Ranchview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

C-FBISD VISION:
All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.
Ranchview High School CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District Principal: David Hicks
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Nancy Cline, President James Goode, Vice President Richard Fleming, Secretary Lynn Chaffin, Assistant Secretary Frank Shor, Board Member Nancy Watten, Board Member Karin Webb, Board Member
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
C-FBISD GOAL The Goal of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD is high achievement for all students.
SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES
Supporting Objective 1:
Continuously increase student achievement
CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH SCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Creekview Early College Newman Smith R. L. Turner Ranchview
Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
MIDDLE SCHOOLS Blalack Bush Field Long Perry Polk
Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Blair Blanton Carrollton Central Country Place Davis Farmers Branch Freeman Furneaux Good Kent Landry Las Colinas La Villita McCoy McKamy McLaughlin McWhorter Rainwater Riverchase Rosemeade Sheffield Intermediate Sheffield Primary Stark Strickland Thompson CENTERS
Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Mary Grimes Education Center Salazar Transition School Kelly Pre-K Center Huie Education Center CLC Learning Complex
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES
BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES
STAFF REPRESENTATIVES Sonia Bustamante Chris Cogswell Stephanie Perkins Chris Wilkins Heather Davis Galen Cook Dee Boyd Marianne Paredes Laura Fisher
PARENT REPRESENTATIVES
ADMINISTRATORS David Hicks Melanie Magee Timothy Isaly Donna McMurrey

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW : Chair Signature Sept 29, 2011 Date
Chair Signature
Date
Chair Signature
Date
Chair Signature
Date
C-FBISD VISION
All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.
GRADUATE PROFILE
Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:
MISSION
Together with families and community we commit all district resources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as: A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator
Responsible individuals who:

Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members
Competent learners who:

Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products
STATEMENT OF BELIEFS
We believe that: The economic, political and societal success of our country depends upon a quality education for all. Diversity strengthens the community and enriches the fabric of our society. It is the responsibility of the entire community to partner in the educational process. Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturing environment. Belonging to a family, to a school and to a community is vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning. People learn at different rates, have different capacities and that each persons educational path deserves to be valued equally. Learning empowers people to reach their full potential: physically, mentally, socially, and emotionally Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.
Complex thinkers who:

Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking
Effective communicators who:

Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly
TARGET AREAS
Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. TA 2. TA 3. TA 4. TA 5. TA 6. TA 7. TA 8. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs Highly qualified teachers Professional Development Increase parental involvement Coordination of federal, state, and local services
Title I School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments. TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.
THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF Performance Targets: Employee Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction Student: Attendance Rate Disciplinary Placements SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM Performance Targets: Education Productivity Index (EPI) API SPI Parent Satisfaction Employee Campus Communications
Performance Targets: Academic Performance Index (API) STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced Graduation Rate SAT Mean ACT Mean Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations AYP
Performance Targets: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS
THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS
SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM
Supporting Objective 1
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP
ACTION STRATEGY
Use the SMART Goal and Instructional Improvement Process to target instruction to address the lowest TEKS performance objectives.
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
David Hicks Instructional Facilitators David Hicks, Melanie Magee, Timothy Isaly, Donna McMurrey, Instructional Facilitators, Department Managers, Teachers Donna McMurrey, Instructional Facilitators, Department Managers, Teachers Donna McMurrey, Timothy Isaly David Hicks, Instructional Facilitators David Hicks, instructional Facilitators Kelly OSullivan Leslie Yager Brenda Briley ELA Teachers Teachers
TIMELINE
Each 6 Weeks
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
Data Charts Grade Level PD Discussions
RESOURCES
Campus Budget
TITLE I COMPONENT
Identify 2010-2011 TAKS failures and 2011-2012 Unit Test failures for targeted intervention
Each 3 Weeks
TAKS Data Edugence Unit Test Data Analysis Progress Monitoring Charts
Campus Budget
Implement an Accelerated Tutorial Plan for Ninth Grade SSI Students Design and implement a school-wide data monitoring process using unit test results, honor rolls, attendance data, discipline data, and course success data Utilize Instructional Specialists and coaches to effectively implement curriculum Implement an instructional planning and monitoring process that includes the intentional selection of research based educational pedagogy that causes increased engagement, critical thinking, Quality Questions, and data collection through use of Instructional Rounds Implement building-wide programs reinforcing reading: DEAR, Readers/Writers Workshop, IPad technology
Each 3 Weeks
Unit Test Data Analysis Teacher Developed Assessments Unit Test Data Analysis Honor rolls Referral Data Attendance Data STAAR District and Unit Assessments PD Topics/Discussions Lesson Plans Instructional Rounds Data Teacher Leader Walk Through Data Library Circulation ELA Benchmarks ELA TAKS and EOC Scores
Campus Budget
Each 9 Weeks
Campus Budget Comp Ed Budget $195,149
August-May
Monthly August-June
Campus Budget
Daily/Weekly
Campus Budget
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations
ACTION STRATEGY
Attend IB MYP and DP Training and Implement IB Pedagogy
PERSON RESPONSIBLE Sharon Kotarski Teachers David Hicks, Karen Wilson, Dads Club Volunteers Instructional Facilitators Teachers Teachers
TIMELINE
Annually
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
Lesson Plans, Classroom Observations
RESOURCES IB Budget Campus Budget Ranch Hands Donations Campus Budget Campus Budget
TITLE I COMPONENT
Monitor student passing rates and recognize academic successes each nine weeks and twice each semester with ceremonies and an Effort Produces Achievement Cookout Attend professional development sessions on STAAR/EOC testing program Add additional open response and critical thinking questions to unit assessments for advanced classes Develop a series of activities that reinforce high quality effort and increased motivation with advanced students panel discussions and presentations from former students to encourage increased effort
Each Nine Weeks
Grade Distribution Reports, Honor Rolls, Effort Produces Achievement Rolls PD Discussions Unit Test Data Analysis Unit Test Data Analysis Graduate panel discussions, electronic forums, displays of graduates and their work/quotes, displays of RHS vs other schools progress
Each Nine Weeks Each Unit
Donna McMurrey, Sharon Kotarski, Karen Wilson
Monthly
Campus Budget
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY
Identify potential early or non-graduates, grade changers, Exit level TAKS failures and cohort 98s for early intervention Establish grade level meetings to review progress, honor student achievements and support struggling students
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
Melanie Magee Graduation Team Donna McMurrey Timothy Isaly Grade Level Teachers
TIMELINE
Each 3 Weeks
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
TAKS Data, Progress Tracking Charts, Graduation/Continuation Rate Team Discussions Grade Improvements
RESOURCES
Campus Budget
TITLE I COMPONENT
Each 9 weeks
Campus Budget
Design and implement credit recovery programs
Melanie Magee,
Each Semester
Monitor student
Campus Budget
through the PLATO Lab
Souella Music
progress each six weeks and at graduation team meetings
Accelerated Education Funding 100%
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean

ACTION STRATEGY Target Students for PSAT/SAT/ACT Preparation Programs; Review Scores with Teachers, Students, Parents PERSON RESPONSIBLE David Hicks Melanie Magee Dawn Thompson Teachers TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE Mean PSAT, SAT, ACT Scores Participation Rates RESOURCES Campus Budget, PSAT Boot Camp, College Board, Revolution Prep TITLE I COMPONENT
August, October, January, May
Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.
ACTION STRATEGY PERSON RESPONSIBLE Teacher Leaders Teachers Heather Davis Wendy Bartlett Liz Mahaffey David Hicks Teacher Leaders Heather Davis Wendy Bartlett Liz Mahaffey David Hicks Teacher Leaders TIMELINE Monthly Monthly EVALUATION/ MEASURE Review the norms and determine actions in PD Monthly Survey RESOURCES Campus Budget Campus Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
Mindset and key instructional initiatives
Establish department norms emphasizing FISH!, Build community within the faculty by planning monthly teambuilding events Establish staff recognition programs for colleagues to honor each other for their efforts: This Buds For You, Faculty Meeting Raffles, Apaws Cards, Super Staff of the Week Preserve time for instructional planning as part of the Instructional Improvement Process in PD
Monthly
Monthly Survey Wolfpack Weekly PD Calendar
Campus Budget Donations Campus Budget
Weekly
Performance Target: Employee: Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.
ACTION STRATEGY Establish a system for prioritization of effort to focus on actions that produce results (stop doing and start doing reviews) PERSON RESPONSIBLE David Hicks Melanie Magee Timothy Isaly Donna McMurrey TIMELINE Each 6 Weeks EVALUATION/ MEASURE Data collected and shared in PD Monthly Survey RESOURCES Campus Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
Performance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction Teachers work amicably together on common problems.
ACTION STRATEGY Reinforce the existing culture of PLCs by implementing Instructional Rounds: Determine a Problem of Practice and a Theory of Change and then collect data is a systematic manner throughout the year. Utilize district-level content facilitators and coordinators to deepen our understanding of content, EOC requirements and effective instructional strategies PERSON RESPONSIBLE David Hicks Teacher Leaders Teachers David Hicks Melanie Magee Content Specialists TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE Data collected and shared in PD RESOURCES Campus Budget $3000.00 TITLE I COMPONENT
Each 6 weeks
Monthly
PD Discussions
Campus Budget
Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

ACTION STRATEGY Monitor student attendance rates and target students for interventions ranging from parent conferences-attendance make up-truancy referrals PERSON RESPONSIBLE Donna McMurrey, Jan Young, Tamara Johnson, Teachers TIMELINE Each 3 Weeks EVALUATION/ MEASURE Attendance Reports RESOURCES Campus Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
10
Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

ACTION STRATEGY Implement a comprehensive advisory program to address norms for acceptable behavior including anti drug use and teen violence, social support programs, goal setting/effort reinforcement Create a Portrait of a Wolf to emphasize the importance of effort and high standards PERSON RESPONSIBLE Karen Wilson, Tamara Johnson Timothy Isaly Wolf Nation, Student Exec, and Student Council organizations TIMELINE Each 9 Weeks EVALUATION/ MEASURE RAP Notes Portrait Decreased office referrals Increased academic performance RESOURCES Campus Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
August -January
Campus Budget
Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

ACTION STRATEGY Closely monitor the master schedule to verify teachers are assigned to teaching fields in which they are highly qualified. Recruit and retain the most successful instructors for our IB instructional program PERSON RESPONSIBLE David Hicks David Hicks, Sharon Kotarski, Instructional Facilitators, Department TIMELINE April-August EVALUATION/ MEASURE Master Schedule RESOURCES Campus Budget IB Budget, Campus Budget, Job Fairs, IB and International TITLE I COMPONENT
April-August
Staff Hiring Trends
11
Managers
Publications, Professional Organization Websites August-May Monthly August-June Energy Consumption Charts Recycling Weights Overtime Reports Campus Budget TEAMS District Budget
Implement a Watt Watchers Energy Conservation Program and a Recycling Program Monitor the use of overtime and decrease its use
Timothy Isaly Jenny Schero /Eco Club Ashley Norris David Hicks
Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY Examine campus staffing efficiency and make staffing recommendations PERSON RESPONSIBLE David Hicks TIMELINE January-March EVALUATION/ MEASURE Staffing Costs RESOURCES District Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together

ACTION STRATEGY Develop schoolwide system to prepare students for post graduation success Organize PTSA to focus on initiating new traditionsand recognition programs, teacher appreciation activities, parent programs, studentled service projects, and Post-Prom Hold monthly parent meetings for informal conversation and communication PERSON RESPONSIBLE Dawn Thompson Karen Wilson Melanie Magee David Hicks, PTSA Board David Hicks TIMELINE August-June EVALUATION/ MEASURE Parent Participation Totals Student Post-Graduation Reports PTSA Meeting Minutes Meeting Sign In Sheets RESOURCES Campus Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
August-June Monthly - August-June
PTSA Budget Campus Budget
12
Host 2 parent conferences to review our school goals/progress, student goals/progress, TAKS scores and transcripts, and to improve opportunities for direct communication with stakeholders. Increase student participation and successes in academic contests: UIL, Reflections, RHS Art Show, VASE, Math Contests, Academic Decathlon, Speech/Debate
David Hicks Department Managers Teachers Melanie Magee, Kelly OSullivan, Department Managers, Academic Coaches, Fine Arts Teachers
August and January
Parent Comment Cards
Campus Budget
September-May
Awards Earned
Campus Budget
Performance Target: Employee: Campus Communication School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest
ACTION STRATEGY Establish a system of two way communication that keeps team members informed and provides an avenue for norm driven, solution oriented problem solving. PERSON RESPONSIBLE David Hicks Teacher Leaders Teachers TIMELINE Weekly/Monthly August-May
Wolfpack Weekly
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
RESOURCES
TITLE I COMPONENT
Newsletter, Advance Meeting Agendas, Monthly Survey
13
ERG Performance Index Education Productivity Index (EPI) Academic Performance Index (API) Staff Productivity Index (SPI)
2010 Rank 52 117 33
2011 Target 40 75 30
2011 Rank
2012 Target 25 50 25
2012 Rank
Employee Opinion Survey Employee Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work. Employee Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.
2011 Result 68% 51% 89% 72%
2012 Target 100% 100% 100% 100%
2012 Result
on common problems.
Employee Curriculum and Instruction Support Teachers work amicably together Employee Campus Communication
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met
2012 Result
School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest.

AEIS Campus Rating Student Attendance Rate Students with Disciplinary Placements Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District
2011 Result A 95.6
2012 Target A 96
Percent at Target
2011 Result 80%
2012 Target 85%
2012 Result
14
TAKS
READING/ELA 2011
% PASS

READING/ELA
2012
% SATIS Target Result
MATHEMATICS
2012 % ADV Target 20 30 50 20 3 75 5 35 Result
2011
% COM
MATHEMATICS
2011
% PASS
2012
2011
% COM
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. LEP G/T Special Ed All Students
Student Group
92 92 96 91 59 100 85 94
95 95 98 95 85 100 90 95
13 21 39 13 0 64 2 24
70 84 89 74 65 100 60 83
85 90 95 85 85 100 85 90
8 18 36 11 18 77 4 26
EOC
WRITING 2011
% PASS
WRITING
2012
SCIENCE
2011
% COM
SCIENCE
2011
% PASS
2012
2011
% COM
Student Group
Student Group
85 85 85 85 85 90 85 85
74 83 94 76 67 100 61 84
85 90 95 85 85 100 85 90
6 17 51 8 8 69 0 25
SOCIAL STUDIES
SOCIAL STUDIES 2011
% PASS
2012
2011
% COM
Student Group
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target SATISFACTORY ADVANCED
96 97 100 97 100 100 88 98
100 100 100 100 100 100 95 98
48 56 69 47 17 99 6 61
15
C-FBISD
Completion Rate

COMPLETION RATE
Class of 2009
Comp Rate # of Dropouts
Class of 2010
Comp Rate # of Dropouts
Class of 2011
Comp Rate Target Results Target 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dropouts Results
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. G/T Special Ed All Students
91.9 86.2 92.3 84.1 88.2 92.7
1 1 2
.3 4
100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Dropout Rate
C-FBISD 2008-2009
Rate 1.5 2.1 .5 1.6 2.6 1.3
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE

2009-2010
Rate Target 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
2010-2011
Results
C-FBISD
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Met AYP 2008 2009 2010 2011 Target 2012 Results 2012 Y Y Y Y Y
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. G/T Special Ed All Students
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS Completion # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target
Dropout
16
C-FBISD
Subtests
Critical Reading Mathematics Writing Combined Score Percent Tested 2009
500 526 488 1514 63
SAT MEAN SCORES

2010
449 482 456 1387 64
2011
475 492 476 1443 77
2012 Target 500 500 500 1500 85 Results
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS SAT # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target
ACT
C-FBISD
Subtests
English Mathematics Reading Science Composite Percent Tested 2009
21 22 23 21 22 26 20 22 20 21 21 39
ACT MEAN SCORES

2010 2011
20 22 21 21 21 28 2012 Target 22 24 23 22 23 35 Results
17

Ranchview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Ranchview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

C-FBISD VISION:

Ranchview High School CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District Principal: David Hicks

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH SCHOOLS

Continuously increase operational effectiveness

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

ADMINISTRATORS David Hicks Melanie Magee Timothy Isaly Donna McMurrey

Responsible individuals who:

Competent learners who:

Complex thinkers who:

Effective communicators who:

Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Title I School-wide Components (TS)

Performance Targets: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Budget Comp Ed Budget $195,149

Continuously increase student achievement

Each Nine Weeks

Each Nine Weeks Each Unit

Donna McMurrey, Sharon Kotarski, Karen Wilson

Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

Design and implement credit recovery programs

through the PLATO Lab

progress each six weeks and at graduation team meetings

Accelerated Education Funding 100%

Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean

August, October, January, May

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Mindset and key instructional initiatives

Monthly Survey Wolfpack Weekly PD Calendar

Campus Budget Donations Campus Budget

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

Staff Hiring Trends

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together

August-June Monthly - August-June

PTSA Budget Campus Budget

August and January

Parent Comment Cards

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Newsletter, Advance Meeting Agendas, Monthly Survey

2010 Rank 52 117 33

2011 Result 68% 51% 89% 72%

2012 Target 100% 100% 100% 100%

School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest.

2011 Result A 95.6

2011 Result 80%

2012 Target 85%

Continuously increase student achievement

2012 % ADV Target 15 25 45 15 20 85 10 40 Result

2012 % ADV Target 15 25 60 15 10 80 5 35 Result