1
Introduction:
The nose is the most prominent part of the face. It’s a
sandwich of delicate cartilage pieces kept alive by a thin
vascular skin surface & a thinner more vascular lining.(3)
Bcc of the nose comprises (25.5%) of the total body
incidence as primary lesion & about (38%) of total body
incidence of recurrent BCC (8). Despite occasional case
reports, metastases from BCC are exceedingly rare. BCC may
kill by extension.(11)
Careful planning is especially important when operating
in nasal region. The treatment must completely eradicate the
neogenesis, yet spare the surrounding healthy tissue as much
as possible. Therefore particularly on the nose surgery is
superior to radiation due to anatomic structure here. The
danger of causing radiation injuries to the skin & cartilage
lying directly beneath it, is especially grate.(9)
Surgical reconstructions include usage of graft or flap or
both accordingly.
Methods of reconstruction:
Reconstruction of the nose was carried out for all
patients using direct suture, grafts or flaps under local or
2
general anesthesia. Skin graft were mainly used when the
tumor were superficial & did not involve underlying bone or
cartilage.
Grafts used in reconstruction were the split thickness
skin grafts (STSG.s), full thickness skin grafts (Wolfe graft) &
composite graft.
Skin grafts were used in 5 patients. Flaps were carried
out in 13 patients that were used mainly for reconstruction of
lesions involving the bone & cartilage.
The flaps were used in our study included:
1- V-Y advancement flaps (2 patients)
2- Forehead flaps (2 patients)
3- Cheek advancement flaps (1 patient)
4- Nasolabial flaps (3 patients)
5- Bilobed flaps (3 patients)
6- Dorsal nasal flaps (1 patient)
7- Caudal advancement flaps (1 patient).
For full thickness lesion, both flaps & grafts (mixed type)
were used for reconstruction, we use scalping forehead flap
with composite graft (skin & cartilage) for reconstruction of
these lesion (2 patients).
A silicon implant was used for reconstruction of nasal
skeleton defect in 1 patient but extruded later on.
3
defect from malignant cells (during this period the patient
was daily dressed with povidone iodine 10%).
Follow up: All patients were followed up weekly for the first
month, then monthly for the first year, this included local
examination, & photographs were carried out.
4
Results:
Regarding the sex , it can seen that (56.5%) of
43%
57%
Female Male
13% 17%
17%
53%
5
Fig (4) shows the percentage distribution of patients in
relation to the size of the lesion. It can be seen that the size
of the lesion in (34%) of patients was more than 2 cm in
diameter, were as (65.2%) of patients have lesions which
are 2 cm or less in diameter.
65.20 %
80.00%
60.00% 34.80 %
percentage
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
< or equal than > 2cm
2cm
size of lesion
26%
74%
6
(4.4%)were with pigmented lesion, & (8.61%) were
sclerosing.
FIg ( 6 ): show the type of the lesions among the study group
.
69.65
70
60
50
Pe rce ntage
40
30
17.39
8.61
20
4.4
10
0
Nodular Ulce rativ e Pigmne te d Scle rosing
Type of le sion
Nodular Ulcerative Pigmneted Sclerosing
7
Three of the patients had associated with xeroderma
pigmentosa.
Fig ( 7 ): show the percentage distribution of the prsenting symptoms among the
study group
43.5
45 34.8
40
35
30
Perenctage
25 13.04
20 8.2
15
10
5
0 1
Discussion:
Most of our patients were middle aged & elderly theis is
comparable to other studies (6), (4). Five patients were less
than 40 years of age, 3 of them had xeroderma pigmentosa, &
9
1 had multiple nevus basal cell syndrome, both of which
predispose to BCC at young age (1).
In our study, females were affected more than males
(56.5%) which differs from other studies (4). This higher
incidence in females ca be explained partly by increasing sun
exposure & probably by baking at home.
(43.5%) of our patients were from Baghdad & this is
explained by limited number of centers used for patients
collection.
(47.8%) of our patients were housewives, & (26.1%) were
farmers. Both statuses are also related to sun exposure & heat
radiation exposure, baking.
(52.2%) of lesions were seen on middle third of the nose,
which is comparable to other studies (8).
(65.2%) of lesions were 2cm or less in diameter at
presentation, & (73.9%) of patients have a single lesion, which
is comparable to other studies (4).
(69.65%) of lesions were of nodular type, which is
comparable to other studies (4).
(43.5%) of our patients were presented with itching at the
site of lesion, which differ from other studies (4)..
(65.22%) of our patients had the lesion for 1-5 years
before attempting to medical advice, which may reflect some
degree of ignorance on the side of the patients.
Primary reconstruction was attempted for lesion 2cm or
less in diameter & was done in different patients. For lesions
larger than 2cm in diameter with less definite edge & in the
absence of frozen section & with a doubt about the
completeness of excisions secondary reconstruction was
attempted (4). And so 8 patients had secondary reconstruction.
Flaps are preferable as they will match the color &
texture of the area to be reconstructed and so it was attempted
for 10 patients with lesions of 2 cm or less, 3 patients with
lesions more than 2 cm.
Skin graft was attempted for 2 patients with lesions less
than 2 cm, for 3 patients more than 2 cm lesions.
10
Mixed graft & flap was attempted to 2 lesions with full
thickness defect, which are more than 2 cm in diameter.
Direct suturing was used for 3 patients with lesions less
than 1 cm in diameter (7)).
Generally complications which occurred in our patients
were non serious & flaps were generally associated with fewer
complications compared to graft, & this may be explained by
the fact that flap maintains a better blood supply & may be
used for covering the recipient bed with poor vascularity (5).
The rate of complications associated with primary
reconstruction was higher than that for secondary
reconstruction (40%, 25% respectively), & the only recurrence
occurred following a primary reconstruction by skin grafts, so
that the recurrence is less dependant to the size of the lesion
which differ from other studies (10), so the completeness of
excision is more in secondary reconstrution & the final
reconstructive is well selected (4).
Hospitalization was longest in patients in whom mixed
flap – graft procedure were attempted (17.5 +_ 4.949) days, &
this is explained by the fact that this type of reconstruction is
more extensive & needs closer follow up.
Conclusios:
1- Surgery is one treatment modality for BCC of the nose,
and is associated with few side effect, short
hospitalization, & low recurrence rate.
2- The nose differs from other structures of the body,
because it comprises three components (skin cover,
skeleton, & lining), so the reconstruction of nasal lesions
11
needs more meticulous planning & careful selection of
surgical procedures. Different surgical procedures can
be used for reconstruction of nasal defects created by
excision of BCC of the nose.
3- Secondary reconstruction of nasal defects appears to be
more preferable, especially for defects with doubtful
margins, with the absence of frozen section (independent
to the size of the lesion) as it is associated with low rate
of complications, & low rate of recurrence.
4- Falps are superior to grafts, because they are associated
with lower incidence of complications, give better
contouring (except few) & are especially useful if there is
bare cartilage & bone. They give better healing with best
color match.
5- The recurrence of BCC of the nose is less dependent to
the size of the tumor.
References:
12
2- Barton F.E. reconstruction of the nose Grabb & smith
plastic surgery. 4th edition, Little & brown company:
pg:491 –503; 1991.
3- Burget G.C., Menick F.J. nasal reconstruction seeking a
fourth dimension. P.R.S; V78: N2; Pg. 145.August 1986.
4- Emmet A.J.J. & Micheal G.E. malignant skin tumor.
Churchill livingstone. Pg. 30-61; 1982
5- Grabb W.C. Cohen I. Basic technique of plastic surgery.
Little & Brown company. Grabb & Smith. 1991.
6- Harris T.J. skin cancer in sunny Queensland. B.J.P.29.
pg.61-67;1976
7- Jackson I.T. local flap in head & neck reconstruction.
The C.V. Mosby company. Pg. 87- 189.1985.
8- Koplin L., Zarem H.A. recurrent BCC. P.R.S: V65,No.5
PG.657-658:May 1980.
9- Petress J. reconstruction of nasal defects. Dermo –
surgery. Springer – Veralg pg. 50-60. 1978.
10-Suzzanne M. & Joel M. Cutaneous carcinoma textbook
of plastic, maxillofacial & reconstructive surgery. Pg141-
158:1992.
11-Epstein E. skin cancer. Technique in skin surgery.
Chapter23:p117-183: 1979.
13