1here are several dlfferenL and someLlmes qulLe confuslng sLaLemenLs LhaL clalm Lo be a deflnlLlon of knowledge ManagemenL and Lhere are dlfferenL perspecLlves on whaL knowledge ManagemenL ls lor example
r kM ls abouL sysLems and Lechnologles r kM ls abouL people and learnlng organlzaLlons r kM ls abouL processes meLhods and Lechnlques r kM ls abouL managlng knowledge asseLs r kM ls a hollsLlc lnlLlaLlve across Lhe enLlre organlzaLlon r kM ls noL a dlsclpllne as such and should be an lnLegral parL of every knowledge workers dally responslblllLles WhaL ls mosL lmporLanL ls for you Lo have your own deflnlLlon of knowledge ManagemenL whaL kM ls Lo you and your organlzaLlon WhaL ls even more lmporLanL ls LhaL you and your colleagues have a common shared undersLandlng of whaL kM means for you all 1o help you geL sLarLed we have lncluded lmmedlaLely below a few deflnlLlons of whaL kM means Lo some organlzaLlons We suggesL you conslder Lhem LogeLher wlLh any oLher deflnlLlons you may have and see lf Lhere are any words or phrases LhaL parLlcularly resonaLe wlLh whaL you are Lrylng Lo do 1hls wlll help you formulaLe your own deflnlLlon of knowledge managemenL AL Lhe end of Lhls page we lnvlLe you Lo share wlLh us all any deflnlLlons you have dlscovered and/or formulaLed We can Lhen all commenL and raLe Lhe usefulness of each deflnlLlon as we wlsh 1hls Lhen provldes us aL Lhe boLLom of Lhls page wlLh a llsL of kM ueflnlLlons llsLed ln hlghesL raLed/ranked order Lo help us even furLher So please share your deflnlLlons and/or any commenLs or raLlng Lo deflnlLlons Some we|| known kM Def|n|t|ons lf only P knew whaL lL knows lL would make Lhree Llmes more proflL Lomorrow Lew laLL ex CLC PewleLL ackard
knowledge ManagemenL ls Lhe dlsclpllne of enabllng lndlvlduals Leams and enLlre organlsaLlons Lo collecLlvely and sysLemaLlcally creaLe share and apply knowledge Lo beLLer achleve Lhelr ob[ecLlves 8on ?oung CLC/CkC knowledge AssoclaLes lnLernaLlonal | a g e
MosL acLlvlLles or Lasks are noL oneLlme evenLs WheLher lLs drllllng a well or conducLlng a LransacLlon aL a servlce sLaLlon we do Lhe same Lhlngs repeaLedly Cur phllosophy ls falrly slmple every Llme we do someLhlng agaln we should do lL beLLer Lhan Lhe lasL Llme Slr !ohn SLeely 8rowne 8 Parvard 8uslness 8evlew 1997
1he capablllLles by whlch communlLles wlLhln an organlsaLlon capLure Lhe knowledge LhaL ls crlLlcal Lo Lhem consLanLly lmprove lL and make lL avallable ln Lhe mosL effecLlve manner Lo Lhose who need lL so LhaL Lhey can explolL lL creaLlvely Lo add value as a normal parL of Lhelr work ClaxoSmlLhkllne
knowledge managemenL wlll dellver ouLsLandlng collaboraLlon and parLnershlp worklng lL wlll ensure Lhe reglon maxlmlzes Lhe value of lLs lnformaLlon and knowledge asseLs and lL wlll help lLs clLlzens Lo use Lhelr creaLlvlLy and skllls beLLer leadlng Lo lmproved effecLlveness and greaLer lnnovaLlon WesL Mldlands 8eglonal CbservaLory uk
We recognlse LhaL our mosL lmporLanL asseL ls people and Lhelr knowledge We undersLand knowledge ManagemenL (kM) as Lhe culLlvaLlon of an envlronmenL wlLhln whlch people are wllllng Lo share learn and collaboraLe LogeLher leadlng Lo lmprovemenL Care Servlces lmprovemenL arLnershlp (CSl)
knowledge ManagemenL (kM) comprlses a range of pracLlces used by organlsaLlons Lo ldenLlfy creaLe represenL and dlsLrlbuLe knowledge lL has been an esLabllshed dlsclpllne slnce 1993 wlLh a body of unlverslLy courses and boLh professlonal and academlc [ournals dedlcaLed Lo lL Many large companles have resources dedlcaLed Lo knowledge ManagemenL ofLen as a parL of lnformaLlon 1echnology or Puman 8esource ManagemenL deparLmenLs knowledge ManagemenL ls a mulLlbllllon dollar world wlde markeL knowledge ManagemenL programs are Lyplcally Lled Lo organlzaLlonal ob[ecLlves such as lmproved performance compeLlLlve advanLage lnnovaLlon lessons learnL Lransfer (for example beLween pro[ecLs) and Lhe general developmenL of collaboraLlve pracLlces knowledge ManagemenL ls frequenLly llnked Lo Lhe ldea of Lhe learnlng organlzaLlon alLhough nelLher pracLlce encompasses Lhe oLher knowledge ManagemenL may be dlsLlngulshed from CrganlzaLlonal Learnlng by a greaLer focus on speclflc knowledge asseLs and Lhe developmenL and culLlvaLlon of Lhe channels Lhrough whlch knowledge flows Wlklpedla | a g e
ow d|d |t evo|ve?
1he PlsLory Cf knowledge ManagemenL arL l 1he Search for ArLlflclal lnLelllgence 1he flrsL sLage ln Lhe developmenL of knowledge managemenL focused on replaclng human lnLelllgence wlLh arLlflclal lnLelllgence ArLlflclal lnLelllgence had been a sub[ecL for debaLe long before compuLers were avallable hllosophers such as uescarLes debaLed wheLher people could be LhoughL of as machlnes WlLh Lhe advenL of compuLers Lhe debaLe focused on wheLher Lhey could be made Lo Lhlnk An early aLLempL aL an `lnLelllgenL program was made by newell Shaw and Slmon ln Lhe 1930s 1he alm of Lhe work was Lo produce a general problem solver (CS) 1he generallLy of Lhe CS meanL lL was lnefflclenL and superflclal ln lLs analysls 1he lesson from early sysLems such as Lhe CS was Lhe reallzaLlon LhaL Lhe successful encapsulaLlon of knowledge ls mosL easlly aLLalned wlLhln a speclflc and narrow problem domaln 1hls led Lo Lhe concepL of experL sysLems as sysLems whlch model experLlse wlLhln a narrow and speclflc domaln WlLhln such domalns some noLable successes were achleved for example xCCn was used by uLC Lo conflgure compuLers for many years from Lhe 1970s onwards lL ls noLlceable however LhaL Lhe same casesLudles are consLanLly quoLed 1oday Lhere ls sLlll a mysLlque surroundlng Lhe sub[ecL of Al and consequenL confuslon abouL whaL can be achleved ln pracLlce So leLs address Lhese lssues CompuLers do noL Lhlnk for Lhemselves An Al appllcaLlon ls a program llke any oLher lL ls a seL of procedures whlch Lhe compuLer follows wlLh lnpuLs and ouLpuLs Al programs use a symbollc represenLaLlon of Lhe world All compuLer programs are based upon a model of Lhe problem Lhey seek Lo solve ln convenLlonal lnformaLlon sysLems Lhls model ls consLrucLed ln Lerms of numbers ln an Al program Lhe model ls consLrucLed ln Lerms nearer Lo a human vlew uslng symbols such as LexL or plcLures 1he compuLers vlew ls sLlll a model buL ls slmply expressed ln dlfferenL Lerms Machlne lnLelllgence ls noL human lnLelllgence Puman lnLelllgence ls a very broad and varled Lhlng Some of Lhe characLerlsLlcs of lnLelllgenL behavlour are reasonlng deducLlon learnlng and adapLablllLy Machlne lnLelllgence seeks Lo model Lhls behavlour buL ls only able Lo do so ln llmlLed domalns and ln llmlLed areas Many machlne lnLelllgence Lechnlques focus on only one or Lwo aspecLs of human lnLelllgence 1he PlsLory Cf knowledge ManagemenL arL AdapLaLlon Lo SupporL Puman ueclslon Maklng 8ecause of Lhe llmlLaLlons noLed above Lhe Lechnology adapLed Lo supporL human declslon maklng lnsLead of Lrylng Lo replace lL 1hls led Lo Lhe flrsL developmenL of knowledge based declslon supporL sysLems 1hese used rules Lo encapsulaLe knowledge whlch ln Lurn was used Lo supporL human declslon maklng 1hese sysLems had some noLable successes buL suffered from Lhe brlLLleness and narrowness of Lhelr knowledge base 1hey dealL wlLh only llmlLed knowledge domalns and could noL deLermlne when Lhey had exceeded Lhe boundarles of Lhls knowledge base leadlng Lo wlld and lnaccuraLe concluslons
| a g e
1he PlsLory Cf knowledge ManagemenL arL 1he CrowLh of knowledge 8eposlLorles Modern knowledge managemenL has bullL on lLs hlsLory buL lnsLead of bulldlng complex heurlsLlcs on narrow knowledge bases Lhey Lend Lo have slmpler heurlsLlcs applled Lo large knowledge reposlLorles Pere are some of Lhe modern appllcaLlons of Lhls Lype knowledge ManagemenL SysLems for l1 Pelpdesks l1 Pelpdesks have sysLems Lo collecL and record querles from users seeklng supporL 1he sysLem logs Lhe querles and records Lhe responses lrom Lhe responses glven Lhe sysLem bullds a daLabase of answers for Lhe mosL common querles nexL Llme Lhe same query comes ln Lhe answer can be glven sLralghL from Lhe sysLem and evenLually publlshed as a llsL of answers Lo frequenLly asked quesLlons aLlenL SafeLy ueclslon SupporL rescrlblng errors klll an alarmlng number of paLlenLs every year Modern elecLronlc prescrlblng sysLems check prescrlpLlons agalnsL a knowledge base of known drug lnLeracLlons and Lhe oLher prescrlpLlon drugs you may be Laklng 1hey wlll also check dosages Lo ensure Lhey do noL exceed maxlmum safe doses lf lL has access Lo your medlcal record lL can also check agalnsL your personal allergles or oLher facLors whlch mlghL be adversely affecLed by Lhe prescrlbed drugs such as blood pressure or dlabeLes
Character|st|cs
1he challenge of knowledge ManagemenL ls Lo deLermlne whaL lnformaLlon wlLhln an organlzaLlon quallfles as valuableAll lnformaLlon ls noL knowledge and all knowledge ls noL valuable 1he key ls Lo flnd Lhe worLhwhlle knowledge wlLhln a vasL sea of lnformaLlon
1 knowledge ManagemenL ls abouL people lL ls dlrecLly llnked Lo whaL people know and how whaL Lhey know can supporL buslness and organlzaLlonal ob[ecLlves lL draws on human compeLency lnLulLlon ldeas and moLlvaLlons lL ls noL a Lechnologybased concepL AlLhough Lechnology can supporL a knowledge ManagemenL efforL lL shouldn'L begln Lhere
knowledge ManagemenL ls orderly and goaldlrecLed lL ls lnexLrlcably Lled Lo Lhe sLraLeglc ob[ecLlves of Lhe organlzaLlon lL uses only Lhe lnformaLlon LhaL ls Lhe mosL meanlngful pracLlcal and purposeful
knowledge ManagemenL ls everchanglng 1here ls no such Lhlng as an lmmuLable law ln knowledge ManagemenL knowledge ls consLanLly LesLed updaLed revlsed and someLlmes evenobsoleLedwhen lL ls no longer pracLlcable lL ls a fluld ongolng process
3 | a g e
knowledge ManagemenL ls valueadded lL draws upon pooled experLlse relaLlonshlps and alllances CrganlzaLlons can furLher Lhe Lwoway exchange of ldeas by brlnglng ln experLs from Lhe fleld Lo advlse or educaLe managers on recenL Lrends and developmenLs lorums counclls and boards can be lnsLrumenLal ln creaLlng common ground and organlzaLlonal coheslveness
3 knowledge ManagemenL ls vlslonary 1hls vlslon ls expressed ln sLraLeglc buslness Lerms raLher Lhan Lechnlcal Lerms and ln a manner LhaL generaLes enLhuslasm buyln and moLlvaLes managers Lo work LogeLher Loward reachlng common goals
6 knowledge ManagemenL ls complemenLary lL can be lnLegraLed wlLh oLher organlzaLlonal learnlng lnlLlaLlves such as 1oLal CuallLy ManagemenL (1CM) lL ls lmporLanL for knowledge managers Lo show lnLerlm successes along wlLh progress made on more proLracLed efforLs such as mulLlyear sysLems developmenLs lnfrasLrucLure or enLerprlse archlLecLure pro[ecLs
ect|ve of know|edge Management (Create Capture Commun|cate)
O SysLem CreaLlon and malnLenance of CrganlzaLlon wlde knowledge ManagemenL lnfrasLrucLure O Speed 8educe lnformaLlon search Llme wlLh lncreased effecLlveness O CuallLy 1ake varlaLlon ln performance as source of lmprovemenL O CusLomers Lnsure conslsLenL cusLomer experlence across all Louch polnLs uslng knowledge of cusLomer lnLerfaclng sLaff O Lfflclency 8educe Lendencles of relnvenLlon across organlzaLlon
1ypes of know|edge Management
knowledge can be dlvlded lnLo Lwo Lypes LaclL knowledge and expllclL knowledge 1aclL knowledge ls lmpllclL whereas expllclL knowledge ls rulebased knowledge LhaL ls used Lo maLch acLlons Lo slLuaLlons by lnvoklng approprlaLe rules An organlzaLlon promoLes Lhe learnlng of LaclL knowledge Lo lncrease Lhe skllls and creaLlve capaclLles of lLs employees and Lakes advanLage of expllclL knowledge Lo maxlmlze efflclency
6 | a g e
1ac|t know|edge
1aclL knowledge lncludes handson skllls besL pracLlces speclal knowhow and lnLulLlons ersonal knowledge LhaL ls dlfflculL Lo arLlculaLe 1aclL knowledge ln an organlzaLlon ensures Lask effecLlveness lL also provldes for a klnd of creaLlve vlLallLy lnLulLlon and sponLaneous lnslghL can ofLen Lackle Lough problems LhaL would oLherwlse be dlfflculL Lo solve 1radlLlonally Lhe Lransfer of LaclL knowledge ls Lhrough shared experlence Lhrough apprenLlceshlp and [ob Lralnlng 1aclL knowledge ls culLlvaLed ln an organlzaLlonal culLure LhaL moLlvaLes Lhrough shared vlslon and common purpose
Lxp||c|t know|edge
LxpllclL knowledge ls used ln Lhe deslgn of rouLlnes sLandard operaLlon procedures and Lhe sLrucLure of daLa records 1hese forms of knowledge can be found ln any organlzaLlon lL allows an organlzaLlon Lo en[oy a cerLaln level of operaLlonal efflclency and conLrol LxpllclL knowledge promoLes equable conslsLenL organlzaLlonal responses
An organlzaLlon musL adopL a hollsLlc approach Lo knowledge managemenL LhaL successfully comblnes 1aclL and expllclL knowledge aL all levels of Lhe organlzaLlon ersonal knowledge ls leveraged wlLh expllclL knowledge for Lhe deslgn and developmenL of lnnovaLlve producLs servlces and processes
kesearch
kM emerged as a sclenLlflc dlsclpllne ln Lhe earller 1990s lL was lnlLlally supporLed solely by pracLlLloners when Scandla hlred Lelf Ldvlnsson of Sweden as Lhe world's flrsL Chlef knowledge Cfflcer (CkC) PuberL SalnLCnge (formerly of Cl8C Canada) sLarLed lnvesLlgaLlng varlous sldes of kM long before LhaL 1he ob[ecLlve of CkCs ls Lo manage and maxlmlze Lhe lnLanglble asseLs of Lhelr organlzaLlons Cradually CkCs became lnLeresLed ln noL only pracLlcal buL also LheoreLlcal aspecLs of kM and Lhe new research fleld was formed 1he kM ldeas Laken up by academlcs such as lku[lro nonaka (PlLoLsubashl unlverslLy) PlroLaka 1akeuchl (PlLoLsubashl unlverslLy) 1homas P uavenporL (8abson College) and 8aruch Lev (new ?ork unlverslLy) ln 001 1homas A SLewarL former edlLor aL lC81unL Magazlne and subsequenLly Lhe edlLor of 7 | a g e
Parvard 8uslness 8evlew publlshed a cover sLory hlghllghLlng Lhe lmporLance of lnLellecLual caplLal of organlzaLlons Slnce lLs esLabllshmenL Lhe kM dlsclpllne has been gradually movlng Lowards academlc maLurlLy llrsL Lhere ls a Lrend Lowards hlgher cooperaLlon among academlcs parLlcularly Lhere has been a drop ln slngleauLhored publlcaLlons Second Lhe role of pracLlLloners has changed 1helr conLrlbuLlon Lo academlc research has been dramaLlcally decllnlng from 0 of overall conLrlbuLlons up Lo 00 Lo only 10 by 009 (Serenko eL al 010)
A broad range of LhoughLs on Lhe kM dlsclpllne exlsLs wlLh no unanlmous agreemenL approaches vary by auLhor and school As Lhe dlsclpllne maLures academlc debaLes have lncreased regardlng boLh Lhe Lheory and pracLlce of kM Lo lnclude Lhe followlng perspecLlves 1echnocenLrlc wlLh a focus on Lechnology ldeally Lhose LhaL enhance knowledge sharlng and creaLlon CrganlzaLlonal wlLh a focus on how an organlzaLlon can be deslgned Lo faclllLaLe knowledge processes besL Lcologlcal wlLh a focus on Lhe lnLeracLlon of people ldenLlLy knowledge and envlronmenLal facLors as a complex adapLlve sysLem akln Lo a naLural ecosysLem
8egardless of Lhe school of LhoughL core componenLs of kM lnclude eople rocesses 1echnology (or) CulLure SLrucLure 1echnology dependlng on Lhe speclflc perspecLlve (Spender Scherer 007) ulfferenL kM schools of LhoughL lnclude varlous lenses Lhrough whlch kM can be vlewed and explalned Lo lnclude O communlLy of pracLlce (Wenger McuermoLL Synder 001) O soclal neLwork analysls O lnLellecLual caplLal (8onLls Choo 00) O lnformaLlon Lheory (Mclnerney 00) O complexlLy sclence O consLrucLlvlsm (nan[appa CranL 00)
1he pracLlcal relevance of academlc research ln kM has been quesLloned (lerguson 003) wlLh acLlon research suggesLed as havlng more relevance (Andrlessen 00) and Lhe need Lo LranslaLe Lhe flndlngs presenLed ln academlc [ournals Lo a pracLlce (8ooker 8onLls Serenko 008)
8 | a g e
1echn|ques to Manage know|edge
We belleve LhaL Lhe knowledge modellng Lechnlques LhaL exlsL Lo supporL Lhe use of Lhe knowledge along wlLh LradlLlonal buslness managemenL Lechnlques provlde a sLarLlng polnL Lo manage Lhe knowledge asseLs wlLhln a company 1herefore Lhe Lechnlques we employ for managlng knowledge wlLhln Lhe organlzaLlon are drawn from Lhese Lwo dlsLlncL areas O Lhe Lechnlques LhaL have been used prevlously from buslness managemenL for example SWC1 (SLrengLhs Weaknesses CpporLunlLles 1hreaLs) analysls balanced scorecards (kaplan 8oberL S norLon uavld (1996)) modellng languages such as luLl (rocess llow and Cb[ecL SLaLe uescrlpLlon CapLure MeLhod Mayer 8 Culllnane 1 de WlLLe knappernberger W erakaLh 8 Wells S (199)) and 8Aus (8ole AcLlvlLy ulagrams Culd M (199)) O Lhe knowledge Lechnlques LhaL have been used prevlously for Lhe dlsclpllned developmenL of knowledgebased appllcaLlons (8enus 8 (199) and Schrelber A 1 Akkermans ! M An[ewlerden A A ue Poog 8 van ue velde W Wlellnga 8 ! (1998))
Cur recommended approach ls a mulLlperspecLlve modellng approach Several models need Lo be developed each of whlch represenLs a dlfferenL perspecLlve on Lhe organlzaLlon whlch can be characLerlzed as Pow WhaL Who Where When and Why" Pow Lhe organlzaLlon carrles ouL lLs buslness modellng Lhe buslness processes O WhaL Lhe processes manlpulaLe modellng Lhe resources O Who carrles ouL Lhe processes modellng capablllLles roles and auLhorlLy O Where a process ls carrled ouL modellng of Lhe communlcaLlon beLween agenLs O When a process ls carrled ouL Lhls speclfles Lhe conLrol over processes
What Are 1he 8enef|ts f know|edge Management?
llrsL of all we say lmaglne knowledge as a fuel and energy source for your buslness a power source lmaglne Lhe use of oLher power sources such as elecLrlclLy or gasollne WhaL are Lhe uses? WhaL are Lhe poLenLlal 8eneflLs ? 1he llsL of posslble beneflLs ls endless ?ou can producLlvely use oll and elecLrlclLy for all sorLs of pracLlcal commonsense Lhlngs So Loo wlLh knowledge lnLellecLual CaplLal and lnLanglble AsseLs 1hey can be used producLlvely and proflLably by your buslness ln myrlad ways We have barely begun Lo scraLch Lhe surface of posslble ways Lo harness knowledgeenergy 1he aLLracLlve lncenLlve Lo Lhe lnLelllgenL buslness person ls LhaL Lhose who can flgure ouL Lo leverage Lhls asseL ln new and creaLlve ways can galn a serlous susLalnable compeLlLlve edge ln Lhe markeLplace 1hen Lhere are conLemporary pro[ecLs such as Lhe Puman Cenome ro[ecL ln effecL Lhls ls a blg global knowledgemapplng exerclse Lo map all Lhe genes ln Lhe human 9 | a g e
body Clearly lL ls golng Lo unleash a knowledgebased revoluLlon of exLraordlnary magnlLude and lmporLance lL wlll have a Lremendous lmpacL on Lhe llfe sclences medlclne bloLechnology pharmacology and so on So how can knowledge be beneflclal? Any number of posslble ways
Pere Lhen are some ldeas Lo Lhlnk abouL 1 Ceneral 8eneflLs Cf knowledge lL sure beaLs lgnorance LxcepL ln rare clrcumsLances Lhere ls noLhlng Lo celebraLe abouL lacklng Lhe approprlaLe knowledge and belng dumb! Ask ?ourself 1hese 1elllng CuesLlons 1 WhaL luel Are ?ou 8unnlng your 8uslness Cn? WhaLs Are Lhe maln lnpuLs fuellng Lhe growLh and developmenL of your buslness? Are you CperaLlng An lndusLrlalAge 8uslness or A osLlndusLrlal Age and knowledge8ased 8uslness? 1here are 1lmeless lundamenLals whlch wonL change 1 know whaL you do know know whaL you need Lo know know whaL you donL know know where you wanL Lo go Ask yourself Lhen wheLher ln relaLlon Lo your buslness you are clear on Lhese knowledge fundamenLals 1he Many osslble 8eneflLs Cf knowledge lor 1he LnLerprlse O roduce and conserve new value such as lnLellecLual roperLy AsseLs O CeneraLe new WealLh and lncreaslng reLurns O lncrease 8evenue O Cpen new MarkeLs O Lnable SusLalnable Crganlc CrowLh O lmprove ueclslonMaklng O MlLlgaLe 8lsk O uevelop and lmplemenL new 8uslness Models O 8ulld More rofound relaLlonshlps and ongolng MlndShare wlLh CusLomers peneLraLe Lhe mlnd of Lhe cusLomer O LlfL roducLlvlLy and Lfflclency O Speed lnnovaLlon O unleash new ldeas and CreaLlvlLy O Pelp creaLe a more AdapLlve responslve dynamlc flexlble organlzaLlon O laclllLaLe Lhe evoluLlon of a more lnLelllgenL LnLerprlse and produce smarL engaglng producLs 10 | a g e
O use knowledge 1o 8ulld vlrLual neLworked 8uslnesses O 8eLLer prepare for and anLlclpaLe 1he luLure O lmprove and acceleraLe Learnlng O CaLher superlor 8uslness and CompeLlLlve lnLelllgence O Lnhance 1eam CollaboraLlon CoordlnaLlon O Maxlmlze Lhe organlzaLlons use of avallable collecLlve wlsdom experlence and Lhe 8ralnower of human caplLal asseLs O lmprove Lhe llow of knowledge O lmprove Lhe Servlce and SupporL of CusLomers O ShlfL employees from balancesheeL expense lLems Lo knowledge lnvesLors ln Lhe enLerprlse O lmprove Lhe ablllLy of Lhe organlzaLlon Lo Manage Change O ALLracL and reLaln moLlvaLed loyal and commlLLed 1alenL O lnLroduce a more relevanL measuremenL uashboard and lnsLrumenL panel wlLh knowledgebased meLrlcs versus mere lndusLrlal age measures O 8e beLLer poslLloned for knowledge Workers Lo cope wlLh lncreaslng lnfogluL and lnformaLlon Cverload O 1urn rocess knowPow lnLo a valuable CorporaLe asseL knowledge Converslon O Pelp Lhe enLerprlse Lo grow more neLwork ConnecLlons more knowledge nodes ( Lhe value of a neLwork ls relaLed Lo Lhe exLenL of Lhe nodes ln lL ) O Lower CperaLlng CosLs by subsLlLuLlng lnformaLlon and knowledge sLores for lnvenLory O Avold WasLe and uupllcaLlon by encouraglng knowledge 8euse O CreaLe a more knowledge aware knowledge frlendly culLure and CommunlLy of racLlce(s) beLLer sulLed Lo Lhe emerglng knowledgebased economy conLexL O Allow more leveraglng of knowledge asseLs Lhrough knowledge ArblLrage sLraLegles O Pave beLLer knowledge 1ransfer occur ln Lhe execuLlon of pro[ecLs O LxLend Lhe global 8each 8lchness and Scope of Lhe enLerprlse O lL can be a Lremendous Lnabler allowlng Lhe organlzaLlon and knowledge workers Lo share ldeas and collaboraLe ln ways LhaL would noL have been posslble prevlously O 8rlng a new level of sophlsLlcaLlon Lo managlng Lhe brand repuLaLlon and lnLanglbles LhaL cusLomers value O ln general be beLLer able Lo CreaLe CapLure Share roLecL ulssemlnaLe ackage and LxplolL knowledge lnLellecLual caplLal and lnLanglbles
What are the ||m|tat|ons
O lnablllLy Lo dellver Lhe expecLed performance ouLcomes O usablllLy Some users are noL capable enough Lo use auLomaLed Lools Lo geL requlred lnformaLlon
11 | a g e
Conc|us|on
1he declslon on wheLher or noL an organlzaLlon should ouLsource a parL of Lhelr buslness ls a compllcaLed one and should noL be Laken llghLly Searchlng for shorLLerm cosL savlngs ls noL a bad ldea buL chooslng ouLsourclng based solely on cosL reducLlon or LacLlcal problems ls a shorLLerm soluLlon and wlll undermlne a companys poLenLlal for long Lerm success 1he organlzaLlon should have sufflclenL managemenL skllls and Lhe ablllLy Lo adapL new behavlors and processes Lo successfully manage an exLernal parL of Lhelr buslness 1hese skllls should lnclude knowledge managemenL ablllLles and a wllllngness Lo apply Lhem Lo a new and more challenglng slLuaLlon 1aclL knowledge musL speclflcally be consldered when plannlng an ouLsourclng sLraLegy parLlcularly lf Lhe componenL of Lhe buslness Lo be ouLsourced already exlsLs lnLernally and valuable lnsLlLuLlonal knowledge wlll be losL 1he Lransfer of LaclL knowledge can have a profound effecL on quallLy and overall sLraLeglc buslness value CulLural and language barrlers add challenges Lo Lhe already dlfflculL process of Lransferrlng LaclL knowledge and are of parLlcular concern ln cases of crossborder ouLsourclng llnally once a declslon has been made Lo ouLsource aspecLs of a buslness speclflc knowledge managemenL sLraLegles can be lmplemenLed LhaL wlll maxlmlze Lhe beneflLs LhaL are avallable from a decenLrallzed buslness model