will follow an ERP implementation are issues of concern for management before committing exorbitant cost for the ERP implementation. The other focus area of the research article is the illusive ROI on ERP. Finally, the article discusses the e-business initiatives in the oil sector, based on the technology platform of the ERP. The recent directive by Central Vigilance Commission advising the organizations to decide and work out a detailed procedure for eProcurement/reverse auction has encouraged the Oil PSUs to take initiatives in this regard. The cycle time for procurement and transaction cost is envisaged to be reduced significantly in the oil sector with positive impact on the bottom line. The ERP/E-business matrix framework is
discussed for the present and future positioning of the organizations in the Information Revolution the Third Wave.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Introduction Oil Industry Case Study ERP implementation issues ROI on ERP e-Business Initiative on ERP platform Conclusion
LIST OF FIGURES
Number
Page
1. Oil Industry Physical Process 2. Oil Industry Business Process 3. ERP Framework 4. ERP and Add-on Application Framework 5. Terrestrial Network Layout 6. V-SAT Landscape 7. Data Center Server Land Scape 8. Disaster Site Framework 9. MAN Framework
1 2-3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author wishes to sincerely thank Prof Ashis Kumar Pani for his support and guidance in compilation of the dissertation case study. I sincerely thank, Sh Arup Kumar Bhagabati, Senior Manager of ERP technology group of IOCL for providing information on the IOCL ERP project titled Manthan. I also thank all colleagues and seniors working in different locations of IOCL for sharing their experience in ERP implementation, which is a strategic asset in planning a mega ERP project with minute details.
iii
GLOSSARY
Word. [Click and type definition here.] ( To be Completed after final compilation )
iv
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
In todays Information Technology and era of globalisation, one of the easiest decisions to take seems to be to put in an ERP Software into the organization. An ERP Journey normally has all the thrills, heartbreaks and hard work that is involved in a traditional Indian marriage. The decision is taken amidst much fanfare and celebration, the preparations to receive the new entrant are hectic and occasionally full of tension, and the actual internalization often falls short of expectations in the initial phase, and needs a lot of Mindset adjustments to make the marriage really successful. The flexibility of modern-day ERP Applications is a result of their evolution from the older Material Requirement Planning (MRP) and next generation Manufacturing Resources Planning (MRP II) and Distribution Requirements Planning (DRP) Applications. Todays ERP Systems have hundreds, even thousands of imbedded Application Parameters and Logic Tables that lend themselves to adaptation to specific Company decision Rules and Procedures. This often gives the false notion that virtually any Company can implement and benefit from the Package. In reality, whatever be the Product, a hard look at the Business Processes of the enterprise is a necessary step in clearing the decks for a successful ERP Implementation. But before we go into all that jargon, statistics and other analysis, its important to know and understand few basics.
What is ERP ?
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is software driven business management system which integrates all facets of the business, including planning, manufacturing, sales, and marketing. The business environment has become increasingly complex and the marketplace has changed from local to global. Management world over esp. in Developing Countries like India is under constant pressure to improve competitiveness by lowering operating costs and improving logistics. Organizations therefore have to be more responsive to the customer and competition. ERP as a business solution aims to help the management by setting better business practices and equipping them with the right information to take timely decisions.
Evolution of ERP
The history of ERP can be traced back to the 1960s, when the focus of systems was mainly towards inventory control. Most of the systems software were designed to handle inventory based in traditional inventory concepts. Later in a 1970s a shift was witnessed to focus towards MRP. This system helped in
translating the master production schedule into requirements for individual units like sub assemblies, components and other raw material planning and procurement. This system was involved mainly in planning the raw material requirements. Further, in 1980s the concept of MRP-II came up, which involved optimizing the entire plant production process. Though MRP-II, in the beginning was an extension of MRP to include shop floor and distribution management activities, during later years, MRP-II was further extended to include areas like Finance, Human Resource, Engineering, Project Management etc. This gave birth to ERP which covered the cross-functional coordination and integration in support of the production process. The ERP as compared to its ancestors included the entire range of a companys activities.
Most ERP systems were designed to be used by discreet manufacturing companies (who make physical things that can be counted), which immediately left all the process manufacturers (oil, chemical and utility companies that measure their products by flow rather than individual units) out in the cold. Each of these industries has struggled with the different ERP vendors to modify core ERP programs to their needs.
ERP addresses both system requirements and technology aspects including client/server distributed architecture, RDBMS/OLTP application, data ware housing/OLAP applications, portal and e-commerce.
Evaluation Criteria
A Company's management first interacts with ERP systems most often in the grueling vendor-selection process. Focusing the ERP system selection on a single vendor often results in a search conducted without data, with no identifiable evaluation criteria, and no vision of the value of the system. Experience and research have revealed four major stumbling blocks to successful vendor selection. These are: Time: The ERP software selection process in a medium to large organization can consume up to 12-15 months, with much of the effort spent identifying the key evaluation criteria and collecting data on the alternatives. Cost: A major part of the total cost of ERP software selection is largely hidden in the employee time mentioned above. Personal and travel expenses incurred during the selection process, developing RFP, gathering and validating product data, and interviewing vendors contribute to almost 25-30% of the overall cost. Validated Data: Organizations have reported that they lack objective, validated data on vendor products and services, and are often forced to rely solely on the vendor RFP responses, presentations, or marketing materials, to make their final decision.
Unstructured Selection Process: With the absence of a structured and rigorous selection methodology, many organizations end up either focusing on a very limited set of criteria or caving into internal political agendas or gut feelings. The most important criteria for selecting an ERP solution is the functionality. This is where most of the companies are now focusing on getting the best-of-breed solutions. The return on investment justifies the extra cost that one has to pay to get the best-configured solution. The technical architecture evaluates the fit between the information system and the end user's needs by looking at the environment in which the application is available, the user-interface capabilities, the third-party software interface capabilities, the software architecture of the application, the development and management tools associated with the application, and the data and process models available with the application. To sum up, Evaluating ERP software on the below mentioned criteria can help companies select the software packages that makes the best sense for them. The general Factors which go in to evaluating and assessing a ERP solution or software are: Functional fit with the Companys business processes Degree of integration between the various components of the ERP system Flexibility and scalability User friendliness and Ease of implementation Ability to support multi-site planning and control Technology - client/server capabilities, database independence, security Amount of customization required Local support infrastructure Reputation and sustainability of the ERP vendor Total costs, including cost of license, training, implementation, maintenance, customization and hardware requirements.
ERP in India
Until recently Indian organizations were in a sellers market and operating in a regulated environment. They grew by managing the environment, rather than innovating and improving internal efficiencies. The customer was taken for granted and quality was available only at a premium. With globalization and gradual lifting of regulation, there is a paradigm shift in running the business.
Indian companies therefore need to implement ERP systems for improving their business processes and becoming more competitive in the global environment. Though ERP implementation is costly and time consuming, it has several benefits which will help recover these costs in the long run. According to NASSCOM, during the year 1998-99, the Indian ERP market has been estimated at Rs 200mn compared to Rs 2800mn in the year 2001-02 ie a growth of 85% yoy. The growth in the export market was far higher and more than doubled during the same time period. According to the NASSCOM, In FY2001-02, the total Indian ERP market is nearly 4 times and has reached Rs 65bn compared to Rs13.4bn in 1998-99.
% yoy
Exports 700.0
% yoy
Total 1,200.0
% yoy
157.1 88.9
2,700.0 6,200.0
Source: NASSCOM
Companies of all sizes and industries are installing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software in order to improve business processes or replace aging enterprise systems. The core set of technologies and capabilities needed to accomplish the desired results is often not obtainable in-house, due to high costs and lack of resources. This means that ERP customers must find ways to engage top-notch ERP experts According to IDC, the ERP market in India has been witnessing a CAGR of 20-30 percent consistently over the last 5-6 years. As a result, the market was already at Rs 250 crore in 1999-2000, leapfrogging from Rs 12 crore in 1995-96, Rs 27 crore in 1996-97, Rs 62 crore in 1997-98 and Rs134 crore in 1998-99. Therefore, the
Indian ERP market touching Rs 460 crore in 2000-01, accounting for nearly 8.4 percent of the total Asia-Pacific market for ERP solutions should have hardly caused surprise.
The year also witnessed some tangible quantitative benefits for Indian companies coming out of ERP implementation. BPCLs implementation of SAP R/3 resulted in total annual saving of Rs 40 crore, Fosters India brought down its inventory from 20 days to less than a week with QAD MFG/PRO and more ERP success stories were being suddenly churned out dime-a-dozen.
Adoptions Status of ERP in India (%) Small Medium Large (< 50 (50-499 (> 500 employees) Employees) employees) Number of PC owning organizations who are aware 45029 16572 4063 of ERP across top 8 cities of India
Implemented Planning/ Evaluating Not considering seriously Refused to answer Source: IDC (India)
1. As can be seen from the table, a sizeable number of the large organizations have already implemented the ERP solution or planning to do so. The current requirement according to the report, is for enhancing their existing solutions to incorporate front office solutions (CRM) and supply chain solutions (SCM) and having the solutions internet enabled to move towards e-Business. 2. Another noticeable trend in the table is the fact that over 5% mid-sized organizations are planning to implement ERP, which when translated into absolute numbers mean volume business. Hence, at present, the mid-sized organizations would fuel the sales of point solutions. This has resulted in the need for new type of partnerships for the ERP vendors. With the CRM and SCM markets expected to grow rapidly.
the ERP vendors price on a per-named user basis, buying more functional modules from a single vendor can push down the average cost per user. However, integrated applications are not a foolproof solution. Firstly, since integrated implementations require enterprise wide consensus, they require more time. Given the ERP software currently available, each of them is strong in some functional area and weak in the others. This has made more and more customers want the best from each of these software and integrate them, so that they have the most effective solution for their organization.
Return on Investment From the perspective of top management of any firm, it is the quick return on investment that makes ERP II very attractive. The pay back period is very short ranging from 2-3 months since the implementation cycle is short. The CRM and SCM modules makes the transaction cost less. Whats important is that in the case of ERP II, investment in subsequent phases (to address other business processes) can often be funded from the benefits derived from the earlier phase. Ease of use Thanks to its open, Web-based and componentized architecture, ERP II is flexible and easy to use. This also makes the change management exercise in user organizations far simpler. In fact, according to Gartner, by the year 2005, ERP vendors failure to develop architectural componentization will be the single largest cause of vendor deselection. This will lead many traditional ERP vendors to take to ERP II. Towards c-commerce with ERP II Another point of contention between traditional ERP and ERP II is in terms of the respective roles of the two. The role and vision of ERP centers around resource planning, inventory accuracy, and visibility beyond the plant and throughout the manufacturing enterprise. The fundamental assumptions/principles on which ERP was built are based on business processes designed for mass production, and control of the enterprise, with its foundation not built for collaboration. However, the role of ERP II expands the role of ERP a design to optimize the enterprises resources to one of enabling and optimizing interenterprise collaborative, operational and financial processes, leading to c-commerce (collaborative commerce) enablement and value chain participation. Deeper domain functionality There are certain fundamental functional and architectural holes in most traditional ERP systems for non-manufacturing industries. Again, ERP II scores as its domain expands beyond traditional ERPs domain of manufacturing and distribution to include non-manufacturing industries as well.
Implementation
No ERP software can benefit an organization unless it is implemented well. Implementation costs are typically twice or even thrice the cost of the product.
Strategy
Process
Technology
Business Case & Benefits Realization Design a Standardize, Develop, competitive streamline and customize, and strategy driven simplify core integrate IT toward business strategy to operational processes across enable excellence and the enterprise. achievement of customer strategic goals. satisfaction.
People Communicate the mandate for change, engage the entire organization, and enable the changes by training the people on their newly defined roles and responsibilities. Program Leadership & Project Achieve speed and integration in enterprise transformation
10
ERP implementation costs can be segregated as under Technical costs Hardware, software and communication Technical and functional personnel deputed for implementation Data creation costs Creation of master files Conversion of data from legacy systems & building interfaces Training costs Education and training of personnel in use of the ERP system Consultancy fees given to outside professionals Implementation involves customization of the ERP package to suit the user requirements. This requires a thorough understanding of the technical aspects of the ERP package as well as the functional aspects of the business. The approach should be to have a concurrent Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) exercise during the ERP implementation. The focus should shift from business process improvement to technical improvement and vice-versa depending on the situation. Cases where focus would be more on business process improvement are: Traditional org. where improvements to business processes are required. Large customizations are necessary without improvement to business process High level of integration with other systems are required Multiple sites have to be implemented Cases where focus would be more on technical improvements are : Change-minded organization with firm decision making process Company operates according to common business practices. Improvements in business processes are not required immediately
11
12
13
14
Chapter 2
15
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Doe, John B. Conceptual Planning: A Guide to a Better Planet, 3d ed. Reading, MA: SmithJones, 1996.
Smith, Chris. Theory and the Art of Communications Design. State of the University Press, 1997.
16
INDEX
Aristotle,3