In the rst lecture of the second part of this course we move more to consider properties of elds. We introduce three eld operators which reveal interesting collective eld properties, viz.
59
&$" 2 )4 2 )1 7 8) 6 ( ( 5 ( ( 30 ( ( '%#!
7 ( ( ) 6 2 ( ( ) 4 2 ( ( )1 9
the gradient of a scalar eld, the divergence of a vector eld, and the curl of a vector eld.
The mechanics of taking the grad, div or curl, for which you will need to brush up your multivariate calculus. The underlying physical meaning that is, why they are worth bothering about.
2 2
( $ 0
#
1 (
9
7 ) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1 2 2 )6 ( ( ) ( ) ( 9 254 2 1 ( ( 2 2 ( (
7 )1
) 6 ( (
2 5) 4 ( 3)1 ( 2
9
1.
Note immediately that is a vector eld! Without thinking too carefully about it, we can see that the gradient of a scalar eld tends to point in the direction of greatest change of the eld. Later we will be more precise.
7 9
Then
60
4.
3.
2.
4) 6 (( 2 ) 4 (( 7
.
9@ 80% 7 0% # # 7 &% ) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1 &% 9 6' 5 2 2 $ 0 ' 0% ( ( 2 )1 ( &% ) 6 # ( 2 ) 4 # ( 2 )1 # ( 9 # 0% ( ( 0% ( ( 2% ( &#% 8# (( ( 3#% # ( (( &#% # (( %' 0()(&#% #( 1
, so exists. As
But
, where is constant.
also,
61
But remember that , so is a unit vector in the direction of . This result can be paraphrased as: has the property that the rate of change of wrt distance in a particular direction ( ) is the projection of onto that direction (or the component of in that direction). The quantity is called a directional derivative, but note that in general it has a different value for each direction, and so has no meaning until you specify the direction. We could also say that
,
&$" '%#!
PSfrag replacements
grad
7 % 9 % ) 6 2 % ) 4 2 % )1 % 7 % ( ( 2 % ( ( 2 % ( (
% )'
% %
%
7
% % 9 %
% )'
%
&$" '%#!
% %
62
At any point P, points in the direction of greatest change of at P, and has magnitude equal to the rate of change of wrt distance in that direction.
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0 4 2 0 0 2 4 4 2 2 4
If we move a tiny amount within that iso. So for any in the surface
But
Surface of constant U
is a tangent to the surface, so this result shows that is everywhere NORMAL to a surface of constant
gradU
&$" '%#!
, so
63
We can write this in a simplied notation using a scalar product with the differential operator:
The terms in
Consider a typical vector eld, water ow, and denote it by . This vector has magnitude equal to the mass of water crossing a unit area perpendicular to the direction of per unit time. Now take an innitesimal volume element and gure out the balance of the ow of in and out of .
('&$ % # ! ! 2 2 ! ! ' & 7 !" ' ! 7 2 2 2 ! 2 2 7 ! 2 2 7 ( ( ('( ! 5 2 2 @ 7 ! 6' ) '
, for constant
, and we need to nd
'
1) 2) 3) 4)
) 6 ! 2 ) 4 )1 2
of it.
) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1 ! 1)
9
) 0%
((
6) 2 ( ( ) 4 2 ( ( )1
( ( ( ! ( 2 ( 2 ( &
) 0%
%
&
vector
64
To be specic, consider the volume element in Cartesian co-ordinates, and think rst about the face of area perpendicular to the axis and facing outwards in the negative direction. (That is, the one with surface area .)
dz dS = -dxdz j dS = +dxdz j y dx dy x
Figure 5.2: Elemental volume for calculating divergence.
The component of the vector normal to this face is , and is pointing inwards, and so the its contribution to the OUTWARD ux from this surface is
where means that is a function of . (By the way, ux here denotes mass per unit time.) A similar contribution, but of opposite sign, will arise from the opposite face, but we must remember that we have moved along by an amount , so that this OUTWARD amount is
So we see that
)4 %
%
3%
) 4
%%
) 0% % %
%
)% 0
% % ( (
9
% %
) 0% ( (
) 0% ( (
% % % 2
2
% % % ( (
( (
%
( (
The divergence of a vector eld represents the ux generation per unit volume at each point of the eld. (Divergence because it is an efux not an inux.) Interestingly we also saw that the total efux from the innitesimal volume was equal to the ux integrated over the surface of the volume. (NB: The above does not constitute a rigorous proof of the assertion because we have not proved that the quantity calculated is independent of the co-ordinate system used, but it will sufce for our purposes.)
Recall that of any scalar eld is a vector eld. Recall also that we can compute the divergence of any vector eld. So we can certainly compute , even if we dont know what it means yet. Here is where the operator starts to be really handy.
This last expression occurs frequently in engineering science (you will meet it next in solving Laplaces Equation in partial differential equations). For this reason, the operator is called the Laplacian
(( ((
6) 2 ( ( 6) 2 ( (
)4 2 ( ( )4 2 (
)1 ( ) ( 6 )1 ( (
(( 2 (( (( 2 (( 2 ( )4 2 ( 6) 2 ( ( ) 4
!
5.5
The Laplacian:
$ ('% $
OF A SCALAR FIELD
65
of a scalar eld
(( 2 (( 2 ((
2 ( ( 2 ( ( ( )1 ( 2 ( )
9
&$" '%#!
"
9
" "
)6
( ( ( ( ) ( ( ) ( ( 2 4 ( ( 2 1 ( ( &" "
! $
) 6 ) 4 ) 1
9 9
2
' ! 5 2 2 @ !
"
evaluation
"
66
Examples of
1) 2) 3)
' 2
So far we have seen the operator applied to a scalar eld vector eld . We are now overwhelmed by an irrestible temptation to
9 9
2 2 (( (( 2 2 0 '
Lets prove example (3) (which is particularly signicant can you guess why?).
"
67
y y+dy ax (y+dy)
ay (x)
dy dx x ax (y)
x+dx
(b)
The circulation of a vector round any closed curve is dened to be and the curl of the vector eld represents the vorticity, or circulation per unit area, of the eld.
% 4
ay (x+dx)
) 4 2 )1
)4
)6
1) 2)
)6
1 @
) ) 4 6 2 )1
7
%
68
Our proof uses the small rectangular element by shown in Figure 5.3(b). Consider the circulation round the perimeter of a rectangular element. The elds in the direction at the bottom and top are
Starting at the bottom and working round in the anticlockwise sense, the four contributions to the circulation are therefore as follows, where the minus signs take account of the path being opposed to the eld:
where . NB: Again, this is not a completely rigorous proof as we have not shown that the result is independent of the co-ordinate system used.
%
% ) 6 % % % 9 % % ( ( ( ( % % ( 2 % % ( 2 2 % 2 ( ( 5 % % % 2 % % 2 2 % 2
% ( ( 2
% 2
% ( ( 2
% 2
&$
&$
"
( ( )1 ( (' ( ' 8 9 9 )( 1 (
( (' ( ( (' (
&
&$" '%#!
70
Suppose that is a scalar eld and that is a vector eld and we are interested in the product . This is a vector eld, so we can compute its divergence and curl. of a uid is a scalar eld, and the instantaneous velocity For example the density of the uid is a vector eld, and we are probably interested in mass ow rates for which we will be interested in . is given by: The divergence (a scalar) of the product
In a similar way, we can take the curl of the vector eld vector eld:
Life quickly gets trickier when vector or scalar products are involved: For example, it is not that obvious that
" " &
curl
7 7 7 & " ( 2 ( 2
" $ 7 7 7
(
( ( ( ( ( (
2 ( ( 2 ( ( (
( (
9 2
(
(
( ( (
9
9 9
6.5. IDENTITY 5:
so the component is
where
This is a scalar operator, but it can obviously can be applied to a scalar eld, resulting in a scalar eld, or to a vector eld resulting in a vector eld:
where
)6
"
2 ) 4
"
6.7 Identity 6:
!
( ' ( ( ' ( ( ( 2 ( ( ( ( 2 ( ( 2 ( ( 2 ( ( ( ( 2 ( (
to the rst of these, and subtracting it from the last, and doing the to the other two terms, we nd that (you should of course check
9 9 2 9 9
' )( 6 (
' )( 4 ( 7
(
( ( ( (
2 (
' )( 1 ( (
2 (
6.5 Identity 5:
71
"
2 )1
" "
9
9
"
"
)1
"
72
In addition, we can assume the following, which should all be familiar to you: , , , where all the scalars are constants. , and with zero Now show that in a material with zero free charge density, conductivity, , the electric eld must be a solution of the wave equation A: First, a bit of respect. Imagine you are the rst to do this this is a tingle moment.
But we know (or rather you worked out in Identity 6) that , and using (c)
and so on for
( " ( ( ( %( ( &" %( ( ! " & & $" %( ' ( " " & '%#! " " & &'%$"#! " " % %( ' ( ' 2 ( ' ' ( 2 " ( ( ( ( & " & & $& 7 & & & & ' ( # "
and
3
""!
7 (
'
3
' ' #
"
"
' (
& &
"
"
Example of Identity 6: electromagnetic waves Q: James Clerk Maxwell established a set of four vector equations which are fundamental to working out how eletromagnetic waves propagate. The entire telecommunications industry is built on these.
It is possible to obtain general expressions for grad, div and curl in any orthogonal curvilinear co-ordinate system by making use of the factors which were introduced in Lecture 4. We recall that the unit vector in the direction of increasing , with and being kept constant, is
is the metric coefcient. Similar expressions apply for the other co-ordinate directions. Then
It follows that
is when
% ( 2 % ( 2 % ( % 2 % 2 % 9 ( ( (
% % %
% ( 2 % ( 2 % ( % % 9 ( ( (
)
( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 9 ( ( (
7 % 2 % 2 %
) 0%
% 7 % % !
73
( ( ((
) 0%
74
h (v) dw
w
h (v+dv) dw
w y
h (v) du
u
h (v+dv) du
u
h v dv
The scale params are functions of u,v,w
Figure 6.1: Elemental volume for calculating divergence in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates
However, it is not quite a cuboid: the area of two opposite faces will differ as the scale parameters are functions of , and in general. So the net efux from the two faces in the direction shown in Figure 6.1 is
which is easily shown by multiplying the rst line out and dropping second order terms (i.e. ). By denition div is the net efux per unit volume, so summing up the other faces:
So, nally,
% %% % %%
% %
2 2 ( ( ( ( 2 2 ( (
(
(
%% % ( 2
2 ( 2 ( ( (
( ( (
% % % % ( 2 % (
&
% % % ) 0% &
( ( 2
3 %
&
75
By analogy with our derivation of divergence, you will realize that for an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system we can write the area as . But the opposite sides are no longer quite of the same length. The lower of the pair in Figure 6.2 is length , but the upper is of length
y v+dv
u au (v)
u+du
Figure 6.2: Elemental loop for calculating curl in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates
% %
% % ( (
% % 2
% % 2 % 2
( ( ( (
% % (
% ( ( ( (
(
2 ( (
%
% % %
%
% %
)6
( ( ( (
2 )
((
" $ " ( 2 ) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 2 ( 2 ( ( ( 6) ( ( 2 ) ( ( 2 ) ( ( 2 2
" "
)6 2 ) 4
2 )1
% (
' ( (
"
( (
( 2
( (
( 2
( (
(
&
"
) ) )
) ( ( ( ( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 2 )
"
76
Here
You should check that this can be written as Curl in curvilinear coords:
Substitution of the components of into the expression for immediately (!*?) gives the following expression for the Laplacian in general orthogonal co-ordinates:
, etc.
in cylindrical polars
, and
F G9
R 53 @6W( 1 1
A 9 BS!
E56W! 1 3 ! 7 53 @6#! 1 R 5 C S63 D1 ( &$ " )'B! E 5 C 63 D1 7 53 64( 1 ( &$ " )'%#! H F9 ( &$ " A 9 H F IG9 A 9 ( &$ B@)8%" IG@T'! P 1 V0 U 1 1 Q0 1 1 20
7
. So
) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1
)
7 )6 2 ) 4
.
"
) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1
"
"
2 )4
77
2 )1
)6
.
Here
IN SPHERICAL POLARS
Q1 Find
A1 (i) In Cartesians
Examples
Hence as
in spherical polars
and
"
777 2 777 2
7 2 2 7 2 2 ( (
&
) 4
78
Q2 Find the divergence of the vector eld where is a constant vector (i) using Cartesian coordinates and (ii) using Spherical Polar coordinates.
)
2 )1
2
6 2 4 ) ) ) 6 ) 4 6 2 )1 2 4
Checking: these two results should be the same, but to check we need expressions for in terms of etc. Remember that we can work out the unit vectors and so on in terms of etc using
Dont be shocked to see a rotation matrix : we are after all rotating one righthanded orthogonal coord system into another. So the result in spherical polars is
) )6 )1 4
) )6 )1 4
7 ) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1 "
)1
)
(
%!
)
(
)
) 2 ! ) 2 ( ( ) 2 ( (
"
)
) )
Grinding through we nd
(
0%
) ) )
)1
) )
"
@ 2 @ ) 2 @ 2 2 @ @
) )6 )1 4 ) ) 46
)1
) 6 2 ) 4 2 )1 )
) )6 )1 4
) )6 )1 4
and our rst task is to nd and so on. We cant do this by inspection, and nding their values requires more work than you might think! Recall
Now the point is the same point in space whatever the coordinate system, so
IN SPHERICAL POLARS
, etc, where
#
) )6 )1 4
)
) )
2 ) 2 )
)
) )
2 ) # 2 )
80
This is EXACTLY what you worked out before of course. Take home messages from these examples:
Just as physical vectors are independent of their coordinate systems, so are differential operators.
Dont forget about the vector geometry you did in the 1st year. Rotation matrices are useful!
Spherical polars were NOT a good coordinate system in which to think about this problem. Let the symmetry guide you.
! )
( ( 2 2 )
2
@ @ # 2 @
#
2 @
2
)
( ( &
&
&