the wtc destruction

from: http://www.whilimena.blogspot.com/

i am afraid of these:
(1) fools
(2) crime
(3) poverty
(4) tribalists
(5) religious fanatics

third world mendicants will suffer gravely if there is no independent investigations into
9-11.
i repeat - there will be dire consequencies for third world people if the 9-11 fraud is
allowed to remain as true history.

there will be dire consequences for americans, especially the democrats, if the 9-11 fraud
is allowed to remain as true history.

talking about democrats, they do not know what missile has struck them yet. one
component of the 9-11 scam was 'family rule with the terror tool'.

you see the silly democrats must call for an independent investigation. the constituents
must vote out those blackmailed into submission.

one of the planks for future elections will be: democrats too soft on terror.

with multitudes of willing fools who are terrified about arab terrorists they will vote in
those who say they are tough on terror; even though no one has proven via a single fact,
that any foreign terrorist struck wtc, shanksville or the pentagon.

hasn't anyone of these little third world mendicants thought that something is fishy about
the deaths of citizens from so many nations? the same nations who were later asked to
join the coalition? where were those people 'placed' in the towers? care to find out? don't
mendicants 'put two and two together'?

there has been a few goons who continue to promulgate rumors that september 11, 2001
was the work of one osama bin laden and 19 vicious foreign terrorists.

well, even if the foreigners were involved they were dead before september 11, 2001.

why seven of the suspects were found alive? this was the work of the dirty mossad. you
see, a part of international terror is blackmail; and if you can get crackpots to name 19
dead hijackers then you suddenly expose the fact that seven are still alive; you let the feet
of the blackmailed start wobbling.
from the getgo, let us make something clear - there is no imbroglio about the allegations
of an internal 9-11 scam. none!.

osama bin laden was a cia agent on september 12, 2001. his code name was osman.

the fbi has made it clear that they have not charged bin laden with the september 11,
attacks. maybe we should ask mr. tenet on what grounds he nailed the 19 suckers.

mohammed atta did not die on september 11. he was a mossad operative.
dan, the man, the terrorist accused of shooting the pilots was alive on september 12,
2001.

for people who do not know; one mossad operative 'dies' several times in several
operations.

yes, bin laden may have some knowledge about the crime; but the case against the 19
bushmen cannot hold clean water. and let us make it abundantly clear that the us
embassy in saudi arabia issued 15 of the visas to let in those alleged terrorists.

a few words about the alleged terrorists.

to begin with, those 'terrorists' were too lucky when they resided in the united states. and
did i tell you that on several terrorists' visa applications, a 'terrorist' did not have to list his
specific us address. clearly, a review of the applications and comments from former
embassy staffer mr. springmann; whilimena deduces that the boys were 'let in'.

(for a similar scam read court transcripts of the first wtc scam in 1993 - one of the
terrorist was admitted into the us with his 'terrorist kit'. yes, this is no joke! the
dude entered with his terror kit and instead of the gangsters throwing his ass out;
listen up! he was released on his own recognizance!
so after his release, he merely went out an gathered up his terrorist patsies for the
job. and you'll note that zionist salem; the agent who set up the caper, was paid one
million us dollars for assisting in sinking the arab bogeymen.)

the conspirati, made up of secret agents, gangsters mossad operatives and the
complaisance of third world beggars, all assisted in carrying out the 9-11 plan.

for starters, wanted aliens allegedly in the us on visitors' visas had too many privileges.
they procured credit cards, drivers licenses and opened bank accounts with the help of the
conspirati.

who really did this 9-11 caper?

way back in 2000 one of the hussein boys wrote the 'russian' and identified september 11,
2001 as the date of the attacks.
and you may have thought that the boys were eliminated because they were terrorists.
many of those murdered had knowledge that could implicate the real terrorists.
we must understand that for 9-11 to have been carried out, senior operatives could not
have held all information secret. in fact, numerous reports came in which advised the
conspirati about the impending attacks. however, because of their power and
'barefacedness' the conspirati simply ignored the warnings.

by september 11, 2001, numerous secret service operatives and gangsters knew about the
impending attacks; and many set up viewing posts from various angles. secret services
do this for the purposes of blackmail.

anyone in the 'bidness' will tell you that one of the first commandments of clandestine
work is to collect data for 'retirement'. if one needs advice from the professionals - ask
the dirty mossad. unlike fools like manuel noriega and saddam hussein, real agents
collect data and distribute same 'far and wide'.
incidentally, have you ever thought why the gangsters never touched a hair on mugabe?
have you ever wondered why no one; that is no one, can touch the zionists?

i was working for an 'organization' and one day i went in and said: 'i would like to resign
boss!' and the fellow looked me straight in the eye and said: 'resign? you don't resign
from this work - on with your assignment!'

he did not even give me a hint that there would be further discussions. i later learned that
the 'organization' would have to taint one's reputation before he could leave the
assignments. why? once you are convicted, you loose credibility.

9-11 was orchestrated by the following:

(1) master thugs
(2) politicians, as part of a survival scam
(3) a few crackpots.

as we delve deeper into this review, the above hoods will be exposed further.

now one thing a thug does, is that in committing his crime his getaway plan is never
foolproof. reason is that his lieutenants are afraid to point out weaknesses in his plan;
and because he may intend to 'waste' a few of the players.

military top brass will not ask for help even though the bulk of the intelligence lies under
them.

on september 11, 2001 there were some critical mistakes in the implementation of the
plan. looking through a technical telescope the viewer deduces thus:
(1) some of the operatives did not show up for work
(2) some of the operatives were crackpots.

why?
firstly one missile almost missed the building.

the goons should have known that if two objects struck wtc 1 and 2 from approximate
horizontal angles; 110 stories would have fallen like trees. this is no great scientific
discovery. this is common sense. there was no way in hell that a110 story building could
have collapsed in a vertical trajectory.

most importantly, the sounds made by the collapse do not indicate pancake activity.
and, no 110 story building could make a 'free fall', if it was collapsing because of
weaknesses in its structure.

remember you goons - science is not what it used to be back when you pulled off the jfk
scam.

then to top the mass stupidity, because there was no missile to strike wtc 7, the dingbats
'pulled' it. here a 47 story steel and concrete building descended within its own footprints
(like the other two), even though not even a brick struck it. this action by the conspirati is
what one would call mass stupidity!

we had lucky larry admitting that he ordered wtc 7 pulled.

now over the years people have debated exactly what lucky larry meant when he said
'pull it'. in 2001, lucky larry was a seasoned developer, not a crackpot like some of our
washington friends. when lucky larry said 'pull it'; he meant 'detonate'. he meant nothing
else!

we deduce a few things from the collapses.

(1) wtc 7 should have been struck by a third missile on the morning of september 11.
(2) wtc 1 and 2 were taken out by explosives. why? if wtc 7 came down solely via fire
then explain why you think the 'planes' took out wtc 1 and 2!
(3) firemen reported implosions. this was the reason to delay the release of the
transcripts.

how we know wtc buildings taken out by missiles? the great rummy said so!

no other concrete and steel building collapsed because of fire. none! it did not happen,
and cannot happen. the only way it could happen, is that the building would have to be
placed in a furnace.

let's face it. the kerosine fires were out in 10 minutes. and most importantly, if that fete
occurred as the hoods say it did, then 9-11 would have invented a new science for
smelting companies.

all one would have to do is to get a few hundred gallons of jet fuel and pour it on steel.
and walla! steel melt. no furnace necessary.

folks, the thugs who orchestrated 9-11 had made the wtc entry-holes for the 'planes'. look
at the neatly cut metals in the wtc! look carefully and you will see two neatly cut entry
points where the thugs said that the wings went through. apparently, the wings of the
craft cut straight through the metals and went into the building without a single piece of
those wings fallen off. what nonsense?

someone must have told them that the holes were too neatly done, so the thugs were
firing missiles at wtc from verifiable and unverifiable locations. one verifiable location
was the woolworth building. the firing of the missiles was to ruffle the entry holes.

(take a look a crash sites http://www.whilimena.blogspot.com/ and notice how planes

crash and crumble. they do not use hacksaw to cut their way through.)

now ask yourself this question: several sources reported the firing of missiles, yet the 9-
11 commission did not call those sources.
several persons reported implosions yet the 9-11 commission did not call them. so what
these ... did during months of review? answer: calling persons who did not think it was
an inside job.
giuliani did not know moussaoui; nor did he privy to details that would make him a
witness. yet he gave evidence at the moussaoui trial.
giuliani setup bioone to clean up scenes affected by anthrax. smelling any stinking rat?

incidentally, two of those alleged commissioners have written a book called 'without
precedent'. how did this come about?

well, people have been complaining that some things are fishy about the 9-11
commission report. therefore, in its quest to rub some more polish on the report, these
commissioners intend to appease the public and sell millions of copies of 'without
precedent'; then retire rich while laughing like parrots.

what is interesting about the 9-11 report and without precedent, is that while the authors
continue to act naive about 'we didn't know' and 'we didn't do' and 'we should have', they
have driven additional nails into the conspirati by admitting that the said commission
knew the faa and the pentagon were giving false data.
now the questions: if you are investigating america's biggest crime and you ascertain that
key players are giving false data. what would you do? why would the faa and pentagon
cover for the vicious terrorist osama bin laden?

back to wtc.

persons 'in the know' have reported that so many agents could not have been on the scene
in new york, if they did not have prior knowledge of the attacks. there were agents like
'rice grains' on the wtc scene - there to prohibit the taking of photographs and access to
certain areas. all the work of the man in charge of the northern command wing of
operation avenging angels (9-11). why angels? certain military sources name certain
planes 'angels'.
rescue workers said that they repeatedly pointed out that wtc 7 was on fire and 9-11
planners merely remarked: 'yes we know!'

one of the most implicating smoking guns was the selling of the forensic material at the
wtc. that was, and is a criminal act.

the burning of the fire for 100 days is another questionable occurrence. whilimena' view!
the fire burned to destroy the incriminating evidence. you see, the faa reported that at
9:21 a.m. flight 11 was still airborne. if it was airborne, it did not crash in the towers and
therefore the bodies allegedly found at wtc would not have been those from flight 11.
you see why the fire had to burn and burn and burn?

next we look at another stupid 'daddy' move. one of the alleged hijacker's passport flew
out of his pocket (like the jfk bullet) and landed safely in manhattan. you the persons
who 'found the passport should have faced the music by now!

ever thought how the wtc scene was labeled 'ground zero'?

one mainstream paper reported that terrorists were down south practicing at a facility
called ground zero. police lamented that the facility (rented by anglosaxons), was used
for target practice. what type of vehicles were used for target practice?
police cars and school buses. 9-11 commissioners never investigate that yet they are
coming now to talk about: 'we should have'.
did they investigate anything really?

then folks, let commonsense reflect! ground zero means 'a nuclear blast site'.

for a thorough review of the 9-11 scam visit: http://www.whilimena.blogspot.com/

please note that there are many pages highlighted (in blue) the upper section of the first
web page.

next: the pentagon scam

next: the shanksville scam
next: the passenger list scam